Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] a couple editorial comments on draft-ietf-oauth-v2-03

From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 22:13:52 -0700

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dick Hardt [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2010 7:11 PM
> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav
> Cc: OAuth WG ([email-masked])
> Subject: a couple editorial comments on draft-ietf-oauth-v2-03
> 
> Use of term "identifier" wrt. access token and refresh token. The Abstract,
> Introduction, 2.1 access token, refresh token, still refer to the access token
> as an identifier.

I agreed with you before and asked (repeatedly) for new text. Please suggest alternatives.

> 3.2.1
> Numerical number are included as JSON numbers.
> 
> should be
> 
> Numerical numbers are included as JSON numbers.

Actually:

Numerical values are included as JSON numbers.

But thanks for the catch :-)

EHL