Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Fwd: [v6ops] Review requested, especially from operators

From: Benoit Claise <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 10:56:32 +0200

On 29/09/2012 13:24, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Tarko Tikan <[email-masked]>
>> Subject: Re: [v6ops] Review requested, especially from operators
>> Date: September 29, 2012 12:31:33 PM GMT+02:00
>> To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <[email-masked]>
>>
>> hey,
>>
>> 2.3.2 mentions IPfix as management protocol but IPfix is push only and is not affected by ingress management ACL.
>>
>> 2.5 IPfix is incorrectly linked to RFC2740 (OSPFv6)
Also it's actually IPFIX and not IPfix.
There are also a couple of small corrections regarding IPFIX.  I'll 
discuss them directly with KK, Eric, and Merike

Regards, Benoit.
>>
>> Coming from someone who is working with IP/MPLS on daily basis, I'd add a little warning to 2.6.1. Dual-stack is indeed easy to turn on but if you run MPLS and expect your IPv6 traffic to be labelled same way your IPv4 is (BGP-free core, MPLS EXP based QOS, etc.), this is not going to happen and one should look into 6PE instead.
>>
>> Other than that, nice summary.
>>
>> -- 
>> tarko
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>
>