Subject: Re: draft-ietf-nasreq-criteria-05.txt Edits

From: Randy Bush <[email-masked]> (by way of David Mitton <[email-masked]>)
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 15:31:00 -0500

the iesg revied your proposed rfc editor note today. it was not accpted.
the unanimous conclusion was

no udp because to meet 2914 would have to reinvent [s]tcp.  such efforts
have a longtrack record of failure.

either

   o sctp is mandatory, or

   o sctp and tcp are both mandatory on servers and proxies, but nass may
     implement either

randy