From nobody Wed Jul 2 09:14:52 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ops-area@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ops-area@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E09F01A034B; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 09:14:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.152 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bHCebKvteKXm; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 09:14:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB9871A011D; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 09:14:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=250; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1404317689; x=1405527289; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject: content-transfer-encoding; bh=vDVhjxhPQX7FSNzVpInbxtwdDr/KPmmecucYcuy1TSI=; b=C6HZvshkln0sheT6NtB3Acbd2P+ybvF9XgBJptFJJKCM1ugGRq+X8E2/ YikpuTG9B+DwmU7Ux1HJ7A6zbZtsQU5ngdRRvW5A/xHLgch+HiKOjQBf1 EV8l7pohG1NI3gzpj/x+h71sJ89LZhuyigkz7OILKDFeKvJZBFulP9yxt 8=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmsIALIutFOtJssW/2dsb2JhbABakUueKgEBAQEBAQUBbgGbA3WEQkA9FhgDAgECAUsBDAgBAYg+xlkXhXCNfAEEmm2HDox8g0U7 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,589,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="103105981" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Jul 2014 16:14:46 +0000 Received: from [10.60.67.87] (ams-bclaise-8916.cisco.com [10.60.67.87]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s62GEjBe021161; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 16:14:46 GMT Message-ID: <53B42FF5.7000202@cisco.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 18:14:45 +0200 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "ops-area@ietf.org" , 90attendees@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-area/7Qoo3sJypWisQiiANLMQeozQNpE Subject: [OPS-AREA] OPS open hours office X-BeenThere: ops-area@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPS Area e-mail list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 16:14:50 -0000 Dear all, When: Monday 1520-1650 EDT Where: TBD Please come to talk to us on any WG or area items, about new proposals, or about any other IETF-related business. An advanced notification would be appreciated. Regards, Joel and Benoit From nobody Tue Jul 22 05:52:15 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ops-area@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ops-area@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E6A1A0AF6 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 05:52:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.502 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WSCPy-GkHpXr for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 05:52:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D714C1A0652 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 05:52:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=947; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1406033532; x=1407243132; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cWRbl8t2PBRz5pH92lKRpTeTYE+ZxADVIGHUOWdUoks=; b=ZY51jUy/jQQZnAMfhMih9EwVzH6UOH9Pnlts3H4mZmgOeDL+tpeHR2n+ sxVq7POZS87qOfEyX4IIruJhS4Ah/ak63wcF6h+cbsQuJkyqeHVmVJkeM TP0pLM9ShT3ky45yHe04Y0A597WtfBamFv28LO6o24z10owvuG/He+1ox E=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkkFAFJdzlOtJA2E/2dsb2JhbABYgw5SV8cNCodFAYEPFnaEBAEBBAEBARobNgQGEQshFg8JAwIBAgEVMAYNBgIBAQWIOQ2/OxePUoRGAQSbJocVjRqDYCEv X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,710,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="62978001" Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Jul 2014 12:52:12 +0000 Received: from [10.82.211.224] (rtp-vpn4-992.cisco.com [10.82.211.224]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6MCqBti022542 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:52:12 GMT Message-ID: <53CE5E7B.9090304@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:52:11 -0400 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "ops-area@ietf.org" References: <53AB0805.4010203@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <53AB0805.4010203@cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-area/tIA299zdIZhFTn2mQ9Z00bqHuKo Subject: Re: [OPS-AREA] call for agenda items for the OPSAREA open meeting at IETF-89 X-BeenThere: ops-area@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPS Area e-mail list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:52:14 -0000 Dear all, Here is the final OPSAREA agenda (combined with OPSAWG): http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/agenda/agenda-90-opsawg Regards, Benoit > Dear all, > > We are planning again for a joint OPSAWG and OPSAREA open meeting, > with the OPSAWG work items driving most of the agenda. The more > general cross-area items or those related to the relation between work > in the area and work out of the IETF should be part of the OPSAREA > section. > > Please send us your requests for presentation and discussion slots. > So far, the agenda contains: > 1. github as tool for the IETF > 2. Transport Independent OAM in Multi-Layer network Entity (TIME) > 3. Network Function Virtualisation Configuration (NFVCon) > > Thanks and Regards, > > Joel and Benoit > > _______________________________________________ > OPS-AREA mailing list > OPS-AREA@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area > From nobody Wed Jul 30 07:49:23 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ops-area@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ops-area@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25E81A0109 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 07:49:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.501 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9UD7Q6sXyc-w for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 07:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D51D1A00A7 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 07:49:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3961; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1406731759; x=1407941359; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to; bh=8gPTy6FxHdXSops1p1q77MB/BH9Lt520YUuQ8agk7vo=; b=jBRiE8ufC+z+G274nfIwV9+18r6iTprKEZ1VzjxArKfjtrdNpuTd6ZVw aXo+Q7BEqPfnpBjfiEUI00DX4+9EAhrsLuswmSrV1jC4RskgcYFi896ae HbdVN9JQfMrrJF23dMgoP4s7XPYPfFw7bZ6dO9E0v2DuKb+c/mkvvUrlw I=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtkEAEMF2VOtJssW/2dsb2JhbABXA4NgV8sNh0sBgSV3hAMBAQEEeA0CAg8MAQMBAgoWDwkDAgECAQkyAggGDQYCAQEFiDkNwEMXBI83ARcGC4Q5BZtkhx6NNYNLOy8B X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,764,1400025600"; d="scan'208,217";a="122765099" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2014 14:49:17 +0000 Received: from [10.60.67.90] (ams-bclaise-8919.cisco.com [10.60.67.90]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6UEnGuG009207 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:49:16 GMT Message-ID: <53D905EC.2060708@cisco.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:49:16 +0200 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "ops-area@ietf.org" References: <20140723043206.GB14747@elstar.local> In-Reply-To: <20140723043206.GB14747@elstar.local> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20140723043206.GB14747@elstar.local> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070009040803010004030909" Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-area/ch0Gumtbt8oqgf2Ut-Gg4-TNo_Q Subject: [OPS-AREA] Fwd: cops-pr and sppi to historic X-BeenThere: ops-area@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPS Area e-mail list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:49:20 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070009040803010004030909 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear OPS-AREA members, Does anyone oppose to reclassify COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic? Regards, Benoit -------- Original Message -------- Subject: cops-pr and sppi to historic Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 06:32:06 +0200 From: Juergen Schoenwaelder Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder To: Benoit Claise Benoit, I have posted draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-02 [1] and I like to request that you start the process described in [2] item 2. /js [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic/ [2] http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/designating-rfcs-as-historic.html -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 --------------070009040803010004030909 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear OPS-AREA members,

Does anyone oppose to reclassify COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic?

Regards, Benoit


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: cops-pr and sppi to historic
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 06:32:06 +0200
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> 


Benoit,

I have posted draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-02 [1] and I like
to request that you start the process described in [2] item 2.

/js

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic/
[2] http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/designating-rfcs-as-historic.html

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>


--------------070009040803010004030909--