From sethomso@cisco.com Tue Jul 7 12:57:51 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: nea@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: nea@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF3428C52B for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:57:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6blOYEkOkFC4 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:57:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071BD28C548 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:57:49 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.42,364,1243814400"; d="scan'208";a="49668492" Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Jul 2009 19:57:30 +0000 Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n67JvUhN002521 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 15:57:30 -0400 Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n67JvUOv011116 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 19:57:30 GMT Received: from xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 7 Jul 2009 15:57:30 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 15:57:29 -0400 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Remaining comments on NEA PB-TNC spec Thread-Index: Acn/PSixO6sIvPt+QNiJnO9dIwLcOQ== From: "Susan Thomson (sethomso)" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jul 2009 19:57:30.0602 (UTC) FILETIME=[29324CA0:01C9FF3D] DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=587; t=1246996650; x=1247860650; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=sethomso@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Susan=20Thomson=20(sethomso)=22=20 |Subject:=20Remaining=20comments=20on=20NEA=20PB-TNC=20spec |Sender:=20 |To:=20; bh=jO55QI2D14zENlTUc4KLLliVNHTN9RBYSgnhUn8IUgg=; b=jlpD1vrU2iK5fvBImetK3W0xQ4FRN/XpKdzR0NGbT7Es9ELb7ZUbR6LeuS gaXpU6WylbqLdlSvQsMo09TX/hPoncz7mO2QN0w6HXtk4YSNN0BIJatX7xWp KyIyJr2Uw3; Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=sethomso@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; ); Subject: [Nea] Remaining comments on NEA PB-TNC spec X-BeenThere: nea@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Network Endpoint Assessment discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:57:51 -0000 I noticed a couple of nits when last reviewing draft-ietf-nea-pb-tnc-04.txt: 1. Retry-Acknowledge flag : The current text is a legacy of the original state machine, and needs to be changed. I believe that this functionality is no longer needed with the current state machine, and can be removed.=20 2. There is a typo in Section 4.1 where the Version header field should be 2 for Version Not Supported errors. Version error handling is correctly specified in Section 4.9.2. It would be good if these could be addressed in the next version of the spec. Thanks Susan From shanna@juniper.net Wed Jul 8 09:16:36 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: nea@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: nea@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8B33A6C10 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 09:16:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cmPiOBQARr2Q for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 09:16:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exprod7og116.obsmtp.com (exprod7og116.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.219]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8223A6C2A for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 09:16:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob116.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSlTGfUTTQpAEk0w/IH3tCPIhLme03Y0q@postini.com; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:17:03 PDT Received: from p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.25) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.375.2; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 09:10:05 -0700 Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::8002:d3e7:4146:af5f]) by p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::c126:c633:d2dc:8090%11]) with mapi; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:10:04 -0400 From: Stephen Hanna To: "Susan Thomson (sethomso)" , "nea@ietf.org" Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:09:48 -0400 Thread-Topic: Remaining comments on NEA PB-TNC spec Thread-Index: Acn/PSixO6sIvPt+QNiJnO9dIwLcOQAqPBQw Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Nea] Remaining comments on NEA PB-TNC spec X-BeenThere: nea@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Network Endpoint Assessment discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:16:36 -0000 Thanks for catching these problems, Susan. You're right on both counts. Since these are errors in the current spec, I don't think it's necessary to complete a lengthy check of WG consensus before fixing them. However, if anyone has concerns or comments on these issues, please raise them now. Thanks, Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: nea-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:nea-bounces@ietf.org] On=20 > Behalf Of Susan Thomson (sethomso) > Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 3:57 PM > To: nea@ietf.org > Subject: [Nea] Remaining comments on NEA PB-TNC spec >=20 > I noticed a couple of nits when last reviewing > draft-ietf-nea-pb-tnc-04.txt: >=20 > 1. Retry-Acknowledge flag : The current text is a legacy of=20 > the original > state machine, and needs to be changed. I believe that this > functionality is no longer needed with the current state machine, and > can be removed.=20 >=20 > 2. There is a typo in Section 4.1 where the Version header=20 > field should > be 2 for Version Not Supported errors. Version error handling is > correctly specified in Section 4.9.2. >=20 > It would be good if these could be addressed in the next=20 > version of the > spec. >=20 > Thanks > Susan > _______________________________________________ > Nea mailing list > Nea@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea > = From sethomso@cisco.com Fri Jul 17 12:53:28 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: nea@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: nea@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9CA3A6EE6 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:53:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id asp6e678ot2d for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:53:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088933A69BA for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:53:24 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAPNzYEqrR7PD/2dsb2JhbAC4JogjkQQFhA0 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.43,223,1246838400"; d="scan'208";a="348921170" Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Jul 2009 19:53:57 +0000 Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n6HJrvN6030837 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:53:57 -0700 Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6HJrZVo008502 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:53:57 GMT Received: from xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:53:37 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:53:36 -0400 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Draft agenda for NEA WG at IETF 75 Thread-Index: AcoHGEW+tbEwzD8QS4qC6QqFUye/uw== From: "Susan Thomson (sethomso)" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jul 2009 19:53:37.0087 (UTC) FILETIME=[46243CF0:01CA0718] DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=996; t=1247860437; x=1248724437; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=sethomso@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Susan=20Thomson=20(sethomso)=22=20 |Subject:=20Draft=20agenda=20for=20NEA=20WG=20at=20IETF=207 5 |Sender:=20; bh=p/tD8d0HoYI72NRaE66qeWHWPLXjlN1l/z9fjwAOeAk=; b=L5EH2U1XmkzmrDbbMxt5WwtNNU6nKl9mXRfNtGNv5SKSBmq4AnrUCjJsSe f75oZaaStkqOTRYJZNxD0e4bITSwI+yYneU1vhM7VSXduMvdbbgd9apvYAyN B0erWNcnXO; Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=sethomso@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; ); Subject: [Nea] Draft agenda for NEA WG at IETF 75 X-BeenThere: nea@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Network Endpoint Assessment discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:53:28 -0000 Below is the draft agenda for IETF 75. Please send proposed changes to the chairs. Thanks Susan ---------------------------------------- Agenda for IETF 75 NEA WG meeting =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Date: Monday, July 27, 2009 Time: 1740-1940 PDT=20 WG Charter: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/nea-charter.html WG Tools: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/nea WG email: nea@ietf.org 1740 Administrivia Blue Sheets Jabber & Minute scribes Agenda bashing 1745 WG Status 1750 Discuss PB-TNC (IETF LC and IESG comments) http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nea-pb-tnc-04.txt 1820 Discuss PA-TNC (IETF LC and IESG comments) http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nea-pa-tnc-04.txt 1850 Discuss proposed charter updates =20 1915 Process for soliciting proposals on Posture Transport protocol 1930 Review Milestones and Next Steps 1940 Adjourn From shanna@juniper.net Sun Jul 26 22:29:33 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: nea@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: nea@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359DB3A692A for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:29:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.316 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.316 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.283, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZBNYYyQWGy-W for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:29:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exprod7og104.obsmtp.com (exprod7og104.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350BC3A6BE9 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:29:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob104.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSm07LVrzb54mlIj/nNb95QBKgNLqMPGo@postini.com; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:29:33 PDT Received: from p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.24) by P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.375.2; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:22:18 -0700 Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::d0d1:653d:5b91:a123%11]) with mapi; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:22:17 -0400 From: Stephen Hanna To: "nea@ietf.org" Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:21:52 -0400 Thread-Topic: NEA dinner tonight? Thread-Index: AcoOeiYCmL/COhw+T82ganHOTsHGMA== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Nea] NEA dinner tonight? X-BeenThere: nea@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Network Endpoint Assessment discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:29:33 -0000 I know it's a bit late but if some NEA-WG members would like to have dinner tonight after our meeting, I'd love to do so. Let's just gather after the meeting and find some place to go. Thanks, Steve From shanna@juniper.net Mon Jul 27 01:50:07 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: nea@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: nea@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39F928C266 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:50:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.411 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.411 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.188, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tOm9lJ0IFkRb for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:50:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exprod7og103.obsmtp.com (exprod7og103.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.159]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EDC28C26B for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:49:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob103.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSm1qAlq3c2yDgyF6+T/rOLBm/LxhSvq7@postini.com; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:49:06 PDT Received: from p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.24) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.375.2; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:46:50 -0700 Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::d0d1:653d:5b91:a123%11]) with mapi; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 04:46:49 -0400 From: Stephen Hanna To: "nea@ietf.org" Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 04:46:23 -0400 Thread-Topic: Slides for NEA-WG have been posted Thread-Index: AcoOlrgWHdOrr8s0Shy7sgDXBwJXvA== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Nea] Slides for NEA-WG have been posted X-BeenThere: nea@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Network Endpoint Assessment discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:50:07 -0000 I have posted the slides that we will use for the NEA-WG meeting at this URL: http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/75/slides/nea-0.ppt We should have audio streaming for the event at this URL: http://feed.verilan.com/ietf/stream01.m3u And I will try to set up a phone bridge for anyone who would like to participate by telephone. Here is the phone bridge information: Conference Dial-in Number: (712) 432-0111 Access Code: 190528# I can't guarantee that the phone bridge will work but it may be a nice alternative to Jabber for some. Let's give it a try! Thanks, Steve From shanna@juniper.net Wed Jul 29 06:24:46 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: nea@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: nea@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A324D3A6FFC for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:24:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.505 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.505 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.094, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8-1kDnS3D8nF for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:24:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exprod7og122.obsmtp.com (exprod7og122.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.22]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3DDB3A6E92 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:24:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob122.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSnBNnyN235Rs3O4puaammo2mizvn7FjH@postini.com; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:24:47 PDT Received: from p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.25) by P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.375.2; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:23:09 -0700 Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::c126:c633:d2dc:8090%11]) with mapi; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:23:08 -0400 From: Stephen Hanna To: "nea@ietf.org" Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:23:07 -0400 Thread-Topic: NEA WG report Thread-Index: AcmsH8hXHsgwY+dwSw2KhPdJ5ABQdAAqbGlgGL0rjFAAGHfm4A== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Nea] FW: NEA WG report X-BeenThere: nea@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Network Endpoint Assessment discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:24:46 -0000 Here is a brief summary of Monday's NEA WG meeting. More complete minutes will follow soon. Thanks, Steve=20 -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Hanna=20 Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 10:16 PM To: 'saag@ietf.org' Subject: NEA WG report The NEA WG met on Monday afternoon. We have two drafts with the IESG: draft-ietf-nea-pa-tnc-04.txt and draft-ietf-nea-pb-tnc-04.txt. We reviewed the comments received during IETF Last Call and from the ADs. Proposals for resolving these comments were presented and discussed. No substantial disputes came up so the editors will proceed with the changes discussed, as well as any others required to address IESG requests. Since the changes are not entirely trivial, we'll do another WGLC on the specs once they have been revised to make sure there is WG consensus on the changes. We also reviewed draft charter changes that add a new work item: specifying one or more Posture Transport protocols (PT) to transport the higher layer protocols (PA and PB). We do not plan to define a new transport protocol. Rather, we will define how the PB protocol should be carried over existing standard transport protocols like EAP and/or TLS. As with PA and PB, the plan is to solicit proposals for PT that meet our requirements (described in RFC 5209). There was agreement in the room and from our AD on these charter changes and they had already been favorably reviewed on the WG list so we will send them to the IESG for approval.