From dworley@avaya.com Tue Feb 7 08:34:23 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mediactrl@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mediactrl@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F5921F883E for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 08:34:23 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.35 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.35 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.249, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nba2btZUJcU0 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 08:34:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EEEB21F8834 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 08:34:21 -0800 (PST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAC5SMU/GmAcF/2dsb2JhbABDr1WBBYFyAQEBAQIBEgsdRA0BFQUkQhcQBBsah1oJmgeEF5wYiysBBQEBAQEKCREFAjECAQUFBoMegROCdmMEiEaSYI0B X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,377,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="290052399" Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2012 11:34:20 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO DC-US1HCEX3.global.avaya.com) ([135.11.52.22]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2012 11:28:27 -0500 Received: from DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com ([169.254.1.137]) by DC-US1HCEX3.global.avaya.com ([135.11.52.22]) with mapi; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 11:34:19 -0500 From: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" To: "mediactrl@ietf.org" Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 11:34:19 -0500 Thread-Topic: WGLC on draft-ietf-mediactrl-mrb-12 until 21 Feb 2012 Thread-Index: AQHM5bZWHNLum4lKuU+Oa8CFUAlg8A== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [MEDIACTRL] WGLC on draft-ietf-mediactrl-mrb-12 until 21 Feb 2012 X-BeenThere: mediactrl@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Media Control WG Discussion List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:34:23 -0000 Eric and I are announcing a Working Group Last Call for this draft: draft-ietf-mediactrl-mrb-12.txt which can be found at http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mediactrl-mrb/ The Working Group Last Call will last two weeks, so please send your commen= ts before February 21st. The authors have improved much of the description, and cleaned up a few tec= hnical issues, so please review carefully. Please be aware of the IPR disclosures regarding this draft (numbers 897, 8= 98, and 899). They can be found at=20 https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=3Ddocument_search&document_= search=3Ddraft-ietf-mediactrl-mrb Comments regarding the impact of the IPR disclosures on the draft are invit= ed. For the XML - Lorenzo has validated the XML schemas using Eclipse and XML S= py. If you validate against a different validator, it would be helpful if y= ou let me/Eric know, because this will be a question that we answer in the = shepherd writeup. Thanks, Dale, as WG co-chair > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts direct= ories. This draft is a work item of the Media Server Control Working Group = of the IETF. > > Title : Media Resource Brokering > Author(s) : Chris Boulton > Lorenzo Miniero > Gary Munson > Filename : draft-ietf-mediactrl-mrb-12.txt > Pages : 138 > Date : 2012-01-09 > > The MediaCtrl work group in the IETF has proposed an architecture for > controlling media services. The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) is > used as the signalling protocol which provides many inherent > capabilities for message routing. In addition to such signalling > properties, a need exists for intelligent, application level media > service selection based on non-static signalling properties. This is > especially true when considered in conjunction with deployment > architectures that include 1:M and M:N combinations of Application > Servers and Media Servers. This document introduces a Media Resource > Broker (MRB) entity which manages the availability of Media Servers > and the media resource demands of Application Servers. The document > includes potential deployment options for an MRB and appropriate > interfaces to Application Servers and Media Servers. From internet-drafts@ietf.org Tue Feb 14 11:37:31 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mediactrl@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mediactrl@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C964E21F84B5; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:37:31 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.588 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.588 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id whpewyHl9115; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:37:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5570721F845F; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:37:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.64p2 Message-ID: <20120214193727.27641.56163.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:37:27 -0800 Cc: mediactrl@ietf.org Subject: [MEDIACTRL] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mediactrl-6231-iana-00.txt X-BeenThere: mediactrl@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Media Control WG Discussion List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:37:32 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Media Server Control Working Group of= the IETF. Title : IANA Registry for MEDIACTRL Interactive Voice Response C= ontrol Package Author(s) : Eric Burger Filename : draft-ietf-mediactrl-6231-iana-00.txt Pages : 7 Date : 2012-02-14 This document creates an IANA registry for the response codes for the MEDIACTRL Interactive Voice Response Control Package, RFC6231. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mediactrl-6231-iana-00.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mediactrl-6231-iana-00.txt From eburger@standardstrack.com Tue Feb 14 15:48:30 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mediactrl@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mediactrl@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5131F0C44 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:48:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.396 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.203, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t1KaI+ooin6Q for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:48:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from biz104.inmotionhosting.com (biz104.inmotionhosting.com [173.247.254.120]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110251F0C43 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:48:28 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=standardstrack.com; h=Received:From:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:To:References:Message-Id:X-Mailer:X-Source:X-Source-Args:X-Source-Dir; b=OQ8+b2wRd3+8qWjLchvHXo0fFz7LGNTlLW9x1Gvfs8ZpqwxQYTGhbJdhHBvZYBgh61VYl0KREABK46ucTY5Ckno3v8fCb0rnp2ho4l4DMHd3pIizUxV0tigvpJ5nHpkW; Received: from ip68-100-199-8.dc.dc.cox.net ([68.100.199.8]:63213 helo=[192.168.15.135]) by biz104.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RxS6k-0007uc-K4 for mediactrl@ietf.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:48:27 -0800 From: Eric Burger Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-287-916270859; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1 Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:48:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20120214193727.27641.56163.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> To: mediactrl@ietf.org References: <20120214193727.27641.56163.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Message-Id: <9207239F-B743-47A8-B583-6B6E18280D65@standardstrack.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz104.inmotionhosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - standardstrack.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: [MEDIACTRL] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mediactrl-6231-iana-00.txt X-BeenThere: mediactrl@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Media Control WG Discussion List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:48:30 -0000 --Apple-Mail-287-916270859 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii What's this about? It turns out that RFC6231 talks about an IANA = registry for response codes, lays out a table for response codes, and = even has rules for registering new response codes. However, we forgot = to tell IANA to create the registry! This document instructs IANA to create the registry, does the initial = population, and reiterates the rules. The Chairs and AD made an executive decision and skipped a separate = WGLC. You can still comment on the document during IETF LC, which will = happen shortly. On Feb 14, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote: >=20 > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts = directories. This draft is a work item of the Media Server Control = Working Group of the IETF. >=20 > Title : IANA Registry for MEDIACTRL Interactive Voice = Response Control Package > Author(s) : Eric Burger > Filename : draft-ietf-mediactrl-6231-iana-00.txt > Pages : 7 > Date : 2012-02-14 >=20 > This document creates an IANA registry for the response codes for = the > MEDIACTRL Interactive Voice Response Control Package, RFC6231. >=20 >=20 > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > = http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mediactrl-6231-iana-00.txt >=20 > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >=20 > This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: > = ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mediactrl-6231-iana-00.txt >=20 > _______________________________________________ > MEDIACTRL mailing list > MEDIACTRL@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mediactrl > Supplemental Web Site: > http://www.standardstrack.com/ietf/mediactrl --Apple-Mail-287-916270859 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIPODCCBN0w ggPFoAMCAQICEHGS++YZX6xNEoV0cTSiGKcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwezELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0Ix GzAZBgNVBAgMEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBwwHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UECgwR Q29tb2RvIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxITAfBgNVBAMMGEFBQSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTZXJ2aWNlczAeFw0w NDAxMDEwMDAwMDBaFw0yODEyMzEyMzU5NTlaMIGuMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzELMAkGA1UECBMCVVQx FzAVBgNVBAcTDlNhbHQgTGFrZSBDaXR5MR4wHAYDVQQKExVUaGUgVVNFUlRSVVNUIE5ldHdvcmsx ITAfBgNVBAsTGGh0dHA6Ly93d3cudXNlcnRydXN0LmNvbTE2MDQGA1UEAxMtVVROLVVTRVJGaXJz dC1DbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIEVtYWlsMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8A MIIBCgKCAQEAsjmFpPJ9q0E7YkY3rs3BYHW8OWX5ShpHornMSMxqmNVNNRm5pELlzkniii8efNIx B8dOtINknS4p1aJkxIW9hVE1eaROaJB7HHqkkqgX8pgV8pPMyaQylbsMTzC9mKALi+VuG6JG+ni8 om+rWV6lL8/K2m2qL+usobNqqrcuZzWLeeEeaYji5kbNoKXqvgvOdjp6Dpvq/NonWz1zHyLmSGHG TPNpsaguG7bUMSAsvIKKjqQOpdeJQ/wWWq8dcdcRWdq6hw2v+vPhwvCkxWeM1tZUOt4KpLoDd7Nl yP0e03RiqhjKaJMeoYV+9Udly/hNVyh00jT/MLbu9mIwFIws6wIDAQABo4IBJzCCASMwHwYDVR0j BBgwFoAUoBEKIz6W8Qfs4q8p74Klf9AwpLQwHQYDVR0OBBYEFImCZ33EnSZwAEu0UEh83j2uBG59 MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBBjAPBgNVHRMBAf8EBTADAQH/MB0GA1UdJQQWMBQGCCsGAQUFBwMCBggr BgEFBQcDBDARBgNVHSAECjAIMAYGBFUdIAAwewYDVR0fBHQwcjA4oDagNIYyaHR0cDovL2NybC5j b21vZG9jYS5jb20vQUFBQ2VydGlmaWNhdGVTZXJ2aWNlcy5jcmwwNqA0oDKGMGh0dHA6Ly9jcmwu Y29tb2RvLm5ldC9BQUFDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZVNlcnZpY2VzLmNybDARBglghkgBhvhCAQEEBAMCAQYw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAJ2Vyzy4fqUJxB6/C8LHdo45PJTGEKpPDMngq4RdiVTgZTvzbRx8 NywlVF+WIfw3hJGdFdwUT4HPVB1rbEVgxy35l1FM+WbKPKCCjKbI8OLp1Er57D9Wyd12jMOCAU9s APMeGmF0BEcDqcZAV5G8ZSLFJ2dPV9tkWtmNH7qGL/QGrpxp7en0zykX2OBKnxogL5dMUbtGB8SK N04g4wkxaMeexIud6H4RvDJoEJYRmETYKlFgTYjrdDrfQwYyyDlWjDoRUtNBpEMD9O3vMyfbOeAU TibJ2PU54om4k123KSZB6rObroP8d3XK6Mq1/uJlSmM+RMTQw16Hc6mYHK9/FX8wggUaMIIEAqAD AgECAhBtGeqnGU9qMyLmIjJ6qnHeMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIGuMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzELMAkG A1UECBMCVVQxFzAVBgNVBAcTDlNhbHQgTGFrZSBDaXR5MR4wHAYDVQQKExVUaGUgVVNFUlRSVVNU IE5ldHdvcmsxITAfBgNVBAsTGGh0dHA6Ly93d3cudXNlcnRydXN0LmNvbTE2MDQGA1UEAxMtVVRO LVVTRVJGaXJzdC1DbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIEVtYWlsMB4XDTExMDQyODAwMDAw MFoXDTIwMDUzMDEwNDgzOFowgZMxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNo ZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMTkwNwYD VQQDEzBDT01PRE8gQ2xpZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBTZWN1cmUgRW1haWwgQ0EwggEi MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQCShIRbS1eY1F4vi6ThQMijU1hfZmXxMk73nzJ9 VdB4TFW3QpTg+SdxB8XGaaS5MsTxQBqQzCdWYn8XtXFpruUgG+TLY15gyqJB9mrho/+43x9IbWVD jCouK2M4d9+xF6zC2oIC1tQyatRnbyATj1w1+uVUgK/YcQodNwoCUFNslR2pEBS0mZVZEjH/CaLS TNxS297iQAFbSGjdxUq04O0kHzqvcV8H46y/FDuwJXFoPfQP1hdYRhWBPGiLi4MPbXohV+Y0sNsy fuNK4aVScmQmkU6lkg//4LFg/RpvaFGZY40ai6XMQpubfSJj06mg/M6ekN9EGfRcWzW6FvOnm//B AgMBAAGjggFLMIIBRzAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBSJgmd9xJ0mcABLtFBIfN49rgRufTAdBgNVHQ4EFgQU ehNOAHRbxnhjZCfBL+KgW7x5xXswDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgEGMBIGA1UdEwEB/wQIMAYBAf8CAQAw EQYDVR0gBAowCDAGBgRVHSAAMFgGA1UdHwRRME8wTaBLoEmGR2h0dHA6Ly9jcmwudXNlcnRydXN0 LmNvbS9VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uYW5kRW1haWwuY3JsMHQGCCsG AQUFBwEBBGgwZjA9BggrBgEFBQcwAoYxaHR0cDovL2NydC51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tL1VUTkFkZFRy dXN0Q2xpZW50X0NBLmNydDAlBggrBgEFBQcwAYYZaHR0cDovL29jc3AudXNlcnRydXN0LmNvbTAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEAhda+eFdVbTN/RFL+QtUGqAEDgIr7DbL9Sr/2r0FJ9RtaxdKtG3Nu PukmfOZMmMEwKN/L+0I8oSU+CnXW0D05hmbRoZu1TZtvryhsHa/l6nRaqNqxwPF1ei+eupN5yv7i kR5WdLL4jdPgQ3Ib7Y/9YDkgR/uLrzplSDyYPaUlv73vYOBJ5RbI6z9Dg/Dg7g3B080zX5vQvWBq szv++tTJOjwf7Zv/m0kzvkIpOYPuM2kugp1FTahp2oAbHj3SGl18R5mlmwhtEpmG1l1XBxunML5L SUS4kH7K0Xk467Qz+qA6XSZYnmFVGLQh1ZnV4ENAQjC+6qXnlNKw/vN1+X9u5zCCBTUwggQdoAMC AQICEDWub7CYfsGXUhthgY5vuwcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwgZMxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYD VQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9E TyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMTkwNwYDVQQDEzBDT01PRE8gQ2xpZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBT ZWN1cmUgRW1haWwgQ0EwHhcNMTEwOTA5MDAwMDAwWhcNMTIwOTA4MjM1OTU5WjArMSkwJwYJKoZI hvcNAQkBFhplYnVyZ2VyQHN0YW5kYXJkc3RyYWNrLmNvbTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEP ADCCAQoCggEBAML1VN+kPTw2iXeq1Yag6nChmCSmvCGACE3X9APNsUP2GvbYNFj6qdkayJJdhy0T aIzCiMW01sD5mSV4mi0w8EfXKn/cwqi1Brw06fwaI4T2iGXA/0zb272GR57uoH1VjMd0/Qc1h2CJ 9ueUwsxP9ufXm7Kb9+DkLGDAU+6jQQv9rTiNz8sSyjOTSmtrsVpk5MTRn0np6fybkyxcjNy2cLTX 56+gfF4SxgukWt0XAWI49y+PAp2AyG9RxX/1kTZPCEPLzitGpDTGPN7HH9sdvXyyhNT73i20BtZ0 FHRfhLIo1bRqnl3W06JjVOkNbUxFbE4p01FrF7O/kRk+WZ+FMVcCAwEAAaOCAeowggHmMB8GA1Ud IwQYMBaAFHoTTgB0W8Z4Y2QnwS/ioFu8ecV7MB0GA1UdDgQWBBSMC0QogJ7C8csD5XuRaGotm7qC mDAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCBaAwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADAgBgNVHSUEGTAXBggrBgEFBQcDBAYLKwYB BAGyMQEDBQIwEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgUgMEYGA1UdIAQ/MD0wOwYMKwYBBAGyMQECAQEBMCsw KQYIKwYBBQUHAgEWHWh0dHBzOi8vc2VjdXJlLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQ1BTMFcGA1UdHwRQME4wTKBK oEiGRmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tL0NPTU9ET0NsaWVudEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uYW5k U2VjdXJlRW1haWxDQS5jcmwwgYgGCCsGAQUFBwEBBHwwejBSBggrBgEFBQcwAoZGaHR0cDovL2Ny dC5jb21vZG9jYS5jb20vQ09NT0RPQ2xpZW50QXV0aGVudGljYXRpb25hbmRTZWN1cmVFbWFpbENB LmNydDAkBggrBgEFBQcwAYYYaHR0cDovL29jc3AuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tMCUGA1UdEQQeMByBGmVi dXJnZXJAc3RhbmRhcmRzdHJhY2suY29tMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQATedFpXp5JcVGrEipp KirfegdjPe823Noihn8K6Em01BbEuUsPgHVY/a/6v0UNICBEAuQCwF4aJxuxSBN2GZ6XasVvlg+R nMnJP6ZZLkd8QmRSmt/AyzxCXkDQdPEJ41+ioNUmVpnGHtHliaT8yEF9EwmMDsy+efbjWomPIx5P e6MWJX/W2qQ60WhPQxD1U+3VbqWYtn6j9M89JpgQyjYku8C+oOuFUnZskIjbnWMsB3ahHEUympe0 okQT0frCohstkscVkhk63zLmHaUmhKGrJvVwFK+RBBAzuVJcwmEvQqsrczwtlO5E/Qr729Kbch6A JfmJZ7fJIL1+RbB7ORZNMYIDqzCCA6cCAQEwgagwgZMxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJH cmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBDQSBM aW1pdGVkMTkwNwYDVQQDEzBDT01PRE8gQ2xpZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBTZWN1cmUg RW1haWwgQ0ECEDWub7CYfsGXUhthgY5vuwcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAdcwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsG CSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMTIwMjE0MjM0ODI1WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQU 6twGOXEfknXcqaF4KULzoLXKTjEwgbkGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDGBqzCBqDCBkzELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0Ix GzAZBgNVBAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMR Q09NT0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxOTA3BgNVBAMTMENPTU9ETyBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24g YW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQQIQNa5vsJh+wZdSG2GBjm+7BzCBuwYLKoZIhvcNAQkQAgsxgaug gagwgZMxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcT B1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMTkwNwYDVQQDEzBDT01PRE8gQ2xp ZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBTZWN1cmUgRW1haWwgQ0ECEDWub7CYfsGXUhthgY5vuwcw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEggEAMfLBAaGtCY99WfYNtcW18Nv6wdjWm6OtvxK2xKCGXrsAYfMgycK9 7kheuOIYTrRnDZHmbo52Ofnc/QkeLTGoqWSAFOJ+7GB95Trv53u9xP5CPvzRNmgd/Q0S7ooUkJiF A5GUE+psQPmEcvZdfnZrnf0Kz1UsCd6Wf7C3QlIULoirvzdJ9bX4Yg3g7oTj1LfsPW4qZAr94reD 3qMUgiLWi74IcnvwxO+moMbO60GZpuig68CPlmhT061Cq/H6UxE0tpXfcXx/1Oi+5meeK8MmWqP1 qInB6nv40UR6kNRnmXkoW6MoND0eFP8++kc3Y4Md3jWk0T8lwgOO4LhfhdWT2gAAAAAAAA== --Apple-Mail-287-916270859-- From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Thu Feb 23 16:05:42 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mediactrl@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mediactrl@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E8021F88AA; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:05:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.472 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.472 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.127, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kwg5toTUMmrC; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:05:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1EA21F88A0; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:05:42 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.64p2 Message-ID: <20120224000542.10845.58537.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:05:42 -0800 Cc: mediactrl@ietf.org Subject: [MEDIACTRL] Last Call: (IANA Registry for MEDIACTRL Interactive Voice Response Control Package) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: mediactrl@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: Media Control WG Discussion List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:05:42 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the Media Server Control WG (mediactrl) to consider the following document: - 'IANA Registry for MEDIACTRL Interactive Voice Response Control Package' as a Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2012-03-08. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document creates an IANA registry for the response codes for the MEDIACTRL Interactive Voice Response Control Package, RFC6231. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mediactrl-6231-iana/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mediactrl-6231-iana/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. From dworley@avaya.com Mon Feb 27 13:45:58 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mediactrl@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mediactrl@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0065521E801A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:45:58 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.436 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.436 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.163, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gtCqS6axspps for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:45:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE1821E800C for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:45:55 -0800 (PST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAEj4S0/GmAcF/2dsb2JhbABDs3uBB4F6EigxAx0BFQUkQhcQBBsah2QLn3eEF5Q7jHgHAgEDAgIHBgIDAQIJAQMCBgMDAgoCDQkDCRmFGAMkHQeCbWMEiE+SbY0NgTgHCQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,493,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="293676800" Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2012 16:45:53 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO DC-US1HCEX3.global.avaya.com) ([135.11.52.22]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2012 16:38:51 -0500 Received: from DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com ([169.254.2.202]) by DC-US1HCEX3.global.avaya.com ([135.11.52.22]) with mapi; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:45:52 -0500 From: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" To: "mediactrl@ietf.org" Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:45:05 -0500 Thread-Topic: Document Shepherd Writeup for draft-ietf-mediactrl-mrb-12. Thread-Index: AQHM9ZksbInd6Bmr0E6ZiBkwuozlMw== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [MEDIACTRL] Document Shepherd Writeup for draft-ietf-mediactrl-mrb-12. X-BeenThere: mediactrl@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Media Control WG Discussion List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:45:58 -0000 This version [of the document writeup form] is dated September 17, 2008. (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the=20 document and, in particular, does he or she believe this=20 version is ready for forwarding to the IESG for publication?=20 The document shepherd is Dale Worley (a co-chair of Mediactrl). In my opinion, the revision -12 is ready for publication. (1.b) Has the document had adequate review both from key WG members=20 and from key non-WG members? Does the Document Shepherd have=20 any concerns about the depth or breadth of the reviews that=20 have been performed? =20 I believe the document has had adequate review. People in the WG and representatives of major application server and media server vendors have contributed to and reviewed this document in meetings, mailing lists and extra MediaCtrl sessions. At least one vendor has built an MRB to this specification. (1.c) Does the Document Shepherd have concerns that the document=20 needs more review from a particular or broader perspective,=20 e.g., security, operational complexity, someone familiar with=20 AAA, internationalization or XML?=20 I have no such concerns. The only plausible concern is that the protocol seems to be overly complex, in that it allows several different modes of operation for broadly similar actions. But the people involved in the draft are involved in practical deployments, and I am sure that they have found the various alternatives in the protocol are necessary in various practical situations. (1.d) Does the Document Shepherd have any specific concerns or=20 issues with this document that the Responsible Area Director and/or the IESG should be aware of? For example, perhaps he=20 or she is uncomfortable with certain parts of the document, or=20 has concerns whether there really is a need for it. In any=20 event, if the WG has discussed those issues and has indicated=20 that it still wishes to advance the document, detail those=20 concerns here. Has an IPR disclosure related to this document=20 been filed? If so, please include a reference to the=20 disclosure and summarize the WG discussion and conclusion on=20 this issue.=20 I have no such concerns. Specifically regarding IPR: AT&T has filed 3 IPR disclosures regarding the predecessor draft, draft-boulton-mediactrl-mrb: ID # 897, ID # 898, and ID # 899. AT&T is listed as offering RAND licensing terms. The IPR disclosures were submitted in 2007. The chairs solicited feedback from the WG twice, in 2007 and 2008. There seems to have been no response to the solilcitation and no further discussion of the IPR issues on any IETF mailing list, suggesting that no controversy ensued. I would expect that any implementors who worried that the IPR would be burdensome would have spoken up. Neither of the chairs at the time (Eric Burger and Spencer Dawkins), nor two of the three authors (Chris Boulton and Lorenzo Miniero) work for AT&T, so there seems to be no reason to suspect undue influence of AT&T to promote its commercial interests. (The third author, Gary Munson, does work for AT&T.) The WGLC of 7 Feb 2012 specifically mentioned the IPR disclosures, to provide a last opportunity for implementors to express any concerns over the IPR situation. No objections were raised regarding IPR. (1.e) How solid is the WG consensus behind this document? Does it=20 represent the strong concurrence of a few individuals, with=20 others being silent, or does the WG as a whole understand and=20 agree with it? =20 A WGLC was given on the -02 version on 15 Dec 2009. It received no responses. A final WGLC on the -12 version was given on 7 Feb 2012. It received no responses either. (1.f) Has anyone threatened an appeal or otherwise indicated extreme=20 discontent? If so, please summarise the areas of conflict in=20 separate email messages to the Responsible Area Director. (It=20 should be in a separate email because this questionnaire is=20 entered into the ID Tracker.)=20 None that I can find any record of. (1.g) Has the Document Shepherd personally verified that the=20 document satisfies all ID nits? (See the Internet-Drafts Checklist= =20 and http://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/). Boilerplate checks are=20 not enough; this check needs to be thorough. Has the document=20 met all formal review criteria it needs to, such as the MIB=20 Doctor, media type and URI type reviews?=20 "Registration of application/mrb-publish+xml and application/mrb-consumer+xml" was sent to ietf-types on 19 Jan 2012. Two responses were received from one person. The comments were minor editorial matters which I believe do not require change to the draft. (1.h) Has the document split its references into normative and=20 informative? Are there normative references to documents that=20 are not ready for advancement or are otherwise in an unclear=20 state? If such normative references exist, what is the=20 strategy for their completion? Are there normative references=20 that are downward references, as described in [RFC3967]? If=20 so, list these downward references to support the Area=20 Director in the Last Call procedure for them [RFC3967].=20 Yes -- the nits tool (http://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/) is happy with the draft. (1.i) Has the Document Shepherd verified that the document IANA=20 consideration section exists and is consistent with the body=20 of the document? If the document specifies protocol=20 extensions, are reservations requested in appropriate IANA=20 registries? Are the IANA registries clearly identified? If=20 the document creates a new registry, does it define the=20 proposed initial contents of the registry and an allocation=20 procedure for future registrations? Does it suggest a=20 reasonable name for the new registry? See [RFC5226]. If the=20 document describes an Expert Review process has Shepherd=20 conferred with the Responsible Area Director so that the IESG=20 can appoint the needed Expert during the IESG Evaluation?=20 Yes. (1.j) Has the Document Shepherd verified that sections of the=20 document that are written in a formal language, such as XML=20 code, BNF rules, MIB definitions, etc., validate correctly in=20 an automated checker?=20 Yes. One author (Lorenzo Miniero) checked the schemas using Eclipse and XML Spy, and validated the examples using a JAXB-based tool. (1.k) The IESG approval announcement includes a Document=20 Announcement Write-Up. Please provide such a Document=20 Announcement Write-Up? Recent examples can be found in the "Action" announcements for approved documents. The approval=20 announcement contains the following sections:=20 Technical Summary The MediaCtrl work group in the IETF has proposed an architecture for controlling media services. The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) is used as the signalling protocol which provides many inherent capabilities for message routing. A need exists for intelligent, application level media service selection based on non-static signalling properties, especially in deployment architectures that include 1:M and M:N combinations of Application Servers and Media Servers. This document introduces a Media Resource Broker (MRB) entity which manages the availability of Media Servers and the media resource demands of Application Servers. The document includes potential deployment options for an MRB and appropriate interfaces to Application Servers and Media Servers. Working Group Summary The working group consensus on this document is solid. Two WGLCs were held, one after the initial consensus on the document, and one after extensive review and implemention experience dictated a number of small improvements to the protocol and its description. Document Quality The protocol described in this document has been implemented by several major vendors. The description has also been carefully reviewed by someone not involved in its writing or implementation. Personnel Dale Worley is the document's shepherd. Robert Sparks is the responsible AD.