From nobody Fri Feb 7 12:54:41 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: manet@ietf.org Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356151200D5; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 12:54:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: IETF Meeting Session Request Tool To: Cc: aretana.ietf@gmail.com, manet@ietf.org, ronald.intvelt@tno.nl, manet-chairs@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.117.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <158110887914.11722.4731335187991336643.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 12:54:39 -0800 Archived-At: Subject: [manet] manet - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 107 X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 20:54:39 -0000 A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Ronald in 't Velt, a Chair of the manet working group. --------------------------------------------------------- Working Group Name: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks Area Name: Routing Area Session Requester: Ronald in 't Velt Number of Sessions: 1 Length of Session(s): 1 Hour Number of Attendees: 15 Conflicts to Avoid: Technology Overlap: babel dtn Key Participant Conflict: raw netmod People who must be present: Lou Berger Alvaro Retana Rick Taylor Ronald in 't Velt Resources Requested: Special Requests: --------------------------------------------------------- From nobody Tue Feb 11 05:59:20 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5FC120128 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 05:59:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=tno.nl Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XrXGE1In_bVt for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 05:59:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from fromintouta.tno.nl (fromintouta.tno.nl [134.221.1.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 996A8120112 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 05:59:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tno.nl; l=7569; s=mta1; t=1581429554; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=N+tmVbtcIxhvZqi/8jhen9CUXV7q0S49lN2Ib+2Orb8=; b=O0TzLJ38PqxvHxsVg9BPNVi1SuyhNe+jO9DQCK9SbDCyMcdaMypQ/+ZV qbblflwbPw9NTqSG5CsTVr3KkXPi/3bbRV5bFs1GP50r6AoWbuwgiW6bt 23gLe//3bkgE6k/kocZ8KoAQumhkp4LZwxkTxFlAotB3Ex7J1o7XPWzII w=; IronPort-SDR: sVxocqcBdZmQS+V1ImTczqYXm7WiZ1IeRIlHwQKLtxvPETm+x8kvrhS/5lgebhPAkKbnUc/rbw EpDRJSZJxoXFzJKormt0RJacbDTnsFbDbn4rmyyz/qMJrT/vezMPYqdeIlSh8rx9DNOGVCxaw5 kF5Ng60oSJEIjyeAxo5DJuh9mCtSeOJpBozGyNcV96x40FGD415NCUGRvgYY9Sz1mkQqUf1UME 3s/TI02osIj/2HlPSc2Upmkgw4y+dZ5I1p5pVknzLDeFNXIG+FS3F0RZHi6tpG/i2q5jjut8vl BGU= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,428,1574118000"; d="scan'208,217";a="2805885" Received: from UCP13.tsn.tno.nl (134.221.225.173) by UCP33.tsn.tno.nl (134.221.225.178) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1847.3; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:59:11 +0100 Received: from UCP13.tsn.tno.nl ([fe80::c142:976e:5281:8298]) by UCP13.tsn.tno.nl ([fe80::c142:976e:5281:8298%7]) with mapi id 15.01.1847.003; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:59:11 +0100 From: "Velt, R. (Ronald) in 't" To: "manet@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: WGLC on three flow control related DLEP Extension I-Ds Thread-Index: AdXg3D+/7cPs/xg8T42gnjuIyJvKoA== Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:59:11 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US, nl-NL Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [134.221.225.191] x-esetresult: clean, is OK x-esetid: 37303A29EB2D456861756A Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_a637e09751134982a7101acb0f19b3f6tnonl_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: [manet] WGLC on three flow control related DLEP Extension I-Ds X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:59:18 -0000 --_000_a637e09751134982a7101acb0f19b3f6tnonl_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear MANETeers, Apologies for the long silence! Let's say I just came out of hibernation... This message start a renewed* Working Group Last Call on three Working Grou= p documents specifying DLEP extensions related to flow control, all authore= d by Lou Berger, Bow-Nan Cheng and David Wiggins: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-da-credit-extension/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classificati= on/ WGLC for all three Internet-Drafts will end by 29 February (2,5 weeks from = now). These are fairly short documents (18, 6 and 13 pages, respectively, b= oilerplate included). Please send your comments to the mailing list before = that date. If you have read these I-Ds and think they are in good shape, pl= ease say so as well. *A bit of history: Datatracker tells me that (previous versions of) these d= rafts had their state changed to 'In WG Last Call' by then-co-chair Justin = Dean on March 11, 2019. Interestingly, in the mailing list archive I found = neither a WGLC announcement around that date nor any subsequent discussion.= Lou Berger published updated versions during IETF-106. At the MANET WG ses= sion in Singapore, consensus in the room was to have another (short) WGLC. Thanks, Ronald in 't Velt This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you a= re not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are= requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liab= ility for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it an= d for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electroni= c transmission of messages. --_000_a637e09751134982a7101acb0f19b3f6tnonl_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear MANETeers,

 

Apologies for the long silence!= Let’s say I just came out of hibernation…

 

This message start a renewed* W= orking Group Last Call on three Working Group documents specifying DLEP ext= ensions related to flow control, all authored by Lou Berger, Bow-Nan Cheng = and David Wiggins:

 

https://datatracker= .ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control

https://datatracke= r.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-da-credit-extension/

https://datatra= cker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification/

 

WGLC for all three Internet-Dra= fts will end by 29 February (2,5 weeks from now). These are fairly short do= cuments (18, 6 and 13 pages, respectively, boilerplate included). Please se= nd your comments to the mailing list before that date. If you have read these I-Ds and think they are in good s= hape, please say so as well.

 

*A bit of history: Datatracker = tells me that (previous versions of) these drafts had their state changed t= o ‘In WG Last Call’ by then-co-chair Justin Dean on March 11, 2= 019. Interestingly, in the mailing list archive I found neither a WGLC announcement around that date nor any subsequent di= scussion. Lou Berger published updated versions during IETF-106. At the MAN= ET WG session in Singapore, consensus in the room was to have another (shor= t) WGLC.

 

Thanks,

Ronald in ‘t Velt

 

To: "manet@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: WG adoption call: draft-berger-manet-dlep-ether-credit-extension Thread-Index: AdXg6kTXdHTRpY8tSxySQRj5JU5ZJg== Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 15:38:50 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US, nl-NL Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [134.221.225.191] x-esetresult: clean, is OK x-esetid: 37303A29EB2D456861756A Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_e510ad719fae42eea99fc146340e9abetnonl_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: [manet] WG adoption call: draft-berger-manet-dlep-ether-credit-extension X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 15:39:05 -0000 --_000_e510ad719fae42eea99fc146340e9abetnonl_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear MANETeers, This message starts a second WG adoption call for draft-berger-manet-dlep-e= ther-credit-extension (DLEP IEEE 802.1Q Aware Credit Window Extension, http= s://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-berger-manet-dlep-ether-credit-extension= ), as agreed in the MANET WG session at IETF-106. An initial call for adoption was issued by our late WG chair, Stan Ratliff = on March 12, 2019 (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/CuZT7_heREtd= a5ogPu1j0wJKQUY). Unfortunately, it met with deafening silence on the maili= ng list. (I failed to respond myself, so I share in the blame!). I am hopin= g that this time you are able to find a moment to make your approval or obj= ections known. This adoption call runs until March 1. Thanks, Ronald This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you a= re not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are= requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liab= ility for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it an= d for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electroni= c transmission of messages. --_000_e510ad719fae42eea99fc146340e9abetnonl_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear MANETeers,

 

This message starts a second WG= adoption call for draft-berger-manet-dlep-ether-credit-extension (DLEP IEE= E 802.1Q Aware Credit Window Extension, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-berger-manet-dlep-ether-credit-exten= sion), as agreed in the MANET WG session at IETF-106.=

 

An initial call for adoption wa= s issued by our late WG chair, Stan Ratliff on March 12, 2019 (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/CuZT7_= heREtda5ogPu1j0wJKQUY). Unfortunately, it met with deafening silence on the mailing list. (I faile= d to respond myself, so I share in the blame!). I am hoping that this time = you are able to find a moment to make your approval or objections known. Th= is adoption call runs until March 1.

 

Thanks,

Ronald