Subject: [Netconf] two-week review of drafts related to notifications and subscriptions

From: "Tim Jenkins (timjenki)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 13:54:37 +0000

Hi,

I have a network element based implementation of YANG Push (both periodic and on-change) and I support this draft moving to last call.

During last call, I would like to hear whether people want each configured receiver either (a) configured as specified now, or (b) configured in a top-level table of receivers so that there is one place to configure identical receivers. Both can work, but I like the top-level table solution as the extra configuration structure is easily justified by a simpler implementation.

Tim

--
Cisco Systems Canada Co.
2000 Innovation Drive
Kanata, ON, Canada, K2K 3E8
Preferences <http://www.cisco.com/offer/subscribe/?sid=000478326>
Unsubscribe <http://www.cisco.com/offer/unsubscribe/?sid=000478327>
Privacy <http://www.cisco.com/web/siteassets/legal/privacy.html>