Subject: Re: [marf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-marf-as-02.txt

From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 19:50:24 -0500

In <[email-masked]>, on 12/31/2011
   at 12:55 PM, Alessandro Vesely <[email-masked]> said:

>As there is no non-invasive established method to prove subscriptions
>(yet) I don't think it could make much sense to suggest to carry out
>such kind of check, e.g. by asking each user to reconfirm
>subscription.

An audit is less invasive than terminating them for violating the TOS.
If they want to preserve their reputation then they need to deal with
an acknowledged policy contravention, not just request listwashing.
The audit need not involve requesting each user to reconfirm.

-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     Atid/2        <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)