Subject: RE: [midcom] Consultation

From: "Tom-PT Taylor" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 08:51:02 -0500

The current candidate protocol, subject to rejection if it is actually found
to be unsuitable, is SNMPv3.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ford [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 7:55 AM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [midcom] Consultation
> Importance: High
> 
> 
> Dear All:
> ?? According to the milestone for MIDCOM, at the end of this year,
> 
> ?????DEC 02????Submission of an existing protocol for use as 
> midcom protocol? ? ????Would anyone tell me how about this 
> progress on the foregoing ?aspect? ????Thanks in advance!! 
> ????Best regards! ????????????????????????????? Yours: Ford Cheng
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> midcom mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom
> 
_______________________________________________
midcom mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom

---

From: ford <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 18:06:22 +0530

Then when will the guideline for SNMPV3 as MIDCOM be put forwarded?
 Thanks a lot!
 Best regards!
                                            Yours: Ford Cheng

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]]On Behalf Of
Tom-PT Taylor
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 7:21 PM
To: 'ford'; [email-masked]
Subject: RE: [midcom] Consultation