From nsis-imp-bounces@lists.ietf.org Thu Feb 01 10:38:48 2007 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HCe1H-0002Xa-V9; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 10:38:39 -0500 Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HCe1H-0002X4-5Z; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 10:38:39 -0500 Received: from iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de ([141.3.10.81]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HCe1D-0000TN-HN; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 10:38:39 -0500 Received: from irams1.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de ([141.3.10.5]) by iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtps id 1HCe19-0000ax-OY; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 16:38:34 +0100 Received: from i72ms1.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de ([141.3.70.16] helo=smtp.ipv6.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de) by irams1.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtps id 1HCe19-0006bK-FM; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 16:38:31 +0100 Received: from vorta.ipv6.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de (i72vorta.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de [141.3.71.26]) by smtp.ipv6.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4EA667822; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 16:38:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by vorta.ipv6.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1HCe18-0007s0-7j; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 16:38:30 +0100 Message-ID: <45C20975.9080506@tm.uka.de> Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 16:38:29 +0100 From: Roland Bless Organization: Institute of Telematics, University of Karlsruhe User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Thunderbird/1.5 Mnenhy/0.7.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nsis-imp@ietf.org, NSIS Group Subject: Re: [NSIS] RE: [Nsis-imp] Next Interop References: <113091BD57179D4491C19DA7E10CD696983904@mx1.office> In-Reply-To: <113091BD57179D4491C19DA7E10CD696983904@mx1.office> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Report: -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: a7d6aff76b15f3f56fcb94490e1052e4 Cc: Martin Stiemerling X-BeenThere: nsis-imp@lists.ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: List for implementation questions for NSIS protocols List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: nsis-imp-bounces@lists.ietf.org Hi all, Martin Stiemerling wrote: > Thanks to Roland for organizing this. > > Before talking about the date of the interop, I would like to get a poll > on: > - How many implementations we still have > - How many implementators are willing to come this interop. Sorry for the very late mail, but I was quite busy with some other stuff. Feedback for participation was somehow confusing (e.g. different opinions about proposed dates from the same team, different preferences, etc.) and we have a circular dependency that participants can only commit to certain dates. Now, it's obvious too late to uphold the February meeting date. I would now propose to do it in *April* after easter somewhere in the weeks from * 16.4.--27.4.2007 *. This will also allow for better preparation of the test cases that we want to test. If I collect the answer from a previous poll, we have the following parties that expressed general interest in the next interop: * Univ. of Coimbra (pt): - GIST, QoS-NSLP, NAT/FW, HyPath * Univ. of Göttingen (de): - GIST, NAT/FW NSLP, QoS NSLP, ping/diagnostics * Siemens Roke Manor Research (UK) - GIST * Univ. of Karlsruhe (de): - GIST, QoS-NSLP, NAT/FW Anyone missing? Action item: Interested parties should state their preferences w.r.t the above date or suggestion an alternative. Best regards, Roland _______________________________________________ NSIS-imp mailing list NSIS-imp@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp From nsis-imp-bounces@lists.ietf.org Thu Feb 01 11:01:13 2007 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HCeN7-0001UA-Bt; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:01:13 -0500 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HCeN6-0001Ti-3c; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:01:12 -0500 Received: from smtp.dei.uc.pt ([193.137.203.228] helo=smtp2.dei.uc.pt) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HCeN0-0005J5-1O; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:01:12 -0500 Received: from [193.136.207.128] (dhcp-eucpii-128.ci.uc.pt [193.136.207.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp2.dei.uc.pt (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l11FqMnV021384 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:52:22 GMT Message-ID: <45C20CB0.90402@dei.uc.pt> Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:52:16 +0000 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lu=EDs_Cordeiro?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (Windows/20070116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland Bless Subject: Re: [NSIS] RE: [Nsis-imp] Next Interop References: <113091BD57179D4491C19DA7E10CD696983904@mx1.office> <45C20975.9080506@tm.uka.de> In-Reply-To: <45C20975.9080506@tm.uka.de> X-FCTUC-DEI-SIC-MailScanner-Information: Please contact helpdesk@dei.uc.pt for more information X-FCTUC-DEI-SIC-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-FCTUC-DEI-SIC-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-43.801, required 3, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 8.00, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, L_SMTP_AUTH -50.00, MIME_HTML_ONLY 0.00) X-FCTUC-DEI-SIC-MailScanner-From: cordeiro@dei.uc.pt X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Scan-Signature: 92df29fa99cf13e554b84c8374345c17 Cc: Martin Stiemerling , nsis-imp@ietf.org, NSIS Group X-BeenThere: nsis-imp@lists.ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: List for implementation questions for NSIS protocols List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0786444921==" Errors-To: nsis-imp-bounces@lists.ietf.org --===============0786444921== Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Roland,

My proposal is 16, 17 and 18 of April.

BR,
Luís Cordeiro

Roland Bless wrote: 
Hi all,

Martin Stiemerling wrote:
  
Thanks to Roland for organizing this. 

Before talking about the date of the interop, I would like to get a poll
on:
- How many implementations we still have
- How many implementators are willing to come this interop.
    

Sorry for the very late mail, but I was quite busy
with some other stuff. Feedback for participation was somehow
confusing (e.g. different opinions about proposed dates
from the same team, different preferences, etc.)
and we have a circular dependency that participants can only
commit to certain dates.

Now, it's obvious too late to uphold the February
meeting date. I would now propose to do it in *April* after easter
somewhere in the weeks from * 16.4.--27.4.2007 *. This will also
allow for better preparation of the test cases that we want to test.

If I collect the answer from a previous poll, we have the
following parties that expressed general interest in the
next interop:
* Univ. of Coimbra (pt):
  - GIST, QoS-NSLP, NAT/FW, HyPath
* Univ. of Göttingen (de):
  - GIST, NAT/FW NSLP, QoS NSLP, ping/diagnostics
* Siemens Roke Manor Research (UK)
  - GIST
* Univ. of Karlsruhe (de):
  - GIST, QoS-NSLP, NAT/FW

Anyone missing?

Action item: Interested parties should
state their preferences w.r.t the above date
or suggestion an alternative.

Best regards,
 Roland

_______________________________________________
NSIS-imp mailing list
NSIS-imp@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp
--===============0786444921== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ NSIS-imp mailing list NSIS-imp@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp --===============0786444921==-- From nsis-imp-bounces@lists.ietf.org Thu Feb 01 11:51:56 2007 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HCfAC-0002aW-Ng; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:51:56 -0500 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HCfAB-0002aR-G0 for nsis-imp@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:51:55 -0500 Received: from rsys002x.roke.co.uk ([193.118.201.109]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HCfA9-0000b9-1c for nsis-imp@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:51:55 -0500 Received: from rsys005a.comm.ad.roke.co.uk (rsys005a [193.118.193.85]) by rsys002x.roke.co.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l11GpggC002814; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 16:51:42 GMT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [NSIS] RE: [Nsis-imp] Next Interop Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 16:51:42 -0000 Message-ID: <2181C5F19DD0254692452BFF3EAF1D6802FE4E14@rsys005a.comm.ad.roke.co.uk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [NSIS] RE: [Nsis-imp] Next Interop Thread-Index: AcdGFyZ1oyPs0UWjTxmfyi7BJ4fgdQACY6ig References: <113091BD57179D4491C19DA7E10CD696983904@mx1.office> <45C20975.9080506@tm.uka.de> From: "Ford, Alan" To: "Roland Bless" , X-MailScanner-roke-co-uk: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-roke-co-uk-SpamCheck: X-MailScanner-From: alan.ford@roke.co.uk X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 52f7a77164458f8c7b36b66787c853da Cc: X-BeenThere: nsis-imp@lists.ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: List for implementation questions for NSIS protocols List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: nsis-imp-bounces@lists.ietf.org Hi Roland et al, We cannot say for sure whether we will be able to participate until much = nearer the time. However, if you can, please make it the second of these weeks (beginning = 23/4) - I know already that I will not be available to participate in = the first week. Regards, Alan -----Original Message----- From: Roland Bless [mailto:bless@tm.uka.de]=20 Sent: 01 February 2007 15:38 To: nsis-imp@ietf.org; NSIS Group Cc: Martin Stiemerling Subject: Re: [NSIS] RE: [Nsis-imp] Next Interop Hi all, Martin Stiemerling wrote: > Thanks to Roland for organizing this.=20 >=20 > Before talking about the date of the interop, I would like to get a=20 > poll > on: > - How many implementations we still have > - How many implementators are willing to come this interop. Sorry for the very late mail, but I was quite busy with some other = stuff. Feedback for participation was somehow confusing (e.g. different = opinions about proposed dates from the same team, different preferences, = etc.) and we have a circular dependency that participants can only = commit to certain dates. Now, it's obvious too late to uphold the February meeting date. I would = now propose to do it in *April* after easter somewhere in the weeks from = * 16.4.--27.4.2007 *. This will also allow for better preparation of the = test cases that we want to test. If I collect the answer from a previous poll, we have the following = parties that expressed general interest in the next interop: * Univ. of Coimbra (pt): - GIST, QoS-NSLP, NAT/FW, HyPath * Univ. of G=F6ttingen (de): - GIST, NAT/FW NSLP, QoS NSLP, ping/diagnostics * Siemens Roke Manor Research (UK) - GIST * Univ. of Karlsruhe (de): - GIST, QoS-NSLP, NAT/FW Anyone missing? Action item: Interested parties should state their preferences w.r.t the above date or suggestion an = alternative. Best regards, Roland _______________________________________________ NSIS-imp mailing list NSIS-imp@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp _______________________________________________ NSIS-imp mailing list NSIS-imp@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp