
From luo.wen@zte.com.cn  Tue Oct 18 02:05:06 2011
Return-Path: <luo.wen@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: mobopts@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mobopts@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168BC21F8C56 for <mobopts@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 02:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.839
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.839 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YIeHbDKI7ZgR for <mobopts@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 02:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx7.zte.com.cn (mx7.zte.com.cn [202.103.147.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0001721F8C59 for <mobopts@irtf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 02:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.3.21] by [192.168.168.15] with StormMail ESMTP id 20387.2079350001; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:04:58 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse02.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id p9I94lnf054626 for <mobopts@irtf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:04:48 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from luo.wen@zte.com.cn)
To: mobopts@irtf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 1BAECA5F:83B134C0-4825792D:0031CE09; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
Message-ID: <OF1BAECA5F.83B134C0-ON4825792D.0031CE09-4825792D.0031DF27@zte.com.cn>
From: luo.wen@zte.com.cn
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:04:46 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2011-10-18 17:04:50, Serialize complete at 2011-10-18 17:04:50
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0031DF274825792D_="
X-MAIL: mse02.zte.com.cn p9I94lnf054626
Subject: [Mobopts] A test email, please ignore it, thanks
X-BeenThere: mobopts@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobility Optimizations <mobopts.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/mobopts>, <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/mobopts>
List-Post: <mailto:mobopts@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts>, <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:05:06 -0000

This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 0031DF274825792D_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"


--=_alternative 0031DF274825792D_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"


--=_alternative 0031DF274825792D_=--

From william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov  Thu Oct 20 07:21:55 2011
Return-Path: <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: mobopts@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mobopts@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3958121F8AC9 for <mobopts@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:21:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jvnac-hqHsBt for <mobopts@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndjsnpf01.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsnpf01.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.121]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B59D21F8A57 for <mobopts@irtf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:21:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndjsppt04.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsppt04.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.103]) by ndjsnpf01.ndc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48143328525 for <mobopts@irtf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:21:52 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ndjshub01.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjshub01-pub.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.160]) by ndjsppt04.ndc.nasa.gov (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9KELpuM010880 for <mobopts@irtf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:21:51 -0500
Received: from NDJSSCC07.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.4.178]) by ndjshub01.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.1.160]) with mapi; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:21:51 -0500
From: "Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)" <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
To: "mobopts@irtf.org" <mobopts@irtf.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:21:50 -0500
Thread-Topic: Modem Link Property Advertisements
Thread-Index: AcyPM5v5AwB3tNKpRWmTwZ+KoOTkyg==
Message-ID: <C93405CC-DB20-4FB7-87A4-2D52569EF6AA@nasa.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813, 1.0.211, 0.0.0000 definitions=2011-10-20_06:2011-10-20, 2011-10-20, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
Subject: [Mobopts] Modem Link Property Advertisements
X-BeenThere: mobopts@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobility Optimizations <mobopts.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/mobopts>, <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/mobopts>
List-Post: <mailto:mobopts@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts>, <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:21:55 -0000

We have submitted a draft on modem link property advertisements.  After muc=
h internal discussions, we believe the mobopts research group is the best p=
lace to address this issue. =20

This draft addresses "examination of the feasibility of generic mechanisms =
that allow tighter integration of the link layer with the IP layer for impr=
oving handover performance" as well as allowing applications and routing pr=
otocols and even new concepts such as disruption/delay tolerant networking =
(DTN) to have some clue of network connectivity and link layer characterist=
ics even if the host / router / forwarding agent is multiple hops away from=
 the modem.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ivancic-mobopts-modemlpa-00

One area the I would be interested in getting feedback on is the use of Pro=
tocol version 4 (IPv4) organizational-scoped multicast and Internet Protoco=
l version 6 (IPv6) site-local multicast vs. unicast for signalling link con=
ditions past the directly attached local-link.


Will Ivancic
