From nobody Tue Mar 1 02:00:48 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362E71B3CAE for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 02:00:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H_LY3mo7ie9o for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 02:00:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am1on0773.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe00::773]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 138E51B3C9E for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 02:00:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-btconnect-com; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=A6P17AiwMCST6HsgrueWYlt98UF/TNqPtEGOvk5Nb0U=; b=Fr+JBt8+hsMKmkor1j6Vlyia7PlRYgyN8J8vLw0HgiB2GiEr8uY9X6YxZ1F5pDXe1AR/HC2U9Jnk8x6J7jUmpf/QFdUhJnoq6ZGVKSeqlNPBBb1VJfd70RkeIpelHKUa/Vgf3PzN5BnsbUVrX/xVCCwIqbqPdo870PxJ7BgA0Uw= Authentication-Results: kumari.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;kumari.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=btconnect.com; Received: from pc6 (86.167.153.133) by HE1PR07MB1627.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.166.124.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.415.20; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 10:00:19 +0000 Message-ID: <01eb01d173a0$a43121e0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> From: t.petch To: Warren Kumari , References: Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:55:39 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Originating-IP: [86.167.153.133] X-ClientProxiedBy: AM3PR02CA0027.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.242.240.27) To HE1PR07MB1627.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (25.166.124.23) X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; HE1PR07MB1627; 2:YCfS73ZtSz5R4BWxvO68SnmFO8YDUgea8ywazsnKuJaNQh56h7qJNR1imQPsLWUy90W0ArIVEnHf7fUpmKsY9y6tZ/+hZGa619N3h8RP5fzHu89V0+mgSAiLf/zjt5IqI9jCJs6XoCrSyC270Ni3yQ==; 3:/d4kSB54WcZ7HkOaH1bhmgGTIR2cJAsTXjACPgY5074+I1kGPJFvoU/9JQ2mWsEyOQ8NJE7fGUOVMr+qOc1lgbVYzfFpTIc4d90JaMhIlnvuuj0nQUErKHQIyfRBykl9; 25:snYPgvm3U2nkaLfbzP0d0Md6YI/Na++YJ8O9cwjmORWIeJQ+cD0WO9DeZz9xGlMn2uZ+WHmMCQHp4pUAJM5//l3Gm0n5waJoh6qVpIxmqXh5+/mE3M8WJ2nxhNWwymfl5USJ9k1PaeKCXCKo3f4ysUm7HrS4HzXhq8jt+qP59wW3G0awr8p1Dzymtt3y4CCz+N84ZOE/Hz+X6lnCIAlsIVW/UKZRND8fqJwdcNbkcILiJWuvShFs0kWBTShFieunX1SjjlMDllXZbnBIQogIdXWS89Gq9A4eRY9zdoaZI4NLv/WgyhbOV8OFRDuRA9kDiV02fMcXxAMmtDbRpK4ddQ== X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:HE1PR07MB1627; X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: fb3e048e-e36a-4bf7-63d4-08d341b84c6e X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046); SRVR:HE1PR07MB1627; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:HE1PR07MB1627; X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; HE1PR07MB1627; 4:SE4HqjT4m2CzqlvA0lpaC2L5hV6Cld3CFCWRZubpMl3gBTeSYxaQ6jhnaXsHBPl0qCL0Vujo0TB/jIpTng+KoS5Y1CfwKUHJKcAMBAPwsJk8TjfzC8aaK/Dy9YhikUq9pN1S+1zwgy9JOLGmenWwduzWuWbX3l3iB3V7PDq/pbJrFnglEdnu5vQsk1XAQKY+E23thhm4I2cVJErJFgm0fqgy+tDfear5A8qkLSdKwdykvomf9FAtPWPYC16xuAy0iEzf3oXVwNDr0WGGx3d9KjaWU6EmOUU1p1hViLSr9rR5C5Bzta1aTF4hwDKL09qOv0BvrfaEaXzaW3SQygIfbEqcoTLi4FfjJj/K7IO94ER4RwRfPhvqPMKLmPwKQ6Pp X-Forefront-PRVS: 086831DFB4 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(4630300001)(6009001)(13464003)(164054003)(377454003)(84392002)(81686999)(3846002)(230700001)(586003)(50986999)(76176999)(5820100001)(23676002)(5001770100001)(107886002)(50226001)(2906002)(189998001)(5001960100003)(44736004)(122386002)(1096002)(40100003)(6116002)(50466002)(81816999)(33646002)(61296003)(62236002)(42186005)(19580405001)(5004730100002)(19580395003)(44716002)(92566002)(47776003)(5008740100001)(66066001)(14496001)(77096005)(86362001)(116806002)(15975445007)(81156008)(74416001)(7726001)(4720700001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:HE1PR07MB1627; H:pc6; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: =?utf-8?B?MTtIRTFQUjA3TUIxNjI3OzIzOmFlb2ppamFueGtBcUN3NnNIdy82TUxYTzlv?= =?utf-8?B?dy9PVFBEZmRSaXpya0RSVUdKU1liZk1sT3A4ZDlWZ1VwNzRlN3hQeGJVeVVp?= =?utf-8?B?dDl6TzNPV3ZkN3gzZnJ5bXFWMDBXUTFnQ3JUb0dIaUp1VGRRRi9HUE5KK3Mz?= =?utf-8?B?NFJkdXdSUU1LOSt6eVZ0bFVJajljZDF5aDFGVjM0QWtGYU43WFdTbXg5Wndj?= =?utf-8?B?TUtmTFR2UGdmWnZESjNNclNpRlR3Vk8yVDQvaVlvV1prS092V2V0WWJkbzZn?= =?utf-8?B?eG12alkrSUxhbE1EazFZc0hIWXFqS2E5UkttSlViSVhUSVlDV1NtelRqVFIx?= =?utf-8?B?UFdJQWxFMWZmc0E0SkJweFdBczRHNEZoWWNHZXQ2cTlRQnFlckZjUVdMMWZp?= =?utf-8?B?OUk5WC9Qclhhc3ZpRmU3aTFDUmNuS01UN3hSMm1rY3FPUTVnZVhsbDBGZGVm?= =?utf-8?B?UHdDVHNqWXJsNHVVNm5IbXNYN0gxb0R6ZlFIYXRGVmlwWFROaW5tNnlFUzYy?= =?utf-8?B?dUc2cDhad0czWk11WHFsZjFzOUFzakp4ZmZvV2hzaVkxRVh6bWJxWXo1TFZN?= =?utf-8?B?Z01NUnFJaUlHN3RhSFlDTUVQR3VpR2dmdm03MG9FUEJISktyWERXUmhFNlpy?= =?utf-8?B?TDh2elZMaCtoUUYzdnpoczV1b0R1eFduQnhGdlprbkNMR1p5SzFSMGx6TzVv?= =?utf-8?B?STI0T2JVT0Q2Vzk1TjNUSXREak1nQTBOTG9KcTRkRkI4ZmNUWW0xaTNJVG1n?= =?utf-8?B?c0Z3T3A1TUtyUjNPWDB3VEgveVFpZ05FNFlTNUIvV0dYZDJLYXd4SlY0WEJP?= =?utf-8?B?ZzJqTERpL1VzTW9aUEZJVTVZR2RNUW1LbldLbGRHVFZSMm91c2Z2T05zbHpW?= =?utf-8?B?VmxCdUJZeEFTZFY3QTdxZGNGTHFaSFBYSlQ2S2dGQy9TSzhFbDlGSDJxOWtT?= =?utf-8?B?aG1EYThkcnF0SnBIa2d0aXh4anlzSWJwNUlFUzRjbXdlajBuUnRCdTZFVU0x?= =?utf-8?B?b3ppQWhVSDBFUTNFWDYrNVVBSUFHYnVNZDZGRU13L2FTVWJwak1UYkJybVZv?= =?utf-8?B?Z1hOQllkUy9yM0ZINXZPQi9nYWVkYmg2ZDFrRUZ3amlpNE5YMTE1K0RhQnFK?= =?utf-8?B?WktmeFRkZEtZdThhQWswbm9mNFFKRFBsZ1NXU3VOM1ZaL2N3NEVUTmI1aDNG?= =?utf-8?B?NG1iTFVmbVNIYkZvaU5qekxadmtNNHJlZEgxcHFwcXBORXA2cUxiTTc0cXJB?= =?utf-8?B?aEozVmtpWFQ3VnVtSnVhUFVuUWkrQTNJOG40OHVDRjJIMDhmREhvbnBueXRp?= =?utf-8?B?bmlwNkxpc1UzMmt0Y1o1aXBBZU1haXJaRWZBQXpoVkxoZnBYdGx2MHBTeStt?= =?utf-8?B?S1A3S2tCdTAvM3ZuT2w1b3VHVnVYR005VXFrY2FpQXltREtZTnA3TStWdGRK?= =?utf-8?B?M0pydE55NkoxUXI5K25HanlxWHlUbCtIN0tyZ2hUeE9lNXM1U1Vmbys1N0RV?= =?utf-8?B?TFNQWFk0Y1U2QzNHZXRnbFlyV0JXR1RvWmwwcnVGRi9mK29aVzE4MlhabWhr?= =?utf-8?B?UDQrakRyczE0VWVsSXhuVi9yWWRwTE1iTThnNEVGNWpvU1JQUkJOK0tIQ2dP?= =?utf-8?B?WVlzVlEwRzBZOWg4T0dNRGlWZUJWYmdHbDA5R05ad05vWGJsdmdJZURpYld6?= =?utf-8?Q?ZdmwEGWRV62aNBseRQ=3D?= X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; HE1PR07MB1627; 5:+YE0Vh8D1ItTbzzO/P/dnHM73jSRji4CuwPs16ZPsZ62MrLpsIryZtxDfTXFQ3GZ/44kLOdhlnR+CCAyyClZV0VNzEVAyXrqy1DmfHdX0BHnWw5ECBmx2O/IEkS3vigO0fJiqzEjSw8dHoz5g2/IiA==; 24:oF2lhxzXCKVyOqWN63Ga55PQ9i5nag2eKQ0QOEmoS59g0hTXuSYYmv7d/a9OYQNrjp6OTG4Xj4L7OZX98akIZ3LZ8XQk/bMjbblRVDhCr5s= SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:23 SpamDiagnosticMetadata: NSPM X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Mar 2016 10:00:19.9118 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR07MB1627 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Detangling TACACS+ - the outcome X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 10:00:45 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Warren Kumari" To: Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 12:46 AM > 2: After the WG has agreed to the above text, the plan is to produce a new, > Standards Track document which describes TACACS+ with the additions / > enhancements. Please noodle on the name for this new and improved protocol > - I'm partial to TACACS++, but that may be overly cute. How about TACACS+S or TACACSS+ Tom Petch > > Thanks, > Scott, Tianran and Warren > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > OPSAWG@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > From nobody Tue Mar 1 03:38:56 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314BC1A1A52 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 03:38:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.906 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dt5M7ookJbA0 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 03:38:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B7A31A1B1E for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 03:38:54 -0800 (PST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2D0AQCrv9RW/xUHmMZeGQEBAQEPAQEBAYJfK1JtBrpmAQ2BZyGFcgKBOzgUAQEBAQEBAWQnhEEBAQEBAxILHUsEAgEIDQQEAQELFAkHMhQJCAEBBAESCBMHh30BDaZJmS0BAQEBAQEBAwEBAQEBAQEBAQESBIYThDmENYMrgQ8FlwwBhViJZ4REgxmFOY5KHgEBQoNkaodFAX0BAQE X-IPAS-Result: A2D0AQCrv9RW/xUHmMZeGQEBAQEPAQEBAYJfK1JtBrpmAQ2BZyGFcgKBOzgUAQEBAQEBAWQnhEEBAQEBAxILHUsEAgEIDQQEAQELFAkHMhQJCAEBBAESCBMHh30BDaZJmS0BAQEBAQEBAwEBAQEBAQEBAQESBIYThDmENYMrgQ8FlwwBhViJZ4REgxmFOY5KHgEBQoNkaodFAX0BAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,521,1449550800"; d="scan'208";a="144757417" Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest-exch.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.21]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 01 Mar 2016 06:38:50 -0500 X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1 Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC04.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.14]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 01 Mar 2016 06:38:49 -0500 Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC04.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.14]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 12:38:47 +0100 From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" To: Zhoutianran , "opsawg@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires Thread-Index: AdFzWApUxZoyzCGZR2WickFNLOEKMQAVpQZg Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 11:38:47 +0000 Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BF733DA@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.47] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 11:38:56 -0000 Hi, I would like to request a slot in the OPSAWG meeting to present the 'proble= m scope of automatic attachment of end stations and network devices to a ne= twork'. We have submitted an Internet-Draft which describes the problem and= one possible solution - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-unbehagen-l= ldp-spb.=20 Thanks and Regards, Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Zhoutianran > Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 3:18 AM > To: opsawg@ietf.org > Subject: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires >=20 > Greetings WG, >=20 > Our meeting in Buenos Aires is fast approaching. We have requested a slot > for the joint OpsAWG / OpsArea meeting. >=20 > Please send over requests for agenda time. >=20 > Please remember that we give time to drafts that have already received > significant discussion on list. >=20 >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Scott, Warren & Tianran >=20 From nobody Tue Mar 1 04:08:56 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A5B1A8996 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 04:08:53 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.507 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n7gQhIdIyuXt for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 04:08:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92B8B1A89F2 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 04:08:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3210; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1456834131; x=1458043731; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=FwsZit8pBVddUN9wq15K3x0uiJg7JH8wXnlNhhOY2FI=; b=elSRwPvs2XOGFrNsGx+21HvdMnDxSyw0Da/qgIryO2/3B4L7PfVt7j/4 l3/pQ8OhTDOxdFp5fuUF2dU24wDe1Fp5zbzcDhIqLHBCwD4lFbn6jqG8G BMpV2yfd4s9vykoipDrx3aCVtRy+LZEcgUDiAGLPLwolPg4LXTc+NJp7Z 8=; X-Files: signature.asc : 481 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CuBAB8hdVW/xbLJq1ehAxtvCAXCoUoS?= =?us-ascii?q?gKCDgEBAQEBAWUnhEEBAQEEAQEBGgZLCg0ECxEEAQEBCRYIAwICCQMCAQIBFR8?= =?us-ascii?q?JCAYBDAYCAQEXiAQOsE6PGAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBDgQEikyHNYE6A?= =?us-ascii?q?QSHXI8ygwmBZGxrhx6BYIREgwKFUI5MYoNlOy6ITAEBAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,523,1449532800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="635822731" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Mar 2016 12:08:49 +0000 Received: from [10.61.246.67] ([10.61.246.67]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u21C8n74023054; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 12:08:49 GMT To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" , Zhoutianran , "opsawg@ietf.org" References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BF733DA@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> From: Eliot Lear Message-ID: <56D58650.7000301@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 13:08:48 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BF733DA@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="L6bmdKbI5jqKu39vBS5k9AOKvnPbd6MVx" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 12:08:54 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --L6bmdKbI5jqKu39vBS5k9AOKvnPbd6MVx Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="TbBowWGShHoBcPsnajJ4w1x8oCUTXHbkA" From: Eliot Lear To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" , Zhoutianran , "opsawg@ietf.org" Message-ID: <56D58650.7000301@cisco.com> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BF733DA@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BF733DA@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> --TbBowWGShHoBcPsnajJ4w1x8oCUTXHbkA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I very much look forward to Dan's talk. I also have requested a session from the chairs to talk about Manufacturer Usage Descriptions (MUD) a means by which manufacturers can inform the network of recommended policies for their devices. To do all of this we will make use of a bunch of existing work (including YANG, certs, DHCP, and LLDP), with only comparatively small extensions. About 15 minutes. Eliot On 3/1/16 12:38 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to request a slot in the OPSAWG meeting to present the 'pr= oblem scope of automatic attachment of end stations and network devices t= o a network'. We have submitted an Internet-Draft which describes the pro= blem and one possible solution - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-u= nbehagen-lldp-spb.=20 > > Thanks and Regards, > > Dan > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> Zhoutianran >> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 3:18 AM >> To: opsawg@ietf.org >> Subject: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires >> >> Greetings WG, >> >> Our meeting in Buenos Aires is fast approaching. We have requested a s= lot >> for the joint OpsAWG / OpsArea meeting. >> >> Please send over requests for agenda time. >> >> Please remember that we give time to drafts that have already received= >> significant discussion on list. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Scott, Warren & Tianran >> > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > OPSAWG@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > --TbBowWGShHoBcPsnajJ4w1x8oCUTXHbkA-- --L6bmdKbI5jqKu39vBS5k9AOKvnPbd6MVx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW1YZQAAoJEIe2a0bZ0noz2MQH/iAK4gznVtdbebxJX6Ce0W2x j3IdwEu29YqVXjfH8KuHbiVa+2jTB5slDBrhiRijD2eQOz9S626YTRDVGVLuAHz5 jQBC0ggvSDF/06FrG4ySfrtiOs3duA6W4Mqst6CMzjYn+BAbSEUGlOt2cMmeFESI avQ7TenRi+OjZb5rdIw4Y5YL+uE+4CG42r7nykP4dIyichJHE30Ln/FZ+mF9CgAf eHGXXHjlfsbrSbABZhmTn1O2dMBqRAFLDvrbQeWl+t+RPYdQRRxa5Ru8YMJ/RI8C yZZKgKzISRfAvzhtkcrJB5xRfxTCwYZ1HDgcWTOnVw3mgr4+NBUjl6Xo7KhzOhk= =fK+x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --L6bmdKbI5jqKu39vBS5k9AOKvnPbd6MVx-- From nobody Tue Mar 1 08:35:06 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70ED1B2EC6 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 08:35:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.906 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HWFjEMEqiNCy for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 08:35:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 409AD1B2EBC for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 08:35:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mb-2.local (c-73-158-58-32.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.158.58.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u21GYxG1046214 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 1 Mar 2016 16:35:00 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com) To: Warren Kumari , "opsawg@ietf.org" References: From: joel jaeggli Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 08:34:51 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XUFvM4qgMK71djsjEEsqAd8GcljPVBjBs" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Detangling TACACS+ - the outcome X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 16:35:03 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --XUFvM4qgMK71djsjEEsqAd8GcljPVBjBs Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="q7QnF90cCNdF9O6KsJwAmVRU6AkwrAIk0" From: joel jaeggli To: Warren Kumari , "opsawg@ietf.org" Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Detangling TACACS+ - the outcome References: In-Reply-To: --q7QnF90cCNdF9O6KsJwAmVRU6AkwrAIk0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2/29/16 4:46 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > Dear OpsAWG, > Thank you for your time and patience during this process. We note that > we now have all IPR ACKs. >=20 > Based upon the responses we have decided on a path forward: > 1: Produce an informational document which documents the TACACS+ > protocol as it stands today (as best as we can). >=20 > 2: After the WG has agreed to the above text, the plan is to produce a > new, Standards Track document which describes TACACS+ with the addition= s > / enhancements. Please noodle on the name for this new and improved > protocol - I'm partial to TACACS++, but that may be overly cute. >=20 > Thanks, > Scott, Tianran and Warren Thank you guys for your dilligent efforts at teasing this appart. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > OPSAWG@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg >=20 --q7QnF90cCNdF9O6KsJwAmVRU6AkwrAIk0-- --XUFvM4qgMK71djsjEEsqAd8GcljPVBjBs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAlbVxKwACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrKZvACeKl4w22PXmWWJXIB9A/JhdJBa 3GQAn2WjVU1jojdoWHmcMaP9/ncS6Fmk =sOIC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XUFvM4qgMK71djsjEEsqAd8GcljPVBjBs-- From nobody Tue Mar 1 09:20:58 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D2B1B3007 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:20:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.277 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, GB_I_INVITATION=-2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kzHuVtIxf5uw for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:20:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-yw0-x231.google.com (mail-yw0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A417C1B2F69 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:20:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yw0-x231.google.com with SMTP id g127so154618095ywf.2 for ; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 09:20:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=3RxWcmoNLHkAFB1lTNdiVx6CmXJcWZIghN37o/r7ShI=; b=OOFpp7cdcjtDleveCSWOjwazqy+Ck/6UTqVWXyl4uy8AFzgWxauN5LSycb1vzf2fLv ce7qCpawjEE2neD+8G9nazsMGzQqeHkklexrClkSfjckRUinvLM3LErD9GkiLU//aqE5 86s7VCYT549jFDpnSTkPgL6Ns1n384AsNO3cbPvswLg/Qnr1Cgo00WusZD5V4bhaBU8+ WwSa52eTmhQCBFFmjxBThkBv6fJBlDBlalFDTRTQ5b3CPXxYfydVJxlnfzw424/Pb9y0 Cuv7Wy76q4/HAHJo0B1T/I/GwNGQQtULLzdt1xo9OasXptlivxmxqCEcVVEXa7J+xCka AHWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=3RxWcmoNLHkAFB1lTNdiVx6CmXJcWZIghN37o/r7ShI=; b=j6iJC14IvZNzLViSQ9ZBU3+WqrZDs/Msfhi05NTY2dUSIbJPz2bslihAqEUJQdCk8C WjObVHeKjINwEFOMSiv98DdPZ/2QsbzCKcKwBOJGOFNoTpyna5y//C2uHwL366Vb0Ruy d9P78tEJbiakdKXpImm8bHiJbFMein30DIVCBN37hgr2dQzOFA+VuYysAp0ilmp/yGXG M7qzZd5xzgmoDPfCRN5Wpu2NQ3PSbX/e1OYg8IzZ37uG405tGcKS7tcgnEHqlSW+Rqc8 rLLofrbIqfDNfLHnqDzJTaJzGq3K12riykG7Y67iKt6no0nESM8MwL8ADnFAv0+tmAs1 tYgg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLv0X+F/DNBO5E3zaYwMIYD0ncVRLp7bjs5oD/FPVoS0KJ3PK9MBpdKRf2nKxBIwFj9/yovYuLK9NzNNPJR X-Received: by 10.13.231.132 with SMTP id q126mr12201682ywe.203.1456852853762; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 09:20:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Warren Kumari Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 17:20:44 +0000 Message-ID: To: "opsawg@ietf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c088c1ed6db4d052cfffcb8 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Detangling TACACS+ - the outcome X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 17:20:56 -0000 --94eb2c088c1ed6db4d052cfffcb8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 7:46 PM Warren Kumari wrote: > Dear OpsAWG, > Thank you for your time and patience during this process. We note that we > now have all IPR ACKs. > > Based upon the responses we have decided on a path forward: > 1: Produce an informational document which documents the TACACS+ protocol > as it stands today (as best as we can). > > 2: After the WG has agreed to the above text, the plan is to produce a > new, Standards Track document which describes TACACS+ with the additions / > enhancements. Please noodle on the name for this new and improved protocol > - I'm partial to TACACS++, but that may be overly cute. > I may not have been sufficiently clear on #2 - the additions / enhancements will things like improving the security and necessary fixups. This is not an invitation to re-architect the TACACS protocol / turn it into something it ain't. W > > Thanks, > Scott, Tianran and Warren > --94eb2c088c1ed6db4d052cfffcb8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Mon= , Feb 29, 2016 at 7:46 PM Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
Dear OpsAWG,
Thank you for your time and patience = during this process. We note that we now have all IPR ACKs.
<= br>
Based upon the responses we have decided on a path forward:
1: Produce an informational document which documents the TACACS+ p= rotocol as it stands today (as best as we can).

2:= After the WG has agreed to the above text, the plan is to produce a new, S= tandards Track document which describes TACACS+ with the additions / enhanc= ements. Please noodle on the name for this new and improved protocol - I= 9;m partial to TACACS++, but that may be overly cute.

I may not have been sufficiently clear on #2 - the a= dditions / enhancements will things like improving the security and necessa= ry fixups. This is not an invitation to re-architect the TACACS protocol / = turn it into something it ain't.=C2=A0

W
=
=C2=A0

<= /div>
Thanks,
Scott, Tianran and Warren
--94eb2c088c1ed6db4d052cfffcb8-- From nobody Tue Mar 1 10:32:51 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822421B30F7 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 10:32:49 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.906 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, GB_I_INVITATION=-2, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3kTtrGDWjKUD for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 10:32:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E940A1B38EB for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 10:32:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mb-2.local ([IPv6:2601:647:4204:51:dc7d:397d:bc0:b5da]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u21IWkqk047219 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 1 Mar 2016 18:32:47 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com) To: Warren Kumari , "opsawg@ietf.org" References: From: joel jaeggli Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 10:32:46 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cg854s0hefrirNwcgIo7b4RI8NtG5kHlk" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Detangling TACACS+ - the outcome X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:32:49 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --cg854s0hefrirNwcgIo7b4RI8NtG5kHlk Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="o9aX7RjFXlh5ph2ORMs9JOngg9OVJl7lt" From: joel jaeggli To: Warren Kumari , "opsawg@ietf.org" Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Detangling TACACS+ - the outcome References: In-Reply-To: --o9aX7RjFXlh5ph2ORMs9JOngg9OVJl7lt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 3/1/16 9:20 AM, Warren Kumari wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 7:46 PM Warren Kumari > wrote: >=20 > Dear OpsAWG, > Thank you for your time and patience during this process. We note > that we now have all IPR ACKs. >=20 > Based upon the responses we have decided on a path forward: > 1: Produce an informational document which documents the TACACS+ > protocol as it stands today (as best as we can). >=20 > 2: After the WG has agreed to the above text, the plan is to produc= e > a new, Standards Track document which describes TACACS+ with the > additions / enhancements. Please noodle on the name for this new an= d > improved protocol - I'm partial to TACACS++, but that may be overly= > cute. >=20 >=20 > I may not have been sufficiently clear on #2 - the additions / > enhancements will things like improving the security and necessary > fixups. This is not an invitation to re-architect the TACACS protocol /= > turn it into something it ain't.=20 +1 > W > =20 >=20 >=20 > Thanks, > Scott, Tianran and Warren >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > OPSAWG@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg >=20 --o9aX7RjFXlh5ph2ORMs9JOngg9OVJl7lt-- --cg854s0hefrirNwcgIo7b4RI8NtG5kHlk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAlbV4E4ACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrJ8kQCfWE4RYsUOv1Fq4fqwiz2rHoUE HS0AnRAMPHaLY09pKNYWWj5lrn4M6VGv =d6vw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cg854s0hefrirNwcgIo7b4RI8NtG5kHlk-- From nobody Tue Mar 1 23:05:23 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77FC01A1C06 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 23:05:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.358 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.358 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=1.543, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0XE9-PTSa0Zl for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 23:05:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [IPv6:2001:67c:27e4::14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 772241A1C03 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 23:05:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.3.107] (unknown [181.165.125.191]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99C2B80787; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 08:05:15 +0100 (CET) To: Zhoutianran , "opsawg@ietf.org" References: From: Fernando Gont X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56D6258F.8030104@si6networks.com> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 20:28:15 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 07:05:22 -0000 Folks, We'd like a slot to discuss this I-D: Title: "On Firewalls in Network Security" Filename: draft-gont-opsawg-firewalls-analysis Presenter: Fernando Gont Slot: 20'? Thanks! Best regards, Fernando On 02/29/2016 10:17 PM, Zhoutianran wrote: > Greetings WG, > > Our meeting in Buenos Aires is fast approaching. We have requested a slot for the joint OpsAWG / OpsArea meeting. > > Please send over requests for agenda time. > > Please remember that we give time to drafts that have already received significant discussion on list. > > > Thanks, > > Scott, Warren & Tianran > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > OPSAWG@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 From nobody Wed Mar 2 09:16:21 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E701B2CC2; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 09:16:18 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.906 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sBTDr8SYLPoN; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 09:16:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 321331B2CA4; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 09:16:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mb-2.local ([8.18.217.194]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u22HG3px055226 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:16:04 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com) To: Fernando Gont , Zhoutianran , "opsawg@ietf.org" , "opsec@ietf.org" References: <56D6258F.8030104@si6networks.com> From: joel jaeggli Message-ID: <4ace042c-ddc8-5d29-bc1e-2c270ad4a6b2@bogus.com> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 09:16:02 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56D6258F.8030104@si6networks.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KrWJMLNV5iHQLk1bIXbQQuL99817oGG3d" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 17:16:18 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --KrWJMLNV5iHQLk1bIXbQQuL99817oGG3d Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="mp75S2t3d2aM3npmdMkW7mIbdbTdGTeFW" From: joel jaeggli To: Fernando Gont , Zhoutianran , "opsawg@ietf.org" , "opsec@ietf.org" Message-ID: <4ace042c-ddc8-5d29-bc1e-2c270ad4a6b2@bogus.com> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires References: <56D6258F.8030104@si6networks.com> In-Reply-To: <56D6258F.8030104@si6networks.com> --mp75S2t3d2aM3npmdMkW7mIbdbTdGTeFW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable opsec? On 3/1/16 3:28 PM, Fernando Gont wrote: > Folks, >=20 > We'd like a slot to discuss this I-D: >=20 > Title: "On Firewalls in Network Security" > Filename: draft-gont-opsawg-firewalls-analysis > Presenter: Fernando Gont > Slot: 20'? >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > Best regards, > Fernando >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 02/29/2016 10:17 PM, Zhoutianran wrote: >> Greetings WG, >> >> Our meeting in Buenos Aires is fast approaching. We have requested a s= lot for the joint OpsAWG / OpsArea meeting. >> >> Please send over requests for agenda time.=20 >> >> Please remember that we give time to drafts that have already received= significant discussion on list. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Scott, Warren & Tianran >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OPSAWG mailing list >> OPSAWG@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg >> >=20 >=20 --mp75S2t3d2aM3npmdMkW7mIbdbTdGTeFW-- --KrWJMLNV5iHQLk1bIXbQQuL99817oGG3d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAlbXH9MACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrJPyQCfVlMkt1xoXMEf0iByIuhV9rQH e50An2z4WAPDVWkWE1PX7D32M2ADfscy =Mjwc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KrWJMLNV5iHQLk1bIXbQQuL99817oGG3d-- From nobody Thu Mar 3 01:19:52 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841521A6FB2; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 01:19:50 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YJsY5MqpDKYA; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 01:19:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpgre-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 333A81A6FA6; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 01:19:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from fr711umx2.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.210.39]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 02E703B7157C; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 09:19:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.122]) by fr711umx2.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO-o) with ESMTP id u239JjvE019106 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 3 Mar 2016 09:19:45 GMT Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u239Ja2x005299 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 3 Mar 2016 10:19:44 +0100 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA06.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.2.137]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 10:19:42 +0100 From: "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE)" To: joel jaeggli , Fernando Gont , Zhoutianran , "opsawg@ietf.org" , "opsec@ietf.org" , "fred@cisco.com" Thread-Topic: [OPSEC] [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires Thread-Index: AQHRdKdI1qHGZVPVxke2BTBf8BEn4J9HclIA Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 09:19:41 +0000 Message-ID: References: <56D6258F.8030104@si6networks.com> <4ace042c-ddc8-5d29-bc1e-2c270ad4a6b2@bogus.com> In-Reply-To: <4ace042c-ddc8-5d29-bc1e-2c270ad4a6b2@bogus.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.38] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <4DF1C0D354975740AF118D4E3619E990@exchange.lucent.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [OPSEC] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 09:19:50 -0000 WWVzLCBjb250ZW50IGlzIHN1YmplY3Qgd2l0aGluIHRoZSBPUFNFQyByZWFsbSBpbmRlZWQuDQpJ 4oCZbSBvayB0byBnaXZlIHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgYSBwbGFjZSBvbiB0aGUgT1BTRUMgSUVURjk1 IGFnZW5kYS4NCg0KRmVybmFuZG8sIHdpbGwgeW91IGRlbGl2ZXIgdGhlIHNsb3Qgb3Igd2lsbCBG cmVkPw0KDQpHLw0KDQoNCg0KDQpPbiAwMi8wMy8xNiAxODoxNiwgIk9QU0VDIG9uIGJlaGFsZiBv ZiBqb2VsIGphZWdnbGkiIDxvcHNlYy1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnIG9uIGJlaGFsZiBvZiBqb2Vs amFAYm9ndXMuY29tPiB3cm90ZToNCg0KPm9wc2VjPw0KPg0KPg0KPk9uIDMvMS8xNiAzOjI4IFBN LCBGZXJuYW5kbyBHb250IHdyb3RlOg0KPj4gRm9sa3MsDQo+PiANCj4+IFdlJ2QgbGlrZSBhIHNs b3QgdG8gZGlzY3VzcyB0aGlzIEktRDoNCj4+IA0KPj4gVGl0bGU6ICJPbiBGaXJld2FsbHMgaW4g TmV0d29yayBTZWN1cml0eSINCj4+IEZpbGVuYW1lOiBkcmFmdC1nb250LW9wc2F3Zy1maXJld2Fs bHMtYW5hbHlzaXMNCj4+IFByZXNlbnRlcjogRmVybmFuZG8gR29udA0KPj4gU2xvdDogMjAnPw0K Pj4gDQo+PiBUaGFua3MhDQo+PiANCj4+IEJlc3QgcmVnYXJkcywNCj4+IEZlcm5hbmRvDQo+PiAN Cj4+IA0KPj4gDQo+PiANCj4+IE9uIDAyLzI5LzIwMTYgMTA6MTcgUE0sIFpob3V0aWFucmFuIHdy b3RlOg0KPj4+IEdyZWV0aW5ncyBXRywNCj4+Pg0KPj4+IE91ciBtZWV0aW5nIGluIEJ1ZW5vcyBB aXJlcyBpcyBmYXN0IGFwcHJvYWNoaW5nLiBXZSBoYXZlIHJlcXVlc3RlZCBhIHNsb3QgZm9yIHRo ZSBqb2ludCBPcHNBV0cgLyBPcHNBcmVhIG1lZXRpbmcuDQo+Pj4NCj4+PiBQbGVhc2Ugc2VuZCBv dmVyIHJlcXVlc3RzIGZvciBhZ2VuZGEgdGltZS4gDQo+Pj4NCj4+PiBQbGVhc2UgcmVtZW1iZXIg dGhhdCB3ZSBnaXZlIHRpbWUgdG8gZHJhZnRzIHRoYXQgaGF2ZSBhbHJlYWR5IHJlY2VpdmVkIHNp Z25pZmljYW50IGRpc2N1c3Npb24gb24gbGlzdC4NCj4+Pg0KPj4+DQo+Pj4gVGhhbmtzLA0KPj4+ DQo+Pj4gU2NvdHQsIFdhcnJlbiAmIFRpYW5yYW4NCj4+Pg0KPj4+IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQo+Pj4gT1BTQVdHIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0K Pj4+IE9QU0FXR0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KPj4+IGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlz dGluZm8vb3BzYXdnDQo+Pj4NCj4+IA0KPj4gDQo+DQo+DQo= From nobody Thu Mar 3 02:47:03 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0481A8984; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 02:47:01 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oR8vVH7Bmfjk; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 02:46:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 747491A8981; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 02:46:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.54.138.136] (unknown [88.128.81.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32759803B5; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:46:53 +0100 (CET) To: "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE)" , joel jaeggli , Zhoutianran , "opsawg@ietf.org" , "opsec@ietf.org" , "fred@cisco.com" References: <56D6258F.8030104@si6networks.com> <4ace042c-ddc8-5d29-bc1e-2c270ad4a6b2@bogus.com> From: Fernando Gont X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56D81532.4070102@si6networks.com> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 07:42:58 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [OPSEC] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 10:47:01 -0000 Folks, I'm fine with presenting this in opsec -- the reason we were "targeting" opsawg was because Fred's early document on firewalls was target and adoped on such wg. I guess it might make sense to also give a short preso in opsawg to let the wg how we updated the document in response to the comments from the last meeting... but that's upto the ads/wg chairs. Regarding the presentation in opsec, here's the info: Title: "On Firewalls in Network Security" Filename: draft-gont-opsawg-firewalls-analysis Presenter: Fernando Gont Slot: 20'? I'll check with Fred if he'll be there too. Thanks! Cheers, Fernando On 03/03/2016 06:19 AM, Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE) wrote: > Yes, content is subject within the OPSEC realm indeed. > I’m ok to give this document a place on the OPSEC IETF95 agenda. > > Fernando, will you deliver the slot or will Fred? > > G/ > > > > > On 02/03/16 18:16, "OPSEC on behalf of joel jaeggli" wrote: > >> opsec? >> >> >> On 3/1/16 3:28 PM, Fernando Gont wrote: >>> Folks, >>> >>> We'd like a slot to discuss this I-D: >>> >>> Title: "On Firewalls in Network Security" >>> Filename: draft-gont-opsawg-firewalls-analysis >>> Presenter: Fernando Gont >>> Slot: 20'? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Fernando >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 02/29/2016 10:17 PM, Zhoutianran wrote: >>>> Greetings WG, >>>> >>>> Our meeting in Buenos Aires is fast approaching. We have requested a slot for the joint OpsAWG / OpsArea meeting. >>>> >>>> Please send over requests for agenda time. >>>> >>>> Please remember that we give time to drafts that have already received significant discussion on list. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Scott, Warren & Tianran >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> OPSAWG mailing list >>>> OPSAWG@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg >>>> >>> >>> >> >> -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 From nobody Thu Mar 3 11:33:09 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietf.org Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1324F1B41B5; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:33:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "\"IETF Meeting Session Request Tool\"" To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.15.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160303193306.28821.26451.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 11:33:06 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: opsawg@ietf.org, opsawg-chairs@ietf.org, smccammon@amsl.com Subject: [OPSAWG] opsawg - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF 95 X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 19:33:06 -0000 An update to a meeting session request has just been submitted by Stephanie McCammon, on behalf of the opsawg working group. --------------------------------------------------------- Working Group Name: Operations and Management Area Working Group Area Name: Operations and Management Area Session Requester: Stephanie McCammon Number of Sessions: 1 Length of Session(s): 2 Hours Number of Attendees: 100 Conflicts to Avoid: First Priority: capport dane dprive Second Priority: dnsop v6ops Special Requests: PLEASE NOTE: Combined OpsAWG / OpsAREA. Feel free to merge / cancel / whatever. --------------------------------------------------------- From nobody Tue Mar 8 23:40:35 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietf.org Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FB512DF22; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 23:40:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.15.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160309074032.16697.22972.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 23:40:32 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-01.txt X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 07:40:32 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group of the IETF. Title : The TACACS+ Protocol Authors : Thorsten Dahm Andrej Ota Douglas C. Medway Gash David Carrel Lol Grant Filename : draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-01.txt Pages : 35 Date : 2016-03-08 Abstract: TACACS+ provides Device Administration for routers, network access servers and other networked computing devices via one or more centralized servers. This document describes the protocol that is used by TACACS+. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Fri Mar 11 15:06:10 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietf.org Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F1012DD95; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:05:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "\"IETF Secretariat\"" To: , X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.16.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160311230527.15028.59274.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:05:27 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG] opsawg - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 95 X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 23:05:28 -0000 Dear Warren Kumari, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled. Below is the scheduled session information followed by the original request. opsawg Session 1 (2:00:00) Wednesday, Afternoon Session I 1400-1600 Room Name: Pacifico A size: 300 --------------------------------------------- Special Note: Combined with OPSAREA Request Information: --------------------------------------------------------- Working Group Name: Operations and Management Area Working Group Area Name: Operations and Management Area Session Requester: Warren Kumari Number of Sessions: 1 Length of Session(s): 2 Hours Number of Attendees: 100 Conflicts to Avoid: First Priority: capport dane dprive Second Priority: dnsop v6ops Special Requests: PLEASE NOTE: Combined OpsAWG / OpsAREA. Feel free to merge / cancel / whatever. --------------------------------------------------------- From nobody Tue Mar 15 00:09:58 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4FBF12D8B3 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:09:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38MmY836xbzP for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:09:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yw0-x22a.google.com (mail-yw0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7634612D85E for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:09:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id h129so10037196ywb.1 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:09:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=x+zInyJmWpnzPXsd8/PQ2b9KGS/3SIA/6FUc4kGgxlM=; b=oVzh6jGU0MVWHfCVzJIoVXnCAjkKPwTYz+b3wv2ilQI+6fID/1nohVDN0QzPj98i0K EnqdACO1a1Yo6PtT0L3XJ/5n5ESDOalOA1uPvzfm+yCoTiKoG5W+Df3ABSz3vSmQ/eDL 5n94VBjMTXWxWHLPDhapbMdbwYdJKZczb6QTRxveuUbgV3xV8S/WgVSF5lxrFrEr88BR o6TsbUGHLYSCpglkfJXCgJaNFhZ4U5ckwqc6gXdk13ovPnACpZxH+ut6VfjWndehovao vkqiI/xYMX+Z5jn34pf35arfUSGqLEdEPnVvK0YVlCM9/ay+zlSC85fWsYKq9I+SvZvj UyDw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=x+zInyJmWpnzPXsd8/PQ2b9KGS/3SIA/6FUc4kGgxlM=; b=aumFa0qomcdwlbrF+DSeWHvWtmP9A1cQgj9Cv1WPuSeW82+n7LKsMmIq0T2gyhNqrt W3aauVK9HPRJLttVWywUqog3vFSUZP0vmG7hf3SfoXxeDYW3GX4vQJjfXQvqiCZZy3Yi Igafe5NZbZTOiuzAG3ky+Yq4csykH6JNWb3XOhieV4TEOL+Cx6VA4NrB48mSBkN25g9d PdOhNHyO2e2zYjGUY6KDJFDENH17TgnBc9ODke6ysRcdnypQwIxxxuhUJX31zEYX63Bd tj7fE/lQWq8g23wnfZsJHBXCTr18INxA+Nu7p99QyeJFaUKBioJGVgfc8fLic9FwJ1FH DhqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJOJXhSRA9HNOyleHasbaMfpQkbBSi9bpZbF5d3dUN7M9451HWlPaHPu8zh6OATiBZFtB3CQpDXET8jtYbE X-Received: by 10.13.210.67 with SMTP id u64mr13867405ywd.42.1458025794549; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:09:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Warren Kumari Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:09:44 +0000 Message-ID: To: "opsawg@ietf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114e7e308eee04052e111583 Archived-At: Subject: [OPSAWG] Please review draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-01 X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:09:57 -0000 --001a114e7e308eee04052e111583 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi y'all, The authors of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs have updated as requested. This is intended to be the *informational* document which describes how TACACS+ works today. The WG asked for it -- now the WG has it. Please please review it and provide constructive comments, preferable with text. W --001a114e7e308eee04052e111583 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi y'all,

The authors of=C2=A0draft= -ietf-opsawg-tacacs have updated as requested. This is intended to be the *= informational* document which describes how TACACS+ works today.=C2=A0
<= /div>

The WG asked for it -- now the WG has it. Please p= lease review it and provide constructive comments, preferable with text.

W
--001a114e7e308eee04052e111583-- From nobody Wed Mar 16 17:10:00 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietf.org Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D43512D794; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:09:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Benoit Claise" To: "The IESG" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.17.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160317000956.513.18228.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:09:56 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: opsawg-chairs@ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new-04: (with COMMENT) X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:09:56 -0000 Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- While it certainly passes compilation, the MIB module doesn't display nicely. Ex: usmHMAC128SHA224AuthProtocol OBJECT-IDENTITY STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The Authentication Protocol usmHMAC128SHA224AuthProtocol uses HMAC-SHA-224 and truncates output to 128 bits." REFERENCE "- Krawczyk, H., Bellare, M., and R. Canetti, HMAC: Keyed-Hashing for Message Authentication, RFC 2104. - National Institute of Standards and Technology, Secure Hash Standard (SHS), FIPS PUB 180-4, 2012." ::= { snmpAuthProtocols 4 } Please fix this before submitting. From nobody Thu Mar 17 04:49:33 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E3012D566; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 04:49:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mScGijoglRSE; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 04:49:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (smtprelay.restena.lu [158.64.1.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7002A12D525; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 04:49:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aragorn.restena.lu (aragorn.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8::155]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDDA543AE8; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:49:26 +0100 (CET) To: IETF OOPSAWG , IETF OPSEC From: Stefan Winter Openpgp: id=AD3091F3AB24E05F4F722C03C0DE6A358A39DC66; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 Message-ID: <56EA99C6.2080600@restena.lu> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:49:26 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6vTkxpWimfBruok3Mm49lgL7jaDpKdkUx" Archived-At: Subject: [OPSAWG] leaf device network configuration format (was draft-winter-opsawg-eap-metadata) X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:49:31 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --6vTkxpWimfBruok3Mm49lgL7jaDpKdkUx Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="oQWURxkrA5Q2KXe1icLfNl5ih9mPm3WfI" From: Stefan Winter To: IETF OOPSAWG , IETF OPSEC Message-ID: <56EA99C6.2080600@restena.lu> Subject: leaf device network configuration format (was draft-winter-opsawg-eap-metadata) --oQWURxkrA5Q2KXe1icLfNl5ih9mPm3WfI Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------070902090005070801090009" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070902090005070801090009 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, over the past few IETFs, I talked about draft-winter-opsawg-eap-metadata.= In a nutshell: end users get EAP configuration wrong because it's too complex, and as a result they are vulnerable to many badnesses out there in the Wi-Fi world. A common config format would settle all the complex pieces automatically for them, and make the internet a safer place for th= em. I got many good comments on the mic regarding the draft. I recall Hannes Tschofenig commenting that the scope should be larger than EAP properties: it should also configure the actual network context around the EAP credentials, namely the SSID etc., along with its various properties to fully configure (encryption level...). Phillip Hallam-Baker commented that the file format should be usable across all kinds of devices, like a smartwatch, for those devices do not have a good UI to configure manually. I've factored in all this and am going to submit a draft with a new name just before the cut-off (when else :-) ). It's probably going to be draft-winter-opsec-netconfig-metadata-00 because I believe that opsec is the better place to discuss this: it has an operations dimension - config needs to be moved around - but it also has a security dimension because failure to get a good config may make it appear like things work, while actually putting users at risk (e.g. if server certs are not checked while they should be). With the previous, EAP-only approach we already have very good results in our EAP-based Wi-Fi roaming consortium eduroam: there's an Android app that can consume the settings, and it makes the security posture change from Android's default "don't validate, don't bother user, just send password" to the gold-standard "validate cert chain, server name, pin EAP method". People are using it, and happily so (within the limitations of Android; talk to me for anecdotes :-) ). There is also a Linux app that can consume the same file format. With the expansion of scope to actual network defs, the file format becomes much more useful, and I believe this has a real chance of becoming more wide-spread. So, even though I haven't been to opsec before - I'd like to request a meeting slot for IETF95 there to discuss this new draft. All this with the hope for WG adoption of course :-) Please let me know if it's possible to allocate, say, 10 minutes for the draft? Greetings, Stefan Winter --=20 Stefan WINTER Ingenieur de Recherche Fondation RESTENA - R=C3=A9seau T=C3=A9l=C3=A9informatique de l'Education= Nationale et de la Recherche 2, avenue de l'Universit=C3=A9 L-4365 Esch-sur-Alzette Tel: +352 424409 1 Fax: +352 422473 PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the recipient's key is known to me http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 --------------070902090005070801090009 Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; name="0x8A39DC66.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0x8A39DC66.asc" -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG v2 mQINBFIplEwBEADTSz+DS8nio+RSvfSLLfaOnCGi1nqpn8Pb1laVUyEvnAAzZ5je miS88GxfiDH6hUGlWzcaW0hCfUHGiohr485adbjxRksPngWgAt/1bRxpifsW3zOb Fjgog01WWQV5Sihlwc4zr8zvYbFA5BJZ6YdkR9C5J015riv5OS30WTjA65SSXgYr b7zJWPwmegTFwE093uBFvC39waz3xYpVu5j87nO6w2MVQt/8sY2/2BFPEq+xfOaj l18UEwc7w8SCgnZdlVNcmEK4UBvJuwS/1lsR2JeQa8Gu1EDxC7PRgMgNXsDSWnnB e9aVmfG54+6ILe1QH2dwk9sPBQT5w2+vjijrb3Dv9ur+1kN+TNU2XE436jVpnnY/ 3OsLdix30STQn4Q/XOm7YoVMeDwwviefilRxzK0dXA+wKj92T68Od82CFxuZqPAg BCVmWfQM91iK9piqFK+QP+R3vF6+NGDBdwbe68iVKs0v5L8XmbxBQndjpmo+lo2a smBR2TAIfZHaKdgtBw13u3GPVVKlg/Mpko8ki9JOSem2aFyi3kQEVKptWgXT3POl 97DWJzsR5VyKz6GOx9kJAEISRyLZwm0wqh8+9LCza5oeIKW381lzq1b9x30vOh8C BSQQJ+cG9ko0yPHAj7Suw2TmPXx1qMctmE6Ahq82ZW30SljdZby8WQuR2wARAQAB tDxTdGVmYW4gV2ludGVyIChSRVNURU5BIGtleSAyMDEzKykgPHN0ZWZhbi53aW50 ZXJAcmVzdGVuYS5sdT6JAjkEEwECACMFAlIplEwCGwMHCwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsE FgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZj7/D/99hVS+mJr8dSPCaDaUFFxBiT2eI1Lo R8VKEerTCRw5BsdL6pN2eRJZ9NmsqWo1ynWVHEzO91bNZ+oZGgyoNohcBAI7p+r0 qUTzkyqwdZO4kMm0pqKoM9xkP3tf2mjGujKjOz4Y7S7wnz2ZFokeUsecoRVJF/++ /qHnmeWLn44J1HUKLHYCjMu+QXGOgGXgz024jQ5eUrnPwzNp0Z90AFVHlWC+bymt y/ToIUUCQqS5Ff0jzdWLd8U695OG9iGvjBQT1LdEjsfbAwuKV5UcnpxNqUpUwKa5 9hdX5/2cMZP07FI1UXwnBlxa8rJfdb13FLjSKX4vUUHedYUZMjMPgcwl1a+zGE22 lHiSQWgP8QLA/W3BLsi22ERCEPZBfexOeOtaWIItDIz18fIaQoMDoRPshzar0JI2 CzLYsyeKySAtYJEHFVoLmMvhkwzBmgqA/BEswUA67CfCr1jFHRXdpmWM7YkyAmMa 9q6LwquWKS5+MXlUXe/3oZUcgpw/T9Uuy3Jo3RdS7B3jFcWaVr6KsO/A9u1gr/aY n5M+iJTQSj4vzqtkQaJTpSspRZoKa66HZt3IwSYiDiYZqtM83ynuj9kjnZzGfnuT aNIi996q6Mptr33mOzIE1wmMqnJYwTr3EcNtf483q/qrJwh5ES8Q9xY7aat/ZcSl 8fKubW4TlfVr8YhGBBARAgAGBQJSKZUGAAoJEPo5vdH/HhVmYTgAn24eoqO/O98o vNpt08Uab/+/tmYKAJ9kjXm9Njz5h33efzeelZUa484rr7kCDQRSKZRMARAAvBPp n7FQq7LQ5glohtbL6XIEo1U4X67S0TzUYieENSWSVYuWYIhCBldmWdmH8Bpj/qHe qdon7v+SLtR4WngzMR9toupKcFfHnbP9kpazTSB2ySHxXWGX1gJOpPXdCcg9iveK BHEsDn00ThTcPsvtXpnnzET16pXIvOXO0bxTmVZ4INIF1SWgvYma/g8kBbgXLpkj 8tOywBqFiiYPEZlDeCxDHiMgUDh6olda9K/0TZFTdMPUgjKuubfAeaDNCOrVt4Rj mFOaRLikcZocmgJhm3z/j25x7/mnNu+0di1H/S67YGQJ+pqCFInzIXDx7aRW2+JC iqsY2X3xOPWZZzjyis5SNnfOcPH3gt2hYz1fy+thsBGf4NgCN01JRqIJ2/MOQCgU dwh+9l8xqaJvCkUHM4hVh4W62MAe1u7UEqQbvvNEqxM5034vcvlE+/LRkrDCspw+ 2YJ9QyroLerVRwW5DVleP8Ifi8VB3yD80nqXYs9aqRy0BkDNIQ43ERhESMt8dJqr NkxgC6pemZrhNwyDh+hy2kPNGQh/iBpdKuH1o3E24TIZoV2v3YHvzob7aAYHddE/ PofAXhJW7I9mAs+HdWDmnI8ckuPDFpFH+Y/BFGvEXgcnJAJ1wEvf+4LuiIi0MHjR 4EWFn9vvoFDAIqD10h3FSd3D59HGtdSsNn4XaCsAEQEAAYkCHwQYAQIACQUCUimU TAIbDAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZhBtEACL036ddjc5pFoYIdoUY1vT8SMXJNquewCnL1qu DADzqDZFU5GNlQEy10krSfBwlTb9ahTtE0JFrOdZwUZtoa1Pgfr8nU6KOgrXPHbN jS/9dyc5CwGVVIpOavIm2CsMVDJ9LCF/NT+u/t1k6eGfHhPVl3dUQyDa/lzc1chK UIVQYQkFmr0A/iXP+29lFCaI+IeyU0bSdZhezDwUROn5vEx+fiPZyHDShCb+BxJv /o2LQp9JHenCiSbO+ioRZdxgbWfoKBuXOfmSStqMWXas/gZ5vS3xq72LNtKPRxgp jX3P8Zml1XDqpcBau7eK75VKE0Yd06YxnUIsbcEzInUc3uzW/u0DFpXYkMJb0XIv JyUt5yYPKfV13N8kSkPi5pLxm8yuftXMzfgeFMR7nafY3glTVj/TxElzg6xeZNqf C2ZjIbBtZg9ylHU8u8wwB+dX282crs0R3N9A064C71/cXlBqcjzjlKH2NUIWGxr+ od3TXFIFjszSU3NgMPKrWNhFLLwS81MpbkOe73s6aDhS8RDyNucoxtKXriLR+4Xi u4+pyj5ukYP1JqpB3ZobY/XZgCnJMye+7xeTpIDJ1LPORxM3NNAElyb26lxAK2P+ km+EpI0Zzz6rNSCfg5jYQ474+e/GBgaSG4MlaPoZ+XAfN46u1Xjjv1/AkkA4IA6m 5zP5og=3D=3D =3D3NUt -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- --------------070902090005070801090009-- --oQWURxkrA5Q2KXe1icLfNl5ih9mPm3WfI-- --6vTkxpWimfBruok3Mm49lgL7jaDpKdkUx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJW6pnGAAoJEMDeajWKOdxmLCcQAIzhMjSrIqPd0aECg7tKID8Y CWe1lYvS19pew8NOCcYuQNUvjhUWGJ+/UBQlECOp/lmjom5CHdFYT0cZ/l6F55W2 o9CWoa6O0R4BAXlu6HnajGZvN9HXoawOsnOy/dNQka7FbWu3XH0Hx0OkHfddsLCZ aVkL/Buucl6DyDjxIfjy9uSfI6nmVy+mMvRP4Z72klQSAIpTwUartMxPUCUYXv/U 8HH4N9Mb8KzqTWwp8fFmslP1dHoZgbUbGpbaGcscnU42T1P2kmIjkzUn1xkx7CAz ks9RVFcE1kiJRKvAJtWuqwvHaSUSycX1FgETYcPrW8Z4+RiA8lXE8SSlYcnh6B/E 6ZGX04hWMiMO51uE1xwrH8+45fNfitSuEK3WNawZpyH2+Dc4tdVlA+xToGoYg3G0 iclUnkvxhSxjT9IVlZTrkRTVq26fEc8hRRhOXUGu1acAiWmNInMTp6QEABQpJaYb yLLjlCat9KTJgFc/nWZpMudUDLJH0nHy2szInGDDrGARsOv6dFRa+dGXFK0nJavQ +FCiLh2kY37eCrCHrP+w7j9wCVJvVzuGyQkF7V0N7MGOpynHs0G9ENT/Y/lnf3hJ XOr6GuK4uyl6ptxPlN4eDwpVrEjLlQJoZv71BUlcJPVRNBjPwZwzJNI0pjCEJRdV mVGYZxFI4FM6h/0ws1+0 =ksoO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6vTkxpWimfBruok3Mm49lgL7jaDpKdkUx-- From nobody Fri Mar 18 06:42:19 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D808612D8DA; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:42:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.72 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fb.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RBYD_dUKGbFP; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:42:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0b-00082601.pphosted.com (mx0b-00082601.pphosted.com [67.231.153.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9846012D8AE; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:42:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0001303.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0001303.ppops.net (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u2IDdIv5024733; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:41:58 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fb.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : content-type : mime-version; s=facebook; bh=fwCJO6lkAsr5z8Rtu0eziZTO7hm8eOoLJf5rkEj0yuc=; b=eRpg95tS1U9LZoh4z0ITaywKyUfHZsOrWQ3kX2m4JevuOpj68r+S4y8XNs2AEyxJOL4k PS81NiersA3/mso0tsVlrTX+XtkcV4tx9o7kPkOQemk5zJMz4dqwAvfDPN2hTEVdP2mZ MFi0GgVBvWV7yCpF5AAZIu0KDTDP/5bivEc= Received: from mail.thefacebook.com ([199.201.64.23]) by m0001303.ppops.net with ESMTP id 21puy7pdyf-1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:41:58 -0700 Received: from PRN-MBX01-2.TheFacebook.com ([169.254.3.204]) by PRN-CHUB04.TheFacebook.com ([fe80::7ded:c10e:ef04:80d8%12]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:41:55 -0700 From: Petr Lapukhov To: "zhoutianran@huawei.com" , "opsawg@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires Thread-Index: AdGBG/AfqOMqqTiySfW6JE63NNQ3bg== Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:41:56 +0000 Message-ID: <3F437107848A5140A6A19222EFFB3481200F061D@PRN-MBX01-2.TheFacebook.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.52.123] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3F437107848A5140A6A19222EFFB3481200F061DPRNMBX012TheFac_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: safe X-FB-Internal: Safe X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-03-18_07:, , signatures=0 Archived-At: Cc: "opsawg-chairs@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:42:18 -0000 --_000_3F437107848A5140A6A19222EFFB3481200F061DPRNMBX012TheFac_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Folks, If possible I would like to request a slot on the agenda to present https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lapukhov-dataplane-probe/ This to start work on in-band telemetry format standardization. The technol= ogy is still at early stages, and I believe it would be helpful to agree on= common formats to be used across multiple silicon vendors. Looking for feedback and finding a best place to continue this work at. Thanks! Petr --_000_3F437107848A5140A6A19222EFFB3481200F061DPRNMBX012TheFac_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Folks,

If possible I would like to request a slot on the agenda to present

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lapukhov-dataplane-probe/

This to start work on in-band telemetry format standardization. The te= chnology is still at early stages, and I believe it would be helpful to agr= ee on common formats to be used across multiple silicon vendors.

Looking for feedback and finding a best place to continue this work at= .

Thanks!

Petr
--_000_3F437107848A5140A6A19222EFFB3481200F061DPRNMBX012TheFac_-- From nobody Fri Mar 18 07:00:29 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietf.org Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A81912DA81; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 07:00:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.17.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160318140028.30012.59183.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 07:00:28 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new-05.txt X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:00:28 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group of the IETF. Title : HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in USM for SNMPv3 Authors : Johannes Merkle Manfred Lochter Filename : draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new-05.txt Pages : 14 Date : 2016-03-18 Abstract: This document specifies several authentication protocols based on the SHA-2 hash functions for the User-based Security Model (USM) for SNMPv3 defined in RFC 3414. It obsoletes RFC 7630, in which the MIB MODULE-IDENTITY value was incorrectly specified. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new-05 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new-05 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Fri Mar 18 07:06:36 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87AF912DBBE for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 07:06:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IpTSCHzE2efx for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 07:06:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from a.mx.secunet.com (a.mx.secunet.com [62.96.220.36]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88CB312D8FA for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 07:04:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (alg1 [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A82C1A04A1 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:04:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id IKMykiJnR5k6 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:04:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-essen-01.secunet.de (unknown [10.53.40.204]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5377F1A049F for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:04:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.208.1.99] (10.208.1.99) by mail-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.279.2; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:04:00 +0100 References: <20160318140028.30012.59183.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> To: From: Johannes Merkle X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20160318140028.30012.59183.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Message-ID: <56EC0AEF.4090803@secunet.com> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:04:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160318140028.30012.59183.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.208.1.99] X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10 Archived-At: Subject: [OPSAWG] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new-05.txt X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:06:35 -0000 this version just recovers the nice formatting of the MIB module definition that was messed up with the revision -04. Johannes -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -------- Betreff: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new-05.txt Datum: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 07:00:28 -0700 Von: internet-drafts@ietf.org An: i-d-announce@ietf.org Kopie (CC): opsawg@ietf.org A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group of the IETF. Title : HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in USM for SNMPv3 Authors : Johannes Merkle Manfred Lochter Filename : draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new-05.txt Pages : 14 Date : 2016-03-18 Abstract: This document specifies several authentication protocols based on the SHA-2 hash functions for the User-based Security Model (USM) for SNMPv3 defined in RFC 3414. It obsoletes RFC 7630, in which the MIB MODULE-IDENTITY value was incorrectly specified. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new-05 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new-05 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Dr. Johannes Merkle Principal Division Innere Sicherheit secunet Security Networks AG Mergenthaler Allee 77 65760 Eschborn Germany Telefon +49 201 54 54-3091 Telefax +49 201 54 54-1325 Mobil +49 175 2224439 johannes.merkle@secunet.com www.secunet.com From nobody Fri Mar 18 16:27:29 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE85512D557; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:27:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.109 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VsJEYzVbDu7a; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:27:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sobco.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.164]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88EE412D50B; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:27:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D691917429; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:27:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sobco.com Received: from sobco.sobco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sobco.sobco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zuhpuWH6dmTq; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:27:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from golem.sobco.com (golem.sobco.com [136.248.127.162]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CDC4191741A; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:27:23 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) From: "Scott O. Bradner" In-Reply-To: <3F437107848A5140A6A19222EFFB3481200F061D@PRN-MBX01-2.TheFacebook.com> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:27:22 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <3F437107848A5140A6A19222EFFB3481200F061D@PRN-MBX01-2.TheFacebook.com> To: Petr Lapukhov X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) Archived-At: Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" , "opsawg-chairs@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:27:28 -0000 sorry but our agenda filled up a while back I would suggest sending a note to the mailing list pointing to your ID = and asking for review and asking the WG if they think the topic is right for opsawg Scott > On Mar 18, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Petr Lapukhov wrote: >=20 > Folks, >=20 > If possible I would like to request a slot on the agenda to present >=20 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lapukhov-dataplane-probe/ >=20 > This to start work on in-band telemetry format standardization. The = technology is still at early stages, and I believe it would be helpful = to agree on common formats to be used across multiple silicon vendors. >=20 > Looking for feedback and finding a best place to continue this work = at. >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > Petr From nobody Fri Mar 18 20:30:32 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E98512D6AD for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:30:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VxekHK1q4Qd2 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:30:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F30112D7A2 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:30:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ah7an-0003QI-GI; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 03:30:21 +0000 Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:30:19 +0900 Message-ID: From: Randy Bush To: Petr Lapukhov In-Reply-To: References: <3F437107848A5140A6A19222EFFB3481200F061D@PRN-MBX01-2.TheFacebook.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Archived-At: Cc: opsawg Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 03:30:30 -0000 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lapukhov-dataplane-probe/ given the heavy per-hop payload, do you have estimates on how many hops with an mtu of 512? or is this really meant for use within an operator/datacenter, and maybe one with junbo frames? i do not understand the relationship of the Telemetry Record Template to the Telemetry Record. are these two separate list structures with reduncancy? or is it one list and the Telemetry Record Template (which has TL but no V) is just there to confuse me? randy From nobody Fri Mar 18 20:42:41 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1189E12D6A2 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:42:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E272tKcrknzE for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:42:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pf0-x22f.google.com (mail-pf0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BCD412D78E for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:42:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id u190so192667004pfb.3 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:42:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LRo+tT78SEgixFUMwP4nqGBq3UWX5mYhaKjbcvgdn7w=; b=NEUZuhz90H6S5eCf7hrj2EVuyQsoOpDmqlVyXb7UGqqpNolfO067X0kOXkHfMwreHM 4yhgLv7bnhE//hlCdY1yDytBYYv+N8sVniO8ahw1p9NrBwvmX3y3yzQz4WceYZvGwzk4 70+c7sU95SRStvLDNNtDWaXc2+ovTyLwXriCSYCdncu9kcLhN4TxausbhB6Frzie+wBV 94xw+bS6Dg6c4CESYO6tTYWwPS9zllA9wvq7sTNp2ChAJSRcLDoS9Opt+7gnqIR784OF tg/lZKBUTz6QzWByvrjDYKWvqTVOE49HRtKN1HOIIgbyakNuHbD7ltlwcTLfalHy6yHC Ky9g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LRo+tT78SEgixFUMwP4nqGBq3UWX5mYhaKjbcvgdn7w=; b=b3kh22bWPzCu3ZVdwKS1MsSbo6XYBWDa0Wbbg0SBRpC29AT5zgfeDJ+kbH05QNQMVP TtMt3BsP5dNr3qI6ch17tdULC+zq1z+eb0WtlbIl9G3HStU4eqIupMFKuW2p6qkV4/uk BWRdISB8gpiZMj5sogKHYnPfeNBBVWRB7Q8nBN43UjQXWLdaYsCEa8nWkLH7TqIXQK0C Qg4+QYp4bZyw9jrNz8WkgJLowVwrwOL98HUt64spTCTAzPHn0L2ZLRbaVgeWd8gZCIp7 0b+UYIHQkV4HTbDuXPrDHhIM3JBcb12OYP+59y4TUjkNvxOwf/6KgL20Ran9RWtzxyEV ssmA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKswvyjkEfIHN7t5hEfqnXwFVKghZGp6HChwzNhfQ3PC6nDG1A9eyy4/ZOgSedubQ== X-Received: by 10.66.190.229 with SMTP id gt5mr28777608pac.118.1458358958014; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:42:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local (63-140-98-168-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [63.140.98.168]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 88sm24176383pfj.20.2016.03.18.20.42.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:42:37 -0700 (PDT) To: Randy Bush , Petr Lapukhov References: <3F437107848A5140A6A19222EFFB3481200F061D@PRN-MBX01-2.TheFacebook.com> From: Melinda Shore Message-ID: <56ECCAA6.9050609@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:42:30 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: opsawg Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 03:42:40 -0000 I actually proposed something very much like this about 15 years ago, based on a flexible transport layer that could deal with things like NAT and with both authentication and authorization (I'm always dismayed by proposals that are hand-wavey about security, baffled by ones that don't mention it at all). I think it's generally a good idea even if the proposal is flawed. Given that he's punted on both security and transport it may be better to treat this as an information model or what-have-you rather than as a complete protocol. Melinda From nobody Fri Mar 18 20:48:12 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ECE412D74A for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:48:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LbvbxPJ8mnza for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:48:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6FFA12D70F for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:48:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ah7rz-0003TB-Ht; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 03:48:07 +0000 Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:48:05 +0900 Message-ID: From: Randy Bush To: Melinda Shore In-Reply-To: <56ECCAA6.9050609@gmail.com> References: <3F437107848A5140A6A19222EFFB3481200F061D@PRN-MBX01-2.TheFacebook.com> <56ECCAA6.9050609@gmail.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Archived-At: Cc: opsawg Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 03:48:11 -0000 the paragraph i deleted before sending was [ i do have sympathy for the motivation. heck, nick duffield suckered me in the days when at&t had a research lab, but veered left into trajectory sampling and the psamp stuff. ] i missed your stuff; apologies. a cite would be good. i do see the need for something in this space, for sure. agree that security is critical; though i suspect the authors were more oriented to intra-operator. we all know how that ends up. > Given that he's punted on both security and transport it may be better > to treat this as an information model or what-have-you rather than as > a complete protocol. would you like a saucer of yang milk? :) randy From nobody Fri Mar 18 22:51:02 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E1B12D550 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:51:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.721 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fb.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xfq6qGEr1pz0 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:51:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com (mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com [67.231.145.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32C2412D50B for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:51:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0044010.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u2J5lNLG027410; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:50:59 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fb.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=facebook; bh=AQ9ebS8su0LI330lrYh/XkI7ziT0RzD56WYAwMofynQ=; b=Y5wZC/AY2XB5jnvLGBuqQLqNKjdyZc/Zc4zbya6pxW3IQxo2fSMtQopJCchx7OLq6XPp TAECb7mpIqC8dCFJFmAkoz/tWrmji8fE6x3HxLkV47ryBeRxLzTbaxFUTBlKKBOTxgen xvYj4ghcUWYFFwBZZ2JuyWi8mnXWH3zGkdQ= Received: from mail.thefacebook.com ([199.201.64.23]) by mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 21rn9mj9fr-1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:50:59 -0700 Received: from PRN-MBX01-2.TheFacebook.com ([169.254.3.204]) by PRN-CHUB12.TheFacebook.com ([fe80::ddee:413f:3120:8216%12]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:50:59 -0700 From: Petr Lapukhov To: Randy Bush Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires Thread-Index: AQHRgW29cxBrUJAOBEuirREgG8iXRJ9gkc+A//+vDRo= Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 05:50:57 +0000 Message-ID: <3F437107848A5140A6A19222EFFB3481200F29A4@PRN-MBX01-2.TheFacebook.com> References: <3F437107848A5140A6A19222EFFB3481200F061D@PRN-MBX01-2.TheFacebook.com> , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.52.123] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: safe X-FB-Internal: Safe X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-03-19_03:, , signatures=0 Archived-At: Cc: opsawg Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 05:51:02 -0000 Hi Randy,=0A= =0A= You are right, the primary use case is data-center network, with its specif= ic devices: e.g. multiple shared-memory-buffer chips connected in Clos topo= logy. The typical MTU I've seen so far there is still 1500, even though ena= bling jumbo framing is generally not a problem. However, the use of GRO and= interrupt coalescing on host side made the need for jumbo MTU less pressur= ing.=0A= =0A= The idea behind the "template" field was to inform the network device of th= e TLVs that are being "requested" by the originator of the message, along w= ith the full spec of the field sizes. The device would then fill in the "sl= ots" it can fill in, e.g. the device identifier, ingress/egress ports. This= allows the originator to request for "lots of stuff", but get back the inf= o supported by each individual device. I did receive feedback from some of = the folks working on silicon side that parsing the template might be "somew= hat" expensive, though not impossible. I'm continuing that conversation to = get closer to "real" possibilities of the upcoming silicon. =0A= =0A= I mainly started the document to bring the in-band telemetry to the attenti= on of the general network community. To us (facebook neteng) the ability to= embed device state in data-plane packets is an important enabler for real-= time fault isolation in the network (our current methodologies are based on= some variations around fast/wide traceroute).=0A= =0A= Regards,=0A= =0A= Petr=0A= ________________________________________=0A= From: Randy Bush [randy@psg.com]=0A= Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 8:30 PM=0A= To: Petr Lapukhov=0A= Cc: opsawg=0A= Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires=0A= =0A= > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=3Dhttps-3A__datatracker.ietf.o= rg_doc_draft-2Dlapukhov-2Ddataplane-2Dprobe_&d=3DCwIBAg&c=3D5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd= 41b3MUw&r=3DLU_vJaM_EQu1Ssm35j2xlA&m=3DuBG5ONHmU7YzsFZ9R25b6TL-l0JZUYFvwDLE= AWPqEnA&s=3DIAtJOy3uPSUJUcEYqZI85xYPTWOcuSQEvcxRddmryAs&e=3D=0A= =0A= given the heavy per-hop payload, do you have estimates on how many hops=0A= with an mtu of 512? or is this really meant for use within an=0A= operator/datacenter, and maybe one with junbo frames?=0A= =0A= i do not understand the relationship of the Telemetry Record Template to=0A= the Telemetry Record. are these two separate list structures with=0A= reduncancy? or is it one list and the Telemetry Record Template (which=0A= has TL but no V) is just there to confuse me?=0A= =0A= randy=0A= From nobody Fri Mar 18 23:20:44 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA15312D760 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:20:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YCr2fZlLgoQ2 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8E3F12D796 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:20:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ahAFa-0003qX-UM; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 06:20:39 +0000 Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 15:20:37 +0900 Message-ID: From: Randy Bush To: Petr Lapukhov In-Reply-To: <3F437107848A5140A6A19222EFFB3481200F29A4@PRN-MBX01-2.TheFacebook.com> References: <3F437107848A5140A6A19222EFFB3481200F061D@PRN-MBX01-2.TheFacebook.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Archived-At: Cc: opsawg Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 06:20:43 -0000 petr, > You are right, the primary use case is data-center network, with its > specific devices: e.g. multiple shared-memory-buffer chips connected > in Clos topology. The typical MTU I've seen so far there is still > 1500, even though enabling jumbo framing is generally not a problem. > However, the use of GRO and interrupt coalescing on host side made the > need for jumbo MTU less pressuring. i have sympathy for this. but there is too much experience with things designed for the LAN ending up on the WAN. hence melinda's concern for security, mine for mtu, etc. but this is a good start for a discussion. there has been need for something in this space since before dirt was invented. and there have been a number of tries. i am willing to keep reading and to have useless opinions. randy From nobody Mon Mar 21 02:30:30 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844C812D5C2; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 02:30:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1nsCdW-nGXLH; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 02:30:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (smtprelay.restena.lu [158.64.1.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA4A312D53F; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 02:30:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aragorn.restena.lu (aragorn.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8::155]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3729243ADF; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:30:22 +0100 (CET) References: <20160321092737.6013.75371.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> To: IETF OPSEC From: Stefan Winter Openpgp: id=AD3091F3AB24E05F4F722C03C0DE6A358A39DC66; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20160321092737.6013.75371.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Message-ID: <56EFBF2D.5090904@restena.lu> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:30:21 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160321092737.6013.75371.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Vt8p7CqgAjnW7GVCd4HDlGJ4Ae8R8HAB1" Archived-At: Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" Subject: [OPSAWG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-winter-opsec-netconfig-metadata-00.txt X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:30:26 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Vt8p7CqgAjnW7GVCd4HDlGJ4Ae8R8HAB1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Gj0vPEO7xIfsU86893Jvln2qLpii0p7mj" From: Stefan Winter To: IETF OPSEC Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" Message-ID: <56EFBF2D.5090904@restena.lu> Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-winter-opsec-netconfig-metadata-00.txt References: <20160321092737.6013.75371.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20160321092737.6013.75371.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> --Gj0vPEO7xIfsU86893Jvln2qLpii0p7mj Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080400000403050804020609" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080400000403050804020609 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, this is the draft corresponding to my agenda slot request from last week.= Greetings, Stefan Winter -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -------- Betreff: New Version Notification for draft-winter-opsec-netconfig-metadata-00.txt Datum: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 02:27:37 -0700 Von: internet-drafts@ietf.org An: Stefan Winter A new version of I-D, draft-winter-opsec-netconfig-metadata-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Stefan Winter and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-winter-opsec-netconfig-metadata Revision: 00 Title: A Configuration File Format for Network Services on Leaf Devices Document date: 2016-03-18 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 22 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-winter-opsec-netconfig-metadat= a-00.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-winter-opsec-netconfig-metadata/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-winter-opsec-netconfig-metadata-00 Abstract: This document specifies a YANG module for transfering configuration information of deployments of network services towards leaf nodes (hosts) on the internet. Such configuration files are meant to be discovered, consumed and used by configuration agents on the host to achieve correct and secure setup of these services on the consuming device. This iteration of the I-D concentrates on Wi-Fi network setup and EAP credentials, but is extensible to cover a wide range including VPN, E-Mail and other services. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submiss= ion until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat --------------080400000403050804020609 Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; name="0x8A39DC66.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0x8A39DC66.asc" -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG v2 mQINBFIplEwBEADTSz+DS8nio+RSvfSLLfaOnCGi1nqpn8Pb1laVUyEvnAAzZ5je miS88GxfiDH6hUGlWzcaW0hCfUHGiohr485adbjxRksPngWgAt/1bRxpifsW3zOb Fjgog01WWQV5Sihlwc4zr8zvYbFA5BJZ6YdkR9C5J015riv5OS30WTjA65SSXgYr b7zJWPwmegTFwE093uBFvC39waz3xYpVu5j87nO6w2MVQt/8sY2/2BFPEq+xfOaj l18UEwc7w8SCgnZdlVNcmEK4UBvJuwS/1lsR2JeQa8Gu1EDxC7PRgMgNXsDSWnnB e9aVmfG54+6ILe1QH2dwk9sPBQT5w2+vjijrb3Dv9ur+1kN+TNU2XE436jVpnnY/ 3OsLdix30STQn4Q/XOm7YoVMeDwwviefilRxzK0dXA+wKj92T68Od82CFxuZqPAg BCVmWfQM91iK9piqFK+QP+R3vF6+NGDBdwbe68iVKs0v5L8XmbxBQndjpmo+lo2a smBR2TAIfZHaKdgtBw13u3GPVVKlg/Mpko8ki9JOSem2aFyi3kQEVKptWgXT3POl 97DWJzsR5VyKz6GOx9kJAEISRyLZwm0wqh8+9LCza5oeIKW381lzq1b9x30vOh8C BSQQJ+cG9ko0yPHAj7Suw2TmPXx1qMctmE6Ahq82ZW30SljdZby8WQuR2wARAQAB tDxTdGVmYW4gV2ludGVyIChSRVNURU5BIGtleSAyMDEzKykgPHN0ZWZhbi53aW50 ZXJAcmVzdGVuYS5sdT6JAjkEEwECACMFAlIplEwCGwMHCwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsE FgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZj7/D/99hVS+mJr8dSPCaDaUFFxBiT2eI1Lo R8VKEerTCRw5BsdL6pN2eRJZ9NmsqWo1ynWVHEzO91bNZ+oZGgyoNohcBAI7p+r0 qUTzkyqwdZO4kMm0pqKoM9xkP3tf2mjGujKjOz4Y7S7wnz2ZFokeUsecoRVJF/++ /qHnmeWLn44J1HUKLHYCjMu+QXGOgGXgz024jQ5eUrnPwzNp0Z90AFVHlWC+bymt y/ToIUUCQqS5Ff0jzdWLd8U695OG9iGvjBQT1LdEjsfbAwuKV5UcnpxNqUpUwKa5 9hdX5/2cMZP07FI1UXwnBlxa8rJfdb13FLjSKX4vUUHedYUZMjMPgcwl1a+zGE22 lHiSQWgP8QLA/W3BLsi22ERCEPZBfexOeOtaWIItDIz18fIaQoMDoRPshzar0JI2 CzLYsyeKySAtYJEHFVoLmMvhkwzBmgqA/BEswUA67CfCr1jFHRXdpmWM7YkyAmMa 9q6LwquWKS5+MXlUXe/3oZUcgpw/T9Uuy3Jo3RdS7B3jFcWaVr6KsO/A9u1gr/aY n5M+iJTQSj4vzqtkQaJTpSspRZoKa66HZt3IwSYiDiYZqtM83ynuj9kjnZzGfnuT aNIi996q6Mptr33mOzIE1wmMqnJYwTr3EcNtf483q/qrJwh5ES8Q9xY7aat/ZcSl 8fKubW4TlfVr8YhGBBARAgAGBQJSKZUGAAoJEPo5vdH/HhVmYTgAn24eoqO/O98o vNpt08Uab/+/tmYKAJ9kjXm9Njz5h33efzeelZUa484rr7kCDQRSKZRMARAAvBPp n7FQq7LQ5glohtbL6XIEo1U4X67S0TzUYieENSWSVYuWYIhCBldmWdmH8Bpj/qHe qdon7v+SLtR4WngzMR9toupKcFfHnbP9kpazTSB2ySHxXWGX1gJOpPXdCcg9iveK BHEsDn00ThTcPsvtXpnnzET16pXIvOXO0bxTmVZ4INIF1SWgvYma/g8kBbgXLpkj 8tOywBqFiiYPEZlDeCxDHiMgUDh6olda9K/0TZFTdMPUgjKuubfAeaDNCOrVt4Rj mFOaRLikcZocmgJhm3z/j25x7/mnNu+0di1H/S67YGQJ+pqCFInzIXDx7aRW2+JC iqsY2X3xOPWZZzjyis5SNnfOcPH3gt2hYz1fy+thsBGf4NgCN01JRqIJ2/MOQCgU dwh+9l8xqaJvCkUHM4hVh4W62MAe1u7UEqQbvvNEqxM5034vcvlE+/LRkrDCspw+ 2YJ9QyroLerVRwW5DVleP8Ifi8VB3yD80nqXYs9aqRy0BkDNIQ43ERhESMt8dJqr NkxgC6pemZrhNwyDh+hy2kPNGQh/iBpdKuH1o3E24TIZoV2v3YHvzob7aAYHddE/ PofAXhJW7I9mAs+HdWDmnI8ckuPDFpFH+Y/BFGvEXgcnJAJ1wEvf+4LuiIi0MHjR 4EWFn9vvoFDAIqD10h3FSd3D59HGtdSsNn4XaCsAEQEAAYkCHwQYAQIACQUCUimU TAIbDAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZhBtEACL036ddjc5pFoYIdoUY1vT8SMXJNquewCnL1qu DADzqDZFU5GNlQEy10krSfBwlTb9ahTtE0JFrOdZwUZtoa1Pgfr8nU6KOgrXPHbN jS/9dyc5CwGVVIpOavIm2CsMVDJ9LCF/NT+u/t1k6eGfHhPVl3dUQyDa/lzc1chK UIVQYQkFmr0A/iXP+29lFCaI+IeyU0bSdZhezDwUROn5vEx+fiPZyHDShCb+BxJv /o2LQp9JHenCiSbO+ioRZdxgbWfoKBuXOfmSStqMWXas/gZ5vS3xq72LNtKPRxgp jX3P8Zml1XDqpcBau7eK75VKE0Yd06YxnUIsbcEzInUc3uzW/u0DFpXYkMJb0XIv JyUt5yYPKfV13N8kSkPi5pLxm8yuftXMzfgeFMR7nafY3glTVj/TxElzg6xeZNqf C2ZjIbBtZg9ylHU8u8wwB+dX282crs0R3N9A064C71/cXlBqcjzjlKH2NUIWGxr+ od3TXFIFjszSU3NgMPKrWNhFLLwS81MpbkOe73s6aDhS8RDyNucoxtKXriLR+4Xi u4+pyj5ukYP1JqpB3ZobY/XZgCnJMye+7xeTpIDJ1LPORxM3NNAElyb26lxAK2P+ km+EpI0Zzz6rNSCfg5jYQ474+e/GBgaSG4MlaPoZ+XAfN46u1Xjjv1/AkkA4IA6m 5zP5og=3D=3D =3D3NUt -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- --------------080400000403050804020609-- --Gj0vPEO7xIfsU86893Jvln2qLpii0p7mj-- --Vt8p7CqgAjnW7GVCd4HDlGJ4Ae8R8HAB1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJW778uAAoJEMDeajWKOdxmca8P/2Nw0o2q9YMWYsixZWX6M9DR OhlCBAq7olZMP7bD8kM8wDpnqk5nkPyEJf5b0DO5eJ076hFbQvxfUWuCPlsjlJHN fVNj+SKM5X2U5zKFz2GoQF+Mg6X7fp+XeXOV4gdlOP3q9dIIrEByzdznzCZBJvsr vCWF0zO3HxOpOFqCOJQiCisuI200vmAZrOWE0dB8ZnIaaIdOWFsnhzHVbJjn72LF PqHSFcTPHB0PUCjXqBY2A9O7gfsruhF9DplUVBaPdNCrx2blBjm1LutaDNNgDzes 0lhz2xq7q4jWxM3F0yt6fNTQYRKTVpi5e9v3UqLOLY/wCVHS5+FkpyrfruvDpA98 IHAyZt2QyseUfUd7qqdH8aj/yG91iJcTqMEuEb9ZxW4qeGuv49G+GEBkr8mi1qo1 BuMQfuJ8KQjpJ5a1VXLeJIRxQ8Yp38hq0+OiqfXZfVEQtQ1yGdKvywiPNIwNI5kW YIsuZcjiDoF/YKYhPo3irrPMxZx30o4e1n6r0/0JMdv6N1XsgTT3aukd3NgfI0+a KnvPv3HT7ECh3KeuQsoSzCjNEsmd1UZfYKt5XC+nmWdLRIyWL86B9o3BCTL3D0VE hxIiGVZctcN6H5JUZcMB5wnjEKkQ3U177iMkK+0nAH3qE4h6NDGahx1MFbG8wlKw y7SicPca7A2lOYbi1aeO =lw4T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Vt8p7CqgAjnW7GVCd4HDlGJ4Ae8R8HAB1-- From nobody Mon Mar 21 11:54:58 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietf.org Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327AC12D87D; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:54:56 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.17.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160321185456.12247.59591.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:54:56 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: joelja@gmail.com, draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new@ietf.org, The IESG , opsawg-chairs@ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [OPSAWG] Protocol Action: 'HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in USM for SNMPv3' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new-05.txt) X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:54:56 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in USM for SNMPv3' (draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new-05.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Operations and Management Area Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Benoit Claise and Joel Jaeggli. A URL of this Internet Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new/ The Document is intended as a Proposed Standard. It Obsoletes RFC 7630, also a PS. To cut to the chase the important and substantive change in this document vs rfc 7630 is Section 8 and 10 said: snmpModules 235 It should have said: mib-2 235 Technical Summary This document specifies several authentication protocols based on the SHA-2 hash functions for the User-based Security Model (USM) for SNMPv3 defined in RFC 3414. It obsoletes RFC 7630, in which the MIB MODULE-IDENTITY value was incorrectly specified. Working Group Summary OPSAWG was used and the working group for both the orignal and this replacement document. both have extensively reviewed and modula the error that was discovered, when populating the IANA registry. The registry has been correctly populated however the document errata is sufficiently gross as to necessitate correction. Document Quality The corrections are minor and the original document was extensively reviewed. This version also has benifeted from changes proposed by the secdir. Personnel Joel Jaeggli is sponsoring AD. No appeals, IPR, or additional formal review are anticipated or required. From nobody Mon Mar 21 12:03:33 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B9412DA45; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 12:03:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TdjjZdS7FTnu; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 12:03:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F35012DA8D; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 12:01:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952AB121C; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 19:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.networkradius.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail-server.vmhost2.networkradius.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id grtc5xTdp5mO; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 19:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.20.14] (69-196-165-104.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.165.104]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3D9CCF9; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 19:01:50 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) From: Alan DeKok In-Reply-To: <56EA99C6.2080600@restena.lu> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:02:00 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2764C5A6-F563-4E79-A702-C9A0C06DB932@deployingradius.com> References: <56EA99C6.2080600@restena.lu> To: Winter Stefan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) Archived-At: Cc: IETF OOPSAWG , IETF OPSEC Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] leaf device network configuration format (was draft-winter-opsawg-eap-metadata) X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 19:03:31 -0000 On Mar 17, 2016, at 7:49 AM, Stefan Winter = wrote: > In a nutshell: end users get EAP configuration wrong because it's too > complex, and as a result they are vulnerable to many badnesses out = there > in the Wi-Fi world. A common config format would settle all the = complex > pieces automatically for them, and make the internet a safer place for = them. I'll have a short presentation at the end of RADEXT which addresses = this problem directly. And shows how easy it is for bad actors to = confuse naive users. I'll post a link to the presentation here when it's ready. In short, there is no practical way to onboard users securely via the = method of "connect to an SSID, and click through the prompts". The = configuration MUST be provided to the user signed, and/or via an out of = band method. Alan DeKok. From nobody Thu Mar 24 02:48:11 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6476712D694 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 02:48:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8KZqRANPbDot for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 02:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ig0-x232.google.com (mail-ig0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A56A112D584 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 02:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ig0-x232.google.com with SMTP id nk17so109028097igb.1 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 02:48:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=VsXcax/qAvEHjvVBKkSg1AZ9W7d/VPBfIvjLGp235/U=; b=UdjgqM81In+83QPcihqcdRj/wjatEpD4pg2jwhtlAEffLpCQaXhd3Lnkb101FH9Y9s najZeNRmDaLwAfntTXvpfewnxC7NTmTF6gs2yZRCQ1H4DyumZja9JSNIxp+Omt+LWSwQ MGtAtXxmWBzIVN2n8ZhCO256peneUfRDK1MjHh88sfC7fh2aZ8wi6qF/bVir1ZEEdrmJ B7B33bImzbFHV2nD6MfSK5ckSx9MokWiJOXfsSMlSPf3wUrTDuEcJCwfYO8Zj4Fy/UgU PX3/egTj5Qs4ddqyy1g1OBxt2XlYXDBSEZ7ln/Vf2MVqxQuJm0UL93C7Ymv3s6ocabvq Rjxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=VsXcax/qAvEHjvVBKkSg1AZ9W7d/VPBfIvjLGp235/U=; b=Nqfy6zQ7H8/rPqW049GdnUb38F1vH5dVe7ZdgrqrOPazONJjVH9a9WuaeLi08JiwBr d8SEs+Vf1+me5bcEGz8Crl1TRb+n45O92D2ZH1XFyBSzRgwf+YO/ZRjC03zxvmhEitbI WxvTHsxP9NynupOiiHCM8hpViJvDQBYcUbL+LerPWvJFGJJsPd0SDrJ7EQR3QpVEKFBR r7k55n5qVyPvLecp3SyWHaxujBC4MeeHRZfbhgt6KP9lEPjfRQpIAhShFPXdpofxW/P9 AYSKKr94l1XQoFuC0UHJRHU9Nso6AbMkYlDc0RyrQN3YOGLfzpP1a5p5tEP+7ep9iAnu 3hhg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJkK+L3OUHF2zTA2NXk7ceXReyHc1lcUTVgzTh1vVZ+YceNAYDqVkkyWO14YsHTep8WPcjKZ1ZpgGNhjQ== X-Received: by 10.50.138.8 with SMTP id qm8mr27756051igb.50.1458812888071; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 02:48:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.228.74 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 02:47:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Qiong Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:47:28 +0800 Message-ID: To: opsawg@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1135f144fcc47e052ec857f1 Archived-At: Subject: [OPSAWG] [opsawg]FW:New Version Notification for draft-xie-ps-centralized-address-management-00.txt X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 09:48:10 -0000 --001a1135f144fcc47e052ec857f1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi all, We just submitted a new draft according to comments from last ietf meeting and offline discussions in last couple of weeks. This draft describe the problem of current IP address management in operators network with some practical use cases, as well as the proposed requirements. Your comments and contributions will be highly appreciated! *From:* internet-drafts@ietf.org *Date:* 2016-03-21 23:58 *To:* Qiong Sun ; Xuweiping (A) ; Liushucheng (Will) ; Liushucheng (Will) ; Ian Farrer ; Chongfeng Xie *Subject:* New Version Notification for draft-xie-ps-centralized-address-management-00.txt A new version of I-D, draft-xie-ps-centralized-address-management-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Will(Shucheng) Liu and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-xie-ps-centralized-address-management Revision: 00 Title: Problem statement for centralized address management Document date: 2016-03-21 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 10 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-xie-ps-centralized-address-management-00.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xie-ps-centralized-address-management/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xie-ps-centralized-address-management-00 Abstract: The increase in number, diversity and complexity of modern network devices and services bring new challenges for the management of network resources, such as IP addresses, bandwidth, VAS(Value Added Service) pool, etc. This draft contains a problem statement and defines the requirements for IP address management with practical use cases provided by operators. -- ============================================== Qiong Sun China Telecom Beijing Research Institude Open source code: lightweight 4over6: *http://sourceforge.net/projects/laft6/ * PCP-natcoord:* http://sourceforge.net/projects/pcpportsetdemo/ * =============================================== --001a1135f144fcc47e052ec857f1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,=
We just submitted a new draft according to comments fr= om last ietf meeting
and offline discussions in last = couple of weeks. This draft describe the problem
of cur= rent IP address management in operators network with some practical
use cases, as well as the proposed requirements. Your comments= and
contributions will be highly appreciated!
=C2=A0
Date:= =C2=A02016-03-21=C2=A023:58
Subject:=C2=A0New Version Notific= ation for draft-xie-ps-centralized-address-management-00.txt
=C2=A0
A new version of I-D, draft-xie-ps-centralize= d-address-management-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Wi= ll(Shucheng) Liu and posted to the
IETF repository.
=C2= =A0
Name:=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0 draft-xie-ps-centralized-address-management
Revision:=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 00
Title:=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Problem statement for centralized address= management
Document date:=C2=A0 2016-03-21
Group:=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Individual Submission
Pages:=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 10
URL:=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0https://www.ietf.org/in= ternet-drafts/draft-xie-ps-centralized-address-management-00.txt
<= div>Status:=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xie-ps-centra= lized-address-management/
Htmlized:=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0https://tools.ietf.org/html= /draft-xie-ps-centralized-address-management-00
=C2=A0
<= div>=C2=A0
Abstract:
=C2=A0=C2=A0 The increase in numbe= r, diversity and complexity of modern network
=C2=A0=C2=A0 device= s and services bring new challenges for the management of
=C2=A0= =C2=A0 network resources, such as IP addresses, bandwidth, VAS(Value Added<= /div>
=C2=A0=C2=A0 Service) pool, etc. This draft contains a problem st= atement and
=C2=A0=C2=A0 defines the requirements for IP address = management with practical use
=C2=A0=C2=A0 cases provided by oper= ators.
=C2=A0
=C2=A0

<= /div>--
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Qiong Sun
China Telecom Beijing Res= earch Institude


Open source code:
lightweight 4over6: http://sou= rceforge.net/projects/laft6/
PCP-natcoord: http://sourcefo= rge.net/projects/pcpportsetdemo/
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

--001a1135f144fcc47e052ec857f1-- From nobody Thu Mar 31 12:19:17 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCF312D770 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:19:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.23 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pwdKnJL77sKT for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABFEC12D73A for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BON30830; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:19:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from NKGEML411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.70) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.93) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:19:12 +0100 Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 03:19:07 +0800 From: Zhoutianran To: "opsawg@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: agenda and meeting slides Thread-Index: AdGLgcc7bUWvwMyBRPavY3wra9rfHw== Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 19:19:06 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.200.217.95] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F2183BA75DANKGEML515MBXchi_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A0B0204.56FD7832.0058, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 53dd81ebece4b2e00fc0e57b19a4b6be Archived-At: Subject: [OPSAWG] agenda and meeting slides X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 19:19:16 -0000 --_000_BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F2183BA75DANKGEML515MBXchi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGkgRm9sa3MsDQoNCg0KDQpIZXJlIGlzIHRoZSBsYXRlc3QgYWdlbmRhIGZvciBPUFNBV0cgbWVl dGluZy4NCg0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvcHJvY2VlZGluZ3MvOTUvYWdlbmRhL2FnZW5k YS05NS1vcHNhd2cNCg0KDQoNCkNvdWxkIHRoZSBhdXRob3JzIGxpc3RlZCBvbiB0aGUgYWdlbmRh IHNlbmQgdGhlIHNsaWRlcyB0byB0aGUgY2hhaXJzIHBsZWFzZT8NCg0KDQoNClRoYW5rcywNCg0K VGlhbnJhbg0KDQoNCg== --_000_BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F2183BA75DANKGEML515MBXchi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Folks,

 

Here is the latest agenda for OPSAWG meeting.

https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/agenda/agenda-95-opsa= wg

 

Could the authors listed on the agenda send the slides to the chairs ple= ase?

 

Thanks,

Tianran

 

--_000_BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F2183BA75DANKGEML515MBXchi_--