Subject: Re: [OSPF] [Bier] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions-08.txt

From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 11:57:58 +0000

Hi Xiejing, (+OSPF List),

On 10/20/17, 5:20 AM, "BIER on behalf of Xiejingrong"
<[email-masked] on behalf of [email-masked]> wrote:

>HI, all:
>
>About draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions-08.txt,
>In chap 2.1, BIER Sub-TLV is defined as a sub-tlv of the Extended Prefix
>TLV (defined in RFC7684).
>In chap 2.2, The BIER MPLS Encapsulation Sub-TLV is a Sub-TLV of the BIER
>Sub-TLV.
>In chap 2.3, The BIER Tree Type Sub-TLV is a Sub-TLV of the BIER Sub-TLV.
>In chap 2.4, The BIER sub-domain BSL conversion Sub-TLV is a Sub-TLV of
>the BIER Sub-TLV. 
>In chap 4, The document requests three new allocations from the OSPF
>Extended Prefix sub-TLV registry as defined in [RFC7684].
>
>Should the allocation for 3 Sub-TLVs of the BIER Sub-TLV be from some
>registry, other than the OSPF Extended Prefix sub-TLV registry?

No. With 64K Sub-TLV types, it is not likely that we will run out any time
soon and some of the Sub-TLVs apply to multiple TLVs.

Thanks,
Acee 
>_______________________________________________
>BIER mailing list
>[email-masked]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier