From owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org  Mon Mar 10 07:23:54 2008
Return-Path: <owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ltans-archive-ba2WohFa@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltans-archive-ba2WohFa@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2308C28D092
	for <ietfarch-ltans-archive-ba2WohFa@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.364
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.364 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.235,
	BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
	by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 99EbsATsPAG4
	for <ietfarch-ltans-archive-ba2WohFa@core3.amsl.com>;
	Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (cl-240.ewr-01.us.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:4830:1200:ef::2])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D63128E18B
	for <ltans-archive-ba2WohFa@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2A9DZ26018738
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:13:35 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id m2A9DZh6018737;
	Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:13:35 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mail.ietf.org (mail.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::20])
	by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2A9DY8n018731
	for <ietf-ltans@imc.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:13:34 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from root@core3.amsl.com)
Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 0)
	id A396728E049; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart"
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: ietf-ltans@imc.org
From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltans-dssc-02.txt 
Message-Id: <20080310091505.A396728E049@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-ltans/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-ltans-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-ltans.imc.org>



--NextPart

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Long-Term Archive and Notary Services Working Group of the IETF.


	Title           : Data Structure for Security Suitabilities of Cryptographic Algorithms (DSSC)
	Author(s)       : T. Kunz, et al.
	Filename        : draft-ietf-ltans-dssc-02.txt
	Pages           : 38
	Date            : 2008-03-10

In many application areas it must be possible to prove the existence
and integrity of digital signed data.  This proof depends on the
security suitability of the used cryptographic algorithms.  Because
algorithms can become weak over the years, it is necessary to
periodically evaluate these security suitabilities.  When signing or
verifying data, these evaluations must be considered.  This document
specifies a data structure for security suitabilities of
cryptographic algorithms which may be automatically
interpreted.Conventions used in this document

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ltans-dssc-02.txt

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
Internet-Draft.

--NextPart
Content-Type: Message/External-body;
	name="draft-ietf-ltans-dssc-02.txt";
	site="ftp.ietf.org";
	access-type="anon-ftp";
	directory="internet-drafts"

Content-Type: text/plain
Content-ID:     <2008-03-10020637.I-D@ietf.org>

--NextPart--



From owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org  Wed Mar 12 13:50:28 2008
Return-Path: <owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ltans-archive-ba2WohFa@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltans-archive-ba2WohFa@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12ED23A69B3
	for <ietfarch-ltans-archive-ba2WohFa@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:50:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.469
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.469 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
	by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id hKQMyEnkS-oS
	for <ietfarch-ltans-archive-ba2WohFa@core3.amsl.com>;
	Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (cl-240.ewr-01.us.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:4830:1200:ef::2])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0856A3A68F6
	for <ltans-archive-ba2WohFa@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2CKWIUj012161
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:32:19 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id m2CKWIvA012160;
	Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:32:18 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from scygmxsecs1.cygnacom.com (scygmxsecs1.cygnacom.com [65.242.48.253])
	by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id m2CKWHjh012154
	for <ietf-ltans@imc.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:32:18 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from CWallace@cygnacom.com)
Received: (qmail 20924 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2008 20:24:13 -0000
Received: from CWallace@cygnacom.com by scygmxsecs1.cygnacom.com with EntrustECS-Server-7.4;12 Mar 2008 20:24:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO scygexch1.cygnacom.com) (10.60.50.8)
  by scygmxsecs1.cygnacom.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2008 20:24:13 -0000
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Subject: DSSC comment
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:32:15 -0400
Message-ID: <FAD1CF17F2A45B43ADE04E140BA83D483C575B@scygexch1.cygnacom.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: DSSC comment
Thread-Index: AciEgCipvf66xFc0StWT5VW5hKd0Sg==
From: "Carl Wallace" <CWallace@cygnacom.com>
To: <ietf-ltans@imc.org>
Sender: owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-ltans/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-ltans-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-ltans.imc.org>


There was a comment during the meeting regarding DSSC (that was raised
last meeting too).  Essentially, the question is why aren't parameters
associated with a validity period, with a list of parameters appearing
under an OID?  This would avoid searching the list for RSA, for example,
finding multiple entries and having to dig through the parameters until
finding an appropriate entry. =20



From owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org  Tue Mar 18 02:30:10 2008
Return-Path: <owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ltans-archive-ba2WohFa@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltans-archive-ba2WohFa@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957C228C4D7
	for <ietfarch-ltans-archive-ba2WohFa@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.74
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.74 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
	by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id eSz54J5joXLh
	for <ietfarch-ltans-archive-ba2WohFa@core3.amsl.com>;
	Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (cl-240.ewr-01.us.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:4830:1200:ef::2])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F1B28C4CD
	for <ltans-archive-ba2WohFa@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2I9E7uJ011825
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:14:07 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id m2I9E73F011824;
	Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:14:07 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20])
	by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id m2I9E4qF011815
	for <ietf-ltans@imc.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:14:05 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from SusanneO@gmx.de)
Received: (qmail 20812 invoked by uid 0); 18 Mar 2008 09:14:03 -0000
Received: from 213.157.4.156 by www036.gmx.net with HTTP;
 Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:14:03 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:14:03 +0100
From: "Susanne Okunick" <SusanneO@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <47DF85CE.5090803@pawisda.de>
Message-ID: <20080318091403.146940@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <47DF85CE.5090803@pawisda.de>
Subject: Re: DSSC comment
To: CWallace@cygnacom.com, ietf-ltans@imc.org
X-Authenticated: #1167296
X-Flags: 0001
X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 6100 (Global Message Exchange)
X-Priority: 3
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/DaTM/tgnDdXaE12RxRV9tVQ/FCJzXkYoXIIS5lq
 vQUG2FoOQk0InKk1xipUaK8OiuA3htbP87jg== 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-GMX-UID: 6rX5b0+eLi50NOjre2tpEWdrZml1ZNj+
Sender: owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-ltans/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-ltans-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-ltans.imc.org>


You are right. This would be more efficient. We will think about this issue and perhaps make changes on our structure. Thank you for this comment.

Carl Wallace schrieb:
> There was a comment during the meeting regarding DSSC (that was raised
> last meeting too).  Essentially, the question is why aren't parameters
> associated with a validity period, with a list of parameters appearing
> under an OID?  This would avoid searching the list for RSA, for example,
> finding multiple entries and having to dig through the parameters until
> finding an appropriate entry.  
> 
-- 
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört?
Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger




Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2I9E7uJ011825 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:14:07 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id m2I9E73F011824; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:14:07 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id m2I9E4qF011815 for <ietf-ltans@imc.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:14:05 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from SusanneO@gmx.de)
Received: (qmail 20812 invoked by uid 0); 18 Mar 2008 09:14:03 -0000
Received: from 213.157.4.156 by www036.gmx.net with HTTP; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:14:03 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:14:03 +0100
From: "Susanne Okunick" <SusanneO@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <47DF85CE.5090803@pawisda.de>
Message-ID: <20080318091403.146940@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <47DF85CE.5090803@pawisda.de>
Subject: Re: DSSC comment
To: CWallace@cygnacom.com, ietf-ltans@imc.org
X-Authenticated: #1167296
X-Flags: 0001
X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 6100 (Global Message Exchange)
X-Priority: 3
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/DaTM/tgnDdXaE12RxRV9tVQ/FCJzXkYoXIIS5lq vQUG2FoOQk0InKk1xipUaK8OiuA3htbP87jg== 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-GMX-UID: 6rX5b0+eLi50NOjre2tpEWdrZml1ZNj+
Sender: owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-ltans/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-ltans-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-ltans.imc.org>

You are right. This would be more efficient. We will think about this issue and perhaps make changes on our structure. Thank you for this comment.

Carl Wallace schrieb:
> There was a comment during the meeting regarding DSSC (that was raised
> last meeting too).  Essentially, the question is why aren't parameters
> associated with a validity period, with a list of parameters appearing
> under an OID?  This would avoid searching the list for RSA, for example,
> finding multiple entries and having to dig through the parameters until
> finding an appropriate entry.  
> 
-- 
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört?
Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger



Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2CKWIUj012161 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:32:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id m2CKWIvA012160; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:32:18 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from scygmxsecs1.cygnacom.com (scygmxsecs1.cygnacom.com [65.242.48.253]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id m2CKWHjh012154 for <ietf-ltans@imc.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:32:18 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from CWallace@cygnacom.com)
Received: (qmail 20924 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2008 20:24:13 -0000
Received: from CWallace@cygnacom.com by scygmxsecs1.cygnacom.com with EntrustECS-Server-7.4;12 Mar 2008 20:24:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO scygexch1.cygnacom.com) (10.60.50.8) by scygmxsecs1.cygnacom.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2008 20:24:13 -0000
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Subject: DSSC comment
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:32:15 -0400
Message-ID: <FAD1CF17F2A45B43ADE04E140BA83D483C575B@scygexch1.cygnacom.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: DSSC comment
Thread-Index: AciEgCipvf66xFc0StWT5VW5hKd0Sg==
From: "Carl Wallace" <CWallace@cygnacom.com>
To: <ietf-ltans@imc.org>
Sender: owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-ltans/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-ltans-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-ltans.imc.org>

There was a comment during the meeting regarding DSSC (that was raised
last meeting too).  Essentially, the question is why aren't parameters
associated with a validity period, with a list of parameters appearing
under an OID?  This would avoid searching the list for RSA, for example,
finding multiple entries and having to dig through the parameters until
finding an appropriate entry. =20



Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2A9DZ26018738 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:13:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id m2A9DZh6018737; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:13:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mail.ietf.org (mail.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::20]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2A9DY8n018731 for <ietf-ltans@imc.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:13:34 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from root@core3.amsl.com)
Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id A396728E049; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart"
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: ietf-ltans@imc.org
From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltans-dssc-02.txt 
Message-Id: <20080310091505.A396728E049@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-ltans/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-ltans-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-ltans.imc.org>

--NextPart

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Long-Term Archive and Notary Services Working Group of the IETF.


	Title           : Data Structure for Security Suitabilities of Cryptographic Algorithms (DSSC)
	Author(s)       : T. Kunz, et al.
	Filename        : draft-ietf-ltans-dssc-02.txt
	Pages           : 38
	Date            : 2008-03-10

In many application areas it must be possible to prove the existence
and integrity of digital signed data.  This proof depends on the
security suitability of the used cryptographic algorithms.  Because
algorithms can become weak over the years, it is necessary to
periodically evaluate these security suitabilities.  When signing or
verifying data, these evaluations must be considered.  This document
specifies a data structure for security suitabilities of
cryptographic algorithms which may be automatically
interpreted.Conventions used in this document

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ltans-dssc-02.txt

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
Internet-Draft.

--NextPart
Content-Type: Message/External-body;
	name="draft-ietf-ltans-dssc-02.txt";
	site="ftp.ietf.org";
	access-type="anon-ftp";
	directory="internet-drafts"

Content-Type: text/plain
Content-ID:     <2008-03-10020637.I-D@ietf.org>

--NextPart--


