From nobody Sun Jul 19 03:00:05 2015
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56271A1A30 for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 03:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.912
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kNVcldjI9YUz for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 03:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7631A1A33 for <marf@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 03:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0CD94180205; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 02:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf@shaftek.org, standards@taugh.com, msk@cloudmark.com, barryleiba@computer.org, superuser@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20150719095616.0CD94180205@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 02:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/marf/AjVkwfR6qWlLWRsfoW2IQhGn7xY>
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, simon.leinen@switch.ch, marf@ietf.org
Subject: [marf] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5965 (4421)
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/marf/>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 10:00:03 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5965,
"An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5965&eid=4421

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Simon Leinen <simon.leinen@switch.ch>

Section: B.2

Original Text
-------------
   --part1_13d.2e68ed54_boundary
   Content-Type: message/rfc822
   Content-Disposition: inline

   From: <somespammer@example.net>
   Received: from mailserver.example.net (mailserver.example.net
        [192.0.2.1]) by example.com with ESMTP id M63d4137594e46;
        Thu, 08 Mar 2005 14:00:00 -0400

   To: <Undisclosed Recipients>
   Subject: Earn money


Corrected Text
--------------
   --part1_13d.2e68ed54_boundary
   Content-Type: message/rfc822
   Content-Disposition: inline

   From: <somespammer@example.net>
   Received: from mailserver.example.net (mailserver.example.net
        [192.0.2.1]) by example.com with ESMTP id M63d4137594e46;
        Thu, 08 Mar 2005 14:00:00 -0400
   To: <Undisclosed Recipients>
   Subject: Earn money


Notes
-----
In the second example report, there is an empty line in the middle of the headers section of the quoted rfc822 message.  This seems wrong.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5965 (draft-ietf-marf-base-06)
--------------------------------------
Title               : An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports
Publication Date    : August 2010
Author(s)           : Y. Shafranovich, J. Levine, M. Kucherawy
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Messaging Abuse Reporting Format
Area                : Applications
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG


From nobody Sun Jul 19 03:27:07 2015
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0AB1A92DE; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 03:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.912
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oeut_sGhhV2w; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 03:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696DA1A92E6; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 03:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 84A3A180205; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 03:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
To: simon.leinen@switch.ch, ietf@shaftek.org, standards@taugh.com, msk@cloudmark.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20150719102319.84A3A180205@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 03:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/marf/_42QqoSPK_JGGHJqQjdUeJDwc_Y>
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, barryleiba@computer.org, iesg@ietf.org, marf@ietf.org
Subject: [marf] [Errata Verified] RFC5965 (4421)
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/marf/>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 10:27:06 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC5965,
"An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5965&eid=4421

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Simon Leinen <simon.leinen@switch.ch>
Date Reported: 2015-07-19
Verified by: Barry Leiba (IESG)

Section: B.2

Original Text
-------------
   --part1_13d.2e68ed54_boundary
   Content-Type: message/rfc822
   Content-Disposition: inline

   From: <somespammer@example.net>
   Received: from mailserver.example.net (mailserver.example.net
        [192.0.2.1]) by example.com with ESMTP id M63d4137594e46;
        Thu, 08 Mar 2005 14:00:00 -0400

   To: <Undisclosed Recipients>
   Subject: Earn money


Corrected Text
--------------
   --part1_13d.2e68ed54_boundary
   Content-Type: message/rfc822
   Content-Disposition: inline

   From: <somespammer@example.net>
   Received: from mailserver.example.net (mailserver.example.net
        [192.0.2.1]) by example.com with ESMTP id M63d4137594e46;
        Thu, 08 Mar 2005 14:00:00 -0400
   To: <Undisclosed Recipients>
   Subject: Earn money


Notes
-----
In the second example report, there is an empty line in the middle of the headers section of the quoted rfc822 message.  This seems wrong.

--------------------------------------
RFC5965 (draft-ietf-marf-base-06)
--------------------------------------
Title               : An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports
Publication Date    : August 2010
Author(s)           : Y. Shafranovich, J. Levine, M. Kucherawy
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Messaging Abuse Reporting Format
Area                : Applications
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG


From nobody Sun Jul 19 11:25:42 2015
Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32BC1A88A0 for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 11:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.137
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.137 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Krk4U5fI5hyv for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 11:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E4121A889A for <marf@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 11:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 19909 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2015 18:25:54 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=4dc4.55abebb2.k1507; bh=85Wqa5XX2U75eA+fgPbfYYcDEXFKhHG294WWEhb4FbA=; b=LgrZ7TObBPNHvKQx02KJxumgBTX3y6VUs/9IEQjt9Nwev6n7zv78eTYQMbapi5ovkvYRhmnjMPeA06Az614Bvsl6uim4/lKJaXJAqeI5HVz8L7u/kRx4Bav5wg1TxqdzuuvRgdH7O0pTQF2dbch7UY9lTXx2cq9HailgZwU92Zu3G4fnUI66sHHPm/xbSS0tCSAm3l/fRYyMYVeF8KHXYB6Pdw0t7k7TFYy+Pf+CV4muamvLTAF9zN+z2iMFZi2s
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=4dc4.55abebb2.k1507; bh=85Wqa5XX2U75eA+fgPbfYYcDEXFKhHG294WWEhb4FbA=; b=gzo1VynMoHKhwf41nVBrl1ROo+BNdyFp/HhflVHS0A2WmMgzQQuNqYQ1Xmw2KwjJY60kuUdnHdczIhbkc2bzM87Bf/jaCzSqtZyXaqVIBoURdjLJKhx0t/VAp7mpHRLm8Wlhi7/5O3yfI5QlLp7lJMmSdreiyPL+2v1aceA3o2zLB+O4Uns8CqZzT62z5x+eooQLI8WVhFPfhkbfxbzPBHlvPzVjriOWgX1Msb12IGvZJqc1mpPr/+5t3Pc6EDNC
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 19 Jul 2015 18:25:54 -0000
Date: 19 Jul 2015 14:25:37 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1507191424250.66880@ary.lan>
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "RFC Errata System" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150719095616.0CD94180205@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20150719095616.0CD94180205@rfc-editor.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/marf/WOD0YfgyQA8Dxr4eDcyIvpKNnMg>
Cc: ietf@shaftek.org, simon.leinen@switch.ch, msk@cloudmark.com, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, marf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [marf] [taugh.com-standards] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5965 (4421)
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/marf/>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 18:25:42 -0000

Barry points out that the same text appears on page 24 in section B.2, and 
thereis an extra blank line there.  Oops.  That really is a mistake.

R's,
John


> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5965,
> "An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5965&eid=4421
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Simon Leinen <simon.leinen@switch.ch>
>
> Section: B.2
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>   --part1_13d.2e68ed54_boundary
>   Content-Type: message/rfc822
>   Content-Disposition: inline
>
>   From: <somespammer@example.net>
>   Received: from mailserver.example.net (mailserver.example.net
>        [192.0.2.1]) by example.com with ESMTP id M63d4137594e46;
>        Thu, 08 Mar 2005 14:00:00 -0400
>
>   To: <Undisclosed Recipients>
>   Subject: Earn money
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>   --part1_13d.2e68ed54_boundary
>   Content-Type: message/rfc822
>   Content-Disposition: inline
>
>   From: <somespammer@example.net>
>   Received: from mailserver.example.net (mailserver.example.net
>        [192.0.2.1]) by example.com with ESMTP id M63d4137594e46;
>        Thu, 08 Mar 2005 14:00:00 -0400
>   To: <Undisclosed Recipients>
>   Subject: Earn money
>
>
> Notes
> -----
> In the second example report, there is an empty line in the middle of the headers section of the quoted rfc822 message.  This seems wrong.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5965 (draft-ietf-marf-base-06)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports
> Publication Date    : August 2010
> Author(s)           : Y. Shafranovich, J. Levine, M. Kucherawy
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Messaging Abuse Reporting Format
> Area                : Applications
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
>

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.