Subject: [midcom] Semantics #8: Other open issues

From: Martin Stiemerling <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 01:18:27 +0100

Here is a list of minor issues:
- Separate IP protocol version and transport protocol type in PRR/PER 
transaction? Currently these are defined: IP4/IP6/UDP4/UDP6/TCP4/TCP6

- Need to support ICMP, IGMP, RSVP,... as protocol types?

- Encryption method in SE transaction. Should SE failure reply convey 
supported encryption methods? Curently a 'don't understand your 
encryption' is returned.

- The security considerations need some further elaboration

- Any other issues???

_______________________________________________
midcom mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom