
From nobody Tue Nov  1 09:00:09 2016
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE971294CE for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue,  1 Nov 2016 09:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.699
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X03PdPzlEy8P for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue,  1 Nov 2016 08:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2307F129486 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue,  1 Nov 2016 08:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0B82BB81C85; Tue,  1 Nov 2016 08:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
To: dave@juniper.net, cpignata@cisco.com, rodunn@cisco.com, bclaise@cisco.com,  joelja@bogus.com, gunter@vandevelde.cc, evyncke@cisco.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20161101155957.0B82BB81C85@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue,  1 Nov 2016 08:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/u9oy2j3A6iSyvrz0cZnkxU1IoC0>
Cc: opsec@ietf.org, hugocanalli@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [OPSEC] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6192 (4851)
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 16:00:07 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6192,
"Protecting the Router Control Plane".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6192&eid=4851

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Hugo Leonardo Canalli <hugocanalli@gmail.com>

Section: A.2

Original Text
-------------
   term ebgp-reply {
                   from {
                       source-prefix-list {
                           EBGP-NEIGHBORS;
                       }
                       protocol tcp;
                       port bgp;
                   }
                   then accept;
               }

Corrected Text
--------------
   term ebgp-reply {
                   from {
                       source-prefix-list {
                           EBGP-NEIGHBORS;
                       }
                       protocol tcp;
                       tcp-established;
                       source-port bgp;
                   }
                   then accept;
               }



Notes
-----
Thare are a security question in that firewall relating to bgp reply.
Any neighbor that fake a tcp source port to 179 can access any router port, by example ssh.
Need to add the line tcp-established. Would be also better to add source-port bgp since bgp protocol uses the 179 port to destination. Add the fix to all bgps, including ipv6.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6192 (draft-ietf-opsec-protect-control-plane-06)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Protecting the Router Control Plane
Publication Date    : March 2011
Author(s)           : D. Dugal, C. Pignataro, R. Dunn
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG


From nobody Wed Nov  9 04:12:03 2016
Return-Path: <session_request_developers@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietf.org
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C8A1297C2; Wed,  9 Nov 2016 04:12:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "\"IETF Meeting Session Request Tool\"" <session_request_developers@ietf.org>
To: <session-request@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.37.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <147869352118.25247.15472317546019810846.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 04:12:01 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/9MAj8NTnAVIk7m4hpovxDkMGCZM>
Cc: opsec@ietf.org, opsec-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSEC] opsec - Cancelling a meeting request for IETF 97
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 12:12:01 -0000

A request to cancel a meeting session has just been submitted by .


From nobody Fri Nov 11 01:47:51 2016
Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F4123128B44 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 01:47:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.017
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.017 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Vu32W0ADErg for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 01:47:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C59B6129412 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 01:37:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1982; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1478857075; x=1480066675; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=H3ocb2rAAPWSnVV5yZLJGKcL1cBFG9Pusy7wuYcB0JA=; b=F42BoqcWTa8EvGUcwn0hGYQLYLBilmq+fIeleSbGjSR8XX3DqobVTlv1 bbIbYeRw/+uxF4cX4dkzLRVPvtUitqvBJw+nE7qb0OVN3imxKyp5nNz0N vlEMPZyk9lBWcC65vM6K88bzeqkH5mb6svzXhBuIOnx+3S7filPwsvv3r k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DmAQAjkCVY/5tdJa1dGwEBAQMBAQEJA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBgnNAAQEBAQEfgV6NN6ZKgw2CD4IHhkCBeD8UAQIBAQEBAQEBYh0LhFgQI2g?= =?us-ascii?q?BCwE+AgQwJwSIcqAxj3yCMotdAQEBBwEBAQEjhj6MJoJdBZo7AZBVkByRRgEeN?= =?us-ascii?q?4EChTSHQIEMAQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,620,1473120000";  d="scan'208,217";a="168225443"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Nov 2016 09:37:54 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (xch-rtp-015.cisco.com [64.101.220.155]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uAB9bsmd009895 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <opsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 09:37:54 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 04:37:54 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 04:37:54 -0500
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: No OPSEC WG meeting in Seoul
Thread-Index: AQHSO/9GcliITO75b0yGsCViXANuRQ==
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 09:37:53 +0000
Message-ID: <D44B4FFE.87484%evyncke@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.3.160329
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.55.56.6]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D44B4FFE87484evynckeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/jlOB08RxQC_-I2Gbfc3H_DKJo9M>
Subject: [OPSEC] No OPSEC WG meeting in Seoul
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 09:47:51 -0000

--_000_D44B4FFE87484evynckeciscocom_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

RGVhciBhbGwsDQoNCkFzIHdlIGhhZCBhIG1vc3RseSBlbXB0eSBhZ2VuZGEgYW5kIGFzIHdlIHdl
cmUgZmVhcmluZyBub3QgdG9vIHBhcnRpY2lwYW50cyBvbiB0aGUgbGFzdCBzZXNzaW9uIG9mIGEg
bG9uZyB3ZWVrLCBHdW50ZXIgYW5kIEkgKGluIGFncmVlbWVudCB3aXRoIEpvZWwpIGhhdmUgZGVj
aWRlZCB0byBjYW5jZWwgb3VyIFdHIG1lZXRpbmcgaW4gU2VvdWwuDQoNClRoaXMgc2hvdWxkIG9i
dmlvdXNseSBub3QgcHJldmVudCBhbnkgc2lkZSBtZWV0aW5ncyA6LSkNCg0KV2Ugd2lzaCB5b3Ug
YW4gaW50ZXJlc3Rpbmcgd2VlayBpbiBTZW91bCwNCg0KU2VlIHlvdSB0aGVyZQ0KDQoNCi3DqXJp
YyAmIC1ndW50ZXINCg0K

--_000_D44B4FFE87484evynckeciscocom_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <DE39D4A6F55C364FBB7AB12AB575B523@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
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--_000_D44B4FFE87484evynckeciscocom_--


From nobody Tue Nov 15 14:08:42 2016
Return-Path: <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF6D12960B for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:08:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nistgov.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yrVDXNcEoHBN for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:08:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gcc01-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-cy1gcc01on0122.outbound.protection.outlook.com [23.103.200.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95FFE1295AF for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:08:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nistgov.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nist-gov; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=uG3+47yX77Ekl09VLkHOc2rSdNFeBT9SrTnaI1KA6jA=; b=b0AJS0P0ed6BH5D6YdfbGOWG0lJrvzAd+Zoqn3CtdPWyuK0vaO1rptn/GJL/1OuEJTgxqbI4qDN2snTKZs9A7ItuTIx0G/yWSZ1Mm2l3G2tzgf8Ry8viTvhmyJNBmBJF5p2P26vjia9c9DpfsjH+60qu5gB1wSHDWKk1+LBlzMs=
Received: from DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.161.252.145) by DM2PR09MB0448.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.161.252.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.721.10; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 22:08:33 +0000
Received: from DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.252.145]) by DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.252.145]) with mapi id 15.01.0721.015; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 22:08:33 +0000
From: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
To: "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OPSEC] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-sriram-opsec-urpf-improvements-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSP4xP/4vatwG33UGfZZWlTfPClA==
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 22:08:33 +0000
Message-ID: <DM2PR09MB0446FBA40020ABD778C5220C84BF0@DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov; 
x-originating-ip: [132.163.221.161]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM2PR09MB0448; 7:eSwI0cEjlJehnNy/QMZ4JtUp/TlvR2JbHKoq2tsTfz+E/ttnjfJaJW045uG8kRjpyZwFNkkIzLeks3qg0VBjM2IH0aUIjZrQD0V6gIWtA9Kl1Rnr43YQiz557Tp13HUr/M2RfG/XpBnGK9WCHj3PriyjNZWvtWfKZARcFfPvXIBHx9Nte03hqxSh5p2SGICcuao0B55TToZi3Im/NPuzgErcr2ZWGPQ6w8WNdpe+QDPzsX9yOMr4AkKbh9B7aW/CgjTpw0zLSm1anzPMc4wURAVJLVYUCNLATdSYr/qB/qB3C8XbzgtIfyY2UczKsZKVM+35gKYycU075PKbE+biB3V3s2pbfVpm99e4Fxpezhg=
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 92894397-cb8e-4e28-c604-08d40da3f08b
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001);SRVR:DM2PR09MB0448;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM2PR09MB0448519844F7709FEC5AA0EB84BF0@DM2PR09MB0448.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6060326)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(6061324); SRVR:DM2PR09MB0448; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM2PR09MB0448; 
x-forefront-prvs: 012792EC17
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(189002)(199003)(5660300001)(3660700001)(230783001)(7696004)(110136003)(92566002)(7736002)(8676002)(305945005)(6116002)(102836003)(6916009)(7846002)(450100001)(68736007)(558084003)(97736004)(3280700002)(86362001)(6506003)(87936001)(107886002)(2900100001)(2906002)(189998001)(77096005)(8936002)(54356999)(50986999)(3846002)(101416001)(106116001)(106356001)(9686002)(105586002)(74316002)(81156014)(66066001)(33656002)(76576001)(1730700003)(122556002)(99286002)(2351001)(81166006)(2501003)(5640700001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR09MB0448; H:DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords;  MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; 
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nist.gov does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nist.gov
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Nov 2016 22:08:33.1554 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2ab5d82f-d8fa-4797-a93e-054655c61dec
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM2PR09MB0448
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/i8fogRbYOzyfVu0aHnd7ftxHiFM>
Subject: [OPSEC] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-sriram-opsec-urpf-improvements-00.txt
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 22:08:41 -0000

Just in case someone on this list is not on GROW list,
there a presentation on this today GROW.
Also there been some good discussion on this work there:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/threads.html#03661=20

Sriram


From nobody Wed Nov 23 00:37:41 2016
Return-Path: <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D481293D8 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 00:37:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.902
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SygCNvNC8TnH for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 00:37:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 946DD129634 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 00:37:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fr712umx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.210.45]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 8C5B6CDE2B27 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 08:37:33 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by fr712umx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO-o) with ESMTP id uAN8bXBC017033 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <opsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 08:37:35 GMT
Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712wxchhub03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.74]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id uAN8bKg0014318 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <opsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 08:37:33 GMT
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA06.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.2.227]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:37:18 +0100
From: "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
To: "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: NomCom 2016-2017: LastCall for Feedback
Thread-Index: AQHSRWTMNIU6TH2yH0KQckJQqn78RQ==
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 08:37:17 +0000
Message-ID: <0CF52FA7-38CC-4AFD-879E-BB202BAE5369@alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <6772EA984C05424296299C5E4C07478B@exchange.lucent.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/5iVaIzrqH9d7NOVUS0NXwL-C8Xc>
Subject: [OPSEC] NomCom 2016-2017: LastCall for Feedback
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 08:37:40 -0000
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