Subject: [midcom] Semantics #5: Split PER transaction

From: Martin Stiemerling <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 01:11:34 +0100

Currently the state transitions in the policy rule state machine from
- PRID UNUSED to ENABLED
- RESERVED to ENABLED
'using' the same PER transaction.
If you take a look into the semantics draft you will recognize that the 
PER for the RESERVED to ENABLED transition doesn't need all the 
parameters as the PER for UNUSED to ENABLED does need.
So it would make sense to separate them both into two different 
transactions:
PER1 for RESERVED to ENABLED
PER2 for PRID UNUSED to ENABLED
(The names PER1 and PER2 are just for the first clarification!)

This would significantly simplify the semantics for the PER transaction.

_______________________________________________
midcom mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom