Subject: [midcom] no state in agent?

From: Scott Brim <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 22:31:20 +0100

Christian, on Friday you said you thought the agent should retain no
state, and that if the middlebox had issues it should communicate
directly with the end node which the agent was representing when it made
its request to the middlebox.  This is an architectural issue, and not
one that we should put off.  If you want us to discuss this, could you
submit a requirement sentence for consideration?

..Scott

_______________________________________________
midcom mailing list
[email-masked]
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom