From internet-drafts@ietf.org Sun Feb 2 08:03:55 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2082C1A0094; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 08:03:55 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5BanCrQAEpjU; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 08:03:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD1C1A00AE; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 08:03:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.0.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140202160350.21185.66563.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 08:03:50 -0800 Cc: p2psip@ietf.org Subject: [P2PSIP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-p2psip-service-discovery-10.txt X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 16:03:55 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Peer-to-Peer Session Initiation Protocol Working Group of the IETF. Title : Service Discovery Usage for REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) Authors : Jouni Maenpaa Gonzalo Camarillo Filename : draft-ietf-p2psip-service-discovery-10.txt Pages : 19 Date : 2014-02-02 Abstract: REsource LOcation and Discovery (RELOAD) does not define a generic service discovery mechanism as a part of the base protocol. This document defines how the Recursive Distributed Rendezvous (ReDiR) service discovery mechanism used in OpenDHT can be applied to RELOAD overlays to provide a generic service discovery mechanism. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-p2psip-service-discovery/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-p2psip-service-discovery-10 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-p2psip-service-discovery-10 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From internet-drafts@ietf.org Sun Feb 2 08:07:30 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 470241A00DE; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 08:07:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ERE1w7pwSuvw; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 08:07:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC87C1A0015; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 08:07:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.0.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140202160728.25967.20204.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 08:07:28 -0800 Cc: p2psip@ietf.org Subject: [P2PSIP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-p2psip-self-tuning-10.txt X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 16:07:30 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Peer-to-Peer Session Initiation Protocol Working Group of the IETF. Title : Self-tuning Distributed Hash Table (DHT) for REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) Authors : Jouni Maenpaa Gonzalo Camarillo Filename : draft-ietf-p2psip-self-tuning-10.txt Pages : 21 Date : 2014-02-02 Abstract: REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) is a peer-to-peer (P2P) signaling protocol that provides an overlay network service. Peers in a RELOAD overlay network collectively run an overlay algorithm to organize the overlay, and to store and retrieve data. This document describes how the default topology plugin of RELOAD can be extended to support self-tuning, that is, to adapt to changing operating conditions such as churn and network size. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-p2psip-self-tuning/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-p2psip-self-tuning-10 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-p2psip-self-tuning-10 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Fri Feb 14 06:19:03 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5994B1A0267; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 06:18:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QjxV0ztRtqgl; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 06:18:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 074A01A02AA; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 06:18:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.0.0.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140214141842.15238.32396.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 06:18:42 -0800 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/p2psip/xu-vaQ5wtAHq18h_MFvo9tM-AR8 Cc: p2psip@ietf.org Subject: [P2PSIP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-14.txt X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:18:56 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Peer-to-Peer Session Initiation Protocol Working Group of the IETF. Title : P2P Overlay Diagnostics Authors : Haibin Song Jiang Xingfeng Roni Even David A. Bryan Yi Sun Filename : draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-14.txt Pages : 28 Date : 2014-02-14 Abstract: This document describes mechanisms for P2P overlay diagnostics. It defines extensions to the RELOAD P2PSIP base protocol to collect diagnostic information, and details the protocol specifications for these extensions. Useful diagnostic information for connection and node status monitoring is also defined. The document also describes the usage scenarios and provides examples of how these methods are used to perform diagnostics in P2P overlay networks. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-14 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-14 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Sat Feb 15 10:30:53 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3924C1A026A for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 10:30:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.977 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jPv3-OiUL1MY for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 10:30:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ob0-f177.google.com (mail-ob0-f177.google.com [209.85.214.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13C61A0259 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 10:30:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id wp18so15114543obc.8 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 10:30:48 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=B+3tItmKipdQznW43ZOazoGpJC8fyfCmYybrr03ObbA=; b=Tjp6gmR2xHHD3qY+7yRln0pSXDEUy2Qw0JMMuaue/0eT3RB1yroE+arqnYZp9zEqVM g3U1DeWtM1o9qOLAs1iJ6QmsAhkJv/Y6UGQAN+NwMDRI1cy0zCnU+AajlR40rA9tbkJu F9otgzp1quMuEReekO/2mgmZl96B1tvyoMUrSMV1QvQEKHvT5TnEbiUMhFC04r1uE7lB z2OlrdRIxSaxgS6C2Y4MsymIUuwQR/dyKITUJdnTEUX7PiicDBLyKbYBoAJhYoIvwRNB rHBlLDbMbfznbgmbPSb9e108NV3+UdqYkoJsrd7K5jmS1SVX9yPk9dN/pbC5mYE+DD8Z soYA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlm1VumGaGAKAgrNhF1dUscTwhPA+k52188Lqmsq2mNYWu+EDRdYXvOlagQUylQGyycVLEG MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.134.200 with SMTP id pm8mr12499885oeb.40.1392489047958; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 10:30:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.69.102 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 10:30:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20140208001733.724FB7FC39B@rfc-editor.org> References: <20140208001733.724FB7FC39B@rfc-editor.org> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 13:30:47 -0500 Message-ID: From: Richard Barnes To: RFC Errata System Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b4178310ebe5404f2761f68 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/p2psip/wNAznW1CYkQitdKuK5p7Tx4IMc0 Cc: Cullen Jennings , p2psip@ietf.org Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6940 (3885) X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 18:30:52 -0000 --047d7b4178310ebe5404f2761f68 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I have marked as Verified. I wonder if this is the shortest time from publication to erratum? On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 7:17 PM, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6940, > "REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) Base Protocol". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6940&eid=3885 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Cullen Jennings > > Section: 14.9 > > Original Text > ------------- > | Reserved | 0x8000..0xFFFE | RFC 6940 | > > Corrected Text > -------------- > | Reserved | 0x8000..0xFFFF | RFC 6940 | > > Notes > ----- > Clearly there was some confusion and at least one of the authors thought > that 0xFFFE was the largest 16 bit integer when in fact it should have been > 0xFFFF. I would like to thank Pearl Liang for catching this mistake. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6940 (draft-ietf-p2psip-base-26) > -------------------------------------- > Title : REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) Base > Protocol > Publication Date : January 2014 > Author(s) : C. Jennings, B. Lowekamp, Ed., E. Rescorla, S. > Baset, H. Schulzrinne > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Peer-to-Peer Session Initiation Protocol > Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > --047d7b4178310ebe5404f2761f68 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have marked as Verified. =A0I wonder if this is the shor= test time from publication to erratum?

=
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 7:17 PM, RFC Errata S= ystem <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
The following errata report has been submitt= ed for RFC6940,
"REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) Base Protocol".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc= =3D6940&eid=3D3885

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Cullen Jennings <fluffy= @cisco.com>

Section: 14.9

Original Text
-------------
=A0 =A0| Reserved =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0| = 0x8000..0xFFFE | =A0RFC 6940 |

Corrected Text
--------------
=A0 =A0| Reserved =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0| = 0x8000..0xFFFF | =A0RFC 6940 |

Notes
-----
Clearly there was some confusion and at least one of the authors thought th= at 0xFFFE was the largest 16 bit integer when in fact it should have been 0= xFFFF. I would like to thank Pearl Liang for catching this mistake.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, plea= se
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--------------------------------------
RFC6940 (draft-ietf-p2psip-base-26)
--------------------------------------
Title =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 : REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD= ) Base Protocol
Publication Date =A0 =A0: January 2014
Author(s) =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 : C. Jennings, B. Lowekamp, Ed., E. Rescorla,= S. Baset, H. Schulzrinne
Category =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0: PROPOSED STANDARD
Source =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0: Peer-to-Peer Session Initiation Protoco= l
Area =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0: Real-time Applications and Infrastruc= ture
Stream =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0: IETF
Verifying Party =A0 =A0 : IESG

--047d7b4178310ebe5404f2761f68--