Subject: Re: [netext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-ani-location-01.txt

From: Weixinpeng <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 01:40:28 +0000

Hi all,

I think this document is well written, and here are some of my comments:

(1) For Civic-Location Sub-Option:

I was wondering if that is easy to make the packet fragmented if RFC5139 defines civic-location in XML format (PIDF-LO) is used?

(2) If the LMA should check the validity of civic-location included in PBU to prevent MAG to send an incorrect location information, especially in case if PIDF-LO is used, and LMA's action regarding this should be specified?