
From nobody Thu Oct  1 16:21:43 2020
Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C833A0A02; Thu,  1 Oct 2020 16:21:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6eHn_2pC25NL; Thu,  1 Oct 2020 16:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DD593A0A01; Thu,  1 Oct 2020 16:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 091NLUU4013447 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 19:21:32 -0400
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 16:21:30 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Stewart Bryant <sb@stewartbryant.com>
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework@ietf.org>,  "mpls-ads@ietf.org" <mpls-ads@ietf.org>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <20201001232130.GQ89563@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <2A8FF52B-BE61-44AF-B98C-9E5B75B83BBD@stewartbryant.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <2A8FF52B-BE61-44AF-B98C-9E5B75B83BBD@stewartbryant.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/m5ZgIvbPe4d1-wd_Zf-vkzH-XcU>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IESG comments on draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework - first tranche (security)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 23:21:42 -0000

Hi Stewart,

Thanks for the updates.
Your proposals look fine to me modulo typos ("anone", "wwhere").

-Ben

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:07:38AM +0000, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> I am working my way through the various IESG comments on  draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework.
> 
> I have looked at the comments by Roman and Benjamin, but need to pause for a few days to do other work. My proposed disposition of the comments is as follows.
> 
> I thank all of the reviewers and will address the other comments and upload a new version of the text shortly.
> 
> Bets regards
> 
> Stewart
> 
> From Roman Danyliw
> 
> ** Section 3.  What is “triggering IPFIX inspection”?  I wasn’t familiar with this phrasing.  Is the intent to trigger more in-depth analysis of header information, as opposed to “triggering … DPI”, which will do content inspection?
> 
> SB> I have changed this to
> 
> "triggering an IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) {{RFC7011}} capture"
> 
> 
> ** Editorial Nits:
> -- Section 3.  Typo. s/co-ordinating/coordinating/
> 
> SB> Fixed
> 
> -- Section 4.1.  Typo. s/are present/is present/
> 
> I think the original is correct (there is a plurality of cases), I will leave it to the RFC Editor.
> 
> 
> -- Section 5.  Typo. s/invalidate the certain uses/invalidate certain uses/
> 
> SB> Fixed
> 
> ===========
> 
> Benjamin Kaduk
> 
> I agree with the TSV-ART reviewer that some discussion of how/why the
> RFC 8372 requirements are met would have been welcome.
> 
> Other than that, I basically only have nits and minor comments; this is
> pretty straightforward and well-specified.
> 
> Section 1
> 
> The Introduction is essentially a verbatim copy of the Abstract with
> formatting changes.  It seems likely that the Introduction could be
> expanded slightly if desired.
> 
>    [RFC8372] (MPLS Flow Identification Considerations) describes the
>    requirement for introducing flow identities within the MPLS
> 
> nit: "requirement" singular or "requirements" plural?  (It itself seems
> to only claim to give "considerations" relevant for flow identification.)
> 
> SB> I think in this context singular is correct, but will discuss with RFC Editor.
> 
>    architecture.  This document describes a method of accomplishing this
> 
> nit: the second "this" that is to be accomplished doesn't have a
> terribly precise referent -- it is in some sense "accomplishing the task
> of meeting the requirements" but not "accomplishing the requirements”.
> 
> SB> Changed to "This document describes a method of providing the required identification by using a"
> 
>    by using a technique called Synonymous Flow Labels (SFL) in which
>    labels which mimic the behaviour of other labels provide the
>    identification service.  These identifiers can be used to trigger
>    per-flow operations on the packet at the receiving label switching
>    router.
> 
> nit: we currently introduce the LSR acronym in Section 3 but this seems
> to be the first non-Abstract usage.
> 
> SB> I qualify labels by adding MPLS - "behaviour of other MPLS labels"
> 
> Section 3
> 
>    An SFL is defined to be a label that causes exactly the same
>    behaviour at the egress Label Switching Router (LSR) as the label it
>    replaces, but in addition also causes an agreed action to take place
>    on the packet.  There are many possible additional actions such as
> 
> nit: is this "agreed action" on the path or also at the egress?  If at
> the egress, then "exactly the same behavior" is debatable, in a pedantic
> sense.
> 
> SB> I think technically the English is correct, but five years after I first wrote it
> I think it could be polished. It now says:
> 
> "An SFL is defined to be a label that causes exactly the same
> behaviour at the egress Label Switching Router (LSR) as the label it
> replaces, but except that it also causes anone or more additional agreed actions to take place
> on the packet.  "
> 
> 
>    the measurement of the number of received packets in a flow,
>    triggering IPFIX inspection, triggering other types of Deep Packet
> 
> nit: while IPFIX appears on
> 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/abbrev.expansion.txt
>  it is not
> marked as "well-known", thus probably merits expansion.
> 
> SB> Expansion added
> 
>    acceptable for scaling reasons.  We therefore have no choice but to
>    introduce an additional label.  Where penultimate hop popping (PHP)
>    is in use, the semantics of this additional label can be similar to
>    the LSP label.  Where PHP is not in use, the semantics are similar to
>    an MPLS explicit NULL [RFC3032].  In both of these cases the label
>    has the additional semantics of the SFL.
> 
> [I note that here we weaken the statement to be only "similar to", not
> "exactly the same”.]
> 
> SB> It cannot be exactly the same as it has the additional SFL properties, so I think “similar" is correct.
> 
> 
>    Finally we need to consider the case where there is no MPLS
>    application label such as occurs when sending IP over an LSP.  In
> 
> nit/editorial: I would consider mentioning the application label
> earlier, to accentuate the contrasting case being introduced here.
> 
> SB> Good point, I have changed the start of the PW text to
> 
> "To illustrate the use of this technology, we start by  considering
> the case wwhere there is an "application" label in the MPLS label stack.
> As a first example, let us consider a
> pseudowire (PW) {{RFC3985}} on which it is desired to make
> packet loss measurement."
> 
> Section 4
> 
>    As noted in Section 3 it is necessary to consider two cases:
>    [...]
>    2.  Single label stack
> 
> (editorial) Some minor rewording in Section 3 to specifically mention
> the "single label stack" case in such terms would probably help the
> document feel more cohesive.  (I assume it's meant to be the converse of
> the "application label present" case, i.e., the "there is no MPLS
> application label such as occurs when sending IP over an LSP" case.)
> 
> SB> Changed the text to "Finally we need to consider the case where there is no MPLS
> application label such as occurs when sending IP over an LSP, i.e. there is a single label in the MPLS label stack."
> 
> Section 4.1
> 
>    At the egress LSR the LSP label is popped (if present).  Then the SFL
>    is processed in exactly the same way as the corresponding application
>    label would have been processed.
> 
> [Just noting that "exact" is used here; I have no specific comment]
> 
> SB> On reflection changed this to :" At the egress LSR the LSP label is popped (if present).  Then the SFL
> is processed executing both the synonymous function and the corresponding application function.
> 
> Section 4.1.1
> 
>    that the SFL is synonymous with.  However it is recognised that, if
>    there is an applications need, the SFL MAY be to some other value.
> 
> (nit) Barry already noted the missing "set", but I think it's also "the
> TTL and TC bits in the SFL" and not the SFL itself -- the SFL itself is
> inherently a different value, otherwise it would be called the
> "identical flow label" and we probably wouldn't be writing a document
> about it :)
> 
> SB> Good catch. I have changed the text to
> 
> "However, it is recognised that if there
> is an applications need  these fields in the SFL Label Stack Entry (LSE) MAY be set these to some other value."
> 
> Section 4.2
> 
> I wondered to myself for Figure 1, and wonder out loud here for Figure
> 2, if we can make some indication that the "May be PHPed" applies to
> both the "Normal" label stack as well as to the "with SFL" label stack.
> (For Figure 1 it was vertically aligned, but is not so, here.)
> 
> SB> In Fig 1 and Fig 2 added PHP note inside the stack diagrams
> SB> to make it clear where it applied. Also make clear BoS applies
> SB> to both sides.
> 
>    If the LSP label is present, it processed exactly as it would
>    normally processed and then it is popped.  This reveals the SFL which
>    in the case of [RFC6374] measurements is simply counted and then
>    discarded.  In this respect the processing of the SFL is synonymous
> 
> nit: it's not entirely clear to me why this specific case merits mention of
> RFC 6374 measurement but we don't want to mention it anywhere earlier.
> 
> SB> We originally put it in because this we wanted to show that in some important cases
> SB> SFL behaviour was simple and in some cases already supported by the natural
> SB> behaviour of the existing h/w.
> 
> Section 4.3
> 
> Is the Aggregate SFL also in some sense "synonymous with Explicit NULL"
> (as was mentioned in Figure 2)?
> 
> 
> SB> It’s behaviour is similar, but as I remember an explicit NULL must be BoS.
> SB> So am reluctant to  add that note.
> SB> Aligned Fig 3 with the changes made to Fig 1 & 2
> 
> Section 5
> 
>    2.  The operator can elect to use [RFC6790] Entropy Labels in a
>        network that fully supports this type of ECMP.  If this approach
>        is adopted, the intervening MPLS network MUST NOT load balance on
>        any packet field other than the entropy label.  Note that this is
>        stricter than the text in Section 4.2 of [RFC6790].  In networks
> 
> Is Section 4.2 ("Ingress LSR") really the best reference in RFC 6790?
> Section 4.3 seems much more relevant, to me.
> 
> SB> Good catch, 4.3 is the correct reference.
> 
>        in which the ECMP decision is independent of both the value of
>        any other label in the label stack, and the MPLS payload, the
>        path of the flow with the SFL will be congruent with the path
>        without the SFL.
> 
> (side note) what would the ECMP decision be made on, in that case?  A
> random number generator?
> 
> SB> The background is that some P routers load balance a number of
> SB> fields rather than on just the EL. I will clarify. It now says:
> 
>    "In networks in which the ECMP decision is based solely
>     on the entropy lable, and ignores the value of all other labels
>     in the label stack, and ignores all field in the MPLS payload,
>     the path of the flow with the SFL will be congruent with
>     the path without the SFL. "
> 
> 
> 
> Section 6
> 
> Thank you for noting the privacy considerations even though the
> incremental exposure is fairly small!
> 
> I might note that whenever IPFIX or other DPI techniques are used, their
> relevant privacy considerations apply.
> 
>    The inclusion of originating and/or flow information in a packet
>    provides more identity information and hence potentially degrades the
>    privacy of the communication.  Whilst the inclusion of the additional
> 
> SB> Note added.
> 
> At risk of banality, I suggest "potentially degrades the privacy of the
> communiation to an attacker in position to observe the added
> identifier", to subtly emphasize that the relevant attacker here has
> capabilities that already allow for similar types of attack.  That is,
> what's new for the attacker here is that they get some signal as to how
> the ingress decides to classify traffic -- they already have all the
> traffic in the first place and could be doing their own classification
> on it.
> 
> SB> change made.
> 
>    granularity does allow greater insight into the flow characteristics
>    it does not specifically identify which node originated the packet
>    other than by inspection of the network at the point of ingress, or
>    inspection of the control protocol packets.  This privacy threat may
> 
> nit: I suggest
> s/other than by/unless the attacker can/;
> s/inspection of/inspect/
> 
> (since the attacker needs to both observe the labeled
> traffic and obtain the origination-mapping information in order to
> effectuate the identification).
> 
> SB> yes that is cleared - change made.
> 
> Section 7
> 
> I think that the type of attack opened up by having multiple synonyms
> for conceptulaly "the same traffic", that Tero noted in the secdir
> review, would be in cases where the attacker is sending traffic over the
> LSP in question and knows both the classification algorithm used to
> apply the SFL and the nature of the DPI performed on SFL-marked traffic,
> and is thus able to ensure that whatever nefarious things they are doing
> that would have been noticed by the DPI instead take the non-DPI path
> and remain undetected.  Now, AFAICT the type of DPI envisioned here is
> mostly not going to be looking for nefarious things, and even the
> existence of such nefarious things that need to be going over this LSP
> that the attacker can already send traffic over seems a bit contrived,
> but that's my take on the additional incremental attack that this
> mechanism opens up.
> 
> SB> Yes, if an attacker can avoid the DPI triggers by disguising the traffic
> SB> they can do that regardless of the SFL mechanism, so I don’t think
> SB> there is an SFL specific risk.
> 
>    There are no new security issues associated with the MPLS dataplane.
>    Any control protocol used to request SFLs will need to ensure the
>    legitimacy of the request.
> 
> I'd suggest mentioning authorization checks as well -- a request can in
> some sense still be "legitimate" even if the requestor is not currently
> authorized to receive the service.
> 
> SB> I have extended the text to say: "Any
> control protocol used to request SFLs will need to ensure the
> legitimacy of the request, i.e. that the requesting node is authorised
> to make that SFL request by the network operator."
> 
> Section 10.2
> 
> Hmm, in some reading "can elect to use [RFC6790] Entropy Labels" [..]
> MUST NOT load balance on any packet field other than the entropy label"
> makes 6790 a normative reference (required reading for an optional
> feature).
> 
> SB> Yes, I have moved it.
> 
> 


From nobody Fri Oct  2 08:59:08 2020
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B433A10E0; Fri,  2 Oct 2020 08:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wM74GWvCgu2P; Fri,  2 Oct 2020 08:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4F763A1067; Fri,  2 Oct 2020 08:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 092Fx13m031451; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:59:01 +0100
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBB922101; Fri,  2 Oct 2020 16:59:01 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48C8C22100; Fri,  2 Oct 2020 16:59:01 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.113.82.114]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 092Fx0dL014712 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:59:00 +0100
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'mpls'" <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:59:00 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <00d001d698d4$f1bca890$d535f9b0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AdaY1LuALWlBbybiQBmQ3luSJJ9RCA==
X-Originating-IP: 87.113.82.114
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25702.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--15.021-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--15.021-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25702.001
X-TMASE-Result: 10--15.020600-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 2NMlcyo/elNh21ha8pEX63FPUrVDm6jt4NNiN6MhlPBa1yhTwm1zuTKa PQElmQY4l+QcU0TYMRftQaKQ9741MjeiGq2NlS7FcN+LFb07lxilAfiiC1VA/atNdpFrZXd80u5 faGP8ztTHAR4F/0Z0fd4fvwiLwWPLgeZLVDDbeMK5UUv022NJAgebMc7dN8D4QTf+q86OAUs6bh xUZofOTiR+7RJgNSLeIImdlTSYda+TDlsGaeU3mBPS9Bzbys1RKmiyrJHNh3LWXfwzppZ8SOh9W hyl/82eR7uEnZwYDDtppTe7gG9GO2t5A6iSzaOuwrUhv0kAAvGS0Ed+8sr8mpsoi2XrUn/JyeMt MD9QOgAzDLM3gGacyXQdJ7XfU86ekGUtrowrXLg=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/Tl5QzIOwoFPXEua-kuDfI1eF6Uk>
Subject: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 15:59:06 -0000

I know this is not the most exciting document the working group has ever
produced, but as shepherd I need to see some comments and expressions of
support.

Thanks,
Adrian
-----Original Message-----
From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32
To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call :
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04

Hi MPLS WG,

As previously noted, I'm the shepherd for this document and I'm running the
working group last call as agreed by the chairs.

This email starts a two-week last call on
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update/

Please send your opinions to the mailing list before October 9th.

While yes/no opinions are not without value, it is far more helpful if you
can indicate whether you have read the latest version of the draft, and what
the reasons are for your opinions.

Of course, all of your review comments will be helpful in improving the
document.

Best,
Adrian

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls


From nobody Fri Oct  2 09:04:58 2020
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1023A10E0; Fri,  2 Oct 2020 09:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3LCmto9MXngJ; Fri,  2 Oct 2020 09:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 421843A0BA6; Fri,  2 Oct 2020 09:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (unknown [124.104.122.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 380B131F980; Fri,  2 Oct 2020 18:04:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-rmr@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-rmr@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, Deborah A Brungard <db3546@att.com>, "mpls-ads@ietf.org" <mpls-ads@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <b0453453-b7c9-ed06-f359-459137ad4c2a@pi.nu>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 00:04:22 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/vvtZgmMA6UQLdeTP7PxeldHIbZo>
Subject: [mpls] Document (draft-ietf-mpls-rmr) returned to working group - poll for interest.
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 16:04:57 -0000

Working Group,

This mail starts a two week poll to establish the interest to continue 
work on draft-ietf-mpls-rmr.

draft-ietf-mpls-rmr were returned to the working to the working group 
(about 2 weeks ago).

Normally a document is returned this late in the process when a 
necessary change is discovered that requires working group consensus 
(i.e. a wglc) to implement. This time the document were returned due to 
lack of (or very slow) response to directorate or the IESG reviews.

When a document is returned for a well defined technical change it is 
fairly easy to handle, we make the change and do a wglc.

I have spent time trying to figure out what to do in a case like this. 
There is very little information in our process document. The wg chairs 
has converged on the following small process.

- establish wg interest for the document, i.e. is this something we want 
to do and do we have interest participating in progressing the document.
- leave approximately 2 weeks for working group discussion
- wglc
- when comments from the wglc is resolved, redo the publication request

This document start a two week poll to establish the level of interest 
to continue to work on draft-ietf-mpls-rmr.

Please answer the following 2 questions:

- do you think draft-ietf-mpls-rmr is need and will actually be deployed?

- do you have the cycles to contribute to progressing the document

/Loa
for the working group chairs


-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64


From nobody Fri Oct  2 12:09:43 2020
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDA13A16A5; Fri,  2 Oct 2020 12:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.18.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: mpls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <160166578237.14117.8980156259290974284@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 12:09:42 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/HcMEH6ueZWwMkff3nd7Ec9B4ENk>
Subject: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework-11.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 19:09:43 -0000

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG of the IETF.

        Title           : Synonymous Flow Label Framework
        Authors         : Stewart Bryant
                          Mach Chen
                          George Swallow
                          Siva Sivabalan
                          Gregory Mirsky
	Filename        : draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework-11.txt
	Pages           : 10
	Date            : 2020-10-02

Abstract:
   RFC 8372 (MPLS Flow Identification Considerations) describes the
   requirement for introducing flow identities within the MPLS
   architecture.  This document describes a method of accomplishing this
   by using a technique called Synonymous Flow Labels in which labels
   which mimic the behaviour of other labels provide the identification
   service.  These identifiers can be used to trigger per-flow
   operations on the packet at the receiving label switching router.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework-11
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework-11

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework-11


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/



From nobody Sat Oct  3 00:53:39 2020
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF17B3A0855; Sat,  3 Oct 2020 00:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.11
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.213, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BRQOmB45f2ZC; Sat,  3 Oct 2020 00:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7546F3A0853; Sat,  3 Oct 2020 00:53:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (unknown [124.104.122.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1015321AE7; Sat,  3 Oct 2020 09:53:30 +0200 (CEST)
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
References: <00d001d698d4$f1bca890$d535f9b0$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <9060c238-a407-e07d-85c9-8ccdb188224a@pi.nu>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 15:53:29 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <00d001d698d4$f1bca890$d535f9b0$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/bMb9iO_jas-lPbdz_a8R5eFYz14>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2020 07:53:37 -0000

All,

I agree with Adrian, not very exiting, but the document will simplify 
allocations of the LSP Ping code points.

Please, take some time to review and comment.

/Loa

On 02/10/2020 23:59, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> I know this is not the most exciting document the working group has ever
> produced, but as shepherd I need to see some comments and expressions of
> support.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32
> To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
> Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call :
> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
> 
> Hi MPLS WG,
> 
> As previously noted, I'm the shepherd for this document and I'm running the
> working group last call as agreed by the chairs.
> 
> This email starts a two-week last call on
> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update/
> 
> Please send your opinions to the mailing list before October 9th.
> 
> While yes/no opinions are not without value, it is far more helpful if you
> can indicate whether you have read the latest version of the draft, and what
> the reasons are for your opinions.
> 
> Of course, all of your review comments will be helpful in improving the
> document.
> 
> Best,
> Adrian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 

-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64


From nobody Sat Oct  3 06:14:13 2020
Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93E23A0A84; Sat,  3 Oct 2020 06:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4MPo21D9kQwg; Sat,  3 Oct 2020 06:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x729.google.com (mail-qk1-x729.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::729]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E762B3A0A81; Sat,  3 Oct 2020 06:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x729.google.com with SMTP id q63so6459457qkf.3; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 06:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;  h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=T5U1mkyOl/EB/gVwiB0VJQp+hmKFk8L3fgYBuTi2AcQ=; b=Vld9lWkGdCwzz2UXK47lvsFtAwiFK9ZXwJz/r8+JiAM1MijZznA28NGS9OygmCL/a2 7840ji6yPAI0XfL12C9N4UeDZeH+U+5tlyqLhDftOOJiOAw3kDPFuvgklk4l3CQaFlXV fh9r+7qKZxMnstqtZoqWucW00i3KcW1gPgV7qq8HUsnoQ2ibqKJkgPjZBRN+ZOoPuZQs jEvZLabuskXPO/rx6P50ip++s2tGrQozYK1U6sXz2/1zY9J+UZqC1ZXRVsqXdKzqRVHb mA+vL3IGq0M3/VgfCsNnha2DeX8r3pJI2BVzQwtnmEOccOfDpnjjrlYobe4Hd5a7PDYH jiVA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=T5U1mkyOl/EB/gVwiB0VJQp+hmKFk8L3fgYBuTi2AcQ=; b=jDdLqcPGz5lgOWpghw1sIrn7NpNkmg5YRvQT2nuDm/FtByLLmT5bxM0Px1FR+JwvSQ 4DOiUP3rZ61P+76cPU6yWgVqjNf/lKEa29E3kWL7cfzLYT2U2eo8Jgu0zfl6cfAcxvf5 7Pd+B00WnDUpGF4CrYhnW+zInq56lA5u6PqlDzaOSGUB0JBpEZSJX87AbM6Anfgbk9rM sTxo5CpqsZR3P8i/27vE0qZWbWXZ0EF1ScVIJLsbwdFSCmSwDQLt7WzjCkYsbU0lNCt4 953E8u9/pxwsN4t8M/UmFvJZVOcBFtkmntCfII5a1iFYvyYt0PKP2flchN7zB37VkZaP k5cw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5333Z814mV+wspUj7qmQ6zPEq5bGTCCozFAi+byrEWdSTiLKaUu2 AAA7/ZdERQxCQkYTc7J1dwcyX9OsoHQwKZE+mb7OfW9W
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw9i2GCMk+VtF5zRKmOfApxIDvTCMwYi4TTv/sJ0IshqWXB9UVtG8L4L6hYMfFi8b6WIzGFg4SJ40ozJGEZ/i8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:70d:: with SMTP id 13mr6235360qkc.406.1601730848930;  Sat, 03 Oct 2020 06:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <00d001d698d4$f1bca890$d535f9b0$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <00d001d698d4$f1bca890$d535f9b0$@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 09:13:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU2U7qK1FK0HoVTJqfoyoeCnuXWJ0+2xu5XjJJtQjWpXtA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Cc: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000046bedc05b0c4062f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/C_hceYNOyNsZKgEQpKGzksi38W8>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2020 13:14:12 -0000

--00000000000046bedc05b0c4062f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Adrian,

I just looked through the draft and support its publication. That said, it
would be nice if section 1 included a bit more motivation - what were the
issues with the current states of RFCs 8029 and 8611 (besides needing to be
"more precise"?) and what would be the consequences of leaving things as
they were.

Cheers,
Andy

On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 11:59 AM Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

> I know this is not the most exciting document the working group has ever
> produced, but as shepherd I need to see some comments and expressions of
> support.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32
> To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
> Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call :
> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
>
> Hi MPLS WG,
>
> As previously noted, I'm the shepherd for this document and I'm running the
> working group last call as agreed by the chairs.
>
> This email starts a two-week last call on
> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update/
>
> Please send your opinions to the mailing list before October 9th.
>
> While yes/no opinions are not without value, it is far more helpful if you
> can indicate whether you have read the latest version of the draft, and
> what
> the reasons are for your opinions.
>
> Of course, all of your review comments will be helpful in improving the
> document.
>
> Best,
> Adrian
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>

--00000000000046bedc05b0c4062f
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Adrian,<div><br></div><div>I just looked through the draft=
 and support its publication. That said, it would be nice if section 1 incl=
uded a bit more motivation - what were the issues with the current states o=
f RFCs 8029 and 8611 (besides needing to be &quot;more precise&quot;?) and =
what would be the consequences of leaving things as they were.</div><div><b=
r></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Andy</div></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quot=
e"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 11:59 AM Ad=
rian Farrel &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk">adrian@olddog.co.uk<=
/a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0=
px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I=
 know this is not the most exciting document the working group has ever<br>
produced, but as shepherd I need to see some comments and expressions of<br=
>
support.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Adrian<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: mpls &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org" target=3D"_blank">m=
pls-bounces@ietf.org</a>&gt; On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel<br>
Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32<br>
To: &#39;mpls&#39; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:mpls@ietf.org" target=3D"_blank">m=
pls@ietf.org</a>&gt;<br>
Cc: <a href=3D"mailto:draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org" =
target=3D"_blank">draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org</a><b=
r>
Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call :<br>
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04<br>
<br>
Hi MPLS WG,<br>
<br>
As previously noted, I&#39;m the shepherd for this document and I&#39;m run=
ning the<br>
working group last call as agreed by the chairs.<br>
<br>
This email starts a two-week last call on<br>
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04<br>
<a href=3D"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-regist=
ries-update/" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://datatracker.ietf=
.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update/</a><br>
<br>
Please send your opinions to the mailing list before October 9th.<br>
<br>
While yes/no opinions are not without value, it is far more helpful if you<=
br>
can indicate whether you have read the latest version of the draft, and wha=
t<br>
the reasons are for your opinions.<br>
<br>
Of course, all of your review comments will be helpful in improving the<br>
document.<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
Adrian<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
mpls mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:mpls@ietf.org" target=3D"_blank">mpls@ietf.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls" rel=3D"noreferrer" t=
arget=3D"_blank">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
mpls mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:mpls@ietf.org" target=3D"_blank">mpls@ietf.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls" rel=3D"noreferrer" t=
arget=3D"_blank">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls</a><br>
</blockquote></div>

--00000000000046bedc05b0c4062f--


From nobody Sun Oct  4 01:45:08 2020
Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CDDE3A1312; Sun,  4 Oct 2020 01:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=csperkins.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EQFdUI8J3idL; Sun,  4 Oct 2020 01:44:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from haggis.mythic-beasts.com (haggis.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:86:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FB633A1310; Sun,  4 Oct 2020 01:44:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=csperkins.org; s=mythic-beasts-k1; h=To:Date:Subject:From; bh=BFllCOL8u5m39IHYBogytPTvza+C2xIT3aVJZPWdmzg=; b=LHGiP3/MEnXvJqUdCEGMJXC5N6 EJo2D4EgczA7lHxNA8tpfp3SX/71hhLFikUA1NpyYAYbitni74mdgtikIZPITdV6Zn+1KjSRjT710 5LKtGxVmMN0UpU3EgDfDhLU/7LQrdLruLeRSPVc0vJDiTuCHovREDicY91i8g4PuUhEXSkc0dvqXt GbGgxomYqL0PKp+2dmtn3B7KxybVN2NzrO1Dk4HqGKwZqd+KTOkWjOkjA7ihd7uowFr2Am0r/nvoy r9ZVP4pbZv8AlSc9PQf3qC3NKiXOEWN92Z6sGSy+weTPCD9ZJgCRCzncWm+OH7dpfhGLI9HKbVNwE dyqRqlMw==;
Received: from [81.187.2.149] (port=45842 helo=[192.168.0.67]) by haggis.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1kOzdX-0002RZ-Vw; Sun, 04 Oct 2020 09:44:56 +0100
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Message-Id: <D9FA1A91-E5F9-49F3-ADB2-13EDBAAB5C49@csperkins.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AFA77298-BC5E-4643-96AA-AECB41A6233A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\))
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 09:44:50 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CABRz93UuKp65mdEUCBJFs4BczJYF95VPUuHuS45qwcBzCzjDOA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-rmr.all@ietf.org, tsv-art@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
To: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti.kompella@gmail.com>
References: <157299662261.4537.207640958778372329@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABRz93UuKp65mdEUCBJFs4BczJYF95VPUuHuS45qwcBzCzjDOA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 4
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/2VWnkxhqxsSCMCfHPC_oTs_ExKw>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-rmr-12
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2020 08:45:01 -0000

--Apple-Mail=_AFA77298-BC5E-4643-96AA-AECB41A6233A
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8

Hi Kireeti,

Apologies for not following-up on this earlier myself. These changes =
look to address my concerns.=20

Colin




> On 16 Sep 2020, at 15:52, Kireeti Kompella =
<kireeti.kompella@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> Hi Colin,
>=20
> Sorry for the very belated response!
>=20
> Thank you for your review.  All of your comments have been addressed =
in the -13 update; section 1.2 has a summary of the changes, marked with =
[TAR] for the Transport Area Review.  Section 4.2 has updated text on =
timers; unfortunately, there are two typos here: one, this change was =
made in response to TAR, not SAD; two, the actual change was duplicated. =
 Section 5 defers the value of the OAM timer to the OAM protocol being =
used.
>=20
> The nits in section 1 & 1.1 have also been fixed.
>=20
> Hopefully, all your concerns have been addressed.
>=20
> Cheers,
> Kireeti.
>=20
>=20
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 3:30 PM Colin Perkins via Datatracker =
<noreply@ietf.org <mailto:noreply@ietf.org>> wrote:
> Reviewer: Colin Perkins
> Review result: Almost Ready
>=20
> This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review =
team's
> ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were =
written
> primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the =
document's
> authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to =
the IETF
> discussion list for information.
>=20
> When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider =
this
> review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always =
CC
> tsv-art@ietf.org <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org> if you reply to or forward =
this review.
>=20
> The draft describes how MPLS can be used to configure ring topologies,
> as is frequently used to provide resilience. This seems like a =
reasonable
> thing to do - indeed I'm surprised such a specification doesn't =
already
> exist. =46rom a transport perspective, this looks reasonable, but I do =
have
> some comments:
>=20
> - The draft discusses resilience mechanisms, by which the ring can be
> used to protect from link failures. There is, however, no discussion =
of
> how to recover from loss of the various messages used to announce and
> manage the ring network. It may be that the protocol used to convey
> these messages provides appropriate reliability mechanisms and the
> draft just needs to reference and clarify that. However, if not, it =
would
> seem worth considering robustness to loss of the ring advertisement
> and maintenance messages.
>=20
> - Auto-discovery in Section 4 uses timers T1 and T2. It's not clear =
what
> is the timeout value for these timers, and whether their value needs =
to
> be statically chosen or somehow tuned based on the size of the =
network.=20
>=20
> - Similarly, Section 5 on Ring OAM specifies two timers. These have =
fixed
> values of 3.3ms and 1s. It's not clear why these values were chosen or =
why
> they are correct.
>=20
> Nits:
> - The Introduction talks about "transport networks". It's not clear =
what
> is meant by this, and there might be an alternative term that's =
clearer.
>=20
> - The last paragraph before Section 1.1 states: =E2=80=9CThe intent is =
not to
>  construct rings in a mesh network,  and use those for protection=E2=80=9D=
. I
> can=E2=80=99t parse the grammar here =E2=80=93 can you clarify?
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> Kireeti
> --=20
> last-call mailing list
> last-call@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call


--Apple-Mail=_AFA77298-BC5E-4643-96AA-AECB41A6233A
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=utf-8

<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dutf-8"></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; =
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=3D"">Hi =
Kireeti,<div class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div class=3D"">Apologies =
for not following-up on this earlier myself. These changes look to =
address my concerns.&nbsp;</div><div class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div =
class=3D"">Colin</div><div class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div =
class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div class=3D""><br class=3D""><div><br =
class=3D""><blockquote type=3D"cite" class=3D""><div class=3D"">On 16 =
Sep 2020, at 15:52, Kireeti Kompella &lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:kireeti.kompella@gmail.com" =
class=3D"">kireeti.kompella@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:</div><br =
class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=3D""><div dir=3D"ltr" =
class=3D""><div class=3D"">Hi Colin,</div><div class=3D""><br =
class=3D""></div><div class=3D"">Sorry for the very belated =
response!</div><div class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div class=3D"">Thank =
you for your review.&nbsp; All of your comments have been addressed in =
the -13 update; section 1.2 has a summary of the changes, marked with =
[TAR] for the Transport Area Review.&nbsp; Section 4.2 has updated text =
on timers; unfortunately, there are two typos here: one, this change was =
made in response to TAR, not SAD; two, the actual change was =
duplicated.&nbsp; Section 5 defers the value of the OAM timer to the OAM =
protocol being used.<br class=3D""></div><div class=3D""><br =
class=3D""></div><div class=3D"">The nits in section 1 &amp; 1.1 have =
also been fixed.<br class=3D""></div><div class=3D""><br =
class=3D""></div><div class=3D"">Hopefully, all your concerns have been =
addressed.</div><div class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div =
class=3D"">Cheers,</div><div class=3D"">Kireeti.<br class=3D""></div><div =
class=3D""><br class=3D""></div></div><br class=3D""><div =
class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Tue, Nov =
5, 2019 at 3:30 PM Colin Perkins via Datatracker &lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:noreply@ietf.org" class=3D"">noreply@ietf.org</a>&gt; =
wrote:<br class=3D""></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" =
style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid =
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Reviewer: Colin Perkins<br class=3D"">
Review result: Almost Ready<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review =
team's<br class=3D"">
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were =
written<br class=3D"">
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the =
document's<br class=3D"">
authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to =
the IETF<br class=3D"">
discussion list for information.<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider =
this<br class=3D"">
review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always =
CC<br class=3D"">
<a href=3D"mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org" target=3D"_blank" =
class=3D"">tsv-art@ietf.org</a> if you reply to or forward this =
review.<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
The draft describes how MPLS can be used to configure ring =
topologies,<br class=3D"">
as is frequently used to provide resilience. This seems like a =
reasonable<br class=3D"">
thing to do - indeed I'm surprised such a specification doesn't =
already<br class=3D"">
exist. =46rom a transport perspective, this looks reasonable, but I do =
have<br class=3D"">
some comments:<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
- The draft discusses resilience mechanisms, by which the ring can be<br =
class=3D"">
used to protect from link failures. There is, however, no discussion =
of<br class=3D"">
how to recover from loss of the various messages used to announce and<br =
class=3D"">
manage the ring network. It may be that the protocol used to convey<br =
class=3D"">
these messages provides appropriate reliability mechanisms and the<br =
class=3D"">
draft just needs to reference and clarify that. However, if not, it =
would<br class=3D"">
seem worth considering robustness to loss of the ring advertisement<br =
class=3D"">
and maintenance messages.<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
- Auto-discovery in Section 4 uses timers T1 and T2. It's not clear =
what<br class=3D"">
is the timeout value for these timers, and whether their value needs =
to<br class=3D"">
be statically chosen or somehow tuned based on the size of the network. =
<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
- Similarly, Section 5 on Ring OAM specifies two timers. These have =
fixed<br class=3D"">
values of 3.3ms and 1s. It's not clear why these values were chosen or =
why<br class=3D"">
they are correct.<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
Nits:<br class=3D"">
- The Introduction talks about "transport networks". It's not clear =
what<br class=3D"">
is meant by this, and there might be an alternative term that's =
clearer.<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
- The last paragraph before Section 1.1 states: =E2=80=9CThe intent is =
not to<br class=3D"">
&nbsp;construct rings in a mesh network,&nbsp; and use those for =
protection=E2=80=9D. I<br class=3D"">
can=E2=80=99t parse the grammar here =E2=80=93 can you clarify?<br =
class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
</blockquote></div><br clear=3D"all" class=3D""><br class=3D"">-- <br =
class=3D""><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature">Kireeti</div>
-- <br class=3D"">last-call mailing list<br class=3D""><a =
href=3D"mailto:last-call@ietf.org" class=3D"">last-call@ietf.org</a><br =
class=3D"">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call<br =
class=3D""></div></blockquote></div><br class=3D""></div></body></html>=

--Apple-Mail=_AFA77298-BC5E-4643-96AA-AECB41A6233A--


From nobody Sun Oct  4 15:03:32 2020
Return-Path: <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A363A0A39; Sun,  4 Oct 2020 15:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.313
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.313 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.213, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jnFK_JLB8Cm5; Sun,  4 Oct 2020 15:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR03-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr30116.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.3.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 787EE3A0ABD; Sun,  4 Oct 2020 15:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=NsO7s0ajzMAsHE3ER3Y3Y9CczlS3LLrQ61vw0oTknPON578PVrEEtVKsH0hKq0xtCwgeCLaTiPCNrcilq3V3L8khews9MKJ1L30gXa8D8lvIh6Z200VOOobK6L5c9JkWnbKRlER4r9XliyD3h0XLdqIAOhlmNqBXCjRWcpj7vuwu4WNgxH2yalOiYxvm5IfFhJZF7+7dKxV682r4QUsXrpCUVspo/UgSl3bDH83MCKFjiHtD3QHL7gd3JqgX9Azg7lrKFqGzuf95kuHHJo7HGhRMbI+gKzSkbXzp8DFHwv5hFp8EQEjG5CnaCXyaXxGR+P5WwkjuOSmxjkUkMsSckQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;  s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=09/UEi/EgynmOZMwXlXk3+tnc9wat5+sfDjL6SUFJvs=; b=Es2+4dYzq52mQRXWhARhRKXUHFk6XZNh+isL84YAKTcyxIL/Yjca5WSLkoeirwLmD2uNlzd0czvLddqi7DAgjzHA/OJe+nAa6A+Z9ojxLwWHAs6M/PJbDBaqRDas8wAteMgrYceQoiGYta9J3k6mOjW1q/iH+WPDdid6BAVUF1p4fxlzWiw84tAPLmTptGtrFov0DlLQsO5lmTrU8dEabBOUVSwJE2CNoEsLIGMLC1xDKs7UurSVbmyIaM3i3YOML03BmM0v+mhID1+cHlA5H3hRpI+u4vhzJw1LHHDo0Q/8JxhtU7DK+xpQaeSgLl0hYsnQR1DtsUgEVbeFuph2MA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nokia.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nokia.com; dkim=pass header.d=nokia.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com;  s=selector1-nokia-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=09/UEi/EgynmOZMwXlXk3+tnc9wat5+sfDjL6SUFJvs=; b=RZ9ozkZxqOyz0DW/aNuiRFqc5v18fT9n2jktbw1Ga9c9zNr7+DDEK+A30Ov0cuiR6BerAW1GEOJGvfEJdSfdxPKoTPDG4TG8diNiLjbw0syd97eul8LcSodJXF/ISgGELH6C4gGYWr/3YK1bJSmfUlGF2G80cL1IpEfhQDL3l2s=
Authentication-Results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=nokia.com;
Received: from PR3PR07MB6572.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:102:63::18) by PR3PR07MB6841.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:102:5e::8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3455.13; Sun, 4 Oct 2020 22:03:17 +0000
Received: from PR3PR07MB6572.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::ddf0:a9a0:46cb:9b94]) by PR3PR07MB6572.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::ddf0:a9a0:46cb:9b94%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3455.017; Sun, 4 Oct 2020 22:03:17 +0000
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
References: <00d001d698d4$f1bca890$d535f9b0$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
Message-ID: <2bd58cc3-4995-8346-cb77-ae0d81fe355d@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 00:03:14 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
In-Reply-To: <00d001d698d4$f1bca890$d535f9b0$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [131.228.2.21]
X-ClientProxiedBy: HE1PR06CA0127.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:7:16::14) To PR3PR07MB6572.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:102:63::18)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Received: from [172.30.2.231] (131.228.2.21) by HE1PR06CA0127.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:7:16::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3433.34 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 4 Oct 2020 22:03:16 +0000
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-HT: Tenant
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: a87059a2-33a0-4d7c-23c2-08d868b14bfe
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: PR3PR07MB6841:
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <PR3PR07MB684106AC1B54D8F01BE2AE398C0F0@PR3PR07MB6841.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:7219;
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 88IjVke0VryvFXoPuFNuDILqY7hFcwrZERdbQmFVpke3jVyJqD3nyTpzGhfLdu7ilLFhQR8b9gkqSPCit8iV+mnb9BXSj2RPvsS2f/XUnEjkl1r1hi05Km4VNa2uNEjbAn0Q3JL5Ru54HYWJ0+gnvhbTGH4ni1p+4HhS0ZwwJtafmnDf483mDgPMhGJLzWMDfVBqxUFnmwAVGCbEnpTgHbQuMfy8Xnzbr6KpVhWw3pGl1X++exi66D9/d50SdXyzjDzMLLMHeobWgGu5RkmGoYeNXq7Sd8zm7l/B6/kiUkG+AMu4EWB7vJvvo/y01yI8b0zm67if7FMuHqtveDdBV1o0l5rUinbO7s3mdoYfjYvEMw4i7iE3eQexVtwiMBaveORBSoKwbI22eIRF9wOO2F4AYIhT3UVMpDY3Pv0f9PCpPxy/hgE6cIj0d4BITSty2FUwGHQU/DoiJ/EBa3cixw==
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:;  IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:PR3PR07MB6572.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE;  SFS:(4636009)(346002)(136003)(376002)(396003)(366004)(39860400002)(316002)(66476007)(66946007)(16576012)(26005)(66556008)(83080400001)(966005)(83380400001)(66574015)(186003)(2906002)(31686004)(16526019)(2616005)(956004)(36756003)(6486002)(86362001)(31696002)(478600001)(53546011)(5660300002)(15650500001)(44832011)(6916009)(8676002)(8936002)(4326008)(52116002)(43740500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; 
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 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
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a87059a2-33a0-4d7c-23c2-08d868b14bfe
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: PR3PR07MB6572.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Oct 2020 22:03:17.0165 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: FIDoqJM8dNXVyhF9/fb/DtKMhWn/fgRlIjTnOcnkzkNui1iELKKnIFR8lyGwhJ4LahW8YhBufpA8tRxnH85mtBkp5PXPtziscNKUS0rhCUE=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PR3PR07MB6841
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/1OCTGZL3ZZAbEbepnP_wV3Fbtss>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2020 22:03:31 -0000

Hi

I should read the docs in my queue instead but ...

       a sub-registry is used when a code point allocated in a registry
       need code points scoped by that or a set of code points.
this is a bit hard to parse. at least s/need/needs/


    The range of each TLV and sub-TLV registry is divided into two
    blocks, one with a range from 0 to 32767 for TLVs and sub-TLVs that
    require a response if not recognized.  The other block has the range
    from 32768 to 65535 for TLVs and sub-TLVs that may be silently
    dropped, stepped over or an error message sent, if not recognized.
this seems like saying exactly the same thing than what the two bullet 
points above (in the draft) say.


In:
    o  If the unrecognized TLV or sub-TLV is from the Experimental Use
       range (37140-37143) or from the FCFS range (31744-32767) a the
       Return Code of 2 ("One or more of the TLVs was not understood")
       will be sent in the echo response.
and in the table of:
3.2.  Common Registration Procedures for TLVs and sub-TLVs

    37140-37143 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned
is the range correct?
shouldn't it be 31740-31743?
BTW, This table doesn't have a number like all other. May be you should 
call it Table 1 (and renumber all other).


Section 2 says:
    o  In the listing of assiged code points the term "Vendor Private
       Use" is changed to "Private Use".
but 3.3.1 says:
    o  In the listing of assignments the term "Vendor Private Use" is
       changed to "First Come First Served (FCFS)".

note there are other differences:
    o  A note "Not to be assigned" is added for the registration
       procedures "Private Use" and "Experimental Use".
    o  A note saying "Not to be assigned" is added for the registration
       procedures "Experimental Use".

    o  In the lists that capture the assignment status, the fields that
       are reserved, i.e.  0 (zero), Private Use and Experimental Use are
       clearly marked as such.
    o  In the list that captures assignment status, the fields that are
       reserved, i.e.  0 (zero) and Experimental Use are clearly marked.
Not sure whether they are intentional.


    Some referenced RFCs use the concept "mandatory TLVs" and "mandatory
    sub-TLVs" to indicate that, if a TLV or sub-TLV of the range 0-16383
    or 16384-31743 in a message is not understood, an error message needs
    to be sent in response.
RFC 8029 talks about mandatory TLVs for a range up to 32767:
    Types less than 32768 (i.e., with the high-order bit equal to 0) are
    mandatory TLVs
BTW you says that clearly in 4.1, so I think this should be consistent here.


You say:
    The Value field contains the TLVs, including sub-TLVs, that were
    not understood, encoded as sub-TLVs.
But 8209 was saying:
    The Value field contains the TLVs that were not understood, encoded
    as sub-TLVs.
This is not only a "removing mandatory" change. you seem to now impose 
that sub-TLVs be sent. Is that the intent?


In Tables 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 20
    | 37140-37144 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
    | 31748-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
are these ranges correct?
shouldn't they be
    | 31740-31743 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
    | 31744-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for TLVs anf sub- |


Nits:
s/This docuemtment/This document/
s/An exasmple/An example/
s/contaimer for regiistries/container for registries/
s/sunregistry/sub-registry/
s/assiged/assigned/
s/range for "RFC Required" range/"RFC Required" range/
s/i.e.  0/i.e., 0/ (2 occurences)
s/registry [IANA-RC] registry/registry [IANA-RC]/
s/sennt/sent/
s/First come, first served/First Come First Served/
s/defintions/definitions/
s/Experimetal Use/Experimental Use/
s/a the/a/
s/srange (64508-64511).  or/range (64508-64511) or/
s/sub- TLVs/sub-TLVs/
s/TLVs an sub/TLVs and sub/
s/TLVs anf sub/TLVs and sub/
s/First Come Frst Served (FCFS)/First Come First Served (FCFS)/
s/Experiemental Use/Experimental Use/
s/The first set are/The first set is/
s/the second set are/the second set is/
s/the range there the/the range of/?
s/The text in those two paragraphs are/The text in those two paragraphs is/
s/resereved/reserved/ (9 occurences)
s/Four code point has/Four code points have/ (3 occurences)
s/Two small sets, 4 code points each, has/Two small sets, 4 code points 
each, have/ (7 occurences)
s/recognised/recognized/


beyond that, I support this document moving forward.

-m

Le 2020-10-02 à 17:59, Adrian Farrel a écrit :
> I know this is not the most exciting document the working group has ever
> produced, but as shepherd I need to see some comments and expressions of
> support.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32
> To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
> Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call :
> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
> 
> Hi MPLS WG,
> 
> As previously noted, I'm the shepherd for this document and I'm running the
> working group last call as agreed by the chairs.
> 
> This email starts a two-week last call on
> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update/
> 
> Please send your opinions to the mailing list before October 9th.
> 
> While yes/no opinions are not without value, it is far more helpful if you
> can indicate whether you have read the latest version of the draft, and what
> the reasons are for your opinions.
> 
> Of course, all of your review comments will be helpful in improving the
> document.
> 
> Best,
> Adrian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 


From nobody Mon Oct  5 07:38:02 2020
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0A33A0B23; Mon,  5 Oct 2020 07:37:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.894
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zPtvY7K4j6SG; Mon,  5 Oct 2020 07:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 677FB3A0B2C; Mon,  5 Oct 2020 07:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 095Ebr9A007565; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 15:37:53 +0100
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472752203D; Mon,  5 Oct 2020 15:37:53 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31D9422044; Mon,  5 Oct 2020 15:37:53 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([213.205.192.60]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 095Eboxi012590 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Oct 2020 15:37:51 +0100
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Andrew G. Malis'" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Cc: "'mpls'" <mpls@ietf.org>, <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org>
References: <00d001d698d4$f1bca890$d535f9b0$@olddog.co.uk> <CAA=duU2U7qK1FK0HoVTJqfoyoeCnuXWJ0+2xu5XjJJtQjWpXtA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU2U7qK1FK0HoVTJqfoyoeCnuXWJ0+2xu5XjJJtQjWpXtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 15:37:49 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <026001d69b25$1a364db0$4ea2e910$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0261_01D69B2D.7BFB2AE0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AQIopY8CQdoe9fnKhGf+rPScRcluxQIflT4OqNQCRtA=
X-Originating-IP: 213.205.192.60
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25706.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--24.864-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--24.864-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25706.007
X-TMASE-Result: 10--24.863800-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: HLMPCFyIyBNfsB4HYR80Zh3Pziq4eLUfaMmm586o4gBIXJo+eGm+FBI0 ePrNo/nEXbdRoVo097zvGDor/GIRYFYv4BqgLuJUcI7vRACwF0IZskwWqoib3I4lLuJITAnA5SS t+JCedISF35Y+5Kr9cdRhM/66LMExfWxSklBAaGnxkn8eupvmjBfbPFE2GHrVg8vHe9ji82JjmY ucG05PD5oy6+bRaYkXsJVxkt9B663/ORgke/hrYfGvJzY37p+a+D+zbdY8EilYbPLopoBzQjKaP QElmQY4l+QcU0TYMReoEqkKu0SlDWFSCbxk53PfQjh5L2ZXj+z4h+uI7dxXxLu1Sf94ro4peZjq A2yQI6equR4bEQmavwZwNnCZFle+mSuhkyegN5+8coKUcaOOvVG+BHSGRsbgwfH2XZhguhCSN5t 8Lx0BlgBxqjUik25MlETKOSy0ENQUuHdpoxh1CU4eFUkH5CFcBXJ6j2Ez1IdDruIX2XuqxO//vb MLiEkVWFQNk4+HCoiv8TAvJrvuV7QJ4oUF56vogRTWSf0X8xmOz/LLJUcaHsmqrXFLFjsW6aX8T YIrj1uFZCZln65Hjpt6E4YKOIuodhxZTImqKvlFH6oTiImwh13HHpZF/7mwJwUz1ePFvP9R18Qp zXStTvkHxcbJXlk3KoWa7+H+3DvuTQq+tUM08C+PrAd8gbHJnTcLR8+TzEppPI6NmimM1AxP6uF bRm9qjaOMlOGY7eH/voIzhn8wZuVHGbcDbAq6FEUknJ/kEl5ZDL1gLmoa/OYq7Exe0AIoz7345D 1T/l/fd+P6wwCt84RtqopBKUBlYSqodBHDcgTO71MtW7o7rGAqb6R34mnr8WfbBAjtCIlKq7VPC geZRQ==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/ADEx1D7wGACMIZ9GtlsQza5IBF4>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 14:37:59 -0000

This is a multipart message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0261_01D69B2D.7BFB2AE0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks Andy,

=20

That looks like a good point: I=E2=80=99m sure the authors will work on =
it.

=20

Adrian

=20

From: Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com>=20
Sent: 03 October 2020 14:14
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Cc: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>; =
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last =
Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]

=20

Adrian,

=20

I just looked through the draft and support its publication. That said, =
it would be nice if section 1 included a bit more motivation - what were =
the issues with the current states of RFCs 8029 and 8611 (besides =
needing to be "more precise"?) and what would be the consequences of =
leaving things as they were.

=20

Cheers,

Andy

=20

On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 11:59 AM Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk =
<mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk> > wrote:

I know this is not the most exciting document the working group has ever
produced, but as shepherd I need to see some comments and expressions of
support.

Thanks,
Adrian
-----Original Message-----
From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org> > On =
Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32
To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org> >
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org =
<mailto:draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org>=20
Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call :
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04

Hi MPLS WG,

As previously noted, I'm the shepherd for this document and I'm running =
the
working group last call as agreed by the chairs.

This email starts a two-week last call on
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-upda=
te/

Please send your opinions to the mailing list before October 9th.

While yes/no opinions are not without value, it is far more helpful if =
you
can indicate whether you have read the latest version of the draft, and =
what
the reasons are for your opinions.

Of course, all of your review comments will be helpful in improving the
document.

Best,
Adrian

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>=20
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>=20
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls


------=_NextPart_000_0261_01D69B2D.7BFB2AE0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" =
xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" =
xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8"><meta =
name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 15 (filtered =
medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
	{font-family:"Cambria Math";
	panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Calibri;
	panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{margin:0cm;
	font-size:11.0pt;
	font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	color:blue;
	text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle18
	{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
	font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
	color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
	{mso-style-type:export-only;
	font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
	mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
@page WordSection1
	{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
	margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
	{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit">
<o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=3DEN-GB link=3Dblue =
vlink=3Dpurple><div class=3DWordSection1><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
style=3D'mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Thanks =
Andy,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
style=3D'mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>That looks =
like a good point: I=E2=80=99m sure the authors will work on =
it.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
style=3D'mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><span =
style=3D'mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Adrian<o:p></o:p></span></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><span =
style=3D'mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><div =
style=3D'border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm =
0cm 0cm'><p class=3DMsoNormal><b><span =
lang=3DEN-US>From:</span></b><span lang=3DEN-US> Andrew G. Malis =
&lt;agmalis@gmail.com&gt; <br><b>Sent:</b> 03 October 2020 =
14:14<br><b>To:</b> Adrian Farrel =
&lt;adrian@olddog.co.uk&gt;<br><b>Cc:</b> mpls &lt;mpls@ietf.org&gt;; =
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org<br><b>Subject:</b> =
Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : =
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]<o:p></o:p></span></p></div=
><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><div><p =
class=3DMsoNormal>Adrian,<o:p></o:p></p><div><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p></div><div><p class=3DMsoNormal>I =
just looked through the draft and support its publication. That said, it =
would be nice if section 1 included a bit more motivation - what were =
the issues with the current states of RFCs 8029 and 8611 (besides =
needing to be &quot;more precise&quot;?) and what would be the =
consequences of leaving things as they were.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p></div><div><p =
class=3DMsoNormal>Cheers,<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p =
class=3DMsoNormal>Andy<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><div><div><p class=3DMsoNormal>On =
Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 11:59 AM Adrian Farrel &lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk">adrian@olddog.co.uk</a>&gt; =
wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote =
style=3D'border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm =
6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm'><p class=3DMsoNormal>I know =
this is not the most exciting document the working group has =
ever<br>produced, but as shepherd I need to see some comments and =
expressions of<br>support.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Adrian<br>-----Original =
Message-----<br>From: mpls &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org" =
target=3D"_blank">mpls-bounces@ietf.org</a>&gt; On Behalf Of Adrian =
Farrel<br>Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32<br>To: 'mpls' &lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:mpls@ietf.org" =
target=3D"_blank">mpls@ietf.org</a>&gt;<br>Cc: <a =
href=3D"mailto:draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org" =
target=3D"_blank">draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org</a>=
<br>Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call =
:<br>draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04<br><br>Hi MPLS =
WG,<br><br>As previously noted, I'm the shepherd for this document and =
I'm running the<br>working group last call as agreed by the =
chairs.<br><br>This email starts a two-week last call =
on<br>draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04<br><a =
href=3D"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registr=
ies-update/" =
target=3D"_blank">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-pi=
ng-registries-update/</a><br><br>Please send your opinions to the =
mailing list before October 9th.<br><br>While yes/no opinions are not =
without value, it is far more helpful if you<br>can indicate whether you =
have read the latest version of the draft, and what<br>the reasons are =
for your opinions.<br><br>Of course, all of your review comments will be =
helpful in improving =
the<br>document.<br><br>Best,<br>Adrian<br><br>__________________________=
_____________________<br>mpls mailing list<br><a =
href=3D"mailto:mpls@ietf.org" target=3D"_blank">mpls@ietf.org</a><br><a =
href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls" =
target=3D"_blank">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls</a><br><br>_=
______________________________________________<br>mpls mailing =
list<br><a href=3D"mailto:mpls@ietf.org" =
target=3D"_blank">mpls@ietf.org</a><br><a =
href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls" =
target=3D"_blank">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls</a><o:p></o:=
p></p></blockquote></div></div></body></html>
------=_NextPart_000_0261_01D69B2D.7BFB2AE0--


From nobody Mon Oct  5 07:38:07 2020
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF84C3A0B23; Mon,  5 Oct 2020 07:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mp6VYGofljsZ; Mon,  5 Oct 2020 07:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5E7C3A0B2D; Mon,  5 Oct 2020 07:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 095Ebssb007595; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 15:37:54 +0100
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE002203B; Mon,  5 Oct 2020 15:37:54 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1ABD2203C; Mon,  5 Oct 2020 15:37:54 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([213.205.192.60]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 095Eboxj012590 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Oct 2020 15:37:53 +0100
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Martin Vigoureux'" <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, "'mpls'" <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org>
References: <00d001d698d4$f1bca890$d535f9b0$@olddog.co.uk> <2bd58cc3-4995-8346-cb77-ae0d81fe355d@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <2bd58cc3-4995-8346-cb77-ae0d81fe355d@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 15:37:49 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <026501d69b25$1b6c35a0$5244a0e0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AQIopY8CQdoe9fnKhGf+rPScRcluxQIq8AVeqNOnE0A=
X-Originating-IP: 213.205.192.60
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25706.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--26.780-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--26.780-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25706.007
X-TMASE-Result: 10--26.780300-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: IeZYkn8zfFpfsB4HYR80Zh3Pziq4eLUfaMmm586o4gCEzN6u0/vUVyZK RIFpXA+BKgu3wA/rn06oEqkKu0SlDfYJVFK3+7e9E9L0HNvKzVGlAfiiC1VA/atNdpFrZXd8WKo DKTsuRuSMrjTLwXAjolTcsSRvflNNQSWnAG0egjGgEgF6J/LtvAX/tYZf6r/w31GU/N5W5BB7Mo GOLT7cXpGcvIlvEx3zc3KrQbBqeDfkEToQJUIf8zMvozJIQnRWas1wAJHsfyJQ5Z2rmLs/uAnAL CneuQeF2nPTJ66uXI8UsZ6zwnK8ZNxzjdVS8wPAUrViw6AaT1HAqRukGkkpQoTa63gQe8yZqjqF xcD2zqQjJSHdeMJwWAAFzw1smOZeqW+NTJXdhQpgqbvjZaUg3geCHewokHM/nfhwoL2rlR4Y8df j5o9RIkTzIN6Psm0WhYtNyho9wwtJH11OOVB0ya78ETDb69mDKmiyrJHNh3K2a8Gr1LCHzX8959 tRYfUf87iqmK5tOGzT0HqIsqMzg7mvMSppeWbNOJJP0pnMGEXLRD51bz5RZG1RcrL9l9kZpUj6I FzjrtJ60FCjuld9b0PO49DzB6P26vQUV4NWGLP40JAO63QrhVlszaF8fhheyIsEtBD7SqAEPZ/F Ntxg3wI72Y570KtpSiIDtsa93LXxPdkZBNfrSeLbvXwDQz25lFGUu7DBzhgbVUVEY6U/rwY1yj5 dODZPVCsMlzW0RMbkFpC4bGxef0KPluOEKT3/KO2+bS8WGa089zBT8EOluatkcxxU6EVI7vwkzz 88kq3rw2rmN+CDC8uT6pyURQPh5UcZtwNsCrqDGx/OQ1GV8v1vTGBiuZrtU2Qzq85WfnB0HSe13 1POnuJGF26G8SWy5yM0c1ktj9M=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/BXwxtsuu69qUdkzkIcyWdb3Pj34>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 14:38:02 -0000

Thanks Martin,

I'm sure the authors will jump on these.

Nice catch of the transposed digits!

Best,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>=20
Sent: 04 October 2020 23:03
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk; 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last =
Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]

Hi

I should read the docs in my queue instead but ...

       a sub-registry is used when a code point allocated in a registry
       need code points scoped by that or a set of code points.
this is a bit hard to parse. at least s/need/needs/


    The range of each TLV and sub-TLV registry is divided into two
    blocks, one with a range from 0 to 32767 for TLVs and sub-TLVs that
    require a response if not recognized.  The other block has the range
    from 32768 to 65535 for TLVs and sub-TLVs that may be silently
    dropped, stepped over or an error message sent, if not recognized.
this seems like saying exactly the same thing than what the two bullet=20
points above (in the draft) say.


In:
    o  If the unrecognized TLV or sub-TLV is from the Experimental Use
       range (37140-37143) or from the FCFS range (31744-32767) a the
       Return Code of 2 ("One or more of the TLVs was not understood")
       will be sent in the echo response.
and in the table of:
3.2.  Common Registration Procedures for TLVs and sub-TLVs

    37140-37143 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned
is the range correct?
shouldn't it be 31740-31743?
BTW, This table doesn't have a number like all other. May be you should=20
call it Table 1 (and renumber all other).


Section 2 says:
    o  In the listing of assiged code points the term "Vendor Private
       Use" is changed to "Private Use".
but 3.3.1 says:
    o  In the listing of assignments the term "Vendor Private Use" is
       changed to "First Come First Served (FCFS)".

note there are other differences:
    o  A note "Not to be assigned" is added for the registration
       procedures "Private Use" and "Experimental Use".
    o  A note saying "Not to be assigned" is added for the registration
       procedures "Experimental Use".

    o  In the lists that capture the assignment status, the fields that
       are reserved, i.e.  0 (zero), Private Use and Experimental Use =
are
       clearly marked as such.
    o  In the list that captures assignment status, the fields that are
       reserved, i.e.  0 (zero) and Experimental Use are clearly marked.
Not sure whether they are intentional.


    Some referenced RFCs use the concept "mandatory TLVs" and "mandatory
    sub-TLVs" to indicate that, if a TLV or sub-TLV of the range 0-16383
    or 16384-31743 in a message is not understood, an error message =
needs
    to be sent in response.
RFC 8029 talks about mandatory TLVs for a range up to 32767:
    Types less than 32768 (i.e., with the high-order bit equal to 0) are
    mandatory TLVs
BTW you says that clearly in 4.1, so I think this should be consistent =
here.


You say:
    The Value field contains the TLVs, including sub-TLVs, that were
    not understood, encoded as sub-TLVs.
But 8209 was saying:
    The Value field contains the TLVs that were not understood, encoded
    as sub-TLVs.
This is not only a "removing mandatory" change. you seem to now impose=20
that sub-TLVs be sent. Is that the intent?


In Tables 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 20
    | 37140-37144 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    =
|
    | 31748-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that =
|
are these ranges correct?
shouldn't they be
    | 31740-31743 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    =
|
    | 31744-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for TLVs anf sub- =
|


Nits:
s/This docuemtment/This document/
s/An exasmple/An example/
s/contaimer for regiistries/container for registries/
s/sunregistry/sub-registry/
s/assiged/assigned/
s/range for "RFC Required" range/"RFC Required" range/
s/i.e.  0/i.e., 0/ (2 occurences)
s/registry [IANA-RC] registry/registry [IANA-RC]/
s/sennt/sent/
s/First come, first served/First Come First Served/
s/defintions/definitions/
s/Experimetal Use/Experimental Use/
s/a the/a/
s/srange (64508-64511).  or/range (64508-64511) or/
s/sub- TLVs/sub-TLVs/
s/TLVs an sub/TLVs and sub/
s/TLVs anf sub/TLVs and sub/
s/First Come Frst Served (FCFS)/First Come First Served (FCFS)/
s/Experiemental Use/Experimental Use/
s/The first set are/The first set is/
s/the second set are/the second set is/
s/the range there the/the range of/?
s/The text in those two paragraphs are/The text in those two paragraphs =
is/
s/resereved/reserved/ (9 occurences)
s/Four code point has/Four code points have/ (3 occurences)
s/Two small sets, 4 code points each, has/Two small sets, 4 code points=20
each, have/ (7 occurences)
s/recognised/recognized/


beyond that, I support this document moving forward.

-m

Le 2020-10-02 =C3=A0 17:59, Adrian Farrel a =C3=A9crit :
> I know this is not the most exciting document the working group has =
ever
> produced, but as shepherd I need to see some comments and expressions =
of
> support.
>=20
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32
> To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
> Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call :
> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
>=20
> Hi MPLS WG,
>=20
> As previously noted, I'm the shepherd for this document and I'm =
running the
> working group last call as agreed by the chairs.
>=20
> This email starts a two-week last call on
> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
> =
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-upda=
te/
>=20
> Please send your opinions to the mailing list before October 9th.
>=20
> While yes/no opinions are not without value, it is far more helpful if =
you
> can indicate whether you have read the latest version of the draft, =
and what
> the reasons are for your opinions.
>=20
> Of course, all of your review comments will be helpful in improving =
the
> document.
>=20
> Best,
> Adrian
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>=20


From nobody Mon Oct  5 08:47:16 2020
Return-Path: <statements@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60283A0489; Mon,  5 Oct 2020 08:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Liaison Statement Management Tool <statements@ietf.org>
To: "Nicolai Leymann" <n.leymann@telekom.de>, "Julien Meuric" <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "Fatai Zhang" <zhangfatai@huawei.com>, "Lou Berger" <lberger@labn.net>, "Tarek Saad" <tsaad.net@gmail.com>, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu>, "Stewart Bryant" <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, "Daniele Ceccarelli" <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, "Andy Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>, "Vishnu Pavan Beeram" <vbeeram@juniper.net>, "Dhruv Dhody" <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
Cc: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, Nicolai Leymann <n.leymann@telekom.de>, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, Scott Mansfield <Scott.Mansfield@Ericsson.com>, Deborah Brungard <db3546@att.com>, Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, John Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling Discussion List <teas@ietf.org>, itu-t-liaison@iab.org, Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>, Path Computation Element Discussion List <pce@ietf.org>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>, Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services Discussion List <pals@ietf.org>, Vishnu Beeram <vbeeram@juniper.net>, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, hiroshi.ota@itu.int, Common Control and Measurement Plane Discussion List <ccamp@ietf.org>, Andy Malis <agmalis@gmail.com>, Multiprotocol Label Switching Discussion List <mpls@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.19.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <160191261480.31444.6989454918211883690@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 08:43:34 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/kW55DBVFh0Dh8x0tjjH8c3ivjhk>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 08:47:14 -0700
Subject: [mpls] New Liaison Statement, "LS on OTNT Standardization Work Plan Issue 28"
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 15:43:35 -0000

Title: LS on OTNT Standardization Work Plan Issue 28
Submission Date: 2020-10-05
URL of the IETF Web page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1698/
Please reply by 2021-05-01
From: Hiroshi Ota <hiroshi.ota@itu.int>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>,Nicolai Leymann <n.leymann@telekom.de>,Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>,Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vbeeram@juniper.net>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>,Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>,Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>,Andy Malis <agmalis@gmail.com>,Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>,Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>,Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
Cc: John Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>,Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>,Multiprotocol Label Switching Discussion List <mpls@ietf.org>,Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>,Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>,Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>,Vishnu Beeram <vbeeram@juniper.net>,Deborah Brungard <db3546@att.com>,Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>,Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>,Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>,Andy Malis <agmalis@gmail.com>,Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services Discussion List <pals@ietf.org>,Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>,Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>,Nicolai Leymann <n.leymann@telekom.de>,Scott Mansfield <Scott.Mansfield@Ericsson.com>,Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling Discussion List <teas@ietf.org>,Path Computation Element Discussion List <pce@ietf.org>,itu-t-liaison@iab.org,Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>,Common Control and Measurement Plane Discussion List <ccamp@ietf.org>
Response Contacts: hiroshi.ota@itu.int
Technical Contacts: 
Purpose: For action

Body: Attached is Issue 28 of the OTNT SWP, the latest version updated by the SG15 during a plenary meeting in September 2020.
We would appreciate updates to the material relevant to your SDO.

Attachment: Optical Transport Networks & Technologies Standardization Work Plan Issue 28, September 2020
Attachments:

    SG15-LS268-att-OTN-issue28
    https://www.ietf.org/lib/dt/documents/LIAISON/liaison-2020-10-05-itu-t-sg-15-mpls-ccamp-pce-pals-teas-ls-on-otnt-standardization-work-plan-issue-28-attachment-1.pdf

    SG15-LS268
    https://www.ietf.org/lib/dt/documents/LIAISON/liaison-2020-10-05-itu-t-sg-15-mpls-ccamp-pce-pals-teas-ls-on-otnt-standardization-work-plan-issue-28-attachment-2.pdf



From nobody Mon Oct  5 08:53:23 2020
Return-Path: <statements@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69D23A1094; Mon,  5 Oct 2020 08:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Liaison Statement Management Tool <statements@ietf.org>
To: "Nicolai Leymann" <n.leymann@telekom.de>, "Tarek Saad" <tsaad.net@gmail.com>, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu>
Cc: itu-t-liaison@iab.org, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, Scott Mansfield <Scott.Mansfield@Ericsson.com>, Multiprotocol Label Switching Discussion List <mpls@ietf.org>, Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>, Nicolai Leymann <n.leymann@telekom.de>, hiroshi.ota@itu.int, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, John Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, Deborah Brungard <db3546@att.com>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.19.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <160191319430.2100.6930853417411571511@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 08:53:14 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/LPXsNlhx5Y_L3dRtpu6SHkoRxRA>
Subject: [mpls] New Liaison Statement, "Updates to MPLS-TP Recommendations"
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 15:53:22 -0000

Title: Updates to MPLS-TP Recommendations
Submission Date: 2020-10-05
URL of the IETF Web page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1700/

From: Hiroshi Ota <hiroshi.ota@itu.int>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>,Nicolai Leymann <n.leymann@telekom.de>,Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
Cc: Multiprotocol Label Switching Discussion List <mpls@ietf.org>,Deborah Brungard <db3546@att.com>,Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>,Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>,Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>,Nicolai Leymann <n.leymann@telekom.de>,Scott Mansfield <Scott.Mansfield@Ericsson.com>,John Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>,Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>,itu-t-liaison@iab.org
Response Contacts: hiroshi.ota@itu.int
Technical Contacts: 
Purpose: For information

Body: ITU-T SG15 wishes to inform the IETF MPLS WG that at the September 2020 plenary meeting of SG15 has initiated the approval process for the following documents related to MPLS:

• Revised Recommendation ITU-T G.8151 Management aspects of the MPLS-TP network element
• New Recommendation ITU-T G.8152.1 MPLS-TP NE OAM Information Model & Data Model
• New Recommendation ITU-T G.8152.2 MPLS-TP NE Resilience Information Model & Data Model
• Revised Recommendation ITU-T G.8112 "Interfaces for the MPLS transport profile layer network"
• Amendment 1 of Recommendation ITU-T G.8110.1 “Architecture of the Multi-Protocol Label Switching transport profile layer network”

The next meeting of ITU-T SG15 is 22 June – 2 July 2021

Attachments: TD578R1/P; TD582R1/P; TD583R1/P; TD592R1/P; TD591R1/P
Attachments:

    T17-SG15-200907-TD-PLEN-0592!R1!MSW-E
    https://www.ietf.org/lib/dt/documents/LIAISON/liaison-2020-10-05-itu-t-sg-15-mpls-updates-to-mpls-tp-recommendations-attachment-1.pdf

    T17-SG15-200907-TD-PLEN-0591!R1!MSW-E
    https://www.ietf.org/lib/dt/documents/LIAISON/liaison-2020-10-05-itu-t-sg-15-mpls-updates-to-mpls-tp-recommendations-attachment-2.pdf

    T17-SG15-200907-TD-PLEN-0583!R1!MSW-E
    https://www.ietf.org/lib/dt/documents/LIAISON/liaison-2020-10-05-itu-t-sg-15-mpls-updates-to-mpls-tp-recommendations-attachment-3.pdf

    T17-SG15-200907-TD-PLEN-0582!R1!MSW-E
    https://www.ietf.org/lib/dt/documents/LIAISON/liaison-2020-10-05-itu-t-sg-15-mpls-updates-to-mpls-tp-recommendations-attachment-4.pdf

    T17-SG15-200907-TD-PLEN-0578!R1!MSW-E
    https://www.ietf.org/lib/dt/documents/LIAISON/liaison-2020-10-05-itu-t-sg-15-mpls-updates-to-mpls-tp-recommendations-attachment-5.pdf

    SG15-LS288
    https://www.ietf.org/lib/dt/documents/LIAISON/liaison-2020-10-05-itu-t-sg-15-mpls-updates-to-mpls-tp-recommendations-attachment-6.pdf



From nobody Mon Oct  5 09:48:02 2020
Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D843A0E19; Mon,  5 Oct 2020 09:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gzf7ykiAyzKz; Mon,  5 Oct 2020 09:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR05-DB8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-db8eur05on2111.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.20.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 317843A0844; Mon,  5 Oct 2020 09:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=dvtow5Zw9RpkGsKII4bUv+Lq7xoMrwGw7pAv2cTrBlzSoMe5h+tV5XvvWX2srTFJL+JXm4ns6qq+RbOYV018MjNK9bv4+oMblEVNkZWGKBUeSDV8zuOC3bOKxc/a/jDX34Jcoxm/Wvg3teS7kI5JCHbOlkejeG6h0cxfUFxFWWbCp4hGyHKRXdiYfAmIdjERNildjONvKOHnrxqhoTsPuF4/yc9ggRkrxoZJ5AnXu1MK+7bL2HkpUxENda/bKhGuBKJjsrrTEgDD+1JngTibKtzuHTYf4FD3FdVZQ+yeNuWCj2mMEl3qqTUSgThT8M2uOSXfDV4Qbo1BvJM/dO6Vzg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;  s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=8Bv/DAQ4BfIZUpvGgVrYjBfcQRoFexs3vTNa89h2tsQ=; b=eyZUchmIlTbigt1O0YTNL+SDuc3ZJAOHsl+kIU1FIeYaNHtw2lf1X2BsyAM8esRx3Fd5rpCc7v4ujwUinAgMbzHNJ9zdC9mzq6NzRKmk1GMHTUR+fPTvhFb7sI1cVssCjfddDEAOJvYtoS85JErhXbUOFFoMwvR8kDpo/N+zaVNigHYdQ2jGXLkvDk6z3mUOLnkmSyyJ9TVrZV1Na//9PV/7rTbC2Uptulc0l1647asWbwrqRENSzTGVyCcAMAa6fPyK34O0ITF0AJT3MxINMxQ+0xFupPOurEFXpLlJjZdE0CWWix7TE0hyyOn4nYDY71gu7dTXQt0PYSTOsdDjTA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=btconnect.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=btconnect.com; dkim=pass header.d=btconnect.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-btconnect-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=8Bv/DAQ4BfIZUpvGgVrYjBfcQRoFexs3vTNa89h2tsQ=; b=Umd86Dn/u5T5uxDwAx7KqK8io32XmoF1PSYaVui+A9QQtuEVTEKeA/jYFoa+/Y32f0CSbJpePmoIxk7J4kU+IyoINVWojp6JzH7rZefCEgqr7zzP1H1jkWmypPSSte9S9q0+Y9jJqht4yzES6Dd9dkIar1EBBoZ4OidL+FkHV4o=
Received: from AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:134::11) by AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:134::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3455.17; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 16:47:55 +0000
Received: from AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::ad44:1086:3767:a804]) by AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::ad44:1086:3767:a804%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3455.020; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 16:47:55 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>, "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
CC: "draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
Thread-Index: AdaY1LuALWlBbybiQBmQ3luSJJ9RCACXpovU
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 16:47:55 +0000
Message-ID: <AM7PR07MB624861C8609DACDCF5A3B110A00C0@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <00d001d698d4$f1bca890$d535f9b0$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <00d001d698d4$f1bca890$d535f9b0$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=btconnect.com;
x-originating-ip: [86.146.121.140]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 200603b5-8b9a-4ca6-9f22-08d8694e68a5
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM7PR07MB6248:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM7PR07MB62485DB1873722C266313410A00C0@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7219;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Bc4RA8wHtIpW44H75Al9tlF9p6p5qLwBCojK7zZDbpxZ8Tpbbe7uBce3oxuPDaOMwIy0EsOCQIOfMhELS8vRwKiP1UN2CS/CexcgaZJgCfDGhwPtEz2aabhQzeDV6pq+9QN2cS+j4zCza8VHw27nLIXt9DmAzP6ZkM2qmJcXryajv/SA+DRgpa/DBoZL4dvf9wNc0dQcEQyQi3hEH2bAi1sCDDTzG1O7cmmlQ7/upEQr0KCaUenS1I9KyefxqCEQ8ENaGwE8w61yXXFeoiIDHe7C9dpcplQrZuopi4KLylUKBupf+2t7X6aXFkMzh7VTZaWL8ThmZpa5Ybu5ljWcGoje3aTijkCDM1Denwwoo5enDtfOa++h1YopWweKSZm8bnERzQZIVezFMsZZr1buRw==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:;  IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE;  SFS:(376002)(346002)(366004)(136003)(396003)(39860400002)(316002)(8936002)(55016002)(9686003)(8676002)(53546011)(6506007)(7696005)(4326008)(966005)(478600001)(15650500001)(26005)(186003)(64756008)(66446008)(52536014)(2906002)(5660300002)(83080400001)(76116006)(86362001)(66556008)(66476007)(66946007)(33656002)(71200400001)(83380400001)(110136005)(91956017); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; 
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 200603b5-8b9a-4ca6-9f22-08d8694e68a5
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Oct 2020 16:47:55.6288 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 49P8NynO//Ony6TDmiJ97GSAsgs05X8ceZLkGrUQxFbuxcBI0lcLlFOicxkM07iaUcs/D5AjG/Hh/TlVzAFqAQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM7PR07MB6248
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/wt5XTJDZPOL4wR5qlHZxcWGVJoE>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 16:48:01 -0000

From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddo=
g.co.uk>=0A=
Sent: 02 October 2020 16:59=0A=
=0A=
I know this is not the most exciting document the working group has ever=0A=
produced, but as shepherd I need to see some comments and expressions of=0A=
support.=0A=
=0A=
<tp>=0A=
Overcome  by the enormity of the task, complicated because of the sheer lev=
el of detail.  The spelling is a bit unusual but that can wait.=0A=
=0A=
What strikes me most is that RFC8126 is an Informative Reference.  Sort of =
fits, since that RFC clarifies the terminology that should be used, and thi=
s I-D does not use it:-(  It defines Groups and Registries and the Group he=
re is Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture which does not get a menti=
on which I think an omission. Registries come next as in Message Types, Rep=
ly Modes and Return Codes, and TLVs so I think that s.1.2 should reference =
 RFC8126 Normatively and use these exemplars.  The only thing that s.1.2 ne=
eds to clarify is the Sub-TLV which is the term in use at present on the we=
bsite but that RFC does not use the term sub-registry so whether or not it =
is worth defining I find debatable.  I would be inclined to avoid 'subregis=
try' entirely but suggest contacting IANA to ask what term they would like =
to see for the Sub-TLVs definitions.   I do think it wrong for this I-D to =
refer to 'registry for subTLVs' because the registry is 'TLVs'!=0A=
=0A=
A more complex point is that once this I-D has been actioned, the IANA Regi=
stries will have been updated and it will be difficult, impossible may be, =
to make sense of this I-D and what it has done because what is there now, w=
hat it is updating, will be difficult or impossible to establish.  The I-D =
should contain a picture of how the registries are now, an Appendix would s=
eem suitable, taken from the current IANA definitions, the text that appear=
s on the screen at present.=0A=
=0A=
When reviewing this I-D, I find myself repeatedly referring to the website =
so having that as text in the I-D would make reviewing easier for me.  They=
 are available as CSV and the last time this topic got reviewed I downloade=
d them all.=0A=
=0A=
Tom Petch=0A=
=0A=
Thanks,=0A=
Adrian=0A=
-----Original Message-----=0A=
From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel=0A=
Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32=0A=
To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>=0A=
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org=0A=
Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call :=0A=
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04=0A=
=0A=
Hi MPLS WG,=0A=
=0A=
As previously noted, I'm the shepherd for this document and I'm running the=
=0A=
working group last call as agreed by the chairs.=0A=
=0A=
This email starts a two-week last call on=0A=
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04=0A=
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update=
/=0A=
=0A=
Please send your opinions to the mailing list before October 9th.=0A=
=0A=
While yes/no opinions are not without value, it is far more helpful if you=
=0A=
can indicate whether you have read the latest version of the draft, and wha=
t=0A=
the reasons are for your opinions.=0A=
=0A=
Of course, all of your review comments will be helpful in improving the=0A=
document.=0A=
=0A=
Best,=0A=
Adrian=0A=
=0A=
_______________________________________________=0A=
mpls mailing list=0A=
mpls@ietf.org=0A=
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls=0A=
=0A=
_______________________________________________=0A=
mpls mailing list=0A=
mpls@ietf.org=0A=
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls=0A=


From nobody Tue Oct  6 03:52:11 2020
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEFD3A0E9E; Tue,  6 Oct 2020 03:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.11
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.213, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u_m6QKpdNg8e; Tue,  6 Oct 2020 03:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 678DE3A13D1; Tue,  6 Oct 2020 03:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (unknown [124.104.122.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3A93321AE7; Tue,  6 Oct 2020 12:52:03 +0200 (CEST)
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, "'Andrew G. Malis'" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Cc: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
References: <00d001d698d4$f1bca890$d535f9b0$@olddog.co.uk> <CAA=duU2U7qK1FK0HoVTJqfoyoeCnuXWJ0+2xu5XjJJtQjWpXtA@mail.gmail.com> <026001d69b25$1a364db0$4ea2e910$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <a24a2432-618e-414b-b5ef-ec557b81945c@pi.nu>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 18:52:00 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <026001d69b25$1a364db0$4ea2e910$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/GoOQJdFLqJegWijIHsEbSa9-sbw>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 10:52:10 -0000

Andy and Adrian,

Tnx! I will start to prepare version -05.

Inline plz.


On 05/10/2020 22:37, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Thanks Andy,
> 
> That looks like a good point: I’m sure the authors will work on it.
> 
> Adrian
> 
> *From:*Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* 03 October 2020 14:14
> *To:* Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
> *Cc:* mpls <mpls@ietf.org>; 
> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last 
> Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
> 
> Adrian,
> 
> I just looked through the draft and support its publication. That said, 
> it would be nice if section 1 included a bit more motivation - what were 
> the issues with the current states of RFCs 8029 and 8611 (besides 
> needing to be "more precise"?) and what would be the consequences of 
> leaving things as they were.

Thee have been a few attempt to add something like that, but comments 
have been to drop the paragraph. Since rather that telling why we are 
doing this, I talked about past mistakes.

I know quite well where this started, there was a misconception that 
assigning code points from experimental RFCs would give you experimental 
code points,

Registration procedure

+---------------------------+------------------------------+
|Specification required     | Experimental RFC required    |
+---------------------------+------------------------------+

and the registration producers as it was documented made it impossible 
to assign a code point to allocate code point t´from this range from a 
Standard Tracks RFC.



Can you help and at least give me an handle (1-2 sentences) that I can 
work with?

/Loa
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Andy
> 
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 11:59 AM Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk 
> <mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk>> wrote:
> 
>     I know this is not the most exciting document the working group has ever
>     produced, but as shepherd I need to see some comments and expressions of
>     support.
> 
>     Thanks,
>     Adrian
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org>> On
>     Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
>     Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32
>     To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>>
>     Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
>     <mailto:draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org>
>     Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call :
>     draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
> 
>     Hi MPLS WG,
> 
>     As previously noted, I'm the shepherd for this document and I'm
>     running the
>     working group last call as agreed by the chairs.
> 
>     This email starts a two-week last call on
>     draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update/
> 
>     Please send your opinions to the mailing list before October 9th.
> 
>     While yes/no opinions are not without value, it is far more helpful
>     if you
>     can indicate whether you have read the latest version of the draft,
>     and what
>     the reasons are for your opinions.
> 
>     Of course, all of your review comments will be helpful in improving the
>     document.
> 
>     Best,
>     Adrian
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     mpls mailing list
>     mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     mpls mailing list
>     mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 

-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64


From nobody Wed Oct  7 03:59:44 2020
Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3983A3A0925; Wed,  7 Oct 2020 03:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ILFgcW-qbRrP; Wed,  7 Oct 2020 03:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR03-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr30122.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.3.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0F983A09CF; Wed,  7 Oct 2020 03:59:40 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Z5i4Rjd4R/ZweUb13aENxD1xidPKNwc2xu0FPok4RCjGDxYndgiJsn9tNA67mGQNEJx8vX3DLXp1bWW8djsPQNlu4ki0b6Z56OyJgc1SAMdoxPcvaqlEo7nRMTYVOx7E3bYdq6DNZCYnjg+39bKKqyt2r0+KpOTQFaKsExrURHXNt+emKauoBETX7fk4pE9IDeGoI8uRBO/s9XJHWY9WIXAphhQ/QK1jTXue/yoAvom+vnr9JLWCskO/qReQwjDyS05kJ/UVj+DPs+OTlf+Spc3xlPWXK4tbvs/VE+66/D1tmiVC0vUzjRGlJdix9SY0ND2akdu91VuHLpf0BhiLqA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;  s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=SCAGY+o1Nt1x9PpLdGt8JUVGbLTM9MN/hnghuVdbsFs=; b=XTAadtDBuXGm92cSwhdaGXgqBcygLHgghX4SOFj0knCSWvrfN/pXEuzbp3XEyX0BLAvq22XT1D+64CNKddQi6Yaw6n4oyuBhgwXgrsVqZOd5n83mR4v0eALTdRNnmLuc4p/gH22fk5UEG8smCAxyP+pmKT0vJ5n9/HcGPVHZrWkblVix+xiRQc6cZwaIzxM9AuMtStPH4e02DJYQyof1TRixra5/1zFv5rfXGL82Wk4Yo6CPI3X8icWEsqAGZtzQFEWjbMh4XPH6tbADIGOPjdVtAZg4LvWLSmmwZgxyqqnOH14Fp/S6oA6DgyDmKXLQ71GycmVpiz6e7UqcprJkAw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=btconnect.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=btconnect.com; dkim=pass header.d=btconnect.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-btconnect-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=SCAGY+o1Nt1x9PpLdGt8JUVGbLTM9MN/hnghuVdbsFs=; b=ie6S4Lp1q+LfFuzb8jko8O1wBpt4ZfXQxhigDW911VgJzMFB1GauiG2YzBPQS4pftHfbKYdAfv2RK/WijyXbce9YCo4O3V8e5MVx80Q2WOYOJCpMugcjkToGdJCX0u7ODauaoOlPkFgNv/0+T1BQ/rYicM3kjxzJWZOpJm95wTc=
Received: from AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:134::11) by AM7PR07MB6246.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:139::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3455.13; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 10:59:33 +0000
Received: from AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::ad44:1086:3767:a804]) by AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::ad44:1086:3767:a804%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3455.020; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 10:59:33 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>, "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
CC: "draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
Thread-Index: AdaY1LuALWlBbybiQBmQ3luSJJ9RCACXpovUAFglmT0=
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 10:59:33 +0000
Message-ID: <AM7PR07MB6248258A6264E4B1E82B9C12A00A0@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <00d001d698d4$f1bca890$d535f9b0$@olddog.co.uk>, <AM7PR07MB624861C8609DACDCF5A3B110A00C0@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM7PR07MB624861C8609DACDCF5A3B110A00C0@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=btconnect.com;
x-originating-ip: [86.146.121.140]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: ad6a23ec-15d0-4f01-f179-08d86ab012f5
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM7PR07MB6246:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM7PR07MB62464C136C63A1A27925D585A00A0@AM7PR07MB6246.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:3968;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: DwbyW8t4yC5HmO2wZFWpIna4h05zPTtwwWi2s6EVhhwGphKm/fj/dsb3FSy/HZbyPolNBcv1FYJOV9UdJwlOkTIHVujewAUNTg92z0i86yNxSJbZ10JfRbu4P91u2FbZ1NH2L6N6VSO5plwvbQMDud3OAfnauPaGurKbRhhE+AQbpqELVyK7I0O3RJPRo3hLw1OEKRIO3QyGd0zo0CjkkzUNv0l+5YHYcO5Vo9qdkAbIAAeTbPKBiFykNVOzFmcDR+W5YaPSjMM9DHtx2Zp4b1PF4oI7OaUL49n0Dk3ZMMP4PjxKQZ03+AcbiQy11LbnwyX576m0vK4onhuCum7R0xsiD5WmztBOVfgmiwAA3IAvyOJh2wyhfuM99TJEZvwZ9ZIdXgiW6xwmDvhzHMVUvQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:;  IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE;  SFS:(136003)(396003)(366004)(39860400002)(346002)(376002)(26005)(6506007)(2906002)(33656002)(53546011)(4326008)(5660300002)(186003)(966005)(9686003)(7696005)(66946007)(91956017)(76116006)(66476007)(55016002)(83380400001)(478600001)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(8936002)(316002)(71200400001)(83080400001)(86362001)(15650500001)(52536014)(110136005)(8676002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; 
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: ad6a23ec-15d0-4f01-f179-08d86ab012f5
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Oct 2020 10:59:33.6148 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: U3wvNDvKkuZr+zq3biD+zEzetmwtFgkdNVil0kM+SW4WJhei+55XbaK7Jx4T9iSOMzEs5Lx/Eu3zDwNsq1Rdmw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM7PR07MB6246
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/X2WGmHQcWbPHOfUDU5W2JSuqtQs>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 10:59:43 -0000

From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.=
com>=0A=
Sent: 05 October 2020 17:47=0A=
=0A=
Some more technical comments=0A=
=0A=
Abbreviations need expanding;  FEC, DDMAP, RSC. Probably best done in s.1.2=
=0A=
=0A=
s.3.2=0A=
31740-31747=0A=
not defined=0A=
=0A=
s.6.1.3=0A=
[1] [2]=0A=
but I do not see the notes=0A=
=0A=
28 AM=0A=
=0A=
s.6.2.1 and other sections thereafter=0A=
The note about when a response is required would benefit from a reference=
=0A=
=0A=
s.6.2.2=0A=
31740 - 31747=0A=
not defined=0A=
=0A=
Type 9=0A=
defined twice=0A=
=0A=
s.6.2.3=0A=
31740-31747=0A=
not defined=0A=
=0A=
s.6.2.4=0A=
31740-31747=0A=
not defined=0A=
=0A=
s.6.2.5=0A=
31740-31747=0A=
not defined=0A=
=0A=
s.6.2.6=0A=
31740-31747=0A=
not defined=0A=
=0A=
s.6.2.7=0A=
31740-31747 =0A=
not defined=0A=
=0A=
SubTLVs appears in section headings, sub-TLVs and Sub-TLVS in text; suggest=
 consistency=0A=
=0A=
Tom Petch=0A=
=0A=
From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddo=
g.co.uk>=0A=
Sent: 02 October 2020 16:59=0A=
=0A=
I know this is not the most exciting document the working group has ever=0A=
produced, but as shepherd I need to see some comments and expressions of=0A=
support.=0A=
=0A=
<tp>=0A=
Overcome  by the enormity of the task, complicated because of the sheer lev=
el of detail.  The spelling is a bit unusual but that can wait.=0A=
=0A=
What strikes me most is that RFC8126 is an Informative Reference.  Sort of =
fits, since that RFC clarifies the terminology that should be used, and thi=
s I-D does not use it:-(  It defines Groups and Registries and the Group he=
re is Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture which does not get a menti=
on which I think an omission. Registries come next as in Message Types, Rep=
ly Modes and Return Codes, and TLVs so I think that s.1.2 should reference =
 RFC8126 Normatively and use these exemplars.  The only thing that s.1.2 ne=
eds to clarify is the Sub-TLV which is the term in use at present on the we=
bsite but that RFC does not use the term sub-registry so whether or not it =
is worth defining I find debatable.  I would be inclined to avoid 'subregis=
try' entirely but suggest contacting IANA to ask what term they would like =
to see for the Sub-TLVs definitions.   I do think it wrong for this I-D to =
refer to 'registry for subTLVs' because the registry is 'TLVs'!=0A=
=0A=
A more complex point is that once this I-D has been actioned, the IANA Regi=
stries will have been updated and it will be difficult, impossible may be, =
to make sense of this I-D and what it has done because what is there now, w=
hat it is updating, will be difficult or impossible to establish.  The I-D =
should contain a picture of how the registries are now, an Appendix would s=
eem suitable, taken from the current IANA definitions, the text that appear=
s on the screen at present.=0A=
=0A=
When reviewing this I-D, I find myself repeatedly referring to the website =
so having that as text in the I-D would make reviewing easier for me.  They=
 are available as CSV and the last time this topic got reviewed I downloade=
d them all.=0A=
=0A=
Tom Petch=0A=
=0A=
Thanks,=0A=
Adrian=0A=
-----Original Message-----=0A=
From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel=0A=
Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32=0A=
To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>=0A=
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org=0A=
Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call :=0A=
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04=0A=
=0A=
Hi MPLS WG,=0A=
=0A=
As previously noted, I'm the shepherd for this document and I'm running the=
=0A=
working group last call as agreed by the chairs.=0A=
=0A=
This email starts a two-week last call on=0A=
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04=0A=
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update=
/=0A=
=0A=
Please send your opinions to the mailing list before October 9th.=0A=
=0A=
While yes/no opinions are not without value, it is far more helpful if you=
=0A=
can indicate whether you have read the latest version of the draft, and wha=
t=0A=
the reasons are for your opinions.=0A=
=0A=
Of course, all of your review comments will be helpful in improving the=0A=
document.=0A=
=0A=
Best,=0A=
Adrian=0A=
=0A=
_______________________________________________=0A=
mpls mailing list=0A=
mpls@ietf.org=0A=
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls=0A=
=0A=
_______________________________________________=0A=
mpls mailing list=0A=
mpls@ietf.org=0A=
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls=0A=
=0A=
_______________________________________________=0A=
mpls mailing list=0A=
mpls@ietf.org=0A=
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls=0A=


From nobody Fri Oct  9 00:46:37 2020
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9EC3A0D03; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 00:46:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.11
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.213, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MiNCNNZgCsAZ; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 00:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 777283A0D06; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 00:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (unknown [124.104.122.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 883D5321AE7; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 09:46:22 +0200 (CEST)
To: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, adrian@olddog.co.uk, 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
References: <00d001d698d4$f1bca890$d535f9b0$@olddog.co.uk> <2bd58cc3-4995-8346-cb77-ae0d81fe355d@nokia.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <1627b4bd-972e-f65e-747f-259897586d91@pi.nu>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:46:20 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2bd58cc3-4995-8346-cb77-ae0d81fe355d@nokia.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------F959AC3A290C3064DBAB4955"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/V1tNhjhLHh_-ujfwFWtdpVdEUt8>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 07:46:36 -0000

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------F959AC3A290C3064DBAB4955
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Martin,

Thanks for the support! I have started preparing version-05 of this 
document.

I have included the first version of my working copy, mostly to show 
what I have done and so that commenters can check how their comments
have been addressed.

I have addressed most of your comments, but left a few question in this 
mail. And will addressed the faulty registry ranges together with the 
comments from Tom on the same subject.

Thanks for taking the time.


On 05/10/2020 06:03, Martin Vigoureux wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I should read the docs in my queue instead but ...
> 
>        a sub-registry is used when a code point allocated in a registry
>        need code points scoped by that or a set of code points.
> this is a bit hard to parse. at least s/need/needs/

I have fixed the s/need/needs/

But I would be happy to get some help with this, what is there now is 
the third or fourth iteration

What about:

        a sub-registry is used when a code point, or a set of code
        points allocated in a single registry, needs "sub-code points"
        scoped by the code point or the set of code points.

Any help appreciated.


> 
> 
>     The range of each TLV and sub-TLV registry is divided into two
>     blocks, one with a range from 0 to 32767 for TLVs and sub-TLVs that
>     require a response if not recognized.  The other block has the range
>     from 32768 to 65535 for TLVs and sub-TLVs that may be silently
>     dropped, stepped over or an error message sent, if not recognized.

> this seems like saying exactly the same thing than what the two bullet 
> points above (in the draft) say.

Yes I think you are right, the text and bullets have converged over 
time; should I drop the text or the bullets?
> 
> 
> In:
>     o  If the unrecognized TLV or sub-TLV is from the Experimental Use
>        range (37140-37143) or from the FCFS range (31744-32767) a the
>        Return Code of 2 ("One or more of the TLVs was not understood")
>        will be sent in the echo response.
> and in the table of:
> 3.2.  Common Registration Procedures for TLVs and sub-TLVs
> 
>     37140-37143 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned
> is the range correct?
> shouldn't it be 31740-31743?
> BTW, This table doesn't have a number like all other. May be you should 
> call it Table 1 (and renumber all other).

yes - you are right. However, Tom have listed morer of the same, I will 
do a separate spin and update all the ranges
> 
> 
> Section 2 says:
>     o  In the listing of assiged code points the term "Vendor Private
>        Use" is changed to "Private Use"

.
Yes - this is correct. The Message Types, Reply Modes and Return Codes 
registries (section 2) keep the Private Use" registration policies.
Note: I wanted to chage this to FCFS, but since range was only 4 
possible allocation, and this is to small for an FCFS range, we kept the 
Private Use regostrion policy.
> but 3.3.1 says:
>     o  In the listing of assignments the term "Vendor Private Use" is
>        changed to "First Come First Served (FCFS)".

Yes - that is section 3 that discusses the TLVs and sub-TLVs (that have 
sufficient space for a FCFS registrion policy). So this is correct.
> 
> note there are other differences:
>     o  A note "Not to be assigned" is added for the registration
>        procedures "Private Use" and "Experimental Use".
>     o  A note saying "Not to be assigned" is added for the registration
>        procedures "Experimental Use".

Correct for the same reason as above.
> 
>     o  In the lists that capture the assignment status, the fields that
>        are reserved, i.e.  0 (zero), Private Use and Experimental Use are
>        clearly marked as such.
>     o  In the list that captures assignment status, the fields that are
>        reserved, i.e.  0 (zero) and Experimental Use are clearly marked.
> Not sure whether they are intentional.
> 
This is correst for the same reason as above
> >
>     Some referenced RFCs use the concept "mandatory TLVs" and "mandatory
>     sub-TLVs" to indicate that, if a TLV or sub-TLV of the range 0-16383
>     or 16384-31743 in a message is not understood, an error message needs
>     to be sent in response.
> RFC 8029 talks about mandatory TLVs for a range up to 32767:
>     Types less than 32768 (i.e., with the high-order bit equal to 0) are
>     mandatory TLVs
> BTW you says that clearly in 4.1, so I think this should be consistent 
> here.
> 
So you say that this would be better

     Some referenced RFCs use the concept "mandatory TLVs" and "mandatory
     sub-TLVs" to indicate that, if a TLV or sub-TLV of the range 0-32767
     in a message is not understood, an error message needs to be sent in
     response.
> 
> You say:
>     The Value field contains the TLVs, including sub-TLVs, that were
>     not understood, encoded as sub-TLVs.
> But 8209 was saying:
>     The Value field contains the TLVs that were not understood, encoded
>     as sub-TLVs.
> This is not only a "removing mandatory" change. you seem to now impose 
> that sub-TLVs be sent. Is that the intent?
> 

I think my text is correct, RFC 8029 is a bit vague. But RFC 8029 
implies that a TLV that includes a unrecognized sub-TLV an error message 
should be sent. But you need to return the entire TLV (with its 
sub-TLVs). If you return  the sub-TLV only the might be several sub-TLVs 
in the message that has the same type. You need the entire TLV for context.

> 
> In Tables 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 20
>     | 37140-37144 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
>     | 31748-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
> are these ranges correct?
> shouldn't they be
>     | 31740-31743 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
>     | 31744-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for TLVs anf sub- |
> 
Probably not, I'll check this as when I take care of  the corresponding 
comments from Tom.
> 
> Nits:
> s/This docuemtment/This document/                       + (+-sign means that it is fixed)
> s/An exasmple/An example/                               +
> s/contaimer for regiistries/container for registries/   +
> s/sunregistry/sub-registry/                             +
> s/assiged/assigned/                                     - (fixed becasue of another comment)
> s/range for "RFC Required" range/"RFC Required" range/  +
> s/i.e.  0/i.e., 0/ (2 occurences)                       + (sometimes I wish I understood how
                                                              to use the 
comma in English :)). 

> s/registry [IANA-RC] registry/registry [IANA-RC]/       +
> s/sennt/sent/                                           - (fixed becasue of another comment) 
> s/First come, first served/First Come First Served/     +
> s/defintions/definitions/                               +
> s/Experimetal Use/Experimental Use/                     +
> s/a the/a/                                              +
> s/srange (64508-64511).  or/range (64508-64511) or/     +
> s/sub- TLVs/sub-TLVs/                                   +
> s/TLVs an sub/TLVs and sub/                             +
> s/TLVs anf sub/TLVs and sub/                            +
> s/First Come Frst Served (FCFS)/First Come First Served (FCFS)/   +
> s/Experiemental Use/Experimental Use/                   +
> s/The first set are/The first set is/                   +
> s/the second set are/the second set is/                 +
> s/the range there the/the range of/?
The sentence say:
     the second set is for the
     range there the TLV or sub-TLV that may be silently
     dropped if not recognized.
What about:

     the second set is for the
     range there the TLV or sub-TLV may be silently
     dropped if not recognized.

Changed. Comment?

> s/The text in those two paragraphs are/The text in those two paragraphs is/  +
> s/resereved/reserved/ (9 occurences)                 +
> s/Four code point has/Four code points have/ (3 occurences)    +
> s/Two small sets, 4 code points each, has/Two small sets, 4 code points 
> each, have/ (7 occurences)   +
> s/recognised/recognized/     +
> 
> 
> beyond that, I support this document moving forward.

Martin, tnx!!

/Loa
> 
> -m
> 
> Le 2020-10-02 à 17:59, Adrian Farrel a écrit :
>> I know this is not the most exciting document the working group has ever
>> produced, but as shepherd I need to see some comments and expressions of
>> support.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Adrian
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
>> Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32
>> To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
>> Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
>> Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call :
>> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
>>
>> Hi MPLS WG,
>>
>> As previously noted, I'm the shepherd for this document and I'm 
>> running the
>> working group last call as agreed by the chairs.
>>
>> This email starts a two-week last call on
>> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update/ 
>>
>>
>> Please send your opinions to the mailing list before October 9th.
>>
>> While yes/no opinions are not without value, it is far more helpful if 
>> you
>> can indicate whether you have read the latest version of the draft, 
>> and what
>> the reasons are for your opinions.
>>
>> Of course, all of your review comments will be helpful in improving the
>> document.
>>
>> Best,
>> Adrian
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64

--------------F959AC3A290C3064DBAB4955
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 name="draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-05-00.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-05-00.txt"
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--------------F959AC3A290C3064DBAB4955--


From nobody Fri Oct  9 01:38:47 2020
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46E63A0D7B; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 01:38:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nU4H0ZPC3YmY; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 01:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta5.iomartmail.com (mta5.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3101F3A0D4D; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 01:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta5.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 0998ceoI029298; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 09:38:40 +0100
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1812C2204A; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 09:38:40 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C37922048; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 09:38:40 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([195.166.134.5]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 0998ccBq021457 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Oct 2020 09:38:39 +0100
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "'mpls'" <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 09:38:38 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <061701d69e17$962f3180$c28d9480$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AdaeF4y+WWxs7eiZQ4aM9uNrryFi/w==
X-Originating-IP: 195.166.134.5
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25714.005
X-TM-AS-Result: No--16.546-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--16.546-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25714.005
X-TMASE-Result: 10--16.545500-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 9QH3ZAbuSOTxIbpQ8BhdbE7yqWc5cVLPnigQ/9LjZDb5LkL/TyFZzbGF +Vo4vAw6zdm90HuvnNVoxXoWL2GVj6zMshKkfwvzXK5keCa+bmgeHE5OH9VZS35Isu006IGGZJ2 3hwfoyRvtyeaPW2NRnKaFveJZn82XH+SilsaV2w1Q+S0N05fR+5x04u9h3SZmT7zqZowzdpLnJK F5zgSYMnWe37vTQwGu4l4N5XJI8h03ohqtjZUuxXDfixW9O5cY3/sybDt23/61eX0jEQ9c6mqXI ouVPIIsvYKC2gleE+zrjwNj/AeuzfRRSekxEEzvJtgtn0dnvgf2kudi1D33Epm3TxN83Lo4eCly CIx6C47zD4h78ZZ5B2sIZin4LZ2lfs5hB+q5V/fwpAypldoLOT17tS9vI0pxPILl10bYlyAWA9h Gtz6LZOLzNWBegCW2XC3N7C7YzrfQqQhSw0x2VN0H8LFZNFG7/nnwJ52QYi8hem0kmpPZMQ==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/1hXqmF1S0vwb3KhCXqXT2aRl5KY>
Subject: [mpls] Working group last call completed: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 08:38:46 -0000

Authors and working group,

The last call period for this draft has ended.

There was feedback from three people on-list all of whom had comments and
proposals to improve the document.

The authors should address these reviews and produce a new version of the
draft at their convenience.

In the meantime, three comments of support (and none of objection) does not
seem to me like consensus to publish (although it is also not consensus to
not publish). While this is a mainly a process document, and it is clear
that the WG chairs/secretary support the work (as co-authors), maybe the WG
could express something a little more than complete disinterest.

What about all of you OAM experts? What about the people with code for LSP
Ping?

Please continue sending opinions on the work while the authors are making
the new revision.

Thanks,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32
To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call :
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04

Hi MPLS WG,

As previously noted, I'm the shepherd for this document and I'm running the
working group last call as agreed by the chairs.

This email starts a two-week last call on
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update/

Please send your opinions to the mailing list before October 9th.

While yes/no opinions are not without value, it is far more helpful if you
can indicate whether you have read the latest version of the draft, and what
the reasons are for your opinions.

Of course, all of your review comments will be helpful in improving the
document.

Best,
Adrian

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls


From nobody Fri Oct  9 02:45:31 2020
Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 633A23A0E18; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 02:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bfl9AbDVHnuU; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 02:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR05-AM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am6eur05on2110.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.22.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 060533A0E17; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 02:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=PVi4+EGnGZZPbzpNrNbMxWY3qVYeHp0pFH8t+4GHFrGvZf6a/WsmSLRrCvIXA9SjE3Ys0k33/MUSwW6FK5EjWXLDqdQTVZrM73MwZY+OcJ9fJZBTUyCYqtePYcmVLhVAEhCO/z9L7v/Fj+jh28rSeKnZcELozFUmyvh+MMQ66CxqGzJi2eRacarB7lqLaMg1xWLxoezHtpfoFI3b4OAMFVIRof4wSSOg4OmZcKYJOvQ3LV+lbi9NYo3cU8i9TaidHHBy6mWspr4h/O6K6k1FIc2BHtuVgc1Rs0fyMe/dSs9bKKKCs5JaBMJLE3jdz13ZystoQZeTrD9+5w3mnsnJpw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;  s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=w38rEZhs0FhMAL9d/HRBLrNYpgzis6y+YAcEnh+MuYI=; b=deOPoDuNyj4yuK1pTm16rYK+ik1VXYQOV7euP26sC54O/cvwcuQ7Xzo+Gjq1aVqm42sPwO7dojXNojrUV24O0sOFYMN2kltkNYp6h+MZTdoGKLnLuOhkWEqj+vqqttIc5L4ifZwOLu9S9leD0nhEpLSrSYQFgipvQzpCfb2YI82uoNc7NXNzSThgYbmjBn9xCSoMAgethwUgJ12oQfs82gwlzx9ewmDb0aQ2zVM714S2zt/NnrHk330Cz61m6DLzqKHY7DUodESQnp8ItZxyOyZxnicCz81DIjmyYa1OVQmp5ys8JuHVtwspINJ7D/QVrGpNIUW4gNUf2gGb84ensg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=btconnect.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=btconnect.com; dkim=pass header.d=btconnect.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-btconnect-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=w38rEZhs0FhMAL9d/HRBLrNYpgzis6y+YAcEnh+MuYI=; b=n+uxdlleZmMLa+Ks/nK3hQcATT1Zzdg+w8fQVp/8KkF8wM+HSFqBWYiKu2ly6gz4bIKRTWwcy2S3aqB70l0B95egRAvJ0olECOS+bUZKq2mFJsKfcBDTMNt/7d5WjfgtGOHDWcgqOmT1Bq1xbTT0smcP0vKMKRwMlga9QOJ5hlI=
Received: from AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:134::11) by AM7PR07MB6931.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:1b1::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3477.11; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 09:45:25 +0000
Received: from AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::ad44:1086:3767:a804]) by AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::ad44:1086:3767:a804%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3477.011; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 09:45:25 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Working group last call completed: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
Thread-Index: AdaeF4y+WWxs7eiZQ4aM9uNrryFi/wACHe5r
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 09:45:25 +0000
Message-ID: <AM7PR07MB6248EC7F6C5B528021C57696A0080@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <061701d69e17$962f3180$c28d9480$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <061701d69e17$962f3180$c28d9480$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
authentication-results: olddog.co.uk; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; olddog.co.uk; dmarc=none action=none header.from=btconnect.com; 
x-originating-ip: [86.146.121.140]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 9f3278cd-f6fc-45ec-5a19-08d86c380c5d
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM7PR07MB6931:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM7PR07MB6931B89D7F3CCB1D602214ACA0080@AM7PR07MB6931.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: PbuED/6vGXmJa22ogeWH/rVfTTZ/DADtFESBD3qjmL8wKRGlhRzDxS2RY6WpLR0+TY+1SHaeFcdU97N5eSss7ff1H5SuCy2Csw+yrJMaMr7uDIAkZE7hsaikxjPc9fPWZBHoWso3JmXMTs3AhPBvO/VakIFbyfMzTsolE9chdZ20qmnu7QbyqrG/zLD/LHQOgSUezperit4Zq2HLhqshgYXj4oyO55OdRScvhXthEXNgF30hTyHindOl6OgFa+je0caOQeTEj64BaoHlj/1Za7WYY3yqnWiKjZzvBHaTq7FPjZVOiiCrJ5Xke3gIaiLtmfgrXz+PoP1sYaNxd0KSLvDMPEZWZ4QJdxGpOequ3TIMDSE6CVIJ3k+7AtWwllCypLBaCF0v756N7CjBxdywsQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:;  IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE;  SFS:(376002)(366004)(39860400002)(346002)(396003)(136003)(6506007)(66946007)(64756008)(91956017)(76116006)(52536014)(4326008)(66476007)(966005)(186003)(110136005)(478600001)(66556008)(316002)(71200400001)(55016002)(26005)(86362001)(66446008)(83080400001)(7696005)(33656002)(8936002)(15650500001)(53546011)(5660300002)(8676002)(2906002)(83380400001)(9686003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; 
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 9f3278cd-f6fc-45ec-5a19-08d86c380c5d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Oct 2020 09:45:25.3441 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: Ifj5RccmgwwjbiBlnI+x5hGq88qhRroUsnSQUC4SMcoU3IQsKoj8uKDPuKOnlErWvMDeS7N75flG2Ca1LyW8cA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM7PR07MB6931
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/XXAHX1ZmW7p3uwD2wGODfzkvFd4>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Working group last call completed: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 09:45:30 -0000

From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddo=
g.co.uk>=0A=
Sent: 09 October 2020 09:38=0A=
=0A=
Authors and working group,=0A=
=0A=
The last call period for this draft has ended.=0A=
=0A=
There was feedback from three people on-list all of whom had comments and=
=0A=
proposals to improve the document.=0A=
=0A=
The authors should address these reviews and produce a new version of the=
=0A=
draft at their convenience.=0A=
=0A=
In the meantime, three comments of support (and none of objection) does not=
=0A=
seem to me like consensus to publish (although it is also not consensus to=
=0A=
not publish). While this is a mainly a process document, and it is clear=0A=
that the WG chairs/secretary support the work (as co-authors), maybe the WG=
=0A=
could express something a little more than complete disinterest.=0A=
=0A=
What about all of you OAM experts? What about the people with code for LSP=
=0A=
Ping?=0A=
=0A=
<tp>=0A=
=0A=
Adrian=0A=
=0A=
If I have understood the document, then it makes no change to LSP Ping prot=
ocol in any way.  It amends the terminology in places to bring it in line w=
ith other WG and changes the ranges available for future allocations with I=
ANA but makes no change to existing allocations or the protocol so I would =
expect most OAM experts and LSP Ping coders say that it is of no interest a=
nd no concern and perhaps not worth an e-mail to say so:-)=0A=
=0A=
I did not comment in detail on the unfamiliar English in the I-D and will a=
wait the new version before doing so; I would not be surprised if there are=
  substantial number of such issues in the new version i.e we could need a =
few more rounds.=0A=
=0A=
Tom Petch=0A=
Please continue sending opinions on the work while the authors are making=
=0A=
the new revision.=0A=
=0A=
Thanks,=0A=
Adrian=0A=
=0A=
-----Original Message-----=0A=
From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel=0A=
Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32=0A=
To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>=0A=
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org=0A=
Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call :=0A=
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04=0A=
=0A=
Hi MPLS WG,=0A=
=0A=
As previously noted, I'm the shepherd for this document and I'm running the=
=0A=
working group last call as agreed by the chairs.=0A=
=0A=
This email starts a two-week last call on=0A=
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04=0A=
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update=
/=0A=
=0A=
Please send your opinions to the mailing list before October 9th.=0A=
=0A=
While yes/no opinions are not without value, it is far more helpful if you=
=0A=
can indicate whether you have read the latest version of the draft, and wha=
t=0A=
the reasons are for your opinions.=0A=
=0A=
Of course, all of your review comments will be helpful in improving the=0A=
document.=0A=
=0A=
Best,=0A=
Adrian=0A=
=0A=
_______________________________________________=0A=
mpls mailing list=0A=
mpls@ietf.org=0A=
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls=0A=
=0A=
_______________________________________________=0A=
mpls mailing list=0A=
mpls@ietf.org=0A=
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls=0A=


From nobody Fri Oct  9 08:01:27 2020
Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518D13A0944; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 08:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YeLwulRj2Pv5; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 08:01:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82c.google.com (mail-qt1-x82c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 169E23A0925; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 08:01:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82c.google.com with SMTP id g3so8118710qtq.10; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 08:01:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;  h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+aEW9h9BFWXTCmzpqDsVWrgrST124trslPwwSFHaCzI=; b=m+nVadfoxiiWdndLvM+z+ICbtTGjLhh5t7RwEXTVOg3mxrc+b79QcxZGxGXX/2KIS3 D7D6X6UcjTKfvBAFC7gZGzqfz44ImChEK/Kw4cMD5tdMhAmmGTYfh+bsdEDzz3ax0A3/ zbbmjQSyv2rfzrhCt4UhoYp11CxWfzA/ZztCne+O5ra7XmM/mvKw89k0t2H9RGO1kkh7 KPEL2cBIAVGSQy3f8OXN34kgj6upAp3ZrqQgMUmzQJjvTHIYgUnBcLuETzPKR1lTnkC9 twb+9aEZUEfWLPJBMk6tttvEZWIercaRXu2HTaZUAM0rzGNZIIgfrMSxgFtxBuzvKO7M Rw9w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+aEW9h9BFWXTCmzpqDsVWrgrST124trslPwwSFHaCzI=; b=g7vYdGEbIzeMRHVg1wVoQzXpcYV5/ialVDWvw7QF3INNdpHRVrwR84G4/vFPCBjEbv twCNrs28TOqXZO6U/b9eSPOr9W90tz80svobO3dio3n0/HiiFPe5b48HiXNrr5lMDkp+ 8C3cGvHpeCT/tezF3rzshohvpPzFQpaYCH8bb5gsOT5KyChvyp1Se7wmcLVdyJaZFyv9 mrmrPGcsz/9uEeQ0lpr920x8a5wWtGA9D083rYSXyntoqZ3zb70EIpI6swV80VonEuUE gUi+k2N4Hn+TEEoXA0VJ7PKCkXfbzQaPRXi60uWf2LGXvNgbrcvWv9i9+Er71Ws0lxvp optw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531s2zsjtFv4c3AS5faT0WXOFZoL6Mw9wm3b6veg3O6Cvx1hmcEk DrGd5S8grKeY37IthkfKBfl5L3KmyScaDWOvomJ36nkO
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzI9eWhnilL87QlMwHt6ga9iQ2vDtmLSEWnKWEfLKCKL+r+b72OM+LR16iPdjkZumh5iFE4moZSg9jdLmNna2o=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:66d6:: with SMTP id m22mr9066157qtp.219.1602255681837;  Fri, 09 Oct 2020 08:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <00d001d698d4$f1bca890$d535f9b0$@olddog.co.uk> <2bd58cc3-4995-8346-cb77-ae0d81fe355d@nokia.com> <1627b4bd-972e-f65e-747f-259897586d91@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <1627b4bd-972e-f65e-747f-259897586d91@pi.nu>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 11:01:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU2Juh_WtqCUViJQP3hec_ZEEzu-ZSsxsQmbPz5KDVVybA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Cc: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>,  mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c15d1505b13e38cb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/fCF2FhVaAaETlYHnf4CMlpogyHY>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 15:01:26 -0000

--000000000000c15d1505b13e38cb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Loa,

The "why" paragraph doesn't have to be anything profound, just some
additional motivation. The current text is clear in what it does, I would
just like a bit of why. Your earlier email hinted at it (you said there was
some history involved) so just include a bit of that.

Thanks,
Andy


On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 3:46 AM Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:

> Martin,
>
> Thanks for the support! I have started preparing version-05 of this
> document.
>
> I have included the first version of my working copy, mostly to show
> what I have done and so that commenters can check how their comments
> have been addressed.
>
> I have addressed most of your comments, but left a few question in this
> mail. And will addressed the faulty registry ranges together with the
> comments from Tom on the same subject.
>
> Thanks for taking the time.
>
>
> On 05/10/2020 06:03, Martin Vigoureux wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I should read the docs in my queue instead but ...
> >
> >        a sub-registry is used when a code point allocated in a registry
> >        need code points scoped by that or a set of code points.
> > this is a bit hard to parse. at least s/need/needs/
>
> I have fixed the s/need/needs/
>
> But I would be happy to get some help with this, what is there now is
> the third or fourth iteration
>
> What about:
>
>         a sub-registry is used when a code point, or a set of code
>         points allocated in a single registry, needs "sub-code points"
>         scoped by the code point or the set of code points.
>
> Any help appreciated.
>
>
> >
> >
> >     The range of each TLV and sub-TLV registry is divided into two
> >     blocks, one with a range from 0 to 32767 for TLVs and sub-TLVs that
> >     require a response if not recognized.  The other block has the rang=
e
> >     from 32768 to 65535 for TLVs and sub-TLVs that may be silently
> >     dropped, stepped over or an error message sent, if not recognized.
>
> > this seems like saying exactly the same thing than what the two bullet
> > points above (in the draft) say.
>
> Yes I think you are right, the text and bullets have converged over
> time; should I drop the text or the bullets?
> >
> >
> > In:
> >     o  If the unrecognized TLV or sub-TLV is from the Experimental Use
> >        range (37140-37143) or from the FCFS range (31744-32767) a the
> >        Return Code of 2 ("One or more of the TLVs was not understood")
> >        will be sent in the echo response.
> > and in the table of:
> > 3.2.  Common Registration Procedures for TLVs and sub-TLVs
> >
> >     37140-37143 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned
> > is the range correct?
> > shouldn't it be 31740-31743?
> > BTW, This table doesn't have a number like all other. May be you should
> > call it Table 1 (and renumber all other).
>
> yes - you are right. However, Tom have listed morer of the same, I will
> do a separate spin and update all the ranges
> >
> >
> > Section 2 says:
> >     o  In the listing of assiged code points the term "Vendor Private
> >        Use" is changed to "Private Use"
>
> .
> Yes - this is correct. The Message Types, Reply Modes and Return Codes
> registries (section 2) keep the Private Use" registration policies.
> Note: I wanted to chage this to FCFS, but since range was only 4
> possible allocation, and this is to small for an FCFS range, we kept the
> Private Use regostrion policy.
> > but 3.3.1 says:
> >     o  In the listing of assignments the term "Vendor Private Use" is
> >        changed to "First Come First Served (FCFS)".
>
> Yes - that is section 3 that discusses the TLVs and sub-TLVs (that have
> sufficient space for a FCFS registrion policy). So this is correct.
> >
> > note there are other differences:
> >     o  A note "Not to be assigned" is added for the registration
> >        procedures "Private Use" and "Experimental Use".
> >     o  A note saying "Not to be assigned" is added for the registration
> >        procedures "Experimental Use".
>
> Correct for the same reason as above.
> >
> >     o  In the lists that capture the assignment status, the fields that
> >        are reserved, i.e.  0 (zero), Private Use and Experimental Use a=
re
> >        clearly marked as such.
> >     o  In the list that captures assignment status, the fields that are
> >        reserved, i.e.  0 (zero) and Experimental Use are clearly marked=
.
> > Not sure whether they are intentional.
> >
> This is correst for the same reason as above
> > >
> >     Some referenced RFCs use the concept "mandatory TLVs" and "mandator=
y
> >     sub-TLVs" to indicate that, if a TLV or sub-TLV of the range 0-1638=
3
> >     or 16384-31743 in a message is not understood, an error message nee=
ds
> >     to be sent in response.
> > RFC 8029 talks about mandatory TLVs for a range up to 32767:
> >     Types less than 32768 (i.e., with the high-order bit equal to 0) ar=
e
> >     mandatory TLVs
> > BTW you says that clearly in 4.1, so I think this should be consistent
> > here.
> >
> So you say that this would be better
>
>      Some referenced RFCs use the concept "mandatory TLVs" and "mandatory
>      sub-TLVs" to indicate that, if a TLV or sub-TLV of the range 0-32767
>      in a message is not understood, an error message needs to be sent in
>      response.
> >
> > You say:
> >     The Value field contains the TLVs, including sub-TLVs, that were
> >     not understood, encoded as sub-TLVs.
> > But 8209 was saying:
> >     The Value field contains the TLVs that were not understood, encoded
> >     as sub-TLVs.
> > This is not only a "removing mandatory" change. you seem to now impose
> > that sub-TLVs be sent. Is that the intent?
> >
>
> I think my text is correct, RFC 8029 is a bit vague. But RFC 8029
> implies that a TLV that includes a unrecognized sub-TLV an error message
> should be sent. But you need to return the entire TLV (with its
> sub-TLVs). If you return  the sub-TLV only the might be several sub-TLVs
> in the message that has the same type. You need the entire TLV for contex=
t.
>
> >
> > In Tables 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 20
> >     | 37140-37144 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned   =
 |
> >     | 31748-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that=
 |
> > are these ranges correct?
> > shouldn't they be
> >     | 31740-31743 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned   =
 |
> >     | 31744-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for TLVs anf sub-=
 |
> >
> Probably not, I'll check this as when I take care of  the corresponding
> comments from Tom.
> >
> > Nits:
> > s/This docuemtment/This document/                       + (+-sign means
> that it is fixed)
> > s/An exasmple/An example/                               +
> > s/contaimer for regiistries/container for registries/   +
> > s/sunregistry/sub-registry/                             +
> > s/assiged/assigned/                                     - (fixed becasu=
e
> of another comment)
> > s/range for "RFC Required" range/"RFC Required" range/  +
> > s/i.e.  0/i.e., 0/ (2 occurences)                       + (sometimes I
> wish I understood how
>                                                               to use the
> comma in English :)).
>
> > s/registry [IANA-RC] registry/registry [IANA-RC]/       +
> > s/sennt/sent/                                           - (fixed becasu=
e
> of another comment)
> > s/First come, first served/First Come First Served/     +
> > s/defintions/definitions/                               +
> > s/Experimetal Use/Experimental Use/                     +
> > s/a the/a/                                              +
> > s/srange (64508-64511).  or/range (64508-64511) or/     +
> > s/sub- TLVs/sub-TLVs/                                   +
> > s/TLVs an sub/TLVs and sub/                             +
> > s/TLVs anf sub/TLVs and sub/                            +
> > s/First Come Frst Served (FCFS)/First Come First Served (FCFS)/   +
> > s/Experiemental Use/Experimental Use/                   +
> > s/The first set are/The first set is/                   +
> > s/the second set are/the second set is/                 +
> > s/the range there the/the range of/?
> The sentence say:
>      the second set is for the
>      range there the TLV or sub-TLV that may be silently
>      dropped if not recognized.
> What about:
>
>      the second set is for the
>      range there the TLV or sub-TLV may be silently
>      dropped if not recognized.
>
> Changed. Comment?
>
> > s/The text in those two paragraphs are/The text in those two paragraphs
> is/  +
> > s/resereved/reserved/ (9 occurences)                 +
> > s/Four code point has/Four code points have/ (3 occurences)    +
> > s/Two small sets, 4 code points each, has/Two small sets, 4 code points
> > each, have/ (7 occurences)   +
> > s/recognised/recognized/     +
> >
> >
> > beyond that, I support this document moving forward.
>
> Martin, tnx!!
>
> /Loa
> >
> > -m
> >
> > Le 2020-10-02 =C3=A0 17:59, Adrian Farrel a =C3=A9crit :
> >> I know this is not the most exciting document the working group has ev=
er
> >> produced, but as shepherd I need to see some comments and expressions =
of
> >> support.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Adrian
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> >> Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32
> >> To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
> >> Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
> >> Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call :
> >> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
> >>
> >> Hi MPLS WG,
> >>
> >> As previously noted, I'm the shepherd for this document and I'm
> >> running the
> >> working group last call as agreed by the chairs.
> >>
> >> This email starts a two-week last call on
> >> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
> >>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-upda=
te/
> >>
> >>
> >> Please send your opinions to the mailing list before October 9th.
> >>
> >> While yes/no opinions are not without value, it is far more helpful if
> >> you
> >> can indicate whether you have read the latest version of the draft,
> >> and what
> >> the reasons are for your opinions.
> >>
> >> Of course, all of your review comments will be helpful in improving th=
e
> >> document.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Adrian
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mpls mailing list
> >> mpls@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mpls mailing list
> >> mpls@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpls mailing list
> > mpls@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
> --
>
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>

--000000000000c15d1505b13e38cb
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Loa,<div><br></div><div>The &quot;why&quot; paragraph does=
n&#39;t have to be anything profound, just some additional motivation. The =
current text is clear in what it does, I would just like a bit of why. Your=
 earlier email hinted at it (you said there was some history involved) so j=
ust include a bit of that.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Andy<=
/div><div><br></div></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" c=
lass=3D"gmail_attr">On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 3:46 AM Loa Andersson &lt;<a hre=
f=3D"mailto:loa@pi.nu">loa@pi.nu</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rg=
b(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Martin,<br>
<br>
Thanks for the support! I have started preparing version-05 of this <br>
document.<br>
<br>
I have included the first version of my working copy, mostly to show <br>
what I have done and so that commenters can check how their comments<br>
have been addressed.<br>
<br>
I have addressed most of your comments, but left a few question in this <br=
>
mail. And will addressed the faulty registry ranges together with the <br>
comments from Tom on the same subject.<br>
<br>
Thanks for taking the time.<br>
<br>
<br>
On 05/10/2020 06:03, Martin Vigoureux wrote:<br>
&gt; Hi<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; I should read the docs in my queue instead but ...<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 a sub-registry is used when a cod=
e point allocated in a registry<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 need code points scoped by that o=
r a set of code points.<br>
&gt; this is a bit hard to parse. at least s/need/needs/<br>
<br>
I have fixed the s/need/needs/<br>
<br>
But I would be happy to get some help with this, what is there now is <br>
the third or fourth iteration<br>
<br>
What about:<br>
<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 a sub-registry is used when a code point, or a =
set of code<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 points allocated in a single registry, needs &q=
uot;sub-code points&quot;<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 scoped by the code point or the set of code poi=
nts.<br>
<br>
Any help appreciated.<br>
<br>
<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 The range of each TLV and sub-TLV registry is divid=
ed into two<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 blocks, one with a range from 0 to 32767 for TLVs a=
nd sub-TLVs that<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 require a response if not recognized.=C2=A0 The oth=
er block has the range<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 from 32768 to 65535 for TLVs and sub-TLVs that may =
be silently<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 dropped, stepped over or an error message sent, if =
not recognized.<br>
<br>
&gt; this seems like saying exactly the same thing than what the two bullet=
 <br>
&gt; points above (in the draft) say.<br>
<br>
Yes I think you are right, the text and bullets have converged over <br>
time; should I drop the text or the bullets?<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; In:<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 o=C2=A0 If the unrecognized TLV or sub-TLV is from =
the Experimental Use<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 range (37140-37143) or from the F=
CFS range (31744-32767) a the<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Return Code of 2 (&quot;One or mo=
re of the TLVs was not understood&quot;)<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 will be sent in the echo response=
.<br>
&gt; and in the table of:<br>
&gt; 3.2.=C2=A0 Common Registration Procedures for TLVs and sub-TLVs<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 37140-37143 | Experimental Use=C2=A0 | Reserved, no=
t to be assigned<br>
&gt; is the range correct?<br>
&gt; shouldn&#39;t it be 31740-31743?<br>
&gt; BTW, This table doesn&#39;t have a number like all other. May be you s=
hould <br>
&gt; call it Table 1 (and renumber all other).<br>
<br>
yes - you are right. However, Tom have listed morer of the same, I will <br=
>
do a separate spin and update all the ranges<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Section 2 says:<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 o=C2=A0 In the listing of assiged code points the t=
erm &quot;Vendor Private<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Use&quot; is changed to &quot;Pri=
vate Use&quot;<br>
<br>
.<br>
Yes - this is correct. The Message Types, Reply Modes and Return Codes <br>
registries (section 2) keep the Private Use&quot; registration policies.<br=
>
Note: I wanted to chage this to FCFS, but since range was only 4 <br>
possible allocation, and this is to small for an FCFS range, we kept the <b=
r>
Private Use regostrion policy.<br>
&gt; but 3.3.1 says:<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 o=C2=A0 In the listing of assignments the term &quo=
t;Vendor Private Use&quot; is<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 changed to &quot;First Come First=
 Served (FCFS)&quot;.<br>
<br>
Yes - that is section 3 that discusses the TLVs and sub-TLVs (that have <br=
>
sufficient space for a FCFS registrion policy). So this is correct.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; note there are other differences:<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 o=C2=A0 A note &quot;Not to be assigned&quot; is ad=
ded for the registration<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 procedures &quot;Private Use&quot=
; and &quot;Experimental Use&quot;.<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 o=C2=A0 A note saying &quot;Not to be assigned&quot=
; is added for the registration<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 procedures &quot;Experimental Use=
&quot;.<br>
<br>
Correct for the same reason as above.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 o=C2=A0 In the lists that capture the assignment st=
atus, the fields that<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 are reserved, i.e.=C2=A0 0 (zero)=
, Private Use and Experimental Use are<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 clearly marked as such.<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 o=C2=A0 In the list that captures assignment status=
, the fields that are<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 reserved, i.e.=C2=A0 0 (zero) and=
 Experimental Use are clearly marked.<br>
&gt; Not sure whether they are intentional.<br>
&gt; <br>
This is correst for the same reason as above<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 Some referenced RFCs use the concept &quot;mandator=
y TLVs&quot; and &quot;mandatory<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 sub-TLVs&quot; to indicate that, if a TLV or sub-TL=
V of the range 0-16383<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 or 16384-31743 in a message is not understood, an e=
rror message needs<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 to be sent in response.<br>
&gt; RFC 8029 talks about mandatory TLVs for a range up to 32767:<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 Types less than 32768 (i.e., with the high-order bi=
t equal to 0) are<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 mandatory TLVs<br>
&gt; BTW you says that clearly in 4.1, so I think this should be consistent=
 <br>
&gt; here.<br>
&gt; <br>
So you say that this would be better<br>
<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Some referenced RFCs use the concept &quot;mandatory TL=
Vs&quot; and &quot;mandatory<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0sub-TLVs&quot; to indicate that, if a TLV or sub-TLV of=
 the range 0-32767<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0in a message is not understood, an error message needs =
to be sent in<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0response.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; You say:<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 The Value field contains the TLVs, including sub-TL=
Vs, that were<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 not understood, encoded as sub-TLVs.<br>
&gt; But 8209 was saying:<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 The Value field contains the TLVs that were not und=
erstood, encoded<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 as sub-TLVs.<br>
&gt; This is not only a &quot;removing mandatory&quot; change. you seem to =
now impose <br>
&gt; that sub-TLVs be sent. Is that the intent?<br>
&gt; <br>
<br>
I think my text is correct, RFC 8029 is a bit vague. But RFC 8029 <br>
implies that a TLV that includes a unrecognized sub-TLV an error message <b=
r>
should be sent. But you need to return the entire TLV (with its <br>
sub-TLVs). If you return=C2=A0 the sub-TLV only the might be several sub-TL=
Vs <br>
in the message that has the same type. You need the entire TLV for context.=
<br>
<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; In Tables 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 20<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 | 37140-37144 | Experimental Use=C2=A0 | Reserved, =
not to be assigned=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 |<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 | 31748-32767 | FCFS=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 | This range is for Sub-TL=
Vs that |<br>
&gt; are these ranges correct?<br>
&gt; shouldn&#39;t they be<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 | 31740-31743 | Experimental Use=C2=A0 | Reserved, =
not to be assigned=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 |<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 | 31744-32767 | FCFS=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 | This range is for TLVs a=
nf sub- |<br>
&gt; <br>
Probably not, I&#39;ll check this as when I take care of=C2=A0 the correspo=
nding <br>
comments from Tom.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Nits:<br>
&gt; s/This docuemtment/This document/=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+ (+-sign means that it is =
fixed)<br>
&gt; s/An exasmple/An example/=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+<br>
&gt; s/contaimer for regiistries/container for registries/=C2=A0 =C2=A0+<br=
>
&gt; s/sunregistry/sub-registry/=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+<br>
&gt; s/assiged/assigned/=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 =C2=A0- (fixed becasue of another comment)<br>
&gt; s/range for &quot;RFC Required&quot; range/&quot;RFC Required&quot; ra=
nge/=C2=A0 +<br>
&gt; s/i.e.=C2=A0 0/i.e., 0/ (2 occurences)=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+ (sometimes I wish I u=
nderstood how<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 to us=
e the <br>
comma in English :)). <br>
<br>
&gt; s/registry [IANA-RC] registry/registry [IANA-RC]/=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0+<br>
&gt; s/sennt/sent/=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0- (fixed becasue of another comment) <br>
&gt; s/First come, first served/First Come First Served/=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0+<br>
&gt; s/defintions/definitions/=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+<br>
&gt; s/Experimetal Use/Experimental Use/=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+<br>
&gt; s/a the/a/=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 +<br>
&gt; s/srange (64508-64511).=C2=A0 or/range (64508-64511) or/=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0+<br>
&gt; s/sub- TLVs/sub-TLVs/=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0+<br>
&gt; s/TLVs an sub/TLVs and sub/=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+<br>
&gt; s/TLVs anf sub/TLVs and sub/=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 +<br>
&gt; s/First Come Frst Served (FCFS)/First Come First Served (FCFS)/=C2=A0 =
=C2=A0+<br>
&gt; s/Experiemental Use/Experimental Use/=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+<br>
&gt; s/The first set are/The first set is/=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+<br>
&gt; s/the second set are/the second set is/=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+<br>
&gt; s/the range there the/the range of/?<br>
The sentence say:<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0the second set is for the<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0range there the TLV or sub-TLV that may be silently<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0dropped if not recognized.<br>
What about:<br>
<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0the second set is for the<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0range there the TLV or sub-TLV may be silently<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0dropped if not recognized.<br>
<br>
Changed. Comment?<br>
<br>
&gt; s/The text in those two paragraphs are/The text in those two paragraph=
s is/=C2=A0 +<br>
&gt; s/resereved/reserved/ (9 occurences)=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0=
 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+<br>
&gt; s/Four code point has/Four code points have/ (3 occurences)=C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 +<br>
&gt; s/Two small sets, 4 code points each, has/Two small sets, 4 code point=
s <br>
&gt; each, have/ (7 occurences)=C2=A0 =C2=A0+<br>
&gt; s/recognised/recognized/=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; beyond that, I support this document moving forward.<br>
<br>
Martin, tnx!!<br>
<br>
/Loa<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; -m<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Le 2020-10-02 =C3=A0 17:59, Adrian Farrel a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:<br>
&gt;&gt; I know this is not the most exciting document the working group ha=
s ever<br>
&gt;&gt; produced, but as shepherd I need to see some comments and expressi=
ons of<br>
&gt;&gt; support.<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; Thanks,<br>
&gt;&gt; Adrian<br>
&gt;&gt; -----Original Message-----<br>
&gt;&gt; From: mpls &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org" target=3D"=
_blank">mpls-bounces@ietf.org</a>&gt; On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel<br>
&gt;&gt; Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32<br>
&gt;&gt; To: &#39;mpls&#39; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:mpls@ietf.org" target=3D"=
_blank">mpls@ietf.org</a>&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; Cc: <a href=3D"mailto:draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@i=
etf.org" target=3D"_blank">draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.=
org</a><br>
&gt;&gt; Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call :<br>
&gt;&gt; draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; Hi MPLS WG,<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; As previously noted, I&#39;m the shepherd for this document and I&=
#39;m <br>
&gt;&gt; running the<br>
&gt;&gt; working group last call as agreed by the chairs.<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; This email starts a two-week last call on<br>
&gt;&gt; draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04<br>
&gt;&gt; <a href=3D"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-pi=
ng-registries-update/" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://datatra=
cker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update/</a> <br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; Please send your opinions to the mailing list before October 9th.<=
br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; While yes/no opinions are not without value, it is far more helpfu=
l if <br>
&gt;&gt; you<br>
&gt;&gt; can indicate whether you have read the latest version of the draft=
, <br>
&gt;&gt; and what<br>
&gt;&gt; the reasons are for your opinions.<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; Of course, all of your review comments will be helpful in improvin=
g the<br>
&gt;&gt; document.<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; Best,<br>
&gt;&gt; Adrian<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; _______________________________________________<br>
&gt;&gt; mpls mailing list<br>
&gt;&gt; <a href=3D"mailto:mpls@ietf.org" target=3D"_blank">mpls@ietf.org</=
a><br>
&gt;&gt; <a href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls" rel=3D"nore=
ferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls</a><br=
>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; _______________________________________________<br>
&gt;&gt; mpls mailing list<br>
&gt;&gt; <a href=3D"mailto:mpls@ietf.org" target=3D"_blank">mpls@ietf.org</=
a><br>
&gt;&gt; <a href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls" rel=3D"nore=
ferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls</a><br=
>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; _______________________________________________<br>
&gt; mpls mailing list<br>
&gt; <a href=3D"mailto:mpls@ietf.org" target=3D"_blank">mpls@ietf.org</a><b=
r>
&gt; <a href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls" rel=3D"noreferr=
er" target=3D"_blank">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls</a><br>
<br>
-- <br>
<br>
Loa Andersson=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0=
 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 email: <a href=3D"mailto:loa@pi.nu" target=3D"_blank"=
>loa@pi.nu</a><br>
Senior MPLS Expert=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 <a href=3D"mailto:loa.pi.nu@gmail.com" t=
arget=3D"_blank">loa.pi.nu@gmail.com</a><br>
Bronze Dragon Consulting=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0pho=
ne: +46 739 81 21 64<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
mpls mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:mpls@ietf.org" target=3D"_blank">mpls@ietf.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls" rel=3D"noreferrer" t=
arget=3D"_blank">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls</a><br>
</blockquote></div>

--000000000000c15d1505b13e38cb--


From nobody Fri Oct  9 08:41:54 2020
Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9653A0D02; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 08:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8K_AXnsV5ssf; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 08:41:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR05-DB8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-db8eur05on2091.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.20.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 674603A0CE5; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 08:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=e9Jiw41NMbGTFCAsh9PQ9MrKrmAS95VvxyBBU6q7y+4CZbZs+mZlYRjWkPRek+d9wIxozldporpnqGQVhjZMhyTord6rYx+o+PN8Gppex/M3lmE3vL9aocQPhe7+GGvNtsK9avRj9rOZ3QlxH3nmvXigmTjbaiR3CNEw4IVS//YTjOvM737bNtx0czM2ruEj0OrCG2HgVPbej/Ev0tLdTe9SDH/I6BFneyrmi0XXNBp0q/cc5wCEBGfjUiPtRSpVOl/NZWReq0j7EgBe0TVSy4nmrkZqwBlIcHkQ0CVo+fDPg3KtsUEv1OfLfDaN7aNfaG0kj8e/aZ0rY9TZ05+Lug==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;  s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=/G1Yy9cNxk4KuY4UrZPdLiEQFU8wKcbYiQcIs/eKnyg=; b=OGmpu4DjCf+FzQ5gk1WkWPD70xW5npaq7BX7jPXJLvEnMA0AwtaWZ784rKXrgZA5Rqn3XtIRegt5PH9auXe4aMPjonko+NdqIt75mLl8dpltKQmHBsIjb95ES60IX/Ao0msk4jcYPafANi7/xSkzTo1JePJogPQppJADN1JedfE8q5bbMyIbEcIgOiJDfmQTbTq7p5toyVmMoacPgHTKzpYw0HovfbpXug6+nk4SLHTPsDZUQJNoMM1oPUr6HymSySccjKhchAzXAfIFuWSLacp/PhEfGOopN0rXv5p7ShoT5XOXXnsW6+mljxSodDF3tNCfGhRu6GeWDSNFAAIFpg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=btconnect.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=btconnect.com; dkim=pass header.d=btconnect.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-btconnect-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=/G1Yy9cNxk4KuY4UrZPdLiEQFU8wKcbYiQcIs/eKnyg=; b=bcFAGVFkCIgi9g4nI41HxK+E1ZeDI77xkgmo9amlWs8guzAEqdqEyTIqkddHoY3yFEqEaJfXJw8e8YeD5B7YghuauMgDRyiYfqR4bRnQgUuzvz9N3nNaRk38nUjMW5vyB99ToELLwpu2W72WnKOsuk/FKk/dx41PcLpb1o/0gWg=
Received: from AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:134::11) by AM6PR07MB5558.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:82::30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3477.11; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:41:41 +0000
Received: from AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::ad44:1086:3767:a804]) by AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::ad44:1086:3767:a804%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3477.011; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:41:41 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Working group last call completed: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
Thread-Index: AdaeF4y+WWxs7eiZQ4aM9uNrryFi/wACHe5rAAyf6GQ=
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:41:41 +0000
Message-ID: <AM7PR07MB624837A8783EE084514DDB79A0080@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <061701d69e17$962f3180$c28d9480$@olddog.co.uk>, <AM7PR07MB6248EC7F6C5B528021C57696A0080@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM7PR07MB6248EC7F6C5B528021C57696A0080@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
authentication-results: olddog.co.uk; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; olddog.co.uk; dmarc=none action=none header.from=btconnect.com; 
x-originating-ip: [86.146.121.140]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 66c1faaa-a10c-4773-5f04-08d86c69d15b
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM6PR07MB5558:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM6PR07MB555866F53B1CDD0C1CA877EBA0080@AM6PR07MB5558.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: tB/xWdLsbT9JJzTdLDFO4BTutkksUPQhuC6qrT6AOnghsie5DhwsnR4Rw3eJasSe0nG4/UkyeVlJx89hA8vFHOVGE+d5M8AeTyLS+cX4m15g7iKBhI1OQqkQB2iSRFxX5ADt3HjxEON+ZukK6K+Pq3wGLkP61CwFk3yOeWuKQG74YL4glrhJsDBocLGZSd/jFmpAOcqL1o6UNJzcPZJVw5DfbffElrKAGccSCTU8rkX94SGbTtXd0o8Hoyd9gQu4iK4HcZl2+85yRs8TSy0SW8/oRDJqTr+RdKDWv4Jl+d/Gi9KKcKOHeSxj0u8OWErGX7lCrOGQa/mOQOEoD5Rtmpqy89Vhdk2eWCJWTqgpT+SGli/S+tBTav3FxKJzBZRwveqy7Hmy6+Mia/CgG/+ujQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:;  IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE;  SFS:(39860400002)(376002)(396003)(136003)(346002)(366004)(4326008)(64756008)(8936002)(9686003)(15650500001)(66476007)(33656002)(71200400001)(2906002)(76116006)(110136005)(91956017)(55016002)(316002)(83080400001)(52536014)(966005)(5660300002)(66946007)(66556008)(26005)(8676002)(83380400001)(478600001)(66446008)(6506007)(186003)(2940100002)(7696005)(53546011)(86362001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; 
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 66c1faaa-a10c-4773-5f04-08d86c69d15b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Oct 2020 15:41:41.1851 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: cCAvm6s+g8DStd8pyHYovzQ56NOtVysJMALeO3pIhQUQWp0SIgQaLk2ZHX9j/We6zpeZyuAl6E1On3li0LUuyg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM6PR07MB5558
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/8IWcA7eLhkVxOGM8PHIYOLbpcUM>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Working group last call completed: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 15:41:53 -0000

From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.=
com>=0A=
Sent: 09 October 2020 10:45=0A=
=0A=
From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddo=
g.co.uk>=0A=
Sent: 09 October 2020 09:38=0A=
=0A=
Authors and working group,=0A=
=0A=
The last call period for this draft has ended.=0A=
=0A=
There was feedback from three people on-list all of whom had comments and=
=0A=
proposals to improve the document.=0A=
=0A=
The authors should address these reviews and produce a new version of the=
=0A=
draft at their convenience.=0A=
=0A=
In the meantime, three comments of support (and none of objection) does not=
=0A=
seem to me like consensus to publish (although it is also not consensus to=
=0A=
not publish). While this is a mainly a process document, and it is clear=0A=
that the WG chairs/secretary support the work (as co-authors), maybe the WG=
=0A=
could express something a little more than complete disinterest.=0A=
=0A=
What about all of you OAM experts? What about the people with code for LSP=
=0A=
Ping?=0A=
=0A=
<tp>=0A=
=0A=
Adrian=0A=
=0A=
If I have understood the document, then it makes no change to LSP Ping prot=
ocol in any way.  It amends the terminology in places to bring it in line w=
ith other WG and changes the ranges available for future allocations with I=
ANA but makes no change to existing allocations or the protocol so I would =
expect most OAM experts and LSP Ping coders say that it is of no interest a=
nd no concern and perhaps not worth an e-mail to say so:-)=0A=
=0A=
I did not comment in detail on the unfamiliar English in the I-D and will a=
wait the new version before doing so; I would not be surprised if there are=
  substantial number of such issues in the new version i.e we could need a =
few more rounds.=0A=
=0A=
<tp2>=0A=
I was too pessimistic - the English in this version looks good.=0A=
=0A=
Tom Petch=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
Please continue sending opinions on the work while the authors are making=
=0A=
the new revision.=0A=
=0A=
Thanks,=0A=
Adrian=0A=
=0A=
-----Original Message-----=0A=
From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel=0A=
Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32=0A=
To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>=0A=
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org=0A=
Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call :=0A=
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04=0A=
=0A=
Hi MPLS WG,=0A=
=0A=
As previously noted, I'm the shepherd for this document and I'm running the=
=0A=
working group last call as agreed by the chairs.=0A=
=0A=
This email starts a two-week last call on=0A=
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04=0A=
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update=
/=0A=
=0A=
Please send your opinions to the mailing list before October 9th.=0A=
=0A=
While yes/no opinions are not without value, it is far more helpful if you=
=0A=
can indicate whether you have read the latest version of the draft, and wha=
t=0A=
the reasons are for your opinions.=0A=
=0A=
Of course, all of your review comments will be helpful in improving the=0A=
document.=0A=
=0A=
Best,=0A=
Adrian=0A=
=0A=
_______________________________________________=0A=
mpls mailing list=0A=
mpls@ietf.org=0A=
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls=0A=
=0A=
_______________________________________________=0A=
mpls mailing list=0A=
mpls@ietf.org=0A=
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls=0A=
=0A=
_______________________________________________=0A=
mpls mailing list=0A=
mpls@ietf.org=0A=
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls=0A=


From nobody Fri Oct  9 09:03:24 2020
Return-Path: <michelg@upperside.fr>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803043A0A6A for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 09:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.003
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eZYPl0A7fSnI for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 09:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 20.mo6.mail-out.ovh.net (20.mo6.mail-out.ovh.net [178.32.124.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 597C63A0A68 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 09:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from player726.ha.ovh.net (unknown [10.108.42.102]) by mo6.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0304722C42B for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 18:03:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from upperside.fr (lfbn-idf3-1-648-85.w86-252.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.252.22.85]) (Authenticated sender: michelg@upperside.fr) by player726.ha.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B97B916EF659D for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri,  9 Oct 2020 16:03:15 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass (GARM-97G002cebe61ed-dfea-4609-832d-0bc9d80cce3e, 97F552A3CD0447138622AB456E6BC5010DE189FC) smtp.auth=michelg@upperside.fr
From: <michelg@upperside.fr>
To: <mpls@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 18:03:15 +0200
Message-ID: <008301d69e55$b2efb130$18cf1390$@upperside.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0084_01D69E66.767992A0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: fr
Thread-Index: AdaeVbG59zcMEeTZRS2CoJ89N+oqFw==
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 9927059479590981722
X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK
X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0
X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrhedugdelkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjpdevjffgvefmvefgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucehtddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufffkfggtgfothesrgdtghepvddtvdenucfhrhhomhepoehmihgthhgvlhhgsehuphhpvghrshhiuggvrdhfrheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepfedtudfgkefftdeuieejkeehffethedtgfehveekgffgveekgeevteffvdffvdegnecuffhomhgrihhnpehuphhpvghrshhiuggvtghonhhfvghrvghntggvshdrtghomhenucfkpheptddrtddrtddrtddpkeeirddvhedvrddvvddrkeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhpqdhouhhtpdhhvghlohepphhlrgihvghrjedviedrhhgrrdhovhhhrdhnvghtpdhinhgvtheptddrtddrtddrtddpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmihgthhgvlhhgsehuphhpvghrshhiuggvrdhfrhdprhgtphhtthhopehmphhlshesihgvthhfrdhorhhg
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/XBfwPoFyCEpWFAP-QELGewvWOEE>
Subject: [mpls] MPLS + SDN + NFV World 2021: new dates, same location
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 16:03:23 -0000

This is a multipart message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0084_01D69E66.767992A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The 22nd Edition of the MPLS + SDN + NFV World Congress has been rescheduled
to September 2021. 

 

The congress will be held from 28th of September to the 1st of October 2021
at the same venue, the Marriott Paris Rive Gauche Hotel & Conference Center.

 

More information soon at:

https://www.uppersideconferences.com/mpls-sdn-nfv/

 

 


------=_NextPart_000_0084_01D69E66.767992A0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" =
xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:dt=3D"uuid:C2F41010-65B3-11d1-A29F-00AA00C14882" =
xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" =
xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta name=3D"Microsoft =
Theme 2.00" content=3D"Network 100"><meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type =
content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"><meta name=3DGenerator =
content=3D"Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
	{font-family:"Cambria Math";
	panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Calibri;
	panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:"Trebuchet MS";
	panose-1:2 11 6 3 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{margin:0cm;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Trebuchet MS",sans-serif;
	color:black;
	mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	color:#009999;
	text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
	{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
	color:black;}
.MsoChpDefault
	{mso-style-type:export-only;
	mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
@page WordSection1
	{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
	margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt;}
div.WordSection1
	{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit">
<o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body bgcolor=3Dwhite lang=3DFR =
link=3D"#009999" vlink=3D"#666699" style=3D'word-wrap:break-word'><div =
class=3DWordSection1><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>The 22nd =
Edition of the MPLS + SDN + NFV World Congress has been rescheduled to =
September 2021. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:=
p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>The congress =
will be held from 28th of September to the 1st of October 2021 at the =
same venue, the Marriott Paris Rive Gauche Hotel &amp; Conference =
Center.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:=
p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>More =
information soon at:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'><a =
href=3D"https://www.uppersideconferences.com/mpls-sdn-nfv/">https://www.u=
ppersideconferences.com/mpls-sdn-nfv/</a><o:p></o:p></span></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-US><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p></div></body></html>
------=_NextPart_000_0084_01D69E66.767992A0--


From nobody Tue Oct 13 08:08:41 2020
Return-Path: <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137423A08BD; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 08:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.313
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.313 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.213, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6aIy0nJg5YH2; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 08:08:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR04-VI1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr80105.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.8.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 813903A08B8; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 08:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=S/RTjpKs3mSYNNoVCROafYHFLkrIRIxtzFNmicyqQiaTMtZ6ncY/as+BK15iOfFFKbsSg1HC5jCWiqvis+vd8RfizgCA6CqCo4DBtLMFenG2VhSlktwMHqu7ZlmohRxXE8KbuuxNtXg4+3pqfVaPR6peK50qkzJqPWOK/Z5d8fVxIi4T2dsIkbA+OyrmZ3Z/T8BRU9xmS08IXQWcQjsAS5zseYOdkT7ADccGAkXo9l/T9PKt8Th9RryG+IxiD0b+sZjp9buRr8LRSLEZPmWD3aBe9TXQtMYhWV4/ShD+/g1a3BnM+XpRZBillKGaI5XS7B+c69OP7wCCOI8md3E/Pg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;  s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=eIyF2t083xaz6FZgBToarXPiPv8y1rb6w/VoOT+MVYQ=; b=BKPyx/Mdf6YhVJ+5sg0ToTokboQ/Ke2CjZFKLqnZX3cvRIYzAfGiLZ3YEpDQ1F3m6yEBizB+H6E9xajzoT3AMZzQATSje+dQcuJ0W7n8d2KC4O26PVZl7BGOCQJYR6EsYK4Gdr5j6nMR6YKG3/BsyedLzhFHQ09Eosp7eivO8qkwNjyrFYpaEC3FErmTd3SzoyMj/8ItYgq8BzZwjijz8tXzYBIT6DeD0wT7ZSVa/otpeI2+hmVL/Nv7SXYjOJxtTPs4130N/KH9PPH8vTVJmPaqtZfngYfpyENpT+z6HYrK+35BPbnwwY63HnMvJMPb4rN648uZgfmQgboAbKh6ew==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nokia.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nokia.com; dkim=pass header.d=nokia.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com;  s=selector1-nokia-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=eIyF2t083xaz6FZgBToarXPiPv8y1rb6w/VoOT+MVYQ=; b=s1CrXBBAhLVSw7LVKwYBxcqM+DTVIX5uZhk32RN5C1qvkjh5/WjCLE688nYY0Cd9GR/r4yY/21coQ+1hIB+rCYYlzTDTS0WJdmdAQZC9h/yidd3NvcEqNk5/JA/CIjrPsWC/hbWH8Mql44jLkK6OTB2Hbgh5BArRBMhktjUkmh8=
Authentication-Results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=nokia.com;
Received: from AM7PR07MB6438.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:132::19) by AM6PR07MB5224.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:60::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3477.11; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:08:33 +0000
Received: from AM7PR07MB6438.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::38de:3985:486e:7ac1]) by AM7PR07MB6438.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::38de:3985:486e:7ac1%2]) with mapi id 15.20.3477.019; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:08:33 +0000
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, adrian@olddog.co.uk, 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
References: <00d001d698d4$f1bca890$d535f9b0$@olddog.co.uk> <2bd58cc3-4995-8346-cb77-ae0d81fe355d@nokia.com> <1627b4bd-972e-f65e-747f-259897586d91@pi.nu>
From: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
Message-ID: <cf5b69b1-c04e-1bb8-9f69-d7564f435800@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 17:08:30 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
In-Reply-To: <1627b4bd-972e-f65e-747f-259897586d91@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [131.228.2.20]
X-ClientProxiedBy: HE1PR0902CA0015.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:3:e5::25) To AM7PR07MB6438.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:132::19)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Received: from [172.30.2.230] (131.228.2.20) by HE1PR0902CA0015.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:3:e5::25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3477.20 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:08:33 +0000
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-HT: Tenant
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: cd66817b-12aa-4a08-2380-08d86f89da57
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: AM6PR07MB5224:
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <AM6PR07MB522450EF5DF03E02BC6CD68C8C040@AM6PR07MB5224.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:7219;
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: yYq9l2v9CGsIRxzCxmKuwudTsWHv8I7g3X6aIlUD//zxnYpxvXancd5WeYJ+Y5yvMPSnh7+EvNz2Zh1hzC1gV2baWFZeR53NCt5HTT+00g5VmTboitln0/5sRepjG3l3kX8s5AjDLZF8TlsbEUBrGZfLDivQUVAJvKi0YWypFV/gIpAZ7MguqW41RIUyV9guxCNcFVcicG6tZ52zLF/Hnyj/HgKrOoUHZgwYhrBb5129SLf+enTCXw9BlU/mGeuKgcshPe1js1CIoQPjWMG3qOQ48si8UINoNy5OnIhbLdBdD1TdLVeQXo5NlFxotT9h4jB/q2r0u9Dfv8lFMQfm1t/4WQZoeFXjwHKEuerwaKnwHrbRFPf+B1XBnQbqsTGGuHQzgyBU7izxZrR6Dpd+4srFqDta4EMHJYYLNaY0IycVD0OLx/OTZxRCBH6cpdVSmgH051IPWbHn1dMx7wdUJg==
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:;  IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:AM7PR07MB6438.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE;  SFS:(4636009)(396003)(376002)(366004)(39860400002)(346002)(136003)(83380400001)(44832011)(16576012)(31686004)(956004)(2616005)(2906002)(83080400001)(186003)(52116002)(66574015)(15650500001)(110136005)(53546011)(26005)(16526019)(36756003)(66556008)(478600001)(8936002)(8676002)(6486002)(966005)(86362001)(31696002)(316002)(5660300002)(66946007)(66476007)(4326008)(43740500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; 
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 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
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: cd66817b-12aa-4a08-2380-08d86f89da57
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM7PR07MB6438.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Oct 2020 15:08:33.8187 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: HQy9wPyEpQ215xAoibk7KI5pA8idlFZhsqupeiqVgTsWtvMyh0I0ZwHwWmqYP0Sn5RIDcESGK8ibVCqxegiZmv8/Za9ssM6vZibpaQiTz74=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM6PR07MB5224
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/R-E-ouMp0a8TqmuON5lWXdpFaEI>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:08:40 -0000

Loa,

please see in-line.

-m

Le 2020-10-09 à 9:46, Loa Andersson a écrit :
> Martin,
> 
> Thanks for the support! I have started preparing version-05 of this 
> document.
> 
> I have included the first version of my working copy, mostly to show 
> what I have done and so that commenters can check how their comments
> have been addressed.
> 
> I have addressed most of your comments, but left a few question in this 
> mail. And will addressed the faulty registry ranges together with the 
> comments from Tom on the same subject.
> 
> Thanks for taking the time.
> 
> 
> On 05/10/2020 06:03, Martin Vigoureux wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I should read the docs in my queue instead but ...
>>
>>        a sub-registry is used when a code point allocated in a registry
>>        need code points scoped by that or a set of code points.
>> this is a bit hard to parse. at least s/need/needs/
> 
> I have fixed the s/need/needs/
> 
> But I would be happy to get some help with this, what is there now is 
> the third or fourth iteration
> 
> What about:
> 
>         a sub-registry is used when a code point, or a set of code
>         points allocated in a single registry, needs "sub-code points"
>         scoped by the code point or the set of code points.
> 
> Any help appreciated.
either is fine. IMO s/need/needs/ made me understand the sentence so the 
new iteration is not particularly needed.

> 
> 
>>
>>
>>     The range of each TLV and sub-TLV registry is divided into two
>>     blocks, one with a range from 0 to 32767 for TLVs and sub-TLVs that
>>     require a response if not recognized.  The other block has the range
>>     from 32768 to 65535 for TLVs and sub-TLVs that may be silently
>>     dropped, stepped over or an error message sent, if not recognized.
> 
>> this seems like saying exactly the same thing than what the two bullet 
>> points above (in the draft) say.
> 
> Yes I think you are right, the text and bullets have converged over 
> time; should I drop the text or the bullets?
I'd keep the bullets but you are the editor.
>>
>>
>> In:
>>     o  If the unrecognized TLV or sub-TLV is from the Experimental Use
>>        range (37140-37143) or from the FCFS range (31744-32767) a the
>>        Return Code of 2 ("One or more of the TLVs was not understood")
>>        will be sent in the echo response.
>> and in the table of:
>> 3.2.  Common Registration Procedures for TLVs and sub-TLVs
>>
>>     37140-37143 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned
>> is the range correct?
>> shouldn't it be 31740-31743?
>> BTW, This table doesn't have a number like all other. May be you 
>> should call it Table 1 (and renumber all other).
> 
> yes - you are right. However, Tom have listed morer of the same, I will 
> do a separate spin and update all the ranges
ok
>>
>>
>> Section 2 says:
>>     o  In the listing of assiged code points the term "Vendor Private
>>        Use" is changed to "Private Use"
> 
> .
> Yes - this is correct. The Message Types, Reply Modes and Return Codes 
> registries (section 2) keep the Private Use" registration policies.
> Note: I wanted to chage this to FCFS, but since range was only 4 
> possible allocation, and this is to small for an FCFS range, we kept the 
> Private Use regostrion policy.
>> but 3.3.1 says:
>>     o  In the listing of assignments the term "Vendor Private Use" is
>>        changed to "First Come First Served (FCFS)".
> 
> Yes - that is section 3 that discusses the TLVs and sub-TLVs (that have 
> sufficient space for a FCFS registrion policy). So this is correct.
>>
>> note there are other differences:
>>     o  A note "Not to be assigned" is added for the registration
>>        procedures "Private Use" and "Experimental Use".
>>     o  A note saying "Not to be assigned" is added for the registration
>>        procedures "Experimental Use".
> 
> Correct for the same reason as above.
>>
>>     o  In the lists that capture the assignment status, the fields that
>>        are reserved, i.e.  0 (zero), Private Use and Experimental Use are
>>        clearly marked as such.
>>     o  In the list that captures assignment status, the fields that are
>>        reserved, i.e.  0 (zero) and Experimental Use are clearly marked.
>> Not sure whether they are intentional.
>>
> This is correst for the same reason as above
ok
>> >
>>     Some referenced RFCs use the concept "mandatory TLVs" and "mandatory
>>     sub-TLVs" to indicate that, if a TLV or sub-TLV of the range 0-16383
>>     or 16384-31743 in a message is not understood, an error message needs
>>     to be sent in response.
>> RFC 8029 talks about mandatory TLVs for a range up to 32767:
>>     Types less than 32768 (i.e., with the high-order bit equal to 0) are
>>     mandatory TLVs
>> BTW you says that clearly in 4.1, so I think this should be consistent 
>> here.
>>
> So you say that this would be better
> 
>      Some referenced RFCs use the concept "mandatory TLVs" and "mandatory
>      sub-TLVs" to indicate that, if a TLV or sub-TLV of the range 0-32767
>      in a message is not understood, an error message needs to be sent in
>      response.
yes
>>
>> You say:
>>     The Value field contains the TLVs, including sub-TLVs, that were
>>     not understood, encoded as sub-TLVs.
>> But 8209 was saying:
>>     The Value field contains the TLVs that were not understood, encoded
>>     as sub-TLVs.
>> This is not only a "removing mandatory" change. you seem to now impose 
>> that sub-TLVs be sent. Is that the intent?
>>
> 
> I think my text is correct, RFC 8029 is a bit vague. But RFC 8029 
> implies that a TLV that includes a unrecognized sub-TLV an error message 
> should be sent. But you need to return the entire TLV (with its 
> sub-TLVs). If you return  the sub-TLV only the might be several sub-TLVs 
> in the message that has the same type. You need the entire TLV for context.
ok
> 
>>
>> In Tables 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 20
>>     | 37140-37144 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
>>     | 31748-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>> are these ranges correct?
>> shouldn't they be
>>     | 31740-31743 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
>>     | 31744-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for TLVs anf sub- |
>>
> Probably not, I'll check this as when I take care of  the corresponding 
> comments from Tom.
do you mean that they are probably not correct or that my suggestion is 
probably not correct?
>>
>> Nits:
>> s/This docuemtment/This document/                       + (+-sign 
>> means that it is fixed)
>> s/An exasmple/An example/                               +
>> s/contaimer for regiistries/container for registries/   +
>> s/sunregistry/sub-registry/                             +
>> s/assiged/assigned/                                     - (fixed 
>> becasue of another comment)
>> s/range for "RFC Required" range/"RFC Required" range/  +
>> s/i.e.  0/i.e., 0/ (2 occurences)                       + (sometimes I 
>> wish I understood how
>                                                               to use the 
> comma in English :)).
>> s/registry [IANA-RC] registry/registry [IANA-RC]/       +
>> s/sennt/sent/                                           - (fixed 
>> becasue of another comment) s/First come, first served/First Come 
>> First Served/     +
>> s/defintions/definitions/                               +
>> s/Experimetal Use/Experimental Use/                     +
>> s/a the/a/                                              +
>> s/srange (64508-64511).  or/range (64508-64511) or/     +
>> s/sub- TLVs/sub-TLVs/                                   +
>> s/TLVs an sub/TLVs and sub/                             +
>> s/TLVs anf sub/TLVs and sub/                            +
>> s/First Come Frst Served (FCFS)/First Come First Served (FCFS)/   +
>> s/Experiemental Use/Experimental Use/                   +
>> s/The first set are/The first set is/                   +
>> s/the second set are/the second set is/                 +
>> s/the range there the/the range of/?
> The sentence say:
>      the second set is for the
>      range there the TLV or sub-TLV that may be silently
>      dropped if not recognized.
> What about:
> 
>      the second set is for the
>      range there the TLV or sub-TLV may be silently
>      dropped if not recognized.
> 
> Changed. Comment?
hmmmm, not sure to understand what you mean here.

> 
>> s/The text in those two paragraphs are/The text in those two 
>> paragraphs is/  +
>> s/resereved/reserved/ (9 occurences)                 +
>> s/Four code point has/Four code points have/ (3 occurences)    +
>> s/Two small sets, 4 code points each, has/Two small sets, 4 code 
>> points each, have/ (7 occurences)   +
>> s/recognised/recognized/     +
>>
>>
>> beyond that, I support this document moving forward.
> 
> Martin, tnx!!
> 
> /Loa
>>
>> -m
>>
>> Le 2020-10-02 à 17:59, Adrian Farrel a écrit :
>>> I know this is not the most exciting document the working group has ever
>>> produced, but as shepherd I need to see some comments and expressions of
>>> support.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Adrian
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
>>> Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32
>>> To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
>>> Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
>>> Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call :
>>> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
>>>
>>> Hi MPLS WG,
>>>
>>> As previously noted, I'm the shepherd for this document and I'm 
>>> running the
>>> working group last call as agreed by the chairs.
>>>
>>> This email starts a two-week last call on
>>> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update/ 
>>>
>>>
>>> Please send your opinions to the mailing list before October 9th.
>>>
>>> While yes/no opinions are not without value, it is far more helpful 
>>> if you
>>> can indicate whether you have read the latest version of the draft, 
>>> and what
>>> the reasons are for your opinions.
>>>
>>> Of course, all of your review comments will be helpful in improving the
>>> document.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Adrian
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpls mailing list
>>> mpls@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpls mailing list
>>> mpls@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 


From nobody Fri Oct 16 07:59:22 2020
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD953A0F96; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 07:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82n0FpjORXm8; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 07:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com (mail-lf1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12F263A0F93; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 07:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id l28so3292909lfp.10; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 07:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;  h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=S18vxW/EZB3lUK/Lw0vvK/FXR4ts6s0keR0rA8N224k=; b=mj9tVmt1+CfFeawZ4cCJARF8pwhFaEV8zRCwfmFJgAo78r6kgIFmCyIFmKjDx7JD3C PlyueDrZePu2YGhOShmLmiK5SCAGRrKWKWTFpT8Ug+RZpXYZdr0W6puByFcIxZJyYFQI XXV//CdMCAPbnzBYkxtOpkOGGAYsrKSjrK4YbXICmjJHITAcvIEuoDMS1+oK+CXVkeOP kXbrQSg5SdzZaIwUjuLum+WUZL+c+EKZHmgen0gKIxCcTTpobCc6QL9PripcFg91Fz+O dK6evYWhtjWCwvw1XdUzFB9TB/a76WAH3J9FGDFBLEAPi3jPPdmvA74vVyediNSxVCow mqiQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=S18vxW/EZB3lUK/Lw0vvK/FXR4ts6s0keR0rA8N224k=; b=f1JEAzJZ1RvetfBy5/hklJV69EejRM219JiWp4UMf7/372IIthjaNXSHf5GzcgBZcD ajzQ623XRMywLm1SFQWIF08iuj2D/QCL5dEo/52EXjGtH4BhZUJkn/S6XHRXxI7RMZfY dKF+lA+7HVAKCSleM5liYSKGizqGKW7eVqLKIZQqe07DxrT/JoiDVpvoir/xMUrQccOf uzZx2nyHNLkwzVR/PRe4ditTDA9yQ3h/RJV7jQ0HCBzVrDRnac3dR9HXRrLSf9lln+Bm /NGRONa+2gij0E89bShTSrnIfIQNTN418ZlpL5YS0wNLcvjCasvXs1iy5e7EPRETs7mA Fcmw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532WVoQRixB4E97KFJt6JzCZCC29fEryCLr1Yitg19BuHFQcQYGv bw92p9J0HGJrvVqgSfCELMH3qJn1dDE04ivquMeJI36g
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx5I5i28idiKFWVobhFqe2weOVG1M7sdzkIbas+J1OBLFegAUQb8YEO/HU0cwvee7NPR6hTm1fJBW9TA2T1iDY=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:529:: with SMTP id o9mr1437023lfc.331.1602860356625;  Fri, 16 Oct 2020 07:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 07:59:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmViLvqf6hZzsB704MC95fdYc36v7tb96itzHWaGeLaRKw@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology@ietf.org
Cc: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002e6a4105b1cb02a6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/1LB4n-NDNYHAbDm2aEctHTx1Mps>
Subject: [mpls] Intended status of draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 14:59:21 -0000

--0000000000002e6a4105b1cb02a6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Dear Authors,
hope you can clarify the intended status of the draft. I've noticed that
the datatracker reflects it as Informational while the document itself
states that is on the Standards track. As I understand RFC 2026 a document
is either on Standards or non-Standards, e.g., Informational track.
Thank you in advance.

Regards,
Greg

--0000000000002e6a4105b1cb02a6
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Dear Authors,<div>hope you can clarify the intended status=
 of the draft. I&#39;ve noticed that the datatracker reflects it as Informa=
tional while the document itself states that is on the Standards track. As =
I understand RFC 2026 a document is either on Standards or non-Standards, e=
.g., Informational track.</div><div>Thank you in advance.</div><div><br></d=
iv><div>Regards,</div><div>Greg</div></div>

--0000000000002e6a4105b1cb02a6--


From nobody Fri Oct 16 10:33:33 2020
Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D443A0A24; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L5fXyxkmawWx; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 552283A0A26; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id y12so3841068wrp.6; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;  h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=gjEcuja2ZR2PhI0P3BFYdxjfmKN4SkrB5hLFJZdOOVs=; b=Ni9iL2E6Z32/bD8ObGs2Ad4US9CL5TaOGo3cKtacgHmSQl5MItGKPX5EZirOy8hNn2 MFWSDQQjjRXNibOFL7kkRXQb3nVvXAUj5auYGWfwL5FKdass7FDgXnSecSZsnwQn2yDB PDt0OqI5eVER+D8K1xoXz3P1UvobfoRLbirCoFKxfnPs5kHRRlzPJ0q5akUxGl+gS3Mh HEXhtrKSe85cLtQDy2kPBVw9Izan73vKF4W2aHDmwKaDAnPsuRsdGQKM/3SCbYl7tT22 tlydLnla6yj8rgzvaSMYwM2YH6naD/K1SCrzPKNjlc7PHL4imHGiV0WN+yaz2BGcQWIu 8aJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=gjEcuja2ZR2PhI0P3BFYdxjfmKN4SkrB5hLFJZdOOVs=; b=NWmcHVxufwZbNZPw0fmUOM5kvLdBW7CBIeOaf2r6nvqwzS+bT8zHfdZid41p5mwRv7 IQxSpg0AqfTtTfHSVtSyuvDgQ3Pbegw/CUhMfdXWKqiEIMTxcKC7WdGIN4l+f5aVdZbV iN0EeHEi/3piBqhC3zcoztG76XF2Qf3mnNirKZTXxJPdCde72nrntysz+rD3xqB7/XjZ e6pRleePGzfOZgb5A3Rq2MfnWhQ86dIGZJ8KTHRmPSrwg09MJk0/AhGi25Bzb8awXJ3v SnWOxJHXrq1wdJJeIElKNNi88avjcbX9COzHdE1nAa6TSaM83iiLawT0+8ycC02oz4l4 3dMg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532hJJi7FZ9Uw93pK3BYShOR3z8OuWGtU4RQWmIVtz3c1dA1bL0/ WY5Nv7/tZGvJVqazC4X/ozGm9wssL10=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwB3Q9Ms/T0hqEtuAGYUMRArsd8KkeTalWOuWtf2mTs6YBNYq39ZB8/PE2XwxLuHuH5wzDfjg==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6551:: with SMTP id z17mr5230930wrv.266.1602869608579;  Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from broadband.bt.com ([2a00:23c5:3395:c901:7884:d45a:be26:2f04]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r3sm4330080wrm.51.2020.10.16.10.33.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:33:27 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmViLvqf6hZzsB704MC95fdYc36v7tb96itzHWaGeLaRKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 18:33:27 +0100
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology@ietf.org, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B60F8567-DFA1-4414-A663-C150D4B199D9@gmail.com>
References: <CA+RyBmViLvqf6hZzsB704MC95fdYc36v7tb96itzHWaGeLaRKw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/NDvbCjJHrjE5XWZL5KcUnghFSBA>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Intended status of draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 17:33:32 -0000

Greg

It updates an ST RFC so it has to be ST.

I think the draft is right (it changed) but the shepherd forgot to =
update the tracker.

- Stewart

> On 16 Oct 2020, at 15:59, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> Dear Authors,
> hope you can clarify the intended status of the draft. I've noticed =
that the datatracker reflects it as Informational while the document =
itself states that is on the Standards track. As I understand RFC 2026 a =
document is either on Standards or non-Standards, e.g., Informational =
track.
> Thank you in advance.
>=20
> Regards,
> Greg
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls


From nobody Fri Oct 16 10:42:05 2020
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E2B3A09E9; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PlaMOpJ9WBv8; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34DD23A0A2B; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id a9so3964146lfc.7; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;  h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VQ5cuj5TvOT9tilHumw57PMsppxFVQAbuibUC2wbGBo=; b=NM9wFqhUWtw9seIRRBBn8eeBfQrHeOst6QZRRWEP9Ye8emS3SDtACTkdMBxoma3A2a Wm4GKZnIKJXmMmWqhVEilich/Awk+QIQmSIR9nremZhkFlVLrxc1npB0cgsYXzyi1xkZ ZEtqtOX53zozn9eqkfZ28wZhBcknCse3CttDcTEHRV3VArYNnvJWy45IteFyj1e0JxOt MJ2hJvSJS26fIpIfvC78x9pFhymKNvGIU8257kMXxfIc6UAgr34zZvKshQeoxq48o0OB DiVe0qKMrNsePzAoPXbzqQSWeyAwdutlGioI6lZqTH9LbRGGuEPrFzXr5KllSLdKBstn jAfA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VQ5cuj5TvOT9tilHumw57PMsppxFVQAbuibUC2wbGBo=; b=qIAFAR2zVsZ6nUWh1Ng81bN7W6RokzAQFtMf6Te8VHW3RIyOAh0fESvyIc8cBcL9sl 3LxVKJUBqOfb+ynOJppelgQOZANqylxlzXzgsimg0Rlu7oyHUIOP55pcVmLQyFEL35b8 w3WWSGtWoc4s7p2uWlp6VtqZ8qpc1y37S2rZFyoZR/H9d3RRaCaIowogcTaU2TkJdR+m kxXjYH9zqyIzyLbrZWdfMDNwmcg3+TD58PopfL/+yCS677aRtZlEPMWbWGqN7zj249nn P/1WiNDkB8+MXy/gOz9m0MCN3P3sj0Yl+iKkmZomvGYWG/EAR21S2Y2FkPjtcZXo7Tri vx/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532naZ58ACiXFhOhSHtmuwZAkxOAlPOrvDZqGfMeTue7Ro4VP/mM aWQtYfBNVS9smxlZIzgFbIf+eGMAeimiZK6PkIA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwmvdmJ3sSb1lAIEQjy8E0F8+xfUm2pWvbSHNXheK7f+kUn8JaeWJmJpBejfojRTLWokDBNa5TCmRT9gRF/mDo=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:c6d6:: with SMTP id w205mr1964439lff.94.1602870120324;  Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+RyBmViLvqf6hZzsB704MC95fdYc36v7tb96itzHWaGeLaRKw@mail.gmail.com> <B60F8567-DFA1-4414-A663-C150D4B199D9@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <B60F8567-DFA1-4414-A663-C150D4B199D9@gmail.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:44:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmXoP9_5by6yTsqQL583F_9-o0dg9Fn4vKV0N-gzGmNR4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology@ietf.org, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000024a30105b1cd4869"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/Ojh4tQ591Rabile_X9VaFNMU0cg>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Intended status of draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 17:42:04 -0000

--00000000000024a30105b1cd4869
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi Stewart,
thank you for the quick response. It makes sense. I was a bit puzzled.

Regards,
Greg

On Fri, Oct 16, 2020, 10:33 Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrote:

> Greg
>
> It updates an ST RFC so it has to be ST.
>
> I think the draft is right (it changed) but the shepherd forgot to update
> the tracker.
>
> - Stewart
>
> > On 16 Oct 2020, at 15:59, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Authors,
> > hope you can clarify the intended status of the draft. I've noticed that
> the datatracker reflects it as Informational while the document itself
> states that is on the Standards track. As I understand RFC 2026 a document
> is either on Standards or non-Standards, e.g., Informational track.
> > Thank you in advance.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Greg
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpls mailing list
> > mpls@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
>

--00000000000024a30105b1cd4869
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto">Hi Stewart,<div dir=3D"auto">thank you for the quick=C2=
=A0response. It makes sense. I was a bit puzzled.=C2=A0</div><div dir=3D"au=
to"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Regards,</div><div dir=3D"auto">Greg</div><=
/div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">O=
n Fri, Oct 16, 2020, 10:33 Stewart Bryant &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:stewart.bry=
ant@gmail.com">stewart.bryant@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote=
 class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc soli=
d;padding-left:1ex">Greg<br>
<br>
It updates an ST RFC so it has to be ST.<br>
<br>
I think the draft is right (it changed) but the shepherd forgot to update t=
he tracker.<br>
<br>
- Stewart<br>
<br>
&gt; On 16 Oct 2020, at 15:59, Greg Mirsky &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:gregimirsk=
y@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noreferrer">gregimirsky@gmail.com</a>=
&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Dear Authors,<br>
&gt; hope you can clarify the intended status of the draft. I&#39;ve notice=
d that the datatracker reflects it as Informational while the document itse=
lf states that is on the Standards track. As I understand RFC 2026 a docume=
nt is either on Standards or non-Standards, e.g., Informational track.<br>
&gt; Thank you in advance.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Regards,<br>
&gt; Greg<br>
&gt; _______________________________________________<br>
&gt; mpls mailing list<br>
&gt; <a href=3D"mailto:mpls@ietf.org" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noreferrer">=
mpls@ietf.org</a><br>
&gt; <a href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls" rel=3D"noreferr=
er noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls=
</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>

--00000000000024a30105b1cd4869--


From nobody Fri Oct 16 10:42:57 2020
Return-Path: <kireeti@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81183A0A16; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.297
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.297 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=BG0xiEDl; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=XZ7YUrU4
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MR_mZOsghnsE; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 173E13A09E9; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108156.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 09GHRskU006974; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:42:54 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=Zxe1Mccj+16sQZa3gpY8fCgBbcCqkuRefgRprpe5Weg=; b=BG0xiEDlZ96KzgwGMJneSrE0idkBhOtXcY7PDRyPshzFJzoYyyP2g1FgglViI/km+29V EzA88OQzwWgM8qwV+xNJsGR+T5ahjN8LJBwHxhpMIUYJrpmsKOHtNJ59rfJzk6Q4eDd+ zdMTIhjI6q9zASNHG8ii6fGjexfM/dIDsUvpVioevHXJy2pi8WDV3za51Y5c//cCFSm7 ex7jLF2OzYLXVZ1ctN72Xxo0Hk2aGhFc0rvkiInr88f7v9RjwBp8EAOBn37cdS20Rdzm qme+vCgLcErpSfIthS6GdfSxfErDLLIwd2aHuC4UhQcuUBMSDqLYOlL3REFdXDIklTAm Vg== 
Received: from nam10-dm6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam10lp2106.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.58.106]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3473mx15tf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:42:54 -0700
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=hu/vs9Mvoxglm9mqYdFYIgkDW0bsN1vpvxpOEtoS7pwCOS8nhic58yrvjX7d3Y56qlSIVatGT6mRK738SAY5YX/4stnkBTYH9NxkaDCRZcFeEICQmW6hDjE5ZnlTOm3VI19cEJ0bnfz3leopQqHaqSfmBMOe5Tm5YkC4Mq+VwNxCt3xDi9Y1oRftVXKEs/38cgitkOef+0VYvJEX2hSgQKkmsqmI9RiVyssLd7qdqaIkREi08GZ7nbIqb7bIR8f+XcwOoc7pDLUoY7t4EKBN9RXZteIC57jPlM+vPO/QpuHaDNYWv2Fy2R1XXgCqB0pDtSswJq3T307As5Kzkn+VnQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;  s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Zxe1Mccj+16sQZa3gpY8fCgBbcCqkuRefgRprpe5Weg=; b=RdKlQZO5s3zMM1T+OPiA9rbuoZZMyVdT6MajORUrUWpIY+8nwafrouX4/Mx2TSzcu/74oWGeVBXk36ox6ksozN/KzYh8fazfEWta7QxEtgZ2Z+wT3n5rLsxJCioGpm6Dg/IME/QvKVKvIiS97xOL53ztuTBmFOuafP/9un4YY0AhitoL9CnvX7hQ1SIsqQzHN+nLuyPOxgE0LxGjVfxtXFf4iUq68W4vA1ccIy6qsPXy2sAl4fcOIgKoiKeQytrgLQLftS00wG3kPtaTvkvx9WRWcQdp2KPpWiTK224qhMW7rFcvDKxBjjM/8Zi3ptWkxcbEpXftmSg474ba65b6qw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Zxe1Mccj+16sQZa3gpY8fCgBbcCqkuRefgRprpe5Weg=; b=XZ7YUrU4N9/D313fsfWW4QUz2tpNyiG8X0SVbLFwREvQDkK+2Ch0iaZKbCmQjRgDWjqzNOBaWTq5HAHNs0d+V4uPmw7kmkj/vHUul+TuHy3iGQHhLs7cRVBbt+3JwEYP01JR1wJMvy3vjXWKLCyWe1YPkykcGELKwIwGs28ChOY=
Received: from BYAPR05MB4565.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a02:f0::26) by BY5PR05MB6994.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:1c3::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3477.11; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 17:42:52 +0000
Received: from BYAPR05MB4565.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c85d:bc82:bef0:173e]) by BYAPR05MB4565.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c85d:bc82:bef0:173e%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3477.019; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 17:42:51 +0000
From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
CC: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology@ietf.org>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Intended status of draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology
Thread-Index: AQHWo8zvNR0de6On3k2EXUcxB1Lm36mafU+AgAACoIA=
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 17:42:51 +0000
Message-ID: <1DB71E60-917C-4EA6-B305-53AD14CA1846@juniper.net>
References: <CA+RyBmViLvqf6hZzsB704MC95fdYc36v7tb96itzHWaGeLaRKw@mail.gmail.com> <B60F8567-DFA1-4414-A663-C150D4B199D9@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <B60F8567-DFA1-4414-A663-C150D4B199D9@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.242.12]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0e0c2f0a-4d7c-46d9-3d4f-08d871fae7f0
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY5PR05MB6994:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY5PR05MB69943B16B44E363826D5BB1AB9030@BY5PR05MB6994.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: K7d184L/WQ15U6E4+009sa+XSU7gPHz8QRA/olmvZHJ6XOay1p8aVLYug1lUfNqIRifecpGBidhrYIayWvkFc8momg5xzg2gIEBhJHGEmkDzwn+qTzKyK/X2ogmcxJwS06PtifjXnhEJvcflep9H2yTeXLh2GiOrKjvZD93hCItrVbCEJERR+jzPRyGjYSi25oJpWgvFBI3Kl9hlNfa1Uswtpu8Ot7KirfLHTcPLls3GeD5dBOg2X2888LzFmnx75ynPyXDjq88SOVkUPJ0e4vnSwqQRy2d4iQt4FFVd9mEjj0rGxhEdtqHYNFS9ujsczah8JbLaUbq/eza3bj2jHJtUPmSYeVm8ROdw01afpmKKZikFmTG/udz9LQE9GHJ/CGuUii/h4cGWHmgbjULkoA==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:;  IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BYAPR05MB4565.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE;  SFS:(4636009)(366004)(376002)(346002)(396003)(39860400002)(136003)(64756008)(4326008)(71200400001)(66446008)(2616005)(66556008)(76116006)(66946007)(478600001)(316002)(33656002)(91956017)(53546011)(8676002)(966005)(6486002)(2906002)(5660300002)(66476007)(26005)(6506007)(36756003)(86362001)(6512007)(54906003)(6916009)(186003)(83380400001)(4744005)(8936002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; 
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <6B4CE47905DFB4439D8ECB4E468A6A81@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BYAPR05MB4565.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 0e0c2f0a-4d7c-46d9-3d4f-08d871fae7f0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Oct 2020 17:42:51.8409 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: w5qV2SseO/Ys3vKaXjYa8b0qCenOenzD84oo9nYSdhtNJ7v2+21rh9JBqhln9Wurhz9pB83/+lVQG81E9PHrLw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY5PR05MB6994
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-10-16_09:2020-10-16, 2020-10-16 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1011 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2010160130
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/rzvFh7OI7kloOFSwgsNeMheUQRU>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Intended status of draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 17:42:57 -0000

+1

> On Oct 16, 2020, at 10:33, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrot=
e:
>=20
> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
>=20
>=20
> Greg
>=20
> It updates an ST RFC so it has to be ST.
>=20
> I think the draft is right (it changed) but the shepherd forgot to update=
 the tracker.
>=20
> - Stewart
>=20
>> On 16 Oct 2020, at 15:59, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
>>=20
>> Dear Authors,
>> hope you can clarify the intended status of the draft. I've noticed that=
 the datatracker reflects it as Informational while the document itself sta=
tes that is on the Standards track. As I understand RFC 2026 a document is =
either on Standards or non-Standards, e.g., Informational track.
>> Thank you in advance.
>>=20
>> Regards,
>> Greg
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls__=
;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!XL3xxWE9jRDWjFSwNAPmSoSueZWx6vyFvPy6aUYQfLd1wsBhSRQNr_fQxXyJ=
1H8$
>=20


From nobody Sun Oct 18 12:02:48 2020
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A420B3A0975; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 12:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.20.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: mpls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <160304776163.11381.1951646908326839733@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 12:02:41 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/RXRU3kP0QMqP6S9deV61v-B20RE>
Subject: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd-11.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 19:02:42 -0000

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG of the IETF.

        Title           : BFD for Multipoint Networks over Point-to-Multi-Point MPLS LSP
        Authors         : Greg Mirsky
                          Gyan Mishra
	Filename        : draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd-11.txt
	Pages           : 10
	Date            : 2020-10-18

Abstract:
   This document describes procedures for using Bidirectional Forwarding
   Detection (BFD) for multipoint networks to detect data plane failures
   in Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) point-to-multipoint (p2mp)
   Label Switched Paths (LSPs) using active tails with unsolicited
   notifications mode.  It also describes the applicability of LSP Ping,
   as in-band, and the control plane, as out-band, solutions to
   bootstrap a BFD session in this environment.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd-11
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd-11

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd-11


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/



From nobody Sun Oct 18 12:14:48 2020
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D9F3A098D; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 12:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.196
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f9vpLyc9aLcW; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 12:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ECD43A098B; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 12:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id l28so10741494lfp.10; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 12:14:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;  h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;  bh=wyq9o6CLe/CWysVsxMMwXv5M0jvT+Y6UcWbtaax+h84=; b=ay/jWD88+vc6xKpwJ6hZ6OkPtMdUQomJXqISV329ml2MlihUvHXiM8CysI/QSUk7EX Yfd68SHPWoUYOwipN6PPpZ6iitGD2yAv4Fftbi3I/s3Oc0cdhxIhI/9CavQSPiuT4pXu QnLn/9YjDBzy0imin96Q1Od9XiE7cbz7NxETHkgDgkWfD0hKlPOxsGLLOghGCNgtPts8 ZSnQNksbVyYSB7wn9qyeDgU53uZV9cfPlG7V+LBjcc+xrlBMye+CenMLttLp2bhM1lEr dNCNWxuXM8rpqRWaY2OM7M4vJ1qFJBTfYiF/TYGqMSAW1rZpLWdRU/IuVqq1TRzF24XL pB5g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=wyq9o6CLe/CWysVsxMMwXv5M0jvT+Y6UcWbtaax+h84=; b=U3XjDCrb4uq0q2CyoV1Blc8wfrrAqxFY8zmtQpjdBHqgt1qxEMXsLsjVeR60FNx5kE SK7GZeTVNezxL/XPhG4ABu7D9s59f7O73BC7sNtqCcpr9uMZlnaQteTM3Q45ZEx9Yesv v50/CLYJNbsFX/R5lijGxSCAOJIqNlQW3KeZHJE5ZY8xStFjwbmoIytzcBZNhE6PfZHS tqcROqPz7aDC/tSiW2aK337R+k3ttO5EwNLqBR/QSAHErUI2L45Vxd0htcQK3J/QbUsv J3EOtNMoVsIYXD8GtSugk7vCMzCP3WNM0EpG5lIDyfHIk1C2U+v9keIdr62ReYKBHkch nSdg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ihXBROBjB6jCsSJJ41m8Sb4yr7/BXJ33qos3WS0DjjAY/KloY FYNC0+Kz5OMXwJ7dqpUgCNEQZ3T00+6+fTHoCsg2yocsdXQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxfAAiEBYoD0kQuCcWqjUyfCESPBu/Z0NuuzpoQMaKT/hlZcSHSAwn2Ki9ZSd3n4eLnhQqqCMTkU25eiXix6gM=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4c10:: with SMTP id t16mr4415911lfq.193.1603048482912;  Sun, 18 Oct 2020 12:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160304776183.11381.2118845750027924964@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <160304776183.11381.2118845750027924964@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 12:14:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmW-FmQ8V3uiSR1E0Oqqu9tw-ba_2VHwi7qK5yfwooa0eQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, MPLS Working Group <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>,  "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000061c63805b1f6cfb5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/-2-gR-UIFzK26MrPaDNUMWG7c8Y>
Subject: [mpls] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd-11.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 19:14:47 -0000

--00000000000061c63805b1f6cfb5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Dear All,
a couple of updates in the new version to mention:

   - Gyan Mishra joined in the work as the co-author
   - changes of the destination IP address in the inner IP header:

OLD TEXT:
      destination IP address MUST be set to one of the loopback
      addresses from 127/8 range for IPv4 or to one of IPv4-mapped IPv4
      loopback addresses from ::ffff:127.0.0.0/104 range for IPv6.
NEW TEXT:
      destination IP address MUST be set to the loopback address
      127.0.0.1/32 for IPv4, or the loopback address ::1/128 for IPv6
      [RFC4291].

The reason for this update is not only a typo but more technical.
IPv4-mapped IPv6 loopback address range::ffff:127.0.0.0/104 has not the
same meaning in IPv6 as 127/8 range in IPv4. In fact, RFC 4291
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291> in Section 2.5.3 defines a single
address::1/128 as the Loopback Address.

Always welcome your questions, comments, and suggestions.

And appreciate WG consideration of a WG AP.

Regards,
Greg

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 12:02 PM
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd-11.txt
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, Gyan Mishra <
gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>



A new version of I-D, draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd-11.txt
has been successfully submitted by Greg Mirsky and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd
Revision:       11
Title:          BFD for Multipoint Networks over Point-to-Multi-Point MPLS
LSP
Document date:  2020-10-18
Group:          mpls
Pages:          10
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd-11.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd/
Htmlized:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd-11
Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd-11

Abstract:
   This document describes procedures for using Bidirectional Forwarding
   Detection (BFD) for multipoint networks to detect data plane failures
   in Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) point-to-multipoint (p2mp)
   Label Switched Paths (LSPs) using active tails with unsolicited
   notifications mode.  It also describes the applicability of LSP Ping,
   as in-band, and the control plane, as out-band, solutions to
   bootstrap a BFD session in this environment.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

--00000000000061c63805b1f6cfb5
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Dear All,<div>a couple of updates in the new version to me=
ntion:</div><div><ul><li>Gyan Mishra joined in the work as the co-author</l=
i><li>changes of the destination IP address in the inner IP header:</li></u=
l>OLD TEXT:</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 destination IP address MUST be s=
et to one of the loopback<br>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 addresses from 127/8 rang=
e for IPv4 or to one of IPv4-mapped IPv4<br>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 loopback a=
ddresses from ::ffff:<a href=3D"http://127.0.0.0/104">127.0.0.0/104</a> ran=
ge for IPv6.</div><div>NEW TEXT:</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 destination=
 IP address MUST be set to the loopback address<br>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 <a =
href=3D"http://127.0.0.1/32">127.0.0.1/32</a> for IPv4, or the loopback add=
ress ::1/128 for IPv6<br>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 [RFC4291].</div><div><br></di=
v><div>The reason for this update is not only a typo but more technical. IP=
v4-mapped IPv6 loopback address range::ffff:<a href=3D"http://127.0.0.0/104=
">127.0.0.0/104</a> has not the same meaning in IPv6 as 127/8 range in IPv4=
. In fact, <a href=3D"https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291">RFC 4291</a>=C2=
=A0in Section 2.5.3 defines a single address::1/128 as the Loopback Address=
.</div><div><br></div><div>Always welcome your questions, comments, and sug=
gestions.</div><div><br></div><div>And appreciate WG consideration of a WG =
AP.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Greg</div><div><br><div cla=
ss=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">---------- Forward=
ed message ---------<br>From: <span dir=3D"auto">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:inte=
rnet-drafts@ietf.org">internet-drafts@ietf.org</a>&gt;</span><br>Date: Sun,=
 Oct 18, 2020 at 12:02 PM<br>Subject: New Version Notification for draft-mi=
rsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd-11.txt<br>To: Greg Mirsky &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:gregimir=
sky@gmail.com">gregimirsky@gmail.com</a>&gt;, Gyan Mishra &lt;<a href=3D"ma=
ilto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com">gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com</a>&gt;<br></div>=
<br><br><br>
A new version of I-D, draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd-11.txt<br>
has been successfully submitted by Greg Mirsky and posted to the<br>
IETF repository.<br>
<br>
Name:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd<br=
>
Revision:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A011<br>
Title:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 BFD for Multipoint Networks over P=
oint-to-Multi-Point MPLS LSP<br>
Document date:=C2=A0 2020-10-18<br>
Group:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 mpls<br>
Pages:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 10<br>
URL:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 <a href=3D"https://www.ietf.o=
rg/archive/id/draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd-11.txt" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=
=3D"_blank">https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd-11.t=
xt</a><br>
Status:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"https://datatracker.iet=
f.org/doc/draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd/" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank"=
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd/</a><br>
Htmlized:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"https://datatracker.ietf.org=
/doc/html/draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">=
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd</a><br>
Htmlized:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"https://tools.ietf.org/html/=
draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd-11" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https:/=
/tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd-11</a><br>
Diff:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"https://www.ietf.o=
rg/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd-11" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=
=3D"_blank">https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd-=
11</a><br>
<br>
Abstract:<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0This document describes procedures for using Bidirectional For=
warding<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Detection (BFD) for multipoint networks to detect data plane f=
ailures<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0in Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) point-to-multipoint (p=
2mp)<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Label Switched Paths (LSPs) using active tails with unsolicite=
d<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0notifications mode.=C2=A0 It also describes the applicability =
of LSP Ping,<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0as in-band, and the control plane, as out-band, solutions to<b=
r>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0bootstrap a BFD session in this environment.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submissio=
n<br>
until the htmlized version and diff are available at <a href=3D"http://tool=
s.ietf.org" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">tools.ietf.org</a>.<br>
<br>
The IETF Secretariat<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></div>

--00000000000061c63805b1f6cfb5--


From nobody Sun Oct 18 20:25:45 2020
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFA23A1274; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.003
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yqtF4VqSzqfu; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEE953A1277; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:25:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (unknown [124.104.122.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 26D36321AE7; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 05:25:38 +0200 (CEST)
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: "mpls-ads@ietf.org" <mpls-ads@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-rmr@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-rmr@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <b0453453-b7c9-ed06-f359-459137ad4c2a@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <a16d3c18-ab56-bca1-805f-2e795e4f7d1c@pi.nu>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:24:57 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <b0453453-b7c9-ed06-f359-459137ad4c2a@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/b8aDSn2O8pY8rCNYRPK9zivz_po>
Subject: [mpls] HEADS UP!! ----Re: Document (draft-ietf-mpls-rmr) returned to working group - poll for interest.
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 03:25:45 -0000

Working Group

A little more than a week ago I sent this mail to the working group, 
asking about the interest to continue the work on draft-ietf-mpls-rmr. 
As of today I have not seen any reaction whatsoever.

I could take that to mean (unless there are a lot of mails the rest of 
this week) that there are no interest to continue working on the document.

I'm intrested to see all kinds of reactions e.g.:

- No, I don't think this is something the working group should do
- Hmmm, I don't have an opinion one way or another, if there are enough
   support to do continue working on it, I don't care if it is
   progressed.
- Yes, given that there are enough support we should go ahead an re-
   review the document, update and request publication.

For all categories it is good if you have technical motivations.

/Loa

On 03/10/2020 00:04, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
> 
> This mail starts a two week poll to establish the interest to continue 
> work on draft-ietf-mpls-rmr.
> 
> draft-ietf-mpls-rmr were returned to the working to the working group 
> (about 2 weeks ago).
> 
> Normally a document is returned this late in the process when a 
> necessary change is discovered that requires working group consensus 
> (i.e. a wglc) to implement. This time the document were returned due to 
> lack of (or very slow) response to directorate or the IESG reviews.
> 
> When a document is returned for a well defined technical change it is 
> fairly easy to handle, we make the change and do a wglc.
> 
> I have spent time trying to figure out what to do in a case like this. 
> There is very little information in our process document. The wg chairs 
> has converged on the following small process.
> 
> - establish wg interest for the document, i.e. is this something we want 
> to do and do we have interest participating in progressing the document.
> - leave approximately 2 weeks for working group discussion
> - wglc
> - when comments from the wglc is resolved, redo the publication request
> 
> This document start a two week poll to establish the level of interest 
> to continue to work on draft-ietf-mpls-rmr.
> 
> Please answer the following 2 questions:
> 
> - do you think draft-ietf-mpls-rmr is need and will actually be deployed?
> 
> - do you have the cycles to contribute to progressing the document
> 
> /Loa
> for the working group chairs
> 
> 

-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64


From nobody Sun Oct 18 23:36:19 2020
Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B63A3A141A; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 23:36:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1jXsnnDdMzt4; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 23:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9B2B3A1418; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 23:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml733-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 988EF6A6F4954966B383; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 07:36:13 +0100 (IST)
Received: from dggeme704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.100) by lhreml733-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 07:36:13 +0100
Received: from dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.100) by dggeme704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:36:11 +0800
Received: from dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.77]) by dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.77]) with mapi id 15.01.1913.007; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:36:11 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
Thread-Index: AdaY1LuALWlBbybiQBmQ3luSJJ9RCANC251g
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 06:36:11 +0000
Message-ID: <647798ade1834d7c98ec16ca9cb9415a@huawei.com>
References: <00d001d698d4$f1bca890$d535f9b0$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <00d001d698d4$f1bca890$d535f9b0$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.108.243.143]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/UQmuQiNR_U6lpzh5TMXtO-F9inU>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 06:36:17 -0000

Hi Adrian,=20

I just read this document and support its publication once the comments men=
tioned by others are resolved. It is helpful to clarify the organization of=
 the registries at one place .

Best regards,
Jie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: Friday, October 2, 2020 11:59 PM
> To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
> Subject: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call :
> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
>=20
> I know this is not the most exciting document the working group has ever
> produced, but as shepherd I need to see some comments and expressions of
> support.
>=20
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32
> To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
> Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call :
> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
>=20
> Hi MPLS WG,
>=20
> As previously noted, I'm the shepherd for this document and I'm running t=
he
> working group last call as agreed by the chairs.
>=20
> This email starts a two-week last call on
> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-upda=
te/
>=20
> Please send your opinions to the mailing list before October 9th.
>=20
> While yes/no opinions are not without value, it is far more helpful if yo=
u can
> indicate whether you have read the latest version of the draft, and what =
the
> reasons are for your opinions.
>=20
> Of course, all of your review comments will be helpful in improving the
> document.
>=20
> Best,
> Adrian
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls


From nobody Mon Oct 19 04:05:47 2020
Return-Path: <N.Leymann@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523F73A0AF1; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 04:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.196
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=telekom.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2TrFxEFXwoAf; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 04:05:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout21.telekom.de (mailout21.telekom.de [194.25.225.215]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B40213A0AEC; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 04:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telekom.de; i=@telekom.de; q=dns/txt; s=dtag1; t=1603105544; x=1634641544; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=sNTNcltFapl3UMbf2ydwk4zTFTkcmKs8wJeLDu6R114=; b=NUxH5kUUHWIOcOwUUIof0IMBio18ZJdc6h37Fk1kTbEIW3o5g3vplwq5 kcf77XHEzNx4Uq5dM32UsKU5cMFynXy1QbuwyjEINyxGF6eC/AfjsO8HD mYly+DRXxuED3q7b96qmFRCfmKcAv3DgF1GjdDcLVzOWz/Spxqgk4vfW8 9lf+SLXWS7ftdWyDsRpGO/vQlrC+HhH9Gif+ePo4Jogo1kl4AL+oxUTLQ mfaPZrvl5Kg6QAuW/qrcbFeOOvwKffpr57mvIEli9mwrXtvYjFFmDmjcM va1Gm2xTddAfBgddQOcURZcO8FdSc6yVjiVxVczc5ZpovEqrhhwoeABSv A==;
IronPort-SDR: jcfMa64ID0AvDIaxVxaveixQmIjywVWKsaBXIjo3W/SUxWYGdVG1ftzSp+ovFyRXogFrfoIeGs 7kFoSTTvU4Qg==
Received: from qdefcs.de.t-internal.com ([10.171.254.41]) by MAILOUT21.dmznet.de.t-internal.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 19 Oct 2020 13:05:40 +0200
IronPort-SDR: oHkij1JdlbCq/12EcTiyceOrBrwQZBaF/gh+3/0AMV5hmFZIC0JtofS6UDxwgrdtFGQT0PxrN6 eOSs6MAo6h9uu8eW/xP6lhNRq3vwpfyh0=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,394,1596492000"; d="scan'208";a="217333693"
X-MGA-submission: =?us-ascii?q?MDELM0HO9Ffs+JkXkyRhmMoGRUxVFs38We4bss?= =?us-ascii?q?/MrhSzYCOXN7ADTnNLqm9Paf0TwUEsp7Qkau6DZkwoCi+CWwbOyWlwpY?= =?us-ascii?q?WuNXBmX/HvcfZjYuEDXI97mckv23tmicQZHOZDaMcSz3LPBsXNQGwvBr?= =?us-ascii?q?NX18MGuWgRl06rDMvTQKCmew=3D=3D?=
Received: from he105867.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.169.119.44]) by QDEFCV.de.t-internal.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256; 19 Oct 2020 13:05:40 +0200
Received: from HE199743.EMEA1.cds.t-internal.com (10.169.119.51) by HE105867.emea1.cds.t-internal.com (10.169.119.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 13:05:38 +0200
Received: from HE104163.emea1.cds.t-internal.com (10.171.40.38) by HE199743.EMEA1.cds.t-internal.com (10.169.119.51) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 13:05:38 +0200
Received: from GER01-LEJ-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.de (51.5.80.24) by O365mail05.telekom.de (172.30.0.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 13:05:24 +0200
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=UX8zebBY+d+jxllh8MvLrtzfo3qnmI1KV21UamCtNIC4qYMJlxZSThJ3VOoAks8jjgVVcDVZZju/+p4bGP0UbBiL/qh+DAzpvqhzhYMgD+cnA3lEiFSYlEYBWl3yrT391XtXZ3eFOhMlsTvD6lrF1UoWA6oRcEhKlJh3WywtHxXP0ZoVvkFKBhAIhXWdUZCWp0x1CagTv7mUA5OwhBqFm5cbZJ6LoZF0B5geUpmuivZZ2DN6okF8cn9ZgKi3qH+xy5Ln0NycfJbIP9Tn9I+iTImqC9Q7YyBEDpukAV+rVMatbKohs0hP5lEIdXtlNqJ/hVQHE/+/fvFbUUNOjSyQyQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;  s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=sNTNcltFapl3UMbf2ydwk4zTFTkcmKs8wJeLDu6R114=; b=aOLzGrUcLaRybLxWuTGmzFpI4oFQOd4JeOS7rSclgDiYODGuJEbcvk3HzVHeDC3iIeoRNlX53Mh+kUcg2J6T6OcPfrcuY8fVAEZp54hKwL+Yebw2lGOyrQKpu2oon0kTPCtwmDW+uYlwqkeIzPPGs7ZR49HkF5wR0cx+lMpQnlyq3CvJfPd+EiMHKGSrr0xEThDgiZSMjvC7ez57ID61WP+7IoCGa6gRVEVF4LLqIWBcmBFWgRY1KoUSvagriGK4wwhYTFiTLpKbS8RPB63aL3V5qCK+urMVecoiV/9pWZvD+Wg2yZR/RU/79VKEMpUU1RYborurrRF6WaVVTDM2Ig==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=telekom.de; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=telekom.de; dkim=pass header.d=telekom.de; arc=none
Received: from LEXPR01MB0559.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE (2a01:4180:c013:b::16) by LEXPR01MB0400.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE (2a01:4180:c013:c::10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3477.15; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:05:24 +0000
Received: from LEXPR01MB0559.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE ([fe80::f0a6:4ae1:24f5:8d5b]) by LEXPR01MB0559.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE ([fe80::f0a6:4ae1:24f5:8d5b%8]) with mapi id 15.20.3477.028; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:05:24 +0000
From: <N.Leymann@telekom.de>
To: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
CC: <draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology@ietf.org>, <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Intended status of draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology
Thread-Index: AQHWo+KJopIbK8iDekuaa7vnhU6tw6mextzw
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:05:24 +0000
Message-ID: <LEXPR01MB05597513E1F07FDF78878E06981E0@LEXPR01MB0559.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE>
References: <CA+RyBmViLvqf6hZzsB704MC95fdYc36v7tb96itzHWaGeLaRKw@mail.gmail.com> <B60F8567-DFA1-4414-A663-C150D4B199D9@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <B60F8567-DFA1-4414-A663-C150D4B199D9@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=telekom.de;
x-originating-ip: [93.227.178.173]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 652f5df7-625f-492c-2855-08d8741ee111
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: LEXPR01MB0400:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <LEXPR01MB04007E0DE7D82651ED919BDE981E0@LEXPR01MB0400.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: A+W65lyQNMCC3wzloHIRZNTY7AazQpe/+qhVhOzC6oQiAlopU3J2jhtTCcwmcl/0Bq+Dxv/7QxSoTp0mTaTeRRIP+gS13RHxz7Slhi4Qhe4z5QXVehoIWxCCzNW2hi/BRv8/y2C41sqV5QYcajyS0ITLSluvix2jgr3cf2CzIO7jv7KTgDalPWLEiSGMzjGE8Dd1lDOkT25MJQqtSdhts5joVzqBwprynha66Dl3MPtyzZiksCSOmH6WClxrFLx9fzxJ5DH+SaO08RNtoov4jzm/GGz4cev56EnmaDrPktApzBw+uHrvYJCUYlX5WEiWn9/aQr8g6kdlp/+k8B0Vx6prHT76dL2b5Bmn7tbmQQ0=
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:;  IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:LEXPR01MB0559.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE; PTR:; CAT:NONE;  SFS:(366004)(396003)(376002)(346002)(136003)(39860400002)(7696005)(9686003)(86362001)(8676002)(186003)(53546011)(478600001)(2906002)(66574015)(83380400001)(55016002)(33656002)(71200400001)(26005)(316002)(4326008)(8936002)(966005)(66946007)(110136005)(5660300002)(54906003)(66446008)(66556008)(66476007)(64756008)(76116006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; 
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: o1WjcvxaInKLeTo2MtaXJP73ouN/LLlRwklKvUG722bpzD13pyaTWAj/QA5me6r0sYdQv1hc40lip3N9QQ20aREgdc7ufgoYk7qtQjxFsox7BTPSrNXz85AtAk+JCKsY48B5UpP6LvfvAzKR0va73tH3URzU4vgv+KNOwLeH/1+eZ85yD9mdH1xoM+O5iY8QfrB7cRq0zI/pP7vpfN4suGcDAJ2pOYO+LDiSkuVnaKR1s3g46sASPfE/V13NaUza7mppkEwUPN/2KW3oLXSlJ6YOMKW5qiXbllBc0el/I8LHcl+r4LUaka1IKDpVjFaDTHufMLUDQCRUXcI7QgBLiyCDXKc6C8T4AK0O55MjNjIh2N9UeDo75Etxt+rN28fuJ/ijC9VDTIANWFlRTicveRqTcDEAK2+WRUnHoXuaTrKTchr7xdUJ3dZn7bMBjAx40ydwJt9WAjkdC4zQcWEL5BaVw8N4yaUL150iWO5yosB2NkuD23TxCb6OzYnK9Tn0fmD9p0yF5b+7eh+IbZe16408r5jCNM7tUS9aWD1g/9XLh/AaGpA4K5u2Qr1yE7r5w22KzwBAtA9AB2ebJkw1DcMY8EjltGw9kY5cTAYilXwb/fvG3yAHtiqaPJlyvOpe+o7KQiIvTf+BLp2AhmOnDA==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: LEXPR01MB0559.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 652f5df7-625f-492c-2855-08d8741ee111
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Oct 2020 11:05:24.5774 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bde4dffc-4b60-4cf6-8b04-a5eeb25f5c4f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: gbtqoiinyvWMo61q1fZ3yyNIqbdSO1Htd9fsWtyD9ukULbGzgvf1qPz4hY92z502mp03+i+5R4VAfEtYcmIL2g==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: LEXPR01MB0400
X-TM-SNTS-SMTP: E9E7B8DFCD06CFEB5773A6776786BCC7D9986C083C3C254D587A634D82EC23F72000:8
X-OriginatorOrg: telekom.de
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/prRB6S0mqpDmmvw15Wo9L3UuTLQ>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Intended status of draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:05:46 -0000

Hi,

Yep, in deed I forgot to change it - should be fixed by now.

regards

Nic

-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> Im Auftrag von Stewart Bryant
Gesendet: Freitag, 16. Oktober 2020 19:33
An: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology@ietf.org; mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
Betreff: Re: [mpls] Intended status of draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology

Greg

It updates an ST RFC so it has to be ST.

I think the draft is right (it changed) but the shepherd forgot to update t=
he tracker.

- Stewart

> On 16 Oct 2020, at 15:59, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> Dear Authors,
> hope you can clarify the intended status of the draft. I've noticed that =
the datatracker reflects it as Informational while the document itself stat=
es that is on the Standards track. As I understand RFC 2026 a document is e=
ither on Standards or non-Standards, e.g., Informational track.
> Thank you in advance.
>=20
> Regards,
> Greg
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls


From nobody Mon Oct 19 10:51:11 2020
Return-Path: <luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3053A0ECA; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.202
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=telefonica.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id goKLd8SCvZqo; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr150101.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.15.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8C083A0EC8; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:51:04 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=gs2WpeR1H14oKvCxBTcKRn9fLYFMY8VhSn6/tEBi5nEApHqbstwE06Q5gJssmg8GTLvzfFhYzpsn2eeJzjiefjRgDJbj10UNFuiag8SIBjg6uSS3ssE/98X5ORW9SW8AgWKzbUeYayu6IE9ToNFyiDe9+6OE2GhLyG4edugk00JrjBcolS+bwso8rlzlDvr7grzsVqGcU/TihnDJuMzhthRoWKepDRm1dnlBJEuqQxXmY2iItdRG4Ys92+ySpBB/ptu474zuMxSudw/vaicmdkpwv6Nv/AEBPUCriZAiMNKx58wdPBgEWqHXvoiTFDVo7/FVdc/oB3d5DnD3b8qCuQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;  s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=fn+oGMdpzM7rEEVFwJFJHHFDcdG3nD7Chui3W9rqmb0=; b=oAP7WcDWOGAQIbjrejPCk8aOqypVbyIahCPFFlh15XqhrSE6psdrtCC9nCOkFGRhyEdAQYmnOvL1YihkUVY8tcBubdLfyZ2D+RgGaxeaGyhVVICoWaxn6VNhkr4R2vKIIrMEhaAaDhdZeezlMBqC8tsJWvthwRa4hhks9075ZlAQdMyQzF5r6AJ1fjqHdIuoBS+nZfS2vA1So4TskOxzgXKqtUL7M9WdaCc4JAMwo0GkO1OsgKmz4EhR2l6Ynarv8eIAcQ4/+OMHizNEIbAYmqR4cABjTZg4pBl9wV9ispIrvEPS/Q01ayOQzQ8fO77s99aYfLllcgy2DXzft+CuTw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=telefonica.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=telefonica.com; dkim=pass header.d=telefonica.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telefonica.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=fn+oGMdpzM7rEEVFwJFJHHFDcdG3nD7Chui3W9rqmb0=; b=ZtqJQ16LvkchujfOuU2cnodHGQnoEazfxzZj79CJuNHqlwR/4mzVThcK0yRsxjkQvlxeX/uz1mkkVGPEDFsH9sbAJjIdCu1UjXhzm8uYIPiWqHW83GkB4VhXBreh+DFGSdP2WG9BvRGTnznoT4kEZgZVJ242n846g7GOi/Arf8A=
Received: from VI1PR0601MB2157.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:800:2f::19) by VI1PR06MB5359.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:803:bd::33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3477.27; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 17:51:00 +0000
Received: from VI1PR0601MB2157.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c44b:536e:309f:8850]) by VI1PR0601MB2157.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c44b:536e:309f:8850%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3477.028; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 17:51:00 +0000
From: LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO <luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
CC: "mpls-ads@ietf.org" <mpls-ads@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-rmr@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-rmr@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: HEADS UP!! ----Re: [mpls] Document (draft-ietf-mpls-rmr) returned to working group - poll for interest.
Thread-Index: AQHWmNXJfhg/6ZtoOkWavbTZdnxsXKmeXSqAgADwGdA=
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 17:51:00 +0000
Message-ID: <VI1PR0601MB21575E9B3BAA05EA8C66F0969E1E0@VI1PR0601MB2157.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <b0453453-b7c9-ed06-f359-459137ad4c2a@pi.nu> <a16d3c18-ab56-bca1-805f-2e795e4f7d1c@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <a16d3c18-ab56-bca1-805f-2e795e4f7d1c@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: es-ES, en-US
Content-Language: es-ES
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
authentication-results: pi.nu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;pi.nu; dmarc=none action=none header.from=telefonica.com;
x-originating-ip: [88.9.196.206]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8d3d11f6-2132-4c0f-bf71-08d874578a8e
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VI1PR06MB5359:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <VI1PR06MB5359899B4179DD8B592DB4949E1E0@VI1PR06MB5359.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: EMYQGC683Vn/lj4W6v7vzacse9hiY3k7s9SuzeHszyo5xi20oWYEDAC/+MuURehrdqY90VAx/XTnGzuPC/whV0n2JehEetFUfD3e+hrdMdy6KsrsUao/Sde9T30tOdsONbLt2nLCRTPlwzI/4Eh/bA/ShrJmvbAhXoCBz1tJbxueEnwBMpoghQWiltkIUi/ZaNthnTu0P48RDYOVwlcMEPi2lJmDLvhu2mZupWr5eC95yDhPN4DcdQ6s/+XLxsWEW/qTdzQLH8jFCshxIzLVQXWIJ3ghUbCj4tv9fKxGgLXYATgX+ti8brt2rx1tVJkNO0eOoeSdmxbYOD4SemGFes3F6+MZSNiPX4lOB6uCDrfNHZ6X5l7EDG5oOHMBobt1
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:;  IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:VI1PR0601MB2157.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE;  SFS:(4636009)(39860400002)(376002)(136003)(366004)(346002)(396003)(8936002)(55016002)(186003)(52536014)(83380400001)(33656002)(54906003)(66574015)(64756008)(66556008)(66446008)(66476007)(110136005)(316002)(5660300002)(26005)(86362001)(478600001)(66946007)(71200400001)(786003)(4326008)(76116006)(7696005)(8676002)(9686003)(6506007)(53546011)(2906002)(9010500006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; 
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: kCKMXHx7jkL8HWDwiJ9mRSof12GGVekXhpz7eaahTAAQaV7/pYM8pqSCUCxiLMPTurCn7EmB/nSmhCfjyMnINm0rcoAnWpio9OKXGSPRc7J4YhL78u971WXbdQmtb3qj8FqthhibmrY3UGtrBBWj9GwVgnhFBZ8FbYHR8j3Vwol/mbljlg2dvb/z6VpaT6Of/cr9+6fFt7uZW0VYfCWsi6TTsKQ7agVuv48Z2YPkdOStW9JKoBz/msuZuIFsLf52CIKcxhE66cWdv7unu+5zFRHxXdHglFnmbVdlltlg4BRNfsNg6sLIqLwmcN5r2zGJAGwb465pv6LppzhphMDLrLIAPAWG27dQObOd8u9NgvFUBBR1VlQoLbw+CiVzSJkRTIdGOOhDiylAxOMVqnS0szGAOzgSfSibede61flrhxFnO9LcwDIxxHQAEgex+tyy/XPmyapTxAU0EvO1BjA8nmxYlDj6Bg4r1S9BJquYNtboOOFsb9GGA15zCB1jGGfBXf6klksDjNCht44yEC9vVGavoMVJ2zEy0BMrIazE/MTHt9+/c6EOcWHuJorMcP4HXe6lvAd7y0a1uDUiIbjNnydFelcwjsw2dfZZe7Y9rorGkq1/1Iepcw7ynj4ZkqNoomOj3mLHXlibDFeCArcl8A==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: telefonica.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: VI1PR0601MB2157.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8d3d11f6-2132-4c0f-bf71-08d874578a8e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Oct 2020 17:51:00.6443 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 9744600e-3e04-492e-baa1-25ec245c6f10
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: YPPxPIOwjxdOsBsWodWUEfAvqiHqgm4NjBqs+blpmmZM0FtSgWIIOkOlKW7y1SxX0tn3u4z2FxaTwB670p1vJpdH7uN5evvRYGYsBbPx9sLDHkljbKCv2HTXbbtUPfsC5LOwJWzKWT8EfXzpjdgmHA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR06MB5359
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/J1Ne0B9ZpB2LaL2KSTsiGu2CGKQ>
Subject: Re: [mpls] HEADS UP!! ----Re: Document (draft-ietf-mpls-rmr) returned to working group - poll for interest.
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 17:51:10 -0000
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=


From nobody Mon Oct 19 18:28:14 2020
Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2D13A0948; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.086
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZF_Er9qUou39; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92c.google.com (mail-ua1-x92c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40C9D3A0962; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92c.google.com with SMTP id x11so139256uav.1; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;  h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sC0z9/5LyIGk/Lo9NJFstAQsfAzSjIzE1qvfqxHo2MQ=; b=hXCXyzlj6J+TCv075Ip3QRCWiN79/wW9bDaoGVjLklZQIJJeURDdUws32i7xEdqvXO mwIozPhdV4R9d76kqAIPRGyhjKnPnvX3+v1xUeHpBm7DVHOFCe4Avo64ckCh7li1PpqL y/Smu2eg9v0vdDs9ebDaDSLs6J/mG9rYy2vYFTky3boZhjoa7xOXZd4NosPUaqKXDZhu RbhIjbozP/iu9KwfdCb0Rse7EQcSUdefbcoogRcccN5+RQQ/5uGYG6sN9Tjs0mMZeExN HXF1e0PM5ekw9wGof75/4gnxGUfUzlnABKrd37+4eI3913V3ZFm921FNfU6LLWItJfVe I8Mg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sC0z9/5LyIGk/Lo9NJFstAQsfAzSjIzE1qvfqxHo2MQ=; b=Qq+ua1jwSZm4sZPRtHrjz8lXMZb1ubxXMTM8y9eHNLxt+x/gMOWb9EFpu9K5GFCjYO lz4077JzNpqoqzDLaLytuAnDXim1tO448UskGShZffw00TQ4sjYoycIrRAeNeo5Roj9T Ofrscy/VMqKoffaGoT1qIFg/YEtIbpEerwVnU0/Ygpd8AGuZSFioyluNqDNSAo9azWpu 4rOEO6MmegJHrQxEmpWOdqsW5YjRewa655m7s0lcnq4DEcPmiiOi3aw9EQJE5FyOmgYW SY5xJ67AZoFFnlrAKZwO+8C/CfSJsW0Tfjv1stA0v+dNin0X21Zd6KTrbYs2KPDOb7Zh qrTg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530RGl/jVTxNdtZ7eRVebVkVlvnHsUXvF7CAE9R7ulYh2oHJwSnj hsO+9bY8IrBJko1yZiERgULtU5JbLI7G9IePuus=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzSxPWiP+KHdoIvw4PjiU2JMQjpZ2Q2dnx/1wpvBfl7NW+141n2wthALBudaEPvkjLh1Xb7XzSZPK+HtXHd434=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:48ae:: with SMTP id x43mr146184uac.114.1603157290100;  Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <00d001d698d4$f1bca890$d535f9b0$@olddog.co.uk> <647798ade1834d7c98ec16ca9cb9415a@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <647798ade1834d7c98ec16ca9cb9415a@huawei.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:27:59 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV0X+UXwsVuqW7VRZB2YTXNSe7PLxaLX65n4SqHOU16mTQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
Cc: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>,  "draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cbad8c05b2102428"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/Yc1wi-61-_1DwyRiFrkl5Qqygk4>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 01:28:13 -0000

--000000000000cbad8c05b2102428
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

I support publication of this document once some of the comments mentioned
are cleared up as well.

Kind Regards

Gyan

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 2:36 AM Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi Adrian,
>
> I just read this document and support its publication once the comments
> mentioned by others are resolved. It is helpful to clarify the organization
> of the registries at one place .
>
> Best regards,
> Jie
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> > Sent: Friday, October 2, 2020 11:59 PM
> > To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
> > Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
> > Subject: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call :
> > draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
> >
> > I know this is not the most exciting document the working group has ever
> > produced, but as shepherd I need to see some comments and expressions of
> > support.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Adrian
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> > Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32
> > To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
> > Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
> > Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call :
> > draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
> >
> > Hi MPLS WG,
> >
> > As previously noted, I'm the shepherd for this document and I'm running
> the
> > working group last call as agreed by the chairs.
> >
> > This email starts a two-week last call on
> > draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
> >
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update/
> >
> > Please send your opinions to the mailing list before October 9th.
> >
> > While yes/no opinions are not without value, it is far more helpful if
> you can
> > indicate whether you have read the latest version of the draft, and what
> the
> > reasons are for your opinions.
> >
> > Of course, all of your review comments will be helpful in improving the
> > document.
> >
> > Best,
> > Adrian
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpls mailing list
> > mpls@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpls mailing list
> > mpls@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *



*M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD

--000000000000cbad8c05b2102428
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">I support publication of this document onc=
e some of the comments mentioned are cleared up as well.</div><div dir=3D"a=
uto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Kind Regards=C2=A0</div><div dir=3D"auto">=
<br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Gyan</div><div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><=
div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 2:36 AM Dongji=
e (Jimmy) &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jie.dong@huawei.com">jie.dong@huawei.com</a=
>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0=
 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Adrian, <br>
<br>
I just read this document and support its publication once the comments men=
tioned by others are resolved. It is helpful to clarify the organization of=
 the registries at one place .<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
Jie<br>
<br>
&gt; -----Original Message-----<br>
&gt; From: mpls [mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org" target=3D"=
_blank">mpls-bounces@ietf.org</a>] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel<br>
&gt; Sent: Friday, October 2, 2020 11:59 PM<br>
&gt; To: &#39;mpls&#39; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:mpls@ietf.org" target=3D"_bla=
nk">mpls@ietf.org</a>&gt;<br>
&gt; Cc: <a href=3D"mailto:draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.=
org" target=3D"_blank">draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org<=
/a><br>
&gt; Subject: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call=
 :<br>
&gt; draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; I know this is not the most exciting document the working group has ev=
er<br>
&gt; produced, but as shepherd I need to see some comments and expressions =
of<br>
&gt; support.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Thanks,<br>
&gt; Adrian<br>
&gt; -----Original Message-----<br>
&gt; From: mpls &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org" target=3D"_bla=
nk">mpls-bounces@ietf.org</a>&gt; On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel<br>
&gt; Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32<br>
&gt; To: &#39;mpls&#39; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:mpls@ietf.org" target=3D"_bla=
nk">mpls@ietf.org</a>&gt;<br>
&gt; Cc: <a href=3D"mailto:draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.=
org" target=3D"_blank">draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org<=
/a><br>
&gt; Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call :<br>
&gt; draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Hi MPLS WG,<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; As previously noted, I&#39;m the shepherd for this document and I&#39;=
m running the<br>
&gt; working group last call as agreed by the chairs.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; This email starts a two-week last call on<br>
&gt; draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04<br>
&gt; <a href=3D"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-r=
egistries-update/" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://datatracker=
.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update/</a><br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Please send your opinions to the mailing list before October 9th.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; While yes/no opinions are not without value, it is far more helpful if=
 you can<br>
&gt; indicate whether you have read the latest version of the draft, and wh=
at the<br>
&gt; reasons are for your opinions.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Of course, all of your review comments will be helpful in improving th=
e<br>
&gt; document.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Best,<br>
&gt; Adrian<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; _______________________________________________<br>
&gt; mpls mailing list<br>
&gt; <a href=3D"mailto:mpls@ietf.org" target=3D"_blank">mpls@ietf.org</a><b=
r>
&gt; <a href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls" rel=3D"noreferr=
er" target=3D"_blank">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls</a><br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; _______________________________________________<br>
&gt; mpls mailing list<br>
&gt; <a href=3D"mailto:mpls@ietf.org" target=3D"_blank">mpls@ietf.org</a><b=
r>
&gt; <a href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls" rel=3D"noreferr=
er" target=3D"_blank">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
mpls mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:mpls@ietf.org" target=3D"_blank">mpls@ietf.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls" rel=3D"noreferrer" t=
arget=3D"_blank">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>-- <br><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature" =
data-smartmail=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div d=
ir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"l=
tr"><div><p style=3D"color:rgb(34,34,34)"><a href=3D"http://www.verizon.com=
/" style=3D"color:rgb(17,85,204);padding-bottom:1em;display:inline-block" t=
arget=3D"_blank"><img src=3D"http://ss7.vzw.com/is/image/VerizonWireless/vz=
-logo-email" width=3D"81" height=3D"18" style=3D"height:18px;width:81px"></=
a><br></p><p style=3D"font-size:1em;margin:0px;font-family:&quot;Verizon NH=
G DS&quot;,Arial,sans-serif;line-height:13px;color:black"><b>Gyan Mishra</b=
></p><p style=3D"color:rgb(34,34,34);margin:0px;line-height:13px"><font fac=
e=3D"georgia, serif" style=3D"color:black;font-size:1em"><i>Network Solutio=
ns A</i></font><font color=3D"#000000" face=3D"georgia, serif"><i>rchitect=
=C2=A0</i></font></p><p style=3D"font-size:1em;margin:0px;line-height:13px;=
color:black"><i><font face=3D"georgia, serif">M 301 502-1347<br>13101 Colum=
bia Pike=C2=A0<br></font></i>Silver Spring, MD</p></div><div><br></div></di=
v></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>

--000000000000cbad8c05b2102428--


From nobody Mon Oct 19 18:56:59 2020
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BE63A0B71; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.20.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: mpls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <160315901368.11972.13450351851662593086@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:56:53 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/UYdwk8W1cgCdre66GxZkNv0AR30>
Subject: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-16.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 01:56:54 -0000

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG of the IETF.

        Title           : A YANG Data Model for MPLS Base
        Authors         : Tarek Saad
                          Kamran Raza
                          Rakesh Gandhi
                          Xufeng Liu
                          Vishnu Pavan Beeram
	Filename        : draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-16.txt
	Pages           : 29
	Date            : 2020-10-19

Abstract:
   This document contains a specification of the MPLS base YANG data
   model.  The MPLS base YANG data model serves as a base framework for
   configuring and managing an MPLS switching subsystem on an MPLS-
   enabled router.  It is expected that other MPLS YANG data models
   (e.g.  MPLS Label Switched Path (LSP) Static, LDP or RSVP-TE YANG
   models) will augment the MPLS base YANG data model.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-16
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-16

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-16


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/



From nobody Tue Oct 20 02:49:52 2020
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E0DB3A1042 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 02:49:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TFokJi4f_xwV for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 02:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14EC03A1040 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 02:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id C5CDAF406F4; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 02:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
To: ice@cisco.com, erosen@cisco.com, mnapierala@att.com, n.leymann@telekom.de,  db3546@att.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, loa@pi.nu, n.leymann@telekom.de, tsaad.net@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: Alexander.Vainshtein@rbbn.com, mpls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20201020094945.C5CDAF406F4@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 02:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/eazBOSI3gSw9OET4Vd9mDBdFSb8>
Subject: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6512 (6313)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 09:49:50 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6512,
"Using Multipoint LDP When the Backbone Has No Route to the Root".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6313

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@rbbn.com>

Section: 3.2.1

Original Text
-------------
Since P1 has no root to PE2, PE1 needs to originate an mLDP message with a FEC element that identifies ASBR1 as the root.

Corrected Text
--------------
Since P1 has no route to PE2, PE1 needs to originate an mLDP message with a FEC element that identifies ASBR1 as the root.

Notes
-----
"no root to PE2" does not parse and looks as a typo. 
And it is quite clear from the context that "no route to PE2" is intended.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6512 (draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-recurs-fec-04)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Using Multipoint LDP When the Backbone Has No Route to the Root
Publication Date    : February 2012
Author(s)           : IJ. Wijnands, E. Rosen, M. Napierala, N. Leymann
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG


From nobody Tue Oct 20 07:49:00 2020
Return-Path: <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27AD93A0EEE; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d7gd04oFjeeH; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:48:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x333.google.com (mail-ot1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C29E3A0EE9; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x333.google.com with SMTP id f10so1945425otb.6; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;  h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :accept-language:content-language:mime-version; bh=cAbJV2khpP8WoBrPULzxflLMcoNW/HvUEedtC6IRdTA=; b=hloMR14cWoaCwxx2wLSk+Qfq/hzERvIH6NjNp1TWSRTyqXcMD+ksdnICUNECRMubo3 LaNs0vK0502hQcMOCAlxWT1gAfuOniXK78vEccdN6tdfV8BnIp9XmUflXvbn7UrWtMw1 6m+c32aKhGA/NMVDuDI+Xz09yIS6ieLQgIr2k0bybTTVmGPZrEFQpVIssDOMSueDohTS B7E8bLDwyx85BFMaNcIoZF1LjcGT0EY44f9qkr6ZqXcplWgxsTy41KnMS6DyKqgxM8p7 NeHGB/swBDHaRDYNYjT2dACXuVCYHKOPSDxH6HNDmNeRj460rrRQlDb/Rb/H/k5CIi47 KgEw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:accept-language:content-language:mime-version; bh=cAbJV2khpP8WoBrPULzxflLMcoNW/HvUEedtC6IRdTA=; b=sFoFSU5HrQQWZ7HKMDFPqA83TBBFyYomK2VYPCDeWV2/HQLyVTuBl0746m3n6rrVp3 t4VWAkDVNr+s3whdM4bVdxkT2154RHgJUBzs9KJjk51tx6MM8lQHGHq1dbRAFm7P4vW0 JUcGFfR7csPq3XghLCwWRvGOXHHEglNvLEKUC1LPP5P1RbMdkO/EFb4k6oiQTLEJcRaK mE3R60z/dsIT5qhyqhiYEyR+LwL4To2nVBvFXIsRVn/vDhF2lV3BBMVX3RQQfmk38wV8 PNaldW0T5lj1/aKRfkHDRllCGx3GKlspxBI4ivpxf11aJ+1Rqne7wN158v+E8ZXi3d8S YSeA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530KPbyYQQjVFyWBK1uaoi7FFs5fY9vwG3CqnG7O701SkCQFFLLM 0I+em8Swm7ty9PzMkWBp8Lo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx/T1myJWHtEwHrVUNywM2xKY9Ff/HTOR/CI6UIHSuU68MV0W2rFN7ZCLeZd02+LOgepxiJ6g==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7a46:: with SMTP id z6mr2086759otm.170.1603205335534;  Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:48:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([2603:1036:4:9e::5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y4sm502630oou.38.2020.10.20.07.48.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
To: "kaduk@mit.edu" <kaduk@mit.edu>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org>,  "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "loa@pi.nu" <loa@pi.nu>
Thread-Topic: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-15: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHWpvAhto2BjEC8p0q5/aVn2h2Vjg==
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:48:53 +0000
Message-ID: <DM5PR1901MB2150F36A917D391D5E4B2D84FC1F0@DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RecordReviewCfmType: 0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM5PR1901MB2150F36A917D391D5E4B2D84FC1F0DM5PR1901MB2150_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/FS7G7ngdfl2042ocLG99lfuEN1A>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:48:59 -0000

--_000_DM5PR1901MB2150F36A917D391D5E4B2D84FC1F0DM5PR1901MB2150_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
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--_000_DM5PR1901MB2150F36A917D391D5E4B2D84FC1F0DM5PR1901MB2150_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
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--_000_DM5PR1901MB2150F36A917D391D5E4B2D84FC1F0DM5PR1901MB2150_--


From nobody Tue Oct 20 07:50:11 2020
Return-Path: <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F17FC3A0EF6; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vSBhmTEz3pHL; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x329.google.com (mail-ot1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 751563A0EF8; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x329.google.com with SMTP id t15so1985847otk.0; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;  h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :references:accept-language:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=KG4ScdNuqV35I4oiboUOkFbD1CkME9cr3HVdz+429Z8=; b=F1pkPAtesKVbtwAVeS+kE2pPCjnW6vlDUfDTc79VmV2ve8AL9gtMt6+kCcYIhKSmdq t2CA1/dXmFkD8QcfKrmQqMj3/RTIkOV3KrjjZ9x7jzVEccnMq3eXbWPHSlw/NZ1ORtBq fhi8X505EdmOIzSLS1i6bWyQdd+xs4qK6UBwIMlCEnHqCTu2jclW7u+YTibLyqoF+HS7 ZzPpf9iWiAWQ4nAhoXTu4uMimZvbwEznN5iP29kjm3Z84nyTxOYYGeTdi1nvwm2AvdSS LsXUtvkgopNE/ZrF24/qi2glszdYmStwWTXdFZ+XeEwBhI/JzTlVgE0syW3OAsaEuY47 SW6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:accept-language:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=KG4ScdNuqV35I4oiboUOkFbD1CkME9cr3HVdz+429Z8=; b=GEWI+xd9g4pPEwTVSXiErp0+2eW+OYE/hVMy5bDzNFQXbOg7C7jhg5qI+E6KpkqLgV xXgGCEuISjYOGg57dUWKXtb4t+zWaxjzH2obkG+Z15ob1RA191UxMe6+UJbxnQNvrnmd Vas98JxoXbwtQ1AAjV4EZJzdCAHBzeiaHfPARkgfEDZgwVZSG9zJ8sZQknrJjufEz9px DhphFGJ5yXiMH3V0rHB7gbmr9aqDIPalFB4eLyvjhGHFkGMJV3teh109uALtxZvUrWn9 zZKGau+8S/q0W6hIVGt/Mo5O6VEGIedOe7JrtOiGKZO6SFhsToYkpN/A52lX+L1iTwJD eV4A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532TZeKiXC8VNJEj2CVpE5u5KF8AeidbIV3NXAxkacfmir/EmCx6 yF7fayFhqshBld7Q4g700To=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzK6uwXo+xKba1x9SK9u3Rv92UFn+Om06rirAcDc+bYW71fBlHy41p77jj5enULrUm6NdBRnw==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:12cd:: with SMTP id g71mr2064301otg.323.1603205406807;  Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([2603:1036:4:9e::5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 9sm471898otp.72.2020.10.20.07.50.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org>,  "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Thread-Topic: Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-15: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: ATYwODMyDGq9shoyEN3XcOHsjVPoog==
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:50:05 +0000
Message-ID: <DM5PR1901MB21509A59F73A68892C487C77FC1F0@DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
References: <159951430623.22863.13718864765604329236@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RecordReviewCfmType: 0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/p6MUOcczMV5c5cAslgqH_Lfx4so>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:50:09 -0000
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=


From nobody Tue Oct 20 07:51:32 2020
Return-Path: <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12DDC3A0F02; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:51:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ss8Mfxq7u1dd; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32a.google.com (mail-ot1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC2183A0EFB; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id e20so1918698otj.11; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;  h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :references:accept-language:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=xGc6q8CCK839mnqPcvQS2Nq41YhGwROofuuNtyFuQnw=; b=kvKzGcdBsre3o5mmox5Y1hH9+S/XHFzf1BgxCU4iYGJiACbuCJsWv/TxRutZQeRDOI 3yeMrTVitdKHi5s+xpBfno7rc9DAa5G0YJ/vK/AomdM+FuVPULnfK9q4HHLNUu/54TcH YHo+AaZkxhOp9Tcl7WiSKnRT1moZxfHziI8mUVlF2+kdLs865xMLHCRjOcikwNurBuzo jndngbl9cqgqBgSbSDEXRPIxNjpNp72ouFalY5tMAvAp5Evi9AKxIBTsjviudSmXIKXW YE8NKcH3RugmYq5Un7fAWod3B5xvSTskBXcRsgZSqVToqwIPkdKD85S28zw0rdDpHC62 +KaQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:accept-language:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=xGc6q8CCK839mnqPcvQS2Nq41YhGwROofuuNtyFuQnw=; b=jOa+DCYt8goBNCE9vWou0oZx4O/MXDZL5bXA2hT+juLmem3whUhJA51yArJiF81AXV yBNLeMJjsxa5zHqCBxq59GBjjVEVE6w8JnmOtgG+wnt4WUZfsTsQ0bTUb7zZEy+oBM8v PtqfA0YRiB2Y5ODQpTYoxe/w20rG2sWf++Wj/RK38luPfJu8jBzcrVUakt2pR0p4N2QC GJqwo9AkxofQtssO6U9JatxYMUJ3J9MtiOHlxuuuhE8Q2gBNMnkkNCWBRGI6mFbvOFbT kahMUEf50XWs8Ou4DrCKjwekwK5C+nRT1SSItHVftlBoSHl7k0Aw64JcCwwAELOwJIah GnxQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531M9O6pQGMtuuu51tORjA97ENC3C0awkqOEkh+xCVciPCD/IH1X 7l3S4WeyD0JufTv9ZO5V8qprOZW/Uaa+Mw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzgzrFhOqMczjxkd2V8wcGa8puBUPsNa+/l9gYx+lygQVlfXL6dtNau65yo5pzsSUJMS75oyA==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4047:: with SMTP id o7mr2081448oti.49.1603205487838; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([2603:1036:4:9e::5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b6sm491332otl.37.2020.10.20.07.51.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
To: =?utf-8?B?w4lyaWMgVnluY2tl?= <evyncke@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org>,  "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Thread-Topic: =?utf-8?B?w4lyaWMgVnluY2tlJ3MgTm8gT2JqZWN0aW9uIG9uIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtbXBs?= =?utf-8?Q?s-base-yang-15:_(with_COMMENT)?=
Thread-Index: ATE0OTYw/anfZUbjGKZntsFQsdRHiQ==
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:51:25 +0000
Message-ID: <DM5PR1901MB2150C743B204492111B76F07FC1F0@DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
References: <159922962069.27569.5216925492440580221@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RecordReviewCfmType: 0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/bRu-_IAnak_-f2b9UH22SJ2IRK0>
Subject: Re: [mpls]  =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-ietf?= =?utf-8?q?-mpls-base-yang-15=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:51:31 -0000
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From nobody Tue Oct 20 07:57:37 2020
Return-Path: <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A5E3A1096; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X6nir9_4H7MJ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19FB23A0FFB; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id p15so3810689ioh.0; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;  h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :references:accept-language:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=qGSPFPuqhCW0iOkjwGvC0ppV9+8CwupBXuwhvpWY3vw=; b=BbPt0rNRO2K7knkYjj7u1PepfOTH0bNeoBsFTouj8OJC98cKA1fDzmUUMlWVk0sypO /3CgC+Y8LmyGda3HezzK7qKlITPqg8Hrv/PvqtsG5BZpg6/nQ5GQPLtCl0Zt3YzJ6fY3 KL9RsZIN3pfjXcCrg9K4oWLwTgL0wcaiW3JiBOdM832pb+87UydYD42HqCE/gCQAZcHK ue9YuykPyDg44TdZx7JMR8kPTVh/ztD8HkHXhTWYDB0lzjqaO5zu8o12JkOuJmOGC4dm ABFifE+euPzEmBJ/0nYH2MmiZ2Pww43Mpar993nyTSyozEOizOM63LX/KaghJXXk6L+S RuwQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:accept-language:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=qGSPFPuqhCW0iOkjwGvC0ppV9+8CwupBXuwhvpWY3vw=; b=FB6tZh3C9w8HomvyoDwa6G0DCCJJRDFNPBqnj8zbsJVJvH23tQ1mpbNWvaFQT0L04T 3vPx+XWEuMXpjmwOOJjTJDkxnZLMKYoPw0qjCC4B66XB84A/8fLzoX0nGYdnVP4ypS8s l0WxQYsCVPd/GX0J5/wYvcviZFYlKkRP85hHLXyHF8wXqZQqT2NYsqM3Z3igQGw8tvlM CsyQ0JDDfTYSJW+pD2GC6CRJeZ4E6x6zP80AISxDYKbDs4QvN/dRTSWK8RP1RqasXx2W gc+Cr1DrkYCJueEoKyCyXW6lPSHjUJ1XYdpZHRAkJgOOFHt652vGIgx4/xpEUpAS2ezy MdaA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532GTYFNBtV3OTENVAMtYaKRV65CE7SnVKFnifSrkEyANFfN1nJO m3KVMo9QVzBDUtHDb6cvL0M=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzq+az0XHkfhwEKNXDkMWyF3puXPc/AP9nAC+kxmRtiovIY2CU0Ycd90jfBRaiZY98k5pNOCg==
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:93d6:: with SMTP id v205mr2435741iod.188.1603205843211;  Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([2603:1036:4:9e::5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r3sm1852059iog.55.2020.10.20.07.57.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:57:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org>,  "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Thread-Topic: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: ATE2MTQyPDeUIQ36u5VjMYNhXZofQw==
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:57:21 +0000
Message-ID: <DM5PR1901MB215086DD4CC5D76F939D6CBFFC1F0@DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
References: <159973789624.25904.12671134973766580701@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RecordReviewCfmType: 0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/LtOv0O_2lc_Gt4dVfrkvTWFLzWY>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:57:31 -0000
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From nobody Tue Oct 20 07:58:48 2020
Return-Path: <tsaad@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02703A0FC5; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=2IFhfMLq; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=IfruXvC/
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e1LIAvlu3loy; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DE693A0A5E; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108156.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 09KEqdo5008227; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:58:39 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=uSxACxWQevoJH0RS4S1Wf6zUldVIqobj7mS0gmOnqSg=; b=2IFhfMLqeRx7Zzq0v7rd/RNT07wXccyJ7s4oqybl+4SH4+p/hdPM6g+LNQE9ZeZbHwIp fK0JRUZFtXiedHITNdMw3liaW0eQtC4TsWXXL/1pzeORdTHjt3pui4zbi47C9YEAeVbi 4w+52VGtyez4sy3yk+YPhsvK5PFMjFUWe1tk6XK59B7mkp0XjWXCuzPjcC0DS5/BU4hk OUxa5O8GqblgQTHiWYh3SPG25LRjjsovse4ljJFF7HHHEee8KLp+PLnAmIExfY3483rW iA3tae6jlKPnlwpfn0CuWTKusNzX16+FeGbhg9BPm6xYv7xhN8vUAS5I/eNFDabumyWp yA== 
Received: from nam12-dm6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam12lp2168.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.59.168]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 347ympcj2g-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:58:31 -0700
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=GTZNNNT6dL+J8l5i1Y1XgBO4LacIy+iiKPfuNlpq+9spSnYTQaJyxvZsurBTuHLCS5h81scAA/zkBGT8v8UqLY/NGsZ6JoPtkR/EYN305/FBUgB6ebz9oZJgB1OBnTfrZxwj0MIfcEu+TdVtFW6byEHffHP1xhjaC07amQTR1mOOQJ+9PnAXTQQRNE1f/YF9ZmESfSgeDBFS7SBn0jOD/ExOO/rTr9hFiZ7N2VszrK1BbahbcldMiZRD/K/6nhxYqGN+iVAaBt0qr8vyAHdG/j+FCngHOAZ3d2vzRT6JRFgyydKNxBj5q9yxWLE/OuS0VbkzfQauwshY0jszTgAjRQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;  s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=uSxACxWQevoJH0RS4S1Wf6zUldVIqobj7mS0gmOnqSg=; b=F0nZlP7zvf8w2KzoWruHbWJzM9NTm2G48kh8n3QnGjt4x+Wl8SMl7elbO5SoTRiJAYYaicwdXrPq9Kfw1ZdEdTSkcRod86SyvOGadNKQn31v+u+YNZqKrz6RSm5xmA2pwGIyhtNOGrRqiZImI+SYu/ySR22iQQA4W+61C/rbrQ98FuddR/phD58ifkjy90LHmcLNOWmhOm9enr5BAdMP6CvxA8GcopQD5LbyiZ1nYqbrjskabgBpZRmuKTUGpN9xH17qPzPp7qUCCuX+cQsjZf3QQBXC4PWSp9L/5Hw+8vKwD12ds42YiJtMajCIWYxJ6YjNvLqlhb6xyOakuhBnyw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=uSxACxWQevoJH0RS4S1Wf6zUldVIqobj7mS0gmOnqSg=; b=IfruXvC/zo0zGKa7eMjAA5AJ6BSSv5BQt/UfmBmXrxo6T9f41wmye5UbarH63JpizqpgTFQlkw4cP0f7+UIMhkhO4lU2Z5yleVYhyzeclJOrXY47hpV8HVgk4SZ7QLW/f/GOkjEPZMqAHTCypEzQ2o1suckAmoZcn5CK3ZuyUw4=
Received: from BYAPR05MB4136.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a02:85::18) by BYAPR05MB5336.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:7d::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3499.15; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:58:29 +0000
Received: from BYAPR05MB4136.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::692c:3186:2e82:e63c]) by BYAPR05MB4136.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::692c:3186:2e82:e63c%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3499.017; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:58:29 +0000
From: Tarek Saad <tsaad@juniper.net>
To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org>,  "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Thread-Topic: Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-15: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHWhnSTyvgHn4cVUkit8S+cHAc2qamgkvgA
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:58:29 +0000
Message-ID: <AA4CABFA-C04D-427D-816E-DD9ABFD16A62@juniper.net>
References: <159963381999.10059.8824245600086965264@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <159963381999.10059.8824245600086965264@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ContentBits=0; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ActionId=9a7faf17-4132-4e54-bf2a-370dfa52d098; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2020-10-15T15:03:22Z;  MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=Juniper Business Use Only;MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=true;
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.42.20101102
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [2607:fea8:e300:294:f180:a8d9:824b:f271]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 120f422b-8382-48ad-1121-08d875089b51
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR05MB5336:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR05MB5336FC42C96BA39EED16BB67B71F0@BYAPR05MB5336.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:6790;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Et10bWHFtnuEj2CPCDj3SqAOsbnxHEcBQdAZ86KTNWzEagIk+6iC6cgn9G6P0QAP6kLQytKpt9E+++X70geC1VzXxIPvFpAOZRIrvcT6Y9h2yC6LVe2R6FTen2cAG4JTBrgqUYtChmPLmpyRQuIk7+ebyJxP4URhnzJuBSoyrqZFW/hnwYPf7fMl7T2NU7G2OM1hXF17PmoV/v+jhP7pnl1Klc9L/6UDmag/kio69WtgRR3H/awQOeNpUiGd7d2mG5gObWvix8mKk/pIOdNq5hR0ZQ8w2jqEssT94npz3/xMF7091KKaQG931pSg+W9yr1NF6ZA9Quptel/fbwI4ZF+c2ogm2n8RzrgZUQyO41nbiE/QMuuiYOQp+H8uZ23NFPrxIESnsjI2pGGhYRrbwQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:;  IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BYAPR05MB4136.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE;  SFS:(4636009)(366004)(396003)(346002)(136003)(39860400002)(376002)(54906003)(478600001)(36756003)(86362001)(110136005)(316002)(966005)(33656002)(91956017)(6506007)(53546011)(8936002)(6486002)(66946007)(71200400001)(5660300002)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(76116006)(2616005)(6512007)(8676002)(4326008)(186003)(2906002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; 
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <2E18A2879F7D3B4EB56EDA46FF7A22C0@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BYAPR05MB4136.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 120f422b-8382-48ad-1121-08d875089b51
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Oct 2020 14:58:29.8025 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: rtpwacBEcR7trZEfLs35DWI8+KUCyWvkYgFQXjtT3gWgRs2e+vd1PJUqk6yPIepJnU2bqKPhebcfyQZfcJUMVw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR05MB5336
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.737 definitions=2020-10-20_06:2020-10-20, 2020-10-20 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2010200102
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/l-VGaV6u6SkkQDwcP-hdoWL8sDI>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:58:43 -0000
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From nobody Tue Oct 20 07:59:44 2020
Return-Path: <tsaad@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8C93A0FC7; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=lZSJb2m6; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=ExfaMrAx
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L86O9F2a1nsM; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A1743A0FBB; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108157.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 09KEvpU5001127; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:59:39 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=kzrNBWAu5/xd1IqWwDCGXASrC+NGx6LrD3Enwf3/sbQ=; b=lZSJb2m6lch6Le4yzHsXgSjudWnHx5VvoYNpuLvTZyNqRMR4OEMsFrhIWmkueyn9yYLx JasTeFGdL9yD1i9oGyK2/mA9csAUQluvfVeBd2R+XzEQt3rgRaUwwmx3HAE4xLiJfWCb rbWj+ayTJs3KzFVS0UT8kwcRHhGv8iLj+5dix+2v2URqCC6VZZpxUlylb7a1mLT1Vd+f 5dfzFNWFn4mk4wswqJQEJkKHi+Rd4N1gQQ+SIW+FgnrmmbFwDeBeL5Zep8hkjYcbpH2a Nlao/r3C8dYEgJN3QfTOPKO/915Ulp4gXo6Wzm7z3uBin0niCH1ixRuDZvIN4vkcC3Sw NA== 
Received: from nam12-dm6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam12lp2171.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.59.171]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 348xanu5b0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:59:39 -0700
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=PcFSwhKfcTPHkMmuLcJDuNPQ++IJDNqCDGVI+FraaCIVNth1HqIMcAHzTYyfxTE23rmz7QG0B4wEuodWlHuM8svTHHrlaz5MxpSJou7B9K4JDDtrC/sGIxjWQJ1pdv259EL83/f1IyZAZr9jTfkfANFiL8I5TTwsK7m61sbgllwUENOK8XIbgpNVysjycqmLZNlbUxJaHwkRkt2SofOQPBoK4tZrN1YouuMIOgYPeKj6SPeS72AXCG550krtHOWzg7by8sIjQp/4X0QXcdNkTYdLVcWEaOCfTbzauaDqYlKhU1SILXnheusZC4wIBt/gKM583U3UaxZHVhc+PQZnbQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;  s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=kzrNBWAu5/xd1IqWwDCGXASrC+NGx6LrD3Enwf3/sbQ=; b=oDr6lX1YCxhDytFNLfSPIKbS7OXukAP2qWe4nIHFW+aspG75+aCfdR2nSmTAgBy0cuFxgTOATJhfH0cWuoStS2W9Vu3bOvK0qGj2tWvyNxmZsROizNeVnssHfgwz/h9VEtPdQK2+A66VOWqU+ILRvAtpjrk+vMf4qLANe4mwqnqBLSTpQxTcXFM6NAL2kxoXWXA1ynPPpDhmkN2kvtnMpm6Js16/8sAgbUIJCbMZTPK26COKsDqdDByR2N0HwXPAkNHRP5jLDPoO6MQ9Ry2YpLXAEla2YbLOZsWUZcs3lQNPKAEH9Z6tFO5ro/wBN0WL4FmqmF7YKSDMpCObjGDL+Q==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=kzrNBWAu5/xd1IqWwDCGXASrC+NGx6LrD3Enwf3/sbQ=; b=ExfaMrAxUWwTou3cIbz0UCVFxDUY6wAHXUUfTFBSBu4Z+ZYO6343jFSeejIIRyRHh6eavbU6sO9D6twMlMkxLcnn7lSVxSL38g+etQy1amG+UolEGnuoj8xWzfCR7TD675OVsGYt9EGuMD1BXO1w/+HRbWf8tIOMno98famF5Zc=
Received: from BYAPR05MB4136.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a02:85::18) by BYAPR05MB5336.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:7d::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3499.15; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:59:37 +0000
Received: from BYAPR05MB4136.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::692c:3186:2e82:e63c]) by BYAPR05MB4136.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::692c:3186:2e82:e63c%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3499.017; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:59:37 +0000
From: Tarek Saad <tsaad@juniper.net>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org>,  "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Thread-Topic: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHWhjCVjZMiKpH5A0uvkvYBpvncN6mYuzQA
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:59:37 +0000
Message-ID: <2F4A57DA-DD04-4F1D-8310-7EB688E15AE8@juniper.net>
References: <159960462265.21015.6727119911072959300@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <159960462265.21015.6727119911072959300@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ContentBits=0; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ActionId=99789c49-8728-4e43-b719-cdd8e3201123; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2020-10-15T15:09:11Z;  MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=Juniper Business Use Only;MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=true;
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.42.20101102
authentication-results: cert.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cert.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [2607:fea8:e300:294:f180:a8d9:824b:f271]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6a0feee7-1524-487c-f11c-08d87508c3c8
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR05MB5336:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR05MB5336608917772C57E2E1863EB71F0@BYAPR05MB5336.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:3968;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: nQmvlQYlnH5p4cGdE/N9xtZPiSMgC/yDgYGFHLDrT8OdsuK8ZmigKkImPqatSlfRH1CIrRXcvgxMkAKS77WhhaM5ebyqJZXkM4eZWZ6YKdFTv06luGY+Ea+CK2jvtx5U+Qloyu3l/qfht9ejcvouY01iRtBJ4zutMpFJdv8ZWw1rrKwHznRqD4pS8C3IZjFdZm2V7g1eHzjNV9CewDmvkVz3lNNkufZtNvTtEsjoKcpmOn3pb+1Bj7J26OqJcDzb1l/hfWpxejGojmT6ZV/wHhaatn+t40Yubpuo85fAPN4NGs6g7lD5obFB30dJUMfKaF393hdI+drUhZe+Bw9XSfWQavilwayD5Z11j9Ex1r+uSSMtOAaI/ayZrggQd1NL/iaqakQsPpbT+Cm91093iA==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:;  IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BYAPR05MB4136.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE;  SFS:(4636009)(366004)(396003)(346002)(136003)(39860400002)(376002)(54906003)(478600001)(36756003)(86362001)(110136005)(316002)(966005)(33656002)(91956017)(6506007)(53546011)(8936002)(6486002)(66946007)(71200400001)(5660300002)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(76116006)(2616005)(6512007)(8676002)(4326008)(186003)(2906002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; 
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <AD07EE280ABD4E4995AC56EFE47AC9B8@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BYAPR05MB4136.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6a0feee7-1524-487c-f11c-08d87508c3c8
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Oct 2020 14:59:37.6560 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: v5/mJVrbSHVshZPKXf3P32JNZa/YVk95trx+IHotk5pKXqW6WloZ65G6+2DlKZ6RMpAZoIo0nAwC5uAF28y5bQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR05MB5336
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.737 definitions=2020-10-20_06:2020-10-20, 2020-10-20 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2010200102
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/dp2tbCTeccixIqFST87RbObsOSs>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:59:43 -0000
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From nobody Tue Oct 20 08:01:19 2020
Return-Path: <tsaad@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2D83A1193; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=ukDPSX1+; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=Z3W6j86O
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oPjvC0c1E6as; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:01:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59EEA3A124E; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108163.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 09KEvFDA018778; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:00:41 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=5PJA9h5LY26oHmcbMSl9h6Ne+1S8Lk1lAUv4dl7hLIA=; b=ukDPSX1+GRb6/82HCNksaNwUi4VlK+HpelcDGZHHfEJhAAGjah85LLCnFdEHJ1Y1CKVz gMmEk8uGxA87z1SkDdQUsStAzI/H/ah5ehviymKneFf3WIcOynWi6OhdmSeCVRORycub e9iQgcVOGcDXW8/PiUT9RBQ+yKWya71T02unkYeFtqJ2tW+/tZc5nUHLCS+xPApkh+vB Fl5T33F2xq7VVdPVKNUBfwP9nWFe2wz0VPGbhs1jzyWDIxUeK7MYx16jNkTWmyVFiy5s W0AVOqtZilXj8F2knwMsaClyJxdnjJGn8IZTcZw3gVhYBa62LeVlpii5haVaYJzrT0ub ZQ== 
Received: from nam12-dm6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam12lp2177.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.59.177]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 349n7jh4ar-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:00:40 -0700
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=na9UIex1qEFU9AJiIwdWuy4f4CGaJaknYIdvsgRuU47Eug++Ysy53sHPgrFzUc+i9rri0Dxj2BgE7so/RPXVg7UYWA/SX8BpotILip9au4yNTgZbX89YRb1oY1UzOU6Q53A3IosbkWnaNM3jqPuW4OFNZqhk/8L8y/0hOkNghArcbUtgS0y0prmPr0EwJdFSQAaWGMD931ZjcvWMHmQGR2hXYb7vAgIy0JJLSMHjqpOJv6mNY187GrHOflUITuv2/sl5Cre9YoT1eOba8+8NcoHlxvFdsXj0hvWeQ/Zlfh9W+hNzH0kJyeyZPnpVj9ZHP9A0yO8MNiyKkR+UzTGApQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;  s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=5PJA9h5LY26oHmcbMSl9h6Ne+1S8Lk1lAUv4dl7hLIA=; b=k/j+fxSY85GbdV4sEX0+Yyett3KqivrkT1nw+o3b6IyyIcp3bqYjCPtXn8lwgS93lJHvGeqnlijEu3qGAv1SFA3vcigMMFlDcfHJ5Cnf++mk9xTChgjS3KTgyMjScEEQBqbFA5i5DRM95/8ajjPFgxXA7C7Kc9BZ86rxw9FUjNJ58eIgVqNmVp8yFjiv4Fy4zgjQ36DIIljh1occMvtD6kgSvl55flbk1P1vLi7nErwJpA8HipuZ8FGsNlArz1TomO+bJYRZ1vUTo4kVsi2Vx/OQhmpdIgJO+ce3JS8qY3vbZLxYmfhUsg1F3wjET4YhyYPEB/LDfzt0mrakrhRVMA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=5PJA9h5LY26oHmcbMSl9h6Ne+1S8Lk1lAUv4dl7hLIA=; b=Z3W6j86OEwV42X6OqSbdvcu112fnkH5j62OH6rTu2ar53i0OTJM5a86xZAcahT8LWsqPveff0loggn894XxHFipnFxPW/zs22UPybt3QxZYclBtzBQKWSO6YjPBRT9whtVEOy8Lzrudp7y8sxGg8RFIzZfCoINnAQRTAB86YpEk=
Received: from BYAPR05MB4136.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a02:85::18) by BYAPR05MB5336.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:7d::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3499.15; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:00:39 +0000
Received: from BYAPR05MB4136.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::692c:3186:2e82:e63c]) by BYAPR05MB4136.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::692c:3186:2e82:e63c%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3499.017; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:00:39 +0000
From: Tarek Saad <tsaad@juniper.net>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org>,  "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Thread-Topic: Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-15: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHWgmodypInqcdpvEaV01+b2U46NqmYxUuA
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:00:38 +0000
Message-ID: <1BD7A3EB-3E0F-4486-9546-D1D10277F7DC@juniper.net>
References: <159918952766.22871.7919987633152182273@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <159918952766.22871.7919987633152182273@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ContentBits=0; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ActionId=74b51968-2cd9-4607-af2b-f5e05d7ee1eb; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2020-10-15T15:12:30Z;  MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=Juniper Business Use Only;MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=true;
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.42.20101102
authentication-results: computer.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;computer.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [2607:fea8:e300:294:f180:a8d9:824b:f271]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: bea26d34-8a03-4528-2f5e-08d87508e859
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR05MB5336:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR05MB533624CD37EB0E92400AF949B71F0@BYAPR05MB5336.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:6108;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 9oIulT9AtTn0OJFG+0YXniUmvXGG28Z6Gj13lFvd8rIatG8JIS0XtCJTIJxrk8CAgk1LoJCUsIXa+g/iMyExXkKCMH2dl2ZRsGa18HmGqecixZhc9CbAK7wZakiTkabecAYRkczmaDOBUDGY+cmyCBhKpKpAbfwJlBiqMDTh8RxfhiKuzFVxXlhq1FiPPMupJYDvLeD6HcAiPQLW39IIYfTq30vbezEif2UZX66fdkGmG+pinK4ldr/5HQApbIraTK/RuR2MVP+1dcevUXXTDh4DL3eHy8CkM6jrr1CCvEcesX66BcWkplWPib3N4MOprA1fS+Z15Cus4WtgnHoLydRIGtWcJqrCV+q5+fzTvX/exM4ljv4QRmiFMGCc0Z1MWcHobrfHUZeBVAPB4FRhGA==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:;  IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BYAPR05MB4136.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE;  SFS:(4636009)(366004)(396003)(346002)(136003)(39860400002)(376002)(54906003)(478600001)(36756003)(86362001)(110136005)(316002)(966005)(33656002)(91956017)(6506007)(53546011)(8936002)(6486002)(66946007)(71200400001)(5660300002)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(76116006)(2616005)(6512007)(8676002)(4326008)(186003)(2906002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; 
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <510B4D8D5CA069488168B74CE9368879@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BYAPR05MB4136.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: bea26d34-8a03-4528-2f5e-08d87508e859
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Oct 2020 15:00:38.9743 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: iTn3S1KNfkkKsHPc/833pzOHubdavPdwgmBhluAiJSEqYwk+LQvTIXNIJhm4bXo5ftLJAacPK4pO9srg9qxoRQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR05MB5336
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.737 definitions=2020-10-20_06:2020-10-20, 2020-10-20 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=717 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1011 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2010200102
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/BW0IqYjmXHXR8N6ha8bOhVcfR7U>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:01:14 -0000
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From nobody Tue Oct 20 08:02:01 2020
Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D673A0FD8; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.601
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=dgdeQaNx; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=H2KTjOMd
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PzS1mBtsqcEF; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FBD13A1174; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3244; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1603206076; x=1604415676; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=8bZplOlsZZeR2cXDJAoK4UxZEwl8Jo/KSBGh6aVMzeI=; b=dgdeQaNxz99WonY/PVVG82VLXM+oBxzjUfv7QlsWmxbMwhrAhOIeEinG HdOA9+zZl3L2VG9aq72auSw6pltUBaz4Cd3ngNTMmpUHpNqZqxMtY6XHf ZOJ3FvbLQkPPP+85RLZNjvKKczDAUnXW9xQxw0VjEYA5oq1+Mb7cf/4aA g=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3A8r/vCRWWYcQ2uBHe4KVFu77ttXXV8LGuZFwc94?= =?us-ascii?q?YnhrRSc6+q45XlOgnF6O5wiEPSBNyHuf1BguvS9avnXD9I7ZWAtSUEd5pBH1?= =?us-ascii?q?8AhN4NlgMtSMiCFQXgLfHsYiB7eaYKVFJs83yhd0QAHsH4ag7dp3Sz6XgZHR?= =?us-ascii?q?CsfQZwL/7+T4jVicn/3uuu+prVNgNPgjf1Yb57IBis6wvLscxDiop5IaF3wR?= =?us-ascii?q?zM8XY=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AoCQA++45f/51dJa1gHgEBCxIMQIF?= =?us-ascii?q?EC4FSUQdwWS8sgTODCoNJA41ShSuEZY5qgUKBEQNVCwEBAQ0BASMKAgQBAQ+?= =?us-ascii?q?EOwIXgW4CJTcGDgIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEGBG2FYQyFcgEBAQEDEhERDAEBNwE?= =?us-ascii?q?LBAIBCA4DAwECAwImAgICHxEVBQMIAgQBDQUigwQBgksDLgEOpCkCgTmIaHa?= =?us-ascii?q?BMoMEAQEFgTcCDkGDGg0LghADBoEOKoJyg3CCKRuEEhuBQT+BESccgk0+ghp?= =?us-ascii?q?CAQEBAgGBJgESASGDFzOCLJAwMIJ0o1xUCoJqiQSMYwSFCQMfgxaKDZQ3hFm?= =?us-ascii?q?OYIp0gm2SUwIEAgQFAg4BAQWBaiRnWBEHcBVlAYI+UBcCDY4fg3GEWTuFQnQ?= =?us-ascii?q?CNgIGAQkBAQMJAXuNTAEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,397,1596499200"; d="scan'208";a="602856760"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 20 Oct 2020 15:00:58 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 09KF0v9u005989 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:00:57 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:00:57 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:00:56 -0500
Received: from NAM12-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:00:56 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=bXiloZrqbJtemxTT4pDPAKvcc7sYQdFa4tIXGIeYvx4f3JJ2icEzRft9DXZAzrMfACMXkWx6fUBpjCXqGWums8QeTmOa4+iRIv20zdW9brTIf2TRmf3ij+8ImuaLYaLfCNbNuOSE6om836d0OnglnjHqhUMVDA62NDLN4NUoHB2koglTTE+WZhW31cAui0ZVaJBcLEy267qkFbWBD2IpOWF4DpxRHVd/Cacv8XayoO2Z0cZeCNtcyY3Gsu2pcyEvNFoxESVPTWFwBlQ6Jco+GABw2wLgMSYw0DPi96GT1n1SUkiVQ+9ZroHdYWD+t/kqWAypzH5HTeKfQ8PgRB1AoQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;  s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=8bZplOlsZZeR2cXDJAoK4UxZEwl8Jo/KSBGh6aVMzeI=; b=mlPY3UD8swaZCdNt1G1Izl64CKsWkkLX2Km1KAOuAyQ35zKqIbZ17vB8MfsYEl0bBG86cbXUh9aIFkiN7RmpSRb5ZQaxSIcwPqb1A09TvAm26oFWMaf40AvTjFGv1lGiTG1MsN8Mq31TOWJXsAh5hRqN/yw24j8fzuryPAtpvlf7bDx3Sm3853K+6oKKm0b8eir8LAyCVLPpHEiqW2vwftYnWp61AfX38JXJ9+/pdQGY/uZUO/HxxlAqUqVxh1xUAY9qZWSfHTOHDtttLOhsq4FKbQxFfsvjY0PdhFqfmbwVtAB/dW82u3rUGA4sPbHwRi9SrunXQrZyjuATrUBTTg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com;  s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=8bZplOlsZZeR2cXDJAoK4UxZEwl8Jo/KSBGh6aVMzeI=; b=H2KTjOMdpU6usJ+6kYTL2QeFN688fLLp4q5R7Z1zW4Ar3q52V+6xAmz9NjrjRTH7l8F4tBs9UuhDm2nUAi/q1Sst25ktEO8A0rEMTC3QnyEgIAFWEbEhXVYdTuuSgF2eEESG4SLvDmpVxghNZSfyVy2WVMfgtEYseAuRUfOzWQM=
Received: from PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:42::21) by PH0PR11MB4773.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:33::7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3477.20; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:00:55 +0000
Received: from PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::453b:b2f5:ec29:410d]) by PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::453b:b2f5:ec29:410d%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3499.018; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:00:55 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org>,  "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Thread-Topic: =?utf-8?B?w4lyaWMgVnluY2tlJ3MgTm8gT2JqZWN0aW9uIG9uIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtbXBs?= =?utf-8?Q?s-base-yang-15:_(with_COMMENT)?=
Thread-Index: ATE0OTYw/anfZUbjGKZntsFQsdRHicrlkrgA
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:00:55 +0000
Message-ID: <1FDFC434-75B2-4C23-830C-F577884D6A6F@cisco.com>
References: <159922962069.27569.5216925492440580221@ietfa.amsl.com> <DM5PR1901MB2150C743B204492111B76F07FC1F0@DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM5PR1901MB2150C743B204492111B76F07FC1F0@DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.42.20101102
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c1:36:d454:21a3:d38d:7d90]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 867b63e9-c10d-48f1-0293-08d87508f229
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: PH0PR11MB4773:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <PH0PR11MB4773B812AE3EDAF4FA78BB68A91F0@PH0PR11MB4773.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 69V8eDlejC6iqAOUtXFBJuohXDNYk5dDclgddXvN6haumgLEbqNQBybB2bC4+RyIVcImWa6Hc93c6KhclEfbC8IBUp8fv7sZNHlVDkbFJg2mmyq/gvubYcKUmEvv+0NhviFifU5b9X45VAbstFQgU8gBsgSx219QyeuMSVFeYwgvdgcqy10lAH7BY/FiuvxFzB5bP+irjh1cXX0VEq5KhiSATC1nMZvhpYc9SwN8h53IUtYlNt/4Cf9Kzkw3dJH6n65WxYAr7h3vonvTjXD5A5cPdrbSmiqoJ5mb6GNwBTge8qYnBHrtPaZTikOZ5Huz/vjlaT/MjJo8PbRl8AWTbHCAZwfKeA++dU9pCji8M+qYM6AUXhCbbds1AiJyQTaUjS96arFx3trInGd7EXkU4A==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:;  IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE;  SFS:(376002)(346002)(396003)(39860400002)(366004)(136003)(110136005)(71200400001)(4326008)(478600001)(966005)(83380400001)(54906003)(2906002)(86362001)(36756003)(66556008)(66446008)(66946007)(8936002)(224303003)(91956017)(76116006)(6486002)(186003)(6506007)(53546011)(316002)(33656002)(5660300002)(2616005)(66476007)(64756008)(6512007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; 
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <BD7095DE57D3A3438E7E8C1576B5A4B3@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 867b63e9-c10d-48f1-0293-08d87508f229
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Oct 2020 15:00:55.5210 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: RWLXG9GAIFZdVVz05muzRkR2I6vA/G3hsPzBzJWfulQMg0JwTbY9cLezyMYmIy5cKZGSpQLmD+Tr/lJRTAxVhg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PH0PR11MB4773
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.13, xch-aln-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-6.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/EyYHTsRaw9TcJU2iK8WOsuMjHHU>
Subject: Re: [mpls]  =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-ietf?= =?utf-8?q?-mpls-base-yang-15=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:01:57 -0000
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From nobody Tue Oct 20 08:30:30 2020
Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CBF03A10F4; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MEPI3EztfW1F; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from veto.sei.cmu.edu (veto.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42F383A10F1; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by veto.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 09KFULII018529; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:30:21 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 veto.sei.cmu.edu 09KFULII018529
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1603207822; bh=pkbjTaYtPbP+p4Aer5XssYwc3VPHPyZBcJcFGlPJ6Mc=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OHPrIptjvfLI2wGVcVFzWNOfBZnj8boXV6a6fg56bPaUIGJ367/mw0cR7BKu2B+HH Zsx00Z3TYFZhR4U+yIuWDXCY2AJpg5AK3mmQySwtGBI6Afh0NjaE6GHqsu29zaLWN3 cG0WGTlgcaDheHeGn00h/H4ZNBka2QAa9R99fYi4=
Received: from MURIEL.ad.sei.cmu.edu (muriel.ad.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.47]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 09KFUKoH007614; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:30:20 -0400
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.46) by MURIEL.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:30:20 -0400
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([fe80::555b:9498:552e:d1bb]) by MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([fe80::555b:9498:552e:d1bb%13]) with mapi id 15.01.1979.003; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:30:20 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: Tarek Saad <tsaad@juniper.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org>,  "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Thread-Topic: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHWhjCcb45lJ2uDfkaPrMQHl+4qQKmhGe6A///FYRA=
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:30:18 +0000
Message-ID: <98db385b64984be28adcb10f6ff59c33@cert.org>
References: <159960462265.21015.6727119911072959300@ietfa.amsl.com> <2F4A57DA-DD04-4F1D-8310-7EB688E15AE8@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <2F4A57DA-DD04-4F1D-8310-7EB688E15AE8@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.64.203.69]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/2WafkfrQ1hHy_FQVrjzkpuJS8Kg>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:30:25 -0000
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From nobody Wed Oct 21 11:29:00 2020
Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26243A1224; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IR3T1_OXlaon; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-f180.google.com (mail-vk1-f180.google.com [209.85.221.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 019C83A120A; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-f180.google.com with SMTP id n189so731280vkb.3; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mHuSv7sPTNxnu7k9wGTQI3cbgwGxIE09o6Qy7quAN9s=; b=MZFOJIFa58Lxnxoc7XGq5vL5c7MVRe2GWW/NqTju6Zc4EIRbCRAcnyAbwttoMayBCA 33Pp2SCXtPLqXd1u+dgHThk88FHcK2vw8rfFOtHTyiQ44CtcddVbwktpmPfSWIR2l6SA NdDtA58TIBnNsEgRd/jbC1vWer+8KlG5b39r9EXure+QcaKmFM8Cceu7rQqriEIUisfr RvGKUveXzeOvBPssgAwR9cHdPwxQrb0Q1Wxa9+TwsdFezoKA6e+BC3vATO75JW3K+aKL wBWq6Q7sqLiGi06prZ9tcVJRZLeJQKt0YRf1bagf3G+MyLUqVfuBgPUoP1guQY2gcJbl 6cHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531HaAI4XhvdOQOFUyuBxBRSY4mReGwgcRRX6jOLlkUsXUluXvLI x1OynoEYw761ZwdX9eOnNK7d7NOMJaqX7+RMHAzthaAdCq8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzBA5XJZrDdFwIXuTEACpBuHZQGxUEdogEdlaMdLjZsLyFFWBOwOWFKvvw94rRYHVnzmoJR6fmWn00dZyd0NCE=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:78e:: with SMTP id k14mr3077282vkr.23.1603304932644;  Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159918952766.22871.7919987633152182273@ietfa.amsl.com> <1BD7A3EB-3E0F-4486-9546-D1D10277F7DC@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <1BD7A3EB-3E0F-4486-9546-D1D10277F7DC@juniper.net>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:28:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+sET=7pjAS=+=mDgwK+nXsDKdWup2LSaku7b13OWdCBg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tarek Saad <tsaad@juniper.net>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>,  "draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org>,  "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/6Z20kthdmGbW_4xHMihGWZ12Nvc>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:28:56 -0000

Thanks, Tarek.

Barry

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 11:00 AM Tarek Saad <tsaad@juniper.net> wrote:
>
> Thanks Barry for your thorough review and comments. We have posted rev -1=
6 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-16)  of the docume=
nt and have addressed all your comments.
> Please see inline for responses=E2=80=A6 [TS]
>
> On 9/3/20, 11:18 PM, "Barry Leiba via Datatracker" <noreply@ietf.org> wro=
te:
>
>     [External Email. Be cautious of content]
>
>
>     Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
>     draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-15: No Objection
>
>     When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>     email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut th=
is
>     introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>     Please refer to https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/iesg=
/statement/discuss-criteria.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!VoJLrKKmaM1UHV_t0IgMn7LUqo=
-Bad0ISmXXYQJ3wv77doalWhBZ-vw5DGJFsQ$
>     for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
>     The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>     https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ie=
tf-mpls-base-yang/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!VoJLrKKmaM1UHV_t0IgMn7LUqo-Bad0ISmXXYQJ3=
wv77doalWhBZ-vyojA8JRg$
>
>
>
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
>     COMMENT:
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
>
>     The document sometimes says =E2=80=9CYANG model=E2=80=9D and sometime=
s =E2=80=9CYANG module=E2=80=9D.  It
>     should use the correct term and be consistent, no?
> [TS]: thanks, we acted on this comment and normalized use of YANG data mo=
del and YANG module.
>
>     I note that there is BCP 14 boilerplate here but no BCP 14 key words =
in the
>     document.  The shepherd writeup notes that also and says that the she=
pherd
>     wanted to discuss this with the authors... but there is no resolution=
 to that.
>     Did the shepherd discuss it with the authors?  Should some =E2=80=9Cm=
ust=E2=80=9Ds become
>     =E2=80=9CMUST=E2=80=9Ds?  Or should the boilerplate and references be=
 removed?
> [TS]: we removed BCP 14 boilerplate.
>
>     =E2=80=94 Section 1 =E2=80=94
>
>        The MPLS base model also defines a new instance of the generic RIB
>        model as defined in {!RFC8349}} to store native MPLS routes.
>
>     What is the notation around RFC8349?  Does it mean something, or is i=
t a markup
>     artifact that needs to be fixed during editing?
> [TS]: this is markup that needed fixing. Fixed now.
>
> Regards,
> Tarek
>
>
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only


From nobody Wed Oct 21 15:20:44 2020
Return-Path: <kireeti.kompella@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83DCE3A0A92; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.098
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ReENQt2e4JKD; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32e.google.com (mail-ot1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 579453A0A88; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id f10so3345707otb.6; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;  h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=g/7ThCu12c9DWT9jFB06QgBk+H2BnJgL/DbQCdYhNJ8=; b=nvyehr5guMJtDxdZXn3VOORxtXckoe1vS7CIWWf8eH7myxkDgN1RtrmO6O0Hc/XN7/ LJIoo2TvzVIDl9shaWg+xQ6W7TMVc6kcrvs3I/Xi5PYDqPjudMsVorb0NfkCPDAbX/kF fsF0EHaQVsiwxxhqiVLubQx7lXpx2mXZQ4MkkhrFK14E6y7eb8ngm2W5R2/N6K4PM+qS nAKWB5vKIpywuaKeEaDCvJZi4bQ2upQO2qlvP1J6G9dtm1Q5Jc8R1vsGObfdFuntNwbK uK910SqSzp1B/3n3erywg/QIBZtA3pWZMDSFqSXoNoBcnRPGV3KRGkApHVK+8Mlc4t33 QHsA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=g/7ThCu12c9DWT9jFB06QgBk+H2BnJgL/DbQCdYhNJ8=; b=FA44oyGiIN2KVrSBX+IYJkFGipJZ0kW/uzXODqp/MMMZ8tZNGY4mexw0WXg5Szvh2w tI5ELwMRRQ5SFwwqx8d0+7sk2iAG9ucZOKc9FbZ0B0sqdeyPyoHlP1eIszYWRNADT0Lu aIb5oaIWDiepA/O9RiHxARNKyO3oOCWfKnrCO0SG/MFO+4PRwYXebl9EC3ByxhWhyXjk yoWuMusjhacTHD7v5a3lUX7l1h4OeodV2ZcVAmzQkTjlRu9AOlFN84jDQcQOCE1yz8h4 ta+djYI6ig4WjuQSjbcnW24KnSnXtEMkdQ2qDAkn+aAvxPHk4w/nZlx23Am1mrd/AsSv wjAw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532WbXhA/5lp6j3fWgZnTX4WXpRQqJWhJJUO/aMw0/kpYTZPl/vG f8p8UJ/04FfpYyTugGhHFlI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw2Z85c+t8J8vUTPGwCDpYxInVqpcvW1Pfs/N8Aua1f0As1WJj55xZsts412Ps3UfWwbkJQ7A==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1347:: with SMTP id r7mr4182630otq.172.1603318840568;  Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:1702:1d00:1dd0:9df0:4017:e396:4651? ([2600:1702:1d00:1dd0:9df0:4017:e396:4651]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u125sm1104800oif.21.2020.10.21.15.20.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti.kompella@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b0453453-b7c9-ed06-f359-459137ad4c2a@pi.nu>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:20:38 -0700
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-rmr@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-rmr@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, Deborah A Brungard <db3546@att.com>, "mpls-ads@ietf.org" <mpls-ads@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <D6BE2613-9DB8-4A0A-A892-2F198E31EE11@gmail.com>
References: <b0453453-b7c9-ed06-f359-459137ad4c2a@pi.nu>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (17G68)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/PQUXX5VMS3hriZKG5He9wSNYgB0>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Document (draft-ietf-mpls-rmr) returned to working group - poll for interest.
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:20:43 -0000

Hi Loa,

To your questions:
- I think this document is of interest; we have implemented a prototype, and=
 seen interest from SPs, and done some demos.
- there is not much further work needed as all the previous directorate revi=
ews have been addressed (of course, a new WGLC/IETF LC may uncover some new n=
its/comments).

Said as a co-author on the draft.
Kireeti=20

> On Oct 2, 2020, at 09:04, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:
>=20
> =EF=BB=BFWorking Group,
>=20
> This mail starts a two week poll to establish the interest to continue wor=
k on draft-ietf-mpls-rmr.
>=20
> draft-ietf-mpls-rmr were returned to the working to the working group (abo=
ut 2 weeks ago).
>=20
> Normally a document is returned this late in the process when a necessary c=
hange is discovered that requires working group consensus (i.e. a wglc) to i=
mplement. This time the document were returned due to lack of (or very slow)=
 response to directorate or the IESG reviews.
>=20
> When a document is returned for a well defined technical change it is fair=
ly easy to handle, we make the change and do a wglc.
>=20
> I have spent time trying to figure out what to do in a case like this. The=
re is very little information in our process document. The wg chairs has con=
verged on the following small process.
>=20
> - establish wg interest for the document, i.e. is this something we want t=
o do and do we have interest participating in progressing the document.
> - leave approximately 2 weeks for working group discussion
> - wglc
> - when comments from the wglc is resolved, redo the publication request
>=20
> This document start a two week poll to establish the level of interest to c=
ontinue to work on draft-ietf-mpls-rmr.
>=20
> Please answer the following 2 questions:
>=20
> - do you think draft-ietf-mpls-rmr is need and will actually be deployed?
>=20
> - do you have the cycles to contribute to progressing the document
>=20
> /Loa
> for the working group chairs
>=20
>=20
> --=20
>=20
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64


From nobody Thu Oct 22 11:06:38 2020
Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E000B3A098B for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 11:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.63
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.63 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aNFcc1yBles9 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 11:06:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.icann.org (smtp01.icann.org [192.0.33.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C75AB3A098A for <mpls@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 11:06:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp01.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A8EE07EC; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:06:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A5F4E20534; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:06:32 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: michelle.cotton
From: "Michelle Cotton via RT" <iana-issues-comment@iana.org>
Reply-To: iana-issues-comment@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-21295-1603389173-719.1180946-9-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1180946@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-21295-1603389173-719.1180946-9-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-13899-1603389992-1633.1180946-9-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1180946
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: michelle.cotton@icann.org
CC: loa@pi.nu, mpls@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:06:32 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/9_Uo6k30WF_A9MAJWxEixMgKPKo>
Subject: [mpls] [IANA #1180946] Early Review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:06:36 -0000

Loa,

I've taken a look at version 04 of this document.
Below you will find my comments with [MC]. I've pointed out some typos too.

Overall, the document seems to provide clear instructions on what IANA needs to change in the registries (both in registration procedures and specific changes to the registrations).

We'll do an official review when it goes through IETF Last Call.
Let us know if you have any further questions.

Thanks,
Michelle




1.  Introduction

   When RFC 8029 [RFC8029] was published it contained updates to the
   "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs)
   Ping Parameters" IANA name space [IANA-LSP-PING].

   RFC 8611 [RFC8611] updated the LSP Ping IANA registries to match RFC
   8029.  This document further clarifies the entries in those
   registries and makes the definitions more precise.

   This document updates RFC 8029 [[RFC8029] and RFC 8611 [RFC8611] by
   updating two groups of registries as follows:

[MC] Question: Will we be replacing the RFC8029 and RFC8611 references with this document or adding this document as an additional reference?

   First the registries for Message Types [IANA-MT], Reply Modes
   [IANA-RM] and Return Codes [IANA-RC] are updated.  The changes to
   these registries are minor.

   Second, this document updates the TLV and sub-TLV registries.

   o  TLVs [IANA-TLV-reg].

   o  Sub-TLVs for TLVs 1, 16 and 21 [IANA-Sub-1-16-21].

   o  Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 6 [IANA-Sub-6].

   o  Sub-TLVs for TLV 11 [IANA-Sub-11].

   o  Sub-TLVs for TLV 20 [IANA-Sub-20].

   o  Sub-TLVs for TLV 23 [IANA-Sub-23].

   o  Sub-TLVs for TLV 27 [IANA-Sub-27].

   The registry for sub-TLVs for TLV 9 [IANA-Sub-9] is not updated.

   Third, some code points (TLVs and sub-TLVs) are "mandatory" or
   "optional".  Contrary to how other RFCs use these words, indicating
   that it is mandatory or optional to include the code points in a
   message, RFC 8029 uses these words to indicate that an action might
   or might not be necessary.  This document updates RFC 8029 to drop
   the words "mandatory" and "optional", and the text is changed to
   focus on what should be done.

1.2.  Terminology Used in this Document

   This docuemtment uses some terms that relates to IANA registries in
   this way:

[MC] Typo “document”

      IANA Name Space,
      a name space is a top level registry.  An exasmple could be
      "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs)
      Ping Parameters" [IANA-LSP-PING].  A name space is most often a
      contaimer for regiistries that hold code points that share some
      affinity.

[MC] Typo “example”, “container”, “registries”

      IANA Registry,
      an IANA registry holds code points, and lists the registration
      procedures and allocation of code points these code points.  One
      example would be the "TLVs" registry [IANA-TLV-reg].

      IANA Sub-registry,
      a sub-registry is used when a code point allocated in a registry
      need code points scoped by that or a set of code points.  An
      example of a sunregistry thast holds code points for more than one
      TLV is "Sub-TLVs for TLV Types 1, 16, and 21" [IANA-Sub-1-16-21]

[MC] Typo “Sub registry”, “that”

2.  Updating the Message Types, Reply Mode and Return Codes Registries

   The following changes are made to the Message Types, Reply Modes and
   Return Codes [IANA-MT] registries.

   o  In the listing of assiged code points the term "Vendor Private
      Use" is changed to "Private Use".

[MC] Typo “Assigned”

   o  The registration procedure "Specification Required" is changed to
      "RFC Required" and the note "Experimental RFC needed" is removed.

   o  A small set of code points (4 code points) for Experimental Use is
      added by reducing the range for "RFC Required" range.

   o  The registration procedures "Private Use" and "Experimental Use"
      are added to the table of registration procedures.

   o  A note "Not to be assigned" is added for the registration
      procedures "Private Use" and "Experimental Use".

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

   o  In the lists that capture the assignment status, the fields that
      are reserved, i.e.  0 (zero), Private Use and Experimental Use are
      clearly marked as such.

      *  Note that in the Return Codes registry [IANA-RC] registry the
         code point "0" has already been assigned.  This assignment is
         not changed and in this registry the code point "0" continues
         to be assigned as "No Return Code".

   The new Registration Procedures, the registry layouts and the new
   assignments for these registries are found in Section 6.1.

3.  Updating the TLV and Sub-TLV Registries

3.1.  General Principles for the LSP Ping TLV and Sub-TLV registries

   The following principles apply to the processing of any TLV from any
   of the LSP Ping TLV and sub-TLV IANA registries.

   o  All TLVs and sub-TLVs with a type in the range 0-32767 require a
      response if they are not recognized.

   o  All TLVs and sub-TLVs in the range 32768-65535 may be silently
      dropped, stepped over or an error message sennt if they are not
      recognized.

[MC] Typo “sent”

   The range of each TLV and sub-TLV registry is divided into two
   blocks, one with a range from 0 to 32767 for TLVs and sub-TLVs that
   require a response if not recognized.  The other block has the range
   from 32768 to 65535 for TLVs and sub-TLVs that may be silently
   dropped, stepped over or an error message sent, if not recognized.

   Each of the blocks has code point spaces with the following
   registration procedures:

   o  Standards Action.

   o  RFC Required.

   o  Experimental Use.

   o  First come, first served (FCFS).

   The exact defintions of these procedures are found in [RFC8126].

[MC] Typo “definitions”

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

3.1.1.  Unrecognized Experimental Use TLVs and Sub-TLVs

   Unrecognized TLVs and sub-TLVs in the Experimetal Use, and FCFS
   ranges are handled as any other unrecognized TLV or sub-TLV.

[MC] Typo “Experimental”

   o  If the unrecognized TLV or sub-TLV is from the Experimental Use
      range (37140-37143) or from the FCFS range (31744-32767) a the
      Return Code of 2 ("One or more of the TLVs was not understood")
      will be sent in the echo response.

   o  If the unrecognized TLV or sub-TLV is from the Experimental Use
      range (64508-64511).  or from the FCFS range (64512-65535) the
      TLVs may be silently ignored, stepped over or an error message
      sent.

   The IETF does not prescribe how recognized or unrecognized
   Experimental Use and Private Use TLVs and sub-TLVs are handled in
   experimental or private networks, that is up to the agency running
   the experiment or the private network.  The statement above describes
   how standards compliant implementations will treat the unrecognized
   TLVs and sub- TLVs from these ranges.

3.2.  Common Registration Procedures for TLVs and sub-TLVs

   This section describes the new registration procedures for the TLV
   and sub-TLV registries.

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
   | Range       | Registration      | Note                            |
   |             | Procedures        |                                 |
   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
   | 0-16383     | Standards Action  | This range is for TLVs and sub- |
   |             |                   | TLVs that require an error      |
   |             |                   | message if not recognized.      |
   | 16384-31739 | RFC Required      | This range is for TLVs an sub-  |
   |             |                   | TLVs that require an error      |
   |             |                   | message if not recognized.      |
   | 37140-37143 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
   | 31744-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for TLVs anf sub- |
   |             |                   | TLVs that require an error      |
   |             |                   | message if not recognized.      |
   | 32768-49161 | Standards Action  | This range is for TLVs and sub- |
   |             |                   | TLVs that can be silently       |
   |             |                   | dropped if not recognized.      |
   | 49162-64507 | RFC Required      | This range is for TLVs and sub- |
   |             |                   | TLVs that can be silently       |
   |             |                   | dropped if not recognized.      |
   | 64508-64511 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
   | 64512-65535 | FCFS              | This range is for TLVs and sub- |
   |             |                   | TLVs that can be silently       |
   |             |                   | dropped if not recognized.      |
   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+

                  TLV and sub-TLV Registration Procedures

[MC] Should 37140-37143 | Experimental Use actually be
31740-31743 | Experimental Use?

3.3.  Changes to the LSP Ping Registries

   This section lists the changes to each MPLS LSP Ping TLV and sub-TLV
   Registry, see section 6.2.1 to 6.2.7 describe how the new versions of
   the IANA registries should look, together with the registration
   procedures for each registry.

   The new Registration Procedures description and the new assignments
   for these registries are used to model the changed MPLS LSP Ping
   registries, see Section 6 .

3.3.1.  Common Changes to the TLV and Sub-TLV Registries

   The following changes are made to the TLV and sub-TLV registries.

   o  The registration procedures "First Come Frst Served (FCFS)" and
      "Experimental Use" are added to the table of registration
      procedures.

[MC] Typos “First”

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

   o  Two small sets of code points (4 code points each) for
      Experiemental Use, are created.  The first set are for the range
      that requires a response if the TLV or sub-TLV is not recognised;
      the second set are for the range there the TLV or sub-TLV that may
      be silently dropped if not recognized.  The code points for
      experimental use are actually taken from the two ranges now called
      "RFC Required".

[MC] Typo “Experimental”

   o  The registration procedure "Specification Required" is changed to
      "RFC Required" and the note "Experimental RFC needed" is removed.

   o  In the listing of assignments the term "Vendor Private Use" is
      changed to "First Come First Served (FCFS)".

   o  In the listing of assignments the range for "Experimental Use" is
      added.

   o  A note saying "Not to be assigned" is added for the registration
      procedures "Experimental Use".

   o  In the list that captures assignment status, the fields that are
      reserved, i.e.  0 (zero) and Experimental Use are clearly marked.

4.  Updates to Related RFCs

   Some referenced RFCs use the concept "mandatory TLVs" and "mandatory
   sub-TLVs" to indicate that, if a TLV or sub-TLV of the range 0-16383
   or 16384-31743 in a message is not understood, an error message needs
   to be sent in response.

   The same RFCs use "optional TLVs" and "optional sub-TLVs" to mean
   TLVs or sub-TLVs that can be silently ignored if not recognized.

   Since other RFCs use "mandatory TLVs" and "mandatory sub-TLVs" to
   indicate TLVs and sub-TLVs that must be present in a message, we want
   to discontinue the use of "mandatory" to indicate TLVs and sub-TLVs
   that requires an error message in response if not understood.  The
   changes to the RFCs below align with this practice.

4.1.  Updates to RFC 8029

   Mandatory and optional are used to indicate whether a response is
   needed if a TLV or sub-TLV is not understood on pages 14 and 15 in
   Section 3 of RFC 8029.

   The text in those two paragraphs are now updated to the following:

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

      TLV and sub-TLV Types less than 32768 (i.e., with the high-order
      bit equal to 0) are TLVs and sub-TLVs that MUST either be
      supported by an implementation or result in the Return Code of 2
      ("One or more of the TLVs was not understood") being sent in the
      echo response.

      An implementation that does not understand or support a received
      TLV or sub-TLV with Type greater than or equal to 32768 (i.e.,
      with the high-order bit equal to 1) SHOULD ignore and step over
      the TLV or sub-TLV, however an implementation MAY send an echo
      response with Return Code 2 ("One or more of the TLVs was not
      understood") as it would have done if the high order bit had been
      clear.

   In Section 3.8 of RFC 8029 "mandatory" is used in the same way.  The
   first two paragraphs of this section are now updated to read as
   follows:

      The following TLV is a TLV that MAY be included in an echo reply
      to inform the sender of an echo request that includes TLVs or sub-
      TLVs Types less than 32768 (i.e., with the high-order bit equal to
      0) are either not supported by the implementation or parsed and
      found to be in error.

      The Value field contains the TLVs, including sub-TLVs, that were
      not understood, encoded as sub-TLVs.

4.2.  Updates to RFC 8611

   Section 13.4.1 of "Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping and Traceroute
   Multipath Support for Link Aggregation Group (LAG) Interfaces
   [RFC8611]" defines "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 6" [IANA-Sub-6].

   The "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 6" registry is now updated to align with
   changes defined in this document.

   Section 13.4.1 of RFC 8611 is now updated as follows:

   Section 13.4.1 Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 6

   IANA has created a new sub-registry "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 6"
   [IANA-Sub-6] under the "TLVs" registry [IANA-TLV-reg] of the
   "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs)
   Ping Parameters" name space [lsp-ping-NameSpace].

   The "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 6" sub-registry is now updated to align
   with changes defined in this document.

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
   | Range       | Registration      | Note                            |
   |             | Procedures        |                                 |
   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
   | 0-16383     | Standards Action  | This range is for sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 16384-31739 | RFC Required      | This range is for sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 31740-31743 | Experimental Use  | Reserved not to be assigned     |
   | 31744-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 32768-49161 | Standards Action  | This range is for sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 49162-64507 | RFC Required      | This range is for sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 64508-64511 | Experimental Use  | Reserved not to be assigned     |
   | 64512-65535 | FCFS              | This range is for sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+

         Table 1: Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 6 Registration Procedures

5.  Security Considerations

   This document updates IANA registries.  It also updates terminology
   used to define, and clarifies the terminology related to, the code
   points in the registries.  The document does not change how the code-
   points in the registries are used.  This should not create any new
   threats.

   However, the updated terminology and the clarifications improve
   security because it makes it more likely that implementations will be
   consistent and harder to attack.

6.  IANA Considerations

   IANA is requested to update the "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)
   Label Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters" name space
   [IANA-LSP-PING] as described in this document.

   See Section 1.2 "Terminology Used in this Document" to see how "name
   space", "registry" and "sub-registry" are used in this document.

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 10]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

   In other parts of this document the communality of the changes to the
   LSP Ping registries has been the focus.  For the IANA considerations
   each changed registry has been described in its own right.

   The following registries and sub-registries are changed:

   "Message Types", [IANA-MT],
   "Reply Modes", [IANA-RM]
   "Return Codes" [IANA-RC]
   "TLVs" [IANA-TLV-reg]
   "Sub-TLVs for TLV Types 1, 16, and 21" [IANA-Sub-1-16-21]
   "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 6" [IANA-Sub-6]
   "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 11" [IANA-Sub-11]
   "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 20" [IANA-Sub-20]
   "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 23" [IANA-Sub-23]
   "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 27" [IANA-Sub-27]

6.1.  Updates to the Message Type, Reply Mode and Return Codes
      Registries

   This section details the updated registration procedures and
   allocations for "Message Type", "Reply Mode" and "Return Codes"
   registries.

6.1.1.  Updates to the Mesage Type registry

[MC] Typo “Message”

   This is the changes to the "Message Type" registry specified in this
   document:

   o  Code Point 0 (zero) is marked Resereved.

[MC] Typo “Reserved”

   o  The registration procedure "Specification Required" is changed to
      "RFC Required" and the comment "Experimental RFC needed" is
      removed.

   o  Four code point has been taken from what was earlier
      "Specification Required" to form a set of code points for
      "Experimental Use."

   The registration procedures after the changes for the "Message Type"
   registry are shown in the table below:

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 11]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

   +---------+--------------------+------------------------------------+
   | Range   | Registration       | Note                               |
   |         | Procedures         |                                    |
   +---------+--------------------+------------------------------------+
   | 0-191   | Standards Action   |                                    |
   | 192-247 | RFC Required       |                                    |
   | 248-251 | Experimental Use   | Reserved, not to be assigned       |
   | 252-255 | Private Use        | Reserved, not to be assigned       |
   +---------+--------------------+------------------------------------+

               Table 2: Message Type registration procedures

   The updated assignments for the "Message Types" registry will look
   like this:

   +---------+---------------------------------+-----------------------+
   | Value   | Meaning                         | Reference             |
   +---------+---------------------------------+-----------------------+
   | 0       | Reserved                        | This document         |
   | 1       | MPLS Echo Request               | [RFC8029]             |
   | 2       | MPLS Echo Reply                 | [RFC8029]             |
   | 3       | MPLS Proxy Ping Request         | [RFC7555]             |
   | 4       | MPLS Proxy Ping Reply           | [RFC7555]             |
   | 5       | MPLS Relayed Echo Reply         | [RFC7743]             |
   | 6-247   | Unassigned                      |                       |
   | 248-251 | Reserved for Experimental Use   | This document         |
   | 252-255 | Reserved for Private Use        | [RFC8029]             |
   +---------+---------------------------------+-----------------------+

            Table 3: Assignments for the Message Types registry

6.1.2.  Updates to the Reply Modes registry

   This is the changes to the "Reply Modes" registry specified in this
   document:

   o  Code Point 0 (zero) is marked Resereved.

[MC] Typo “Reserved”

   o  The registration procedure "Specification Required" is changed to
      "RFC Required" and the comment "Experimental RFC needed" is
      removed.

   o  Four code point has been taken from what was earlier
      "Specification Required" to form a set of code points for
      "Experimental Use".

   The registration procedures after the changes for the "Reply Modes"
   registry are show in the table below:

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 12]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

   +---------+--------------------+------------------------------------+
   | Range   | Registration       | Note                               |
   |         | Procedures         |                                    |
   +---------+--------------------+------------------------------------+
   | 0-191   | Standards Action   |                                    |
   | 192-247 | RFC Required       |                                    |
   | 248-251 | Experimental Use   | Reserved, not to be assigned       |
   | 252-255 | Private Use        | Reserved, not to be assigned       |
   +---------+--------------------+------------------------------------+

               Table 4: Reply Modes registration procedures

   The updated assignments for the "Reply Modes" registry will look like
   this:

   +---------+---------------------------------+-----------------------+
   | Value   | Meaning                         | Reference             |
   +---------+---------------------------------+-----------------------+
   | 0       | Reserved                        | This document         |
   | 1       | Do not reply                    | [RFC8029]             |
   | 2       | Reply via an IPv4/IPv6 UDP      | [RFC8029]             |
   |         | packet                          |                       |
   | 3       | Reply via an IPv4/IPv6 UDP      | [RFC8029]             |
   |         | packet with Router Alert        |                       |
   | 4       | Reply via application-level     | [RFC8029]             |
   |         | control channel                 |                       |
   | 5       | Reply via Specified Path        | [RFC7110]             |
   | 6-247   | Unassigned                      |                       |
   | 248-251 | Reserved for Experimental Use   | This document         |
   | 252-255 | Reserved for Private Use        | [RFC8029]             |
   +---------+---------------------------------+-----------------------+

             Table 5: Assignments for the Reply Modes registry

6.1.3.  Updates to the Return Codes registry

   This is the changes to the "Return Codes" registry specified in this
   document:

   o  The registration procedure "Specification Required" is changed to
      "RFC Required" and the comment "Experimental RFC needed" is
      removed.

   o  Four code point has been taken from what was earlier
      "Specification Required" to form a set of code points for
      "Experimental Use".

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 13]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

   The registration procedures after the changes for the "Return Codes"
   registry are show in the table below:

   +---------+--------------------+------------------------------------+
   | Range   | Registration       | Note                               |
   |         | Procedures         |                                    |
   +---------+--------------------+------------------------------------+
   | 0-191   | Standards Action   |                                    |
   | 192-247 | RFC Required       |                                    |
   | 248-251 | Experimental Use   | Reserved, not to be assigned       |
   | 252-255 | Private Use        | Reserved, not to be assigned       |
   +---------+--------------------+------------------------------------+

               Table 6: Return Codes registration procedures

   The updated assignments for the "Return Codes" registry will look
   like this:

   +---------+----------------------------------+----------------------+
   | Value   | Meaning                          | Reference            |
   +---------+----------------------------------+----------------------+
   | 0       | No Return Code                   | This document        |
   | 1       | Malformed echo request received  | [RFC8029]            |
   | 2       | One or more of the TLVs was not  | [RFC8029]            |
   |         | understood                       |                      |
   | 3       | Replying router is an egress for | [RFC8029]            |
   |         | the FEC at stack-depth (RSC)     |                      |
   | 4       | Replying router has no mapping   | [RFC8029]            |
   |         | for the FEC at stack-depth (RSC) |                      |
   | 5       | Downstream Mapping Mismatch (See | [RFC8029]            |
   |         | [1])                             |                      |
   | 6       | Upstream Interface Index Unknown | [RFC8029]            |
   |         | (See [1])                        |                      |
   | 7       | Reserved                         | [RFC8029]            |
   | 8       | Label switched at stack-depth    | [RFC8029]            |
   |         | (RSC)                            |                      |
   | 9       | Label switched but no MPLS       | [RFC8029]            |
   |         | forwarding at stack-depth (RSC)  |                      |
   | 10      | Mapping for this FEC is not the  | [RFC8029]            |
   |         | given label at stack-depth (RSC) |                      |
   | 11      | No label entry at stack-depth    | [RFC8029]            |
   |         | (RSC)                            |                      |
   | 12      | Protocol not associated with     | [RFC8029]            |
   |         | interface at FEC stack-depth     |                      |
   |         | (RSC)                            |                      |
   | 13      | Premature termination of ping    | [RFC8029]            |
   |         | due to label stack shrinking to  |                      |
   |         | a single label                   |                      |

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 14]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

   | 14      | See DDMAP TLV for meaning of     | [RFC8029]            |
   |         | Return Code and Return Subcode   |                      |
   |         | (See [2])                        |                      |
   | 15      | Label switched with FEC change   | [RFC8029]            |
   | 16      | Proxy Ping not authorized        | [RFC7555]            |
   | 17      | Proxy Ping parameters need to be | [RFC7555]            |
   |         | modified                         |                      |
   | 18      | MPLS Echo Request could not be   | [RFC7555]            |
   |         | sent                             |                      |
   | 19      | Replying router has FEC mapping  | [RFC7555]            |
   |         | for topmost FEC                  |                      |
   | 20      | One or more TLVs not returned    | [RFC7743]            |
   |         | due to MTU size                  |                      |
   | 21      | OAM Problem/Unsupported BFD      | [RFC7759]            |
   |         | Version                          |                      |
   | 22      | OAM Problem/Unsupported BFD      | [RFC7759]            |
   |         | Encapsulation format             |                      |
   | 23      | OAM Problem/Unsupported BFD      | [RFC7759]            |
   |         | Authentication Type              |                      |
   | 24      | OAM Problem/Mismatch of BFD      | [RFC7759]            |
   |         | Authentication Key ID            |                      |
   | 25      | OAM Problem/Unsupported          | [RFC7759]            |
   |         | Timestamp Format                 |                      |
   | 26      | OAM Problem/Unsupported Delay    | [RFC7759]            |
   |         | Mode                             |                      |
   | 27      | OAM Problem/Unsupported Loss     | [RFC7759]            |
   |         | Mode                             |                      |
   | 28      | AM Problem/Delay variation       | [RFC7759]            |
   |         | unsupported                      |                      |
   | 29      | OAM Problem/Dyadic mode          | [RFC7759]            |
   |         | unsupported                      |                      |
   | 30      | OAM Problem/Loopback mode        | [RFC7759]            |
   |         | unsupported                      |                      |
   | 31      | OAM Problem/Combined mode        | [RFC7759]            |
   |         | unsupported                      |                      |
   | 32      | OAM Problem/Fault management     | [RFC7759]            |
   |         | signaling unsupported            |                      |
   | 33      | OAM Problem/Unable to create     | [RFC7759]            |
   |         | fault management association     |                      |
   | 34      | OAM Problem/PM Configuration     | [RFC7759]            |
   |         | Error                            |                      |
   | 35      | Mapping for this FEC is not      | [RFC8287] sec 7.4    |
   |         | associated with the incoming     |                      |
   |         | interface                        |                      |
   | 36-247  | Unassigned                       | [RFC7759]            |
   | 248-251 | Reserved for Experimental Use    | This document        |
   | 252-255 | Reserved for Private Use         | [RFC8029]            |
   +---------+----------------------------------+----------------------+

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 15]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

            Table 7: Assignments for the Return Codes registry

6.2.  Updates to the TLV and sub-TLV registries

   The updates to the TLV and the sub-TLV registries are mostly the
   same, however the Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 9 [IANA-Sub-9] has not been
   updated.

   Note that when a field in an assigment table sayds "EQ", it means
   that the field should not be changed as compared to the corresponding
   field in the "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched
   Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters" name space [IANA-LSP-PING]

[MC] Typos “assignment”, “says”

6.2.1.  Updates to the TLVs registry

   This section describes the new registration procedures and the
   assignments for the "TLVs" registry [IANA-TLV-reg] based on the new
   registration procedures.

   The registration procedures has been changed the following way for
   the "TLVs" registry.

   o  The "Specification Required" registration procedure has been
      changed to "RFC Required", the comment "Experimental RFC Required"
      has been removed.

   o  The code points registration procedure "Vendor Private Use" has
      been removed and replaced with "First Come, First Served" code
      points.

   o  Two small sets, 4 code points each, has been created for
      Experimental Use.

   o  Code points that are reserved are clearly marked as such.

   o  The assignments have been updated to match the new registration
      procedures.

   o  The notes related to the registration procedures have been changed
      to reflect when a response is required or not if a TLV is not
      recognized.

   The registration procedures for the "TLVs" registry [IANA-TLV-reg]
   will now look like this:

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 16]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
   | Range       | Registration      | Note                            |
   |             | Procedures        |                                 |
   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
   | 0-16383     | Standards Action  | This range is for TLVs that     |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 16384-31739 | RFC Required      | This range is for TLVs that     |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 31740-31743 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
   | 31744-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for TLVs that     |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 32768-49161 | Standards Action  | This range is for TLVs that can |
   |             |                   | be silently dropped if not      |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 49162-64507 | RFC Required      | This range is for TLVs that can |
   |             |                   | be silently dropped if not      |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 64508-64511 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
   | 64512-65535 | FCFS              | This range is for TLVs that can |
   |             |                   | be silently dropped if not      |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+

                   Table 8: TLV Registration Procedures

   The TLV Assignments will now look like this.

   Note that when a field in this table does say "EQ", it means that if
   should be the same as the registry being updtated.

[MC] Typo “updated”

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 17]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

   +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
   | Type        | TLV Name      | Reference       | Sub-TLV Registry  |
   +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
   | 0           | Reserved      | This document   |                   |
   | 1-7         | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
   | 8           | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   | 9-16        | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
   | 17-19       | unassigned    |                 |                   |
   | 20-27       | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
   | 28-31739    | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   | 31740-31743 | Experimental  | This Document   | Reserved, not to  |
   |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
   | 31744-32767 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   | 32768-32770 | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
   | 32771-64507 | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
   | 64508-64511 | Experimental  | This document   | Resereved, not to |
   |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
   | 64512-65535 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+

[MC] Typo “Reserved”

                         Table 9: TLV Assignments

6.2.2.  Updates to the registry for SubTLVs for TLVs 1, 16 and 21

   This section describes the new registration procedures and the
   assignments for the "Sub-TLVs for TLV Types 1, 16, and 21"
   [IANA-Sub-1-16-21] sub-registry based on the new registration
   procedures.

   o  The "Specification Required" registration procedure has been
      changed to "RFC Required", the comment "Experimental RFC Required"
      has been removed.

   o  The code points registration procedure "Vendor Private Use" has
      been removed and replaced with "First Come, First Served" code
      points.

   o  Two small sets, 4 code points each, has been created for
      Experimental Use.

   o  Code points that are reserved are clearly marked as such.

   o  The assignments have been updated to match the new registration
      procedures.

   o  The notes related to the registration procedures have been changed
      to reflect when a response is required if a sub-TLV is not
      recognized or not.

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 18]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

   The registration procedures for the
   "Sub-TLVs for TLV Types 1, 16, and 21" [IANA-Sub-1-16-21] sub-
   registry will now look like this:

   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
   | Range       | Registration      | Note                            |
   |             | Procedures        |                                 |
   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
   | 0-16383     | Standards Action  | This range is for TLVs that     |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 16384-31739 | RFC Required      | This range is for TLVs that     |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 37140-37144 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
   | 31748-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for TLVs that     |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 32768-49161 | Standards Action  | This range is for TLVs that can |
   |             |                   | be silently dropped if not      |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 49162-64507 | RFC Required      | This range is for TLVs that can |
   |             |                   | be silently dropped if not      |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 64508-64511 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
   | 64512-65535 | FCFS              | This range is for TLVs that can |
   |             |                   | be silently dropped if not      |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+

   Table 10: Registration Procedures for Sub-TLVs for TLVs 1, 16 and 21

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 19]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

   +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
   | Type        | TLV Name      | Reference       | Comment           |
   +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
   | 0           | Reserved      | This document   |                   |
   | 1-4         | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
   | 5           | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   | 6-8         | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
   | 9           | EQ            | EQ              | DEPRECATED        |
   | 9-20        | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
   | 21          | unassigned    |                 |                   |
   | 22-37       | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
   | 38-31739    | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   | 31740-31743 | Experimental  | This Document   | Reserved, not to  |
   |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
   | 31744-64507 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   | 64508-64511 | Experimental  | This document   | Resereved, not to |
   |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
   | 64512-65535 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+

[MC] Typo “Reserved”

            Table 11: Sub-TLV for TLV 1, 16 and 21 Assignments

6.2.3.  Updates to the registry for SubTLVs for TLV 6

   This section describes the new registration procedures and the
   assignments for the "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 6" [IANA-Sub-6] sub-
   registry based on the new registration procedures.

   o  The "Specification Required" registration procedure has been
      changed to "RFC Required", the comment "Experimental RFC Required"
      has been removed.

   o  The code points registration procedure "Vendor Private Use" has
      been removed and replaced with "First Come, First Served" code
      points.

   o  Two small sets, 4 code points each, has been created for
      Experimental Use.

   o  Code points that are reserved are clearly marked as such.

   o  The assignments have been updated to match the new registration
      procedures.

   o  The notes related to the registration procedures have been changed
      to reflect when a response is required if a sub-TLV is not
      recognized or not.

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 20]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

   The registration procedures for the "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 6"
   [IANA-Sub-6] sub-registry will now look like this:

   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
   | Range       | Registration      | Note                            |
   |             | Procedures        |                                 |
   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
   | 0-16383     | Standards Action  | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 16384-31739 | RFC Required      | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 37140-37144 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
   | 31748-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 32768-49161 | Standards Action  | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 49162-64507 | RFC Required      | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 64508-64511 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
   | 64512-65535 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+

         Table 12: Registration Procedures for Sub-TLVs for TLVs 6

   +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
   | Type        | TLV Name      | Reference       | Comment           |
   +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
   | 0           | Reserved      | This document   |                   |
   | 1-2         | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
   | 3-31739     | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   | 31740-31743 | Experimental  | This Document   | Reserved, not to  |
   |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
   | 31744-64507 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   | 64508-64511 | Experimental  | This document   | Resereved, not to |
   |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
   | 64512-65535 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+

[MC] Typo “Reserved”

                 Table 13: Sub-TLVs for TLV 6 Assignments

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 21]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

6.2.4.  Updates to the registry for SubTLVs for TLV 11

   This section describes the new registration procedures and the
   assignments for the "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 11" [IANA-Sub-11] sub-
   registry based on the new registration procedures.

   o  The "Specification Required" registration procedure has been
      changed to "RFC Required", the comment "Experimental RFC Required"
      has been removed.

   o  The code points registration procedure "Vendor Private Use" has
      been removed and replaced with "First Come, First Served" code
      points.

   o  Two small sets, 4 code points each, has been created for
      Experimental Use.

   o  Code points that are reserved are clearly marked as such.

   o  The assignments have been updated to match the new registration
      procedures.

   o  The notes related to the registration procedures have been changed
      to reflect when a response is required if a sub-TLV is not
      recognized or not.

   The registration procedures for the "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 11"
   [IANA-Sub-11] sub-registry will now look like this:

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 22]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
   | Range       | Registration      | Note                            |
   |             | Procedures        |                                 |
   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
   | 0-16383     | Standards Action  | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 16384-31739 | RFC Required      | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 37140-37144 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
   | 31748-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 32768-49161 | Standards Action  | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 49162-64507 | RFC Required      | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 64508-64511 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
   | 64512-65535 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+

        Table 14: Registration Procedures for Sub-TLVs for TLVs 11

   +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
   | Type        | TLV Name      | Reference       | Comment           |
   +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
   | 0           | Reserved      | This document   |                   |
   | 1-4         | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
   | 5-31739     | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   | 31740-31743 | Experimental  | This Document   | Reserved, not to  |
   |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
   | 31744-64507 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   | 64508-64511 | Experimental  | This document   | Resereved, not to |
   |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
   | 64512-65535 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+

[MC] Typo “Reserved”

                 Table 15: Sub-TLVs for TLV 11 Assignments

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 23]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

6.2.5.  Updates to the registry for SubTLVs for TLV 20

   This section describes the new registration procedures and the
   assignments for the "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 20" [IANA-Sub-20] sub-
   registry based on the new registration procedures.

   o  The "Specification Required" registration procedure has been
      changed to "RFC Required", the comment "Experimental RFC Required"
      has been removed.

   o  The code points registration procedure "Vendor Private Use" has
      been removed and replaced with "First Come, First Served" code
      points.

   o  Two small sets, 4 code points each, has been created for
      Experimental Use.

   o  Code points that are reserved are clearly marked as such.

   o  The assignments have been updated to match the new registration
      procedures.

   o  The notes related to the registration procedures have been changed
      to reflect when a response is required if a sub-TLV is not
      recognized or not.

   The registration procedures for the "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 20"
   [IANA-Sub-20] sub-registry will now look like this:

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 24]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
   | Range       | Registration      | Note                            |
   |             | Procedures        |                                 |
   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
   | 0-16383     | Standards Action  | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 16384-31739 | RFC Required      | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 37140-37144 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
   | 31748-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 32768-49161 | Standards Action  | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 49162-64507 | RFC Required      | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 64508-64511 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
   | 64512-65535 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+

        Table 16: Registration Procedures for Sub-TLVs for TLVs 20

   +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
   | Type        | TLV Name      | Reference       | Comment           |
   +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
   | 0           | Reserved      | This document   |                   |
   | 1-5         | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
   | 6-31739     | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   | 31740-31743 | Experimental  | This Document   | Reserved, not to  |
   |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
   | 31744-64507 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   | 64508-64511 | Experimental  | This document   | Resereved, not to |
   |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
   | 64512-65535 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+

[MC] Typo “Reserved”

                 Table 17: Sub-TLVs for TLV 20 Assignments

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 25]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

6.2.6.  Updates to the registry for SubTLVs for TLV 23

   This section describes the new registration procedures and the
   assignments for the "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 23" [IANA-Sub-23] sub-
   registry based on the new registration procedures.

   o  The "Specification Required" registration procedure has been
      changed to "RFC Required", the comment "Experimental RFC Required"
      has been removed.

   o  The code points registration procedure "Vendor Private Use" has
      been removed and replaced with "First Come, First Served" code
      points.

   o  Two small sets, 4 code points each, has been created for
      Experimental Use.

   o  Code points that are reserved are clearly marked as such.

   o  The assignments have been updated to match the new registration
      procedures.

   o  The notes related to the registration procedures have been changed
      to reflect when a response is required if a sub-TLV is not
      recognized or not.

   The registration procedures for the "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 23"
   [IANA-Sub-23] sub-registry will now look like this:

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 26]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
   | Range       | Registration      | Note                            |
   |             | Procedures        |                                 |
   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
   | 0-16383     | Standards Action  | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 16384-31739 | RFC Required      | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 37140-37144 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
   | 31748-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 32768-49161 | Standards Action  | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 49162-64507 | RFC Required      | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 64508-64511 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
   | 64512-65535 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+

        Table 18: Registration Procedures for Sub-TLVs for TLVs 23

   +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
   | Type        | TLV Name      | Reference       | Comment           |
   +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
   | 0           | Reserved      | [RFC7555]       |                   |
   | 1           | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
   | 2-31739     | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   | 31740-31743 | Experimental  | This Document   | Reserved, not to  |
   |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
   | 31744-64507 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   | 64508-64511 | Experimental  | This document   | Resereved, not to |
   |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
   | 64512-65535 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+

[MC] Typo “Reserved”

                 Table 19: Sub-TLVs for TLV 23 Assignments

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 27]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

6.2.7.  Updates to the registry for SubTLVs for TLV 27

   This section describes the new registration procedures and the
   assignments for the "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 27" [IANA-Sub-27] sub-
   registry based on the new registration procedures.

   o  The "Specification Required" registration procedure has been
      changed to "RFC Required", the comment "Experimental RFC Required"
      has been removed.

   o  The code points registration procedure "Vendor Private Use" has
      been removed and replaced with "First Come, First Served" code
      points.

   o  Two small sets, 4 code points each, has been created for
      Experimental Use.

   o  Code points that are reserved are clearly marked as such.

   o  The assignments have been updated to match the new registration
      procedures.

   o  The notes related to the registration procedures have been changed
      to reflect when a response is required if a sub-TLV is not
      recognized or not.

   The registration procedures for the "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 27"
   [IANA-Sub-27] sub-registry will now look like this:

Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 28]
Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020

   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
   | Range       | Registration      | Note                            |
   |             | Procedures        |                                 |
   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
   | 0-16383     | Standards Action  | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 16384-31739 | RFC Required      | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 37140-37144 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
   | 31748-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | require an error message if not |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 32768-49161 | Standards Action  | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 49162-64507 | RFC Required      | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   | 64508-64511 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
   | 64512-65535 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
   |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
   |             |                   | recognized.                     |
   +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+

         Table 20: Registration Procedures for Sub-TLVs for TLV 27

   +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
   | Type        | TLV Name      | Reference       | Comment           |
   +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
   | 0           | Reserved      | [RFC7555]       |                   |
   | 1           | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
   | 2-31739     | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   | 31740-31743 | Experimental  | This Document   | Reserved, not to  |
   |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
   | 31744-64507 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   | 64508-64511 | Experimental  | This document   | Resereved, not to |
   |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
   | 64512-65535 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
   +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+

                 Table 21: Sub-TLVs for TLV 27 Assignments


From nobody Fri Oct 23 03:37:11 2020
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2783A0B91 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 03:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.143
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.143 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EhQHjVuqnZ8U for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 03:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0624A3A0C38 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 03:37:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (unknown [124.104.122.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7094031D22B; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:36:59 +0200 (CEST)
To: iana-issues-comment@iana.org
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
References: <RT-Ticket-1180946@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-21295-1603389173-719.1180946-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-13899-1603389992-1633.1180946-9-0@icann.org>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <d2f2b1fa-88b3-da70-f07c-82c985643921@pi.nu>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:36:56 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-13899-1603389992-1633.1180946-9-0@icann.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/6dhGLqQc3wayl7DMhfAXxFgKAf0>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [IANA #1180946] Early Review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 10:37:10 -0000

Michelle,

Thanks for careful review! Please see responses inline. Many of the 
typos were already found by Tom and Marti, but you found new ones.

I will now post version -05 of the document, which be ready for

I'm still a bit uncertain on how to name the "levels" in the MPLS IANA 
structure. I'm preparing a new draft for this, which even it does not go 
anywhere at least serve to explain to me what a correct terminology is.


On 23/10/2020 02:06, Michelle Cotton via RT wrote:
> Loa,
> 
> I've taken a look at version 04 of this document.
> Below you will find my comments with [MC]. I've pointed out some typos too.
> 
> Overall, the document seems to provide clear instructions on what IANA needs to change in the registries (both in registration procedures and specific changes to the registrations).
> 
> We'll do an official review when it goes through IETF Last Call.
> Let us know if you have any further questions.
> 
> Thanks,
> Michelle
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 1.  Introduction
> 
>     When RFC 8029 [RFC8029] was published it contained updates to the
>     "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs)
>     Ping Parameters" IANA name space [IANA-LSP-PING].
> 
>     RFC 8611 [RFC8611] updated the LSP Ping IANA registries to match RFC
>     8029.  This document further clarifies the entries in those
>     registries and makes the definitions more precise.
> 
>     This document updates RFC 8029 [[RFC8029] and RFC 8611 [RFC8611] by
>     updating two groups of registries as follows:
> 
> [MC] Question: Will we be replacing the RFC8029 and RFC8611 references with this document or adding this document as an additional reference?

Godd question, I've gone back and forth on it. Juat now I think we need 
to reference both documents, since we are not updating the entire 8029 
and 8611.

> 
>     First the registries for Message Types [IANA-MT], Reply Modes
>     [IANA-RM] and Return Codes [IANA-RC] are updated.  The changes to
>     these registries are minor.
> 
>     Second, this document updates the TLV and sub-TLV registries.
> 
>     o  TLVs [IANA-TLV-reg].
> 
>     o  Sub-TLVs for TLVs 1, 16 and 21 [IANA-Sub-1-16-21].
> 
>     o  Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 6 [IANA-Sub-6].
> 
>     o  Sub-TLVs for TLV 11 [IANA-Sub-11].
> 
>     o  Sub-TLVs for TLV 20 [IANA-Sub-20].
> 
>     o  Sub-TLVs for TLV 23 [IANA-Sub-23].
> 
>     o  Sub-TLVs for TLV 27 [IANA-Sub-27].
> 
>     The registry for sub-TLVs for TLV 9 [IANA-Sub-9] is not updated.
> 
>     Third, some code points (TLVs and sub-TLVs) are "mandatory" or
>     "optional".  Contrary to how other RFCs use these words, indicating
>     that it is mandatory or optional to include the code points in a
>     message, RFC 8029 uses these words to indicate that an action might
>     or might not be necessary.  This document updates RFC 8029 to drop
>     the words "mandatory" and "optional", and the text is changed to
>     focus on what should be done.
> 
> 1.2.  Terminology Used in this Document
> 
>     This docuemtment uses some terms that relates to IANA registries in
>     this way:
> 
> [MC] Typo “document”
        Fixed in a previous update
> 
>        IANA Name Space,
>        a name space is a top level registry.  An exasmple could be
>        "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs)
>        Ping Parameters" [IANA-LSP-PING].  A name space is most often a
>        contaimer for regiistries that hold code points that share some
>        affinity.
> 
> [MC] Typo “example”, “container”, “registries”
         Fixed

> 
>        IANA Registry,
>        an IANA registry holds code points, and lists the registration
>        procedures and allocation of code points these code points.  One
>        example would be the "TLVs" registry [IANA-TLV-reg].
> 
>        IANA Sub-registry,
>        a sub-registry is used when a code point allocated in a registry
>        need code points scoped by that or a set of code points.  An
>        example of a sunregistry thast holds code points for more than one
>        TLV is "Sub-TLVs for TLV Types 1, 16, and 21" [IANA-Sub-1-16-21]
> 
> [MC] Typo “Sub registry”, “that”
        A comment from Martin change the text in this paragraph.
        Question: I like to use Sub-registry in "titles", like the "IANA
        Sub-registry". And sub-registry within text. Would that be OK?


> 
> 2.  Updating the Message Types, Reply Mode and Return Codes Registries
> 
>     The following changes are made to the Message Types, Reply Modes and
>     Return Codes [IANA-MT] registries.
> 
>     o  In the listing of assiged code points the term "Vendor Private
>        Use" is changed to "Private Use".
> 
> [MC] Typo “Assigned”
        Fixed, but I saw no reason to use capital "A".
> 
>     o  The registration procedure "Specification Required" is changed to
>        "RFC Required" and the note "Experimental RFC needed" is removed.
> 
>     o  A small set of code points (4 code points) for Experimental Use is
>        added by reducing the range for "RFC Required" range.
> 
>     o  The registration procedures "Private Use" and "Experimental Use"
>        are added to the table of registration procedures.
> 
>     o  A note "Not to be assigned" is added for the registration
>        procedures "Private Use" and "Experimental Use".
> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                 [Page 4]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
>     o  In the lists that capture the assignment status, the fields that
>        are reserved, i.e.  0 (zero), Private Use and Experimental Use are
>        clearly marked as such.
> 
>        *  Note that in the Return Codes registry [IANA-RC] registry the
>           code point "0" has already been assigned.  This assignment is
>           not changed and in this registry the code point "0" continues
>           to be assigned as "No Return Code".
> 
>     The new Registration Procedures, the registry layouts and the new
>     assignments for these registries are found in Section 6.1.
> 
> 3.  Updating the TLV and Sub-TLV Registries
> 
> 3.1.  General Principles for the LSP Ping TLV and Sub-TLV registries
> 
>     The following principles apply to the processing of any TLV from any
>     of the LSP Ping TLV and sub-TLV IANA registries.
> 
>     o  All TLVs and sub-TLVs with a type in the range 0-32767 require a
>        response if they are not recognized.
> 
>     o  All TLVs and sub-TLVs in the range 32768-65535 may be silently
>        dropped, stepped over or an error message sennt if they are not
>        recognized.
> 
> [MC] Typo “sent”
        Fixed earlier
> 
>     The range of each TLV and sub-TLV registry is divided into two
>     blocks, one with a range from 0 to 32767 for TLVs and sub-TLVs that
>     require a response if not recognized.  The other block has the range
>     from 32768 to 65535 for TLVs and sub-TLVs that may be silently
>     dropped, stepped over or an error message sent, if not recognized.
> 
>     Each of the blocks has code point spaces with the following
>     registration procedures:
> 
>     o  Standards Action.
> 
>     o  RFC Required.
> 
>     o  Experimental Use.
> 
>     o  First come, first served (FCFS).
> 
>     The exact defintions of these procedures are found in [RFC8126].
> 
> [MC] Typo “definitions”
   Fixed

> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                 [Page 5]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
> 3.1.1.  Unrecognized Experimental Use TLVs and Sub-TLVs
> 
>     Unrecognized TLVs and sub-TLVs in the Experimetal Use, and FCFS
>     ranges are handled as any other unrecognized TLV or sub-TLV.
>
> [MC] Typo “Experimental”
   Fixed

> 
>     o  If the unrecognized TLV or sub-TLV is from the Experimental Use
>        range (37140-37143) or from the FCFS range (31744-32767) a the
>        Return Code of 2 ("One or more of the TLVs was not understood")
>        will be sent in the echo response.
> 
>     o  If the unrecognized TLV or sub-TLV is from the Experimental Use
>        range (64508-64511).  or from the FCFS range (64512-65535) the
>        TLVs may be silently ignored, stepped over or an error message
>        sent.
> 
>     The IETF does not prescribe how recognized or unrecognized
>     Experimental Use and Private Use TLVs and sub-TLVs are handled in
>     experimental or private networks, that is up to the agency running
>     the experiment or the private network.  The statement above describes
>     how standards compliant implementations will treat the unrecognized
>     TLVs and sub- TLVs from these ranges.
> 
> 3.2.  Common Registration Procedures for TLVs and sub-TLVs
> 
>     This section describes the new registration procedures for the TLV
>     and sub-TLV registries.
> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                 [Page 6]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
>     | Range       | Registration      | Note                            |
>     |             | Procedures        |                                 |
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
>     | 0-16383     | Standards Action  | This range is for TLVs and sub- |
>     |             |                   | TLVs that require an error      |
>     |             |                   | message if not recognized.      |
>     | 16384-31739 | RFC Required      | This range is for TLVs an sub-  |
>     |             |                   | TLVs that require an error      |
>     |             |                   | message if not recognized.      |
>     | 37140-37143 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
>     | 31744-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for TLVs anf sub- |
>     |             |                   | TLVs that require an error      |
>     |             |                   | message if not recognized.      |
>     | 32768-49161 | Standards Action  | This range is for TLVs and sub- |
>     |             |                   | TLVs that can be silently       |
>     |             |                   | dropped if not recognized.      |
>     | 49162-64507 | RFC Required      | This range is for TLVs and sub- |
>     |             |                   | TLVs that can be silently       |
>     |             |                   | dropped if not recognized.      |
>     | 64508-64511 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
>     | 64512-65535 | FCFS              | This range is for TLVs and sub- |
>     |             |                   | TLVs that can be silently       |
>     |             |                   | dropped if not recognized.      |
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
> 
>                    TLV and sub-TLV Registration Procedures
> 
> [MC] Should 37140-37143 | Experimental Use actually be
> 31740-31743 | Experimental Use?
   The rangges were fixed based on comments from Tom and Martin, and be
   correct in version -05, which will be posted as soon as I addressed
   all of your comments.

> 
> 3.3.  Changes to the LSP Ping Registries
> 
>     This section lists the changes to each MPLS LSP Ping TLV and sub-TLV
>     Registry, see section 6.2.1 to 6.2.7 describe how the new versions of
>     the IANA registries should look, together with the registration
>     procedures for each registry.
> 
>     The new Registration Procedures description and the new assignments
>     for these registries are used to model the changed MPLS LSP Ping
>     registries, see Section 6 .
> 
> 3.3.1.  Common Changes to the TLV and Sub-TLV Registries
> 
>     The following changes are made to the TLV and sub-TLV registries.
> 
>     o  The registration procedures "First Come Frst Served (FCFS)" and
>        "Experimental Use" are added to the table of registration
>        procedures.
> 
> [MC] Typos “First”
   Fixed

> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                 [Page 7]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
>     o  Two small sets of code points (4 code points each) for
>        Experiemental Use, are created.  The first set are for the range
>        that requires a response if the TLV or sub-TLV is not recognised;
>        the second set are for the range there the TLV or sub-TLV that may
>        be silently dropped if not recognized.  The code points for
>        experimental use are actually taken from the two ranges now called
>        "RFC Required".
> 
> [MC] Typo “Experimental”
        Fixed

> 
>     o  The registration procedure "Specification Required" is changed to
>        "RFC Required" and the note "Experimental RFC needed" is removed.
> 
>     o  In the listing of assignments the term "Vendor Private Use" is
>        changed to "First Come First Served (FCFS)".
> 
>     o  In the listing of assignments the range for "Experimental Use" is
>        added.
> 
>     o  A note saying "Not to be assigned" is added for the registration
>        procedures "Experimental Use".
> 
>     o  In the list that captures assignment status, the fields that are
>        reserved, i.e.  0 (zero) and Experimental Use are clearly marked.
> 
> 4.  Updates to Related RFCs
> 
>     Some referenced RFCs use the concept "mandatory TLVs" and "mandatory
>     sub-TLVs" to indicate that, if a TLV or sub-TLV of the range 0-16383
>     or 16384-31743 in a message is not understood, an error message needs
>     to be sent in response.
> 
>     The same RFCs use "optional TLVs" and "optional sub-TLVs" to mean
>     TLVs or sub-TLVs that can be silently ignored if not recognized.
> 
>     Since other RFCs use "mandatory TLVs" and "mandatory sub-TLVs" to
>     indicate TLVs and sub-TLVs that must be present in a message, we want
>     to discontinue the use of "mandatory" to indicate TLVs and sub-TLVs
>     that requires an error message in response if not understood.  The
>     changes to the RFCs below align with this practice.
> 
> 4.1.  Updates to RFC 8029
> 
>     Mandatory and optional are used to indicate whether a response is
>     needed if a TLV or sub-TLV is not understood on pages 14 and 15 in
>     Section 3 of RFC 8029.
> 
>     The text in those two paragraphs are now updated to the following:
> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                 [Page 8]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
>        TLV and sub-TLV Types less than 32768 (i.e., with the high-order
>        bit equal to 0) are TLVs and sub-TLVs that MUST either be
>        supported by an implementation or result in the Return Code of 2
>        ("One or more of the TLVs was not understood") being sent in the
>        echo response.
> 
>        An implementation that does not understand or support a received
>        TLV or sub-TLV with Type greater than or equal to 32768 (i.e.,
>        with the high-order bit equal to 1) SHOULD ignore and step over
>        the TLV or sub-TLV, however an implementation MAY send an echo
>        response with Return Code 2 ("One or more of the TLVs was not
>        understood") as it would have done if the high order bit had been
>        clear.
> 
>     In Section 3.8 of RFC 8029 "mandatory" is used in the same way.  The
>     first two paragraphs of this section are now updated to read as
>     follows:
> 
>        The following TLV is a TLV that MAY be included in an echo reply
>        to inform the sender of an echo request that includes TLVs or sub-
>        TLVs Types less than 32768 (i.e., with the high-order bit equal to
>        0) are either not supported by the implementation or parsed and
>        found to be in error.
> 
>        The Value field contains the TLVs, including sub-TLVs, that were
>        not understood, encoded as sub-TLVs.
> 
> 4.2.  Updates to RFC 8611
> 
>     Section 13.4.1 of "Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping and Traceroute
>     Multipath Support for Link Aggregation Group (LAG) Interfaces
>     [RFC8611]" defines "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 6" [IANA-Sub-6].
> 
>     The "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 6" registry is now updated to align with
>     changes defined in this document.
> 
>     Section 13.4.1 of RFC 8611 is now updated as follows:
> 
>     Section 13.4.1 Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 6
> 
>     IANA has created a new sub-registry "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 6"
>     [IANA-Sub-6] under the "TLVs" registry [IANA-TLV-reg] of the
>     "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs)
>     Ping Parameters" name space [lsp-ping-NameSpace].
> 
>     The "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 6" sub-registry is now updated to align
>     with changes defined in this document.
> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                 [Page 9]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
>     | Range       | Registration      | Note                            |
>     |             | Procedures        |                                 |
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
>     | 0-16383     | Standards Action  | This range is for sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 16384-31739 | RFC Required      | This range is for sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 31740-31743 | Experimental Use  | Reserved not to be assigned     |
>     | 31744-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 32768-49161 | Standards Action  | This range is for sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 49162-64507 | RFC Required      | This range is for sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 64508-64511 | Experimental Use  | Reserved not to be assigned     |
>     | 64512-65535 | FCFS              | This range is for sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
> 
>           Table 1: Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 6 Registration Procedures
> 
> 5.  Security Considerations
> 
>     This document updates IANA registries.  It also updates terminology
>     used to define, and clarifies the terminology related to, the code
>     points in the registries.  The document does not change how the code-
>     points in the registries are used.  This should not create any new
>     threats.
> 
>     However, the updated terminology and the clarifications improve
>     security because it makes it more likely that implementations will be
>     consistent and harder to attack.
> 
> 6.  IANA Considerations
> 
>     IANA is requested to update the "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)
>     Label Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters" name space
>     [IANA-LSP-PING] as described in this document.
> 
>     See Section 1.2 "Terminology Used in this Document" to see how "name
>     space", "registry" and "sub-registry" are used in this document.
> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 10]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
>     In other parts of this document the communality of the changes to the
>     LSP Ping registries has been the focus.  For the IANA considerations
>     each changed registry has been described in its own right.
> 
>     The following registries and sub-registries are changed:
> 
>     "Message Types", [IANA-MT],
>     "Reply Modes", [IANA-RM]
>     "Return Codes" [IANA-RC]
>     "TLVs" [IANA-TLV-reg]
>     "Sub-TLVs for TLV Types 1, 16, and 21" [IANA-Sub-1-16-21]
>     "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 6" [IANA-Sub-6]
>     "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 11" [IANA-Sub-11]
>     "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 20" [IANA-Sub-20]
>     "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 23" [IANA-Sub-23]
>     "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 27" [IANA-Sub-27]
> 
> 6.1.  Updates to the Message Type, Reply Mode and Return Codes
>        Registries
> 
>     This section details the updated registration procedures and
>     allocations for "Message Type", "Reply Mode" and "Return Codes"
>     registries.
> 
> 6.1.1.  Updates to the Mesage Type registry
> 
> [MC] Typo “Message”
   Fixed

> 
>     This is the changes to the "Message Type" registry specified in this
>     document:
> 
>     o  Code Point 0 (zero) is marked Resereved.
> 
> [MC] Typo “Reserved”
   Fixed

> 
>     o  The registration procedure "Specification Required" is changed to
>        "RFC Required" and the comment "Experimental RFC needed" is
>        removed.
> 
>     o  Four code point has been taken from what was earlier
>        "Specification Required" to form a set of code points for
>        "Experimental Use."
> 
>     The registration procedures after the changes for the "Message Type"
>     registry are shown in the table below:
> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 11]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
>     +---------+--------------------+------------------------------------+
>     | Range   | Registration       | Note                               |
>     |         | Procedures         |                                    |
>     +---------+--------------------+------------------------------------+
>     | 0-191   | Standards Action   |                                    |
>     | 192-247 | RFC Required       |                                    |
>     | 248-251 | Experimental Use   | Reserved, not to be assigned       |
>     | 252-255 | Private Use        | Reserved, not to be assigned       |
>     +---------+--------------------+------------------------------------+
> 
>                 Table 2: Message Type registration procedures
> 
>     The updated assignments for the "Message Types" registry will look
>     like this:
> 
>     +---------+---------------------------------+-----------------------+
>     | Value   | Meaning                         | Reference             |
>     +---------+---------------------------------+-----------------------+
>     | 0       | Reserved                        | This document         |
>     | 1       | MPLS Echo Request               | [RFC8029]             |
>     | 2       | MPLS Echo Reply                 | [RFC8029]             |
>     | 3       | MPLS Proxy Ping Request         | [RFC7555]             |
>     | 4       | MPLS Proxy Ping Reply           | [RFC7555]             |
>     | 5       | MPLS Relayed Echo Reply         | [RFC7743]             |
>     | 6-247   | Unassigned                      |                       |
>     | 248-251 | Reserved for Experimental Use   | This document         |
>     | 252-255 | Reserved for Private Use        | [RFC8029]             |
>     +---------+---------------------------------+-----------------------+
> 
>              Table 3: Assignments for the Message Types registry
> 
> 6.1.2.  Updates to the Reply Modes registry
> 
>     This is the changes to the "Reply Modes" registry specified in this
>     document:
> 
>     o  Code Point 0 (zero) is marked Resereved.
> 
> [MC] Typo “Reserved”
   Fixed

> 
>     o  The registration procedure "Specification Required" is changed to
>        "RFC Required" and the comment "Experimental RFC needed" is
>        removed.
> 
>     o  Four code point has been taken from what was earlier
>        "Specification Required" to form a set of code points for
>        "Experimental Use".
> 
>     The registration procedures after the changes for the "Reply Modes"
>     registry are show in the table below:
> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 12]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
>     +---------+--------------------+------------------------------------+
>     | Range   | Registration       | Note                               |
>     |         | Procedures         |                                    |
>     +---------+--------------------+------------------------------------+
>     | 0-191   | Standards Action   |                                    |
>     | 192-247 | RFC Required       |                                    |
>     | 248-251 | Experimental Use   | Reserved, not to be assigned       |
>     | 252-255 | Private Use        | Reserved, not to be assigned       |
>     +---------+--------------------+------------------------------------+
> 
>                 Table 4: Reply Modes registration procedures
> 
>     The updated assignments for the "Reply Modes" registry will look like
>     this:
> 
>     +---------+---------------------------------+-----------------------+
>     | Value   | Meaning                         | Reference             |
>     +---------+---------------------------------+-----------------------+
>     | 0       | Reserved                        | This document         |
>     | 1       | Do not reply                    | [RFC8029]             |
>     | 2       | Reply via an IPv4/IPv6 UDP      | [RFC8029]             |
>     |         | packet                          |                       |
>     | 3       | Reply via an IPv4/IPv6 UDP      | [RFC8029]             |
>     |         | packet with Router Alert        |                       |
>     | 4       | Reply via application-level     | [RFC8029]             |
>     |         | control channel                 |                       |
>     | 5       | Reply via Specified Path        | [RFC7110]             |
>     | 6-247   | Unassigned                      |                       |
>     | 248-251 | Reserved for Experimental Use   | This document         |
>     | 252-255 | Reserved for Private Use        | [RFC8029]             |
>     +---------+---------------------------------+-----------------------+
> 
>               Table 5: Assignments for the Reply Modes registry
> 
> 6.1.3.  Updates to the Return Codes registry
> 
>     This is the changes to the "Return Codes" registry specified in this
>     document:
> 
>     o  The registration procedure "Specification Required" is changed to
>        "RFC Required" and the comment "Experimental RFC needed" is
>        removed.
> 
>     o  Four code point has been taken from what was earlier
>        "Specification Required" to form a set of code points for
>        "Experimental Use".
> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 13]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
>     The registration procedures after the changes for the "Return Codes"
>     registry are show in the table below:
> 
>     +---------+--------------------+------------------------------------+
>     | Range   | Registration       | Note                               |
>     |         | Procedures         |                                    |
>     +---------+--------------------+------------------------------------+
>     | 0-191   | Standards Action   |                                    |
>     | 192-247 | RFC Required       |                                    |
>     | 248-251 | Experimental Use   | Reserved, not to be assigned       |
>     | 252-255 | Private Use        | Reserved, not to be assigned       |
>     +---------+--------------------+------------------------------------+
> 
>                 Table 6: Return Codes registration procedures
> 
>     The updated assignments for the "Return Codes" registry will look
>     like this:
> 
>     +---------+----------------------------------+----------------------+
>     | Value   | Meaning                          | Reference            |
>     +---------+----------------------------------+----------------------+
>     | 0       | No Return Code                   | This document        |
>     | 1       | Malformed echo request received  | [RFC8029]            |
>     | 2       | One or more of the TLVs was not  | [RFC8029]            |
>     |         | understood                       |                      |
>     | 3       | Replying router is an egress for | [RFC8029]            |
>     |         | the FEC at stack-depth (RSC)     |                      |
>     | 4       | Replying router has no mapping   | [RFC8029]            |
>     |         | for the FEC at stack-depth (RSC) |                      |
>     | 5       | Downstream Mapping Mismatch (See | [RFC8029]            |
>     |         | [1])                             |                      |
>     | 6       | Upstream Interface Index Unknown | [RFC8029]            |
>     |         | (See [1])                        |                      |
>     | 7       | Reserved                         | [RFC8029]            |
>     | 8       | Label switched at stack-depth    | [RFC8029]            |
>     |         | (RSC)                            |                      |
>     | 9       | Label switched but no MPLS       | [RFC8029]            |
>     |         | forwarding at stack-depth (RSC)  |                      |
>     | 10      | Mapping for this FEC is not the  | [RFC8029]            |
>     |         | given label at stack-depth (RSC) |                      |
>     | 11      | No label entry at stack-depth    | [RFC8029]            |
>     |         | (RSC)                            |                      |
>     | 12      | Protocol not associated with     | [RFC8029]            |
>     |         | interface at FEC stack-depth     |                      |
>     |         | (RSC)                            |                      |
>     | 13      | Premature termination of ping    | [RFC8029]            |
>     |         | due to label stack shrinking to  |                      |
>     |         | a single label                   |                      |
> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 14]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
>     | 14      | See DDMAP TLV for meaning of     | [RFC8029]            |
>     |         | Return Code and Return Subcode   |                      |
>     |         | (See [2])                        |                      |
>     | 15      | Label switched with FEC change   | [RFC8029]            |
>     | 16      | Proxy Ping not authorized        | [RFC7555]            |
>     | 17      | Proxy Ping parameters need to be | [RFC7555]            |
>     |         | modified                         |                      |
>     | 18      | MPLS Echo Request could not be   | [RFC7555]            |
>     |         | sent                             |                      |
>     | 19      | Replying router has FEC mapping  | [RFC7555]            |
>     |         | for topmost FEC                  |                      |
>     | 20      | One or more TLVs not returned    | [RFC7743]            |
>     |         | due to MTU size                  |                      |
>     | 21      | OAM Problem/Unsupported BFD      | [RFC7759]            |
>     |         | Version                          |                      |
>     | 22      | OAM Problem/Unsupported BFD      | [RFC7759]            |
>     |         | Encapsulation format             |                      |
>     | 23      | OAM Problem/Unsupported BFD      | [RFC7759]            |
>     |         | Authentication Type              |                      |
>     | 24      | OAM Problem/Mismatch of BFD      | [RFC7759]            |
>     |         | Authentication Key ID            |                      |
>     | 25      | OAM Problem/Unsupported          | [RFC7759]            |
>     |         | Timestamp Format                 |                      |
>     | 26      | OAM Problem/Unsupported Delay    | [RFC7759]            |
>     |         | Mode                             |                      |
>     | 27      | OAM Problem/Unsupported Loss     | [RFC7759]            |
>     |         | Mode                             |                      |
>     | 28      | AM Problem/Delay variation       | [RFC7759]            |
>     |         | unsupported                      |                      |
>     | 29      | OAM Problem/Dyadic mode          | [RFC7759]            |
>     |         | unsupported                      |                      |
>     | 30      | OAM Problem/Loopback mode        | [RFC7759]            |
>     |         | unsupported                      |                      |
>     | 31      | OAM Problem/Combined mode        | [RFC7759]            |
>     |         | unsupported                      |                      |
>     | 32      | OAM Problem/Fault management     | [RFC7759]            |
>     |         | signaling unsupported            |                      |
>     | 33      | OAM Problem/Unable to create     | [RFC7759]            |
>     |         | fault management association     |                      |
>     | 34      | OAM Problem/PM Configuration     | [RFC7759]            |
>     |         | Error                            |                      |
>     | 35      | Mapping for this FEC is not      | [RFC8287] sec 7.4    |
>     |         | associated with the incoming     |                      |
>     |         | interface                        |                      |
>     | 36-247  | Unassigned                       | [RFC7759]            |
>     | 248-251 | Reserved for Experimental Use    | This document        |
>     | 252-255 | Reserved for Private Use         | [RFC8029]            |
>     +---------+----------------------------------+----------------------+
> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 15]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
>              Table 7: Assignments for the Return Codes registry
> 
> 6.2.  Updates to the TLV and sub-TLV registries
> 
>     The updates to the TLV and the sub-TLV registries are mostly the
>     same, however the Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 9 [IANA-Sub-9] has not been
>     updated.
> 
>     Note that when a field in an assigment table sayds "EQ", it means
>     that the field should not be changed as compared to the corresponding
>     field in the "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched
>     Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters" name space [IANA-LSP-PING]
> 
> [MC] Typos “assignment”, “says”
   Fixed

> 
> 6.2.1.  Updates to the TLVs registry
> 
>     This section describes the new registration procedures and the
>     assignments for the "TLVs" registry [IANA-TLV-reg] based on the new
>     registration procedures.
> 
>     The registration procedures has been changed the following way for
>     the "TLVs" registry.
> 
>     o  The "Specification Required" registration procedure has been
>        changed to "RFC Required", the comment "Experimental RFC Required"
>        has been removed.
> 
>     o  The code points registration procedure "Vendor Private Use" has
>        been removed and replaced with "First Come, First Served" code
>        points.
> 
>     o  Two small sets, 4 code points each, has been created for
>        Experimental Use.
> 
>     o  Code points that are reserved are clearly marked as such.
> 
>     o  The assignments have been updated to match the new registration
>        procedures.
> 
>     o  The notes related to the registration procedures have been changed
>        to reflect when a response is required or not if a TLV is not
>        recognized.
> 
>     The registration procedures for the "TLVs" registry [IANA-TLV-reg]
>     will now look like this:
> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 16]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
>     | Range       | Registration      | Note                            |
>     |             | Procedures        |                                 |
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
>     | 0-16383     | Standards Action  | This range is for TLVs that     |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 16384-31739 | RFC Required      | This range is for TLVs that     |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 31740-31743 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
>     | 31744-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for TLVs that     |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 32768-49161 | Standards Action  | This range is for TLVs that can |
>     |             |                   | be silently dropped if not      |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 49162-64507 | RFC Required      | This range is for TLVs that can |
>     |             |                   | be silently dropped if not      |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 64508-64511 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
>     | 64512-65535 | FCFS              | This range is for TLVs that can |
>     |             |                   | be silently dropped if not      |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
> 
>                     Table 8: TLV Registration Procedures
> 
>     The TLV Assignments will now look like this.
> 
>     Note that when a field in this table does say "EQ", it means that it
>     should be the same as the registry being updtated.
> 
> [MC] Typo “updated”
   Fixed

> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 17]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
>     +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
>     | Type        | TLV Name      | Reference       | Sub-TLV Registry  |
>     +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
>     | 0           | Reserved      | This document   |                   |
>     | 1-7         | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
>     | 8           | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     | 9-16        | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
>     | 17-19       | unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     | 20-27       | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
>     | 28-31739    | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     | 31740-31743 | Experimental  | This Document   | Reserved, not to  |
>     |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
>     | 31744-32767 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     | 32768-32770 | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
>     | 32771-64507 | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
>     | 64508-64511 | Experimental  | This document   | Resereved, not to |
>     |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
>     | 64512-65535 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
> 
> [MC] Typo “Reserved”
   Fixed
>                           Table 9: TLV Assignments
> 
> 6.2.2.  Updates to the registry for SubTLVs for TLVs 1, 16 and 21
> 
>     This section describes the new registration procedures and the
>     assignments for the "Sub-TLVs for TLV Types 1, 16, and 21"
>     [IANA-Sub-1-16-21] sub-registry based on the new registration
>     procedures.
> 
>     o  The "Specification Required" registration procedure has been
>        changed to "RFC Required", the comment "Experimental RFC Required"
>        has been removed.
> 
>     o  The code points registration procedure "Vendor Private Use" has
>        been removed and replaced with "First Come, First Served" code
>        points.
> 
>     o  Two small sets, 4 code points each, has been created for
>        Experimental Use.
> 
>     o  Code points that are reserved are clearly marked as such.
> 
>     o  The assignments have been updated to match the new registration
>        procedures.
> 
>     o  The notes related to the registration procedures have been changed
>        to reflect when a response is required if a sub-TLV is not
>        recognized or not.
> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 18]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
>     The registration procedures for the
>     "Sub-TLVs for TLV Types 1, 16, and 21" [IANA-Sub-1-16-21] sub-
>     registry will now look like this:
> 
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
>     | Range       | Registration      | Note                            |
>     |             | Procedures        |                                 |
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
>     | 0-16383     | Standards Action  | This range is for TLVs that     |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 16384-31739 | RFC Required      | This range is for TLVs that     |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 37140-37144 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
>     | 31748-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for TLVs that     |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 32768-49161 | Standards Action  | This range is for TLVs that can |
>     |             |                   | be silently dropped if not      |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 49162-64507 | RFC Required      | This range is for TLVs that can |
>     |             |                   | be silently dropped if not      |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 64508-64511 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
>     | 64512-65535 | FCFS              | This range is for TLVs that can |
>     |             |                   | be silently dropped if not      |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
> 
>     Table 10: Registration Procedures for Sub-TLVs for TLVs 1, 16 and 21
> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 19]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
>     +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
>     | Type        | TLV Name      | Reference       | Comment           |
>     +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
>     | 0           | Reserved      | This document   |                   |
>     | 1-4         | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
>     | 5           | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     | 6-8         | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
>     | 9           | EQ            | EQ              | DEPRECATED        |
>     | 9-20        | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
>     | 21          | unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     | 22-37       | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
>     | 38-31739    | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     | 31740-31743 | Experimental  | This Document   | Reserved, not to  |
>     |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
>     | 31744-64507 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     | 64508-64511 | Experimental  | This document   | Resereved, not to |
>     |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
>     | 64512-65535 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
> 
> [MC] Typo “Reserved”
   Fixed

> 
>              Table 11: Sub-TLV for TLV 1, 16 and 21 Assignments
> 
> 6.2.3.  Updates to the registry for SubTLVs for TLV 6
> 
>     This section describes the new registration procedures and the
>     assignments for the "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 6" [IANA-Sub-6] sub-
>     registry based on the new registration procedures.
> 
>     o  The "Specification Required" registration procedure has been
>        changed to "RFC Required", the comment "Experimental RFC Required"
>        has been removed.
> 
>     o  The code points registration procedure "Vendor Private Use" has
>        been removed and replaced with "First Come, First Served" code
>        points.
> 
>     o  Two small sets, 4 code points each, has been created for
>        Experimental Use.
> 
>     o  Code points that are reserved are clearly marked as such.
> 
>     o  The assignments have been updated to match the new registration
>        procedures.
> 
>     o  The notes related to the registration procedures have been changed
>        to reflect when a response is required if a sub-TLV is not
>        recognized or not.
> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 20]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
>     The registration procedures for the "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 6"
>     [IANA-Sub-6] sub-registry will now look like this:
> 
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
>     | Range       | Registration      | Note                            |
>     |             | Procedures        |                                 |
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
>     | 0-16383     | Standards Action  | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 16384-31739 | RFC Required      | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 37140-37144 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
>     | 31748-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 32768-49161 | Standards Action  | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 49162-64507 | RFC Required      | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 64508-64511 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
>     | 64512-65535 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
> 
>           Table 12: Registration Procedures for Sub-TLVs for TLVs 6
> 
>     +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
>     | Type        | TLV Name      | Reference       | Comment           |
>     +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
>     | 0           | Reserved      | This document   |                   |
>     | 1-2         | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
>     | 3-31739     | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     | 31740-31743 | Experimental  | This Document   | Reserved, not to  |
>     |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
>     | 31744-64507 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     | 64508-64511 | Experimental  | This document   | Resereved, not to |
>     |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
>     | 64512-65535 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
> 
> [MC] Typo “Reserved”
   Fixed

> 
>                   Table 13: Sub-TLVs for TLV 6 Assignments
> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 21]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
> 6.2.4.  Updates to the registry for SubTLVs for TLV 11
> 
>     This section describes the new registration procedures and the
>     assignments for the "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 11" [IANA-Sub-11] sub-
>     registry based on the new registration procedures.
> 
>     o  The "Specification Required" registration procedure has been
>        changed to "RFC Required", the comment "Experimental RFC Required"
>        has been removed.
> 
>     o  The code points registration procedure "Vendor Private Use" has
>        been removed and replaced with "First Come, First Served" code
>        points.
> 
>     o  Two small sets, 4 code points each, has been created for
>        Experimental Use.
> 
>     o  Code points that are reserved are clearly marked as such.
> 
>     o  The assignments have been updated to match the new registration
>        procedures.
> 
>     o  The notes related to the registration procedures have been changed
>        to reflect when a response is required if a sub-TLV is not
>        recognized or not.
> 
>     The registration procedures for the "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 11"
>     [IANA-Sub-11] sub-registry will now look like this:
> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 22]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
>     | Range       | Registration      | Note                            |
>     |             | Procedures        |                                 |
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
>     | 0-16383     | Standards Action  | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 16384-31739 | RFC Required      | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 37140-37144 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
>     | 31748-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 32768-49161 | Standards Action  | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 49162-64507 | RFC Required      | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 64508-64511 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
>     | 64512-65535 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
> 
>          Table 14: Registration Procedures for Sub-TLVs for TLVs 11
> 
>     +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
>     | Type        | TLV Name      | Reference       | Comment           |
>     +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
>     | 0           | Reserved      | This document   |                   |
>     | 1-4         | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
>     | 5-31739     | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     | 31740-31743 | Experimental  | This Document   | Reserved, not to  |
>     |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
>     | 31744-64507 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     | 64508-64511 | Experimental  | This document   | Resereved, not to |
>     |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
>     | 64512-65535 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
> 
> [MC] Typo “Reserved”
  Fixed

> 
>                   Table 15: Sub-TLVs for TLV 11 Assignments
> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 23]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
> 6.2.5.  Updates to the registry for SubTLVs for TLV 20
> 
>     This section describes the new registration procedures and the
>     assignments for the "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 20" [IANA-Sub-20] sub-
>     registry based on the new registration procedures.
> 
>     o  The "Specification Required" registration procedure has been
>        changed to "RFC Required", the comment "Experimental RFC Required"
>        has been removed.
> 
>     o  The code points registration procedure "Vendor Private Use" has
>        been removed and replaced with "First Come, First Served" code
>        points.
> 
>     o  Two small sets, 4 code points each, has been created for
>        Experimental Use.
> 
>     o  Code points that are reserved are clearly marked as such.
> 
>     o  The assignments have been updated to match the new registration
>        procedures.
> 
>     o  The notes related to the registration procedures have been changed
>        to reflect when a response is required if a sub-TLV is not
>        recognized or not.
> 
>     The registration procedures for the "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 20"
>     [IANA-Sub-20] sub-registry will now look like this:
> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 24]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
>     | Range       | Registration      | Note                            |
>     |             | Procedures        |                                 |
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
>     | 0-16383     | Standards Action  | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 16384-31739 | RFC Required      | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 37140-37144 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
>     | 31748-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 32768-49161 | Standards Action  | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 49162-64507 | RFC Required      | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 64508-64511 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
>     | 64512-65535 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
> 
>          Table 16: Registration Procedures for Sub-TLVs for TLVs 20
> 
>     +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
>     | Type        | TLV Name      | Reference       | Comment           |
>     +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
>     | 0           | Reserved      | This document   |                   |
>     | 1-5         | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
>     | 6-31739     | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     | 31740-31743 | Experimental  | This Document   | Reserved, not to  |
>     |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
>     | 31744-64507 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     | 64508-64511 | Experimental  | This document   | Resereved, not to |
>     |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
>     | 64512-65535 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
> 
> [MC] Typo “Reserved”
   Fixed

> 
>                   Table 17: Sub-TLVs for TLV 20 Assignments
> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 25]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
> 6.2.6.  Updates to the registry for SubTLVs for TLV 23
> 
>     This section describes the new registration procedures and the
>     assignments for the "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 23" [IANA-Sub-23] sub-
>     registry based on the new registration procedures.
> 
>     o  The "Specification Required" registration procedure has been
>        changed to "RFC Required", the comment "Experimental RFC Required"
>        has been removed.
> 
>     o  The code points registration procedure "Vendor Private Use" has
>        been removed and replaced with "First Come, First Served" code
>        points.
> 
>     o  Two small sets, 4 code points each, has been created for
>        Experimental Use.
> 
>     o  Code points that are reserved are clearly marked as such.
> 
>     o  The assignments have been updated to match the new registration
>        procedures.
> 
>     o  The notes related to the registration procedures have been changed
>        to reflect when a response is required if a sub-TLV is not
>        recognized or not.
> 
>     The registration procedures for the "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 23"
>     [IANA-Sub-23] sub-registry will now look like this:
> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 26]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
>     | Range       | Registration      | Note                            |
>     |             | Procedures        |                                 |
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
>     | 0-16383     | Standards Action  | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 16384-31739 | RFC Required      | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 37140-37144 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
>     | 31748-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 32768-49161 | Standards Action  | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 49162-64507 | RFC Required      | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 64508-64511 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
>     | 64512-65535 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
> 
>          Table 18: Registration Procedures for Sub-TLVs for TLVs 23
> 
>     +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
>     | Type        | TLV Name      | Reference       | Comment           |
>     +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
>     | 0           | Reserved      | [RFC7555]       |                   |
>     | 1           | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
>     | 2-31739     | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     | 31740-31743 | Experimental  | This Document   | Reserved, not to  |
>     |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
>     | 31744-64507 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     | 64508-64511 | Experimental  | This document   | Resereved, not to |
>     |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
>     | 64512-65535 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
> 
> [MC] Typo “Reserved”
   Fixed

> 
>                   Table 19: Sub-TLVs for TLV 23 Assignments
> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 27]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
> 6.2.7.  Updates to the registry for SubTLVs for TLV 27
> 
>     This section describes the new registration procedures and the
>     assignments for the "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 27" [IANA-Sub-27] sub-
>     registry based on the new registration procedures.
> 
>     o  The "Specification Required" registration procedure has been
>        changed to "RFC Required", the comment "Experimental RFC Required"
>        has been removed.
> 
>     o  The code points registration procedure "Vendor Private Use" has
>        been removed and replaced with "First Come, First Served" code
>        points.
> 
>     o  Two small sets, 4 code points each, has been created for
>        Experimental Use.
> 
>     o  Code points that are reserved are clearly marked as such.
> 
>     o  The assignments have been updated to match the new registration
>        procedures.
> 
>     o  The notes related to the registration procedures have been changed
>        to reflect when a response is required if a sub-TLV is not
>        recognized or not.
> 
>     The registration procedures for the "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 27"
>     [IANA-Sub-27] sub-registry will now look like this:
> 
> Andersson, et al.        Expires March 28, 2021                [Page 28]
> Internet-Draft             LSP Ping Registries            September 2020
> 
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
>     | Range       | Registration      | Note                            |
>     |             | Procedures        |                                 |
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
>     | 0-16383     | Standards Action  | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 16384-31739 | RFC Required      | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 37140-37144 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
>     | 31748-32767 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | require an error message if not |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 32768-49161 | Standards Action  | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 49162-64507 | RFC Required      | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     | 64508-64511 | Experimental Use  | Reserved, not to be assigned    |
>     | 64512-65535 | FCFS              | This range is for Sub-TLVs that |
>     |             |                   | can be silently dropped if not  |
>     |             |                   | recognized.                     |
>     +-------------+-------------------+---------------------------------+
> 
>           Table 20: Registration Procedures for Sub-TLVs for TLV 27
> 
>     +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
>     | Type        | TLV Name      | Reference       | Comment           |
>     +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
>     | 0           | Reserved      | [RFC7555]       |                   |
>     | 1           | EQ            | EQ              | EQ                |
>     | 2-31739     | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     | 31740-31743 | Experimental  | This Document   | Reserved, not to  |
>     |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
>     | 31744-64507 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     | 64508-64511 | Experimental  | This document   | Resereved, not to |
>     |             | Use           |                 | be assigned       |
>     | 64512-65535 | Unassigned    |                 |                   |
>     +-------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
> 
>                   Table 21: Sub-TLVs for TLV 27 Assignments
> 


/Loa
-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64


From nobody Fri Oct 23 03:46:07 2020
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD523A0BA5; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 03:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.20.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: mpls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <160344995664.21878.9276974170227745696@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 03:45:56 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/V2JhYgqGSGH2VZhGi7egUeVSf7c>
Subject: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-05.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 10:45:58 -0000

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG of the IETF.

        Title           : Updating the IANA MPLS LSP Ping Parameters
        Authors         : Loa Andersson
                          Mach Chen
                          Carlos Pignataro
                          Tarek Saad
	Filename        : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-05.txt
	Pages           : 33
	Date            : 2020-10-23

Abstract:
   This document updates RFC 8029 and RFC 8611 that both define IANA
   registries for MPLS LSP Ping.  It also updates the description of the
   procedures for the responses sent when an unknown or erroneous code
   point is found.  The updates are to clarify and align this name space
   with recent developments.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-05
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-05

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-05


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/



From nobody Fri Oct 23 03:55:25 2020
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8905C3A0976; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 03:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8QUjVkKp_Z1y; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 03:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D3BA3A0966; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 03:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (unknown [124.104.122.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 55D1131D22B; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:55:17 +0200 (CEST)
References: <160344995664.21878.9276974170227745696@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, Deborah A Brungard <db3546@att.com>, "mpls-ads@ietf.org" <mpls-ads@ietf.org>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <160344995664.21878.9276974170227745696@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <9df646be-085c-f0f3-fb72-aa7d4e9dd8da@pi.nu>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:55:15 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <160344995664.21878.9276974170227745696@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/lHGwJ3ptE6GmkSwEqjq0_KCcm5I>
Subject: [mpls] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-05.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 10:55:24 -0000

Workimg Group,

I have just posted version -05 of 
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update. This version addresses 
(almost) all WGLC comments and should be ready to send to the IESG for 
approval and publication.

There is one comment on naming IANA registries that is not addressed, I 
did not think this draft was the right place to address this issue.

I'm planning to post a new draft on this on Monday the latest.

/Loa

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-05.txt
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 03:45:56 -0700
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
CC: mpls@ietf.org


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG of the 
IETF.

         Title           : Updating the IANA MPLS LSP Ping Parameters
         Authors         : Loa Andersson
                           Mach Chen
                           Carlos Pignataro
                           Tarek Saad
	Filename        : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-05.txt
	Pages           : 33
	Date            : 2020-10-23

Abstract:
    This document updates RFC 8029 and RFC 8611 that both define IANA
    registries for MPLS LSP Ping.  It also updates the description of the
    procedures for the responses sent when an unknown or erroneous code
    point is found.  The updates are to clarify and align this name space
    with recent developments.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-05
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-05

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-05


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/


_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
I-D-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt

-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64


From nobody Fri Oct 23 14:17:30 2020
Return-Path: <agenda@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975B73A10A0; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "\"IETF Secretariat\"" <agenda@ietf.org>
To: <mach@huawei.com>, <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Cc: db3546@att.com, mpls@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.20.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <160348774760.5087.16088026095557875872@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:15:47 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/wA6p5j8KLcgTr9mWAEFqno9SZlo>
Subject: [mpls] mpls - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 109
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 21:15:51 -0000

Dear Mach Chen,

The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled.
Below is the scheduled session information followed by
the original request. 


    mpls Session 1 (2:00 requested)
    Friday, 20 November 2020, Session I 1200-1400
    Room Name: Room 5 size: 505
    ---------------------------------------------


iCalendar: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/109/sessions/mpls.ics

Request Information:


---------------------------------------------------------
Working Group Name: Multiprotocol Label Switching
Area Name: Routing Area
Session Requester: Mach Chen


Number of Sessions: 1
Length of Session(s):  2 Hours
Number of Attendees: 80
Conflicts to Avoid: 

 Technology Overlap: spring pce ccamp detnet bier bess nvo3 teas






People who must be present:
  Loa Andersson
  Deborah Brungard
  Mach Chen
  Nicolai Leymann
  Tarek Saad

Resources Requested:

Special Requests:
  
---------------------------------------------------------



From nobody Mon Oct 26 10:54:36 2020
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0C33A0E11; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.20.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: mpls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <160373486579.2152.9085511453404040709@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:54:25 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/9o5jO-WCWDsH0MeMjCifwRwSuUE>
Subject: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-17.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:54:32 -0000

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG of the IETF.

        Title           : A YANG Data Model for MPLS Base
        Authors         : Tarek Saad
                          Kamran Raza
                          Rakesh Gandhi
                          Xufeng Liu
                          Vishnu Pavan Beeram
	Filename        : draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-17.txt
	Pages           : 30
	Date            : 2020-10-26

Abstract:
   This document contains a specification of the MPLS base YANG data
   model.  The MPLS base YANG data model serves as a base framework for
   configuring and managing an MPLS switching subsystem on an MPLS-
   enabled router.  It is expected that other MPLS YANG data models
   (e.g.  MPLS Label Switched Path (LSP) Static, LDP or RSVP-TE YANG
   models) will augment the MPLS base YANG data model.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-17
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-17

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-17


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/



From nobody Mon Oct 26 14:41:31 2020
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675EA3A101A; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:41:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: "IETF-Announce" <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.21.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Cc: loa@pi.nu, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, db3546@att.com, mpls@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <160374848735.28220.12487828161596394494@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:41:27 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/tKXy7MZ0D6a7pnsnZsrhL4wtNFw>
Subject: [mpls] Protocol Action: 'A YANG Data Model for MPLS Base' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-17.txt)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:41:30 -0000

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'A YANG Data Model for MPLS Base'
  (draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-17.txt) as Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working
Group.

The IESG contact persons are Alvaro Retana, Martin Vigoureux and Deborah
Brungard.

A URL of this Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang/





Technical Summary

This document contains a specification of the MPLS base YANG model.
The MPLS base YANG model serves as a base framework for configuring
and managing an MPLS switching subsystem on an MPLS-enabled router.
It is expected that other MPLS YANG models (e.g.  MPLS Label Switched
Path (LSP) Static, LDP or RSVP-TE YANG models) will augment the MPLS
base YANG model.

Working Group Summary

The working group is solidly behind that the document.

Document Quality

We understand that there are implementations and intents to implement
this YANG model from a large number of vendors. However we have no
documented implementations or intent to implement.

An implementation poll has therefore been sent to the working group
mailing list.

Tom Petch has done very thorough review and had a positive influence
on the document.

The document has been reviewed by the Yang Doctors several times.

Personnel

Who is the Document Shepherd for this document?  Loa Andersson
Who is the Responsible Area Director?  Deborah Brungard


From nobody Mon Oct 26 17:55:17 2020
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6B03A1134 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3ktg-6VgWnSo for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A403E3A1001 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id m16so12775375ljo.6 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;  h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;  bh=C2pzIyUAM//X55cJM4RHq5UHfG4z7dEyVw9P8864wgc=; b=u+6V5hU/Ssexd8G466hJyl3JH+gfs4BjZrbkegwm8meFxUy8G6EOSOqEub0qL+FJId IOzKIdMP1rUBx95n2i1RtF0yw23OkJXwSPWOxfV2prGwukipbZ4Z9n9Ne9vmEhV7ezWy nIXMy3OMxP3SSrLT8L4ItAe2d2gvMQyyS1yPksVRDwk819rLKWWCC4qxItieZ5VrQ5EI 8JgI2HmPQGRx1q/HFhpEVtQCgEOyozmk0qvA2uAyMH5+9zQFMH/Bi4wZQu/l0WWNEa2U f6pRL4MjRGanojY8aUqS3YhGRyR+uNBzGykO/YpXYF7x90BCkXmniD2CS6s7Ka0LjjMp m3lQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=C2pzIyUAM//X55cJM4RHq5UHfG4z7dEyVw9P8864wgc=; b=EGKNCUZ0ej5WYH5Gys1mzQGqwvmd1OBmZ1I4yXhVNsiz6fT2xUwz+97XTHrtmUdpfb yZhLYj5eOK72kmB6B6mTznTYmsYPmjnxShd13aml8tkJveQ9HtZySEFrTTMiP2rG9yrt oBcJ4vr0oij3G7r8xh3TQzehWIERaXt6HEu9CZb0uoM9eesZTRTtk+AiGaz4jOpPwr3m loeWmO8yBQ8diuwy6n+uiW8oPzH1LrjeyPNjg2mVMlO6N6/rjqj7BMiKnxiAwAN29+OB BKhP+QaqnClEFttDfN8E8thMWeaq8lGorjU3RJpiqA6ERXUw1+h9Fo6hBDERRbIJc1PW Z/JQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530L37gGYKtUI5fVoxfuO9d+nApgp2LQDmFzAKPwz32gTZ/ZgskL u52aMYPdPZcu9uJ9C+58RHD8gUQTje/56R+Fm/YbZKB2
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzkXUjG/EMgEC3LLGbBndvm6DGvCn1+duB9XjdULRXU6C+AsUMZy5AigGK3QpKaub6AZSR2LJWEs6SRd5ct2XE=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9657:: with SMTP id z23mr7375294ljh.8.1603760111382; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160363611190.22997.1047697548733839217@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <160363611190.22997.1047697548733839217@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:55:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmUGMUaW5p86rv6WrwNEjCqcz4G74OOZXaPbeo_Oih20Lw@mail.gmail.com>
To: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>,  Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>,  Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000be738f05b29c7f8e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/ccRVIS4KTZX3EXXlhjftFsQF4Ns>
Subject: [mpls] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 00:55:16 -0000

--000000000000be738f05b29c7f8e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Dear All,
updates in the new version are to address comments and suggestions from Loa
(many thanks!). Also, we've investigated how the active OAM would work in
SFC-MPLS (SFC with MPLS forwarding plane) and proposed the solution using
G-ACh and GAL,
Much appreciate your comments, questions, and suggestions.

Regards,
Yao and Greg

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 7:28 AM
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01.txt
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, Liu Yao <liu.yao71@zte.com.cn>



A new version of I-D, draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Liu Yao and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification
Revision:       01
Title:          MPLS-based Service Function Path(SFP) Consistency
Verification
Document date:  2020-10-25
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          14
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification/
Htmlized:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification
Htmlized:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01
Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01

Abstract:
   This document proposes a method to verify the correlation between
   Service Function Chaining control and/or management plane view of the
   specified Service Function Path and the state of its data.  It works
   for both SR service programming and MPLS-based NSH SFC.

   This document defines the signaling of the Generic Associated Channel
   (G-ACh) over a Service Function Path (SFP) with an MPLS forwarding
   plane using the basic unit defined in RFC 8595.  The document also
   describes the processing of the G-ACh by the elements of the SFP.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

--000000000000be738f05b29c7f8e
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Dear All,<div>updates in the new version are to address co=
mments and suggestions from Loa (many thanks!). Also, we&#39;ve investigate=
d how the active OAM would work in SFC-MPLS (SFC with MPLS forwarding plane=
) and proposed the solution using G-ACh and GAL,</div><div>Much appreciate =
your comments, questions, and suggestions.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards=
,</div><div>Yao and Greg<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr"=
 class=3D"gmail_attr">---------- Forwarded message ---------<br>From: <span=
 dir=3D"auto">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org">internet-draf=
ts@ietf.org</a>&gt;</span><br>Date: Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 7:28 AM<br>Subject=
: New Version Notification for draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01.txt<b=
r>To: Greg Mirsky &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com">gregimirsky@=
gmail.com</a>&gt;, Liu Yao &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:liu.yao71@zte.com.cn">liu.=
yao71@zte.com.cn</a>&gt;<br></div><br><br><br>
A new version of I-D, draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01.txt<br>
has been successfully submitted by Liu Yao and posted to the<br>
IETF repository.<br>
<br>
Name:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verifi=
cation<br>
Revision:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A001<br>
Title:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 MPLS-based Service Function Path(S=
FP) Consistency Verification<br>
Document date:=C2=A0 2020-10-25<br>
Group:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Individual Submission<br>
Pages:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 14<br>
URL:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 <a href=3D"https://www.ietf.o=
rg/archive/id/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01.txt" rel=3D"noreferrer=
" target=3D"_blank">https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-=
verification-01.txt</a><br>
Status:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"https://datatracker.iet=
f.org/doc/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification/" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=
=3D"_blank">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verific=
ation/</a><br>
Htmlized:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"https://datatracker.ietf.org=
/doc/html/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D=
"_blank">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verif=
ication</a><br>
Htmlized:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"https://tools.ietf.org/html/=
draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank=
">https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01</a><br=
>
Diff:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"https://www.ietf.o=
rg/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01" rel=3D"noreferrer=
" target=3D"_blank">https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-lm-mpls-sfc-p=
ath-verification-01</a><br>
<br>
Abstract:<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0This document proposes a method to verify the correlation betw=
een<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Service Function Chaining control and/or management plane view=
 of the<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0specified Service Function Path and the state of its data.=C2=
=A0 It works<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0for both SR service programming and MPLS-based NSH SFC.<br>
<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0This document defines the signaling of the Generic Associated =
Channel<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0(G-ACh) over a Service Function Path (SFP) with an MPLS forwar=
ding<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0plane using the basic unit defined in RFC 8595.=C2=A0 The docu=
ment also<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0describes the processing of the G-ACh by the elements of the S=
FP.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submissio=
n<br>
until the htmlized version and diff are available at <a href=3D"http://tool=
s.ietf.org" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">tools.ietf.org</a>.<br>
<br>
The IETF Secretariat<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></div>

--000000000000be738f05b29c7f8e--


From nobody Wed Oct 28 15:28:38 2020
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308A83A09EC; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: "IETF-Announce" <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.21.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org, db3546@att.com, draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org, tsaad.net@gmail.com, Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <160392410318.20485.4117192819757990471@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:28:23 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/6dslasNKuaIT3kf0N1frt7E5xlA>
Subject: [mpls] Protocol Action: 'Synonymous Flow Label Framework' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework-11.txt)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 22:28:30 -0000

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Synonymous Flow Label Framework'
  (draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework-11.txt) as Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working
Group.

The IESG contact persons are Alvaro Retana, Martin Vigoureux and Deborah
Brungard.

A URL of this Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework/





Technical Summary

RFC 8372 (MPLS Flow Identification Considerations) describes the
requirement for introducing flow identities within the MPLS
architecture.  This document describes a method of accomplishing this
by using a technique called Synonymous Flow Labels in which labels
which mimic the behaviour of other labels provide the identification
service.  These identifiers can be used to trigger per-flow
operations on the packet at the receiving label switching router.

Working Group Summary

The Working Group has reached consensus that this document is useful
and should be published This document went through multiple reviews
within the working group over the course of its development. The techniques
defined in this document are useful in several applications, such as the
measurement of the number of received packets in a flow for performance
monitoring, triggering IPFIX inspection, triggering other types of Deep Packet
Inspection, or identification of the packet source. 

Document Quality

Review was done by MPLS review-team (MPLS-RT) and from several
members of the WG. All comments have been addressed, and there are
currently no open issues.

Personnel

   Who is the Document Shepherd for this document?  Tarek Saad
   Who is the Responsible Area Director?  Deborah Brungard


From nobody Fri Oct 30 23:31:01 2020
Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF0A3A0B5D; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 23:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UIjkYvU-ZjkW; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 23:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD8D03A0B5B; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 23:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml708-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 74E32B26BD3D3325EF88; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 06:30:56 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from lhreml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.57) by lhreml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1913.5; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 06:30:55 +0000
Received: from DGGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.33) by lhreml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.1913.5 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 06:30:55 +0000
Received: from DGGEML510-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.184]) by DGGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::74d9:c659:fbec:21fa%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 14:30:49 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
CC: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Presentation Slot Requests for IETF 109th
Thread-Index: AdavTnHrjXcJFHoRRfSEL8HJjqv90g==
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 06:30:49 +0000
Message-ID: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE297F4596D@dggeml510-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.108.243.140]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/p0f4TGC9-khDD78PW5xQ12Hf9xw>
Subject: [mpls] Presentation Slot Requests for IETF 109th
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 06:31:00 -0000

Hi all,

If you want a time slot to discuss a topic during IETF 109th meeting, pleas=
e send your request to me and cc the mpls-chairs@ietf.org, including the dr=
aft name, speaker and desired duration.

BTW, MPLS session (Session 1) is on Friday, November 20, 2020.

Best regards,
Mach (MPLS WG Secretary)

