From nobody Sun Feb 21 07:53:23 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mif@ietf.org Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4781B2B9A; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 03:59:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "\"IETF Meeting Session Request Tool\"" To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.14.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160219115921.28218.35069.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 03:59:21 -0800 Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 07:53:19 -0800 Cc: mif@ietf.org, denghui02@hotmail.com, mif-chairs@ietf.org Subject: [mif] mif - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 95 X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:59:21 -0000 A new meeting session request has just been submitted by DENG Hui, a Chair of the mif working group. --------------------------------------------------------- Working Group Name: Multiple Interfaces Area Name: Internet Area Session Requester: DENG Hui Number of Sessions: 1 Length of Session(s): 2 Hours Number of Attendees: 60 Conflicts to Avoid: First Priority: 6man dhc dmm dnsop dnssd homenet intarea mptcp netext opsarea opsawg pcp softwire v6ops Second Priority: lwig sunset4 Special Requests: --------------------------------------------------------- From nobody Sun Feb 21 22:53:20 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mif@ietf.org Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D491B35E2; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:53:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.14.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160222065318.5815.66615.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:53:18 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: mif@ietf.org Subject: [mif] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mif-happy-eyeballs-extension-09.txt X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 06:53:19 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Multiple Interfaces of the IETF. Title : Happy Eyeballs Extension for Multiple Interfaces Authors : Gang Chen Carl Williams Dan Wing Andrew Yourtchenko Filename : draft-ietf-mif-happy-eyeballs-extension-09.txt Pages : 11 Date : 2016-02-21 Abstract: This memo proposes extensions to the Happy Eyeball(HE) defined in RFC6555 and fit into a multiple provisioning domain architecture. Happy Eyeballs in MIF would make the selection process smoother by using connectivity tests over pre-filtered interfaces according to defined policy. This would choose the most fast interface with an automatic fallback mechnism. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mif-happy-eyeballs-extension/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mif-happy-eyeballs-extension-09 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mif-happy-eyeballs-extension-09 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Sun Feb 21 22:55:29 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29591B35EB for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:55:28 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G5CWUpdjEy4I for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:55:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ig0-x236.google.com (mail-ig0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67CB31B35FA for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:55:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ig0-x236.google.com with SMTP id y8so80004553igp.0 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:55:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=ebEyVeREnVohCzaXLTEpIJlEmjvmHD3cyKahAzSHVqY=; b=kH3k/awxdKhLmje6u4jyvdLYZqIt9Cscpqj5DhFkACYj6gidXt+SBolZyGK+uGDT1P tWp+mte/7jz2CPu/PtERcvAI8lKFqItjwuGpHIggo3cMadP3U6wkKu9/Xi69XcHRNgH+ VmL8KiDo4TEmNvG3a4/oOZ8b++6BlyFN3iy7w9uzVshoWRoPwaRVZvv80CZHfxKLAtTX lGwbNXqoo4YEp3hP8roogteLtTEItLUQzNhQLYUXX+Q6W3zSlL91cSdc1/YV/z1ko3sa p0wugc+0IPPk1K3GDj//h9VbMZhNJ/8OrVWJLJQcFX1r+uSXAg9vAV3SM1XtJp67YIUz uz/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=ebEyVeREnVohCzaXLTEpIJlEmjvmHD3cyKahAzSHVqY=; b=Q6dzaTZjAIgTsS6KbPxsvBz5hqpf0wgCjzSua006ozEhcoZUP4A92ZV2VESmhJ31wq GONB4tNZ/diAnbhEMatbJGzRx+Rz6uKQnCCcakYX2uZreiFubgP+B1UVnrdR0GOuD4Zj 8DU+YXjw+/wGGAPK/NfHSKjlhNHZcEmgXs+E7Iey+ghRg86HJw5fRQHPLZMCuNyP9nol xRCshbyV0LMls4QrKEoCFjgDIUTlKTorAOsLgk9rxTneVhmNX3zL838mh1U9jazEMbFH HC71yDzZ41snQyke8dkjeug3WPuhqLPxlPHT+RH3Tf+dlgOVbLOfYI601S1p8h8qIeHY 4aTg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSrW76TTfO0XPpqgz7ijUR2o28QRkX2pMWeyiJNXWlv3O9p3Az4JTNVgFED+Z0VC8y7oMAqjJrgFkMANQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.28.20 with SMTP id x20mr9863148igg.87.1456124124884; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:55:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.149.215 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:55:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20160222065318.5815.66615.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> References: <20160222065318.5815.66615.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:55:24 +0800 Message-ID: From: GangChen To: mif Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [mif] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mif-happy-eyeballs-extension-09.txt X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 06:55:28 -0000 Wg, We submit this update to fix some nits going through the IDNits tool check. Many thanks BRs Gang 2016-02-22 14:53 GMT+08:00, internet-drafts@ietf.org : > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Multiple Interfaces of the IETF. > > Title : Happy Eyeballs Extension for Multiple Interfaces > Authors : Gang Chen > Carl Williams > Dan Wing > Andrew Yourtchenko > Filename : draft-ietf-mif-happy-eyeballs-extension-09.txt > Pages : 11 > Date : 2016-02-21 > > Abstract: > This memo proposes extensions to the Happy Eyeball(HE) defined in > RFC6555 and fit into a multiple provisioning domain architecture. > Happy Eyeballs in MIF would make the selection process smoother by > using connectivity tests over pre-filtered interfaces according to > defined policy. This would choose the most fast interface with an > automatic fallback mechnism. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mif-happy-eyeballs-extension/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mif-happy-eyeballs-extension-09 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mif-happy-eyeballs-extension-09 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > mif mailing list > mif@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif > From nobody Thu Feb 25 22:04:47 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mif@ietf.org Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E931A9147; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 22:04:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.14.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160226060446.28114.15678.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 22:04:46 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: mif@ietf.org Subject: [mif] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-ndp-support-03.txt X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 06:04:46 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Multiple Interfaces of the IETF. Title : Support for multiple provisioning domains in IPv6 Neighbor Discovery Protocol Authors : Jouni Korhonen Suresh Krishnan Sri Gundavelli Filename : draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-ndp-support-03.txt Pages : 10 Date : 2016-02-25 Abstract: The MIF working group is producing a solution to solve the issues that are associated with nodes that can be attached to multiple networks. One part of the solution requires associating configuration information with provisioning domains. This document details how configuration information provided through IPv6 Neighbor Discovery Protocol can be associated with provisioning domains. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-ndp-support/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-ndp-support-03 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-ndp-support-03 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Mon Feb 29 02:21:31 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA781B2F88 for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:21:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.345 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.345 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YUkV1Z87jCyg for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:21:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from COL004-OMC2S7.hotmail.com (col004-omc2s7.hotmail.com [65.55.34.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E41E1B2F87 for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:21:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from COL125-W39 ([65.55.34.72]) by COL004-OMC2S7.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:21:25 -0800 X-TMN: [h+g1bTMfIuKiO9V1GaNjI0IFD7pgr7Itgcx+uBGRWek=] X-Originating-Email: [denghui02@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_0ff35994-9a42-48de-a748-ad3e382c9207_" From: Hui Deng To: "mif@ietf.org" , Margaret Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:21:24 +0800 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Feb 2016 10:21:25.0239 (UTC) FILETIME=[F19B7870:01D172DA] Archived-At: Subject: [mif] next step for MIF PVD configuration X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:21:30 -0000 --_0ff35994-9a42-48de-a748-ad3e382c9207_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGVsbG8gYWxsDQpXZSBoYWQgdGhlIGNvbmNlbnN1cyBhbHJlYWR5IGFib3V0IGRyb3BpbmcgREhD UCBNUFZEIElEIGRvY3VtZW50LCBiYXNlZCBvbiB0aGlzLCBoZXJlIGNoYWlycyB3b3VsZCBsaWtl IHRvIHVuZGVyc3RhbmQgd2hldGhlciBNSUYgV0doYXMgYWNoaWV2ZWQgdGhlIGNvbmNlbnN1cyBv biBiZWxvdyB0d28gc3RlcHMgdG8gZGVsaXZlciBNUFZEIGNvbmYuMSkgc3RlcCAxOiB1c2luZyBS QSB0byBnZXQgTVBWRCBJRCBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbjIpIHN0ZXAgMjogdXNpbmcgRE5TIHRvIGdldCBv dGhlciBNUFZEIGNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24uDQpUaGFua3MgZm9yIHlvdXIgZmVlZGJhY2sNCi1DYy1j aGFpcnMgCQkgCSAgIAkJICA= --_0ff35994-9a42-48de-a748-ad3e382c9207_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWw+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxzdHlsZT48IS0tDQouaG1tZXNzYWdlIFANCnsNCm1hcmdpbjowcHg7 DQpwYWRkaW5nOjBweA0KfQ0KYm9keS5obW1lc3NhZ2UNCnsNCmZvbnQtc2l6ZTogMTJwdDsNCmZv bnQtZmFtaWx5OkNhbGlicmkNCn0NCi0tPjwvc3R5bGU+PC9oZWFkPg0KPGJvZHkgY2xhc3M9J2ht bWVzc2FnZSc+PGRpdiBkaXI9J2x0cic+PGRpdj5IZWxsbyBhbGw8L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pjxicj48L2Rp dj48ZGl2PldlIGhhZCB0aGUgY29uY2Vuc3VzIGFscmVhZHkgYWJvdXQgZHJvcGluZyBESENQIE1Q VkQgSUQgZG9jdW1lbnQsJm5ic3A7PC9kaXY+PGRpdj5iYXNlZCBvbiB0aGlzLCBoZXJlIGNoYWly cyB3b3VsZCBsaWtlIHRvIHVuZGVyc3RhbmQgd2hldGhlciBNSUYgV0c8L2Rpdj48ZGl2PmhhcyBh Y2hpZXZlZCB0aGUgY29uY2Vuc3VzIG9uIGJlbG93IHR3byBzdGVwcyB0byBkZWxpdmVyIE1QVkQg Y29uZi48L2Rpdj48ZGl2PjEpIHN0ZXAgMTogdXNpbmcgUkEgdG8gZ2V0IE1QVkQgSUQgaW5mb3Jt YXRpb248L2Rpdj48ZGl2PjIpIHN0ZXAgMjogdXNpbmcgRE5TIHRvIGdldCBvdGhlciBNUFZEIGNv bmZpZ3VyYXRpb24uPC9kaXY+PGRpdj48YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj5UaGFua3MgZm9yIHlvdXIgZmVl ZGJhY2s8L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pi1DYy1jaGFpcnM8L2Rpdj4gCQkgCSAgIAkJ ICA8L2Rpdj48L2JvZHk+DQo8L2h0bWw+ --_0ff35994-9a42-48de-a748-ad3e382c9207_-- From nobody Mon Feb 29 05:26:44 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1AE01A89A2 for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 05:26:43 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.605 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yKhCy0f5Lg1d for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 05:26:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.zemris.fer.hr (gandalf.zemris.fer.hr [161.53.65.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0191A89A0 for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 05:26:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.zemris.fer.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CD53B7C096; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 14:26:38 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zemris.fer.hr Received: from mail.zemris.fer.hr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.zemris.fer.hr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OhRH11OMfoDy; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 14:26:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from w540.sistemnet.local (Enel.zemris.fer.hr [161.53.65.34]) by mail.zemris.fer.hr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB0553B7C077; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 14:26:34 +0100 (CET) To: mif@ietf.org References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Stjepan_Gro=c5=a1?= Organization: UNIZG - FER Message-ID: <56D44703.7050700@fer.hr> Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 14:26:27 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rcx4xPDqN7734eBEjUCAbaV96mSmCSJaI" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [mif] next step for MIF PVD configuration X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 13:26:44 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --rcx4xPDqN7734eBEjUCAbaV96mSmCSJaI Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020001000001090803000501" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020001000001090803000501 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all! On 29.02.2016 11:21, Hui Deng wrote: > Hello all > > We had the concensus already about droping DHCP MPVD ID document,=20 > based on this, here chairs would like to understand whether MIF WG > has achieved the concensus on below two steps to deliver MPVD conf. > 1) step 1: using RA to get MPVD ID information > 2) step 2: using DNS to get other MPVD configuration. Since I didn't saw any discussions on this list about those proposals I have few questions/comments: 1. Is this only for IPv6, or it is for IPv4 too (step 2)? 2. Why only MPVD ID in RA? Why not other information too for which RA is a natural place to be? 3. Why turn DNS into a local network configuration protocol? SG --------------020001000001090803000501 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all!

On 29.02.2016 11:21, Hui Deng wrote:
Hello all

We had the concensus already about droping DHCP MPVD ID document,=A0
based on this, here chairs would like to understand whether MIF WG
has achieved the concensus on below two steps to deliver MPVD conf.
1) step 1: using RA to get MPVD ID information
2) step 2: using DNS to get other MPVD configuration.

Since I didn't saw any discussions on this list about those proposals I have few questions/comments:

1. Is this only for IPv6, or it is for IPv4 too (step 2)?

2. Why only MPVD ID in RA? Why not other information too for which RA is a natural place to be?

3. Why turn DNS into a local network configuration protocol?

SG

--------------020001000001090803000501-- --rcx4xPDqN7734eBEjUCAbaV96mSmCSJaI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJW1EcDAAoJEOggxEF22YTDAtMP/0TzxSwwAKtnVln8mbOPTakb 9lOoN7sHA77Z3H9+Y7uOQHPlS0ZA3KWEKJmGmk8v2gjlSvBBvIIAapF4qF03dGoH ggdRoNn/eMdXLqcfFLnzdNws3V0UIxPANyYyCvlXDlN47MW7QJawGEQCGQBn08Xf VgWDRCulcgn/ENptMFvFVJPbr9uvOxIYRTFoLeQ82vD83XjKxiXB9A66h+7N/k+K a/GW1RXzihMKlXkvmaSqk0a+d4JgpkSyiZxIYE71co37/oVrACQ9EmosCHnPJ0CE Hctcy5aTloY1b/cr4yJDngSqqjqgkae91koRsuc+gR1fDtQDhB/28CF5R0dWwDRE qtdjiHQa+NTcLySXHVivfm9x0qArmXSghG8X3TTzugy93OB7muODWSkBjcabNlDh MuD0hA+s0eO02RKNRgNBGLw6xjC3Cnniuz206PoOI2b0CWv3vkalt70IR7k7F+nG W/1pMlZV5Cj0ALZMUKH0JKJWD8hn/jR/x4c351teSO7+q8AJHG7HZ2sy6m3s/1SN n491Mu5Cz5LsPxs6BN9I8lMHMX/UplyDh2n5TGIayJxZhGLcR/Rr1pC/70CqFl7g 7y8UWV7DhCfz+fAWsHEr6UiNpbKGkcWWrlnR6mQcM/mb2f2I0N7z975yGhHJC95N yzSL03Tfki3HGjHBDJ1u =CE02 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rcx4xPDqN7734eBEjUCAbaV96mSmCSJaI--