From mccap@petoni.org Wed Apr 13 12:27:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mip4@ietfc.amsl.com Delivered-To: mip4@ietfc.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB21E06BC for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:27:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.977 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l9hnQaTeKA4k for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:27:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D90E06AC for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:27:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qwc23 with SMTP id 23so670932qwc.31 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:27:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.135.211 with SMTP id o19mr6737466qat.19.1302722852162; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:27:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.28.67 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:27:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [64.53.131.166] Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:27:32 -0500 Message-ID: From: Pete McCann To: mip4@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [Mip4] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-dynamic-04.txt X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:27:36 -0000 This message announces a WG last call on: "Dynamic Prefix Allocation for NEMOv4" draft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-dynamic-04.txt The base NEMOv4 specification defines extensions to Mobile IPv4 for mobile networks. This specification defines a dynamic prefix allocation mechanism. This draft is intended for publication as a Proposed Standard. The last call will conclude at 24:00 UTC on Wednesday, April 27, 2011. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: Please respond to this WG last call: * If you have no comments on the draft, and support its advancement, simply respond with a line containing something like "I support the advancement of this document to the IESG with a request for publication as proposed standard." If you have comments, please use a line similar to the one above, and supplement this with your comments. * If you *don't* support its advancement, respond with a line containing something like the following, supplemented by your comments - "I don't support the advancement of this document to the IESG with a request for publication as proposed standard, for the following reasons:" ... -Pete From mccap@petoni.org Wed Apr 13 15:14:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mip4@ietfc.amsl.com Delivered-To: mip4@ietfc.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E499EE06B6 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:14:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.977 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nLkLtyEIohfh for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FEF7E05F5 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qwc23 with SMTP id 23so758349qwc.31 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:14:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.95.18 with SMTP id b18mr8993qan.119.1302732875855; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:14:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.28.67 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:14:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [64.53.131.166] Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:14:35 -0500 Message-ID: From: Pete McCann To: mip4@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [Mip4] My affiliation X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:14:37 -0000 In the interest of full disclosure, I wanted to let everyone know that I have changed affiliations. I am now an employee of Futurwei, a division of Huawei. I will continue to use my mccap@petoni.org e-mail address for IETF-related mail for at least the next little while. -Pete From marc.brogle@sap.com Fri Apr 15 12:28:00 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mip4@ietfc.amsl.com Delivered-To: mip4@ietfc.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39FACE085E for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:28:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0v5TRfC65vVh for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:27:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpgw.sap-ag.de (smtpgw03.sap-ag.de [155.56.66.98]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53444E083C for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:27:55 -0700 (PDT) From: "Brogle, Marc" To: "mip4@ietf.org" Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:26:41 +0200 Thread-Topic: CfP for 5th ERCIM Workshop on eMobility: Extended submission deadline: April 26, 2011 Thread-Index: Acv7owxAmtfSuqWMTtSc7hawkRlO+g== Message-ID: <9E6AD8FC163E774B845C845A7CB951091FB8F5F951@DEWDFECCR04.wdf.sap.corp> Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US, de-DE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:54:29 -0700 Subject: [Mip4] CfP for 5th ERCIM Workshop on eMobility: Extended submission deadline: April 26, 2011 X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:28:00 -0000 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 5th ERCIM Workshop on eMobility June 14, 2011 - Vilanova i la Geltru, Catalonia, Spain in conjunction with WWIC 2011 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ****** SUBMISSION DEADLINE EXTENDED TO: February 26th, 2011 ****** ----------------------------------------------------------------------- CALL FOR PAPERS --------------- Progress in computing and (wireless) communication technologies allow mobile users to permanently communicate with other persons or to use services and applications that might even have been designed for mobile users. Mobile Applications and services require technical solutions on various levels such as wireless network technologies, communication architectures and protocols supporting mobility of users and devices, middleware to support security and flexibility, as well as applications that are adaptive and context sensitive, although or because mobile devices have usually limited resources. The target of the workshop is to discuss issues and problems related to future applications and services based on mobile and wireless technologies. This multi- disciplinary workshop aims to bring together researchers, who are active in these different research areas. Topics of interest include but are not limited to: - Future mobile applications, e.g. medical applications, multimedia, mobile learning, telematics - Mobile application support such as coding, content distribution and adaptation - Ubiquitous, pervasive, and context-aware computing & communications - Location-based services - Mobile Peer-to-Peer - Security including trust and authentication - Runtime adaptation - Software development for mobile devices - Wireless access networks - Mobile ad-hoc and wireless mesh networks - Sensor networks - Wireless experimentation and test networks - Simulation methods and tools for wireless wireless networks - Mobility management, roaming, and handover support - Quality-of-Service and traffic engineering - Transport protocols and congestion control in wireless networks - Cross-layer protocol design - Energy-efficient protocol mechanisms - Vehicular and car-to-car communication - Social networks for eMobility - Green mobile ICT Authors are encouraged to submit papers describing original, previously unpublished, results, not currently under review by another conference or journal, addressing original research. All papers will be reviewed and accepted papers will appear in the workshop proceedings (with ISBN number). Submitted papers should be formatted according to the Springer LNCS formatting standard, available at the Springer website. Technical contributions can be submitted as full, short, and abstract papers with 12, 6, or 1-2 pages respectively. SUBMISSION ---------- Paper submissions should be made electronically via the workshop's web page at EDAS: http://edas.info/N10677. CO-LOCATED EVENTS ----------------- The ERCIM eMobility Workshop on June 14, 2011, is co-located with the WWIC 2011 conference which will take place from June 15 to 17 in Vilanova i la Geltru, Catalonia, Spain. DATES ----- Paper submission (deadline extended): April 26, 2011 Author notification: May 10, 2011 Camera-ready and registration: May 17, 2011 REGISTRATION ------------ Since the eMobility workshop is colocated with the WWIC 2011 please use the general registration form for the conference. You will find the registration form and further information on the WWIC 2011 page. WORKSHOP PROGRAM ---------------- The workshop's program will available at the WWIC 2011 web site. WORKSHOP CHAIRS --------------- General Co-Chairs: Torsten Braun, University of Bern, CH Geert Heijenk, University of Twente, NL TPC Co-Chairs: Marc Brogle, SAP AG (SAP Research), CH Xavi Masip, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, ES WORKSHOP TPC ------------ Francisco Barcelo-Arroyo, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, ES Hans van den Berg, University of Twente, NL Robert Bestak, Czech Technical University in Prague, CZ Raffaele Bruno, Italian National Research Council, IT Tao Chen, VTT, FI Djamel Djenouri, CERIST research centre Algiers, Algeria Jean-Marie Jacquet, University of Namur, BE Dimitri Konstantas, University of Geneva, CH Yevgeni Koucheryavy, Tampere University of Technology, FI Saverio Mascolo, Politecnico di Bari, IT Edmundo Monteiro, University of Coimbra, PT Evgeny Osipov, LTU Lulea University of Technology, SE Vasilios Siris, ICS-FORTH / AUEB, GR Dirk St=E4hle, University of Wuerzburg, DE ERCIM EMOBILITY --------------- Scientists interested in joining the eMobility Working Group should contact the Working Group coordinator. Please contact: Torsten Braun eMobility WG coordinator University of Bern E-mail: braun@iam.unibe.ch ----------------------------------------------------------------------- From marc.brogle@sap.com Sun Apr 24 13:32:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mip4@ietfc.amsl.com Delivered-To: mip4@ietfc.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599C1E065A for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 13:32:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sl5Gw1pjPZDc for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 13:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpgw.sap-ag.de (smtpgw01.sap-ag.de [155.56.66.96]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC28E0655 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 13:32:08 -0700 (PDT) From: "Brogle, Marc" To: "mip4@ietf.org" Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 22:31:00 +0200 Thread-Topic: Only two days to deadline - 5th ERCIM Workshop on eMobility: Extended submission deadline: April 26, 2011 Thread-Index: AcwCvoXmpdN2XujMT8CXR94qv7fJ2Q== Message-ID: <9E6AD8FC163E774B845C845A7CB951091FB9186322@DEWDFECCR04.wdf.sap.corp> Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US, de-DE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 17:17:52 -0700 Subject: [Mip4] Only two days to deadline - 5th ERCIM Workshop on eMobility: Extended submission deadline: April 26, 2011 X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 20:32:10 -0000 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 5th ERCIM Workshop on eMobility June 14, 2011 - Vilanova i la Geltru, Catalonia, Spain in conjunction with WWIC 2011 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ****** SUBMISSION DEADLINE EXTENDED TO: April 26th, 2011 ****** ----------------------------------------------------------------------- CALL FOR PAPERS --------------- Progress in computing and (wireless) communication technologies allow mobile users to permanently communicate with other persons or to use services and applications that might even have been designed for mobile users. Mobile Applications and services require technical solutions on various levels such as wireless network technologies, communication architectures and protocols supporting mobility of users and devices, middleware to support security and flexibility, as well as applications that are adaptive and context sensitive, although or because mobile devices have usually limited resources. The target of the workshop is to discuss issues and problems related to future applications and services based on mobile and wireless technologies. This multi- disciplinary workshop aims to bring together researchers, who are active in these different research areas. Topics of interest include but are not limited to: - Future mobile applications, e.g. medical applications, multimedia, mobile learning, telematics - Mobile application support such as coding, content distribution and adaptation - Ubiquitous, pervasive, and context-aware computing & communications - Location-based services - Mobile Peer-to-Peer - Security including trust and authentication - Runtime adaptation - Software development for mobile devices - Wireless access networks - Mobile ad-hoc and wireless mesh networks - Sensor networks - Wireless experimentation and test networks - Simulation methods and tools for wireless wireless networks - Mobility management, roaming, and handover support - Quality-of-Service and traffic engineering - Transport protocols and congestion control in wireless networks - Cross-layer protocol design - Energy-efficient protocol mechanisms - Vehicular and car-to-car communication - Social networks for eMobility - Green mobile ICT Authors are encouraged to submit papers describing original, previously unpublished, results, not currently under review by another conference or journal, addressing original research. All papers will be reviewed and accepted papers will appear in the workshop proceedings (with ISBN number). Submitted papers should be formatted according to the Springer LNCS formatting standard, available at the Springer website. Technical contributions can be submitted as full, short, and abstract papers with 12, 6, or 1-2 pages respectively. SUBMISSION ---------- Paper submissions should be made electronically via the workshop's web page at EDAS: http://edas.info/N10677. CO-LOCATED EVENTS ----------------- The ERCIM eMobility Workshop on June 14, 2011, is co-located with the WWIC 2011 conference which will take place from June 15 to 17 in Vilanova i la Geltru, Catalonia, Spain. DATES ----- Paper submission (deadline extended): April 26, 2011 Author notification: May 10, 2011 Camera-ready and registration: May 17, 2011 REGISTRATION ------------ Since the eMobility workshop is colocated with the WWIC 2011 please use the general registration form for the conference. You will find the registration form and further information on the WWIC 2011 page. WORKSHOP PROGRAM ---------------- The workshop's program will available at the WWIC 2011 web site. WORKSHOP CHAIRS --------------- General Co-Chairs: Torsten Braun, University of Bern, CH Geert Heijenk, University of Twente, NL TPC Co-Chairs: Marc Brogle, SAP AG (SAP Research), CH Xavi Masip, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, ES WORKSHOP TPC ------------ Francisco Barcelo-Arroyo, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, ES Hans van den Berg, University of Twente, NL Robert Bestak, Czech Technical University in Prague, CZ Raffaele Bruno, Italian National Research Council, IT Tao Chen, VTT, FI Djamel Djenouri, CERIST research centre Algiers, Algeria Jean-Marie Jacquet, University of Namur, BE Dimitri Konstantas, University of Geneva, CH Yevgeni Koucheryavy, Tampere University of Technology, FI Saverio Mascolo, Politecnico di Bari, IT Edmundo Monteiro, University of Coimbra, PT Evgeny Osipov, LTU Lulea University of Technology, SE Vasilios Siris, ICS-FORTH / AUEB, GR Dirk St=E4hle, University of Wuerzburg, DE ERCIM EMOBILITY --------------- Scientists interested in joining the eMobility Working Group should contact the Working Group coordinator. Please contact: Torsten Braun eMobility WG coordinator University of Bern E-mail: braun@iam.unibe.ch ----------------------------------------------------------------------- From mccap@petoni.org Wed Apr 27 12:24:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mip4@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mip4@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80CACE0803 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:24:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.977 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8bOFaXrGGZF5 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:24:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2223EE0813 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:24:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so1576076fxm.31 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:24:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.60.81 with SMTP id o17mr181113fah.48.1303932246253; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:24:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.4.215 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:24:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [174.146.11.248] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:24:06 -0400 Message-ID: From: Pete McCann To: mip4@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Mip4] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-dynamic-04.txt X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 19:24:09 -0000 Hi, All, This WGLC is ending tonight. So far we have received no comments, but I think the draft is short and straightforward and we all understand it. I read it over this afternoon and the only comment I have is to change the term "mobile client" to "Mobile Router" to be consistent with the terms in 5177 (note the capitalization). -Pete On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Pete McCann wrote: > This message announces a WG last call on: > > "Dynamic Prefix Allocation for NEMOv4" > draft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-dynamic-04.txt > > The base NEMOv4 specification defines extensions to Mobile IPv4 for > mobile networks. =A0This specification defines a dynamic prefix > allocation mechanism. > > This draft is intended for publication as a Proposed Standard. > The last call will conclude at 24:00 UTC on Wednesday, April 27, 2011. > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > > > > > > > Please respond to this WG last call: > > > > * If you have no comments on the draft, and support its advancement, > =A0simply respond with a line containing something like > > "I support the advancement of this document to the IESG with a request > =A0for publication as proposed standard." > > If you have comments, please use a line similar to the one above, and > supplement this with your comments. > > > * If you *don't* support its advancement, respond with a line containing > =A0something like the following, supplemented by your comments - > > "I don't support the advancement of this document to the IESG with a > request for publication as proposed standard, for the following reasons:"= ... > > -Pete > From kleung@cisco.com Wed Apr 27 12:33:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mip4@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mip4@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92799E081D for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:33:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fFEXoUNOYdYE for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:33:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772B8E06ED for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:33:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=kleung@cisco.com; l=2340; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1303932787; x=1305142387; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to; bh=qMVofFtoDH4zqvXLozkxStVig16IyIQH/Co8ESwI5VQ=; b=kcqhWIww5U9l0J4de2cbgVTGzLjKNsX0Ly2k3YeRAxYOIF/vqW1Ev/tD 279Z/Txw14UK6kFRTEtdl4y6hMsjrWm39XWXM/3pEHgKAmgHpgAF8w6tC LcQfj9wsrSuvE0DgFV6VVu+7XEuZPvGokOkCsDJslW2k1UhXCT4OwGP81 g=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgsBALJuuE2rRDoH/2dsb2JhbACYA41td6dEnG6FdgSGA4xoijI X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,275,1301875200"; d="scan'208";a="303410810" Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Apr 2011 19:33:07 +0000 Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3RJX7Sf014902; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 19:33:07 GMT Received: from xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.85]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:33:07 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:33:04 -0700 Message-ID: <2979E38DD6FC6544B789C8DAD7BAFC520EBB6208@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [Mip4] Working Group Last Call ondraft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-dynamic-04.txt Thread-Index: AcwFELWTksE8oXEYQN23/uyEQjfKogAARyJg References: From: "Kent Leung (kleung)" To: "Pete McCann" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Apr 2011 19:33:07.0087 (UTC) FILETIME=[EF18E1F0:01CC0511] Subject: Re: [Mip4] Working Group Last Call ondraft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-dynamic-04.txt X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 19:33:08 -0000 Hi Pete. I agree and will make the suggested changes before publishing = the next version. Kent -----Original Message----- From: mip4-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mip4-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of = Pete McCann Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 12:24 PM To: mip4@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Mip4] Working Group Last Call = ondraft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-dynamic-04.txt Hi, All, This WGLC is ending tonight. So far we have received no comments, but I think the draft is short and straightforward and we all understand it. I read it over this afternoon and the only comment I have is to change the term "mobile client" to "Mobile Router" to be consistent with the terms in 5177 (note the capitalization). -Pete On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Pete McCann wrote: > This message announces a WG last call on: > > "Dynamic Prefix Allocation for NEMOv4" > draft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-dynamic-04.txt > > The base NEMOv4 specification defines extensions to Mobile IPv4 for > mobile networks. =A0This specification defines a dynamic prefix > allocation mechanism. > > This draft is intended for publication as a Proposed Standard. > The last call will conclude at 24:00 UTC on Wednesday, April 27, 2011. > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > > = > > > > > Please respond to this WG last call: > > > > * If you have no comments on the draft, and support its advancement, > =A0simply respond with a line containing something like > > "I support the advancement of this document to the IESG with a request > =A0for publication as proposed standard." > > If you have comments, please use a line similar to the one above, and > supplement this with your comments. > > > * If you *don't* support its advancement, respond with a line = containing > =A0something like the following, supplemented by your comments - > > "I don't support the advancement of this document to the IESG with a > request for publication as proposed standard, for the following = reasons:" ... > > -Pete > --=20 Mip4 mailing list: Mip4@ietf.org Web interface: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4 Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/ From alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com Thu Apr 28 08:08:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mip4@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mip4@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A250E06E4 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:08:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mMcEZIinvtMV for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:08:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cirse-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775A6E069F for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:08:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.2) with ESMTP id p3SF8eu8000630 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:08:40 +0200 Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3SF8d3f012771; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:08:39 +0200 (envelope-from alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com) Received: from [132.166.133.178] (is010173.intra.cea.fr [132.166.133.178]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.1) with ESMTP id p3SF8dZV020941; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:08:39 +0200 Message-ID: <4DB982F7.2040009@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:08:39 +0200 From: Alexandru Petrescu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mip4@ietf.org References: <2979E38DD6FC6544B789C8DAD7BAFC520EBB6208@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <2979E38DD6FC6544B789C8DAD7BAFC520EBB6208@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Mip4] Working Group Last Call ondraft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-dynamic-04.txt X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:08:43 -0000 Draft looks ok. Reference to Mobile IPv4 should be updated (rfc5944 obsoletes rfc3344). Are there prototype implementations about it? We could discuss new reply codes (i.e. MR requests a prefix allocation but HA refuses). "extensiona" is a, typo should be "extension" We could specify the MR such that when it receives such a prefix from its HA then it writes it in its local dhcpd.conf, or otherwise put, it uses that MNP for serving autoconfiguration purposes of the LFNs attaching to it. The goal proper of this draft is this. What happened to http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-johnson-dhc-subnet-alloc-00 ? If there exist a DHCP implementation doing this subnet allocation then it makes sense to document it for NEMO. Otherwise the behaviour in the draft seems ok. Alex Le 27/04/2011 21:33, Kent Leung (kleung) a écrit : > Hi Pete. I agree and will make the suggested changes before > publishing the next version. > > Kent > > -----Original Message----- From: mip4-bounces@ietf.org > [mailto:mip4-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pete McCann Sent: > Wednesday, April 27, 2011 12:24 PM To: mip4@ietf.org Subject: Re: > [Mip4] Working Group Last Call > ondraft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-dynamic-04.txt > > Hi, All, > > This WGLC is ending tonight. So far we have received no comments, > but I think the draft is short and straightforward and we all > understand it. > > I read it over this afternoon and the only comment I have is to > change the term "mobile client" to "Mobile Router" to be consistent > with the terms in 5177 (note the capitalization). > > -Pete > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Pete McCann > wrote: >> This message announces a WG last call on: >> >> "Dynamic Prefix Allocation for NEMOv4" >> draft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-dynamic-04.txt >> >> The base NEMOv4 specification defines extensions to Mobile IPv4 for >> mobile networks. This specification defines a dynamic prefix >> allocation mechanism. >> >> This draft is intended for publication as a Proposed Standard. The >> last call will conclude at 24:00 UTC on Wednesday, April 27, 2011. >> >> A URL for this Internet-Draft is: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Please >> respond to this WG last call: >> >> >> >> * If you have no comments on the draft, and support its >> advancement, simply respond with a line containing something like >> >> "I support the advancement of this document to the IESG with a >> request for publication as proposed standard." >> >> If you have comments, please use a line similar to the one above, >> and supplement this with your comments. >> >> >> * If you *don't* support its advancement, respond with a line >> containing something like the following, supplemented by your >> comments - >> >> "I don't support the advancement of this document to the IESG with >> a request for publication as proposed standard, for the following >> reasons:" ... >> >> -Pete >> From kleung@cisco.com Thu Apr 28 14:39:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mip4@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mip4@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22957E06C3 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:39:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4mT0t-QCQXyo for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4271E06A6 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:39:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=kleung@cisco.com; l=3831; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1304026747; x=1305236347; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to; bh=42Fslddkup7pr3tvzUMkZHRSK0ttPFlIYWvlvzW2m8Q=; b=QqsLv7chiPFvc6j5FsmXBFgFH0Ll8alL1eL4O2YDel7cIJ/9r8nd/FDa RGAO6TTHJ8xUE/otV/cSgOjm1egtGT3C0MiJZB2evhWIF5PX8WXn/nYc+ 0g9lx3RggO3dOTjwHIbNtDRWSkLWhqhRk41G1PV4KOjfRLa30Rfd8Y0sA Q=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgkBAFTeuU2rRDoH/2dsb2JhbACYDo14d6kVnRKFdgSGCYxwig4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,283,1301875200"; d="scan'208";a="438473621" Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Apr 2011 21:38:57 +0000 Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3SLcvu7026862; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:38:57 GMT Received: from xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.85]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:38:57 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:38:56 -0700 Message-ID: <2979E38DD6FC6544B789C8DAD7BAFC520EBB678F@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <4DB982F7.2040009@gmail.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [Mip4] Working Group LastCall ondraft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-dynamic-04.txt Thread-Index: AcwFtjF3HxpLHBTfQOCQDzuTNKcPyAAMARDA References: <2979E38DD6FC6544B789C8DAD7BAFC520EBB6208@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com> <4DB982F7.2040009@gmail.com> From: "Kent Leung (kleung)" To: "Alexandru Petrescu" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Apr 2011 21:38:57.0923 (UTC) FILETIME=[AE28C530:01CC05EC] Subject: Re: [Mip4] Working Group LastCall ondraft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-dynamic-04.txt X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:39:09 -0000 Hi Alex. Thanks for the review. I'll fix the reference and typo. I'm = not aware implementation of this specific draft. Although there are = deployments using this method. I don't know of any implementation or = deployment using the DHCP approach.=20 Kent -----Original Message----- From: mip4-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mip4-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of = Alexandru Petrescu Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 8:09 AM To: mip4@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Mip4] Working Group LastCall = ondraft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-dynamic-04.txt Draft looks ok. Reference to Mobile IPv4 should be updated (rfc5944 obsoletes rfc3344). Are there prototype implementations about it? We could discuss new reply codes (i.e. MR requests a prefix allocation but HA refuses). "extensiona" is a, typo should be "extension" We could specify the MR such that when it receives such a prefix from its HA then it writes it in its local dhcpd.conf, or otherwise put, it uses that MNP for serving autoconfiguration purposes of the LFNs attaching to it. The goal proper of this draft is this. What happened to http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-johnson-dhc-subnet-alloc-00 ? If there exist a DHCP implementation doing this subnet allocation then it makes sense to document it for NEMO. Otherwise the behaviour in the draft seems ok. Alex Le 27/04/2011 21:33, Kent Leung (kleung) a =E9crit : > Hi Pete. I agree and will make the suggested changes before > publishing the next version. > > Kent > > -----Original Message----- From: mip4-bounces@ietf.org > [mailto:mip4-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pete McCann Sent: > Wednesday, April 27, 2011 12:24 PM To: mip4@ietf.org Subject: Re: > [Mip4] Working Group Last Call > ondraft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-dynamic-04.txt > > Hi, All, > > This WGLC is ending tonight. So far we have received no comments, > but I think the draft is short and straightforward and we all > understand it. > > I read it over this afternoon and the only comment I have is to > change the term "mobile client" to "Mobile Router" to be consistent > with the terms in 5177 (note the capitalization). > > -Pete > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Pete McCann > wrote: >> This message announces a WG last call on: >> >> "Dynamic Prefix Allocation for NEMOv4" >> draft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-dynamic-04.txt >> >> The base NEMOv4 specification defines extensions to Mobile IPv4 for >> mobile networks. This specification defines a dynamic prefix >> allocation mechanism. >> >> This draft is intended for publication as a Proposed Standard. The >> last call will conclude at 24:00 UTC on Wednesday, April 27, 2011. >> >> A URL for this Internet-Draft is: >> >> = >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Please >> respond to this WG last call: >> >> >> >> * If you have no comments on the draft, and support its >> advancement, simply respond with a line containing something like >> >> "I support the advancement of this document to the IESG with a >> request for publication as proposed standard." >> >> If you have comments, please use a line similar to the one above, >> and supplement this with your comments. >> >> >> * If you *don't* support its advancement, respond with a line >> containing something like the following, supplemented by your >> comments - >> >> "I don't support the advancement of this document to the IESG with >> a request for publication as proposed standard, for the following >> reasons:" ... >> >> -Pete >> --=20 Mip4 mailing list: Mip4@ietf.org Web interface: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4 Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/ From mccap@petoni.org Fri Apr 29 13:33:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mip4@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mip4@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08218E06A4 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:33:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.977 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o15e9P44B9uN for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ABEDE068F for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so3159314fxm.31 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:33:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.54.219 with SMTP id r27mr1898443fag.124.1304109233099; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:33:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.4.215 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:33:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [173.103.128.129] In-Reply-To: <2979E38DD6FC6544B789C8DAD7BAFC520EBB6B38@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com> References: <2979E38DD6FC6544B789C8DAD7BAFC520EBB6208@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com> <4DB982F7.2040009@gmail.com> <2979E38DD6FC6544B789C8DAD7BAFC520EBB678F@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com> <2979E38DD6FC6544B789C8DAD7BAFC520EBB6B38@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:33:53 -0400 Message-ID: From: Pete McCann To: "Kent Leung (kleung)" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: mip4@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Mip4] Working Group LastCall ondraft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-dynamic-04.txt X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 20:33:56 -0000 Hi, Kent, Ok, go ahead and upload v05 and I will submit it. -Pete On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Kent Leung (kleung) wr= ote: > I'm not sure it's necessary to say much more. =A0The protocol is between = MR and HA. =A0Whatever MR do with the prefixes is implementation dependent. > > I think the draft v05 is ready to go to IESG.. > > Kent > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pete McCann [mailto:mccap@petoni.org] > Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 4:11 PM > To: Kent Leung (kleung) > Subject: Re: [Mip4] Working Group LastCall ondraft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-dynam= ic-04.txt > > Maybe we should just put somewhere that the MR can allocate > addresses from the prefixes it has been assigned to nodes on its > Mobile Network using means outside the scope of this specification. > I don't think we should get into the details of DHCP options. > > -Pete > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Kent Leung (kleung) w= rote: >> Hi Alex. =A0Thanks for the review. I'll fix the reference and typo. =A0I= 'm not aware implementation of this specific draft. =A0Although there are d= eployments using this method. =A0I don't know of any implementation or depl= oyment using the DHCP approach. >> >> Kent >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: mip4-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mip4-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of = Alexandru Petrescu >> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 8:09 AM >> To: mip4@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [Mip4] Working Group LastCall ondraft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-dyna= mic-04.txt >> >> Draft looks ok. >> >> Reference to Mobile IPv4 should be updated (rfc5944 obsoletes rfc3344). >> >> Are there prototype implementations about it? >> >> We could discuss new reply codes (i.e. MR requests a prefix allocation >> but HA refuses). >> >> "extensiona" is a, typo should be >> "extension" >> >> We could specify the MR such that when it receives such a prefix from >> its HA then it writes it in its local dhcpd.conf, or otherwise put, it >> uses that MNP for serving autoconfiguration purposes of the LFNs >> attaching to it. =A0The goal proper of this draft is this. >> >> What happened to >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-johnson-dhc-subnet-alloc-00 ? =A0If the= re >> exist a DHCP implementation doing this subnet allocation then it makes >> sense to document it for NEMO. >> >> Otherwise the behaviour in the draft seems ok. >> >> Alex >> >> Le 27/04/2011 21:33, Kent Leung (kleung) a =E9crit : >>> Hi Pete. I agree and will make the suggested changes before >>> publishing the next version. >>> >>> Kent >>> >>> -----Original Message----- From: mip4-bounces@ietf.org >>> [mailto:mip4-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pete McCann Sent: >>> Wednesday, April 27, 2011 12:24 PM To: mip4@ietf.org Subject: Re: >>> [Mip4] Working Group Last Call >>> ondraft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-dynamic-04.txt >>> >>> Hi, All, >>> >>> This WGLC is ending tonight. =A0So far we have received no comments, >>> but I think the draft is short and straightforward and we all >>> understand it. >>> >>> I read it over this afternoon and the only comment I have is to >>> change the term "mobile client" to "Mobile Router" to be consistent >>> with the terms in 5177 (note the capitalization). >>> >>> -Pete >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Pete McCann >>> wrote: >>>> This message announces a WG last call on: >>>> >>>> "Dynamic Prefix Allocation for NEMOv4" >>>> draft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-dynamic-04.txt >>>> >>>> The base NEMOv4 specification defines extensions to Mobile IPv4 for >>>> mobile networks. =A0This specification defines a dynamic prefix >>>> allocation mechanism. >>>> >>>> This draft is intended for publication as a Proposed Standard. The >>>> last call will conclude at 24:00 UTC on Wednesday, April 27, 2011. >>>> >>>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> Please >>>> >> respond to this WG last call: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> * If you have no comments on the draft, and support its >>>> advancement, simply respond with a line containing something like >>>> >>>> "I support the advancement of this document to the IESG with a >>>> request for publication as proposed standard." >>>> >>>> If you have comments, please use a line similar to the one above, >>>> and supplement this with your comments. >>>> >>>> >>>> * If you *don't* support its advancement, respond with a line >>>> containing something like the following, supplemented by your >>>> comments - >>>> >>>> "I don't support the advancement of this document to the IESG with >>>> a request for publication as proposed standard, for the following >>>> reasons:" ... >>>> >>>> -Pete >>>> >> >> -- >> Mip4 mailing list: Mip4@ietf.org >> =A0 =A0Web interface: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4 >> =A0 =A0 Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.htm= l >> Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/ >> -- >> Mip4 mailing list: Mip4@ietf.org >> =A0 =A0Web interface: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4 >> =A0 =A0 Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.htm= l >> Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/ >> >