From s.riazi@payaco.com Sat Apr 9 04:46:31 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: megaco@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: megaco@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D93312D5CD; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 04:46:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NcUUSfHS6zV8; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 04:46:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.payaco.com (mail.payaco.com [37.156.28.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A090412D15F; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 04:46:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.payaco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA6D2045FF; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 16:12:18 +0430 (IRDT) Received: from mail.payaco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.payaco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 1nu5_J4nA3iO; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 16:12:18 +0430 (IRDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.payaco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7A4204608; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 16:12:17 +0430 (IRDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at payaco.com Received: from mail.payaco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.payaco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 5E4hJGkbC7da; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 16:12:17 +0430 (IRDT) Received: from mail.payaco.com (mail.payaco.com [37.156.28.40]) by mail.payaco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93A22045FF; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 16:12:17 +0430 (IRDT) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 16:12:17 +0430 (IRDT) From: "shahrzad.riazi" To: megaco@ietf.org, megaco-request@ietf.org Message-ID: <193422051.26101.1460202137795.JavaMail.zimbra@payaco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_26100_857462087.1460202137795" X-Originating-IP: [37.156.28.40] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.5.1_GA_3056 (ZimbraWebClient - GC51 (Win)/8.5.1_GA_3056) Thread-Topic: h.248 HUAWEI ONU Thread-Index: eLwZl/a+ypkq8swXzHiyV4IXRJndeQ== Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:56:34 -0700 Subject: [Megaco] h.248 HUAWEI ONU X-BeenThere: megaco@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Media Gateway Control List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 12:04:20 -0000 ------=_Part_26100_857462087.1460202137795 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, we are developing our own softswitch, containing h.248 protocol stack. we are trying to connect it to huawei ONU-F01E200, we are facing problem that takes a lot of time and still can not solve it. the interface state is normal right now and the termination state is also normal when we display informations on ONU, but after termination offhook on the MG side, no al/of notify packet will transfer to softswitch and user get busy tone on the phone. and also a following failure alarm appears on ONU: ! EVENT MAJOR 2016-04-09 11:18:53 ALARM NAME : DSP resources insufficient PARAMETERS :FRAME No. :0; Slot No. :6; Port No. :0 the wireshark trace h.248 packets are as following )9hExZ?Kd}!/1 [ 172.16.24.211 ]:2944 T=386220287{C=-{SC=ROOT{SV{MT=RS,V=1,RE="901",20160409T11172491}}}} >B)9EM@@aK9!!/1 [ 172.16.24.75 ]:2944 P=386220287{C=-{SC=root}} >B)9EY@@UKE!/1 [ 172.16.24.75 ]:2944 T=38{C=-{MF=*{E=369099777{al/*},SG}}} )9>BEK[@K7!/1 [ 172.16.24.211 ]:2944 P=38{C=-{MF=A0,MF=A1}} )9>BEe\@KQ"!/1 [ 172.16.24.211 ]:2944 T=1{C=-{N=ROOT{OE=0{20160409T11182893:it/ito}}}} >B)9ED@@jK08!/1 [ 172.16.24.75 ]:2944 P=1{C=-{N=root}} )9>BEj]@KV-t!/1 [ 172.16.24.211 ]:2944 T=2{C=-{N=A0{OE=369099777{20160409T11185294:al/on}}}} >B)9EB@@lK.!/1 [ 172.16.24.75 ]:2944 P=2{C=-{N=a0}} I would really appreciate it if you could help us with this situation, we will be waiting for you help and suggestions Thanks and Regards, Shahrzad Riazi Paya Communication Industries Developer Team ------=_Part_26100_857462087.1460202137795 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

we are developing our own softswitch, contain= ing h.248 protocol stack. we are trying to connect it to huawei ONU-F01E200= , we are facing problem that takes a lot of time and still can not solve it= . 
 the interface state = is normal right now and the termination state is also normal when we displa= y informations on ONU, but after termination offhook on the MG side, no al/= of notify packet will transfer to softswitch and user get busy tone on the = phone. and also a following failure alarm appears on ONU:

! EVENT MA= JOR 2016= -04-09 11:18:53 ALARM NAME : DSP resources insufficient PARAMET= ERS :FRAME No. :0; Slot No. :6; Port No. :0

the wireshark trace h.248 pack= ets are as following

)9hExZ?Kd}!/1 [172.16.24.211]:2944 T=3D386220287{C=3D-{SC=3DROOT{SV{MT= =3DRS,V=3D1,RE=3D"901",20160409T11172491}}}}
>B)9EM@@aK9!!/1 [172.16.24.75]:2944 P=3D3862= 20287{C=3D-{SC=3Droot}}
>B)9EY@@UKE!/1 [172.16.24.75]:2944 T=3D38{C=3D-{MF=3D*{E=3D3690= 99777{al/*},SG}}}
)9>BEK[@K7!/1 [172.16.24.211]:2944 P=3D38{C=3D-{MF=3DA0,MF=3DA1}}
= )9>BEe\@KQ"!/1 [172.16.24.= 211]:2944 T=3D1{C=3D-{N=3DROOT{OE=3D0{20160409T11182893:it/ito}}= }}
>B)9ED@@jK08!/1 [172.1= 6.24.75]:2944 P=3D1{C=3D-{N=3Droot}}
)9>BEj]@KV-t!/1 [172.16.24.211]:2944 = T=3D2{C=3D-{N=3DA0{OE=3D369099777{20160409T11185294:al/on}}}}
>B)9EB@= @lK.!/1 [172.16.24.75]:2944 P=3D2{C=3D-{N=3Da0}}

I would really appreciate it if you could help us with t= his situation,
we will be w= aiting for you help and suggestions

Thanks and Regards,

Shahrzad Riazi
Paya Communication Industries <= /div>
Developer Team
------=_Part_26100_857462087.1460202137795-- From nobody Mon Apr 18 01:25:22 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: megaco@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: megaco@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A44D12E050; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 03:42:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.896 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eSQz6laPUZkc; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 03:42:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.payaco.com (mail.payaco.com [37.156.28.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D0BD12DF93; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 03:42:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.payaco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E9A9200AFC; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:10:10 +0430 (IRDT) Received: from mail.payaco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.payaco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id i9CsQuaUGrWU; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:10:09 +0430 (IRDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.payaco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0668200C97; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:10:09 +0430 (IRDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at payaco.com Received: from mail.payaco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.payaco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id nACkr64r6v-6; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:10:09 +0430 (IRDT) Received: from mail.payaco.com (mail.payaco.com [37.156.28.40]) by mail.payaco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79098200AFC; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:10:09 +0430 (IRDT) Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:10:09 +0430 (IRDT) From: "shahrzad.riazi" To: megaco-request@ietf.org, megaco@ietf.org Message-ID: <492911310.53499.1460803209448.JavaMail.zimbra@payaco.com> In-Reply-To: <321141641.53491.1460803141890.JavaMail.zimbra@payaco.com> References: <193422051.26101.1460202137795.JavaMail.zimbra@payaco.com> <2099451166.26140.1460202963668.JavaMail.zimbra@payaco.com> <321141641.53491.1460803141890.JavaMail.zimbra@payaco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_53498_917424191.1460803209447" X-Originating-IP: [37.156.28.40] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.5.1_GA_3056 (ZimbraWebClient - GC51 (Win)/8.5.1_GA_3056) Thread-Topic: h.248 HUAWEI ONU Thread-Index: eLwZl/a+ypkq8swXzHiyV4IXRJndeRx6id0W0p3YlbJk3vgs5w== Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 01:25:21 -0700 Subject: [Megaco] h.248 HUAWEI ONU X-BeenThere: megaco@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Media Gateway Control List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 10:42:50 -0000 ------=_Part_53498_917424191.1460803209447 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, we are developing our own softswitch, containing h.248 protocol stack. we are trying to connect it to huawei ONU-F01E200, we are facing problem that takes a lot of time and still can not solve it. the interface state is normal right now and the termination state is also normal when we display informations on ONU, but after termination offhook on the MG side, no al/of notify packet will transfer to softswitch and user get busy tone on the phone. and also a following failure alarm appears on ONU: ! EVENT MAJOR 2016-04-09 11:18:53 ALARM NAME : DSP resources insufficient PARAMETERS :FRAME No. :0; Slot No. :6; Port No. :0 the wireshark trace h.248 packets are as following )9hExZ?Kd}!/1 [ 172.16.24.211 ]:2944 T=386220287{C=-{SC=ROOT{SV{MT=RS,V=1,RE="901",20160409T11172491}}}} >B)9EM@@aK9!!/1 [ 172.16.24.75 ]:2944 P=386220287{C=-{SC=root}} >B)9EY@@UKE!/1 [ 172.16.24.75 ]:2944 T=38{C=-{MF=*{E=369099777{al/*},SG}}} )9>BEK[@K7!/1 [ 172.16.24.211 ]:2944 P=38{C=-{MF=A0,MF=A1}} )9>BEe\@KQ"!/1 [ 172.16.24.211 ]:2944 T=1{C=-{N=ROOT{OE=0{20160409T11182893:it/ito}}}} >B)9ED@@jK08!/1 [ 172.16.24.75 ]:2944 P=1{C=-{N=root}} )9>BEj]@KV-t!/1 [ 172.16.24.211 ]:2944 T=2{C=-{N=A0{OE=369099777{20160409T11185294:al/on}}}} >B)9EB@@lK.!/1 [ 172.16.24.75 ]:2944 P=2{C=-{N=a0}} I would really appreciate it if you could help us with this situation, we will be waiting for you help and suggestions Thanks and Regards, Shahrzad Riazi Paya Communication Industries Developer Team ------=_Part_53498_917424191.1460803209447 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable




Hi,
=
we are develo= ping our own softswitch, containing h.248 protocol stack. we are trying to = connect it to huawei ONU-F01E200, we are facing problem that takes a lot of= time and still can not solve it. 
 the interface state is normal right now and the= termination state is also normal when we display informations on ONU, but = after termination offhook on the MG side, no al/of notify packet will trans= fer to softswitch and user get busy tone on the phone. and also a following= failure alarm appears on ONU:

! EVENT MAJOR 2016-04-09 = 11:18:53 ALARM NAME : DSP resources insufficient PARAMETERS :FRAME No. :0; = Slot No. :6; Port No. :0

the wireshark tra= ce h.248 packets are as following

)9hExZ?K= d}!/1 [172.16.24.211<= /a>]:2944 T=3D386220287{C=3D-{SC=3DROOT{SV{MT=3DRS,V=3D1,RE=3D"901",= 20160409T11172491}}}}
>B)9EM@@aK9!!/1 [172.16.24.75]:2944 P=3D386220287{C=3D-{SC= =3Droot}}
>B)9EY@@UKE!/1 [172.16.24.75]:2944 T=3D38{C=3D-{MF=3D*{E=3D369099777{a= l/*},SG}}}
)9>BEK[@K7!/1 [172.16.24.211]:2944 P=3D38{C=3D-{MF=3DA0,MF=3DA1}})9>BEe\@KQ"!/1 [1= 72.16.24.211]:2944 T=3D1{C=3D-{N=3DROOT{OE=3D0{20160409T11182893= :it/ito}}}}
>B)9ED@@jK08!/1 [172.16.24.75]:2944 P=3D1{C=3D-{N=3Droot}}
)9>= BEj]@KV-t!/1 [172.16= .24.211]:2944 T=3D2{C=3D-{N=3DA0{OE=3D369099777{20160409T1118529= 4:al/on}}}}
>B)9EB@@lK.!/1 [172.16.24.75]:2944 P=3D2{C=3D-{N=3Da0}}

I would really appreciate it if you could help us= with this situation,
we will be waiting for you help and suggestions

Thanks and Regards,

Sha= hrzad Riazi
Paya C= ommunication Industries 
Developer Team

<= /div>
------=_Part_53498_917424191.1460803209447-- From nobody Tue Apr 26 01:22:46 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: megaco@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: megaco@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB03412B03E for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 01:22:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.921 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P3fIktL0dMCn for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 01:22:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12CF712D0EB for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 01:22:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712umx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.210.45]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 1C55A49643D07; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 08:22:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by fr712umx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO-o) with ESMTP id u3Q8MVkX006797 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 26 Apr 2016 08:22:32 GMT Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u3Q8MJB9026246 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:22:31 +0200 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.187]) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.112]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:22:24 +0200 From: "Schwarz, Albrecht (Nokia - DE)" To: "megaco@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [H.248.50 (Rev)]: contributions submitted Thread-Index: AdGflGE3+H9TZdOWTgmD4luOeWv2pA== Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 08:22:24 +0000 Message-ID: <786615F3A85DF44AA2A76164A71FE1ACE1A43789@FR711WXCHMBA03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.38] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "t13sg16q3@lists.itu.int" Subject: [Megaco] [H.248.50 (Rev)]: contributions submitted X-BeenThere: megaco@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Media Gateway Control List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 08:22:45 -0000 fyi, draft revised H.248.50 is candidate for consent/approval process at th= is SG16 meeting. We've already submitted our contributions in order to finalize the work: http://www.itu.int/md/T13-SG16-160523-C/en=20 [ 1055 ] =A0 Q3/16 H.248.50 (Rev): clauses 1 to 4 - editorial updates =A0 [ 1056 ] =A0 Q3/16 H.248.50 (Rev): consistency check and updates related to= "media latching" =A0 [ 1057 ] =A0 Q3/16 H.248.50 (Rev): clause 6 - completion of missing text = =A0 [ 1058 ] =A0 Q3/16 H.248.50 (Rev): clauses 7 to 10 - editorials and resolut= ion of editor's notes =A0 [ 1059 ] =A0 Q3/16 H.248.50 (Rev): Appendices I to V - editorials and resol= ution of editor's notes =A0 [ 1060 ] =A0 Q3/16 H.248.50 (Rev): new Appendix on ICE restart support =A0 [ 1061 ] =A0 Q3/16 H.248.50 (Rev): Ready for completion? Proposed way of pr= oceeding. =A0 Regards, Albrecht