From rbonica@juniper.net Tue Jul 3 08:05:36 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312D121F8872 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 08:05:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.575 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.575 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NmmsNVFI9xAH for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 08:05:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exprod7og104.obsmtp.com (exprod7og104.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7691421F8871 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 08:05:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob104.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT/MKRo9e31Pv/KcPUpoxh/McQNtE6awp@postini.com; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 08:05:42 PDT Received: from P-CLDFE02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.60) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 08:03:30 -0700 Received: from p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.24) by p-cldfe02-hq.jnpr.net (172.24.192.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 08:03:29 -0700 Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::d0d1:653d:5b91:a123%11]) with mapi; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 11:03:29 -0400 From: Ronald Bonica To: "mib-doctors@ietf.org" Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 11:03:28 -0400 Thread-Topic: Errata against RFC 1628 Thread-Index: Ac1ZLQCcMizmiq2hT6eIGoZk65nVUg== Message-ID: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76F688B4B@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [MIB-DOCTORS] Errata against RFC 1628 X-BeenThere: mib-doctors@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: MIB Doctors list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 15:05:36 -0000 Folks, Could someone please comment on the errata (below) against RFC 1628? Am I c= orrect in assuming that the text in the RFC won't compile at all? -------------------------- Ron Bonica vcard: www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf Errata ID: 3275 Status: Reported Type: Technical Reported By: J=FCrgen Sellinath Date Reported: 2012-07-03 Section 4 says: UPS-MIB DEFINITIONS ::=3D BEGIN IMPORTS MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, NOTIFICATION-TYPE, OBJECT-IDENTITY, Counter32, Gauge32, Integer32 FROM SNMPv2-SMI DisplayString, TimeStamp, TimeInterval, TestAndIncr, AutonomousType FROM SNMPv2-TC MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP FROM SNMPv2-CONF; It should say: UPS-MIB DEFINITIONS ::=3D BEGIN IMPORTS MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, NOTIFICATION-TYPE, OBJECT-IDENTITY, Counter32, Gauge32, Integer32 FROM SNMPv2-SMI DisplayString, TimeStamp, TimeInterval, TestAndIncr, AutonomousType, TEXTUAL-CONVENTION FROM SNMPv2-TC MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP FROM SNMPv2-CONF; Notes: Textual conventions are used within this MIB, but the macro "TEXTUAL-CONVEN= TION" itself is not imported, as it should (RFC 2578 =A73.2). From j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de Tue Jul 3 09:35:25 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C931A21F86D6 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 09:35:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.187 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.062, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ajkwyq8eyEBR for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 09:35:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A71921F86D3 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 09:35:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (demetrius3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.48]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1651D20A13; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:35:32 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X0FLQxI3lDQ3; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:35:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FDE209D7; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:35:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 013C32042AEF; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:35:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:35:30 +0200 From: Juergen Schoenwaelder To: Ronald Bonica Message-ID: <20120703163530.GA2439@elstar.local> Mail-Followup-To: Ronald Bonica , "mib-doctors@ietf.org" References: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76F688B4B@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76F688B4B@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: "mib-doctors@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Errata against RFC 1628 X-BeenThere: mib-doctors@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder List-Id: MIB Doctors list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 16:35:26 -0000 On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 11:03:28AM -0400, Ronald Bonica wrote: > Folks, > > Could someone please comment on the errata (below) against RFC 1628? Am I correct in assuming that the text in the RFC won't compile at all? > Yep. There are also invalid range restrictions: Index: src/libsmi/mibs/ietf/UPS-MIB =================================================================== --- src/libsmi/mibs/ietf/UPS-MIB (revision 706) +++ src/libsmi/mibs/ietf/UPS-MIB (working copy) @@ -1013,7 +1013,7 @@ ::= { upsControl 1 } upsShutdownAfterDelay OBJECT-TYPE - SYNTAX INTEGER (-1..2147483648) + SYNTAX INTEGER (-1..2147483647) UNITS "seconds" MAX-ACCESS read-write STATUS current @@ -1041,7 +1041,7 @@ ::= { upsControl 2 } upsStartupAfterDelay OBJECT-TYPE - SYNTAX INTEGER (-1..2147483648) + SYNTAX INTEGER (-1..2147483647) UNITS "seconds" MAX-ACCESS read-write STATUS current No, I am too lazy to file erratas at the moment... /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 From rbonica@juniper.net Tue Jul 3 12:28:50 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A3611E8170 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:28:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.576 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.576 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZD5bki3CXnV3 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:28:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exprod7og106.obsmtp.com (exprod7og106.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283D521F85A3 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:28:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob106.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT/NH95x44hhZASjTWNUKixaVxBBNljpn@postini.com; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 12:28:58 PDT Received: from p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.24) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:27:12 -0700 Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::d0d1:653d:5b91:a123%11]) with mapi; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 15:27:11 -0400 From: Ronald Bonica To: Juergen Schoenwaelder Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 15:27:10 -0400 Thread-Topic: [MIB-DOCTORS] Errata against RFC 1628 Thread-Index: Ac1ZOd9O4NCo3vDISu6X3X1KxtzKJwAF98vg Message-ID: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76F8A86DD@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> References: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76F688B4B@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <20120703163530.GA2439@elstar.local> In-Reply-To: <20120703163530.GA2439@elstar.local> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "mib-doctors@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Errata against RFC 1628 X-BeenThere: mib-doctors@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: MIB Doctors list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 19:28:50 -0000 Thanks much. I will verify this errata and another that reports the out-of-= range value. Ron > -----Original Message----- > From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs- > university.de] > Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 12:36 PM > To: Ronald Bonica > Cc: mib-doctors@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Errata against RFC 1628 >=20 > On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 11:03:28AM -0400, Ronald Bonica wrote: > > Folks, > > > > Could someone please comment on the errata (below) against RFC 1628? > Am I correct in assuming that the text in the RFC won't compile at all? > > >=20 > Yep. There are also invalid range restrictions: >=20 > Index: src/libsmi/mibs/ietf/UPS-MIB > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > --- src/libsmi/mibs/ietf/UPS-MIB (revision 706) > +++ src/libsmi/mibs/ietf/UPS-MIB (working copy) > @@ -1013,7 +1013,7 @@ > ::=3D { upsControl 1 } >=20 > upsShutdownAfterDelay OBJECT-TYPE > - SYNTAX INTEGER (-1..2147483648) > + SYNTAX INTEGER (-1..2147483647) > UNITS "seconds" > MAX-ACCESS read-write > STATUS current > @@ -1041,7 +1041,7 @@ > ::=3D { upsControl 2 } >=20 > upsStartupAfterDelay OBJECT-TYPE > - SYNTAX INTEGER (-1..2147483648) > + SYNTAX INTEGER (-1..2147483647) > UNITS "seconds" > MAX-ACCESS read-write > STATUS current >=20 > No, I am too lazy to file erratas at the moment... >=20 > /js >=20 > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 From randy_presuhn@mindspring.com Tue Jul 3 12:32:12 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0565C11E81D7 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:32:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.07 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.07 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.530, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z4SveRZ0rhQx for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:32:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1BBF11E81BE for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:32:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=aWIir80WBm4bcEZCwA0NUjyiAMxtgOjXul7Isw8ar3phEoYR4ue0Geb5QgBIg2Jr; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [99.38.144.250] (helo=oemcomputer) by elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Sm8pd-0005nR-B5 for mib-doctors@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 15:32:17 -0400 Message-ID: <004901cd5953$22928e00$6b01a8c0@oemcomputer> From: "Randy Presuhn" To: References: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76F688B4B@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:36:24 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 X-ELNK-Trace: 4488c18417c9426da92b9037bc8bcf44d4c20f6b8d69d888b7f3a87d4e9c50f1e4634f2f00b1e3059405c1c900eb99ad350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 99.38.144.250 Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Errata against RFC 1628 X-BeenThere: mib-doctors@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: MIB Doctors list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 19:32:12 -0000 Hi - Yes, the omission of TEXTUAL-CONVENTION from the IMPORTS is an error. I don't know what the current implementation consensus is, but historically, some MIB compilers did not check to see whether TEXTUAL-CONVENTION was imported, and some responded to it with only a warning rather than an error message. Given RFC 1628's age, it's not particularly surprising that it doesn't quite align with RFC 2578 :-). Randy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ronald Bonica" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 8:03 AM Subject: [MIB-DOCTORS] Errata against RFC 1628 Folks, Could someone please comment on the errata (below) against RFC 1628? Am I correct in assuming that the text in the RFC won't compile at all? -------------------------- Ron Bonica vcard: www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf Errata ID: 3275 Status: Reported Type: Technical Reported By: Jürgen Sellinath Date Reported: 2012-07-03 Section 4 says: UPS-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN IMPORTS MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, NOTIFICATION-TYPE, OBJECT-IDENTITY, Counter32, Gauge32, Integer32 FROM SNMPv2-SMI DisplayString, TimeStamp, TimeInterval, TestAndIncr, AutonomousType FROM SNMPv2-TC MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP FROM SNMPv2-CONF; It should say: UPS-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN IMPORTS MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, NOTIFICATION-TYPE, OBJECT-IDENTITY, Counter32, Gauge32, Integer32 FROM SNMPv2-SMI DisplayString, TimeStamp, TimeInterval, TestAndIncr, AutonomousType, TEXTUAL-CONVENTION FROM SNMPv2-TC MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP FROM SNMPv2-CONF; Notes: Textual conventions are used within this MIB, but the macro "TEXTUAL-CONVENTION" itself is not imported, as it should (RFC 2578 §3.2). _______________________________________________ MIB-DOCTORS mailing list MIB-DOCTORS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors From bclaise@cisco.com Mon Jul 9 02:56:31 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E01521F8699 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 02:56:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.144 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.144 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.455, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uQc0NYK0C7ZE for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 02:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A90521F8602 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 02:56:30 -0700 (PDT) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q699lZgo005535; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 11:47:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.60.67.85] (ams-bclaise-8914.cisco.com [10.60.67.85]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q699lYCU003539; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 11:47:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FFAA8B6.3080709@cisco.com> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 11:47:34 +0200 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Nadeau References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "MIB Doctors \(E-mail\)" , Ron Bonica , "Joel M. Halpern" , Terry Manderson Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-mib-04.txt X-BeenThere: mib-doctors@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: MIB Doctors list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 09:56:31 -0000 Hi Tom, > > On 6/27/12 8:13 AM, "Juergen Schoenwaelder" > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 01:18:46PM +0200, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote: >>> Hallo, >>> >>> I did a very quick scan to see how much work it would and may know next >>> week >>> more if I would have the time. >>> >>> >>> What I noticed was the imports. >>> >>> >>> In section 8.1 is only one of the imports mentioned, looks odd although >>> the other imports >>> are the standard SNMP framework (SMI, etc..). >>> >>> >>> But the document reference for the import >>> (IANA-ADDRESS-FAMILY-NUMBERS-MIB) is >>> placed in the informative references and should go in the normative >>> references. >>> >> I think the most important thing to tell people is that their MIB >> module(s) must compile and that they should read RFC 4181 and check in >> particular the appendices. Perhaps we should simply return all MIB >> modules right away if they do not even compile. The LISP-MIB module >> has some rather serious syntax errors. > I've suggested a few times that it be done as part of id-nits, or as a > second pass if a MIB is detected. That would be nice. Any practical ideas how to do that? Regards, Benoit. > > --Tom > >> /js >> >> -- >> Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH >> Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany >> Fax: +49 421 200 3103 >> _______________________________________________ >> MIB-DOCTORS mailing list >> MIB-DOCTORS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors > _______________________________________________ > MIB-DOCTORS mailing list > MIB-DOCTORS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors > > From tnadeau@juniper.net Mon Jul 9 04:24:44 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B40821F85DF for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 04:24:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.018 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.581, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jCAZQWwxZSGH for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 04:24:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exprod7og122.obsmtp.com (exprod7og122.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E5B21F85E3 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 04:24:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob122.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT/q/ejlA9h5R0OVy5ShbDr7PvHEENHwO@postini.com; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 04:25:08 PDT Received: from p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.24) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 04:24:25 -0700 Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::d0d1:653d:5b91:a123%11]) with mapi; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 07:24:24 -0400 From: Thomas Nadeau To: Benoit Claise Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 07:24:23 -0400 Thread-Topic: [MIB-DOCTORS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-mib-04.txt Thread-Index: Ac1dxWRTNa2cpinuQrqdq2Xv/dkCUA== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4FFAA8B6.3080709@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.0.120402 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "MIB Doctors \(E-mail\)" , Ronald Bonica , "Joel M. Halpern" , Terry Manderson Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-mib-04.txt X-BeenThere: mib-doctors@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: MIB Doctors list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 11:24:44 -0000 On 7/9/12 3:47 AM, "Benoit Claise" wrote: >Hi Tom, >> >> On 6/27/12 8:13 AM, "Juergen Schoenwaelder" >> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 01:18:46PM +0200, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote: >>>> Hallo, >>>> >>>> I did a very quick scan to see how much work it would and may know >>>>next >>>> week >>>> more if I would have the time. >>>> >>>> >>>> What I noticed was the imports. >>>> >>>> >>>> In section 8.1 is only one of the imports mentioned, looks odd >>>>although >>>> the other imports >>>> are the standard SNMP framework (SMI, etc..). >>>> >>>> >>>> But the document reference for the import >>>> (IANA-ADDRESS-FAMILY-NUMBERS-MIB) is >>>> placed in the informative references and should go in the normative >>>> references. >>>> >>> I think the most important thing to tell people is that their MIB >>> module(s) must compile and that they should read RFC 4181 and check in >>> particular the appendices. Perhaps we should simply return all MIB >>> modules right away if they do not even compile. The LISP-MIB module >>> has some rather serious syntax errors. >> I've suggested a few times that it be done as part of id-nits, or as a >> second pass if a MIB is detected. >That would be nice. >Any practical ideas how to do that? A simple way to do this is to just add this to idnits. Add some logic that detects a MIB module and compiles it, and then issues a warning and/o sets a flag in the I-D's record that we can use for a variety of things. Perhaps the web-only version of I-d nits can do this due to licensing issues, but we should be able to do this when a draft is submitted. If it doesn't pass, we could allow it to be submitted, but flip a flag producing a warning message that alerts us and sets a status setting "compiles Y/N" in the I-d record. Chairs submitting drafts for IESG review would be required to have the set to "Y/Passes". MIB Doctor reviewers could also get a heads up as to the status of the document prior to reviewing. I don't think the above would be too complex and could be handled during one of the IETF code sprints. --Tom > >Regards, Benoit. >> >> --Tom >> >>> /js >>> >>> --=20 >>> Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH >>> Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany >>> Fax: +49 421 200 3103 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MIB-DOCTORS mailing list >>> MIB-DOCTORS@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors >> _______________________________________________ >> MIB-DOCTORS mailing list >> MIB-DOCTORS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors >> >> > > From bclaise@cisco.com Wed Jul 11 03:47:07 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC8121F867D for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 03:47:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.432 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.432 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.167, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4bYfoPQYalIr for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 03:47:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E59B21F8634 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 03:47:05 -0700 (PDT) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6BAYuuk005214; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:34:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.60.67.85] (ams-bclaise-8914.cisco.com [10.60.67.85]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6BAYtRB005525; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:34:55 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FFD56CF.6000302@cisco.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:34:55 +0200 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Nadeau References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "MIB Doctors \(E-mail\)" , Ronald Bonica , "Joel M. Halpern" , Terry Manderson Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-mib-04.txt X-BeenThere: mib-doctors@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: MIB Doctors list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:47:07 -0000 Tom, >>>> I think the most important thing to tell people is that their MIB >>>> module(s) must compile and that they should read RFC 4181 and check in >>>> particular the appendices. Perhaps we should simply return all MIB >>>> modules right away if they do not even compile. The LISP-MIB module >>>> has some rather serious syntax errors. >>> I've suggested a few times that it be done as part of id-nits, or as a >>> second pass if a MIB is detected. >> That would be nice. >> Any practical ideas how to do that? > A simple way to do this is to just add this to idnits. Add some logic > that detects a MIB module and compiles it, and then issues a warning and/o > sets a flag in the I-D's record that we can use for a variety of things. > Perhaps the web-only version of I-d nits can do this due to licensing > issues, but we should be able to do this when a draft is submitted. If it > doesn't pass, we could allow it to be submitted, but flip a flag producing > a warning message that alerts us and sets a status setting "compiles Y/N" > in the I-d record. Chairs submitting drafts for IESG review would be > required to have the set to "Y/Passes". MIB Doctor reviewers could also > get a heads up as to the status of the document prior to reviewing. > > I don't think the above would be too complex and could be handled during > one of the IETF code sprints. > > Let me follow up and see what can be done. Regards, Benoit. From bclaise@cisco.com Fri Jul 13 16:47:57 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE5E11E80EE; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:47:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.439 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.439 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.159, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pTJBDkjHFkok; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:47:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED65B11E80C0; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:47:55 -0700 (PDT) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6DNmWQK024250; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 01:48:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.60.67.85] (ams-bclaise-8914.cisco.com [10.60.67.85]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6DNmTxj020470; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 01:48:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5000B3CD.5000604@cisco.com> Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 01:48:29 +0200 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: aaa-doctors@ietf.org, "MIB Doctors (E-mail)" , YANG Doctors , "ops-dir@ietf.org" , IETF DNS Directorate References: <20120712224354.13043.7504.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20120712224354.13043.7504.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20120712224354.13043.7504.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090602040801030608060707" Subject: [MIB-DOCTORS] [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] Summarized Agenda for the 2012-07-19 IESG Teleconference X-BeenThere: mib-doctors@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: MIB Doctors list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 23:47:58 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090602040801030608060707 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear all, Please find below the agenda of the July 19th IESG telechat. Please send your questions, comments and concerns before July 18th COB. Thanks and Regards, Benoit. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] Summarized Agenda for the 2012-07-19 IESG Teleconference Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:43:54 -0700 From: IESG Secretary To: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG) Summarized Agenda for the 2012-07-19 IESG Teleconference This agenda was generated at 2012-07-12 15:42:12 PDT Up-to-date web version of this agenda can be found at: http://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/agenda/ 2. Protocol Actions 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Items o draft-sakane-dhc-dhcpv6-kdc-option-17 Kerberos Options for DHCPv6 (Proposed Standard) Note: The Document Shepherd for this document is Jeffrey Hutzelman, (jhutz@cmu.edu). Token: Stephen Farrell o draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements-08 Common requirements for Carrier Grade NATs (CGNs) (Best Current Practice) Note: Dan Wing (dwing@cisco.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Wesley Eddy o draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle-08 Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Bluetooth Low Energy (Proposed Standard) Note: Carsten Bormann (cabo@tzi.org) is the Document Shepherd. Token: Ralph Droms o draft-ietf-idr-rfc4893bis-07 BGP Support for Four-octet AS Number Space (Proposed Standard) Note: John Scudder (jgs@juniper.net) is the document shepherd. Token: Stewart Bryant o draft-ietf-abfab-gss-eap-08 A GSS-API Mechanism for the Extensible Authentication Protocol (Proposed Standard) Token: Stephen Farrell o draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-03 Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm Implementation Status (Best Current Practice) Note: Andrew Sullivan (ajs@anvilwalrusden.com) is the Document Shepherd Token: Ralph Droms o draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-update-03 DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm IANA Registry Updates (Proposed Standard) Note: Andrew Sullivan (ajs@anvilwalrusden.com) is the Document Shepherd Token: Ralph Droms o draft-ietf-appsawg-received-state-04 Indicating Email Handling States in Trace Fields (Proposed Standard) Token: Barry Leiba o draft-ietf-pkix-caa-10 DNS Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Resource Record (Proposed Standard) Note: Steve Kent (kent@bbn.com) is the Document Shepherd. Token: Sean Turner 2.1.2 Returning Items NONE 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Items o draft-sandlund-rfc4996bis-02 RObust Header Compression (ROHC): A Profile for TCP/IP (ROHC-TCP) (Proposed Standard) Token: Wesley Eddy o draft-camarillo-rai-media-policy-dataset-02 A User Agent Profile Data Set for Media Policy (Proposed Standard) Note: Mary Barnes is the document shepherd Token: Robert Sparks o draft-farrell-decade-ni-09 Naming Things with Hashes (Proposed Standard) Note: Alexey Melnikov (Alexey.Melnikov@isode.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Barry Leiba 2.2.2 Returning Items NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions 3.1.1 New Items o draft-ietf-karp-threats-reqs-05 Keying and Authentication for Routing Protocols (KARP) Overview, Threats, and Requirements (Informational) Note: Brian Weis (bew@cisco.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Stewart Bryant o draft-ietf-cdni-use-cases-09 Use Cases for Content Delivery Network Interconnection (Informational) Note: Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch@cisco.com) is the Document Shepherd. Token: Martin Stiemerling o draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-value-added-octets-04 Ericsson TWAMP Value-Added Octets (Informational) Note: Henk Uijterwaal (henk@uijterwaal.nl) is the document shepherd. Token: Wesley Eddy o draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-05 An IETF URN Sub-Namespace for OAuth (Informational) Note: Derek Atkins (derek@ihtfp.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Stephen Farrell 3.1.2 Returning Items NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD 3.2.1 New Items o draft-claise-export-application-info-in-ipfix-09 Cisco Systems Export of Application Information in IPFIX (Informational) Note: Individual Submission, AD-sponsored, Nevil Brownlee is the document shepherd, Token: Ronald Bonica o draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-tunneling-03 Tunneling of SMTP Message Transfer Priorities (Experimental) Token: Pete Resnick o draft-krishnan-nomcom-tools-01 Requirements for IETF Nominations Committee tools (Informational) Token: Russ Housley 3.2.2 Returning Items NONE 3.3 IRTF and Independent Submission Stream Documents 3.3.1 New Items NONE 3.3.2 Returning Items NONE 3.3.3 For Action o draft-mme-trill-fcoe-02 FCoE over TRILL (Informational) Note: ISE submission Token: Ralph Droms 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review NONE 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under Evaluation for IETF Review NONE 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval NONE --------------090602040801030608060707 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear all,

Please find below the agenda of the July 19th  IESG telechat.

Please send your questions, comments and concerns before July 18th COB.

Thanks and Regards, Benoit.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] Summarized Agenda for the 2012-07-19 IESG Teleconference
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:43:54 -0700
From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org 


INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG)
Summarized Agenda for the 2012-07-19 IESG Teleconference

This agenda was generated at 2012-07-12 15:42:12 PDT
Up-to-date web version of this agenda can be found at:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/agenda/
                                                                                


2. Protocol Actions
2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Items

  o draft-sakane-dhc-dhcpv6-kdc-option-17
    Kerberos Options for DHCPv6 (Proposed Standard)
    Note: The Document Shepherd for this document is Jeffrey Hutzelman,
    (jhutz@cmu.edu).
    Token: Stephen Farrell

  o draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements-08
    Common requirements for Carrier Grade NATs (CGNs) (Best Current
    Practice)
    Note: Dan Wing (dwing@cisco.com) is the document shepherd.
    Token: Wesley Eddy

  o draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle-08
    Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Bluetooth Low Energy (Proposed
    Standard)
    Note: Carsten Bormann (cabo@tzi.org) is the Document Shepherd. 
    Token: Ralph Droms

  o draft-ietf-idr-rfc4893bis-07
    BGP Support for Four-octet AS Number Space (Proposed Standard)
    Note: John Scudder (jgs@juniper.net) is the document shepherd.
    Token: Stewart Bryant

  o draft-ietf-abfab-gss-eap-08
    A GSS-API Mechanism for the Extensible Authentication Protocol
    (Proposed Standard)
    Token: Stephen Farrell

  o draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-03
    Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm
    Implementation Status (Best Current Practice)
    Note: Andrew Sullivan (ajs@anvilwalrusden.com) is the Document
    Shepherd
    Token: Ralph Droms

  o draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-update-03
    DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm IANA Registry Updates
    (Proposed Standard)
    Note: Andrew Sullivan (ajs@anvilwalrusden.com) is the Document
    Shepherd
    Token: Ralph Droms

  o draft-ietf-appsawg-received-state-04
    Indicating Email Handling States in Trace Fields (Proposed Standard)
    Token: Barry Leiba

  o draft-ietf-pkix-caa-10
    DNS Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Resource Record
    (Proposed Standard)
    Note: Steve Kent (kent@bbn.com) is the Document Shepherd.
    Token: Sean Turner

2.1.2 Returning Items

  NONE

2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Items

  o draft-sandlund-rfc4996bis-02
    RObust Header Compression (ROHC): A Profile for TCP/IP (ROHC-TCP)
    (Proposed Standard)
    Token: Wesley Eddy

  o draft-camarillo-rai-media-policy-dataset-02
    A User Agent Profile Data Set for Media Policy (Proposed Standard)
    Note: Mary Barnes is the document shepherd
    Token: Robert Sparks

  o draft-farrell-decade-ni-09
    Naming Things with Hashes (Proposed Standard)
    Note: Alexey Melnikov (Alexey.Melnikov@isode.com) is the document
    shepherd.
    Token: Barry Leiba

2.2.2 Returning Items

  NONE

3. Document Actions
3.1 WG Submissions
3.1.1 New Items

  o draft-ietf-karp-threats-reqs-05
    Keying and Authentication for Routing Protocols (KARP) Overview,
    Threats, and Requirements (Informational)
    Note: Brian Weis (bew@cisco.com) is the document shepherd.
    Token: Stewart Bryant

  o draft-ietf-cdni-use-cases-09
    Use Cases for Content Delivery Network Interconnection
    (Informational)
    Note:  Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch@cisco.com) is the Document
    Shepherd.
    Token: Martin Stiemerling

  o draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-value-added-octets-04
    Ericsson TWAMP Value-Added Octets (Informational)
    Note: Henk Uijterwaal (henk@uijterwaal.nl) is the document shepherd.
    Token: Wesley Eddy

  o draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-05
    An IETF URN Sub-Namespace for OAuth (Informational)
    Note: Derek Atkins (derek@ihtfp.com) is the document shepherd.
    Token: Stephen Farrell

3.1.2 Returning Items

  NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
3.2.1 New Items

  o draft-claise-export-application-info-in-ipfix-09
    Cisco Systems Export of Application Information in IPFIX
    (Informational)
    Note: Individual Submission, AD-sponsored, Nevil Brownlee is the
    document shepherd, 
    Token: Ronald Bonica

  o draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-tunneling-03
    Tunneling of SMTP Message Transfer Priorities (Experimental)
    Token: Pete Resnick

  o draft-krishnan-nomcom-tools-01
    Requirements for IETF Nominations Committee tools (Informational)
    Token: Russ Housley

3.2.2 Returning Items

  NONE

3.3 IRTF and Independent Submission Stream Documents
3.3.1 New Items

  NONE

3.3.2 Returning Items

  NONE

3.3.3 For Action

  o draft-mme-trill-fcoe-02
    FCoE over TRILL (Informational)
    Note: ISE submission
    Token: Ralph Droms

4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review

  NONE

4.1.2 Proposed for Approval

  NONE

4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under Evaluation for IETF Review

  NONE

4.2.2 Proposed for Approval

  NONE
--------------090602040801030608060707--