From nobody Sun Apr 5 23:02:23 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119D51A034C; Sun, 5 Apr 2015 23:02:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, TVD_SPACE_RATIO=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KjQ9I0eZscy2; Sun, 5 Apr 2015 23:02:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1591A0282; Sun, 5 Apr 2015 23:02:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: , , "Warren Kumari" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.13.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150406060222.1615.58368.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2015 23:02:22 -0700 From: IETF Secretariat Archived-At: Subject: [OPSAWG] ID Tracker State Update Notice: X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 06:02:23 -0000 IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp/ From nobody Mon Apr 6 09:33:29 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 427C71A89EF; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 09:33:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MAK5mxcCcSKW; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 09:33:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F53D1A8912; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 09:33:26 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.13.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Sender: Message-ID: <20150406163326.19239.91019.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 09:33:26 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG] Last Call: (HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in USM for SNMP) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 16:33:27 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG (opsawg) to consider the following document: - 'HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in USM for SNMP' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2015-04-20. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This memo specifies new HMAC-SHA-2 authentication protocols for the User-based Security Model (USM) for SNMPv3 defined in RFC 3414. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. From nobody Mon Apr 6 09:33:36 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BB51A89A6; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 09:33:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4bzZa6pIr4OG; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 09:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7956C1A89A9; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 09:33:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: , , "Warren Kumari" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.13.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150406163326.19239.37150.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 09:33:26 -0700 From: IETF Secretariat Archived-At: Subject: [OPSAWG] ID Tracker State Update Notice: X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 16:33:29 -0000 Last call has been made for draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp and state has been changed to In Last Call ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp/ From nobody Fri Apr 10 10:08:43 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D2E1A8A59 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 10:08:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.978 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ir0BCP3zl0ln for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 10:08:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com (mail-wg0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A4A51A88BD for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 10:08:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wgsk9 with SMTP id k9so23888197wgs.3 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 10:08:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=pZxsmFH+ciqje5ZmiT9f+1QLC+eiC47wHaR+Hoy0Emw=; b=CK6sZhLM0wvZbvFMBDGfSksPdDaGSbWbEVRSWpkTdPIY+yjLTlUUcTybSklSloj1rh xzf/GPKy6QILdiisfqBdn243mGqmj4sGKrjTSHpIJGpGxw99Cz6NEDLNgHzIUkU+U94+ GalkBWVF2XZAAD3I7hAPBVSMIxvoY8k2aWlZ8ExoUbMXtcG0JBCQIC4VvLFNSZ+/LMrn OuouKKrTQbnJNz1Pt4CXAl09JwDXJAVya3OWbbB/opCFe5QqaQA5jujiVQ7tsgS7gufA X95N1iKN/cmlS6A9Po77D5wX3FpW26LoH0EOF1wdXSP+CwzX/ModC6h5CDT8Z2HYaJhA 2svw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnYxFKuso7zlaB0anqdvpbriLMCn8rnvqulHPFPbelXRvDjkLBuFmtgGip+Q2/vncMjg4Q+ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.210.171 with SMTP id mv11mr15760390wic.61.1428685719066; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 10:08:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.110.97 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 10:08:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:08:39 -0400 Message-ID: From: Warren Kumari To: "opsawg@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Archived-At: Subject: [OPSAWG] Another CAPWAP document X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 17:08:42 -0000 Hi all, Please take a look at "CAPWAP Control and Data Channel Separation for Multi-provider Scenario" (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp-00) This document was discussed somewhat at the face to face meeting in Dallas. We have discussed this document with our ADs and have decided that it is sufficiently different to the CAPWAP ALT Tunnel (which is with the IESG), and that ALT Tunnel is sufficiently fgar in the process that we will keep this document separate... So, please take a look at it, and provide initial feedback We will consider having a call for adoption if there is enough evidence of interest.... W -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf From nobody Sat Apr 11 10:36:04 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@virtual.ietf.org Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id A91B21B2AEC; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 06:07:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E71B1B2AEB for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 06:07:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.234 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.234 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ocS4IsqB56BM for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 06:07:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02C4D1B2AE9 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 06:07:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net ([193.180.251.45]:42076) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1Ygv8W-0003cv-OQ for draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@tools.ietf.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 06:07:49 -0700 X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f79a46d0000006b4-de-55291ca1ce9a Received: from ESESSHC009.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 62.E9.01716.1AC19255; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 15:07:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.236]) by ESESSHC009.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.45]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 15:07:45 +0200 From: Christer Holmberg To: "gen-art@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-05 Thread-Index: AdB0YG7imXzOINi3SuGZx0oB0oX6KA== Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 13:07:44 +0000 Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D793917@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.150] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D793917ESESSMB209erics_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrDLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje4iGc1QgzVr+S2+r+tntbj66jOL A5PHkiU/mTy+XP7MFsAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJVxZUcfa8Ef64qujU/YGhibTLsYOTkkBEwk Vr+/wAZhi0lcuLceyObiEBI4yijR+PQaC4SzhFFi8aF37F2MHBxsAhYS3f+0QRpEBDQl5q54 ywRiMwtUS8zesokdxBYWcJaY/nEfK0SNh8S3gxNZIGw9ia/3joHFWQRUJRbOvcoEMpJXwFei d5EUSJgR6Ibvp9ZAjRSXuPVkPhPEbQISS/acZ4awRSVePv7HCmErSazYfokRoj5fYueqHrAa XgFBiZMzn7BMYBSehWTULCRls5CUQcR1JBbs/sQGYWtLLFv4mhnGPnPgMROy+AJG9lWMosWp xcW56UbGeqlFmcnFxfl5enmpJZsYgdFzcMtv3R2Mq187HmIU4GBU4uFVaNAIFWJNLCuuzD3E KM3BoiTOa2d8KERIID2xJDU7NbUgtSi+qDQntfgQIxMHp1QDY+6z2awv5STLt6w8n1q+TO/1 i1uuN1tWptw8HM0w+5GXZqdK1KUjtwQMJi/7ef7bE3sRR/4M551h5rOsjvP//iX5zexuoOM9 V+OTdRcl1b3fTHrA9ybfLpj/rlWgnt07/2l5f7lTu1ofXC6RffU81+Mqp8WOaH4LrRtbGqp1 fK6uM4+Um8VVrMRSnJFoqMVcVJwIAD33Z+h/AgAA X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 193.180.251.45 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: christer.holmberg@ericsson.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) Resent-To: draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@ietf.org Resent-Message-Id: <20150411130753.02C4D1B2AE9@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 06:07:50 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: christer.holmberg@ericsson.com Archived-At: Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 10:36:03 -0700 Cc: "draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@tools.ietf.org" Subject: [OPSAWG] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-05 X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 13:07:55 -0000 --_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D793917ESESSMB209erics_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-AR= T, please see the FAQ at Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-05 Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date: 11 April 2015 IETF LC End Date: 20 April 2015 IETF Telechat Date: N/A Summary: The document is well written, and almost ready for publicat= ion. I do, however, have a couple of comments (see below). Major Issues: None Minor Issues: Q1_10-1: In the IANA Considerations section, IANA is requested to register = new values. However, it is not mentioned in which registry the new values w= ill be registered. Editorial nits: Q1_GENERAL-1: Regarding reference, sometimes you say "RFC XXXX= [RFCXXXX]", sometimes "RFC XXXX" and sometimes "[RFCXXXX]". I think you should be consistent, and e.g. use "RFC XXXX [RFCXXXX]" on firs= t occurrence, and then "RFC XXXX". In some cases "[RFCXXXX]" is ok, though, e.g. in section 9.4 where you say = "SNMP-USER-BASED-SM-MIB [RFC3414].". --_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D793917ESESSMB209erics_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am the assigned Gen-ART revie= wer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wi= ki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

 

Document:   &nbs= p;            &= nbsp;        draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-05

 

Reviewer:   &nbs= p;             =           Christer Holmbe= rg

 

Review Date:   &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;     11 April 2015

 

IETF LC End Date:  &n= bsp;          20 April 2015

 

IETF Telechat Date:  =        N/A

 

Summary:    &nbs= p;   The document is well written, and almost ready for publicati= on. I do, however, have a couple of comments (see below).   =       

 

Major Issues: None

 

Minor Issues:

 

Q1_10-1: In the IANA Considerat= ions section, IANA is requested to register new values. However, it is not = mentioned in which registry the new values will be registered.

 

 

 

Editorial nits:

 

Q1_GENERAL-1:   =            Regarding refe= rence, sometimes you say “RFC XXXX [RFCXXXX]”, sometimes “= ;RFC XXXX” and sometimes “[RFCXXXX]”.

 

I think you should be consisten= t, and e.g. use “RFC XXXX [RFCXXXX]” on first occurrence, and t= hen “RFC XXXX”.

 

In some cases “[RFCXXXX]&= #8221; is ok, though, e.g. in section 9.4 where you say “SNMP-= USER-BASED-SM-MIB [RFC3414].”. 

 

 

 

 

--_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D793917ESESSMB209erics_-- From nobody Mon Apr 13 01:29:29 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0942E1B2ECE for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 01:29:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.778 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.778 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LrfuHerWySLo for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 01:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 971BB1B2EC9 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 01:29:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BRI19337; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:29:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.32) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:28:21 +0100 Received: from NKGEML509-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.207]) by nkgeml401-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.32]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:28:16 +0800 From: Youjianjie To: Warren Kumari , "opsawg@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] Another CAPWAP document Thread-Index: AQHQc7EGuR4mLU/St0+xO6zsKAGCdZ1Km5wA Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:28:16 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.173] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: [OPSAWG] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogIEFub3RoZXIgQ0FQV0FQIGRvY3VtZW50?= X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:29:27 -0000 SGksDQoNClRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgc3VwcG9ydHMgdGhlIFdUUCBlc3RhYmxpc2hlcyBkYXRhIHR1 bm5lbHMgd2l0aCBkaWZmZXJlbnQgQWNjZXNzIFJvdXRlcnMgKEFScyksIHdoaWNoIG1heSBiZWxv bmcgdG8gZGlmZmVyZW50IFZpcnR1YWwgTmV0d29yayBPcGVyYXRvcnMgKFZOT3MpLg0KVGhlIHNs aWRlcyBhcmUgYXZhaWxhYmxlOiBodHRwczovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2FnZW5kYS85Mi9zbGlk ZXMvc2xpZGVzLTkyLW9wc2F3Zy00LnBkZg0KWW91ciBxdWVzdGlvbnMgYW5kIGNvbW1lbnRzIGFy ZSBhcHByZWNpYXRlZC4NCg0KVGhhbmtzLA0KSmlhbmppZQ0KDQo+IC0tLS0t08q8/tStvP4tLS0t LQ0KPiC3orz+yMs6IE9QU0FXRyBbbWFpbHRvOm9wc2F3Zy1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXSC0+rHt IFdhcnJlbiBLdW1hcmkNCj4gt6LLzcqxvOQ6IDIwMTXE6jTUwjExyNUgMTowOQ0KPiDK1bz+yMs6 IG9wc2F3Z0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KPiDW98ziOiBbT1BTQVdHXSBBbm90aGVyIENBUFdBUCBkb2N1bWVu dA0KPiANCj4gSGkgYWxsLA0KPiANCj4gUGxlYXNlIHRha2UgYSBsb29rIGF0ICJDQVBXQVAgQ29u dHJvbCBhbmQgRGF0YSBDaGFubmVsIFNlcGFyYXRpb24gZm9yDQo+IE11bHRpLXByb3ZpZGVyIFNj ZW5hcmlvIg0KPiAoaHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LXlvdS1vcHNhd2ct Y2Fwd2FwLXNlcGFyYXRpb24tZm9yLW1wLTAwKQ0KPiANCj4gVGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCB3YXMgZGlz Y3Vzc2VkIHNvbWV3aGF0IGF0IHRoZSBmYWNlIHRvIGZhY2UgbWVldGluZyBpbiBEYWxsYXMuDQo+ IFdlIGhhdmUgZGlzY3Vzc2VkIHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgd2l0aCBvdXIgQURzIGFuZCBoYXZlIGRl Y2lkZWQgdGhhdCBpdCBpcw0KPiBzdWZmaWNpZW50bHkgZGlmZmVyZW50IHRvIHRoZSBDQVBXQVAg QUxUIFR1bm5lbCAod2hpY2ggaXMgd2l0aCB0aGUgSUVTRyksIGFuZA0KPiB0aGF0IEFMVCBUdW5u ZWwgaXMgc3VmZmljaWVudGx5IGZnYXIgaW4gdGhlIHByb2Nlc3MgdGhhdCB3ZSB3aWxsIGtlZXAg dGhpcw0KPiBkb2N1bWVudCBzZXBhcmF0ZS4uLg0KPiANCj4gU28sIHBsZWFzZSB0YWtlIGEgbG9v ayBhdCBpdCwgYW5kIHByb3ZpZGUgaW5pdGlhbCBmZWVkYmFjayBXZSB3aWxsIGNvbnNpZGVyIGhh dmluZw0KPiBhIGNhbGwgZm9yIGFkb3B0aW9uIGlmIHRoZXJlIGlzIGVub3VnaCBldmlkZW5jZSBv ZiBpbnRlcmVzdC4uLi4NCj4gDQo+IFcNCj4gLS0NCj4gSSBkb24ndCB0aGluayB0aGUgZXhlY3V0 aW9uIGlzIHJlbGV2YW50IHdoZW4gaXQgd2FzIG9idmlvdXNseSBhIGJhZCBpZGVhIGluIHRoZQ0K PiBmaXJzdCBwbGFjZS4NCj4gVGhpcyBpcyBsaWtlIHB1dHRpbmcgcmFiaWQgd2Vhc2VscyBpbiB5 b3VyIHBhbnRzLCBhbmQgbGF0ZXIgZXhwcmVzc2luZyByZWdyZXQgYXQNCj4gaGF2aW5nIGNob3Nl biB0aG9zZSBwYXJ0aWN1bGFyIHJhYmlkIHdlYXNlbHMgYW5kIHRoYXQgcGFpciBvZiBwYW50cy4N Cj4gICAgLS0tbWFmDQo+IA0KPiBfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fXw0KPiBPUFNBV0cgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQo+IE9QU0FXR0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KPiBo dHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL29wc2F3Zw0K From nobody Mon Apr 13 13:44:45 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE6D1A6FFA for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:44:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -8.222 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.222 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M6crI-r9LZzV for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:44:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DAB91A6FF1 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:44:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3282; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1428957880; x=1430167480; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=vseC5G0b+BwZuU+cyZv3R7jPrrVkF9MT0I4/V6RVib4=; b=lTvbEIaXdiV7CZbEvV87MvJzb5By5vbyPpS6IVZ4wF2K0ixpuYaqCtVj PMarz+IqjfoaUT6B5KUGHrBc+XEcWH1D14tySYNl67/b9E66w2AXeJxso Mdfhnr0n3cBW2RKfcy0d6+f9UdErY24rMP5WTahoswS7YdIT5qtG7jBam Y=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DKBACsKSxV/51dJa1cgwxSXAWDEMEYZgmBRAyFMU4CHIEhOBQBAQEBAQEBfYQgAQECAgEBARoXOhsCAQYCHCMFAgIlCxQGCwIEARKIKQENmgScfAiWGwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFASBHYoOhGEigmSBSQEEkQyDeYYWgR2DN4xLg00ig29vAYFDfwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,572,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="140883123" Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Apr 2015 20:44:39 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com [173.37.183.86]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3DKidpG001084 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 13 Apr 2015 20:44:39 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.4.196]) by xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com ([173.37.183.86]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:44:39 -0500 From: "Rajesh Pazhyannur (rpazhyan)" To: Youjianjie , Warren Kumari , "opsawg@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: =?gb2312?B?W09QU0FXR10gtPC4tDogIEFub3RoZXIgQ0FQV0FQIGRvY3VtZW50?= Thread-Index: AQHQdcP6pXnMY4Kxk0m/o5OcMPgKYp1LSEEA Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 20:44:38 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.6.141106 x-originating-ip: [171.70.232.30] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-ID: <1E3193830C532A4DA13C41328FE91BAF@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogIEFub3RoZXIgQ0FQV0FQIGRvY3VtZW50?= X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 20:44:42 -0000 SGVsbG+hrQ0KDQpDYW4gdGhlIGF1dGhvcnMgZXhwbGFpbiB3aHkgdGhlIHByb2JsZW0gc3RhdGVt ZW50IGZvciB0aGlzIGNhbm5vdCBiZQ0KYWRkcmVzc2VkIHdpdGhpbiB0aGUgZnJhbWV3b3JrIG9m IHRoZQ0KIkFsdGVybmF0ZSBUdW5uZWwgRW5jYXBzdWxhdGlvbiBmb3IgRGF0YSBGcmFtZXMgaW4g Q0FQV0FQobEuIFNwZWNpZmljYWxseSwNCndoYXQgYXJlIHRoZSBnYXBzID8NCg0KVGhlIGFsdGVy bmF0ZSB0dW5uZWwgZHJhZnQgZG9lcyBhbGxvdyBmb3IgZGlmZmVyZW50IEFSIHRvIGJlIHNwZWNp ZmllZCBmb3INCmRpZmZlcmVudCBXTEFOcy4NCk9uZSBnYXAgaXMgd2hldGhlciBzdWNoIGNhcGFi aWxpdHkgKHN1cHBvcnRpbmcgb25lIGFsdGVybmF0ZSB0dW5uZWwgdmVyc3VzDQptdWx0aXBsZSBh bHRlcm5hdGUgdHVubmVscykgbmVlZHMgdG8gYmUgbmVnb3RpYXRlZCBvciBub3QgPw0KDQoNClJl Z2FyZHMNCg0KUmFqZXNoDQoNCk9uIDQvMTMvMTUsIDE6MjggQU0sICJZb3VqaWFuamllIiA8eW91 amlhbmppZUBodWF3ZWkuY29tPiB3cm90ZToNCg0KPkhpLA0KPg0KPlRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgc3Vw cG9ydHMgdGhlIFdUUCBlc3RhYmxpc2hlcyBkYXRhIHR1bm5lbHMgd2l0aCBkaWZmZXJlbnQNCj5B Y2Nlc3MgUm91dGVycyAoQVJzKSwgd2hpY2ggbWF5IGJlbG9uZyB0byBkaWZmZXJlbnQgVmlydHVh bCBOZXR3b3JrDQo+T3BlcmF0b3JzIChWTk9zKS4NCj5UaGUgc2xpZGVzIGFyZSBhdmFpbGFibGU6 DQo+aHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9hZ2VuZGEvOTIvc2xpZGVzL3NsaWRlcy05Mi1vcHNh d2ctNC5wZGYNCj5Zb3VyIHF1ZXN0aW9ucyBhbmQgY29tbWVudHMgYXJlIGFwcHJlY2lhdGVkLg0K Pg0KPlRoYW5rcywNCj5KaWFuamllDQo+DQo+PiAtLS0tLdPKvP7Urbz+LS0tLS0NCj4+ILeivP7I yzogT1BTQVdHIFttYWlsdG86b3BzYXdnLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmddILT6se0gV2FycmVuIEt1 bWFyaQ0KPj4gt6LLzcqxvOQ6IDIwMTXE6jTUwjExyNUgMTowOQ0KPj4gytW8/sjLOiBvcHNhd2dA aWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4+INb3zOI6IFtPUFNBV0ddIEFub3RoZXIgQ0FQV0FQIGRvY3VtZW50DQo+PiAN Cj4+IEhpIGFsbCwNCj4+IA0KPj4gUGxlYXNlIHRha2UgYSBsb29rIGF0ICJDQVBXQVAgQ29udHJv bCBhbmQgRGF0YSBDaGFubmVsIFNlcGFyYXRpb24gZm9yDQo+PiBNdWx0aS1wcm92aWRlciBTY2Vu YXJpbyINCj4+IA0KPj4oaHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LXlvdS1vcHNh d2ctY2Fwd2FwLXNlcGFyYXRpb24tZm9yLW1wLTAwDQo+PikNCj4+IA0KPj4gVGhpcyBkb2N1bWVu dCB3YXMgZGlzY3Vzc2VkIHNvbWV3aGF0IGF0IHRoZSBmYWNlIHRvIGZhY2UgbWVldGluZyBpbg0K Pj5EYWxsYXMuDQo+PiBXZSBoYXZlIGRpc2N1c3NlZCB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IHdpdGggb3VyIEFE cyBhbmQgaGF2ZSBkZWNpZGVkIHRoYXQgaXQgaXMNCj4+IHN1ZmZpY2llbnRseSBkaWZmZXJlbnQg dG8gdGhlIENBUFdBUCBBTFQgVHVubmVsICh3aGljaCBpcyB3aXRoIHRoZQ0KPj5JRVNHKSwgYW5k DQo+PiB0aGF0IEFMVCBUdW5uZWwgaXMgc3VmZmljaWVudGx5IGZnYXIgaW4gdGhlIHByb2Nlc3Mg dGhhdCB3ZSB3aWxsIGtlZXANCj4+dGhpcw0KPj4gZG9jdW1lbnQgc2VwYXJhdGUuLi4NCj4+IA0K Pj4gU28sIHBsZWFzZSB0YWtlIGEgbG9vayBhdCBpdCwgYW5kIHByb3ZpZGUgaW5pdGlhbCBmZWVk YmFjayBXZSB3aWxsDQo+PmNvbnNpZGVyIGhhdmluZw0KPj4gYSBjYWxsIGZvciBhZG9wdGlvbiBp ZiB0aGVyZSBpcyBlbm91Z2ggZXZpZGVuY2Ugb2YgaW50ZXJlc3QuLi4uDQo+PiANCj4+IFcNCj4+ IC0tDQo+PiBJIGRvbid0IHRoaW5rIHRoZSBleGVjdXRpb24gaXMgcmVsZXZhbnQgd2hlbiBpdCB3 YXMgb2J2aW91c2x5IGEgYmFkDQo+PmlkZWEgaW4gdGhlDQo+PiBmaXJzdCBwbGFjZS4NCj4+IFRo aXMgaXMgbGlrZSBwdXR0aW5nIHJhYmlkIHdlYXNlbHMgaW4geW91ciBwYW50cywgYW5kIGxhdGVy IGV4cHJlc3NpbmcNCj4+cmVncmV0IGF0DQo+PiBoYXZpbmcgY2hvc2VuIHRob3NlIHBhcnRpY3Vs YXIgcmFiaWQgd2Vhc2VscyBhbmQgdGhhdCBwYWlyIG9mIHBhbnRzLg0KPj4gICAgLS0tbWFmDQo+ PiANCj4+IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQo+ PiBPUFNBV0cgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQo+PiBPUFNBV0dAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4+IGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3 LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vb3BzYXdnDQo+X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj5PUFNBV0cgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQo+T1BTQVdH QGlldGYub3JnDQo+aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9vcHNhd2cN Cg0K From nobody Mon Apr 13 20:05:39 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31BC41B31F1 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 20:05:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.078 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.078 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O_BTWKe58prC for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 20:05:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99E0D1B31E7 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 20:05:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BUU72341; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 03:05:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.39) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 04:05:33 +0100 Received: from NKGEML509-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.207]) by nkgeml408-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.39]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:05:26 +0800 From: Youjianjie To: "Rajesh Pazhyannur (rpazhyan)" , Warren Kumari , "opsawg@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: =?gb2312?B?W09QU0FXR10gtPC4tDogIEFub3RoZXIgQ0FQV0FQIGRvY3VtZW50?= Thread-Index: AQHQdiqtAlPKEt4I4kq02TqHl2+GXJ1LuTcA Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 03:05:26 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.173] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: [OPSAWG] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogILTwuLQ6ICBBbm90aGVyIENBUFdBUCBkb2N1?= =?gb2312?b?bWVudA==?= X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 03:05:38 -0000 SGkgUmFqZXNoLA0KDQpUaGFua3MgZm9yIHRoZSBxdWVzdGlvbnMhDQoNCltkcmFmdC1pZXRmLW9w c2F3Zy1jYXB3YXAtYWx0LXR1bm5lbC0wNF0gZGVzY3JpYmVzOiAidGhlIEFDIHByb3ZpZGVzIHRo ZSBhbHRlcm5hdGUgdHVubmVsIGVuY2Fwc3VsYXRpb24gbWVzc2FnZSBlbGVtZW50IGNvbnRhaW5p bmcgdGhlIHR1bm5lbCB0eXBlIGFuZCBhIHR1bm5lbC1zcGVjaWZpYyBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBlbGVt ZW50IHdoaWxlIGNvbmZpZ3VyaW5nIHRoZSBXVFAuIg0KRnJvbSB0aGUgZm9ybWF0IG9mIEFsdGVy bmF0ZSBUdW5uZWwgRW5jYXBzdWxhdGlvbnMgVHlwZSAoRmlndXJlIDYpLCBpdCBzZWVtcyBvbmx5 IG9uZSB0dW5uZWwgaXMgc3BlY2lmaWVkIGJldHdlZW4gdGhlIFdUUCBhbmQgQVIuDQoNCltkcmFm dC15b3Utb3BzYXdnLWNhcHdhcC1zZXBhcmF0aW9uLWZvci1tcC0wMF0gZm9jdXNlcyBvbiB0aGUg bXVsdGktVk5PcyBzY2VuYXJpby4gV2hlbiB0aGUgV1RQIGpvaW5zIHRoZSBBQywgaWYgdGhlIFdU UCBzZXJ2aWNlcyBtdWx0aS1WTk9zIChpLmUuIGRpZmZlcmVudCBTU0lEIGZvciBkaWZmZXJlbnQg Vk5PLCBhbmQgdXNlciBkYXRhIGNhbiBiZSBkaXJlY3RseSBzdGVlcmVkIHRvIGl0cyBjb3JyZXNw b25kaW5nIFZOTyBkb21haW4gdmlhIHRoZSBXVFAgYW5kIEFSIHR1bm5lbCksIHRoZW4gdGhlIEFD IHNob3VsZCBwcm92aWRlIHRoZSBXVFAgd2l0aCBtdWx0aXBsZSB0dW5uZWwgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24g KGUuZy4gU1NJRCwgQVIgYWRkcmVzcyBmb3IgZWFjaCB0dW5uZWwpLiBBY3R1YWxseSB0aGlzIGRy YWZ0IGlzIG5vdCBib3VuZCB3aXRoIHR1bm5lbCBlbmNhcHN1bGF0aW9uIG5lZ290aWF0aW9uIHBy b3Bvc2VkIGluIFtkcmFmdC1pZXRmLW9wc2F3Zy1jYXB3YXAtYWx0LXR1bm5lbC0wNF0uIFRoZXNl IHR3byBkcmFmdHMgY2FuIGJlIGNvbXBsZW1lbnRhcnkuDQoNClNvIEkgdGhpbmsgdGhlIG1haW4g Z2FwIGlzIGR1cmluZyB0aGUgV1RQIGNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24sIHdoYXQga2luZCBvZiBpbmZvcm1h dGlvbiBBQyBzaGFsbCBwcm92aWRlPyBBbHRlcm5hdGUgVHVubmVsIEVuY2Fwc3VsYXRpb25zPyBt dWx0aXBsZSB0dW5uZWwgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gZm9yIGRpZmZlcmVudCBWTk9zPyBJIHRoaW5rIHRo aXMgZGVwZW5kcyBvbiB0aGUgc3BlY2lmaWMgc2NlbmFyaW9zLg0KDQpUaGFua3MsDQpKaWFuamll DQoNCg0KPiAtLS0tLdPKvP7Urbz+LS0tLS0NCj4gt6K8/sjLOiBSYWplc2ggUGF6aHlhbm51ciAo cnBhemh5YW4pIFttYWlsdG86cnBhemh5YW5AY2lzY28uY29tXQ0KPiC3osvNyrG85DogMjAxNcTq NNTCMTTI1SA0OjQ1DQo+IMrVvP7IyzogWW91amlhbmppZTsgV2FycmVuIEt1bWFyaTsgb3BzYXdn QGlldGYub3JnDQo+INb3zOI6IFJlOiBbT1BTQVdHXSC08Li0OiBBbm90aGVyIENBUFdBUCBkb2N1 bWVudA0KPiANCj4gSGVsbG+hrQ0KPiANCj4gQ2FuIHRoZSBhdXRob3JzIGV4cGxhaW4gd2h5IHRo ZSBwcm9ibGVtIHN0YXRlbWVudCBmb3IgdGhpcyBjYW5ub3QgYmUNCj4gYWRkcmVzc2VkIHdpdGhp biB0aGUgZnJhbWV3b3JrIG9mIHRoZSAiQWx0ZXJuYXRlIFR1bm5lbCBFbmNhcHN1bGF0aW9uIGZv cg0KPiBEYXRhIEZyYW1lcyBpbiBDQVBXQVChsS4gU3BlY2lmaWNhbGx5LCB3aGF0IGFyZSB0aGUg Z2FwcyA/DQo+IA0KPiBUaGUgYWx0ZXJuYXRlIHR1bm5lbCBkcmFmdCBkb2VzIGFsbG93IGZvciBk aWZmZXJlbnQgQVIgdG8gYmUgc3BlY2lmaWVkIGZvcg0KPiBkaWZmZXJlbnQgV0xBTnMuDQo+IE9u ZSBnYXAgaXMgd2hldGhlciBzdWNoIGNhcGFiaWxpdHkgKHN1cHBvcnRpbmcgb25lIGFsdGVybmF0 ZSB0dW5uZWwgdmVyc3VzDQo+IG11bHRpcGxlIGFsdGVybmF0ZSB0dW5uZWxzKSBuZWVkcyB0byBi ZSBuZWdvdGlhdGVkIG9yIG5vdCA/DQo+IA0KPiANCj4gUmVnYXJkcw0KPiANCj4gUmFqZXNoDQo+ IA0KPiBPbiA0LzEzLzE1LCAxOjI4IEFNLCAiWW91amlhbmppZSIgPHlvdWppYW5qaWVAaHVhd2Vp LmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6DQo+IA0KPiA+SGksDQo+ID4NCj4gPlRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgc3VwcG9ydHMg dGhlIFdUUCBlc3RhYmxpc2hlcyBkYXRhIHR1bm5lbHMgd2l0aCBkaWZmZXJlbnQNCj4gPkFjY2Vz cyBSb3V0ZXJzIChBUnMpLCB3aGljaCBtYXkgYmVsb25nIHRvIGRpZmZlcmVudCBWaXJ0dWFsIE5l dHdvcmsNCj4gPk9wZXJhdG9ycyAoVk5PcykuDQo+ID5UaGUgc2xpZGVzIGFyZSBhdmFpbGFibGU6 DQo+ID5odHRwczovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2FnZW5kYS85Mi9zbGlkZXMvc2xpZGVzLTkyLW9w c2F3Zy00LnBkZg0KPiA+WW91ciBxdWVzdGlvbnMgYW5kIGNvbW1lbnRzIGFyZSBhcHByZWNpYXRl ZC4NCj4gPg0KPiA+VGhhbmtzLA0KPiA+SmlhbmppZQ0KPiA+DQo+ID4+IC0tLS0t08q8/tStvP4t LS0tLQ0KPiA+PiC3orz+yMs6IE9QU0FXRyBbbWFpbHRvOm9wc2F3Zy1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3Jn XSC0+rHtIFdhcnJlbiBLdW1hcmkNCj4gPj4gt6LLzcqxvOQ6IDIwMTXE6jTUwjExyNUgMTowOQ0K PiA+PiDK1bz+yMs6IG9wc2F3Z0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KPiA+PiDW98ziOiBbT1BTQVdHXSBBbm90aGVy IENBUFdBUCBkb2N1bWVudA0KPiA+Pg0KPiA+PiBIaSBhbGwsDQo+ID4+DQo+ID4+IFBsZWFzZSB0 YWtlIGEgbG9vayBhdCAiQ0FQV0FQIENvbnRyb2wgYW5kIERhdGEgQ2hhbm5lbCBTZXBhcmF0aW9u IGZvcg0KPiA+PiBNdWx0aS1wcm92aWRlciBTY2VuYXJpbyINCj4gPj4NCj4gPj4oaHR0cHM6Ly90 b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LXlvdS1vcHNhd2ctY2Fwd2FwLXNlcGFyYXRpb24tZm9y LW1wDQo+ID4+LTAwDQo+ID4+KQ0KPiA+Pg0KPiA+PiBUaGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IHdhcyBkaXNjdXNz ZWQgc29tZXdoYXQgYXQgdGhlIGZhY2UgdG8gZmFjZSBtZWV0aW5nIGluDQo+ID4+RGFsbGFzLg0K PiA+PiBXZSBoYXZlIGRpc2N1c3NlZCB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IHdpdGggb3VyIEFEcyBhbmQgaGF2 ZSBkZWNpZGVkIHRoYXQgaXQNCj4gPj5pcyAgc3VmZmljaWVudGx5IGRpZmZlcmVudCB0byB0aGUg Q0FQV0FQIEFMVCBUdW5uZWwgKHdoaWNoIGlzIHdpdGggdGhlDQo+ID4+SUVTRyksIGFuZCAgdGhh dCBBTFQgVHVubmVsIGlzIHN1ZmZpY2llbnRseSBmZ2FyIGluIHRoZSBwcm9jZXNzIHRoYXQNCj4g Pj53ZSB3aWxsIGtlZXAgdGhpcyAgZG9jdW1lbnQgc2VwYXJhdGUuLi4NCj4gPj4NCj4gPj4gU28s IHBsZWFzZSB0YWtlIGEgbG9vayBhdCBpdCwgYW5kIHByb3ZpZGUgaW5pdGlhbCBmZWVkYmFjayBX ZSB3aWxsDQo+ID4+Y29uc2lkZXIgaGF2aW5nICBhIGNhbGwgZm9yIGFkb3B0aW9uIGlmIHRoZXJl IGlzIGVub3VnaCBldmlkZW5jZSBvZg0KPiA+PmludGVyZXN0Li4uLg0KPiA+Pg0KPiA+PiBXDQo+ ID4+IC0tDQo+ID4+IEkgZG9uJ3QgdGhpbmsgdGhlIGV4ZWN1dGlvbiBpcyByZWxldmFudCB3aGVu IGl0IHdhcyBvYnZpb3VzbHkgYSBiYWQNCj4gPj5pZGVhIGluIHRoZSAgZmlyc3QgcGxhY2UuDQo+ ID4+IFRoaXMgaXMgbGlrZSBwdXR0aW5nIHJhYmlkIHdlYXNlbHMgaW4geW91ciBwYW50cywgYW5k IGxhdGVyDQo+ID4+ZXhwcmVzc2luZyByZWdyZXQgYXQgIGhhdmluZyBjaG9zZW4gdGhvc2UgcGFy dGljdWxhciByYWJpZCB3ZWFzZWxzIGFuZA0KPiA+PnRoYXQgcGFpciBvZiBwYW50cy4NCj4gPj4g ICAgLS0tbWFmDQo+ID4+DQo+ID4+IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fDQo+ID4+IE9QU0FXRyBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCj4gPj4gT1BTQVdHQGlldGYu b3JnDQo+ID4+IGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vb3BzYXdnDQo+ ID5fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KPiA+T1BT QVdHIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KPiA+T1BTQVdHQGlldGYub3JnDQo+ID5odHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRm Lm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL29wc2F3Zw0KDQo= From nobody Tue Apr 14 03:40:40 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A525C1A887D; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 03:40:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bMYDsyT8aDEW; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 03:40:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am1on0749.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe00::749]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C3C81A886D; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 03:40:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc6 (81.151.162.168) by DB3PR07MB060.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.137.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.130.23; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:38:42 +0000 Message-ID: <020c01d0769f$0076aec0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> From: t.petch To: Christer Holmberg , References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D793917@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:36:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Originating-IP: [81.151.162.168] X-ClientProxiedBy: DB3PR08CA0041.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (25.161.51.179) To DB3PR07MB060.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.137.151) Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ietfc@btconnect.com; X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB3PR07MB060; X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: BMV:1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(13464003)(377454003)(15975445007)(50226001)(47776003)(62966003)(77156002)(40100003)(61296003)(1456003)(4001410100001)(42186005)(230783001)(122386002)(77096005)(33646002)(50466002)(86362001)(87976001)(1556002)(46102003)(92566002)(62236002)(44716002)(66066001)(23756003)(14496001)(116806002)(81816999)(44736004)(19580405001)(19580395003)(84392001)(81686999)(76176999)(50986999)(74416001)(7726001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB3PR07MB060; H:pc6; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:nov; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(5002010); SRVR:DB3PR07MB060; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB3PR07MB060; X-Forefront-PRVS: 054642504A Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: btconnect.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Apr 2015 10:38:42.8583 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB3PR07MB060 Archived-At: Cc: opsawg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-05 X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:40:38 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christer Holmberg" To: Cc: Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2015 2:07 PM I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-05 Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date: 11 April 2015 IETF LC End Date: 20 April 2015 IETF Telechat Date: N/A Summary: The document is well written, and almost ready for publication. I do, however, have a couple of comments (see below). Major Issues: None Minor Issues: Q1_10-1: In the IANA Considerations section, IANA is requested to register new values. However, it is not mentioned in which registry the new values will be registered. Christer You puzzle me. When I look in the I-D I see "IANA is requested to assign a value in the SnmpAuthProtocols registry " which looks to me like a mention of which registry the new values will be registered in. Tom Petch Editorial nits: Q1_GENERAL-1: Regarding reference, sometimes you say "RFC XXXX [RFCXXXX]", sometimes "RFC XXXX" and sometimes "[RFCXXXX]". I think you should be consistent, and e.g. use "RFC XXXX [RFCXXXX]" on first occurrence, and then "RFC XXXX". In some cases "[RFCXXXX]" is ok, though, e.g. in section 9.4 where you say "SNMP-USER-BASED-SM-MIB [RFC3414].". ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > OPSAWG@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > From nobody Tue Apr 14 04:09:57 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670E31A890E; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 04:08:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sovWOijtXAps; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 04:08:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 888111A88FE; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 04:08:12 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f79a46d0000006b4-41-552cf51aa0b0 Received: from ESESSHC001.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 8A.E8.01716.A15FC255; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:08:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.236]) by ESESSHC001.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.21]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:08:09 +0200 From: Christer Holmberg To: t.petch , "gen-art@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-05 Thread-Index: AdB0YG7imXzOINi3SuGZx0oB0oX6KACPr/JeAAD7sWA= Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:08:09 +0000 Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D7986AF@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D793917@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <020c01d0769f$0076aec0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> In-Reply-To: <020c01d0769f$0076aec0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.19] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrHLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvja7UV51Qg0tXjC2+r+tntbj66jOL xbVH91ksVpzczOTA4rHr6A92jyVLfjJ5fLn8mS2AOYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoErY8KhzawFS1gq 1vxtYWlgXM7cxcjJISFgItFzYh8jhC0mceHeerYuRi4OIYGjjBI/1rxhgnCWMEq8PvYTqIOD g03AQqL7nzZIg4iAh8Txv/PBapgFFjFKvH+9HmyqsECQxLS3u5ghioIlrn7pYIWwrSS2/L3N DmKzCKhKHO6ZCbaZV8BX4vKHaYwQy5oYJdbsPANWxClgL7H+dCuYzQh03vdTa5hAbGYBcYlb T+YzQZwtILFkz3mod0QlXj7+xwphK0q0P21ghKjXkViw+xMbhK0tsWzha2aIxYISJ2c+YZnA KDYLydhZSFpmIWmZhaRlASPLKkbR4tTi4tx0I2O91KLM5OLi/Dy9vNSSTYzACDu45bfuDsbV rx0PMQpwMCrx8C4o0QkVYk0sK67MPcQozcGiJM5rZ3woREggPbEkNTs1tSC1KL6oNCe1+BAj EwenVANjy/LWufZKvybPippmEXA61GPiskvpFSctM3J+rLNZLfvf9DdTzIfL09lKgowuNPtX Bjea/DL9tD2tN/CtZUQRYwr7Ts/8ZW/uzNrllz554+FFz/4Vsnws3nLOlJ3NpHj96/qQ+Q1v hT7LMlhVTlaUsM5Z3SaSGnb3leCze/Z7reZeznL7I16txFKckWioxVxUnAgA/5bC5ZECAAA= Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 04:09:54 -0700 Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-05 X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:08:17 -0000 Hi Tom, >> Q1_10-1: In the IANA Considerations section, IANA is requested to regist= er new values. However, it is not mentioned in which registry the new value= s will be registered. > > > >Christer > >You puzzle me. When I look in the I-D I see > >"IANA is requested to assign a value in the SnmpAuthProtocols registry " > >which looks to me like a mention of which registry the new values will be = registered in. You are right, I missed that. Sorry for the confusion. I withdraw the comme= nt. Regards, Christer From nobody Tue Apr 14 04:09:58 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@virtual.ietf.org Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id BC78A1A890E; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 04:08:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBAC1A8908 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 04:08:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.235 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z4hr85OmnSkX for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 04:08:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12F7D1A890C for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 04:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net ([193.180.251.45]:46816) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YhyhT-0007Uh-1Y for draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@tools.ietf.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 04:08:15 -0700 X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f79a46d0000006b4-41-552cf51aa0b0 Received: from ESESSHC001.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 8A.E8.01716.A15FC255; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:08:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.236]) by ESESSHC001.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.21]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:08:09 +0200 From: Christer Holmberg To: t.petch , "gen-art@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-05 Thread-Index: AdB0YG7imXzOINi3SuGZx0oB0oX6KACPr/JeAAD7sWA= Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:08:09 +0000 Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D7986AF@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D793917@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <020c01d0769f$0076aec0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> In-Reply-To: <020c01d0769f$0076aec0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.19] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrHLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvja7UV51Qg0tXjC2+r+tntbj66jOL xbVH91ksVpzczOTA4rHr6A92jyVLfjJ5fLn8mS2AOYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoErY8KhzawFS1gq 1vxtYWlgXM7cxcjJISFgItFzYh8jhC0mceHeerYuRi4OIYGjjBI/1rxhgnCWMEq8PvYTqIOD g03AQqL7nzZIg4iAh8Txv/PBapgFFjFKvH+9HmyqsECQxLS3u5ghioIlrn7pYIWwrSS2/L3N DmKzCKhKHO6ZCbaZV8BX4vKHaYwQy5oYJdbsPANWxClgL7H+dCuYzQh03vdTa5hAbGYBcYlb T+YzQZwtILFkz3mod0QlXj7+xwphK0q0P21ghKjXkViw+xMbhK0tsWzha2aIxYISJ2c+YZnA KDYLydhZSFpmIWmZhaRlASPLKkbR4tTi4tx0I2O91KLM5OLi/Dy9vNSSTYzACDu45bfuDsbV rx0PMQpwMCrx8C4o0QkVYk0sK67MPcQozcGiJM5rZ3woREggPbEkNTs1tSC1KL6oNCe1+BAj EwenVANjy/LWufZKvybPippmEXA61GPiskvpFSctM3J+rLNZLfvf9DdTzIfL09lKgowuNPtX Bjea/DL9tD2tN/CtZUQRYwr7Ts/8ZW/uzNrllz554+FFz/4Vsnws3nLOlJ3NpHj96/qQ+Q1v hT7LMlhVTlaUsM5Z3SaSGnb3leCze/Z7reZeznL7I16txFKckWioxVxUnAgA/5bC5ZECAAA= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 193.180.251.45 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: christer.holmberg@ericsson.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) Resent-To: draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@ietf.org Resent-Message-Id: <20150414110816.12F7D1A890C@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 04:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: christer.holmberg@ericsson.com Archived-At: Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 04:09:54 -0700 Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-05 X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:08:18 -0000 Hi Tom, >> Q1_10-1: In the IANA Considerations section, IANA is requested to regist= er new values. However, it is not mentioned in which registry the new value= s will be registered. > > > >Christer > >You puzzle me. When I look in the I-D I see > >"IANA is requested to assign a value in the SnmpAuthProtocols registry " > >which looks to me like a mention of which registry the new values will be = registered in. You are right, I missed that. Sorry for the confusion. I withdraw the comme= nt. Regards, Christer From nobody Tue Apr 14 07:14:00 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@virtual.ietf.org Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 5933C1A92BA; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:13:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4351A92AB for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:13:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=unavailable Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ROThInps_jOq for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:13:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C44541A92BA for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:13:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-db3on0116.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.55.234.116]:19656 helo=emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1Yi1b6-0005ud-KL for draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@tools.ietf.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:13:56 -0700 Received: from pc6 (81.151.162.168) by DB3PR07MB060.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.137.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.130.23; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:38:42 +0000 Message-ID: <020c01d0769f$0076aec0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> From: t.petch To: Christer Holmberg , References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D793917@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:36:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Originating-IP: [81.151.162.168] X-ClientProxiedBy: DB3PR08CA0041.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (25.161.51.179) To DB3PR07MB060.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.137.151) Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ietfc@btconnect.com; X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB3PR07MB060; X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: BMV:1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(13464003)(377454003)(15975445007)(50226001)(47776003)(62966003)(77156002)(40100003)(61296003)(1456003)(4001410100001)(42186005)(230783001)(122386002)(77096005)(33646002)(50466002)(86362001)(87976001)(1556002)(46102003)(92566002)(62236002)(44716002)(66066001)(23756003)(14496001)(116806002)(81816999)(44736004)(19580405001)(19580395003)(84392001)(81686999)(76176999)(50986999)(74416001)(7726001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB3PR07MB060; H:pc6; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:nov; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(5002010); SRVR:DB3PR07MB060; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB3PR07MB060; X-Forefront-PRVS: 054642504A Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: btconnect.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Apr 2015 10:38:42.8583 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB3PR07MB060 X-Helo-Check-Failed: Verification failed for HELO emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 157.55.234.116 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ietfc@btconnect.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) Resent-To: draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@ietf.org Resent-Message-Id: <20150414141356.C44541A92BA@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:13:56 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: ietfc@btconnect.com Archived-At: Archived-At: Cc: opsawg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-05 X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:13:59 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christer Holmberg" To: Cc: Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2015 2:07 PM I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-05 Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date: 11 April 2015 IETF LC End Date: 20 April 2015 IETF Telechat Date: N/A Summary: The document is well written, and almost ready for publication. I do, however, have a couple of comments (see below). Major Issues: None Minor Issues: Q1_10-1: In the IANA Considerations section, IANA is requested to register new values. However, it is not mentioned in which registry the new values will be registered. Christer You puzzle me. When I look in the I-D I see "IANA is requested to assign a value in the SnmpAuthProtocols registry " which looks to me like a mention of which registry the new values will be registered in. Tom Petch Editorial nits: Q1_GENERAL-1: Regarding reference, sometimes you say "RFC XXXX [RFCXXXX]", sometimes "RFC XXXX" and sometimes "[RFCXXXX]". I think you should be consistent, and e.g. use "RFC XXXX [RFCXXXX]" on first occurrence, and then "RFC XXXX". In some cases "[RFCXXXX]" is ok, though, e.g. in section 9.4 where you say "SNMP-USER-BASED-SM-MIB [RFC3414].". ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > OPSAWG@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > From nobody Tue Apr 14 07:53:21 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 131E81ACDA2 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:53:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nTweMaESgX5g for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am1on0738.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe00::738]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57ECF1ACDE9 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:53:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc6 (81.151.162.168) by DBXPR07MB063.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.147.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.125.19; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:52:40 +0000 Message-ID: <010e01d076c2$7a30dce0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> From: t.petch To: References: <20150406163326.19239.91019.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:51:11 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Originating-IP: [81.151.162.168] X-ClientProxiedBy: AM3PR03CA036.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.191.164) To DBXPR07MB063.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.147.22) Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ietfc@btconnect.com; X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DBXPR07MB063; X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: BMV:1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(51704005)(13464003)(44716002)(19580395003)(19580405001)(40100003)(122386002)(92566002)(84392001)(42186005)(61296003)(76176999)(50986999)(50466002)(81816999)(1456003)(81686999)(44736004)(2351001)(110136001)(50226001)(14496001)(230783001)(116806002)(66066001)(62236002)(81156007)(86362001)(47776003)(77156002)(62966003)(15975445007)(77096005)(1720100001)(87976001)(33646002)(1556002)(46102003)(23756003)(74416001)(7726001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DBXPR07MB063; H:pc6; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:nov; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en; X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5002010)(5005006); SRVR:DBXPR07MB063; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DBXPR07MB063; X-Forefront-PRVS: 054642504A Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: btconnect.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Apr 2015 14:52:40.2365 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DBXPR07MB063 Archived-At: Cc: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: (HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in USM for SNMP) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:53:20 -0000 Warren I am used to seeing downrefs called out in the IETF Last Call notice. This I-D certainly has them but the Last Call notice makes no mention of them. Is this ok? Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "The IESG" To: "IETF-Announce" Cc: Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 5:33 PM > > The IESG has received a request from the Operations and Management Area > Working Group WG (opsawg) to consider the following document: > - 'HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in USM for SNMP' > as Proposed Standard > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2015-04-20. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > This memo specifies new HMAC-SHA-2 authentication protocols for the > User-based Security Model (USM) for SNMPv3 defined in RFC 3414. > > The file can be obtained via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp/ba llot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. From nobody Tue Apr 14 08:18:36 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E634C1B2D71 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:18:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -8.222 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.222 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pFALL9vppP5m for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60D9B1B2CB1 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:15:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6102; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429024551; x=1430234151; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=bT+k+2cnYSbsHqIEss90jdUqrUAFGDg1+qfAr2kTWPo=; b=nGzzgRz8rYnrApJJyyDMH7r5CdZ/TNnPvmQGCNs8mec5hah8ugIAIF50 8+QRpQ8TUXsK4lrp9AuhGh++Sc0TO79tCyEZ0KaQIlW54A1/nZg7stlDt 0HZOtlISOFTmInFnt/xE4O3GYNyl2J11UnJvx4dQToVnGRiWNKkI5bCEp 0=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BeBACsLi1V/5xdJa1cgwxSXAWDEMFsZgmBRAqFM04egSc4FAEBAQEBAQF9hCABAQICAQEBGhc6HQEGAhgEIwUEJQsUBg0EARKIKQENmFycfAiVfgEBAQEGAQEBAQEBARcEgR2KDoRJGIMGgUkFkQ6DeYYYgR2DN4xLg00iggMcgVBvAYFDfwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,576,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="141132240" Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Apr 2015 15:15:50 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com [173.36.12.78]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3EFFovr022070 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:15:50 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.4.196]) by xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com ([173.36.12.78]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:15:50 -0500 From: "Rajesh Pazhyannur (rpazhyan)" To: Youjianjie , Warren Kumari , "opsawg@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: =?gb2312?B?tPC4tDogW09QU0FXR10gtPC4tDogIEFub3RoZXIgQ0FQV0FQIGRvY3VtZW50?= Thread-Index: AQHQdsXjOnzQHzDEck6zMsE9MGobjw== Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:15:49 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.6.141106 x-originating-ip: [171.70.240.25] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-ID: <5A28A01FA8ABCA4781A67030C3185E6D@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogILTwuLQ6ICBBbm90aGVyIENBUFdBUCBkb2N1?= =?gb2312?b?bWVudA==?= X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:18:35 -0000 SGVsbG8gSmlhbmppZQ0KDQoNCg0KT24gNC8xMy8xNSwgODowNSBQTSwgIllvdWppYW5qaWUiIDx5 b3VqaWFuamllQGh1YXdlaS5jb20+IHdyb3RlOg0KDQo+SGkgUmFqZXNoLA0KPg0KPlRoYW5rcyBm b3IgdGhlIHF1ZXN0aW9ucyENCj4NCj5bZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1vcHNhd2ctY2Fwd2FwLWFsdC10dW5u ZWwtMDRdIGRlc2NyaWJlczogInRoZSBBQyBwcm92aWRlcyB0aGUNCj5hbHRlcm5hdGUgdHVubmVs IGVuY2Fwc3VsYXRpb24gbWVzc2FnZSBlbGVtZW50IGNvbnRhaW5pbmcgdGhlIHR1bm5lbCB0eXBl DQo+YW5kIGEgdHVubmVsLXNwZWNpZmljIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIGVsZW1lbnQgd2hpbGUgY29uZmln dXJpbmcgdGhlIFdUUC4iDQo+RnJvbSB0aGUgZm9ybWF0IG9mIEFsdGVybmF0ZSBUdW5uZWwgRW5j YXBzdWxhdGlvbnMgVHlwZSAoRmlndXJlIDYpLCBpdA0KPnNlZW1zIG9ubHkgb25lIHR1bm5lbCBp cyBzcGVjaWZpZWQgYmV0d2VlbiB0aGUgV1RQIGFuZCBBUi4NCj4NCj5bZHJhZnQteW91LW9wc2F3 Zy1jYXB3YXAtc2VwYXJhdGlvbi1mb3ItbXAtMDBdIGZvY3VzZXMgb24gdGhlIG11bHRpLVZOT3MN Cj5zY2VuYXJpby4gV2hlbiB0aGUgV1RQIGpvaW5zIHRoZSBBQywgaWYgdGhlIFdUUCBzZXJ2aWNl cyBtdWx0aS1WTk9zIChpLmUuDQo+ZGlmZmVyZW50IFNTSUQgZm9yIGRpZmZlcmVudCBWTk8sIGFu ZCB1c2VyIGRhdGEgY2FuIGJlIGRpcmVjdGx5IHN0ZWVyZWQNCj50byBpdHMgY29ycmVzcG9uZGlu ZyBWTk8gZG9tYWluIHZpYSB0aGUgV1RQIGFuZCBBUiB0dW5uZWwpLCB0aGVuIHRoZSBBQw0KPnNo b3VsZCBwcm92aWRlIHRoZSBXVFAgd2l0aCBtdWx0aXBsZSB0dW5uZWwgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gKGUu Zy4gU1NJRCwgQVINCj5hZGRyZXNzIGZvciBlYWNoIHR1bm5lbCkuIEFjdHVhbGx5IHRoaXMgZHJh ZnQgaXMgbm90IGJvdW5kIHdpdGggdHVubmVsDQo+ZW5jYXBzdWxhdGlvbiBuZWdvdGlhdGlvbiBw cm9wb3NlZCBpbg0KPltkcmFmdC1pZXRmLW9wc2F3Zy1jYXB3YXAtYWx0LXR1bm5lbC0wNF0uIFRo ZXNlIHR3byBkcmFmdHMgY2FuIGJlDQo+Y29tcGxlbWVudGFyeS4NCg0KVGhlIGN1cnJlbnQgZHJh ZnQgZG9lcyBhbGxvdyBmb3IgZGlmZmVyZW50IEFSIHRvIGJlIHByb3ZpZGVkIGZvciBkaWZmZXJl bnQNClNTSURzLiBTbyBpdCBzaG91bGQgc3VwcG9ydCB0aGUgc2NlbmFyaW8geW91IGRlc2NyaWJl Lg0KQ291bGQgeW91IHRha2UgYW5vdGhlciBsb29rIGF0IHRoZSBkcmFmdCBhbmQgc2VlIGlmIHRo ZXJlIGFueSBnYXBzLg0KDQo+DQo+U28gSSB0aGluayB0aGUgbWFpbiBnYXAgaXMgZHVyaW5nIHRo ZSBXVFAgY29uZmlndXJhdGlvbiwgd2hhdCBraW5kIG9mDQo+aW5mb3JtYXRpb24gQUMgc2hhbGwg cHJvdmlkZT8gQWx0ZXJuYXRlIFR1bm5lbCBFbmNhcHN1bGF0aW9ucz8gbXVsdGlwbGUNCj50dW5u ZWwgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gZm9yIGRpZmZlcmVudCBWTk9zPyBJIHRoaW5rIHRoaXMgZGVwZW5kcyBv biB0aGUNCj5zcGVjaWZpYyBzY2VuYXJpb3MuDQoNClRoZSBBQyBwcm92aWRlZCBpbmZvcm1hdGlv biAoQVIsIGV0YykgaXMgb24gYSBXTEFOIGJhc2lzLg0KDQo+DQo+VGhhbmtzLA0KPkppYW5qaWUN Cj4NCj4NCj4+IC0tLS0t08q8/tStvP4tLS0tLQ0KPj4gt6K8/sjLOiBSYWplc2ggUGF6aHlhbm51 ciAocnBhemh5YW4pIFttYWlsdG86cnBhemh5YW5AY2lzY28uY29tXQ0KPj4gt6LLzcqxvOQ6IDIw MTXE6jTUwjE0yNUgNDo0NQ0KPj4gytW8/sjLOiBZb3VqaWFuamllOyBXYXJyZW4gS3VtYXJpOyBv cHNhd2dAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4+INb3zOI6IFJlOiBbT1BTQVdHXSC08Li0OiBBbm90aGVyIENBUFdB UCBkb2N1bWVudA0KPj4gDQo+PiBIZWxsb6GtDQo+PiANCj4+IENhbiB0aGUgYXV0aG9ycyBleHBs YWluIHdoeSB0aGUgcHJvYmxlbSBzdGF0ZW1lbnQgZm9yIHRoaXMgY2Fubm90IGJlDQo+PiBhZGRy ZXNzZWQgd2l0aGluIHRoZSBmcmFtZXdvcmsgb2YgdGhlICJBbHRlcm5hdGUgVHVubmVsIEVuY2Fw c3VsYXRpb24NCj4+Zm9yDQo+PiBEYXRhIEZyYW1lcyBpbiBDQVBXQVChsS4gU3BlY2lmaWNhbGx5 LCB3aGF0IGFyZSB0aGUgZ2FwcyA/DQo+PiANCj4+IFRoZSBhbHRlcm5hdGUgdHVubmVsIGRyYWZ0 IGRvZXMgYWxsb3cgZm9yIGRpZmZlcmVudCBBUiB0byBiZSBzcGVjaWZpZWQNCj4+Zm9yDQo+PiBk aWZmZXJlbnQgV0xBTnMuDQo+PiBPbmUgZ2FwIGlzIHdoZXRoZXIgc3VjaCBjYXBhYmlsaXR5IChz dXBwb3J0aW5nIG9uZSBhbHRlcm5hdGUgdHVubmVsDQo+PnZlcnN1cw0KPj4gbXVsdGlwbGUgYWx0 ZXJuYXRlIHR1bm5lbHMpIG5lZWRzIHRvIGJlIG5lZ290aWF0ZWQgb3Igbm90ID8NCj4+IA0KPj4g DQo+PiBSZWdhcmRzDQo+PiANCj4+IFJhamVzaA0KPj4gDQo+PiBPbiA0LzEzLzE1LCAxOjI4IEFN LCAiWW91amlhbmppZSIgPHlvdWppYW5qaWVAaHVhd2VpLmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6DQo+PiANCj4+ID5I aSwNCj4+ID4NCj4+ID5UaGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IHN1cHBvcnRzIHRoZSBXVFAgZXN0YWJsaXNoZXMg ZGF0YSB0dW5uZWxzIHdpdGggZGlmZmVyZW50DQo+PiA+QWNjZXNzIFJvdXRlcnMgKEFScyksIHdo aWNoIG1heSBiZWxvbmcgdG8gZGlmZmVyZW50IFZpcnR1YWwgTmV0d29yaw0KPj4gPk9wZXJhdG9y cyAoVk5PcykuDQo+PiA+VGhlIHNsaWRlcyBhcmUgYXZhaWxhYmxlOg0KPj4gPmh0dHBzOi8vdG9v bHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvYWdlbmRhLzkyL3NsaWRlcy9zbGlkZXMtOTItb3BzYXdnLTQucGRmDQo+PiA+ WW91ciBxdWVzdGlvbnMgYW5kIGNvbW1lbnRzIGFyZSBhcHByZWNpYXRlZC4NCj4+ID4NCj4+ID5U aGFua3MsDQo+PiA+SmlhbmppZQ0KPj4gPg0KPj4gPj4gLS0tLS3Tyrz+1K28/i0tLS0tDQo+PiA+ PiC3orz+yMs6IE9QU0FXRyBbbWFpbHRvOm9wc2F3Zy1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXSC0+rHtIFdh cnJlbiBLdW1hcmkNCj4+ID4+ILeiy83KsbzkOiAyMDE1xOo01MIxMcjVIDE6MDkNCj4+ID4+IMrV vP7Iyzogb3BzYXdnQGlldGYub3JnDQo+PiA+PiDW98ziOiBbT1BTQVdHXSBBbm90aGVyIENBUFdB UCBkb2N1bWVudA0KPj4gPj4NCj4+ID4+IEhpIGFsbCwNCj4+ID4+DQo+PiA+PiBQbGVhc2UgdGFr ZSBhIGxvb2sgYXQgIkNBUFdBUCBDb250cm9sIGFuZCBEYXRhIENoYW5uZWwgU2VwYXJhdGlvbiBm b3INCj4+ID4+IE11bHRpLXByb3ZpZGVyIFNjZW5hcmlvIg0KPj4gPj4NCj4+ID4+KGh0dHBzOi8v dG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRtbC9kcmFmdC15b3Utb3BzYXdnLWNhcHdhcC1zZXBhcmF0aW9uLWZv ci1tcA0KPj4gPj4tMDANCj4+ID4+KQ0KPj4gPj4NCj4+ID4+IFRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgd2FzIGRp c2N1c3NlZCBzb21ld2hhdCBhdCB0aGUgZmFjZSB0byBmYWNlIG1lZXRpbmcgaW4NCj4+ID4+RGFs bGFzLg0KPj4gPj4gV2UgaGF2ZSBkaXNjdXNzZWQgdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCB3aXRoIG91ciBBRHMg YW5kIGhhdmUgZGVjaWRlZCB0aGF0IGl0DQo+PiA+PmlzICBzdWZmaWNpZW50bHkgZGlmZmVyZW50 IHRvIHRoZSBDQVBXQVAgQUxUIFR1bm5lbCAod2hpY2ggaXMgd2l0aCB0aGUNCj4+ID4+SUVTRyks IGFuZCAgdGhhdCBBTFQgVHVubmVsIGlzIHN1ZmZpY2llbnRseSBmZ2FyIGluIHRoZSBwcm9jZXNz IHRoYXQNCj4+ID4+d2Ugd2lsbCBrZWVwIHRoaXMgIGRvY3VtZW50IHNlcGFyYXRlLi4uDQo+PiA+ Pg0KPj4gPj4gU28sIHBsZWFzZSB0YWtlIGEgbG9vayBhdCBpdCwgYW5kIHByb3ZpZGUgaW5pdGlh bCBmZWVkYmFjayBXZSB3aWxsDQo+PiA+PmNvbnNpZGVyIGhhdmluZyAgYSBjYWxsIGZvciBhZG9w dGlvbiBpZiB0aGVyZSBpcyBlbm91Z2ggZXZpZGVuY2Ugb2YNCj4+ID4+aW50ZXJlc3QuLi4uDQo+ PiA+Pg0KPj4gPj4gVw0KPj4gPj4gLS0NCj4+ID4+IEkgZG9uJ3QgdGhpbmsgdGhlIGV4ZWN1dGlv biBpcyByZWxldmFudCB3aGVuIGl0IHdhcyBvYnZpb3VzbHkgYSBiYWQNCj4+ID4+aWRlYSBpbiB0 aGUgIGZpcnN0IHBsYWNlLg0KPj4gPj4gVGhpcyBpcyBsaWtlIHB1dHRpbmcgcmFiaWQgd2Vhc2Vs cyBpbiB5b3VyIHBhbnRzLCBhbmQgbGF0ZXINCj4+ID4+ZXhwcmVzc2luZyByZWdyZXQgYXQgIGhh dmluZyBjaG9zZW4gdGhvc2UgcGFydGljdWxhciByYWJpZCB3ZWFzZWxzIGFuZA0KPj4gPj50aGF0 IHBhaXIgb2YgcGFudHMuDQo+PiA+PiAgICAtLS1tYWYNCj4+ID4+DQo+PiA+PiBfX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KPj4gPj4gT1BTQVdHIG1haWxp bmcgbGlzdA0KPj4gPj4gT1BTQVdHQGlldGYub3JnDQo+PiA+PiBodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9y Zy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL29wc2F3Zw0KPj4gPl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQo+PiA+T1BTQVdHIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KPj4gPk9QU0FX R0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KPj4gPmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vb3Bz YXdnDQo+DQoNCg== From nobody Tue Apr 14 08:45:59 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 785171B2D3E for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:45:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.378 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iuDvbFB1fOfa for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:45:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8A3C1B2D2A for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:45:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wiun10 with SMTP id n10so27074291wiu.1 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:45:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=2u6bfwbEllDDSzWXbxxqdGsZ2RJ9ECkw+BULtjGvtk8=; b=b1WuSndnrdci3nsRNBf7fWPN8JF8e07tCFH5z5TszSYOoCLADwPqnbVutNkO+qTPiD 7GAluJK3kmeKSP2U1RHv6XTI8dXPQlv8EK5ce+6fgVIJRS+3rgrsxbGdlbGCOC13kQX3 X+3gTUosCYJKGGlHC6JALhhjNQ8Ku0cLnFhOhsPoK2vTellgCuITyU2SYgqweS9rbKsl EA1+9iMdWugBlz0khdN5dbNUKjHOWwTZbEPnQFI6HpDbvdjH58vdQ8GVV6Sd1yr3Az7r ovzI8OZW15RoXjAZN/NskJuQnKnAWIL2+SXeJZbDGkoZ08N7b0dJbVRcIMt5rmLif2Hg s3Bg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmybqKDKYUCuVbQJnImt+BeUZ9VxVGMgXwq64yMkDvRXefvl3oiCEkuHZcnz/1p1RPeVsEg MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.93.166 with SMTP id cv6mr32983207wib.89.1429026354496; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:45:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.110.97 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:45:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <010e01d076c2$7a30dce0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> References: <20150406163326.19239.91019.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <010e01d076c2$7a30dce0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:45:54 -0400 Message-ID: From: Warren Kumari To: "t.petch" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Archived-At: Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: (HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in USM for SNMP) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:45:57 -0000 On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:51 AM, t.petch wrote: > Warren > > I am used to seeing downrefs called out in the IETF Last Call notice. > > This I-D certainly has them but the Last Call notice makes no mention of > them. Is this ok? I believe so -- the document shepherd writeup has a specific section for downrefs: "(15) Are there downward normative references references (see RFC 3967)? If so, list these downward references to support the Area Director in the Last Call procedure." and the downrefs are listed in the full writeup: "(15) Are there downward normative references references (see RFC 3967)? ** YES ** Normative reference to an Informational RFC 2104 Non-RFC normative reference 'SHA' Normative reference to an Informational RFC 6234 RFC 2104 and RFC 6234 are in the downregreg (which is currently throwing 500 Errors) SHA references: National Institute of Standards and Technology, "Secure Hash Standard (SHS)", FIPS PUB 180-4, March 2012. Note that RFC2014 and RFC6234 also reference versions of this document. " I do not think that the downrefs (especially ones that are well known) are usually listed in the LC. W > > Tom Petch > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "The IESG" > To: "IETF-Announce" > Cc: > Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 5:33 PM > > >> >> The IESG has received a request from the Operations and Management > Area >> Working Group WG (opsawg) to consider the following document: >> - 'HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in USM for SNMP' >> as Proposed Standard >> >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits >> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the >> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2015-04-20. Exceptionally, comments may > be >> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the >> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. >> >> Abstract >> >> >> This memo specifies new HMAC-SHA-2 authentication protocols for the >> User-based Security Model (USM) for SNMPv3 defined in RFC 3414. >> >> The file can be obtained via >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp/ >> >> IESG discussion can be tracked via >> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp/ba > llot/ >> >> >> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf From nobody Tue Apr 14 11:34:39 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168721A9110; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:34:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.011 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oU9VFke0ZbVJ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:34:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 379481A9120; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:34:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.105] ([79.246.54.63]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LcSWg-1Z86k73KMQ-00ju4D; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 20:34:30 +0200 Message-ID: <552D5DB2.3050707@gmx.net> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 20:34:26 +0200 From: "B.-C. Boesch" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: saag@ietf.org, sacm@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, OPSAWG@ietf.org, kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:x/hiVNx6GnGPLAu5C8KUv8pA5EqzqgnpDi3627X0H/qlLZ8IM1K wBip/iZhxLU5AbfAgANFTPChfIjYnKXs6G4iX67fn9DJTX3sOCEz0qRagkQ/wmKAi3GYUZF 0/fI1I6e68f6HIaTSXHPTmFR5tm0yu9GpLX8sM3XAqClePHMlr8gH5/GBNlgila8t8oNg81 IM8MoV4R9CO0qNeCZRQJw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Archived-At: Subject: [OPSAWG] Review: Internet Draft: draft-boesch-idxp-idpef-01.txt X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 18:34:38 -0000 Dear Community, after posting of version 00 of the approach for Standardized Parameterization of Intrusion Detection Entities I got positive feedback and some suggestions to improve the interoperability with other standards. So I update the Internet Draft and post a new version. I am looking forward to your suggestions, feedback, notations, hints, recommendations, etc. to improve the Internet Draft for standardized Intrusion Detection Parametrization. The updated version of the Internet Draft could be found at: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-boesch-idxp-idpef-01.txt I looking forward to a lively discussion. Kind regards, B.-C. Boesch From nobody Wed Apr 15 21:12:31 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 638991B2E0D for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 21:12:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.31 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4_WeEwP3tnfN for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 21:12:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 349791B2DFF for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 21:12:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mb-aye.local (c-98-248-47-249.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.248.47.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t3G4CMs2011709 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 16 Apr 2015 04:12:23 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com) To: "t.petch" , warren@kumari.net references: <20150406163326.19239.91019.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <010e01d076c2$7a30dce0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> From: joel jaeggli x-enigmail-draft-status: N1110 message-id: <552F36A3.7050507@bogus.com> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 21:12:19 -0700 user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 mime-version: 1.0 in-reply-to: <010e01d076c2$7a30dce0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rxvhqCb4QnDKSQDovp2VO3eRNljM3w3NX" Archived-At: Cc: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: (HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in USM for SNMP) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 04:12:30 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --rxvhqCb4QnDKSQDovp2VO3eRNljM3w3NX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 4/14/15 7:51 AM, t.petch wrote: > Warren >=20 > I am used to seeing downrefs called out in the IETF Last Call notice. >=20 > This I-D certainly has them but the Last Call notice makes no mention o= f > them. Is this ok? I gave this a little (not a lot) of thought during the ad review. My interpretation was that downrefs to rfc 2104 are sufficiently ubiquiious to not merit further discussion let alone further review. if that's not an universaly held opinion I suppose we should hear that. both it and 6234 have visited the downref registry previously in 2104's case there are something like 200 references to it from subsequent RFCs. if the secdir would like to start a shooting war over references to HMAC (which I doubt) I'll respect that but it's not really my wheelhouse. thanks joel > Tom Petch >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "The IESG" > To: "IETF-Announce" > Cc: > Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 5:33 PM >=20 >=20 >> >> The IESG has received a request from the Operations and Management > Area >> Working Group WG (opsawg) to consider the following document: >> - 'HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in USM for SNMP' >> as Proposed Standard >> >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits >> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the= >> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2015-04-20. Exceptionally, comments may= > be >> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the >> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. >> >> Abstract >> >> >> This memo specifies new HMAC-SHA-2 authentication protocols for the= >> User-based Security Model (USM) for SNMPv3 defined in RFC 3414. >> >> The file can be obtained via >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp/= >> >> IESG discussion can be tracked via >> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp/b= a > llot/ >> >> >> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > OPSAWG@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg >=20 --rxvhqCb4QnDKSQDovp2VO3eRNljM3w3NX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAlUvNqMACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrLGtgCfeAvBYO1ur4GYRVY8KKxeMjtI pIQAn1qX7nhTIbat5IMdu1srA3tu/Pqn =Y0fZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rxvhqCb4QnDKSQDovp2VO3eRNljM3w3NX-- From nobody Fri Apr 17 13:39:39 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075381A8722; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:39:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -86.912 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-86.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_SBL=20, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YocQTZbkvWVx; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:39:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996101A8896; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:39:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 1E15C180205; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:38:44 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20150417203844.1E15C180205@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:38:44 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, opsawg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [OPSAWG] RFC 7494 on IEEE 802.11 Medium Access Control (MAC) Profile for Control and Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 20:39:35 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 7494 Title: IEEE 802.11 Medium Access Control (MAC) Profile for Control and Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) Author: C. Shao, H. Deng, R. Pazhyannur, F. Bari, R. Zhang, S. Matsushima Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: April 2015 Mailbox: shaochunju@chinamobile.com, denghui@chinamobile.com, rpazhyan@cisco.com, farooq.bari@att.com, zhangr@gsta.com, satoru.matsushima@g.softbank.co.jp Pages: 13 Characters: 23378 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-hybridmac-08.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7494 The Control and Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) protocol binding for IEEE 802.11 defines two Medium Access Control (MAC) modes for IEEE 802.11 Wireless Transmission Points (WTPs): Split and Local MAC. In the Split MAC mode, the partitioning of encryption/decryption functions is not clearly defined. In the Split MAC mode description, IEEE 802.11 encryption is specified as located in either the Access Controller (AC) or the WTP, with no clear way for the AC to inform the WTP of where the encryption functionality should be located. This leads to interoperability issues, especially when the AC and WTP come from different vendors. To prevent interoperability issues, this specification defines an IEEE 802.11 MAC Profile message element in which each profile specifies an unambiguous division of encryption functionality between the WTP and AC. This document is a product of the Operations and Management Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From nobody Mon Apr 20 07:15:52 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7031B2C2A; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 07:15:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.61 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wo58djnBFU6C; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 07:15:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from a.mx.secunet.com (a.mx.secunet.com [195.81.216.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C3A11B2C29; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 07:15:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (alg1 [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3101A0080; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:15:32 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id yiPHHITze3oQ; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:15:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-essen-01.secunet.de (unknown [10.53.40.204]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1A51A007F; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:15:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.208.1.212] (10.208.1.212) by mail-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:15:43 +0200 Message-ID: <55350A0F.7080709@secunet.com> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:15:43 +0200 From: Johannes Merkle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christer Holmberg , t.petch , "gen-art@ietf.org" References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D793917@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <020c01d0769f$0076aec0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D7986AF@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D7986AF@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.208.1.212] X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10 Archived-At: Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-05 X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:15:50 -0000 Dear all, I will revise the draft according to the remaining comments. Johannes Christer Holmberg schrieb am 14.04.2015 um 13:08: > Hi Tom, > >>> Q1_10-1: In the IANA Considerations section, IANA is requested to register new values. However, it is not mentioned in which registry the new values will be registered. >> >> >> >> Christer >> >> You puzzle me. When I look in the I-D I see >> >> "IANA is requested to assign a value in the SnmpAuthProtocols registry " >> >> which looks to me like a mention of which registry the new values will be registered in. > > You are right, I missed that. Sorry for the confusion. I withdraw the comment. > > Regards, > > Christer > > From nobody Mon Apr 20 07:27:18 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364671B2DF5; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 07:27:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.61 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6uPqMHGJFAfH; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 07:27:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from a.mx.secunet.com (a.mx.secunet.com [195.81.216.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34BC61B2DF4; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 07:27:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (alg1 [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281C31A0084; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:27:02 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id lu_4LF_APBwG; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:27:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-essen-01.secunet.de (unknown [10.53.40.204]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183DD1A0083; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:27:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.208.1.212] (10.208.1.212) by mail-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:27:13 +0200 Message-ID: <55350CC0.40403@secunet.com> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:27:12 +0200 From: Johannes Merkle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christer Holmberg , t.petch , "gen-art@ietf.org" References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D793917@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <020c01d0769f$0076aec0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D7986AF@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D7986AF@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.208.1.212] X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10 Archived-At: Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-05 X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:27:17 -0000 another suggestion: I'd linke to change the title from HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in USM for SNMP to HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in USM for SNMPv3 ^^ Do you agree? -- Johannes From nobody Tue Apr 21 03:48:39 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8ECC1A9134; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 03:48:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fX8hf61XOe43; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 03:48:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D7ED1A9120; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 03:48:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150421104834.16701.12682.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 03:48:34 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-06.txt X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:48:36 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. Title : HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in USM for SNMPv3 Authors : Johannes Merkle Manfred Lochter Filename : draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-06.txt Pages : 13 Date : 2015-04-21 Abstract: This memo specifies new HMAC-SHA-2 authentication protocols for the User-based Security Model (USM) for SNMPv3 defined in RFC 3414. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-06 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-06 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Wed Apr 22 08:04:21 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1FE71B36BB for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:04:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.61 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id esoQWRu8uVD9 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:04:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from a.mx.secunet.com (a.mx.secunet.com [195.81.216.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15CC61B36B1 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:04:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (alg1 [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0541A0080 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:03:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id lj39o72Em_Sw for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:03:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-essen-01.secunet.de (unknown [10.53.40.204]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0ED31A007C for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:03:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.208.1.212] (10.208.1.212) by mail-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:04:10 +0200 Message-ID: <5537B869.6030901@secunet.com> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:04:09 +0200 From: Johannes Merkle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <20150421104834.16701.12682.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20150421104834.16701.12682.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.208.1.212] X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-06.txt X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:04:20 -0000 Hi, the new version addresses Christer's comments. Furthermore, I've changed in the title SNMP to SNMPv3. Johannes internet-drafts@ietf.org schrieb am 21.04.2015 um 12:48: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in USM for SNMPv3 > Authors : Johannes Merkle > Manfred Lochter > Filename : draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-06.txt > Pages : 13 > Date : 2015-04-21 > > Abstract: > This memo specifies new HMAC-SHA-2 authentication protocols for the > User-based Security Model (USM) for SNMPv3 defined in RFC 3414. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-06 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-06 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > OPSAWG@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > > From nobody Thu Apr 23 10:13:09 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002261ACDBC; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:13:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xy2gqxZa2nZv; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5311B1ACDA7; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:13:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BRT49007; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 17:12:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from DFWEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.72) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:12:58 +0100 Received: from DFWEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.50]) by dfweml702-chm ([10.193.5.72]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:12:53 -0700 From: Linda Dunbar To: "i2nsf@ietf.org" , "i2rs@ietf.org" , "netmod@ietf.org" , "sacm@ietf.org" , "pcp@ietf.org" , "sfc@ietf.org" , "dots@ietf.org" , "opsawg@ietf.org" , "ops-dir@ietf.org" , "ops-ads@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: I2NSF: Interface to network security functions : problem-statement, framework, use cases, and potential solution Thread-Index: AQHQfeL7u793L89A7kyGIFebPlU0DZ1aykFw Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 17:12:53 +0000 Message-ID: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F657C09765@dfweml701-chm> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.192.11.72] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Cc: "mile@ietf.org" Subject: [OPSAWG] I2NSF: Interface to network security functions : problem-statement, framework, use cases, and potential solution X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 17:13:05 -0000 VGhlICJpMm5zZi1wcm9ibGVtLXN0YXRlbWVudCIgZHJhZnQgZGVzY3JpYmVzIHRoZSBtb3RpdmF0 aW9uIGFuZCB0aGUgcHJvYmxlbSBzcGFjZSBhc3NvY2lhdGVkIHdpdGggc2VydmljZSBwcm92aWRl cnMgcHJvdmlkaW5nIGhvc3RlZCBzZWN1cml0eSBzb2x1dGlvbnMgdG8gZGVsaXZlciBjb3N0LWVm ZmVjdGl2ZSBtYW5hZ2VkIHNlY3VyaXR5IHNlcnZpY2VzIHRvIGVudGVycHJpc2UgY3VzdG9tZXJz IHdobyBkb24ndCBvd24gb3IgaGF2ZSB0aGUgc2VjdXJpdHkgZnVuY3Rpb25zIG9uIHRoZWlyIHBy ZW1pc2VzLiANCg0KU2luY2UgdGhlIGkybnNmLXByb2JsZW0tc3RhdGVtZW50LTAxIGRyYWZ0LCB0 aHJlZSBJMk5TRiB1c2UgY2FzZSBkcmFmdHMsIGEgZ2FwIGFuYWx5c2lzIGRyYWZ0LCBhbmQgYSBw YWNrZXQtYmFzZWQgcGFyYWRpZ20gZHJhZnQgaGF2ZSBiZWVuIHB1Ymxpc2hlZC4gDQpXZSByZW1v dmVkIHRoZSByZWR1bmRhbnQgY29udGVudCBmcm9tIHRoZSBwcm9ibGVtIHN0YXRlbWVudCBkcmFm dCwgbWFraW5nIGl0IGZvY3VzIGV4Y2x1c2l2ZWx5IG9uIHRoZSBwcm9ibGVtIHNwYWNlIG9mIHNl Y3VyaXR5IGZ1bmN0aW9ucyBub3QgaG9zdGVkIG9uIGN1c3RvbWVyJ3MgcHJlbWlzZXMgYW5kIGJl aW5nIGRpc3RyaWJ1dGVkIChkcml2ZW4gYnkgTkZWIGFuZCBob3N0ZWQgc2VjdXJpdHkgc2Vydmlj ZXMpLg0KDQpJbiBjb25qdW5jdGlvbiB3aXRoIHRoZSAiaTJuc2YtcHJvYmxlbS1zdGF0ZW1lbnRz IiwgdGhlcmUgYXJlIGFsc28gSTJOU0YgZnJhbWV3b3JrIGRyYWZ0LCBwb3RlbnRpYWwgSTJOU0Yg c29sdXRpb24gZHJhZnQsIHVzZSBjYXNlIGRyYWZ0cyAodW5kZXIgcHJvY2VzcyBvZiBtZXJnaW5n KSwgZ2FwLWFuYWx5c2lzIGFuZCBkYXRhIG1vZGVsaW5nIGRyYWZ0Og0KDQpodHRwOi8vZGF0YXRy YWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvZG9jL2RyYWZ0LW1lcmdlZC1pMm5zZi1mcmFtZXdvcmsvDQoNCmh0dHA6 Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9kb2MvZHJhZnQtbG9wZXotaTJuc2YtcGFja2V0Lw0KDQpo dHRwOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvZG9jL2RyYWZ0LXhpYS1pMm5zZi1jYXBhYmlsaXR5 LWludGVyZmFjZS1pbS8gKG5ldyByZXZpc2lvbiBpcyB0byBiZSB1cGxvYWRlZCBzb29uIHRvIHJl ZmxlY3QgdGhlIGRpc2N1c3Npb24gb2YgRjJGIG1lZXRpbmdzIGF0IElFVEY5MiBEYWxsYXMpLiAN Cg0KaHR0cDovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFmdC1wYXN0b3ItaTJuc2YtYWNj ZXNzLXVzZWNhc2VzLw0KaHR0cDovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFmdC1xaS1p Mm5zZi1hY2Nlc3MtbmV0d29yay11c2VjYXNlLw0KaHR0cDovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3Jn L2RvYy9kcmFmdC16YXJueS1pMm5zZi1kYXRhLWNlbnRlci11c2UtY2FzZXMvDQoNCmh0dHA6Ly9k YXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9kb2MvZHJhZnQtemhhbmctZ2FwLWFuYWx5c2lzLw0KDQpJMk5T RiBpcyBhYm91dCBzZWN1cml0eSBmdW5jdGlvbnMgbWFuYWdlbWVudC4gVGhlIHVsdGltYXRlIGdv YWwgb2YgSTJOU0YgaXMgdG8gZW5hYmxlIGVudGVycHJpc2VzIHRvIHV0aWxpemUgc2VjdXJpdHkg ZnVuY3Rpb25zIG5vdCBob3N0ZWQgb24gdGhlaXIgb3duIHByZW1pc2UgYnV0IGluc3RlYWQgaG9z dGVkIGluIHNlcnZpY2UgcHJvdmlkZXIgZG9tYWluLCB0byBlc3RhYmxpc2ggaG93IHRvIGNvbW11 bmljYXRlIGRlc2lyZWQgc2VjdXJpdHkgcG9saWNpZXMgdG8gTlNGIGFuZCBob3cgdG8gZ2V0IHBl cmZvcm1hbmNlIGRhdGEgb3IgcmVwb3J0IG91dCBvZiBOU0YuICANCg0KQWxzbyBjb3B5IHRvIHRo ZSBJMk5TRiByZWxldmFudCBJRVRGIFdHczogSTJSUywgTkVUTU9ELCBORVRDT05GLCBTQUNNLCBN SUxFLCBQQ1AsIERPVFMsIFNGQywgYW5kIE9wQXJlYXMsIGluIGhvcGUgdG8gZ2V0IGZlZWRiYWNr IGFuZCBzdWdnZXN0aW9ucyBmcm9tIHdpZGVyIGF1ZGllbmNlLiANCg0KVGhhbmtzIGluIGFkdmFu Y2UsIA0KDQpMaW5kYSBEdW5iYXINCg0KLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206 IGludGVybmV0LWRyYWZ0c0BpZXRmLm9yZyBbbWFpbHRvOmludGVybmV0LWRyYWZ0c0BpZXRmLm9y Z10gDQpTZW50OiBUaHVyc2RheSwgQXByaWwgMjMsIDIwMTUgMTE6MzEgQU0NClRvOiBNb2hhbWVk IEJvdWNhZGFpcjsgU2hhaWJhbCBDaGFrcmFiYXJ0eTsgTGluZGEgRHVuYmFyOyBDaHJpc3RpYW4g SmFjcXVlbmV0OyBNeW8gWmFybnk7IENocmlzdGlhbiBKYWNxdWVuZXQ7IE15byBaYXJueTsgU2hh aWJhbCBDaGFrcmFiYXJ0eTsgTGluZGEgRHVuYmFyOyBNb2hhbWVkIEJvdWNhZGFpcg0KU3ViamVj dDogTmV3IFZlcnNpb24gTm90aWZpY2F0aW9uIGZvciBkcmFmdC1kdW5iYXItaTJuc2YtcHJvYmxl bS1zdGF0ZW1lbnQtMDMudHh0DQoNCg0KQSBuZXcgdmVyc2lvbiBvZiBJLUQsIGRyYWZ0LWR1bmJh ci1pMm5zZi1wcm9ibGVtLXN0YXRlbWVudC0wMy50eHQNCmhhcyBiZWVuIHN1Y2Nlc3NmdWxseSBz dWJtaXR0ZWQgYnkgTGluZGEgRHVuYmFyIGFuZCBwb3N0ZWQgdG8gdGhlIElFVEYgcmVwb3NpdG9y eS4NCg0KTmFtZToJCWRyYWZ0LWR1bmJhci1pMm5zZi1wcm9ibGVtLXN0YXRlbWVudA0KUmV2aXNp b246CTAzDQpUaXRsZToJCUludGVyZmFjZSB0byBOZXR3b3JrIFNlY3VyaXR5IEZ1bmN0aW9ucyAo STJOU0YpIFByb2JsZW0gU3RhdGVtZW50DQpEb2N1bWVudCBkYXRlOgkyMDE1LTA0LTIzDQpHcm91 cDoJCUluZGl2aWR1YWwgU3VibWlzc2lvbg0KUGFnZXM6CQkyMQ0KVVJMOiAgICAgICAgICAgIGh0 dHA6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaW50ZXJuZXQtZHJhZnRzL2RyYWZ0LWR1bmJhci1pMm5zZi1wcm9i bGVtLXN0YXRlbWVudC0wMy50eHQNClN0YXR1czogICAgICAgICBodHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFja2Vy LmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFmdC1kdW5iYXItaTJuc2YtcHJvYmxlbS1zdGF0ZW1lbnQvDQpIdG1s aXplZDogICAgICAgaHR0cDovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQtZHVuYmFyLWkybnNm LXByb2JsZW0tc3RhdGVtZW50LTAzDQpEaWZmOiAgICAgICAgICAgaHR0cDovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9y Zy9yZmNkaWZmP3VybDI9ZHJhZnQtZHVuYmFyLWkybnNmLXByb2JsZW0tc3RhdGVtZW50LTAzDQoN CkFic3RyYWN0Og0KICAgVGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBkZXNjcmliZXMgdGhlIG1vdGl2YXRpb24gYW5k IHRoZSBwcm9ibGVtIHN0YXRlbWVudCBmb3INCiAgIEludGVyZmFjZSB0byBOZXR3b3JrIFNlY3Vy aXR5IEZ1bmN0aW9ucyAoSTJOU0YpLg0KDQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgDQoNCg0K UGxlYXNlIG5vdGUgdGhhdCBpdCBtYXkgdGFrZSBhIGNvdXBsZSBvZiBtaW51dGVzIGZyb20gdGhl IHRpbWUgb2Ygc3VibWlzc2lvbiB1bnRpbCB0aGUgaHRtbGl6ZWQgdmVyc2lvbiBhbmQgZGlmZiBh cmUgYXZhaWxhYmxlIGF0IHRvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnLg0KDQpUaGUgSUVURiBTZWNyZXRhcmlhdA0K DQo= From nobody Sun Apr 26 12:34:04 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBE41A010D; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 12:34:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hkgrw7FEgqu0; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 12:34:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6171A00CF; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 12:34:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.1.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150426193400.6329.15244.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 12:34:00 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-05.txt X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 19:34:02 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. Title : Alternate Tunnel Encapsulation for Data Frames in CAPWAP Authors : Rong Zhang Zhen Cao Hui Deng Rajesh S. Pazhyannur Sri Gundavelli Li Xue Filename : draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-05.txt Pages : 21 Date : 2015-04-26 Abstract: Control And Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) defines a specification to encapsulate a station's data frames between the Wireless Transmission Point (WTP) and Access Controller (AC). Specifically, the station's IEEE 802.11 data frames can be either locally bridged or tunneled to the AC. When tunneled, a CAPWAP data channel is used for tunneling. In many deployments encapsulating data frames to an entity other than the AC (for example to an Access Router (AR)) is desirable. Further, it may also be desirable to use different tunnel encapsulations to carry the stations' data frames. This document provides a specification for this and refers to it as Alternate tunnel encapsulation. The Alternate tunnel encapsulation allows 1) the WTP to tunnel non-management data frames to an endpoint different from the AC and 2) the WTP to tunnel using one of many known encapsulation types such as IP-IP, IP-GRE, CAPWAP. The WTP may advertise support for Alternate tunnel encapsulation during the discovery or join process and AC may select one of the supported Alternate Tunnel encapsulation types while configuring the WTP. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-05 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-05 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Tue Apr 28 08:01:54 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFEDB1A89E1; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 04:34:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6JbeB0EG8wPx; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 04:34:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C80BA1A89A2; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 04:34:53 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f798d6d0000009ec-94-553f705b85c6 Received: from ESESSHC011.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id D0.26.02540.B507F355; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:34:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.61]) by ESESSHC011.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.51]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:34:51 +0200 From: Christer Holmberg To: Johannes Merkle , t.petch , "gen-art@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-05 Thread-Index: AdB0YG7imXzOINi3SuGZx0oB0oX6KACPr/JeAAD7sWABMI2RAAGQfqUg Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:34:51 +0000 Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D7DC0B3@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D793917@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <020c01d0769f$0076aec0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D7986AF@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <55350CC0.40403@secunet.com> In-Reply-To: <55350CC0.40403@secunet.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.17] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpnkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGfG3RjemwD7U4FALp8X3df2sFldffWax uPboPovFshmzGC1WnNzM5MDqsevoD3aPJUt+Mnlsal3C6vHl8me2AJYoLpuU1JzMstQifbsE roybR04yFvSyVvTOecXYwPiBuYuRk0NCwERi0cWPrBC2mMSFe+vZuhi5OIQEjjJKNLW3MUM4 ixklZqw+xd7FyMHBJmAh0f1PG6RBRKBS4mrbErAaZoFFjBLvX68HmyosECQx7e0uZoiiYImr XzpYIWw3ieMrV4LFWQRUJe59bQSL8wr4SqzrnMsOsewpo8Sy5o8sIAlOAU2Jkz+nsYHYjEDn fT+1hgnEZhYQl7j1ZD4TxNkCEkv2nId6R1Ti5eN/rCCHSggoSizvl4Mo15FYsPsTG4StLbFs 4WtmiL2CEidnPmGZwCg2C8nUWUhaZiFpmYWkZQEjyypG0eLU4qTcdCMjvdSizOTi4vw8vbzU kk2MwJg7uOW3wQ7Gl88dDzEKcDAq8fAufGkXKsSaWFZcmXuIUZqDRUmc1874UIiQQHpiSWp2 ampBalF8UWlOavEhRiYOTqkGRmdz7jhXW0f+pm3y9YmGex9vKA7zCb8lYfTC0uWG+qKjC4u4 f77b8VZJpyEobeLF5QyS/PpVsnYm1g0eAqHCyYeTbFTXMZnohWtGlTy5Gvdm7s8gsaw3sSZt jLy/D71o3CElqXRT9Fn7wxYOIbYpfRlNxrH9L+vOcr+aUtW0+diJbjETZQMlluKMREMt5qLi RABRCkSomgIAAA== Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 08:01:52 -0700 Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-05 X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:34:55 -0000 Looks ok to me. Regards, Christer -----Original Message----- From: Johannes Merkle [mailto:johannes.merkle@secunet.com]=20 Sent: 20. huhtikuuta 2015 17:27 To: Christer Holmberg; t.petch; gen-art@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@tools.ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.o= rg Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-sn= mp-05 another suggestion: I'd linke to change the title from HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in USM for SNMP to HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in USM for SNMPv3 ^^ Do you agree? -- Johannes From nobody Wed Apr 29 07:41:28 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD5F1A9302; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 07:41:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NQpfwHWUPanh; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 07:41:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 896361A92FC; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 07:41:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.100] ([79.246.0.185]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M2WgT-1Z6EPT3GuD-00sLJa; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:41:11 +0200 Message-ID: <5540ED82.5060905@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:41:06 +0200 From: "B.-C. Boesch" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: saag@ietf.org, sacm@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, OPSAWG@ietf.org, Kathleen Moriarty Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:4DcQihFGmy8BHMyzut72DzFwrrscnBtvP9t1dsdx1Yb/gZCz1sm fliv5NzKv4ffuyEKs0Ostm+RboG1wEdT42zlnYhYObFhqOUWObTK/QElc3oYDRV1eEauuSK 0tkQZCoyksr6Z3Tye4smX21WJvpKg75fPncJv8d555eUFMM0mjK4rGKX8O+jBSgoFsnFZgs J5u3NQMA3scJOo27OvKcA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Archived-At: Cc: Stephen Farrell Subject: [OPSAWG] Review and contribution requested: draft-boesch-idxp-idpef-01 (Bjoern-C. Boesch) X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 14:41:16 -0000 Dear community, I have post the attached draft and looking for feedback from people with security management and / or security (IDS) operations expertise (including IDS developer). I am particularly interested in your opinions on the communication proceedings, the parametrization methodology and the provided attributes (and such I did not think of). If the text needs updating by your point of view, please let me know that as well. Here is the link to the new draft: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-boesch-idxp-idpef-01.txt At the first view the draft looks very long but after page 44 a lot of examples and definitions are included for better understanding. So the first 43 pages are primary in scope for feedback but feedback for the other pages is welcome, too. Abstract The Intrusion Detection Parametrization Exchange Format (IDPEF) defines data formats and exchange procedures to standardize parametrization information exchange into intrusion detection and response systems from an independent central Manager to any Analyzer. The IDPEF enables a combination of different (vendor and analyzing technique) IDS Analyzers under one independent central Manager. A separate operations of IDS is not longer needed. Base is a new parametrization methodology where IDS operating parameters (configurations) are separated in an environmental parametrization part and a vendor-specific analyzing part. This Internet-Draft describes a data model to represent parametrization information of intrusion detection system entities, and explains the rationale for using this model. An implementation of the data model in the Extensible Markup Language (XML) is presented, a XML Document Type Definition is developed, and parametrization examples are provided. I am looking forward to your suggestions, feedback, notations, hints, recommendations, etc. to improve the Internet Draft. Also native speaker feedback with scope on wording and typo is welcome. Kind regards, Bjoern-C. From nobody Thu Apr 30 13:57:54 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF63B1A0107; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 13:57:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.911 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TfeqrDys53cM; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 13:57:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from extmail1.yaanatech.com (extmail1.yaanatech.com [63.128.177.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B42651A00D4; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 13:57:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.51] (pool-70-106-196-128.clppva.fios.verizon.net [70.106.196.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by extmail1.yaanatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A909958093; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 21:02:46 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5542974B.9080208@yaanatech.com> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:57:47 -0400 From: Tony Rutkowski Organization: Yaana Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "B.-C. Boesch" , saag@ietf.org, sacm@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, OPSAWG@ietf.org, Kathleen Moriarty References: <5540ED82.5060905@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <5540ED82.5060905@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: Cc: Stephen Farrell Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [sacm] Review and contribution requested: draft-boesch-idxp-idpef-01 (Bjoern-C. Boesch) X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: tony@yaanatech.com List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 20:57:51 -0000 How is this not like STIX? -t On 2015-04-29 10:41 AM, B.-C. Boesch wrote: > Abstract > > The Intrusion Detection Parametrization Exchange Format (IDPEF)=20 > defines data formats and exchange procedures to standardize=20 > parametrization information exchange into intrusion detection and=20 > response systems from an independent central Manager to any Analyzer.=20 > The IDPEF enables a combination of different (vendor and analyzing=20 > technique) IDS Analyzers under one independent central Manager. A=20 > separate operations of IDS is not longer needed. Base is a new=20 > parametrization methodology where IDS operating parameters=20 > (configurations) are separated in an environmental parametrization=20 > part and a vendor-specific analyzing part. > > This Internet-Draft describes a data model to represent=20 > parametrization information of intrusion detection system entities,=20 > and explains the rationale for using this model. An implementation of=20 > the data model in the Extensible Markup Language (XML) is presented, a = > XML Document Type Definition is developed, and parametrization=20 > examples are provided. From nobody Thu Apr 30 15:47:02 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282861A87EB for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:47:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2YZmeN3-_z56 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:46:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906021A87E4 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:46:49 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=KmEhkvEbp6Yp14jLQxFjT/VwQdSsCKPNZ/hMraSK8Qk53BgqU/uTMsasslbyhSCv; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Cc:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [209.86.224.42] (helo=elwamui-muscovy.atl.sa.earthlink.net) by elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1YnxDr-0002ax-4B; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:46:23 -0400 Received: from 76.254.52.233 by webmail.earthlink.net with HTTP; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:45:57 -0400 Message-ID: <21625111.1430433958137.JavaMail.root@elwamui-muscovy.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:45:57 -0700 (GMT-07:00) From: Randy Presuhn To: "B.-C. Boesch" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: EarthLink Zoo Mail 1.0 X-ELNK-Trace: 4488c18417c9426da92b9037bc8bcf44d4c20f6b8d69d888ff8848a73c44bba04afaf75cf46751e53a20721cf17cf6cf350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 209.86.224.42 Archived-At: Cc: OPSAWG@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Review and contribution requested: draft-boesch-idxp-idpef-01 (Bjoern-C. Boesch) X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Randy Presuhn List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 22:47:01 -0000 Hi - Has there been some discussion of the reasons why this work doesn't emply one of the established management information data modeling languages, such as Yang or SNMP SMI? Randy -----Original Message----- >From: "B.-C. Boesch" >Sent: Apr 29, 2015 7:41 AM >To: saag@ietf.org, sacm@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, OPSAWG@ietf.org, Kathleen Moriarty >Cc: Stephen Farrell >Subject: [OPSAWG] Review and contribution requested: draft-boesch-idxp-idpef-01 (Bjoern-C. Boesch) > >Dear community, > >I have post the attached draft and looking for feedback from people with >security management and / or security (IDS) operations expertise >(including IDS developer). I am particularly interested in your opinions >on the communication proceedings, the parametrization methodology and >the provided attributes (and such I did not think of). If the text needs >updating by your point of view, please let me know that as well. Here is >the link to the new draft: > >http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-boesch-idxp-idpef-01.txt > >At the first view the draft looks very long but after page 44 a lot of >examples and definitions are included for better understanding. So the >first 43 pages are primary in scope for feedback but feedback for the >other pages is welcome, too. > >Abstract > >The Intrusion Detection Parametrization Exchange Format (IDPEF) defines >data formats and exchange procedures to standardize parametrization >information exchange into intrusion detection and response systems from >an independent central Manager to any Analyzer. The IDPEF enables a >combination of different (vendor and analyzing technique) IDS Analyzers >under one independent central Manager. A separate operations of IDS is >not longer needed. Base is a new parametrization methodology where IDS >operating parameters (configurations) are separated in an environmental >parametrization part and a vendor-specific analyzing part. > >This Internet-Draft describes a data model to represent parametrization >information of intrusion detection system entities, and explains the >rationale for using this model. An implementation of the data model in >the Extensible Markup Language (XML) is presented, a XML Document Type >Definition is developed, and parametrization examples are provided. > > > >I am looking forward to your suggestions, feedback, notations, hints, >recommendations, etc. to improve the Internet Draft. Also native speaker >feedback with scope on wording and typo is welcome. > >Kind regards, > >Bjoern-C. > > >_______________________________________________ >OPSAWG mailing list >OPSAWG@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg