From wwwrun@rfc-editor.org Mon Jun 25 10:32:41 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBD821F853B; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:32:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.535 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.542, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZAQuJXgL1MaN; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:32:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfcpa.amsl.com [12.22.58.47]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D67721F84E6; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:32:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 919E6B1E008; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:31:45 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20120625173145.919E6B1E008@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:31:45 -0700 (PDT) Cc: marf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [marf] RFC 6650 on Creation and Use of Email Feedback Reports: An Applicability Statement for the Abuse Reporting Format (ARF) X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:32:41 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 6650 Title: Creation and Use of Email Feedback Reports: An Applicability Statement for the Abuse Reporting Format (ARF) Author: J. Falk, M. Kucherawy, Ed. Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: June 2012 Mailbox: none, superuser@gmail.com Pages: 15 Characters: 35273 Updates: RFC5965 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-marf-as-16.txt URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6650.txt RFC 5965 defines an extensible, machine-readable format intended for mail operators to report feedback about received email to other parties. This applicability statement describes common methods for utilizing this format for reporting both abuse and authentication failure events. Mailbox Providers of any size, mail-sending entities, and end users can use these methods as a basis to create procedures that best suit them. Some related optional mechanisms are also discussed. [STANDARDS-TRACK] This document is a product of the Messaging Abuse Reporting Format Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Internet Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html. For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html. Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From wwwrun@rfc-editor.org Mon Jun 25 10:44:44 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275F211E8095; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:44:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.854 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.854 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.146, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pLIwkLJoDSxM; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:44:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C46A11E8073; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:44:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id F0717B1E017; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:32:06 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20120625173206.F0717B1E017@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:32:06 -0700 (PDT) Cc: marf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [marf] RFC 6652 on Sender Policy Framework (SPF) Authentication Failure Reporting Using the Abuse Reporting Format X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:44:44 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 6652 Title: Sender Policy Framework (SPF) Authentication Failure Reporting Using the Abuse Reporting Format Author: S. Kitterman Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: June 2012 Mailbox: scott@kitterman.com Pages: 8 Characters: 15373 Updates: RFC4408 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting-11.txt URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6652.txt This memo presents extensions to the Abuse Reporting Format (ARF) and Sender Policy Framework (SPF) specifications to allow for detailed reporting of message authentication failures in an on-demand fashion. This memo updates RFC 4408 by providing an IANA registry for SPF modifiers. [STANDARDS-TRACK] This document is a product of the Messaging Abuse Reporting Format Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Internet Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html. For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html. Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From wwwrun@rfc-editor.org Mon Jun 25 10:44:44 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9C311E8073; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:44:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.858 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.858 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.142, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ei3jjgS7wMmW; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:44:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0AB711E8091; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:44:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id C4965B1E008; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:31:55 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20120625173155.C4965B1E008@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:31:55 -0700 (PDT) Cc: marf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [marf] RFC 6651 on Extensions to DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) for Failure Reporting X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:44:44 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 6651 Title: Extensions to DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) for Failure Reporting Author: M. Kucherawy Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: June 2012 Mailbox: superuser@gmail.com Pages: 18 Characters: 35028 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-marf-dkim-reporting-16.txt URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6651.txt This document presents extensions to the DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) specification to allow for detailed reporting of message authentication failures in an on-demand fashion. [STANDARDS-TRACK] This document is a product of the Messaging Abuse Reporting Format Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Internet Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html. For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html. Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Tue Jun 26 10:06:39 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C72A21F85FB; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:06:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.534 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.534 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.065, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9SS+rAPjHBkE; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:06:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F3521F85F0; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:06:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: IESG Secretary To: IETF Announcement List X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.21 Message-ID: <20120626170638.10365.81623.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:06:38 -0700 Cc: marf@ietf.org Subject: [marf] WG Action: Conclusion of Messaging Abuse Reporting Format (marf) X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:06:39 -0000 The Messaging Abuse Reporting Format (marf) Working Group in the = Applications Area has concluded. The IESG contact persons are Barry = Leiba and Pete Resnick. The RFC Editor has published the final MARF documents, and the working group has finished its work and is now closing. The Applications ADs thank the anti-abuse community for its work in producing Abuse Reporting Format standards and related information. Special posthumous thanks go to the late JD Falk, who worked on his contributions through periods of hospitalization. The mailing list will remain open for related discussions. From sm@resistor.net Tue Jun 26 11:26:05 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647CA21F85AD for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:26:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.567 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iZ3BYus7UODK for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:26:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750AF21F85AA for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:26:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5QIPtSu014295; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:25:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1340735160; i=@resistor.net; bh=NKoRmgz83H9mAb+dBBV6BP5Ot3jIaFerIePcDbLh0CE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc; b=phc/ygLRSo4G0RaV5FOn3BxeWgkFS6PcR37T7sOffB88dzrmeoK6vs5+mDMvFD1yu 2ckvTLhA9auZbPFyxxLhFT9K64bUOQ388BG/f1oW17AUKB9c4oi10bxF4sSJx/z9Ss txIUYQM0JC6zvItUwUI7eZ9tCOJXo7/qIbTld0VQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1340735160; i=@resistor.net; bh=NKoRmgz83H9mAb+dBBV6BP5Ot3jIaFerIePcDbLh0CE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc; b=INXBIh9ZreR2l6a1G5C8uyNG6Ih5eHkgYjWMrh40CFM722NGa06V47OckJXuos5xS sl22m72WCs6FoDe699zTjK7ZOEIhs0u2zOhsiVCW3zYWsJihklxJAOIRTmITP2VB7I Qy+Ldrko2yQBWHbM9u5pRplsMs+KBmL4czQJvy5I= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120626111934.0a7de9f0@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:25:23 -0700 To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" From: SM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: marf@ietf.org Subject: [marf] IANA Modifier Names registry X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:26:05 -0000 Hi Murray, I noticed that the IANA Modifier Names (SPF) registry references draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting-10. Shouldn't that be updated to RFC 6652? Regards, -sm From superuser@gmail.com Tue Jun 26 13:00:28 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20B221F85E6 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:00:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.454 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.144, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z8tmBViMnA9O for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:00:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 999B721F85DF for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:00:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by bkty8 with SMTP id y8so352870bkt.31 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:00:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=FJGphzUuTCgUuYtnjxsSe/8pmMBoODEYFzKn3B8LfSM=; b=U2aJkUaM1QJuly9hn1GDGAgfiM4bKYOJNFmU/BVudgWZcysEYxR2UPNc5MCOg7ktOF iOKqx2gKJqgfVMSgIyzJ1i0LXESNRslYD1xA+KI1CZJiw6GqDZ7TF/P4SSYpYXrBqoae QK6TmFk31QOFw744NroiDijZbXRMLlgeiUpomG1awd06jd7fl9xkcJ/v5UXZzNI/w0nk 6TJ2ZHcA47dh6hm39TK/VaI/HxEEBPpRM8LkkdXdLInpiVL34XNEx4hmS/FP3g5/T3PT uVdzlCbcCEuAen8eHL95OrVV9IcPPJq6N6I0Dx1sv4kIP9W1E0/GO569qmU6diENXX7r +alg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.104.171 with SMTP id gf11mr17679672lab.5.1340740825044; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:00:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.89.3 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:00:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120626111934.0a7de9f0@elandnews.com> References: <6.2.5.6.2.20120626111934.0a7de9f0@elandnews.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:00:24 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" To: SM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04083de79cd7ba04c3658c3a Cc: marf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [marf] IANA Modifier Names registry X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:00:28 -0000 --f46d04083de79cd7ba04c3658c3a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:25 AM, SM wrote: > Hi Murray, > > I noticed that the IANA Modifier Names (SPF) registry references > draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting-**10. Shouldn't that be updated to RFC > 6652? > > I imagine if IANA doesn't do that on its own in the next couple of days, someone should drop them a note. -MSK --f46d04083de79cd7ba04c3658c3a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:25 AM, SM <sm@resistor.net> wrote:<= br>
Hi Murray,

I noticed that the IANA Modifier Names (SPF) registry references draft-ietf= -marf-spf-reporting-10. =A0Shouldn't that be updated to RFC 6652= ?


I imagine if IANA doesn't do that on its own = in the next couple of days, someone should drop them a note.

-MSK

--f46d04083de79cd7ba04c3658c3a--