From owner-ietf-mxcomp@mail.imc.org Tue Apr 03 00:23:07 2007 Return-path: Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HYaXz-0004xl-Sl for marid-archive@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 00:23:07 -0400 Received: from balder-227.proper.com ([192.245.12.227]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HYaXv-00086x-Ee for marid-archive@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 00:23:07 -0400 Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l333mlvl020237 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 20:48:47 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mxcomp@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id l333mlCk020236; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 20:48:47 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mxcomp@mail.imc.org) X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-mxcomp@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.251]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l333mPSU020226 for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 20:48:46 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from perlstalker@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d33so1448130and for ; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 20:48:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=nykBtDZe27YjJ7sgALhSSl9yl7amrpEF9TxUL9d6w4Ma2vg3NahxTmRLAqEcl8jMfYX3GWEqn5i/pHnQz0GKODE/j5J2yHu9m6GRuaiAWvgUFQZvEHc5aZe3U3r64D42At+jIX7duhV+Xe+EebVvrTPm1t4Q/cP/5wdBaDUB9DM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=pS1YSwpc5xqF1TPjEgYlFn/r64cWP0u/o1Qto2eZYwOgkVmFDeWDLI6tFZz+NcbBVntjlJusWK6XSqAW1Fo+MHMI6c+rLo6pi6Kd2hSQVL/Uw1DEFBXWrGd3COu+qvg9YIxp79Xb3m3l2F2pJn43JN4oHmNa55wxCFceiXCHKvU= Received: by 10.114.192.1 with SMTP id p1mr2089401waf.1175572103796; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 20:48:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.48.1 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 20:48:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 21:48:23 -0600 From: "Randy Smith" To: "Jeff Macdonald" Subject: Re: Mail Server Registries and Foreign Sender Authentication: A Proposal Cc: "Douglas Otis" , ietf-mxcomp@imc.org In-Reply-To: <20070329025257.GB3646@jmac> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1174958420.5962.76.camel@dcore.sonic.net> <20070329025257.GB3646@jmac> X-Google-Sender-Auth: c12c8e768a2de123 Sender: owner-ietf-mxcomp@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: List-ID: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: d185fa790257f526fedfd5d01ed9c976 On 3/28/07, Jeff Macdonald wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 07:42:51AM -0600, Randy Smith wrote: > > > Since OpenID is built to allow authentication, among other things, > > against 3rd party systems, it seems like an excellent way to allow and > > recipient server to authenticate all users who wish to send or deliver > > mail with their server. > > Randy, could you use OpenID terms in describing your SMTP extension? > I'm having trouble understanding how this would work from your > description in your blog. Adding PGP seems to add additional overhead > for what OpenID provides (unless I'm totally mis-understanding OpenID). > Here are what I think are some of the relevant terms: What I was think of was using the trust features of PGP to allow the server to make decisions based on how much the key is trusted and the "trustiness" of other keys in the chain. If a web of trust could be built by some other means than PGP, that's fine. It's the trust and key signing that's important here, not the encryption. > > MTA terms: > C: Sending MTA - sending message > S: Receiving MTA - receiving message > > OpenID terms: > Consumer - wants proof > End User - wants to prove their identity to Consumer > User Agent - End user web browser > > I is the Identity server > > Say there is a new ESMTP keyword, OPENID. Here's a breakdown loosely > following your example: > > C->S: connects > S->C: banner > > C->S: ehlo > S->C: OPENID is returned along with whatever else > > C->S: OPENID > S: > S->I: > S->C: 250 > > S->I: associate with identity provider? Section 4.1.x > > C->I: go to identity provider? Section 4.2.x Honestly, I'm not sure as I'm not familiar with the details of Open ID. I think the best way would be for the server to verify the identity with the ID provider rather than trust the client. > > C->S: OPENID CRED > S->C: 250 Ok Credentials are OK > > > > I may of abused SMTP extensions in this example (re: OPENID CRED). That's pretty close to what I was thinking. > > -- > :: Jeff Macdonald | Principal Engineer, Messaging Technologies > :: e-Dialog | jmacdonald@e-dialog.com > :: 131 Hartwell Ave. | Lexington, MA 02421 > :: v: 781-372-1922 | f: 781-863-8118 > :: www.e-dialog.com > > -- Randy Smith http://vuser.org/ http://perlstalker.vuser.org/ From owner-ietf-mxcomp@mail.imc.org Tue Apr 03 14:49:15 2007 Return-path: Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HYo4B-0000RK-Pp for marid-archive@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 14:49:15 -0400 Received: from balder-227.proper.com ([192.245.12.227]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HYo47-0006KF-V0 for marid-archive@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 14:49:15 -0400 Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l33IHmSI085264 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Apr 2007 11:17:48 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mxcomp@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id l33IHmnJ085263; Tue, 3 Apr 2007 11:17:48 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mxcomp@mail.imc.org) X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-mxcomp@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from a.mail.sonic.net (a.mail.sonic.net [64.142.16.245]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l33IHReb085234 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2007 11:17:47 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from dotis@mail-abuse.org) Received: from [10.2.165.149] (net-office-sjc.mail-abuse.org [168.61.0.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by a.mail.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l33IHLtj013750 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Apr 2007 11:17:21 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <1174958420.5962.76.camel@dcore.sonic.net> <20070329025257.GB3646@jmac> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Cc: "Jeff Macdonald" , ietf-mxcomp@imc.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Douglas Otis Subject: Re: Mail Server Registries and Foreign Sender Authentication: A Proposal Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 11:17:29 -0700 To: Randy Smith X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Sender: owner-ietf-mxcomp@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: List-ID: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 31247fb3be228bb596db9127becad0bc On Apr 2, 2007, at 8:48 PM, Randy Smith wrote: > On 3/28/07, Jeff Macdonald wrote: >> Randy, could you use OpenID terms in describing your SMTP extension? >> I'm having trouble understanding how this would work from your >> description in your blog. Adding PGP seems to add additional overhead >> for what OpenID provides (unless I'm totally mis-understanding >> OpenID). >> Here are what I think are some of the relevant terms: > > What I was think of was using the trust features of PGP to allow the > server to make decisions based on how much the key is trusted and the > "trustiness" of other keys in the chain. If a web of trust could be > built by some other means than PGP, that's fine. It's the trust and > key signing that's important here, not the encryption. Perhaps someone could use OpenID for email submission. Providers would need to establish another method to validate the holder of the OpenID. OpenID might improve the user experience when offered as an option to those who's identity has already been validated by other means. OpenID vouches for an ID, but does not exclude bad actors holding millions of such OpenIDs. In such a case, when OpenID requires account details to change, some other method other than OpenID would be required. Perhaps OpenID provides their public key to be used as another authentication alternative. >> MTA terms: >> C: Sending MTA - sending message >> S: Receiving MTA - receiving message >> >> OpenID terms: >> Consumer - wants proof >> End User - wants to prove their identity to Consumer >> User Agent - End user web browser >> >> I is the Identity server >> >> Say there is a new ESMTP keyword, OPENID. Here's a breakdown loosely >> following your example: >> >> C->S: connects >> S->C: banner >> >> C->S: ehlo >> S->C: OPENID is returned along with whatever else >> >> C->S: OPENID >> S: >> S->I: >> S->C: 250 >> >> S->I: associate with identity provider? Section 4.1.x >> >> C->I: go to identity provider? Section 4.2.x > > Honestly, I'm not sure as I'm not familiar with the details of Open > ID. I think the best way would be for the server to verify the > identity with the ID provider rather than trust the client. OpenID will not function in a manner similar to that of kerberos. The user agent acknowledges a query, but contains no intelligence. This makes OpenID instantly available but somewhat fragile and poorly suited for automated authentications. The OpenID could offer authorizations. : ) >> C->S: OPENID CRED >> S->C: 250 Ok Credentials are OK >> >> >> >> I may of abused SMTP extensions in this example (re: OPENID CRED). > > That's pretty close to what I was thinking. Review rfc2554 and rfc4409. OpenID for SMTP authentication of outbound mail would likely need to restrict the selection of the Identity servers. This would tend to make OpenID in this case a bit less open. : ) -Doug From sprt_y_mb@yahoo.co.jp Wed Apr 04 11:29:19 2007 Return-path: Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HZ7QF-0002tZ-5R; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:29:19 -0400 Received: from [222.127.4.232] (helo=pc30) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HZ7QC-0004z4-BT; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:29:19 -0400 From: =?iso-2022-jp?B?c3BydF95X21iQHlhaG9vLmNvLmpw?= Subject: =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCJSglQyVBJEpNRCRKOkokckp6JCQkRiRfJF4kOyRzJCshKRsoQg==?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 23:04:09 +0900 Content-Type:text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 4.5 (++++) X-Scan-Signature: bb8f917bb6b8da28fc948aeffb74aa17 $B!!?M:J$K6=L#$N$"$kJ}8BDj$G$NJg=8$H$J$j$^$9!#(B $B!!?M:JNq#1G/L$K~$NM7$SB-$j$J$$=w@-$,Cf?4$G$9!#(B $B!!#3#0Be!A#4#0Be$N=w@-$O$b$A$m$s$N$3$H!"(B $B!!#2#0Be$N=w@-!"#1#0Be$N=w@-$b>/$7$G$9$,$4>R2p=PMh$^$9!#(B $B!!0lHLFH?H=w@-$H0c$$!"?M:J$NJ}$NEPO?$,Cf?4$G$9$N$G!"(B $B!!@Q6KE*$K%"%W%m!<%A$5$l$kJ}$,B?$/!"(B $B!!CK@-EPO?$rD:$$$F$$$^$9!#(B $B!!:#2s$NJg=8$K$D$-$^$7$F!"40A4L5NA$G$N$4>R2p$H$J$j$^$9$N$G!"(B $B!!Aa4|=*N;$N2DG=@-$,$4$6$$$^$9!#(B $B!!Jg=8=*N;$H$J$C$?>l9g$G$b!"(B $B!!$4MxMQNA6b$NH/@8$O0l@Z$"$j$^$;$s$N$G$40B?42<$5$$!#(B $B!!(Bhttp://qp-sp.com/sw/?media=pcy10 $B!!(B------------------------------------------- $B!!!!(#(!(!($!#"h!y!!:#2s$N$4>R2p=w@-!!!y(B $B!!!!("!@!?("!!!!!!!y!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!y(B $B!!(B------------------------------------------- $B!!!!L>A0!'%f%-!!!!!!!!!!!!L>A0!'??5*;R(B $B!!!!G/Np!'#2#7:P!!!!!!!!!!G/Np!'#3#2:P(B $B!!!!(B $B!!=iIb5$!'2q\:Y$O%3%A%i!!"M!!(B $B!!(Bhttp://qp-sp.com/sw/?media=pcy10 From sprt_y_mb@yahoo.co.jp Thu Apr 05 05:53:20 2007 Return-path: Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HZOee-0001Ae-05; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 05:53:20 -0400 Received: from [222.127.4.232] (helo=pc31) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HZOec-0004Xj-62; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 05:53:19 -0400 From: =?iso-2022-jp?B?c3BydF95X21iQHlhaG9vLmNvLmpw?= Subject: =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCJSglQyVBJEpNRCRKOkokckp6JCQkRiRfJF4kOyRzJCshKRsoQg==?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:31:11 +0900 Content-Type:text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 4.5 (++++) X-Scan-Signature: bb8f917bb6b8da28fc948aeffb74aa17 $B!!?M:J$K6=L#$N$"$kJ}8BDj$G$NJg=8$H$J$j$^$9!#(B $B!!?M:JNq#1G/L$K~$NM7$SB-$j$J$$=w@-$,Cf?4$G$9!#(B $B!!#3#0Be!A#4#0Be$N=w@-$O$b$A$m$s$N$3$H!"(B $B!!#2#0Be$N=w@-!"#1#0Be$N=w@-$b>/$7$G$9$,$4>R2p=PMh$^$9!#(B $B!!0lHLFH?H=w@-$H0c$$!"?M:J$NJ}$NEPO?$,Cf?4$G$9$N$G!"(B $B!!@Q6KE*$K%"%W%m!<%A$5$l$kJ}$,B?$/!"(B $B!!CK@-EPO?$rD:$$$F$$$^$9!#(B $B!!:#2s$NJg=8$K$D$-$^$7$F!"40A4L5NA$G$N$4>R2p$H$J$j$^$9$N$G!"(B $B!!Aa4|=*N;$N2DG=@-$,$4$6$$$^$9!#(B $B!!Jg=8=*N;$H$J$C$?>l9g$G$b!"(B $B!!$4MxMQNA6b$NH/@8$O0l@Z$"$j$^$;$s$N$G$40B?42<$5$$!#(B $B!!(Bhttp://qp-sp.com/sw/?media=pcy10 $B!!(B------------------------------------------- $B!!!!(#(!(!($!#"h!y!!:#2s$N$4>R2p=w@-!!!y(B $B!!!!("!@!?("!!!!!!!y!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!y(B $B!!(B------------------------------------------- $B!!!!L>A0!'%f%-!!!!!!!!!!!!L>A0!'??5*;R(B $B!!!!G/Np!'#2#7:P!!!!!!!!!!G/Np!'#3#2:P(B $B!!!!(B $B!!=iIb5$!'2q\:Y$O%3%A%i!!"M!!(B $B!!(Bhttp://qp-sp.com/sw/?media=pcy10 From win@clockmail.net Thu Apr 12 02:13:01 2007 Return-path: Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HbsYG-00082j-SM for marid-archive@lists.ietf.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 02:13:00 -0400 Received: from [125.187.32.223] (helo=m23.mailyes.net) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HbsVm-0000xg-Ef for marid-archive@lists.ietf.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 02:10:28 -0400 Received: (qmail 20898 invoked by uid 0); 12 Apr 2007 15:09:10 +0900 Message-ID: <20070412060910.20897.qmail@m23.mailyes.net> To: marid-archive Subject: =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJSIlcyUrITxHJCQ7JGsbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJE0bKEJeXg==?= From: Reply-to: delivery_rt Date: 2007-04-12 15:08:16 Content-type: text/plain; charset= ISO-2022-JP X-Mailer: GOOD Mailer 1.0 X-Priority: 1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Keywords: 20070412134433_cbao Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 4.9 (++++) X-Scan-Signature: b19722fc8d3865b147c75ae2495625f2 $B;dC#=w$N;R$@$C$F=P2q$$$?$$$s$G$9!#(B $B;d$O$b$&=P2q$C$?$+$i7BT>u(Bhttp://deachao.hustle.ne.jp/index2.html$B$,l=j7h$a$F$/$l$k$@$1$G$b;d$OI,$:9T$/$+$i!DO"Mm$/$@$5$$!#(B $B$[$s$H$&$K$b$&$3$N@h!D(B From natuko85496@126.com Tue Apr 24 16:46:46 2007 Return-path: Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgRuQ-0005ii-4P for marid-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:46:46 -0400 Received: from [58.233.137.51] (helo=no.domain) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgRuO-0001LB-Bj for marid-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:46:46 -0400 Received: (qmail 22854 invoked by uid 48); 25 Apr 2007 04:38:24 +0900 Date: 25 Apr 2007 04:38:24 +0900 To: marid-archive@megatron.ietf.org Subject: =?ISO-2022-JP?B?km6Ms4LMg0mDb4NUg5OC8JX4gquCvYKigsWCt4KpgUiDjIN4g4uCzZLhgqKCxYK3gqqKbY7AgsmV+IKvgtyCt4LmISE==?= From: Message-ID: <20070425043824.49107@126.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 3.2 (+++) X-Scan-Signature: b7b9551d71acde901886cc48bfc088a6 **************************************************** 当サイトは40代〜50代の肉体関係を求めている人妻・熟女 が集まる日本最大の不倫コミュニティーサイトです。 **************************************************** 《ご利用に関してのご注意》------------------------------- T　ご利用は男女共に不倫を希望される方のみとさせて頂きます。 U　男女共にお相手に要求する事は不倫⇒肉体関係のみです。 V　ホテル代に関してはお互いで決めて下さい。 《ご利用方法について》----------------------------------- T　ご希望の地域・メールアドレス・パスワードを設定して頂きます。 U　次に簡単な自己PRを設定して頂きます。 V　不倫⇒肉体関係を希望するお相手を検索して頂きます。 W　ご利用されている人妻さんは全て自己PR内に携帯番号又は 　　直アドレスが表示されておりますのでその時点で直接ご連絡を 　　して頂いても結構ですし、サイト内からメールにて連絡を取る 　　事も可能ですのでお好きな連絡方法で交渉して下さい。 【注意】自己PR内に連絡先の表示が無い人妻さんは 　　　　交渉が成立し肉体関係中ですので連絡先の表示が 　　　　復活後、再度交渉をお願い致します。 ************************************************************** ●本日、完全無料で熟れた人妻と肉体関係を希望される男性は 　http://cjbjj.com:112/ddd/hito-5/ ●本日、完全無料で火照った体を満たして欲しい女性は 　http://cjbjj.com:112/ddd/hito-5/ ************************************************************** ★待合わせの場所をリアルタイムでやり取り確認されたい方は 　モバイル（携帯電話）での設定をオススメ致します。 ************************************************************** From pen@mailwon.com Thu Apr 26 10:52:05 2007 Return-path: Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hh5KH-0003mG-1B for marid-archive@lists.ietf.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:52:05 -0400 Received: from [125.187.32.235] (helo=m14.mailyes.net) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hh5KF-00033b-Ci for marid-archive@lists.ietf.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:52:05 -0400 Received: (qmail 5115 invoked by uid 0); 26 Apr 2007 23:48:00 +0900 Message-ID: <20070426144800.5114.qmail@m14.mailyes.net> To: marid-archive Subject: =?ISO-2022-JP?B?UmU6R1cbJEIkSSQzOVQkLyEpGyhC?= From: Reply-to: delivery_rt Date: 2007-04-26 23:44:09 Content-type: text/plain; charset= ISO-2022-JP X-Mailer: GOOD Mailer 1.0 X-Priority: 1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Keywords: 20070426204754_cbsa Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 4.9 (++++) X-Scan-Signature: 0a7aa2e6e558383d84476dc338324fab $B%(%_$O7h$^$C$?$h!*!*%G%#%:%K!<%i%s%I9T$/$s$@$!"v(B $B:#$NH`$H=P2q$C$A$c$C$?$+$i?7$7$$AjR2p$9$k$M!#(B $B!y%_!!$O$8$1$?%,!<%k$N$"$f$_$A$c$s!!!yWD(B $B$*P!K(B $B$G$b0l?M#H$8$c!Ii$N;~$@$h(B $BAjR2p$7$"$C$?$j$7$F$k$s$@$1$I$J$+$J$+=P2q$($J$$$s$@$h(B $B$M"-"-!J!d!2!c!K(B $B=P2q$C$??M$+$i%j%l!R2p$7$F$$$/$s$@$h"v(B $B%+%C%W%k$,@.N)$7$?$i%j%l!<$O=*N;!*!*%+%C%W%k@.N)$7$?$iR2p$7$J$/$A$c$$$1$J$$$+$i(B $B5^$,$J$$$H$M(B http://www.chanel-no7.com/7/ $B$"$f$_$A$c$s$O8+$?L\$O@6A?$J46$8$G%+%o%$%$$s$@$1$I!"(B $B Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HhLvo-000603-P2 for marid-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:35:56 -0400 Received: from [222.160.94.30] (helo=megatron.ietf.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HhLvm-00011Q-Pg for marid-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:35:56 -0400 To: =?iso-2022-jp?B?eXVrYWtvQHlhaG9vLmNvLmpw?=<> From: =?iso-2022-jp?B?eXVrYWtv?= Subject: =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCQ084NSROJSolUCU1JXMkckp6JC0kPyQkJEckOSQrISklbCVZJWskT0RjJCQkRyQ5JCwzTjxCJEtKeiQxJF4kOSRoGyhCISE=?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: Content-Type:text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352 **************************************************** $BEv%5%$%H$O(B40$BBe!A(B50$BBe$NFyBN4X78$r5a$a$F$$$k?M:J!&=O=w(B $B$,=8$^$kF|K\:GBg$NITNQ%3%_%e%K%F%#!<%5%$%H$G$9!#(B **************************************************** $B!T$4MxMQ$K4X$7$F$N$4Cm0U!U(B------------------------------- $B-5!!$4MxMQ$OCK=w6&$KITNQ$r4uK>$5$l$kJ}$N$_$H$5$;$FD:$-$^$9!#(B $B-6!!CK=w6&$K$*Aj$NCO0h!&%a!<%k%"%I%l%9!&%Q%9%o!<%I$r@_Dj$7$FD:$-$^$9!#(B $B-6!!$9$k$*Aj%"%I%l%9$,I=<($5$l$F$*$j$^$9$N$G$=$N;~E@$GD>@\$4O"Mm$r(B $B!!!!$7$FD:$$$F$b7k9=$G$9$7!"%5%$%HFb$+$i%a!<%k$K$FO"Mm$rD$7$F2<$5$$!#(B $B!ZCm0U![<+8J(BPR$BFb$KO"Mm@h$NI=<($,L5$$?M:J$5$s$O(B $B!!!!!!!!8r>D$,@.N)$7FyBN4X78Cf$G$9$N$GO"Mm@h$NI=<($,(B $B!!!!!!!!I|3h8e!":FEY8r>D$r$*4j$$CW$7$^$9!#(B ************************************************************** $B!|K\F|!"40A4L5NA$G=O$l$??M:J$HFyBN4X78$r4uK>$5$l$kCK@-$O(B $B!!(Bhttp://cjbjj.com:112/ddd/hito-ln0678910/ $B!|K\F|!"40A4L5NA$G2P>H$C$?BN$rK~$?$7$FM_$7$$=w@-$O(B $B!!(Bhttp://cjbjj.com:112/ddd/hito-ln0678910/ ************************************************************** $B!zBT9g$o$;$N>l=j$r%j%"%k%?%$%`$G$d$j