Subject: RE: [midcom] Status

From: "Sanjoy Sen" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 13:42:08 -0500

Why is R43 deleted? I think its a very useful requirement to be able to
group multiple commands within a single transaction for efficiency reasons.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Melinda Shore [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 12:01 PM
> To: midcom
> Subject: [midcom] Status
> 
> 
> R86 Accepted with revisions:
>   R86: It should possible to define rulesets that contain a 
> more specific
>   filter spec than an overlapping ruleset. This should allow agents to
>   request actions for the subset that contradict those of the 
> overlapping
>   set. This should allow Midcom agent to request to a Midcom server
>   controlling a firewall function that a subset of the 
> traffic that would
>   be allowed by the overlapping ruleset be specifically disallowed.
> 
> R35 Delete
> R38 Delete
> R43 Delete
> R47 Delete
> R75 Needs more discussion
> R?? Accepted:
>   "The midcom protocol must provide protection against replay
>   attacks"
> 
> Melinda
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> midcom mailing list
> [email-masked]
> http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom
>