Subject: Re: [midcom] R79/R80 - current status

From: Scott Brim <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:13:21 -0400

Please do NOT reply to my previous message - I accidentally stuck in a
reply-to header line, and a number of people are going to be confused if
you actually do reply.

If you are going to reply, reply to this one instead.

..Scott (who plays with mail agents too much)

Melinda Shore schrieb am Thu, Aug 30, 2001 12:36:33PM -0400:
> As things currently stand, there's consensus to delete R79.

And there will be some non-fatal response to an attempt to install a
duplicate ruleset.  Could someone please provide the replacement
requirement saying so?

> There's a proposal to replace the text in R80 with the following:
> 
> "It must be possible to deterministically predict the
> behavior the firewall in the presence of overlapping rules."
> 
> Right now there's no specific dissent (several people agree
> that R80 should be deleted but haven't addressed replacement
> text), so if you object please speak up.

OK with me.

..Scott

_______________________________________________
midcom mailing list
[email-masked]
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom