From nobody Wed Apr 1 05:32:48 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670161A8AAB for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 05:32:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AHlNqhpbvsVS for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 05:32:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0123.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.123]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 739071A8AA4 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 05:32:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SN2PR0501MB1070.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.59.15) by SN2PR0501MB1070.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.59.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.118.21; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:32:43 +0000 Received: from SN2PR0501MB1070.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.59.15]) by SN2PR0501MB1070.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.59.15]) with mapi id 15.01.0118.022; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:32:43 +0000 From: Yimin Shen To: "stbryant@cisco.com" , "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pals] IPR Poll draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon Thread-Index: AQHQavRLD5+7haX270yR8Vc8Tg5KZ504GK8A Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:32:43 +0000 Message-ID: References: <55195B00.6060505@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <55195B00.6060505@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.12] authentication-results: cisco.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SN2PR0501MB1070; x-forefront-antispam-report: BMV:1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(164054003)(13464003)(102836002)(54356999)(106116001)(2656002)(46102003)(19580395003)(19580405001)(15975445007)(86362001)(74316001)(2900100001)(2950100001)(87936001)(62966003)(76576001)(77156002)(40100003)(2501003)(122556002)(66066001)(50986999)(33656002)(99286002)(76176999)(230783001)(92566002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SN2PR0501MB1070; H:SN2PR0501MB1070.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5002010)(5005006); SRVR:SN2PR0501MB1070; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN2PR0501MB1070; x-forefront-prvs: 053315510E Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Apr 2015 12:32:43.7261 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN2PR0501MB1070 Archived-At: Cc: "pals@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] IPR Poll draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:32:47 -0000 Chairs, WG, I'm not aware of any undisclosed IPR that is relevant to this draft. Thanks, /Yimin Shen -----Original Message----- From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:18 AM To: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org Cc: pals@ietf.org Subject: [Pals] IPR Poll draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon This is to start an IPR Poll for draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon Please can each of the authors reply to me and the PALS list stating that t= hey know of no IPR that has not already been disclosed that is relevant to = this draft. Similarly please can any member of the PALS WG that knows of any relevant I= PR also disclose it or state that they have started the disclosure process. I will close this poll on the later of: 13th April 2015 and when I have hea= rd from all authors. Thanks Stewart _______________________________________________ Pals mailing list Pals@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals From nobody Wed Apr 1 06:28:40 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2115F1A9089 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 06:28:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MALFORMED_FREEMAIL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rUgw65pi-v_L for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 06:28:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yk0-x22b.google.com (mail-yk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF9DA1A8ADB for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 06:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ykeg184 with SMTP id g184so13789736yke.2 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 06:28:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ARNwOmtSvDBL3GW+7XtfxxRrG59bZ0uX+6nReK0Eg+Q=; b=JFxcyd93FYOAiNDQ6wOH3XHaqAktYjIeWz0vBV9v3B4AOEWEYv8oM9JutzB/inXMy2 TPZ+aXzsEbtudcD7exhym+3+v59AymltpsFwVLGYrLRv/r4RVll5Lz0/agQlBaa7clxV xfHubo01Lzz2ftGnx8mAKdpIjyCS1en8HUEB4Bt1nfbPMSTCXKUOLgCs/p9lkDusS4z0 mcYnqgLf2q3J1rTnplGOrpME6OXbq3YLS3mKaey2tlVwUkPtr0XVVmgc2DVYrv48xkwP PejQ3HHEFOn5sEBkEUkJDCx3NZFk6n9EKohwNhY0gvRVnYNjkcWUtXtiqRjiSa+BvJBk ji4w== X-Received: by 10.236.201.46 with SMTP id a34mr43125611yho.86.1427894915216; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 06:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.212] (rrcs-97-76-236-4.se.biz.rr.com. [97.76.236.4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c26sm1353765yhb.20.2015.04.01.06.28.31 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Apr 2015 06:28:34 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.8.150116 Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 09:28:27 -0400 From: Edwin Mallette To: Jiangyuanlong , "stbryant@cisco.com" , "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [Pals] IPR Poll draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon References: <55195B00.6060505@cisco.com> <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A8C6A2A@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A8C6A2A@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: Cc: "pals@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] IPR Poll draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 13:28:38 -0000 Good day, I=B9m not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this draft. Cordially, Ed > >-----Original Message----- >From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant >Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:18 PM >To: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org >Cc: pals@ietf.org >Subject: [Pals] IPR Poll draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon > >This is to start an IPR Poll for draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon > >Please can each of the authors reply to me and the PALS list >stating that they know of no IPR that has not already been >disclosed that is relevant to this draft. > >Similarly please can any member of the PALS WG that >knows of any relevant IPR also disclose it or state that >they have started the disclosure process. > >I will close this poll on the later of: 13th April 2015 and when >I have heard from all authors. > >Thanks > >Stewart > >_______________________________________________ >Pals mailing list >Pals@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals From nobody Wed Apr 1 20:38:26 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C317E1B2A2E for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 20:38:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.311 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RELAY_IS_221=2.222, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QOlVSJM1xztC for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 20:38:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta2.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 314241B2A34 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 20:38:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.17]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app05-12005 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee5551cb9abbaa-41e74; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 11:38:19 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee5551cb9abbaa-41e74 X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000 Received: from cmccPC (unknown[10.2.52.215]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr09-12009 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee9551cb9ab786-4e1e2; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 11:38:19 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee9551cb9ab786-4e1e2 From: "weiqiang cheng" To: "'Edwin Mallette'" , "'Jiangyuanlong'" , , References: <55195B00.6060505@cisco.com> <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A8C6A2A@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 11:38:19 +0800 Message-ID: <004f01d06cf6$767c0be0$637423a0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AdBsgPZxmMACFwHWRqG2pbZnE0A4HwAdWxng Content-Language: zh-cn Archived-At: Cc: pals@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pals] IPR Poll draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 03:38:25 -0000 I'm not aware of any undisclosed IPR that is relevant to this draft. B.R. Weiqiang Cheng > >-----Original Message----- >From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant >Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:18 PM >To: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org >Cc: pals@ietf.org >Subject: [Pals] IPR Poll draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon > >This is to start an IPR Poll for draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon > >Please can each of the authors reply to me and the PALS list >stating that they know of no IPR that has not already been >disclosed that is relevant to this draft. > >Similarly please can any member of the PALS WG that >knows of any relevant IPR also disclose it or state that >they have started the disclosure process. > >I will close this poll on the later of: 13th April 2015 and when >I have heard from all authors. > >Thanks > >Stewart > >_______________________________________________ >Pals mailing list >Pals@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals From nobody Tue Apr 7 18:02:12 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0C81B2A6C for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 18:02:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.509 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RLDmrJa_JNuj for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 18:02:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DB851B2A69 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 18:02:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4819; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1428454930; x=1429664530; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=KfaNgzZUSH0TNO2Iau5EAGbt7l6OvV5evF0YTsLCORQ=; b=AR5wdVgsTz6XEEJQbOebkaSFIzOmqM/i4R10vJoqUbkymZ4QTn5zlCni +ckL/S0zeceXQcjem2xeI6WyU4C4kmadf3oycGrUkWDHnSWlnG2mQv0xe eu4JVEgTXa2tYiKlu/R8qIQ163HtUzuT9tBFDhmZmzWmRGXTWyAe6tfjJ M=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BUBwDMfSRV/5RdJa1ZA4JFCjlSXAXDCYI3AQuFe4EwTAEBAQEBAX6EJWYDAR0EAQw7IhcUEwQTiCoNpVCRHpUcAQEIAgEfBIExjg8RASUGFiiCHE2BMwWOY4IRg3iGD4EdOoJ9kAcig29vAYEDBxcifwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,541,1422921600"; d="scan'208,217";a="410006947" Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Apr 2015 01:02:09 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com [173.36.12.87]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t38128p3025968 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 01:02:08 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.4.33]) by xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com ([173.36.12.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 20:02:08 -0500 From: "Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)" To: "pals@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Comments about draft-brissette-pals-pw-fec-label-request-00? Thread-Index: AQHQcZeiqq6twRZVgUq90apo/bs6mA== Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 01:02:08 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.86.244.78] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D149F64D50303pbrissetciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: [Pals] Comments about draft-brissette-pals-pw-fec-label-request-00? X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 01:02:11 -0000 --_000_D149F64D50303pbrissetciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Folks, We are about to provide version 01 to draft-brissette-pals-pw-fec-label-req= uest-00. I=91ll like to gather more feedback on this draft. Please feel free to comment. Regards, Patrice [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/est2014/logo_06.= png?ct=3D1406640631632] Patrice Brissette TECHNICAL LEADER.ENGINEERING pbrisset@cisco.com Phone: +1 613 254 3336 Cisco Systems Canada Co. / Les Systemes Cisco Canada CIE Canada Cisco.com [http://www.cisco.com/assets/swa/img/thinkbeforeyouprint.gif] Think before = you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole us= e of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by= others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or a= uthorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply= email and delete all copies of this message. Please click here for Company Registration Information. --_000_D149F64D50303pbrissetciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <0E7E5C2CFF202B4D806A86CC04BBB061@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Folks,

We are about to provide version 01 to draft-brissette-pals-pw-fec-labe= l-request-00.

I=91ll like to gather more feedback on this draft.
Please feel free to comment.


Regards,

Patrice

   

Patrice Brissette
TECHNICAL LEADER.ENGINEERING

pbrisset@cisco.com
Phone: +1 613 254 3336

Cisco Systems Canada Co. / Les Systemes Cisco Canada CIE Canada
Cisco.com
Think before you print.

This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole= use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure= by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (o= r authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies= of this message.

Please click here for Company Registration Information.

--_000_D149F64D50303pbrissetciscocom_-- From nobody Thu Apr 9 16:22:32 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC501B36C5 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 16:22:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.907 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, CN_BODY_103=0.327, CN_BODY_35=0.339, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LjxbUEFt46lL for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 16:22:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sendh.mailex.chinaunicom.cn (sendh.mailex.chinaunicom.cn [210.53.66.231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA601B36C8 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 16:22:26 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 0a000f36-f79a16d000006cb5-de-552709b046b9 Received: from m10-cen-mlhub04.cnc.intra ( [10.0.192.44]) by sendh.mailex.chinaunicom.cn (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id EF.56.27829.0B907255; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 07:22:25 +0800 (HKT) Received: from M10-HQ-MLCH02.hq.cnc.intra (10.0.15.27) by m10-cen-mlhub04.cnc.intra (10.0.192.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.213.0; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 07:22:24 +0800 Received: from GTZhou-PC (222.161.59.206) by M10-HQ-MLCH02.hq.cnc.intra (10.0.15.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.213.0; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 07:22:24 +0800 Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 07:22:38 +0800 From: zhouguangtao To: "stbryant@cisco.com" , "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" References: <55195B00.6060505@cisco.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Has-Attach: no X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.0.1.91[cn] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <201504100722366841514@chinaunicom.cn> content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====mte=boundary=number=102046=====" X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrPIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXCxXBAR3cjp3qoweczHBZNt94zWaz5t47J 4tzTOYwOzB5Tfm9k9Viy5CeTx5fLn9kCmKPqbBLz8vJLEktSFVJSi5NtlYIz0/MSS0qLUhX8 S0uS8kvzUpQUMlNslYyVFApyEpNTc1PzSmyVEgsKUoEydlwKGMAGqCwzTyE1Lzk/JTMv3VYp NMRN10LJ7umypmfz5jxrWvFyyswX69c/61v6bMq2hCssGd8e97EWvDGsWNz7g7mBcZVeFyMn h4SAicSKxU9ZIGwxiQv31rOB2EICBxglFn3U7WLkArK3MEqc/P2eGcJZyChx5/trJpAqFgFV iVkXDoB1swkYSLx/uosdpEhEoJlR4umDz0AdHBzMAsoSB5+ATRUG2tbz5iMjxAYNiRvtl1gh NvNKzGiHuUJA4uaWCWwQtpzE9lNrweK8AoISJ2c+gbKNJJbv/gNmMwuESTQeu88EM3Ppo8XM ExiFZiFpmYWkDMLWkpjX8BvKVpSY0v2QHcLWlLgy+RCUrS2xbOFr5gWMbKsYuYJ93S2MLQx0 /U02MYIjn99sB+OPJa6HGAU4GJV4eB+0qoUKsSaWFVfmHmKU4GBWEuH9uBAoxJuSWFmVWpQf X1Sak1p8iNEUGGQTmaVEk/OBSSmvJN7QxMjIzMjQ1NzC3MBQSZx3X4hUqJBAOjCVZKemFqQW wfQxcXBKNTAG1vc4m8zjmOjY2Tk9uYdh64JX58Sm7yvQFbL/yqVrcpih4tSSloSpB/teLVN+ ebeG/+9ljvfKO6atvvd7g7fLjk/1/n6PTquuE4xo/XNR7sHuo4q/51l7nIubqvCWdROj81mn ulOOF/UuZnUsZY6/feJbvqv8JBn59u4vMwLCDPadDF8/0bZViaU4I9FQi7moOBEABJeq7BID AAA= Archived-At: Cc: "pals@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] IPR Poll draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 23:22:30 -0000 --=====mte=boundary=number=102046===== Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====mte=boundary=number=102047=====" Content-Disposition: inline --=====mte=boundary=number=102047===== Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline 5aaC5p6c5oKo6ZSZ6K+v5o6l5pS25LqG6K+l6YKu5Lu277yM6K+36YCa6L+H55S15a2Q6YKu 5Lu256uL5Y2z6YCa55+l5oiR5Lus44CC6K+35Zue5aSN6YKu5Lu25YiwaHFzLXNwbWNAY2hp bmF1bmljb20uY27vvIzljbPlj6/ku6XpgIDorqLmraTpgq7ku7bjgILmiJHku6zlsIbnq4vl jbPlsIbmgqjnmoTkv6Hmga/ku47miJHku6znmoTlj5HpgIHnm67lvZXkuK3liKDpmaTjgIIN CklmIHlvdSBoYXZlIHJlY2VpdmVkIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgaW4gZXJyb3IgcGxlYXNlIG5vdGlm eSB1cyBpbW1lZGlhdGVseSBieSBlLW1haWwuIFBsZWFzZSByZXBseSB0byBocXMtc3BtY0Bj aGluYXVuaWNvbS5jbiBpZiB5b3Ugd2FudCB0byB1bnN1YnNjcmliZSBmcm9tIHRoaXMgbWFp bC4gV2Ugd2lsbCBpbW1lZGlhdGVseSByZW1vdmUgeW91ciBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBmcm9tIG91 ciBzZW5kaW5nIGNhdGFsb2d1ZS4= --=====mte=boundary=number=102047===== Content-type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline PHA+5aaC5p6c5oKo6ZSZ6K+v5o6l5pS25LqG6K+l6YKu5Lu277yM6K+36YCa6L+H55S15a2Q 6YKu5Lu256uL5Y2z6YCa55+l5oiR5Lus44CC6K+35Zue5aSN6YKu5Lu25YiwaHFzLXNwbWNA Y2hpbmF1bmljb20uY27vvIzljbPlj6/ku6XpgIDorqLmraTpgq7ku7bjgILmiJHku6zlsIbn q4vljbPlsIbmgqjnmoTkv6Hmga/ku47miJHku6znmoTlj5HpgIHnm67lvZXkuK3liKDpmaTj gIINCklmIHlvdSBoYXZlIHJlY2VpdmVkIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgaW4gZXJyb3IgcGxlYXNlIG5v dGlmeSB1cyBpbW1lZGlhdGVseSBieSBlLW1haWwuIFBsZWFzZSByZXBseSB0byBocXMtc3Bt Y0BjaGluYXVuaWNvbS5jbiBpZiB5b3Ugd2FudCB0byB1bnN1YnNjcmliZSBmcm9tIHRoaXMg bWFpbC4gV2Ugd2lsbCBpbW1lZGlhdGVseSByZW1vdmUgeW91ciBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBmcm9t IG91ciBzZW5kaW5nIGNhdGFsb2d1ZS48L3A+ --=====mte=boundary=number=102047=====-- --=====mte=boundary=number=102046===== Content-type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: attachment From: zhouguangtao To: "stbryant@cisco.com" , "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" CC: "pals@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] IPR Poll draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 07:22:38 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart136542220311_=----" ------=_001_NextPart136542220311_=---- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" content-transfer-encoding: base64 SGkgYWxsLA0KDQpJIGFtIG5vdCBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgdW5kaXNjbG9zZWQgSVBSIHJlbGV2 YW50IHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQuIA0KDQpUaGFua3MsDQpHdWFuZ3RhbyAgWmhvdQ0KU2VuaW9y IEVuZ2luZWVyIA0KTmV0d29yayBUZWNobm9sb2d5IFJlc2VhcmNoIEluc3RpdHV0ZSBvZiBD aGluYSBVbmljb20NCg0KRnJvbTogU3Rld2FydCBCcnlhbnQNCkRhdGU6IDIwMTUtMDMtMzAg MjI6MTcNClRvOiBkcmFmdC1qaWFuZy1wd2UzLW1jLXBvbkB0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZw0KQ0M6 IHBhbHNAaWV0Zi5vcmcNClN1YmplY3Q6IFtQYWxzXSBJUFIgUG9sbCBkcmFmdC1qaWFuZy1w d2UzLW1jLXBvbg0KVGhpcyBpcyB0byBzdGFydCBhbiBJUFIgUG9sbCBmb3IgIGRyYWZ0LWpp YW5nLXB3ZTMtbWMtcG9uDQoNClBsZWFzZSBjYW4gZWFjaCBvZiB0aGUgYXV0aG9ycyByZXBs eSB0byBtZSBhbmQgdGhlIFBBTFMgbGlzdA0Kc3RhdGluZyB0aGF0IHRoZXkga25vdyBvZiBu byBJUFIgdGhhdCBoYXMgbm90IGFscmVhZHkgYmVlbg0KZGlzY2xvc2VkIHRoYXQgaXMgcmVs ZXZhbnQgdG8gdGhpcyBkcmFmdC4NCg0KU2ltaWxhcmx5IHBsZWFzZSBjYW4gYW55IG1lbWJl ciBvZiB0aGUgUEFMUyBXRyB0aGF0DQprbm93cyBvZiBhbnkgcmVsZXZhbnQgSVBSIGFsc28g ZGlzY2xvc2UgaXQgb3Igc3RhdGUgdGhhdA0KdGhleSBoYXZlIHN0YXJ0ZWQgdGhlIGRpc2Ns b3N1cmUgcHJvY2Vzcy4NCg0KSSB3aWxsIGNsb3NlIHRoaXMgcG9sbCBvbiB0aGUgbGF0ZXIg b2Y6IDEzdGggQXByaWwgMjAxNSBhbmQgd2hlbg0KSSBoYXZlIGhlYXJkIGZyb20gYWxsIGF1 dGhvcnMuDQoNClRoYW5rcw0KDQpTdGV3YXJ0DQoNCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQpQYWxzIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KUGFsc0BpZXRm Lm9yZw0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9wYWxzDQrI57n7 xPq07c7zvdPK1cHLuMPTyrz+o6zH682ouf2159fT08q8/sGivLTNqNaqztLDx6Gjx+u72Li0 08q8/rW9aHFzLXNwbWNAY2hpbmF1bmljb20uY26jrLy0v8nS1M3Ltqm0y9PKvP6ho87Sw8e9 q8GivLS9q8T6tcTQxc+itNPO0sPHtcS3osvNxL/CvNbQyb6z/aGjDQpJZiB5b3UgaGF2ZSBy ZWNlaXZlZCB0aGlzIGVtYWlsIGluIGVycm9yIHBsZWFzZSBub3RpZnkgdXMgaW1tZWRpYXRl bHkgYnkgZS1tYWlsLiBQbGVhc2UgcmVwbHkgdG8gaHFzLXNwbWNAY2hpbmF1bmljb20uY24g aWYgeW91IHdhbnQgdG8gdW5zdWJzY3JpYmUgZnJvbSB0aGlzIG1haWwuIFdlIHdpbGwgaW1t ZWRpYXRlbHkgcmVtb3ZlIHlvdXIgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gZnJvbSBvdXIgc2VuZGluZyBjYXRh bG9ndWUuDQo= ------=_001_NextPart136542220311_=---- Content-Type: text/html; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,
 
I am not aware of any undisclosed = IPR relevant to this draft. 
 
Thanks,
Guangtao  Zhou
Senior Engineer 
Network Technology Research Institute of Chi= na Unicom
 
Date: 2015-03-30 22:17
To: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc= -pon@tools.ietf.org
CC: pals@ietf.org
Subject: [Pals] IPR Poll=20 draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon
This is to start an IPR Poll for&n= bsp; draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon
 
Please can each of the authors reply&nb= sp;to me and the PALS list
stating that they know of no IPR t= hat has not already been
disclosed that is relevant to this draf= t.
 
Similarly please can any member of the&= nbsp;PALS WG that
knows of any relevant IPR also disclose=  it or state that
they have started the disclosure process.
 
I will close this poll on the late= r of: 13th April 2015 and when
I have heard from all authors.
 
Thanks
 
Stewart
 
_______________________________________________
Pals mailing list
Pals@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals
------=_001_NextPart136542220311_=------ --=====mte=boundary=number=102046=====-- From nobody Thu Apr 9 19:50:49 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3CC1A904F for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 19:50:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.102 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CPM9fqK7ie7y for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 19:50:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from corp.21cn.com (corp.forptr.21cn.com [121.14.129.36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CF91A9048 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 19:50:31 -0700 (PDT) HMM_SOURCE_IP: 10.28.101.8:52337.1372099415 HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000 HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP Received: from shenchb-nb (unknown [10.28.101.8]) by corp.21cn.com (HERMES) with ESMTP id 411B945C01E; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 10:50:12 +0800 (CST) Received: from shenchb-nb ([218.80.215.132]) by 21CN-ent8(MEDUSA 10.28.101.8) with ESMTP id 1428634213.3692 for jiangyuanlong@huawei.com ; Fri Apr 10 10:50:19 2015 0/X-Total-Score: -120: X-FILTER-SCORE: to=<8b8a828f889a96828f8d908f886189968298868a4f84908e949583939a828f9561848a9484904f84908e85938287954e8b8a828f884e919886544e8e844e91908f619590908d944f8a8695874f90938891828d94618a8695874f909388>, score=<1428634219p78ZaFG5hhhhhohhphh7hokUCQtKHybbbbbgbbkbbUbg> X-REAL-FROM: shencb@sttri.com.cn X-Receive-IP: 218.80.215.132 shencb@sttri.com.cn Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 10:50:10 +0800 From: shencb To: =?utf-8?B?6JKLeXVhbmxvbmc=?= , stbryant , "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" References: <55195B00.6060505@cisco.com>, <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A8C6A2A@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Has-Attach: no X-Mailer: Foxmail 7, 2, 6, 40[cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <2015041010500997535917@sttri.com.cn> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart581871646365_=----" Archived-At: Cc: "pals@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] IPR Poll draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 02:50:49 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_001_NextPart581871646365_=---- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 aGnvvIxldmVyeW9uZSwgSSB0aGluayB0aGUgSVBSIGlzIE9LLCB0b28uDQogICAgIEJlc3QgUmVn YXJkcyENCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgU2hlbiBDaGVuZ2JpbiAgICAg ICAgIA0KDQoNCg0K5rKI5oiQ5b2sIOS4u+S7uw0K5Y2a5aOr77yM5pWZ5o6I57qn6auY5belDQrk uK3lm73nlLXkv6HogqHku73mnInpmZDlhazlj7jkuIrmtbfnoJTnqbbpmaIg5Z+656GA572R57uc 6YOoIA0K5ZywICAgICAgIOWdgO+8muS4iua1t+W4gua1puS4nOaWsOWMuua1puS4nOWNl+i3rzE4 MzXlj7cNCumCriAgICAgICDnvJbvvJoyMDAxMjINCueUtSAgICAgICDor53vvJowMjEtMjg5NzAx NzYNCuaJiyAgICAgICDmnLrvvJoxODkxODU4ODc4OQ0K55S15a2Q6YKu566x77yac2hlbmNiQHN0 dHJpLmNvbS5jbg0KDQpDaGFtcGlvbihDaGVuZ2JpbikgU2hlbiBEaXJlY3Rvcg0KUGguRCwgU2Vu aW9yIEVuZ2luZWVyIChQcm9mZXNzb3IgR3JhZGUpDQpEZXB0LiBvZiBJbmZyYXN0cnVjdHVyZSBO ZXR3b3Jrcw0KU2hhbmdoYWkgUmVzZWFyY2ggSW5zdGl0dXRlIG9mIENoaW5hIFRlbGVjb20gQ29y cC4gTHRkLg0KQWRkOiAxODM1IFNvdXRoIFB1ZG9uZyBSb2FkLCBTaGFuZ2hhaSwgMjAwMTIyLCBD aGluYQ0KVGVsIDogKzg2IDIxIDI4OTcwMTc2DQpNb2JpbGU6ICs4NiAxODkxODU4ODc4OQ0KRS1t YWlsOiBzaGVuY2JAc3R0cmkuY29tLmNuDQogDQpGcm9tOiBKaWFuZ3l1YW5sb25nDQpEYXRlOiAy MDE1LTA0LTAxIDA5OjIxDQpUbzogc3RicnlhbnRAY2lzY28uY29tOyBkcmFmdC1qaWFuZy1wd2Uz LW1jLXBvbkB0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZw0KQ0M6IHBhbHNAaWV0Zi5vcmcNClN1YmplY3Q6IFJFOiBb UGFsc10gSVBSIFBvbGwgZHJhZnQtamlhbmctcHdlMy1tYy1wb24NCkhpIGFsbCwNCiANCkkgYW0g bm90IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSB1bmRpc2Nsb3NlZCBJUFIgcmVsZXZhbnQgdG8gdGhpcyBkcmFmdC4g DQogDQpSZWdhcmRzLA0KWXVhbmxvbmcNCiANCi0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQpG cm9tOiBQYWxzIFttYWlsdG86cGFscy1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXSBPbiBCZWhhbGYgT2YgU3Rl d2FydCBCcnlhbnQNClNlbnQ6IE1vbmRheSwgTWFyY2ggMzAsIDIwMTUgMTA6MTggUE0NClRvOiBk cmFmdC1qaWFuZy1wd2UzLW1jLXBvbkB0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZw0KQ2M6IHBhbHNAaWV0Zi5vcmcN ClN1YmplY3Q6IFtQYWxzXSBJUFIgUG9sbCBkcmFmdC1qaWFuZy1wd2UzLW1jLXBvbg0KIA0KVGhp cyBpcyB0byBzdGFydCBhbiBJUFIgUG9sbCBmb3IgIGRyYWZ0LWppYW5nLXB3ZTMtbWMtcG9uDQog DQpQbGVhc2UgY2FuIGVhY2ggb2YgdGhlIGF1dGhvcnMgcmVwbHkgdG8gbWUgYW5kIHRoZSBQQUxT IGxpc3QNCnN0YXRpbmcgdGhhdCB0aGV5IGtub3cgb2Ygbm8gSVBSIHRoYXQgaGFzIG5vdCBhbHJl YWR5IGJlZW4NCmRpc2Nsb3NlZCB0aGF0IGlzIHJlbGV2YW50IHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQuDQogDQpT aW1pbGFybHkgcGxlYXNlIGNhbiBhbnkgbWVtYmVyIG9mIHRoZSBQQUxTIFdHIHRoYXQNCmtub3dz IG9mIGFueSByZWxldmFudCBJUFIgYWxzbyBkaXNjbG9zZSBpdCBvciBzdGF0ZSB0aGF0DQp0aGV5 IGhhdmUgc3RhcnRlZCB0aGUgZGlzY2xvc3VyZSBwcm9jZXNzLg0KIA0KSSB3aWxsIGNsb3NlIHRo aXMgcG9sbCBvbiB0aGUgbGF0ZXIgb2Y6IDEzdGggQXByaWwgMjAxNSBhbmQgd2hlbg0KSSBoYXZl IGhlYXJkIGZyb20gYWxsIGF1dGhvcnMuDQogDQpUaGFua3MNCiANClN0ZXdhcnQNCiANCg== ------=_001_NextPart581871646365_=---- Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A
hi=EF=BC=8Ceveryone, I= think the IPR is OK, too.
     Best Regards!
                  &nbs= p;             Shen Chengbin     &= nbsp;   
=0A

=0A
=E6=B2= =88=E6=88=90=E5=BD=AC =E4=B8=BB=E4= =BB=BB
=E5=8D=9A=E5=A3=AB=EF=BC=8C=E6=95=99=E6=8E=88=E7= =BA=A7=E9=AB=98=E5=B7=A5
=E4=B8=AD=E5=9B=BD=E7=94=B5=E4= =BF=A1=E8=82=A1=E4=BB=BD=E6=9C=89=E9=99=90=E5=85=AC=E5=8F=B8=E4=B8=8A=E6= =B5=B7=E7=A0=94=E7=A9=B6=E9=99=A2 =E5=9F=BA=E7=A1=80=E7=BD=91=E7=BB=9C=E9= =83=A8 
=E5=9C=B0       =E5=9D=80=EF=BC=9A= =E4=B8=8A=E6=B5=B7=E5=B8=82=E6=B5=A6=E4=B8=9C=E6=96=B0=E5=8C=BA=E6=B5=A6= =E4=B8=9C=E5=8D=97=E8=B7=AF1835=E5=8F=B7
=E9=82=AE    =   =E7=BC=96=EF=BC=9A200122
=E7=94=B5       = =E8=AF=9D=EF=BC=9A021-28970176
=E6=89=8B       = =E6=9C=BA=EF=BC=9A18918588789
=E7=94=B5=E5=AD=90=E9=82=AE=E7=AE= =B1=EF=BC=9Ashencb@sttri.com.cn

Champion(Chengbin= ) Shen Director
Ph.D, Senior Engineer (Professor Grade)
Dept. of Infrastructure Networks<= /span>
Shanghai Research Instit= ute of China Telecom Corp. Ltd.
Add: 1835 South Pudong Road, Shanghai, 200122, China
<= div>Tel : +86 21 28970= 176
M= obile: +86 18918588789
E-mail: shencb@sttri.com.cn
=0A=
 
=0A
Regards,
=0A
Yuanlong
=0A
 =0A
-----Original Message-----
=0A
From: Pals [mailto:pals= -bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant
=0A
Sent: Monday, = March 30, 2015 10:18 PM
=0A
To: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.iet= f.org
=0A
Cc: pals@ietf.org
=0A
Subject: [Pals] IPR Poll= draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon
=0A
 
=0A
This is to start= an IPR Poll for  draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon
=0A
 
= =0A
Please can each of the authors reply to me and the PALS list
= =0A
stating that they know of no IPR that has not already been
= =0A
disclosed that is relevant to this draft.
=0A
 =0A
Similarly please can any member of the PALS WG that
=0A
= knows of any relevant IPR also disclose it or state that
=0A
they= have started the disclosure process.
=0A
 
=0A
I w= ill close this poll on the later of: 13th April 2015 and when
=0AI have heard from all authors.
=0A
 
=0A
Thanks=0A
 
=0A
Stewart
=0A
 
=0A
<= /blockquote>=0A ------=_001_NextPart581871646365_=------ From nobody Thu Apr 9 19:58:39 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E881A916B for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 19:58:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.198 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yUpYq0wfIOw2 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 19:58:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from corp.21cn.com (corp.forptr.21cn.com [121.14.133.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866641A9169 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 19:58:16 -0700 (PDT) HMM_SOURCE_IP: 10.28.101.8:35352.1075076276 HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000 HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP Received: from shenchb-nb (unknown [10.28.101.8]) by corp.21cn.com (HERMES) with ESMTP id 04DBF1520152; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 10:58:04 +0800 (CST) Received: from shenchb-nb ([218.80.215.132]) by 21CN-ent8-3(MEDUSA 10.28.101.8) with ESMTP id 1428634684.26005 for jiangyuanlong@huawei.com ; Fri Apr 10 10:58:06 2015 0/X-Total-Score: -120: X-FILTER-SCORE: to=<8b8a828f889a96828f8d908f886189968298868a4f84908e949583939a828f9561848a9484904f84908e85938287954e8b8a828f884e919886544e8e844e91908f619590908d944f8a8695874f90938891828d94618a8695874f909388>, score=<1428634686hh8hoS8ZxG6ikhhhhhohhSbbBbn6BWo9xRcbbbbbnbb6> X-REAL-FROM: shencb@sttri.com.cn X-Receive-IP: 218.80.215.132 shencb@sttri.com.cn Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 10:58:01 +0800 From: shencb To: =?UTF-8?B?6JKLeXVhbmxvbmc=?= , stbryant , "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" References: <55195B00.6060505@cisco.com>, <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A8C6A2A@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com>, <2015041010500997535917@sttri.com.cn> X-Priority: 3 X-Has-Attach: no X-Mailer: Foxmail 7, 2, 6, 40[cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <2015041010580006565119@sttri.com.cn> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart221033524715_=----" Archived-At: Cc: "pals@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] IPR Poll draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 02:58:38 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_001_NextPart221033524715_=---- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 aGksIGV2ZXJ5b25lLCBpbiBhZGRpdGlvbiwgSSBkaWQgbm90IGhlYXIgYW5kIGtub3cgcmVsZXZh bnQgSVBSIG5vdy4NCiAgICAgQmVzdCBSZWdhcmRzIQ0KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBTaGVuIENoZW5nYmluIA0KDQoNCuayiOaIkOW9 rCDkuLvku7sNCuWNmuWjq++8jOaVmeaOiOe6p+mrmOW3pQ0K5Lit5Zu955S15L+h6IKh5Lu95pyJ 6ZmQ5YWs5Y+45LiK5rW356CU56m26ZmiIOWfuuehgOe9kee7nOmDqCANCuWcsCAgICAgICDlnYDv vJrkuIrmtbfluILmtabkuJzmlrDljLrmtabkuJzljZfot68xODM15Y+3DQrpgq4gICAgICAg57yW 77yaMjAwMTIyDQrnlLUgICAgICAg6K+d77yaMDIxLTI4OTcwMTc2DQrmiYsgICAgICAg5py677ya MTg5MTg1ODg3ODkNCueUteWtkOmCrueuse+8mnNoZW5jYkBzdHRyaS5jb20uY24NCg0KQ2hhbXBp b24oQ2hlbmdiaW4pIFNoZW4gRGlyZWN0b3INClBoLkQsIFNlbmlvciBFbmdpbmVlciAoUHJvZmVz c29yIEdyYWRlKQ0KRGVwdC4gb2YgSW5mcmFzdHJ1Y3R1cmUgTmV0d29ya3MNClNoYW5naGFpIFJl c2VhcmNoIEluc3RpdHV0ZSBvZiBDaGluYSBUZWxlY29tIENvcnAuIEx0ZC4NCkFkZDogMTgzNSBT b3V0aCBQdWRvbmcgUm9hZCwgU2hhbmdoYWksIDIwMDEyMiwgQ2hpbmENClRlbCA6ICs4NiAyMSAy ODk3MDE3Ng0KTW9iaWxlOiArODYgMTg5MTg1ODg3ODkNCkUtbWFpbDogc2hlbmNiQHN0dHJpLmNv bS5jbg0KIA0KRnJvbTogc2hlbmNiDQpEYXRlOiAyMDE1LTA0LTEwIDEwOjUwDQpUbzog6JKLeXVh bmxvbmc7IHN0YnJ5YW50OyBkcmFmdC1qaWFuZy1wd2UzLW1jLXBvbkB0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZw0K Q0M6IHBhbHNAaWV0Zi5vcmcNClN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBSRTogW1BhbHNdIElQUiBQb2xsIGRyYWZ0 LWppYW5nLXB3ZTMtbWMtcG9uDQpoae+8jGV2ZXJ5b25lLCBJIHRoaW5rIHRoZSBJUFIgaXMgT0ss IHRvby4NCiAgICAgQmVzdCBSZWdhcmRzIQ0KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICBTaGVuIENoZW5nYmluICAgICAgICAgDQoNCg0KDQrmsojmiJDlvawg5Li75Lu7DQrljZrlo6vv vIzmlZnmjojnuqfpq5jlt6UNCuS4reWbveeUteS/oeiCoeS7veaciemZkOWFrOWPuOS4iua1t+eg lOeptumZoiDln7rnoYDnvZHnu5zpg6ggDQrlnLAgICAgICAg5Z2A77ya5LiK5rW35biC5rWm5Lic 5paw5Yy65rWm5Lic5Y2X6LevMTgzNeWPtw0K6YKuICAgICAgIOe8lu+8mjIwMDEyMg0K55S1ICAg ICAgIOivne+8mjAyMS0yODk3MDE3Ng0K5omLICAgICAgIOacuu+8mjE4OTE4NTg4Nzg5DQrnlLXl rZDpgq7nrrHvvJpzaGVuY2JAc3R0cmkuY29tLmNuDQoNCkNoYW1waW9uKENoZW5nYmluKSBTaGVu IERpcmVjdG9yDQpQaC5ELCBTZW5pb3IgRW5naW5lZXIgKFByb2Zlc3NvciBHcmFkZSkNCkRlcHQu IG9mIEluZnJhc3RydWN0dXJlIE5ldHdvcmtzDQpTaGFuZ2hhaSBSZXNlYXJjaCBJbnN0aXR1dGUg b2YgQ2hpbmEgVGVsZWNvbSBDb3JwLiBMdGQuDQpBZGQ6IDE4MzUgU291dGggUHVkb25nIFJvYWQs IFNoYW5naGFpLCAyMDAxMjIsIENoaW5hDQpUZWwgOiArODYgMjEgMjg5NzAxNzYNCk1vYmlsZTog Kzg2IDE4OTE4NTg4Nzg5DQpFLW1haWw6IHNoZW5jYkBzdHRyaS5jb20uY24NCiANCkZyb206IEpp YW5neXVhbmxvbmcNCkRhdGU6IDIwMTUtMDQtMDEgMDk6MjENClRvOiBzdGJyeWFudEBjaXNjby5j b207IGRyYWZ0LWppYW5nLXB3ZTMtbWMtcG9uQHRvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnDQpDQzogcGFsc0BpZXRm Lm9yZw0KU3ViamVjdDogUkU6IFtQYWxzXSBJUFIgUG9sbCBkcmFmdC1qaWFuZy1wd2UzLW1jLXBv bg0KSGkgYWxsLA0KIA0KSSBhbSBub3QgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IHVuZGlzY2xvc2VkIElQUiByZWxl dmFudCB0byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0LiANCiANClJlZ2FyZHMsDQpZdWFubG9uZw0KIA0KLS0tLS1Pcmln aW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206IFBhbHMgW21haWx0bzpwYWxzLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5v cmddIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiBTdGV3YXJ0IEJyeWFudA0KU2VudDogTW9uZGF5LCBNYXJjaCAzMCwg MjAxNSAxMDoxOCBQTQ0KVG86IGRyYWZ0LWppYW5nLXB3ZTMtbWMtcG9uQHRvb2xzLmlldGYub3Jn DQpDYzogcGFsc0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KU3ViamVjdDogW1BhbHNdIElQUiBQb2xsIGRyYWZ0LWppYW5n LXB3ZTMtbWMtcG9uDQogDQpUaGlzIGlzIHRvIHN0YXJ0IGFuIElQUiBQb2xsIGZvciAgZHJhZnQt amlhbmctcHdlMy1tYy1wb24NCiANClBsZWFzZSBjYW4gZWFjaCBvZiB0aGUgYXV0aG9ycyByZXBs eSB0byBtZSBhbmQgdGhlIFBBTFMgbGlzdA0Kc3RhdGluZyB0aGF0IHRoZXkga25vdyBvZiBubyBJ UFIgdGhhdCBoYXMgbm90IGFscmVhZHkgYmVlbg0KZGlzY2xvc2VkIHRoYXQgaXMgcmVsZXZhbnQg dG8gdGhpcyBkcmFmdC4NCiANClNpbWlsYXJseSBwbGVhc2UgY2FuIGFueSBtZW1iZXIgb2YgdGhl IFBBTFMgV0cgdGhhdA0Ka25vd3Mgb2YgYW55IHJlbGV2YW50IElQUiBhbHNvIGRpc2Nsb3NlIGl0 IG9yIHN0YXRlIHRoYXQNCnRoZXkgaGF2ZSBzdGFydGVkIHRoZSBkaXNjbG9zdXJlIHByb2Nlc3Mu DQogDQpJIHdpbGwgY2xvc2UgdGhpcyBwb2xsIG9uIHRoZSBsYXRlciBvZjogMTN0aCBBcHJpbCAy MDE1IGFuZCB3aGVuDQpJIGhhdmUgaGVhcmQgZnJvbSBhbGwgYXV0aG9ycy4NCiANClRoYW5rcw0K IA0KU3Rld2FydA0KIA0K ------=_001_NextPart221033524715_=---- Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A
= hi, everyone, in addition, I did not hear and know relevant I= PR now.
=0A
     Best Regards!
  &n= bsp;                    =                     &nb= sp;        Shen Chengbin 
=0A=E6=B2=88=E6=88=90=E5=BD=AC = =E4=B8=BB=E4=BB=BB
=E5=8D=9A=E5=A3=AB=EF=BC=8C=E6=95=99= =E6=8E=88=E7=BA=A7=E9=AB=98=E5=B7=A5
=E4=B8=AD=E5=9B=BD= =E7=94=B5=E4=BF=A1=E8=82=A1=E4=BB=BD=E6=9C=89=E9=99=90=E5=85=AC=E5=8F=B8= =E4=B8=8A=E6=B5=B7=E7=A0=94=E7=A9=B6=E9=99=A2 =E5=9F=BA=E7=A1=80=E7=BD=91= =E7=BB=9C=E9=83=A8 
=E5=9C=B0       =E5=9D= =80=EF=BC=9A=E4=B8=8A=E6=B5=B7=E5=B8=82=E6=B5=A6=E4=B8=9C=E6=96=B0=E5=8C= =BA=E6=B5=A6=E4=B8=9C=E5=8D=97=E8=B7=AF1835=E5=8F=B7
=E9=82=AE &= nbsp;     =E7=BC=96=EF=BC=9A200122
=E7=94=B5   &n= bsp;   =E8=AF=9D=EF=BC=9A021-28970176
=E6=89=8B   &nbs= p;   =E6=9C=BA=EF=BC=9A18918588789
=E7=94=B5=E5=AD=90=E9=82= =AE=E7=AE=B1=EF=BC=9Ashencb@sttri.com.cn

Champion= (Chengbin) Shen Director
Ph.D, Senior Engineer (Professor Grade)<= /span>
Dept. of Infrastructure = Networks
Shanghai Resear= ch Institute of China Telecom Corp. Ltd.
Add: 1835 South Pudong Road, Shanghai, 200122, China
Tel : +86= 21 28970176
Mobile: +86 18918588789
E-mail: shencb@sttri.com.cn
=
=0A
 
Date:<= /b> 2015-04-10 10:50
Sub= ject: Re: RE: [Pals] IPR Poll draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon
=
=0A
= hi=EF=BC=8Ceveryone, I think the IPR is OK, too.
    &= nbsp;Best Regards!
            &nb= sp;                   Shen Ch= engbin         
=0A

=0A
=E6=B2=88=E6=88=90=E5=BD=AC=E5=8D=9A=E5=A3=AB=EF=BC=8C= =E6=95=99=E6=8E=88=E7=BA=A7=E9=AB=98=E5=B7=A5
=E4=B8=AD= =E5=9B=BD=E7=94=B5=E4=BF=A1=E8=82=A1=E4=BB=BD=E6=9C=89=E9=99=90=E5=85=AC= =E5=8F=B8=E4=B8=8A=E6=B5=B7=E7=A0=94=E7=A9=B6=E9=99=A2 =E5=9F=BA=E7=A1=80= =E7=BD=91=E7=BB=9C=E9=83=A8 
=E5=9C=B0      = =E5=9D=80=EF=BC=9A=E4=B8=8A=E6=B5=B7=E5=B8=82=E6=B5=A6=E4=B8=9C=E6=96=B0= =E5=8C=BA=E6=B5=A6=E4=B8=9C=E5=8D=97=E8=B7=AF1835=E5=8F=B7
=E9= =82=AE       =E7=BC=96=EF=BC=9A200122
=E7=94=B5 &= nbsp;     =E8=AF=9D=EF=BC=9A021-28970176
=E6=89=8B &nb= sp;     =E6=9C=BA=EF=BC=9A18918588789
=E7=94=B5=E5=AD= =90=E9=82=AE=E7=AE=B1=EF=BC=9Ashencb@sttri.com.cn

Champion(Chengbin) Shen Director<= /div>
Ph.D, Senior Engineer (Professo= r Grade)
Dept. of Infras= tructure Networks
Shangh= ai Research Institute of China Telecom Corp. Ltd.
Add: 1835 South Pudong Road, Shanghai, 200122, C= hina
= Tel : +86 21 28970176
Mobile: +86 18918588789
E-mail: shencb@sttri.com.cn
=0A
 
Hi all,
=0A
&n= bsp;
=0A
I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR relevant to this d= raft.
=0A
 
=0A
Regards,
=0A
Yuanlong=0A
 
=0A
-----Original Message-----
=0A
From= : Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant
=0A=
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:18 PM
=0A
To: draft-jiang-pw= e3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org
=0A
Cc: pals@ietf.org
=0A
Subje= ct: [Pals] IPR Poll draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon
=0A
 
=0AThis is to start an IPR Poll for  draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon
=0A=
 
=0A
Please can each of the authors reply to me and th= e PALS list
=0A
stating that they know of no IPR that has not alr= eady been
=0A
disclosed that is relevant to this draft.
=0A<= div> 
=0A
Similarly please can any member of the PALS WG tha= t
=0A
knows of any relevant IPR also disclose it or state that=0A
they have started the disclosure process.
=0A
 =0A
I will close this poll on the later of: 13th April 2015 and wh= en
=0A
I have heard from all authors.
=0A
 
= =0A
Thanks
=0A
 
=0A
Stewart
=0A
 = ;
=0A
=0A
=0A ------=_001_NextPart221033524715_=------ From nobody Tue Apr 14 05:44:13 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123D31A8FD4 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 05:44:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PNi1KTm4F--l for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 05:44:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A59251A8FD5 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 05:44:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by widjs5 with SMTP id js5so87482244wid.1 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 05:44:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=i7Ozp6DJUiVt1FC717sr4ogd2BIQPOBsWrRzFupD3/4=; b=zLtg/zDSbYV3RKCloj7VOpUkmGLIgTyh1UMGId7IeGLlB2ZFvwkql3Z3XS15kcz8Im OI7LRWAdZrNd/LnfxxM7LlD1RpTdqLxnIe7BRma+m8btZ9khMSn1ZX7wrxEBzEQEDtRz 3JOH0eM4BCK8VkXXX1N3qa1yZqRXaLGo7LLqcECG3U91SVQGi/P359mMvANAnlSj5W/+ 4WM1CO5QZRbFx3LQsnBgx8u4OPjhZ+Tw+T8VGIzvvCzLTnL1pAfagS+phL5btrBosTQh hWnKIvek6UmNtHfV1ozIoJ1RdU6ImOlWAXYan9TDS2mNLFtHQT29tm1k1dd5rrkMzlm/ XMHQ== X-Received: by 10.180.101.98 with SMTP id ff2mr31959183wib.15.1429015447251; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 05:44:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.182.215 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 05:43:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Andrew G. Malis" Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:43:47 -0400 Message-ID: To: "pals@ietf.org" , draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@tools.ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d041826221cb9900513ae9683 Archived-At: Subject: [Pals] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:44:12 -0000 --f46d041826221cb9900513ae9683 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 This mail starts an IPR poll on http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 in preparation for WG last call. Authors and contributors, are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the PALS WG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each contributor. If you are on the PALS WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We will close this poll on 4th April 2015 or later if we have not heard from all authors/contributors by then. Thanks, Andy and Stewart --f46d041826221cb9900513ae9683 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This mail starts an IPR poll on=C2=A0http://tools.ietf.= org/html/draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 in preparation for WG last c= all.

Authors and contributors, are you aware of an= y IPR that applies to=C2=A0draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR = rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If you are listed as a document author or contributor = please respond to
this email stating of whether or not you are aw= are of any relevant
IPR. The response needs to be sent to the PAL= S WG mailing list. The
document will not advance to the next stag= e until a response
has been received from each author and each co= ntributor.

If you are on the PALS WG email list bu= t are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explici= tly respond only if you are aware of any
IPR that has not yet bee= n disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

We wil= l close this poll on 4th =C2=A0April 2015 or later if we have not heard fro= m
all authors/contributors by then.

Than= ks,
Andy and Stewart

--f46d041826221cb9900513ae9683-- From nobody Tue Apr 14 07:30:17 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5FF21AC3BF for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:30:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3VUYjV9srvjL for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:30:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com (mail-pa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6670E1AC3BA for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:30:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pacyx8 with SMTP id yx8so13716298pac.1 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:30:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=yP1rEcb/vWHCdCBU2ZnhQO27mnJJ21X/U4GlNAmXLYU=; b=Y0RkLSwtc/f+z3xX7kFpW1m79jwNnPiNQFzgtjvkMpApnKiDeeP2xReM7VLT8pQo2S ZoaOuWw+xdjPot9jDVocX90gwjSoYwxb0rsGzO56L6NPx463imsVx9l0rRP4LXsBA/hv 8QAIIHu/xmtPFf9Yo339tq4lYAt0WG5nfMZh+qAaDhK8ZCfBhK+Gra6EskqAWDh1C+l+ zNYLHQvYYELi11P9e5LhFwCAZhyWx6D8hU2ZPE06bV5a3vzXokcfBn/71+Cpy6nQ5nJP CtXUrjsAOzqcOL25VNrO7yAfxZaLAImx1YRyyOjzLX0AqD7RqWACZBNUuUG8BeUXQoUu 8UcQ== X-Received: by 10.70.54.103 with SMTP id i7mr12726841pdp.134.1429021809078; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:30:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.212.235.65] ([166.170.39.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id zt9sm1323397pac.9.2015.04.14.07.30.07 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:30:08 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-E9F12E53-BDEE-45E0-97C5-FB394DFEDE55 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) From: Sam Aldrin X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12F70) In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:30:06 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: To: "Andrew G. Malis" Archived-At: Cc: "draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@tools.ietf.org" , "pals@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:30:15 -0000 --Apple-Mail-E9F12E53-BDEE-45E0-97C5-FB394DFEDE55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Sam Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 14, 2015, at 5:43 AM, Andrew G. Malis wrote: >=20 > This mail starts an IPR poll on http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pals= -mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 in preparation for WG last call. >=20 > Authors and contributors, are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-i= etf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00? >=20 > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? >=20 > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to > this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant > IPR. The response needs to be sent to the PALS WG mailing list. The > document will not advance to the next stage until a response > has been received from each author and each contributor. >=20 > If you are on the PALS WG email list but are not listed as an author or > contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any > IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >=20 > We will close this poll on 4th April 2015 or later if we have not heard f= rom > all authors/contributors by then. >=20 > Thanks, > Andy and Stewart >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Pals mailing list > Pals@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals --Apple-Mail-E9F12E53-BDEE-45E0-97C5-FB394DFEDE55 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Not aware of any IPR related to this d= raft.

Sam

Sent from my iPhone

= On Apr 14, 2015, at 5:43 AM, Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com> wrote:

This mail starts an IPR poll on http://to= ols.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 in preparation for W= G last call.

Authors and contributors, are you awar= e of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF= IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?<= /div>

If you are listed as a document author or contribut= or please respond to
this email stating of whether or not you are a= ware of any relevant
IPR. The response needs to be sent to the PAL= S WG mailing list. The
document will not advance to the next stage= until a response
has been received from each author and each cont= ributor.

If you are on the PALS WG email list but a= re not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly r= espond only if you are aware of any
IPR that has not yet been disc= losed in conformance with IETF rules.

We will close= this poll on 4th  April 2015 or later if we have not heard from
<= div>all authors/contributors by then.

Thanks,
=
Andy and Stewart

____________________= ___________________________
Pals mailing list
Pals@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman= /listinfo/pals
= --Apple-Mail-E9F12E53-BDEE-45E0-97C5-FB394DFEDE55-- From nobody Tue Apr 14 08:09:01 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81FE1A01A8 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:26:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.226 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.226 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tcbbuGBkbo7P for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:26:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pacdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (PACDCMHOUT01.cable.comcast.com [68.87.31.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DC311AC3B0 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:26:53 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 44571fa7-f79176d00000427f-df-552d23ab90d5 Received: from pacdcexhub05.cable.comcast.com (dlpemail-wc-2p.sys.comcast.net [24.40.12.145]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by pacdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (SMTP Gateway) with SMTP id 63.DF.17023.BA32D255; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:26:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from PACDCEXMB04.cable.comcast.com ([169.254.6.37]) by pacdcexhub05.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3d40:bdea:7266:7f5a%18]) with mapi id 14.03.0181.006; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:26:51 -0400 From: "Venkatesan, Mannan" To: "Andrew G. Malis" , "pals@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 Thread-Index: AQHQdrDOGKNTH73kwE6X8Dq1Wyf64Z1MkLSA Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:27:46 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.1.140326 x-originating-ip: [147.191.124.160] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D1529BC12F1BBmannanvenkatesancablecomcastcom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Forward X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrOIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiocEzUXeNsm6owYQbXBann59is/i44RCL xZp/65gcmD12zrrL7rFkyU8mjy+XP7MFMEdx2aSk5mSWpRbp2yVwZdxYcJa54L5OxcxPlg2M 79W6GDk4JARMJE52SXcxcgKZYhIX7q1n62Lk4hAS2MYk0dC9H8o5yCjxZd1lFpAGNgEHiRtn vUAaRATWM0psvmgEYgsLWEvs3z2PHSJuI7HmxARGCNtI4u3FLWA2i4CqxIzFu1lBxvACjTn2 SxwkLCQQIHHlxVuwMKdAoMSfB3kgYUagc76fWsMEYjMLiEvcejKfCeJMAYkle84zQ9iiEi8f /2MFsUUF9CTeHYepUZbY9fgMI0RvisSOKfPA4rwCghInZz5hgagRlzh8ZAfrBEaxWUhWzELS MgtJC0RcR2LB7k9sELa2xLKFr5lh7DMHHkP1Okh0H3nMgqxmASPHKka5gsTklOTcjPzSEgND veTEpJxUveT83OTE4hIQvYkRGL0u4fLLdzDee+F0iFGAg1GJh3eLsG6oEGtiWXFl7iFGCQ5m JRHeA/xAId6UxMqq1KL8+KLSnNTiQ4zSHCxK4rxXTmuHCgmkJ5akZqemFqQWwWSZODilGhhX cxlV/L1U5GORK1UbVb2o/vJ6senX6y7Kc7OJ6O6c8dnh8IkPyj8PrA7jeivLtSrPY4Htl6k3 u+qWKd29bqO79lXkdlavuACPxCff1py5+2neVI0Yqb1iVgo9Syvf2y5Ylz6fJbukiKW5xz1A bfVvO8mYvw3H9Iv0Uy9X/lkwLXdyyocrG3SVWIozEg21mIuKEwFQuiWO2gIAAA== Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:09:00 -0700 Subject: Re: [Pals] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:26:58 -0000 --_000_D1529BC12F1BBmannanvenkatesancablecomcastcom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andy, I am not aware of any IPR. Thanks, Mannan From: "Andrew G. Malis" > Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 8:43 AM To: "pals@ietf.org" >, "draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@tools.ietf.org" > Subject: IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 Resent-From: > Resent-To: > Resent-Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 8:44 AM This mail starts an IPR poll on http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pals-= mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 in preparation for WG last call. Authors and contributors, are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ie= tf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the PALS WG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each contributor. If you are on the PALS WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We will close this poll on 4th April 2015 or later if we have not heard fr= om all authors/contributors by then. Thanks, Andy and Stewart --_000_D1529BC12F1BBmannanvenkatesancablecomcastcom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <406FAB8589FB80428E88C4C103F310F5@cable.comcast.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Andy,
I am not aware of any IPR.

Thanks,
Mannan

From: "Andrew G. Malis" &= lt;agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 8:= 43 AM
To: "pals@ietf.org" <pals@i= etf.org>, "draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@tools.ietf.org" <draft= -ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pa= ls-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00
Resent-From: <agmalis@gmail.com>
Resent-To: <draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@ietf.= org>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, April 14, 201= 5 at 8:44 AM

This mail starts an IPR poll on http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ie= tf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 in preparation for WG last call.

Authors and contributors, are you aware of any IPR that applies to&nbs= p;draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond t= o
this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
IPR. The response needs to be sent to the PALS WG mailing list. The
document will not advance to the next stage until a response
has been received from each author and each contributor.

If you are on the PALS WG email list but are not listed as an author o= r
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of a= ny
IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

We will close this poll on 4th  April 2015 or later if we have no= t heard from
all authors/contributors by then.

Thanks,
Andy and Stewart

--_000_D1529BC12F1BBmannanvenkatesancablecomcastcom_-- From nobody Tue Apr 14 09:32:56 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4781B2E71 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:32:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.266 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q_f2UOgOAFfo for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:32:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com [67.231.144.234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67E4B1B2E6C for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:32:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0000419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t3EGTfir017767; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:32:49 -0400 Received: from mdwexght02.ciena.com (LIN1-118-36-29.ciena.com [63.118.36.29]) by mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 1trmtu3cpb-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:32:48 -0400 Received: from ONWVEXCHHT04.ciena.com (10.128.6.44) by MDWEXGHT02.ciena.com (10.4.140.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.298.1; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:32:45 -0400 Received: from ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com ([::1]) by ONWVEXCHHT04.ciena.com ([::1]) with mapi; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:32:44 -0400 From: "Shah, Himanshu" To: "Venkatesan, Mannan" , "Andrew G. Malis" , "pals@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@tools.ietf.org" Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:31:26 -0400 Thread-Topic: IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 Thread-Index: AQHQdrDOGKNTH73kwE6X8Dq1Wyf64Z1MkLSAgAAi0ww= Message-ID: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B87C3CCBF@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com> References: , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US, en-CA Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US, en-CA X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-10.0.0.1412-7.000.1014-21476.000 X-TM-AS-Result: No--4.558400-0.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.13.68, 1.0.33, 0.0.0000 definitions=2015-04-14_05:2015-04-14,2015-04-14,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1504140141 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pals] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 16:32:54 -0000 I am not aware of any IPR. Himanshu ________________________________________ From: Venkatesan, Mannan [Mannan_Venkatesan@Cable.Comcast.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 10:27 AM To: Andrew G. Malis; pals@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@tools.ie= tf.org Subject: Re: IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 Andy, I am not aware of any IPR. Thanks, Mannan From: "Andrew G. Malis" > Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 8:43 AM To: "pals@ietf.org" >, "draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@tools.ietf.org" > Subject: IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 Resent-From: > Resent-To: > Resent-Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 8:44 AM This mail starts an IPR poll on http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pals-= mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 in preparation for WG last call. Authors and contributors, are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ie= tf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the PALS WG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each contributor. If you are on the PALS WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We will close this poll on 4th April 2015 or later if we have not heard fr= om all authors/contributors by then. Thanks, Andy and Stewart From nobody Tue Apr 14 09:51:00 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F94C1B2EED for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:50:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t-nQ5PG3QPcz for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:50:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54C251B2EF0 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:50:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=229; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429030253; x=1430239853; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sd2e5wjPrk/ccZrST4u4PrZyOMxTMncF/ATBdp/31rc=; b=f5g7XWEr9+7KBd6+sudgs/xBSJtkgc2LhgeULH1eIxfj9WvPprnvZ0pK ua4P2v/vuVxq3FopzKAZ5/CyVFgfmfQJyon9QB7nSgIwzY6xvhtgz+i7y DRkRJihNIbmUzBuVEHlQD2cyNLcV7/8DTjcX1B8E8U8nLKr+9BNaPtYoL c=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,576,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="426781736" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Apr 2015 16:50:51 +0000 Received: from [10.55.98.187] (ams-stbryant-88110.cisco.com [10.55.98.187]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3EGop8c018937; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 16:50:51 GMT Message-ID: <552D456B.8050205@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 17:50:51 +0100 From: Stewart Bryant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "pals@ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" , draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org, Matthew Bocci , pals-ads , Haibo Wang References: <20150127144432.4057.11091.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20150127144432.4057.11091.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 16:50:58 -0000 This email starts the WG last call on draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe This document can be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe/ Last call will close on 29th April 2015 - Stewart From nobody Tue Apr 14 09:52:49 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567C61B2EFE for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:52:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.51 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DytpiapfK1MY for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:52:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 282621B2F02 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:52:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7861; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429030366; x=1430239966; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=3MCWM9BBtmi/TPrxaZikKeQ5lhBxFzQhyfPC30DmmCk=; b=iwGPqPcz51X0FmeBtQixO4nV12IkRCgdsOO6zBE83Wba4vDVXZX1T+ny 7wjlas8pfMXfhY7a/Y5tUvvle4UnMpm1vHumEp5X627sJLLOJOo17uo1o G+vancY9lX7ek3rOueKmWMfHGxhIeopKG81da3t8II8Opjim5pY1UJQl3 s=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DsBQCRRC1V/51dJa1cgkVHUlwFxTuBdwEJhgECgUVMAQEBAQEBfoQfAQEBBAEBAWsGBRACAQgRAwEBASgHIQYLFAkIAgQOBYgWAxENxmANhSsBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXiyuCSIFREAIBPw0EB4MXgRYFjnSCGoN5hEuBTQGBHDqCfYlehjoig29vgUR/AQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,576,1422921600"; d="scan'208,217";a="412133029" Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Apr 2015 16:52:44 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com [173.37.183.82]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3EGqiNd004300 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 16:52:44 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.8.172]) by xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([173.37.183.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:52:44 -0500 From: "Sami Boutros (sboutros)" To: "Shah, Himanshu" Thread-Topic: [Pals] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 Thread-Index: AQHQdr8VAGP6S17LRE68G6E9zDFqFZ1NBzoAgAAGMgA= Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 16:52:43 +0000 Message-ID: References: , <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B87C3CCBF@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com> In-Reply-To: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B87C3CCBF@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.156.48.112] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_EF5D014FE67143EDB450A37AEEA94D0Fciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "Venkatesan, Mannan" , "Andrew G. Malis" , "draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@tools.ietf.org" , "pals@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 16:52:48 -0000 --_000_EF5D014FE67143EDB450A37AEEA94D0Fciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable same here. Thanks, Sami On Apr 14, 2015, at 9:31 AM, Shah, Himanshu > wrote: I am not aware of any IPR. Himanshu ________________________________________ From: Venkatesan, Mannan [Mannan_Venkatesan@Cable.Comcast.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 10:27 AM To: Andrew G. Malis; pals@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pals-m= pls-tp-mac-wd@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 Andy, I am not aware of any IPR. Thanks, Mannan From: "Andrew G. Malis" > Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 8:43 AM To: "pals@ietf.org" >, "draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-= mac-wd@tools.ietf.org= " > Subject: IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 Resent-From: > Resent-To: > Resent-Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 8:44 AM This mail starts an IPR poll on http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pals-= mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 in preparation for WG last call. Authors and contributors, are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ie= tf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the PALS WG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each contributor. If you are on the PALS WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We will close this poll on 4th April 2015 or later if we have not heard fr= om all authors/contributors by then. Thanks, Andy and Stewart _______________________________________________ Pals mailing list Pals@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals --_000_EF5D014FE67143EDB450A37AEEA94D0Fciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <247514CAD3B93C479D96F925C5D1041D@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable same here.

Thanks,

Sami
On Apr 14, 2015, at 9:31 AM, Shah, Himanshu <hshah@ciena.com> wrote:

I am not aware of any IPR.
Himanshu
________________________________________
From: Venkatesan, Mannan [Mannan_Venkatesan@Cable.Comcast.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 10:27 AM
To: Andrew G. Malis; pals@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00

Andy,
I am not aware of any IPR.

Thanks,
Mannan

From: "Andrew G. Malis" <= agmalis@gmail.com<mailto:agmali= s@gmail.com>>
Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 8:43 AM
To: "pals@ietf.org<mailto:pals@ietf.org>" <pals@ietf.org<ma= ilto:pals@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@tools.ietf.org<mail= to:draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@tools.ietf.org>" <draft= -ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd= @tools.ietf.org>>
Subject: IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00
Resent-From: <agmalis@gmail.com= <mailto:agmalis@gmail.com>&g= t;
Resent-To: <d= raft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@ietf.or= g>>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 8:44 AM

This mail starts an IPR poll on http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 in prepara= tion for WG last call.

Authors and contributors, are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ie= tf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
IPR. The response needs to be sent to the PALS WG mailing list. The
document will not advance to the next stage until a response
has been received from each author and each contributor.

If you are on the PALS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

We will close this poll on 4th  April 2015 or later if we have not hea= rd from
all authors/contributors by then.

Thanks,
Andy and Stewart

_______________________________________________
Pals mailing list
Pals@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org= /mailman/listinfo/pals

--_000_EF5D014FE67143EDB450A37AEEA94D0Fciscocom_-- From nobody Tue Apr 14 09:56:56 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077111B2EB0 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:56:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FsuwCUEYWxtg for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:56:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 978921B2E51 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:56:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=223; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429030611; x=1430240211; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=O5BCLJuHsaQeiorqsgyX9K19OqbRahgf1EIrZfKbfu0=; b=A/Nvebmj6ig+JBEx7WQtbYV8YsWXRTnUMutsEmzmloWS5Owwc/EC7/8+ bK5iSnUTUiW5ktl1ry3YEW+BqSNiUll9RvL9xGcCmOXMHpeanV8y1Rt6P r4pf8F6od/sp0QLETsJbYbV/IB+y0CLKy0Y7e4D577hMQNVwEhwmnaYui 0=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,576,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="449529268" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Apr 2015 16:56:50 +0000 Received: from [10.55.98.187] (ams-stbryant-88110.cisco.com [10.55.98.187]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3EGunFR024501; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 16:56:49 GMT Message-ID: <552D46D1.70304@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 17:56:49 +0100 From: Stewart Bryant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jiangyuanlong , Loa Andersson , Gregory Mirsky , "draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection@tools.ietf.org" , "pals@ietf.org" References: <54EB2CEC.8040302@cisco.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B9158E7@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <54F03382.4080108@pi.nu> <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A892E86@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A892E86@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pals] Poll to determine consensus for adoption of draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection as WG draft X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 16:56:54 -0000 Authors There is WG consensus to adopt this draft, but it should be an Informational RFC. Please change the track to Informational and resubmit as draft-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection Thanks - Stewart From nobody Tue Apr 14 10:00:46 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085D71B2EBC for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:00:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QyIJOOZHBqkO for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:00:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61B671B2EBF for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:00:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=147; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429030818; x=1430240418; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WeIufsvhOcm4tkXNSLEGdI/l2drZPqvHywetonsxkTM=; b=f2Jjatfmu1lwh055TuqoP5QfMWPatorWQvvvvyU0tP8jP/iHMh/u3cJ5 GxscP/PKeKFOaMURdo8DnMKHegv0/9rox2jaSDQiDSIsC4ogo3LLE69V/ PvjtqOQlc6pHKmfzgMv46feSZJrUetjJuYmt8RsJW5DCO/JCyDd/Zo0X+ 8=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,576,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="431410941" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Apr 2015 17:00:17 +0000 Received: from [10.55.98.187] (ams-stbryant-88110.cisco.com [10.55.98.187]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3EH0Gju011271; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 17:00:16 GMT Message-ID: <552D47A0.8010305@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 18:00:16 +0100 From: Stewart Bryant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jiangyuanlong , Gregory Mirsky , "draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination@tools.ietf.org" , "pals@ietf.org" References: <548986EC.6050806@cisco.com> <54EB2CF2.1010903@cisco.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B915900@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A892E97@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A892E97@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pals] Poll to determine consensus for adoption of draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination as WG draft X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 17:00:40 -0000 Authors There is WG consensus to adopt this draft. Please resubmit as draft-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination Thanks - Stewart From nobody Tue Apr 14 10:12:01 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200A21A014D for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:12:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nc8jNQzkwuKk for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:11:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21E7C1A0130 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:11:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=190; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429031516; x=1430241116; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject: content-transfer-encoding; bh=4BLy6ghifutOFOP5ix8YYLji80iwx6EHE3iQhOQKAc0=; b=dTrl/vhwaE0FhRSN1qUCYYZ0N7pXme0O9IknVxL6l2sOX1yBNXY6GlOK 6Jk2PUxPRsl3cL+Gu0qMjaU2xGApyiy3g9YnqM+FaVNT5nFsU5cWIRCl4 txKQafvVAQBo7a7KWz9ZuVdDONtF/zG7nxwvBPVVxkU81yM3ld+ssivA5 4=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,576,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="427210455" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Apr 2015 17:11:54 +0000 Received: from [10.55.98.187] (ams-stbryant-88110.cisco.com [10.55.98.187]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3EHBsJR005665; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 17:11:54 GMT Message-ID: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 18:11:54 +0100 From: Stewart Bryant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "pals@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" Subject: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 17:12:00 -0000 This is to start a two week WG poll to determine whether we should adopt https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon-03 This poll will close on 29th April 2015 - Stewart From nobody Tue Apr 14 10:24:25 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250411A01FC for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:24:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VIci5t0h6__e for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:24:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAE111A0252 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:23:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (81-236-221-144-no93.tbcn.telia.com [81.236.221.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7122D180145E; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 19:23:03 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <552D4CF7.2050808@pi.nu> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 19:23:03 +0200 From: Loa Andersson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stbryant@cisco.com, Jiangyuanlong , Gregory Mirsky , "draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination@tools.ietf.org" , "pals@ietf.org" References: <548986EC.6050806@cisco.com> <54EB2CF2.1010903@cisco.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B915900@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A892E97@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> <552D47A0.8010305@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <552D47A0.8010305@cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pals] Poll to determine consensus for adoption of draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination as WG draft X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 17:24:23 -0000 Stewart, Shouldn't the draft file name be: draft-pals-ietf-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination ? /Loa On 2015-04-14 19:00, Stewart Bryant wrote: > Authors > > There is WG consensus to adopt this draft. > > Please resubmit as > > draft-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination > > Thanks > > - Stewart > > _______________________________________________ > Pals mailing list > Pals@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals -- Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 From nobody Tue Apr 14 11:40:18 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0931D1AC3D3 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:40:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KX-U7TesYltw for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:40:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2AF01AC3D2 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wgso17 with SMTP id o17so22112890wgs.1 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:40:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=1gkN2qMdAqiUo5gHlyyqXN4TuqJJMc2cS2osdoUx1J0=; b=iVO34hQSVKNUJP8AyVgRHUWskZ5LqFsglcEN3lSIpgbo8qdBUAnmI9/CVx/r9SpF66 81kMsoKMqiThVys8WwBi91Jpuv0owv+CL59K2XbYHm1AbzmA84Y4TwqfyaUSe+iFoJFw 1pQeZTxbRyFwz6TOlQI7BPhvJlP6CFTKaaIFuFfjIzcvDN8L99GPN2YptO5J4Mehe3JS 6LjDZFmdb7b/Lq/CSbu6C5N7QfZkFcHGhoQpA3Vm4+8HGRL070GA0UrYyIt4lml49GzY EQDquWN9VoJw1haJqcQUsbCVJTpbk7gskyp0tqtlO1G1FJi1Dt56ZESVUHef6sjUaBcm hhQg== X-Received: by 10.194.81.233 with SMTP id d9mr42811471wjy.42.1429036813639; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:40:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.182.215 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:39:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <552D4CF7.2050808@pi.nu> References: <548986EC.6050806@cisco.com> <54EB2CF2.1010903@cisco.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B915900@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A892E97@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> <552D47A0.8010305@cisco.com> <552D4CF7.2050808@pi.nu> From: "Andrew G. Malis" Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:39:53 -0400 Message-ID: To: Loa Andersson Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb04b82a5e5d10513b38f55 Archived-At: Cc: Gregory Mirsky , Jiangyuanlong , "pals@ietf.org" , "draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination@tools.ietf.org" , Stewart Bryant Subject: Re: [Pals] Poll to determine consensus for adoption of draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination as WG draft X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 18:40:17 -0000 --047d7bb04b82a5e5d10513b38f55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Loa and Stewart, Actually, you're both a bit wrong :-), it should be draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination. Cheers, Andy On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Loa Andersson wrote: > Stewart, > > Shouldn't the draft file name be: > > draft-pals-ietf-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination ? > > /Loa > > > > On 2015-04-14 19:00, Stewart Bryant wrote: > >> Authors >> >> There is WG consensus to adopt this draft. >> >> Please resubmit as >> >> draft-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination >> >> Thanks >> >> - Stewart >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pals mailing list >> Pals@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals >> > > -- > > > Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com > Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu > Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 > > > _______________________________________________ > Pals mailing list > Pals@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals > --047d7bb04b82a5e5d10513b38f55 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Loa and Stewart,

Actually, you're b= oth a bit wrong :-), it should be=C2=A0draft= -ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordinati= on.

<= span style=3D"font-size:13px">Cheers,
Andy

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu&g= t; wrote:
Stewart,

Shouldn't the draft file name be:

draft-pals-ietf-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination=C2=A0 ?

/Loa



On 2015-04-14 19:00, Stewart Bryant wrote:
Authors

There is WG consensus to adopt this draft.

Please resubmit as

draft-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination

Thanks

- Stewart

_______________________________________________
Pals mailing list
Pals@ietf.org
ht= tps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals

--


Loa Andersson=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
Senior MPLS Expert=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 loa@pi.nu
Huawei Technologies (consultant)=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0phone: +46 739= 81 21 64


_______________________________________________
Pals mailing list
Pals@ietf.org
ht= tps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals

--047d7bb04b82a5e5d10513b38f55-- From nobody Tue Apr 14 11:41:00 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723DD1AC3E4 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:40:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xopnQOWGOY2D for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:40:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x232.google.com (mail-wg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E56301AC3F2 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:40:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wgsk9 with SMTP id k9so21902978wgs.3 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:40:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=eqtEg3mvOm6KHa/K6zg//AR840tukGG7qN0+IaBixO4=; b=iiXOvZLPN0jwcoVlWBHY1dmH5Gtz8q/q4qaP4ngH7byVlI+ujt24iqM7VXNaLx94BJ OMaFVHd/Zta6p7drpAzJiElxihNsCxovl+Ta6vXqdgqB6ATbaTErhdtrVwf+PkZMsNaL YIRzkyniqcxeSYECf0SuB2gFaCER2s8MieOc2tciy/+VTcI+PUbgIZzUPZdmd7orAb1o RZqA+61lBZAZbsezOWaTpz/6vgi3JYMmwy7ARrY43+2gC5CCNVtcUvODVlvEExxxVKvc T0OtK6lmwYHygfZiUcLlccJLc8F00inBKwUuO2t6IcBq18oXRE6YaepICYUo1GFC2EvX DwFg== X-Received: by 10.194.185.9 with SMTP id ey9mr42736143wjc.135.1429036848765; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:40:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.182.215 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:40:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <552D46D1.70304@cisco.com> References: <54EB2CEC.8040302@cisco.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B9158E7@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <54F03382.4080108@pi.nu> <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A892E86@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> <552D46D1.70304@cisco.com> From: "Andrew G. Malis" Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:40:28 -0400 Message-ID: To: Stewart Bryant Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd6adcebde1b70513b391a6 Archived-At: Cc: Gregory Mirsky , "draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection@tools.ietf.org" , Jiangyuanlong , "pals@ietf.org" , Loa Andersson Subject: Re: [Pals] Poll to determine consensus for adoption of draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection as WG draft X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 18:40:59 -0000 --047d7bd6adcebde1b70513b391a6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 This should be draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection. Cheers, Andy On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Stewart Bryant wrote: > Authors > > There is WG consensus to adopt this draft, but it should be > an Informational RFC. > > Please change the track to Informational and resubmit as > > draft-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection > > Thanks > > > - Stewart > > _______________________________________________ > Pals mailing list > Pals@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals > --047d7bd6adcebde1b70513b391a6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This should be=C2=A0draft-i= etf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection.

<= /span>
Cheers,
Andy


On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Stewart Bryant <stbryant@c= isco.com> wrote:
Authors<= br>
There is WG consensus to adopt this draft, but it should be
an Informational RFC.

Please change the track to Informational and resubmit as

draft-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection

Thanks


- Stewart

_______________________________________________
Pals mailing list
Pals@ietf.org
ht= tps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals

--047d7bd6adcebde1b70513b391a6-- From nobody Tue Apr 14 17:52:36 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1661B29E9 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 17:52:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rgR3n0wZjEGP for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 17:52:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 497671B29E0 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 17:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BUV79581; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 00:52:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.70) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 01:52:15 +0100 Received: from SZXEMA506-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.68]) by szxema411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 08:52:06 +0800 From: Jiangyuanlong To: "stbryant@cisco.com" , "pals@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? Thread-Index: AQHQdtYkt4wlGQP5H0GFH3zHx07BF51NPtyg Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 00:52:05 +0000 Message-ID: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A8C8EC0@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> References: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.66.76.118] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Cc: "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 00:52:33 -0000 U3VwcG9ydCBhcyBhIGNvYXV0aG9yLg0KDQpUaGFua3MsDQpZdWFubG9uZw0KDQoNCi0tLS0tT3Jp Z2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQpGcm9tOiBTdGV3YXJ0IEJyeWFudCBbbWFpbHRvOnN0YnJ5YW50 QGNpc2NvLmNvbV0gDQpTZW50OiBXZWRuZXNkYXksIEFwcmlsIDE1LCAyMDE1IDE6MTIgQU0NClRv OiBwYWxzQGlldGYub3JnDQpDYzogZHJhZnQtamlhbmctcHdlMy1tYy1wb25AdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5v cmc7IHBhbHMtY2hhaXJzQHRvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBTaG91bGQgdGhlIFBBTFMg V0cgYWRvcHQgZHJhZnQtamlhbmctcHdlMy1tYy1wb24/DQoNClRoaXMgaXMgdG8gc3RhcnQgYSB0 d28gd2VlayBXRyBwb2xsIHRvIGRldGVybWluZSB3aGV0aGVyDQp3ZSBzaG91bGQgYWRvcHQNCg0K aHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWppYW5nLXB3ZTMtbWMtcG9uLTAzDQoN ClRoaXMgcG9sbCB3aWxsIGNsb3NlIG9uICAyOXRoIEFwcmlsIDIwMTUNCg0KLSBTdGV3YXJ0DQo= From nobody Tue Apr 14 18:59:23 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884CB1B30A5 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 18:59:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8MIgqXNGuYFk for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 18:59:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3C161B30A1 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 18:59:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BRK05911; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 01:59:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML410-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.41) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 02:59:16 +0100 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.135]) by nkgeml410-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 09:59:07 +0800 From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" To: "Andrew G. Malis" , Loa Andersson Thread-Topic: [Pals] Poll to determine consensus for adoption of draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination as WG draft Thread-Index: AQHQT23fKhcDkfcLGEun7pAoBSVlQ51NCj3O//+AHoCAABV3gIABACwA Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 01:59:05 +0000 Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D06558@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <548986EC.6050806@cisco.com> <54EB2CF2.1010903@cisco.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B915900@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A892E97@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> <552D47A0.8010305@cisco.com> <552D4CF7.2050808@pi.nu> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.97.131] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D06558nkgeml512mbxchi_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Cc: Gregory Mirsky , Jiangyuanlong , "pals@ietf.org" , "draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination@tools.ietf.org" , Stewart Bryant Subject: Re: [Pals] Poll to determine consensus for adoption of draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination as WG draft X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 01:59:21 -0000 --_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D06558nkgeml512mbxchi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 RGVhciBTdGV3YXJ0LCBBbmR5LCBMb2EsDQoNClRoYW5rcyBmb3IgdGhpcyBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiwg d2Ugd2lsbCByZXN1Ym1pdCB0aGUgZHJhZnRzIHdpdGggcHJvcGVyIHRyYWNrIGFuZCBuYW1lcyBz b29uLg0KDQpCZXN0IHJlZ2FyZHMsDQpKaWUNCg0KRnJvbTogQW5kcmV3IEcuIE1hbGlzIFttYWls dG86YWdtYWxpc0BnbWFpbC5jb21dDQpTZW50OiBXZWRuZXNkYXksIEFwcmlsIDE1LCAyMDE1IDI6 NDAgQU0NClRvOiBMb2EgQW5kZXJzc29uDQpDYzogU3Rld2FydCBCcnlhbnQ7IEppYW5neXVhbmxv bmc7IEdyZWdvcnkgTWlyc2t5OyBkcmFmdC1jaGVuZy1wd2UzLW1wbHMtdHAtZHVhbC1ob21pbmct Y29vcmRpbmF0aW9uQHRvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnOyBwYWxzQGlldGYub3JnDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTog W1BhbHNdIFBvbGwgdG8gZGV0ZXJtaW5lIGNvbnNlbnN1cyBmb3IgYWRvcHRpb24gb2YgZHJhZnQt Y2hlbmctcHdlMy1tcGxzLXRwLWR1YWwtaG9taW5nLWNvb3JkaW5hdGlvbiBhcyBXRyBkcmFmdA0K DQpMb2EgYW5kIFN0ZXdhcnQsDQoNCkFjdHVhbGx5LCB5b3UncmUgYm90aCBhIGJpdCB3cm9uZyA6 LSksIGl0IHNob3VsZCBiZSBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLXBhbHMtbXBscy10cC1kdWFsLWhvbWluZy1jb29y ZGluYXRpb24uDQoNCkNoZWVycywNCkFuZHkNCg0KT24gVHVlLCBBcHIgMTQsIDIwMTUgYXQgMToy MyBQTSwgTG9hIEFuZGVyc3NvbiA8bG9hQHBpLm51PG1haWx0bzpsb2FAcGkubnU+PiB3cm90ZToN ClN0ZXdhcnQsDQoNClNob3VsZG4ndCB0aGUgZHJhZnQgZmlsZSBuYW1lIGJlOg0KDQpkcmFmdC1w YWxzLWlldGYtbXBscy10cC1kdWFsLWhvbWluZy1jb29yZGluYXRpb24gID8NCg0KL0xvYQ0KDQoN Cg0KT24gMjAxNS0wNC0xNCAxOTowMCwgU3Rld2FydCBCcnlhbnQgd3JvdGU6DQpBdXRob3JzDQoN ClRoZXJlIGlzIFdHIGNvbnNlbnN1cyB0byBhZG9wdCB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0Lg0KDQpQbGVhc2UgcmVz dWJtaXQgYXMNCg0KZHJhZnQtcGFscy1tcGxzLXRwLWR1YWwtaG9taW5nLWNvb3JkaW5hdGlvbg0K DQpUaGFua3MNCg0KLSBTdGV3YXJ0DQoNCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQpQYWxzIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KUGFsc0BpZXRmLm9yZzxtYWlsdG86 UGFsc0BpZXRmLm9yZz4NCmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vcGFs cw0KDQotLQ0KDQoNCkxvYSBBbmRlcnNzb24gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBlbWFpbDog bG9hQG1haWwwMS5odWF3ZWkuY29tPG1haWx0bzpsb2FAbWFpbDAxLmh1YXdlaS5jb20+DQpTZW5p b3IgTVBMUyBFeHBlcnQgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGxvYUBwaS5udTxtYWlsdG86 bG9hQHBpLm51Pg0KSHVhd2VpIFRlY2hub2xvZ2llcyAoY29uc3VsdGFudCkgICAgIHBob25lOiAr NDYgNzM5IDgxIDIxIDY0PHRlbDolMkI0NiUyMDczOSUyMDgxJTIwMjElMjA2ND4NCg0KDQpfX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KUGFscyBtYWlsaW5n IGxpc3QNClBhbHNAaWV0Zi5vcmc8bWFpbHRvOlBhbHNAaWV0Zi5vcmc+DQpodHRwczovL3d3dy5p ZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3BhbHMNCg0K --_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D06558nkgeml512mbxchi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWwgeG1sbnM6dj0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTp2bWwiIHhtbG5zOm89InVy bjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206b2ZmaWNlOm9mZmljZSIgeG1sbnM6dz0idXJuOnNjaGVt YXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6d29yZCIgeG1sbnM6bT0iaHR0cDovL3NjaGVtYXMubWlj cm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9vZmZpY2UvMjAwNC8xMi9vbW1sIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcv VFIvUkVDLWh0bWw0MCI+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIg Y29udGVudD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9IkdlbmVyYXRv ciIgY29udGVudD0iTWljcm9zb2Z0IFdvcmQgMTIgKGZpbHRlcmVkIG1lZGl1bSkiPg0KPHN0eWxl PjwhLS0NCi8qIEZvbnQgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6 5a6L5L2TOw0KCXBhbm9zZS0xOjIgMSA2IDAgMyAxIDEgMSAxIDE7fQ0KQGZvbnQtZmFjZQ0KCXtm b250LWZhbWlseToiQ2FtYnJpYSBNYXRoIjsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDQgNSAzIDUgNCA2IDMgMiA0 O30NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6Q2FsaWJyaTsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDE1IDUg MiAyIDIgNCAzIDIgNDt9DQpAZm9udC1mYWNlDQoJe2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJcQOWui+S9kyI7DQoJ cGFub3NlLTE6MiAxIDYgMCAzIDEgMSAxIDEgMTt9DQpAZm9udC1mYWNlDQoJe2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5 OlRhaG9tYTsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDExIDYgNCAzIDUgNCA0IDIgNDt9DQovKiBTdHlsZSBEZWZp bml0aW9ucyAqLw0KcC5Nc29Ob3JtYWwsIGxpLk1zb05vcm1hbCwgZGl2Lk1zb05vcm1hbA0KCXtt YXJnaW46MGNtOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206LjAwMDFwdDsNCglmb250LXNpemU6MTIuMHB0Ow0K CWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OuWui+S9kzt9DQphOmxpbmssIHNwYW4uTXNvSHlwZXJsaW5rDQoJe21zby1z dHlsZS1wcmlvcml0eTo5OTsNCgljb2xvcjpibHVlOw0KCXRleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjp1bmRlcmxp bmU7fQ0KYTp2aXNpdGVkLCBzcGFuLk1zb0h5cGVybGlua0ZvbGxvd2VkDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1w cmlvcml0eTo5OTsNCgljb2xvcjpwdXJwbGU7DQoJdGV4dC1kZWNvcmF0aW9uOnVuZGVybGluZTt9 DQpzcGFuLmhvZW56Yg0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtbmFtZTpob2VuemI7fQ0Kc3Bhbi5FbWFpbFN0eWxl MTgNCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXR5cGU6cGVyc29uYWwtcmVwbHk7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkNhbGli cmkiLCJzYW5zLXNlcmlmIjsNCgljb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEO30NCi5Nc29DaHBEZWZhdWx0DQoJe21z by1zdHlsZS10eXBlOmV4cG9ydC1vbmx5O30NCkBwYWdlIFdvcmRTZWN0aW9uMQ0KCXtzaXplOjYx Mi4wcHQgNzkyLjBwdDsNCgltYXJnaW46NzIuMHB0IDkwLjBwdCA3Mi4wcHQgOTAuMHB0O30NCmRp di5Xb3JkU2VjdGlvbjENCgl7cGFnZTpXb3JkU2VjdGlvbjE7fQ0KLS0+PC9zdHlsZT48IS0tW2lm IGd0ZSBtc28gOV0+PHhtbD4NCjxvOnNoYXBlZGVmYXVsdHMgdjpleHQ9ImVkaXQiIHNwaWRtYXg9 IjEwMjYiIC8+DQo8L3htbD48IVtlbmRpZl0tLT48IS0tW2lmIGd0ZSBtc28gOV0+PHhtbD4NCjxv OnNoYXBlbGF5b3V0IHY6ZXh0PSJlZGl0Ij4NCjxvOmlkbWFwIHY6ZXh0PSJlZGl0IiBkYXRhPSIx IiAvPg0KPC9vOnNoYXBlbGF5b3V0PjwveG1sPjwhW2VuZGlmXS0tPg0KPC9oZWFkPg0KPGJvZHkg bGFuZz0iWkgtQ04iIGxpbms9ImJsdWUiIHZsaW5rPSJwdXJwbGUiPg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iV29y ZFNlY3Rpb24xIj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIiBzdHls ZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjVwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90 O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDs7Y29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+RGVhciBTdGV3YXJ0LCBBbmR5LCBMb2Es DQo8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBsYW5n PSJFTi1VUyIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC41cHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJy aSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7O2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7 PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVT IiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjVwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1b3Q7 LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDs7Y29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+VGhhbmtzIGZvciB0aGlzIGlu Zm9ybWF0aW9uLCB3ZSB3aWxsIHJlc3VibWl0IHRoZSBkcmFmdHMgd2l0aCBwcm9wZXIgdHJhY2sg YW5kIG5hbWVzIHNvb24uPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1h bCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tVVMiIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuNXB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5 OiZxdW90O0NhbGlicmkmcXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZxdW90Oztjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdE Ij48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3Bh biBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC41cHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7 Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7O2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPkJlc3Qg cmVnYXJkcyw8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3Bh biBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC41cHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7 Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7O2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPkppZTxv OnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVO LVVTIiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjVwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1 b3Q7LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDs7Y29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286 cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPGRpdiBzdHlsZT0iYm9yZGVyOm5vbmU7Ym9yZGVyLWxlZnQ6c29saWQg Ymx1ZSAxLjVwdDtwYWRkaW5nOjBjbSAwY20gMGNtIDQuMHB0Ij4NCjxkaXY+DQo8ZGl2IHN0eWxl PSJib3JkZXI6bm9uZTtib3JkZXItdG9wOnNvbGlkICNCNUM0REYgMS4wcHQ7cGFkZGluZzozLjBw dCAwY20gMGNtIDBjbSI+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48Yj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1V UyIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7VGFob21hJnF1b3Q7 LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDsiPkZyb206PC9zcGFuPjwvYj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1V UyIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7VGFob21hJnF1b3Q7 LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDsiPiBBbmRyZXcgRy4gTWFsaXMgW21haWx0bzphZ21hbGlz QGdtYWlsLmNvbV0NCjxicj4NCjxiPlNlbnQ6PC9iPiBXZWRuZXNkYXksIEFwcmlsIDE1LCAyMDE1 IDI6NDAgQU08YnI+DQo8Yj5Ubzo8L2I+IExvYSBBbmRlcnNzb248YnI+DQo8Yj5DYzo8L2I+IFN0 ZXdhcnQgQnJ5YW50OyBKaWFuZ3l1YW5sb25nOyBHcmVnb3J5IE1pcnNreTsgZHJhZnQtY2hlbmct cHdlMy1tcGxzLXRwLWR1YWwtaG9taW5nLWNvb3JkaW5hdGlvbkB0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZzsgcGFs c0BpZXRmLm9yZzxicj4NCjxiPlN1YmplY3Q6PC9iPiBSZTogW1BhbHNdIFBvbGwgdG8gZGV0ZXJt aW5lIGNvbnNlbnN1cyBmb3IgYWRvcHRpb24gb2YgZHJhZnQtY2hlbmctcHdlMy1tcGxzLXRwLWR1 YWwtaG9taW5nLWNvb3JkaW5hdGlvbiBhcyBXRyBkcmFmdDxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4N CjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyI+ PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwi PjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIj5Mb2EgYW5kIFN0ZXdhcnQsPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9w Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIj48bzpwPiZu YnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFs Ij48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyI+QWN0dWFsbHksIHlvdSdyZSBib3RoIGEgYml0IHdyb25nIDot KSwgaXQgc2hvdWxkIGJlJm5ic3A7PC9zcGFuPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIiBzdHlsZT0iZm9u dC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdCI+ZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1wYWxzLW1wbHMtdHAtZHVhbC1ob21pbmctY29vcmRp bmF0aW9uLjwvc3Bhbj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyI+PG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0K PC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tVVMiPjxv OnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29O b3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdCI+Q2hlZXJz LDwvc3Bhbj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyI+PG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+ DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tVVMiIHN0eWxlPSJm b250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0Ij5BbmR5PC9zcGFuPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIj48bzpwPjwvbzpw Pjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwi PjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8ZGl2Pg0K PHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tVVMiPk9uIFR1ZSwgQXByIDE0LCAy MDE1IGF0IDE6MjMgUE0sIExvYSBBbmRlcnNzb24gJmx0OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpsb2FAcGku bnUiIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj5sb2FAcGkubnU8L2E+Jmd0OyB3cm90ZTo8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwv c3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyI+U3Rld2Fy dCw8YnI+DQo8YnI+DQpTaG91bGRuJ3QgdGhlIGRyYWZ0IGZpbGUgbmFtZSBiZTo8YnI+DQo8YnI+ DQpkcmFmdC1wYWxzLWlldGYtbXBscy10cC1kdWFsLWhvbWluZy1jb29yZGluYXRpb24mbmJzcDsg Pzxicj4NCjxicj4NCi9Mb2E8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxw IGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIj48YnI+DQo8YnI+DQo8YnI+DQpP biAyMDE1LTA0LTE0IDE5OjAwLCBTdGV3YXJ0IEJyeWFudCB3cm90ZTo8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bh bj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyI+QXV0aG9yczxi cj4NCjxicj4NClRoZXJlIGlzIFdHIGNvbnNlbnN1cyB0byBhZG9wdCB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0Ljxicj4N Cjxicj4NClBsZWFzZSByZXN1Ym1pdCBhczxicj4NCjxicj4NCmRyYWZ0LXBhbHMtbXBscy10cC1k dWFsLWhvbWluZy1jb29yZGluYXRpb248YnI+DQo8YnI+DQpUaGFua3M8YnI+DQo8YnI+DQotIFN0 ZXdhcnQ8YnI+DQo8YnI+DQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fXzxicj4NClBhbHMgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0PGJyPg0KPGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOlBhbHNA aWV0Zi5vcmciIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj5QYWxzQGlldGYub3JnPC9hPjxicj4NCjxhIGhyZWY9 Imh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vcGFscyIgdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxh bmsiPmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vcGFsczwvYT48bzpwPjwv bzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyI+ PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJN c29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGNsYXNzPSJob2VuemIiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIiBzdHlsZT0i Y29sb3I6Izg4ODg4OCI+LS0NCjwvc3Bhbj48L3NwYW4+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tVVMiIHN0eWxl PSJjb2xvcjojODg4ODg4Ij48YnI+DQo8YnI+DQo8YnI+DQo8c3BhbiBjbGFzcz0iaG9lbnpiIj5M b2EgQW5kZXJzc29uJm5ic3A7ICZuYnNwOyAmbmJzcDsgJm5ic3A7ICZuYnNwOyAmbmJzcDsgJm5i c3A7ICZuYnNwOyAmbmJzcDsgJm5ic3A7ICZuYnNwOyAmbmJzcDsgZW1haWw6IDxhIGhyZWY9Im1h aWx0bzpsb2FAbWFpbDAxLmh1YXdlaS5jb20iIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj4NCmxvYUBtYWlsMDEu aHVhd2VpLmNvbTwvYT48L3NwYW4+PGJyPg0KPHNwYW4gY2xhc3M9ImhvZW56YiI+U2VuaW9yIE1Q TFMgRXhwZXJ0Jm5ic3A7ICZuYnNwOyAmbmJzcDsgJm5ic3A7ICZuYnNwOyAmbmJzcDsgJm5ic3A7 ICZuYnNwOyAmbmJzcDsgJm5ic3A7ICZuYnNwOyAmbmJzcDsgJm5ic3A7IDxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0 bzpsb2FAcGkubnUiIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj4NCmxvYUBwaS5udTwvYT48L3NwYW4+PGJyPg0K PHNwYW4gY2xhc3M9ImhvZW56YiI+SHVhd2VpIFRlY2hub2xvZ2llcyAoY29uc3VsdGFudCkmbmJz cDsgJm5ic3A7ICZuYnNwO3Bob25lOiA8YSBocmVmPSJ0ZWw6JTJCNDYlMjA3MzklMjA4MSUyMDIx JTIwNjQiIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj4NCiYjNDM7NDYgNzM5IDgxIDIxIDY0PC9hPjwvc3Bhbj48 L3NwYW4+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tVVMiPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxkaXY+DQo8 ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tVVMiPjxicj4NCjxicj4N Cl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fPGJyPg0KUGFs cyBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3Q8YnI+DQo8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86UGFsc0BpZXRmLm9yZyIgdGFyZ2V0 PSJfYmxhbmsiPlBhbHNAaWV0Zi5vcmc8L2E+PGJyPg0KPGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0 Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9wYWxzIiB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cu aWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9wYWxzPC9hPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4N CjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9 IkVOLVVTIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9k aXY+DQo8L2JvZHk+DQo8L2h0bWw+DQo= --_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D06558nkgeml512mbxchi_-- From nobody Wed Apr 15 10:19:16 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDA71B2D51 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 09:47:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.61 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IBMc4lM7nQsu for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 09:47:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.mybrighthouse.com (MX2.mybrighthouse.com [209.16.122.104]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A69AE1B2D8B for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 09:47:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (mx2.mybrighthouse.com [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.mybrighthouse.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t3FGh13V024385; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 12:46:59 -0400 Received: from cnaabex1.corp.local ([10.225.131.11]) by mx2.mybrighthouse.com with ESMTP id 1tssxcs52g-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 15 Apr 2015 12:46:59 -0400 Received: from CNAABEX3.corp.local ([fe80::8cb1:5fdb:b0df:98de]) by CNAABEX1.corp.local ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0181.006; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 12:46:58 -0400 From: "Mallette, Edwin J." To: "stbryant@cisco.com" , "pals@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? Thread-Index: AQHQd5vJBsIM2P3v70+Uqy3PXi501g== Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:46:58 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.8.150116 x-originating-ip: [10.225.5.12] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1504150138 Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 10:19:15 -0700 Cc: "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:47:13 -0000 Support as co-author. Ed >-----Original Message----- >From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stbryant@cisco.com] >Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 1:12 AM >To: pals@ietf.org >Cc: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org >Subject: Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? > >This is to start a two week WG poll to determine whether >we should adopt > >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon-03 > >This poll will close on 29th April 2015 > >- Stewart >_______________________________________________ >Pals mailing list >Pals@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals ________________________________ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain information that is privile= ged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. **If you are not = the intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately= by return e-mail, purge it and do not disseminate or copy it. From nobody Wed Apr 15 11:10:31 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71941A00B2 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:10:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3WbYyUWgwjt0 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:10:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD1A51A008B for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:10:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2042; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429121428; x=1430331028; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=tShz6/Fw5mM5CR6AGNZtNJyoHp2s1kjUZaxGkhQ6kXM=; b=AdXgqJbbupcuD+A83cd7k2djuDm1m2SRzwdxNPGO0mjmvVKHsjVK4eCb nWnOruQ4LKsUIKmZZnx1qma6fYY8td4HszwctlSmaHRMIdfAyLU573xxJ vIxWDe9oJEgZPVY6dj/OpqzmujCqgy+x4UwM196PGpsYdLRehBwDhGPig 4=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AXBQAfqS5V/4cNJK1cgwxSXAWDEMQrCoYDAhyBH0wBAQEBAQF+hCABAQEEAQEBIBE6CwwEAgEIEQMBAQEDAiMDAgICJQsUAQgIAgQBDQWIKg2vIJVIAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEwSBIYoKhEkIKwcCAgKCYi+BFgEEjnqCHIN7hByCAYEdEYMnkCQig29vgUR/AQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,582,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="412195173" Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Apr 2015 18:10:28 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com [173.37.183.77]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3FIARcv019116 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:10:27 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.6.251]) by xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([173.37.183.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 13:10:27 -0500 From: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" To: "Mallette, Edwin J." , "Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" , "pals@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? Thread-Index: AQHQd5vJBsIM2P3v70+Uqy3PXi501p1OcHEA Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:10:26 +0000 Message-ID: <9BD98921-2C05-4EB6-B0C4-8983A41976CF@cisco.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/15.7.0.150202 x-originating-ip: [10.82.243.97] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:10:30 -0000 U3VwcG9ydC4NCg0KLS0gDQpDaGVlcnMsDQpSYWppdiANCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KLS0tLS1Pcmln aW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206IDxNYWxsZXR0ZT4sICJFZHdpbiBKLiINCkRhdGU6IFdl ZG5lc2RheSwgQXByaWwgMTUsIDIwMTUgYXQgMTI6NDYgUE0NClRvOiAiU3Rld2FydCBCcnlhbnQg KHN0YnJ5YW50KSIsICJwYWxzQGlldGYub3JnIg0KQ2M6ICJkcmFmdC1qaWFuZy1wd2UzLW1jLXBv bkB0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZyIsICJwYWxzLWNoYWlyc0B0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZyINClN1YmplY3Q6 IFJlOiBbUGFsc10gU2hvdWxkIHRoZSBQQUxTIFdHIGFkb3B0IGRyYWZ0LWppYW5nLXB3ZTMtbWMt cG9uPw0KDQo+U3VwcG9ydCBhcyBjby1hdXRob3IuDQo+DQo+RWQNCj4NCj4+LS0tLS1PcmlnaW5h bCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCj4+RnJvbTogU3Rld2FydCBCcnlhbnQgW21haWx0bzpzdGJyeWFudEBj aXNjby5jb21dDQo+PlNlbnQ6IFdlZG5lc2RheSwgQXByaWwgMTUsIDIwMTUgMToxMiBBTQ0KPj5U bzogcGFsc0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KPj5DYzogZHJhZnQtamlhbmctcHdlMy1tYy1wb25AdG9vbHMuaWV0 Zi5vcmc7IHBhbHMtY2hhaXJzQHRvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnDQo+PlN1YmplY3Q6IFNob3VsZCB0aGUg UEFMUyBXRyBhZG9wdCBkcmFmdC1qaWFuZy1wd2UzLW1jLXBvbj8NCj4+DQo+PlRoaXMgaXMgdG8g c3RhcnQgYSB0d28gd2VlayBXRyBwb2xsIHRvIGRldGVybWluZSB3aGV0aGVyDQo+PndlIHNob3Vs ZCBhZG9wdA0KPj4NCj4+aHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWppYW5nLXB3 ZTMtbWMtcG9uLTAzDQo+Pg0KPj5UaGlzIHBvbGwgd2lsbCBjbG9zZSBvbiAgMjl0aCBBcHJpbCAy MDE1DQo+Pg0KPj4tIFN0ZXdhcnQNCj4+X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj4+UGFscyBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCj4+UGFsc0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KPj5o dHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3BhbHMNCj4NCj4NCj5fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KPg0KPkNPTkZJREVOVElBTElUWSBOT1RJQ0U6IFRo aXMgZS1tYWlsIG1heSBjb250YWluIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIHRoYXQgaXMgDQo+cHJpdmlsZWdlZCwg Y29uZmlkZW50aWFsIG9yIG90aGVyd2lzZSBwcm90ZWN0ZWQgZnJvbSBkaXNjbG9zdXJlLiAqKklm IHlvdSANCj5hcmUgbm90IHRoZSBpbnRlbmRlZCByZWNpcGllbnQgb2YgdGhpcyBlLW1haWwsIHBs ZWFzZSBub3RpZnkgdGhlIHNlbmRlciANCj5pbW1lZGlhdGVseSBieSByZXR1cm4gZS1tYWlsLCBw dXJnZSBpdCBhbmQgZG8gbm90IGRpc3NlbWluYXRlIG9yIGNvcHkgaXQuDQo+DQo+X19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj5QYWxzIG1haWxpbmcgbGlz dA0KPlBhbHNAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj5odHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZv L3BhbHMNCg== From nobody Wed Apr 15 17:41:54 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E0B1ACEF0 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:41:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57A83oMvq7Zo for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:41:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D04931A8BB6 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:41:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BRL60706; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:41:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.35) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 01:41:48 +0100 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.135]) by nkgeml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.35]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 08:41:40 +0800 From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" To: "stbryant@cisco.com" , "pals@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? Thread-Index: AQHQdtbJKgRxIzt0Mke5/TmFPx6iCZ1Ozmcw Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:41:40 +0000 Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D07D08@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.97.131] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Cc: "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:41:53 -0000 Support. -Jie > -----Original Message----- > From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant > Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 1:12 AM > To: pals@ietf.org > Cc: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org > Subject: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? >=20 > This is to start a two week WG poll to determine whether we should adopt >=20 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon-03 >=20 > This poll will close on 29th April 2015 >=20 > - Stewart >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Pals mailing list > Pals@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals From nobody Wed Apr 15 20:07:07 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662291B2D31 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:07:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M5e6hUiCCiKC for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:07:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 152C31B2D1B for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:07:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BUX72193; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:07:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.73) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 04:07:00 +0100 Received: from SZXEMA509-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.160]) by SZXEMA414-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:06:53 +0800 From: "Hongyu Li (Julio)" To: "stbryant@cisco.com" , "pals@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? Thread-Index: AQHQdtbINWc/wJom60aeG41JNASh1p1O9wmw Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:06:53 +0000 Message-ID: <6EB34CB5D82C4645B826C56144826EA9A2F57883@SZXEMA509-MBX.china.huawei.com> References: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.66.114.234] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Cc: "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:07:05 -0000 U3VwcG9ydC4NCg0KSG9uZ3l1DQoNCi0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQpGcm9tOiBQ YWxzIFttYWlsdG86cGFscy1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXSBPbiBCZWhhbGYgT2YgU3Rld2FydCBC cnlhbnQNClNlbnQ6IFdlZG5lc2RheSwgQXByaWwgMTUsIDIwMTUgMToxMiBBTQ0KVG86IHBhbHNA aWV0Zi5vcmcNCkNjOiBkcmFmdC1qaWFuZy1wd2UzLW1jLXBvbkB0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZzsgcGFs cy1jaGFpcnNAdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcNClN1YmplY3Q6IFtQYWxzXSBTaG91bGQgdGhlIFBBTFMg V0cgYWRvcHQgZHJhZnQtamlhbmctcHdlMy1tYy1wb24/DQoNClRoaXMgaXMgdG8gc3RhcnQgYSB0 d28gd2VlayBXRyBwb2xsIHRvIGRldGVybWluZSB3aGV0aGVyIHdlIHNob3VsZCBhZG9wdA0KDQpo dHRwczovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQtamlhbmctcHdlMy1tYy1wb24tMDMNCg0K VGhpcyBwb2xsIHdpbGwgY2xvc2Ugb24gIDI5dGggQXByaWwgMjAxNQ0KDQotIFN0ZXdhcnQNCg0K X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NClBhbHMgbWFp bGluZyBsaXN0DQpQYWxzQGlldGYub3JnDQpodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xp c3RpbmZvL3BhbHMNCg== From nobody Wed Apr 15 20:12:40 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E3B1B2D55 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:12:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Irobuz2V_K9 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:12:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from corp.21cn.com (corp.forptr.21cn.com [121.14.129.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B761B2D41 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:12:33 -0700 (PDT) HMM_SOURCE_IP: 10.28.10.162:55577.250789288 HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000 HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP Received: from shenchb-nb (unknown [10.28.10.162]) by corp.21cn.com (HERMES) with ESMTP id 9A4E73E400C; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:12:03 +0800 (CST) Received: from shenchb-nb ([106.37.81.42]) by 21CN-entas1(MEDUSA 10.28.10.162) with ESMTP id 1429153923.12514 for hongyu.li@huawei.com ; Thu Apr 16 11:12:15 2015 0/X-Total-Score: -120: X-FILTER-SCORE: to=<89908f889a964f8d8a6189968298868a4f84908e949583939a828f9561848a9484904f84908e91828d94618a8695874f90938885938287954e8b8a828f884e919886544e8e844e91908f619590908d944f8a8695874f90938891828d944e8489828a9394619590908d944f8a8695874f909388>, score=<14291539351XX8Xh18dnG4p2XXXXXhXXssos4voZ5l0EQsssss4ssv> X-REAL-FROM: shencb@sttri.com.cn X-Receive-IP: 106.37.81.42 shencb@sttri.com.cn Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:12:01 +0800 From: "shencb@sttri.com.cn" To: "Hongyu Li (Julio)" , "stbryant@cisco.com" , "pals@ietf.org" References: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com>, <6EB34CB5D82C4645B826C56144826EA9A2F57883@SZXEMA509-MBX.china.huawei.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Has-Attach: no X-Mailer: Foxmail 7, 2, 6, 42[cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <201504161112012426454@sttri.com.cn> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart821510685364_=----" Archived-At: Cc: "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:12:40 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_001_NextPart821510685364_=---- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 c3VwcG9ydO+8gQ0KICAgICAgc2hlbiBjaGVuZ2Jpbg0KDQoNCg0Kc2hlbmNiQHN0dHJpLmNvbS5j bg0KIA0KRnJvbTogSG9uZ3l1IExpIChKdWxpbykNCkRhdGU6IDIwMTUtMDQtMTYgMTE6MDYNClRv OiBzdGJyeWFudEBjaXNjby5jb207IHBhbHNAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCkNDOiBkcmFmdC1qaWFuZy1wd2Uz LW1jLXBvbkB0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZzsgcGFscy1jaGFpcnNAdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcNClN1Ympl Y3Q6IFJFOiBbUGFsc10gU2hvdWxkIHRoZSBQQUxTIFdHIGFkb3B0IGRyYWZ0LWppYW5nLXB3ZTMt bWMtcG9uPw0KU3VwcG9ydC4NCiANCkhvbmd5dQ0KIA0KLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0t LS0NCkZyb206IFBhbHMgW21haWx0bzpwYWxzLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmddIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBP ZiBTdGV3YXJ0IEJyeWFudA0KU2VudDogV2VkbmVzZGF5LCBBcHJpbCAxNSwgMjAxNSAxOjEyIEFN DQpUbzogcGFsc0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KQ2M6IGRyYWZ0LWppYW5nLXB3ZTMtbWMtcG9uQHRvb2xzLmll dGYub3JnOyBwYWxzLWNoYWlyc0B0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZw0KU3ViamVjdDogW1BhbHNdIFNob3Vs ZCB0aGUgUEFMUyBXRyBhZG9wdCBkcmFmdC1qaWFuZy1wd2UzLW1jLXBvbj8NCiANClRoaXMgaXMg dG8gc3RhcnQgYSB0d28gd2VlayBXRyBwb2xsIHRvIGRldGVybWluZSB3aGV0aGVyIHdlIHNob3Vs ZCBhZG9wdA0KIA0KaHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWppYW5nLXB3ZTMt bWMtcG9uLTAzDQogDQpUaGlzIHBvbGwgd2lsbCBjbG9zZSBvbiAgMjl0aCBBcHJpbCAyMDE1DQog DQotIFN0ZXdhcnQNCiANCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fDQpQYWxzIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KUGFsc0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0 Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9wYWxzDQo= ------=_001_NextPart821510685364_=---- Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A
support=EF=BC=81
=
      shen chengbin
=0A

=0A
shencb@sttri.com.cn
=0A
&nb= sp;
Date: 2= 015-04-16 11:06
CC: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang= -pwe3-mc-pon?
Support.
=0A
 =0A
Hongyu
=0A
 
=0A
-----Original Message----= -
=0A
From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stew= art Bryant
=0A
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 1:12 AM
=0ATo: pals@ietf.org
=0A
Cc: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.o= rg; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org
=0A
Subject: [Pals] Should the PAL= S WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?
=0A
 
=0A
This = is to start a two week WG poll to determine whether we should adopt
= =0A
 
=0A
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-pwe3-m= c-pon-03
=0A
 
=0A
This poll will close on  29= th April 2015
=0A
 
=0A
- Stewart
=0A
&nbs= p;
=0A
_______________________________________________
=0APals mailing list
=0A
Pals@ietf.org
=0A
https://www.i= etf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals
=0A
=0A ------=_001_NextPart821510685364_=------ From nobody Wed Apr 15 20:24:01 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF381B2E27 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:23:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Olh8on3jKLQl for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:23:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE9E11B2E42 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:22:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BUX73231; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:22:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.32) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 04:22:51 +0100 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.135]) by nkgeml401-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.32]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:22:43 +0800 From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" To: "stbryant@cisco.com" , "pals@ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org" , Matthew Bocci , pals-ads , "Wanghaibo (Rainsword)" Thread-Topic: WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe Thread-Index: AQHQdtM8TkQ0ufcQ0Eum4LRqbewdBZ1O+2vA Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:22:42 +0000 Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D07DC5@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <20150127144432.4057.11091.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <552D456B.8050205@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <552D456B.8050205@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.97.131] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:23:59 -0000 U3VwcG9ydCBhcyBjby1hdXRob3IuDQoNCkJlc3QgcmVnYXJkcywNCkppZQ0KDQo+IC0tLS0tT3Jp Z2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQo+IEZyb206IFN0ZXdhcnQgQnJ5YW50IFttYWlsdG86c3Ricnlh bnRAY2lzY28uY29tXQ0KPiBTZW50OiBXZWRuZXNkYXksIEFwcmlsIDE1LCAyMDE1IDEyOjUxIEFN DQo+IFRvOiBwYWxzQGlldGYub3JnOyBwYWxzLWNoYWlyc0B0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZzsNCj4gZHJh ZnQtaWV0Zi1wYWxzLXJlZHVuZGFuY3ktc3BlQHRvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnOyBNYXR0aGV3IEJvY2Np OyBwYWxzLWFkczsNCj4gV2FuZ2hhaWJvIChSYWluc3dvcmQpDQo+IFN1YmplY3Q6IFdHIExhc3Qg Q2FsbCAtIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtcGFscy1yZWR1bmRhbmN5LXNwZQ0KPiANCj4gDQo+IFRoaXMgZW1h aWwgc3RhcnRzIHRoZSBXRyBsYXN0IGNhbGwgb24gZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1wYWxzLXJlZHVuZGFuY3kt c3BlDQo+IA0KPiBUaGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IGNhbiBiZSBmb3VuZCBhdA0KPiANCj4gaHR0cHM6Ly9k YXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9kb2MvZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1wYWxzLXJlZHVuZGFuY3ktc3BlLw0K PiANCj4gTGFzdCBjYWxsIHdpbGwgY2xvc2Ugb24gMjl0aCBBcHJpbCAyMDE1DQo+IA0KPiAtIFN0 ZXdhcnQNCg== From nobody Wed Apr 15 20:40:03 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1BA1B2E92 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:40:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w5uRqPm4-jvQ for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:40:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2ACF1B2E8D for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:39:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BUX74379; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:39:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.72) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 04:39:57 +0100 Received: from SZXEMA506-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.68]) by SZXEMA413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.72]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:39:53 +0800 From: "Yemin (Amy)" To: "stbryant@cisco.com" , "pals@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? Thread-Index: AQHQdtYilK9rKSBZkESmN//9kSw6bp1O/0Bg Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:39:52 +0000 Message-ID: <9C5FD3EFA72E1740A3D41BADDE0B461F8F404290@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> References: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.169.33.63] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Cc: "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:40:02 -0000 Support. PON is widely deployment in the network, it's useful to have such an protec= tion extension.=20 BR, Amy -----Original Message----- From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 1:12 AM To: pals@ietf.org Cc: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org Subject: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? This is to start a two week WG poll to determine whether we should adopt https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon-03 This poll will close on 29th April 2015 - Stewart _______________________________________________ Pals mailing list Pals@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals From nobody Wed Apr 15 20:44:50 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4FC1B2EE3 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:44:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hy1XiqT-wqer for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:44:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from corp.21cn.com (corp.forptr.21cn.com [121.14.133.8]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3711B2EE0 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:44:44 -0700 (PDT) HMM_SOURCE_IP: 10.28.101.7:42051.606655680 HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000 HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP Received: from shenchb-nb (unknown [10.28.101.7]) by corp.21cn.com (HERMES) with ESMTP id 6FEDED68104; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:44:14 +0800 (CST) Received: from shenchb-nb ([106.37.81.42]) by 21CN-ent7-3(MEDUSA 10.28.101.7) with ESMTP id 1429155851.18346 for amy.yemin@huawei.com ; Thu Apr 16 11:44:26 2015 0/X-Total-Score: -120: X-FILTER-SCORE: to=<828e9a4f9a868e8a8f6189968298868a4f84908e949583939a828f9561848a9484904f84908e91828d94618a8695874f90938885938287954e8b8a828f884e919886544e8e844e91908f619590908d944f8a8695874f90938891828d944e8489828a9394619590908d944f8a8695874f909388>, score=<1429155866ayqwwwwwHwwcwwWwHcWnASC9bvvvvvFvvIvvevFIeDHd> X-REAL-FROM: shencb@sttri.com.cn X-Receive-IP: 106.37.81.42 shencb@sttri.com.cn Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:44:12 +0800 From: "shencb@sttri.com.cn" To: "Yemin (Amy)" , "stbryant@cisco.com" , "pals@ietf.org" References: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com>, <9C5FD3EFA72E1740A3D41BADDE0B461F8F404290@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Has-Attach: no X-Mailer: Foxmail 7, 2, 6, 42[cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <2015041611440980863012@sttri.com.cn> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart571781346145_=----" Archived-At: Cc: "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:44:49 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_001_NextPart571781346145_=---- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 U1VQUE9SVCENCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIFNoZW4gQ2hlbmdiaW4NCg0KDQoNCnNo ZW5jYkBzdHRyaS5jb20uY24NCiANCkZyb206IFllbWluIChBbXkpDQpEYXRlOiAyMDE1LTA0LTE2 IDExOjM5DQpUbzogc3RicnlhbnRAY2lzY28uY29tOyBwYWxzQGlldGYub3JnDQpDQzogZHJhZnQt amlhbmctcHdlMy1tYy1wb25AdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmc7IHBhbHMtY2hhaXJzQHRvb2xzLmlldGYu b3JnDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSRTogW1BhbHNdIFNob3VsZCB0aGUgUEFMUyBXRyBhZG9wdCBkcmFmdC1q aWFuZy1wd2UzLW1jLXBvbj8NClN1cHBvcnQuDQpQT04gaXMgd2lkZWx5IGRlcGxveW1lbnQgaW4g dGhlIG5ldHdvcmssIGl0J3MgdXNlZnVsIHRvIGhhdmUgc3VjaCBhbiBwcm90ZWN0aW9uIGV4dGVu c2lvbi4gDQogDQpCUiwNCkFteQ0KIA0KLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206 IFBhbHMgW21haWx0bzpwYWxzLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmddIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiBTdGV3YXJ0 IEJyeWFudA0KU2VudDogV2VkbmVzZGF5LCBBcHJpbCAxNSwgMjAxNSAxOjEyIEFNDQpUbzogcGFs c0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KQ2M6IGRyYWZ0LWppYW5nLXB3ZTMtbWMtcG9uQHRvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnOyBw YWxzLWNoYWlyc0B0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZw0KU3ViamVjdDogW1BhbHNdIFNob3VsZCB0aGUgUEFM UyBXRyBhZG9wdCBkcmFmdC1qaWFuZy1wd2UzLW1jLXBvbj8NCiANClRoaXMgaXMgdG8gc3RhcnQg YSB0d28gd2VlayBXRyBwb2xsIHRvIGRldGVybWluZSB3aGV0aGVyIHdlIHNob3VsZCBhZG9wdA0K IA0KaHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWppYW5nLXB3ZTMtbWMtcG9uLTAz DQogDQpUaGlzIHBvbGwgd2lsbCBjbG9zZSBvbiAgMjl0aCBBcHJpbCAyMDE1DQogDQotIFN0ZXdh cnQNCiANCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQpQ YWxzIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KUGFsc0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFp bG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9wYWxzDQogDQo= ------=_001_NextPart571781346145_=---- Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A
SUPPORT!
        &n= bsp;               Shen Chengbin
= =0A

=0A
shencb@sttri.com.cn
=0A
 
From:=  Yemin (Amy)
Date: 2015-04-16 11:39
Subject: RE: [Pals] Should the PALS = WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?
Support.=0A
PON is widely deployment in the network, it's useful to have such= an protection extension.
=0A
 
=0A
BR,
=0AAmy
=0A
 
=0A
-----Original Message-----
= =0A
From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bry= ant
=0A
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 1:12 AM
=0A
To: = pals@ietf.org
=0A
Cc: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org; pal= s-chairs@tools.ietf.org
=0A
Subject: [Pals] Should the PALS WG ad= opt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?
=0A
 
=0A
This is to s= tart a two week WG poll to determine whether we should adopt
=0A
=  
=0A
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon-03=
=0A
 
=0A
This poll will close on  29th April= 2015
=0A
 
=0A
- Stewart
=0A
 
= =0A
_______________________________________________
=0A
Pals = mailing list
=0A
Pals@ietf.org
=0A
https://www.ietf.org/= mailman/listinfo/pals
=0A
 
=0A
=0A ------=_001_NextPart571781346145_=------ From nobody Thu Apr 16 01:37:58 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E4D1B2C39 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 01:37:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.078 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.078 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SgPb4m64x1XZ for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 01:37:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C3B51B2C38 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 01:37:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BUY00961; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 08:37:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.72) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:37:51 +0100 Received: from SZXEMA501-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.31]) by SZXEMA413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.72]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 16:37:46 +0800 From: Puyun To: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" , "Mallette, Edwin J." , "Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" , "pals@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? Thread-Index: AQHQd5vJ24cno6JAQUGK+uCoV3fso51N2ZEAgAF4XVA= Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 08:37:46 +0000 Message-ID: References: <9BD98921-2C05-4EB6-B0C4-8983A41976CF@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <9BD98921-2C05-4EB6-B0C4-8983A41976CF@cisco.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.146.78.176] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Cc: "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" Subject: [Pals] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogIFNob3VsZCB0aGUgUEFMUyBXRyBhZG9wdCBk?= =?gb2312?b?cmFmdC1qaWFuZy1wd2UzLW1jLXBvbj8=?= X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 08:37:57 -0000 U3VwcG9ydA0KDQoNCi0tLS0t08q8/tStvP4tLS0tLQ0Kt6K8/sjLOiBQYWxzIFttYWlsdG86cGFs cy1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXSC0+rHtIFJhaml2IEFzYXRpIChyYWppdmEpDQq3osvNyrG85Dog MjAxNcTqNNTCMTbI1SAyOjEwDQrK1bz+yMs6IE1hbGxldHRlLCBFZHdpbiBKLjsgU3Rld2FydCBC cnlhbnQgKHN0YnJ5YW50KTsgcGFsc0BpZXRmLm9yZw0Ks63LzTogZHJhZnQtamlhbmctcHdlMy1t Yy1wb25AdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmc7IHBhbHMtY2hhaXJzQHRvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnDQrW98ziOiBS ZTogW1BhbHNdIFNob3VsZCB0aGUgUEFMUyBXRyBhZG9wdCBkcmFmdC1qaWFuZy1wd2UzLW1jLXBv bj8NCg0KU3VwcG9ydC4NCg0KLS0gDQpDaGVlcnMsDQpSYWppdiANCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KLS0t LS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206IDxNYWxsZXR0ZT4sICJFZHdpbiBKLiINCkRh dGU6IFdlZG5lc2RheSwgQXByaWwgMTUsIDIwMTUgYXQgMTI6NDYgUE0NClRvOiAiU3Rld2FydCBC cnlhbnQgKHN0YnJ5YW50KSIsICJwYWxzQGlldGYub3JnIg0KQ2M6ICJkcmFmdC1qaWFuZy1wd2Uz LW1jLXBvbkB0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZyIsICJwYWxzLWNoYWlyc0B0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZyINClN1 YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBbUGFsc10gU2hvdWxkIHRoZSBQQUxTIFdHIGFkb3B0IGRyYWZ0LWppYW5nLXB3 ZTMtbWMtcG9uPw0KDQo+U3VwcG9ydCBhcyBjby1hdXRob3IuDQo+DQo+RWQNCj4NCj4+LS0tLS1P cmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCj4+RnJvbTogU3Rld2FydCBCcnlhbnQgW21haWx0bzpzdGJy eWFudEBjaXNjby5jb21dDQo+PlNlbnQ6IFdlZG5lc2RheSwgQXByaWwgMTUsIDIwMTUgMToxMiBB TQ0KPj5UbzogcGFsc0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KPj5DYzogZHJhZnQtamlhbmctcHdlMy1tYy1wb25AdG9v bHMuaWV0Zi5vcmc7IHBhbHMtY2hhaXJzQHRvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnDQo+PlN1YmplY3Q6IFNob3Vs ZCB0aGUgUEFMUyBXRyBhZG9wdCBkcmFmdC1qaWFuZy1wd2UzLW1jLXBvbj8NCj4+DQo+PlRoaXMg aXMgdG8gc3RhcnQgYSB0d28gd2VlayBXRyBwb2xsIHRvIGRldGVybWluZSB3aGV0aGVyDQo+Pndl IHNob3VsZCBhZG9wdA0KPj4NCj4+aHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWpp YW5nLXB3ZTMtbWMtcG9uLTAzDQo+Pg0KPj5UaGlzIHBvbGwgd2lsbCBjbG9zZSBvbiAgMjl0aCBB cHJpbCAyMDE1DQo+Pg0KPj4tIFN0ZXdhcnQNCj4+X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj4+UGFscyBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCj4+UGFsc0BpZXRmLm9y Zw0KPj5odHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3BhbHMNCj4NCj4NCj5f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KPg0KPkNPTkZJREVOVElBTElUWSBOT1RJ Q0U6IFRoaXMgZS1tYWlsIG1heSBjb250YWluIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIHRoYXQgaXMgDQo+cHJpdmls ZWdlZCwgY29uZmlkZW50aWFsIG9yIG90aGVyd2lzZSBwcm90ZWN0ZWQgZnJvbSBkaXNjbG9zdXJl LiAqKklmIHlvdSANCj5hcmUgbm90IHRoZSBpbnRlbmRlZCByZWNpcGllbnQgb2YgdGhpcyBlLW1h aWwsIHBsZWFzZSBub3RpZnkgdGhlIHNlbmRlciANCj5pbW1lZGlhdGVseSBieSByZXR1cm4gZS1t YWlsLCBwdXJnZSBpdCBhbmQgZG8gbm90IGRpc3NlbWluYXRlIG9yIGNvcHkgaXQuDQo+DQo+X19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj5QYWxzIG1haWxp bmcgbGlzdA0KPlBhbHNAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj5odHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xp c3RpbmZvL3BhbHMNCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fDQpQYWxzIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KUGFsc0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5v cmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9wYWxzDQo= From nobody Thu Apr 16 03:25:16 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C981B3103; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:25:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SMIxfp8gScuF; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:25:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1621B30FD; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:25:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150416102511.20495.95859.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:25:11 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: pals@ietf.org Subject: [Pals] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination-00.txt X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:25:13 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. Title : Dual-Homing Coordination for MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Pseudowires Protection Authors : Weiqiang Cheng Lei Wang Han Li Kai Liu Shahram Davari Jie Dong Alessandro D'Alessandro Filename : draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination-00.txt Pages : 13 Date : 2015-04-15 Abstract: In some scenarios, the MPLS Trasport Profile (MPLS-TP) Pseudowires (PWs) are provisioned through either static configuration or management plane, where a dynamic control plane is not available. A fast protection mechanism for MPLS-TP PWs is needed to protect against the failure of Attachment Circuit (AC), the failure of Provider Edge (PE) and also the failure in the Packet Switched Network (PSN). The framework and scenarios for dual-homing pseudowire (PW) local protection are described in [draft-ietf-pals- mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection]. This document proposes a dual- homing coordination mechanism for MPLS-TP PWs, which is used for state exchange and coordination between the dual-homing PEs for dual- homing PW local protection. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Thu Apr 16 03:26:05 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EE91B30F2; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:26:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WGwKPQYdoKzD; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:26:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6981B310F; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:25:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150416102547.20495.3224.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:25:47 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: pals@ietf.org Subject: [Pals] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection-00.txt X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:26:03 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. Title : Dual-Homing Protection for MPLS and MPLS-TP Pseudowires Authors : Weiqiang Cheng Lei Wang Han Li Kai Liu Shahram Davari Jie Dong Alessandro D'Alessandro Filename : draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection-00.txt Pages : 10 Date : 2015-04-15 Abstract: This document describes a framework and several scenarios for pseudowire (PW) dual-homing local protection. A Dual-Node Interconncetion (DNI) PW is provisioned between the dual-homing Provider Edge (PE) nodes for carrying traffic when failure accurs in the Attachment Circuit (AC) or PW side. In order for the dual-homing PE nodes to determine the forwarding state of AC, PW and the DNI PW, necessary state exchange and coordination between the dual-homing PEs are needed. The PW dual-homing local protection mechanism is complementary to the existing PW protection mechanisms. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Fri Apr 17 01:25:33 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C841B2AD8 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 01:25:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.791 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.791 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BaNe1ssEJrSU for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 01:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sendg.mailex.chinaunicom.cn (sendg.mailex.chinaunicom.cn [210.53.66.230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88E61B2AD7 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 01:25:22 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 0a000f34-f79426d000007be8-d6-5530c3700210 Received: from M10-CEN-MLHUB02.cnc.intra ( [10.0.192.42]) by sendg.mailex.chinaunicom.cn (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 52.95.31720.073C0355; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:25:20 +0800 (HKT) Received: from M10-HQ-MLCH02.hq.cnc.intra (10.0.15.27) by M10-CEN-MLHUB02.cnc.intra (10.0.192.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.213.0; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:25:19 +0800 Received: from GTZhou-PC (114.255.193.227) by M10-HQ-MLCH02.hq.cnc.intra (10.0.15.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.213.0; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:25:19 +0800 Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:28:13 +0800 From: zhouguangtao To: "stbryant@cisco.com" , "pals@ietf.org" References: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Has-Attach: no X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.0.1.91[cn] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <201504171625078820122@chinaunicom.cn> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart346383486780_=----" X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpileLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42LhYjigpVtw2CDUYOdxaYumW++ZLJ5fWcBo sebfOiaLc0/nMDqweEz5vZHVY8mSn0weXy5/ZgtgjqqzSczLyy9JLElVSEktTrZVCs5Mz0ss KS1KVfAvLUnKL81LUVLITLFVMlZSKMhJTE7NTc0rsVVKLChIBcrYcSlgABugssw8hdS85PyU zLx0W6XQEDddCyW7p8uans2b86xpxcspM1+sX/+sb+mzKdsSrrBk/Ji6hb1gm1zFsmnHWRsY v0t3MXJySAiYSPT9PcMGYYtJXLi3Hsjm4hASOMAoce5WOzuEs4VR4tTSXhYIZxGjxOunvWAt LAKqEm9O3WACsdkEDCTeP93FDmKLCARKNH1qZgaxmQUmM0qc3V3RxcjBISxgJ3HjUSqIKSSg IbH6thTEYl6JGe1PWSBsAYmbWyZAHSQnsf3UWrA4r4CgxMmZT6BsI4kvq2+zQ0wPkzi2expY PcjIpY8WM09gFJqFpGUWkrJZQJuZBTQl1u/ShwgrSkzpfsgOYWtItM6ZC2VrSyxb+Jp5ASPb KkauYF93C2MLA11/o02M4PjnN9nB+HCh6yFGAQ5GJR7e1DCDUCHWxLLiytxDjBIczEoivBzb gEK8KYmVValF+fFFpTmpxYcYTYHhNZFZSjQ5H5ia8kriDU2MjMyMDE3NLcwNDJXEefeFSIUK CaQD00h2ampBahFMHxMHp1QDo1XCy4I3rbUXTPsPn93776XEbA3ffZklayr+yr4O1bV4xKQb taZbKeL589hjHNU8f/U6DgVzvw190j/p2pxTi2+tLTuzQtnX/sV9m7A3ceIT7zrf+vfuWsZk PofPOs6hT39kxjzICUk0qMuzeTb7SWFFOHvUorjAqkoHvUNcB+6yBgr9YXa3U2Ipzkg01GIu Kk4EAMwu7iwVAwAA Archived-At: Cc: "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 08:25:31 -0000 ------=_001_NextPart346383486780_=---- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" content-transfer-encoding: base64 c3VwcG9ydC4NCg0KVGhhbmtzLA0KR3Vhbmd0YW8gIFpob3UNClNlbmlvciBFbmdpbmVlciAN Ck5ldHdvcmsgVGVjaG5vbG9neSBSZXNlYXJjaCBJbnN0aXR1dGUgb2YgQ2hpbmEgVW5pY29t DQogIA0KRnJvbTogU3Rld2FydCBCcnlhbnQNCkRhdGU6IDIwMTUtMDQtMTUgMDE6MTENClRv OiBwYWxzQGlldGYub3JnDQpDQzogZHJhZnQtamlhbmctcHdlMy1tYy1wb25AdG9vbHMuaWV0 Zi5vcmc7IHBhbHMtY2hhaXJzQHRvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBTaG91bGQgdGhl IFBBTFMgV0cgYWRvcHQgZHJhZnQtamlhbmctcHdlMy1tYy1wb24/DQpUaGlzIGlzIHRvIHN0 YXJ0IGEgdHdvIHdlZWsgV0cgcG9sbCB0byBkZXRlcm1pbmUgd2hldGhlcg0Kd2Ugc2hvdWxk IGFkb3B0DQoNCmh0dHBzOi8vdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRtbC9kcmFmdC1qaWFuZy1wd2Uz LW1jLXBvbi0wMw0KDQpUaGlzIHBvbGwgd2lsbCBjbG9zZSBvbiAgMjl0aCBBcHJpbCAyMDE1 DQoNCi0gU3Rld2FydA0K5aaC5p6c5oKo6ZSZ6K+v5o6l5pS25LqG6K+l6YKu5Lu277yM6K+3 6YCa6L+H55S15a2Q6YKu5Lu256uL5Y2z6YCa55+l5oiR5Lus44CC6K+35Zue5aSN6YKu5Lu2 5YiwaHFzLXNwbWNAY2hpbmF1bmljb20uY27vvIzljbPlj6/ku6XpgIDorqLmraTpgq7ku7bj gILmiJHku6zlsIbnq4vljbPlsIbmgqjnmoTkv6Hmga/ku47miJHku6znmoTlj5HpgIHnm67l vZXkuK3liKDpmaTjgIINCklmIHlvdSBoYXZlIHJlY2VpdmVkIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgaW4gZXJy b3IgcGxlYXNlIG5vdGlmeSB1cyBpbW1lZGlhdGVseSBieSBlLW1haWwuIFBsZWFzZSByZXBs eSB0byBocXMtc3BtY0BjaGluYXVuaWNvbS5jbiBpZiB5b3Ugd2FudCB0byB1bnN1YnNjcmli ZSBmcm9tIHRoaXMgbWFpbC4gV2Ugd2lsbCBpbW1lZGlhdGVseSByZW1vdmUgeW91ciBpbmZv cm1hdGlvbiBmcm9tIG91ciBzZW5kaW5nIGNhdGFsb2d1ZS4NCg== ------=_001_NextPart346383486780_=---- Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BF
support.
 
Thanks,
Guangtao  Zhou
Senior Engineer 
Network Technology Research Institute of China=  Unicom
  
Date: 2015-04-15 01:11
To: pals@ietf.org
Subject: Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?
This is to start a two week WG = poll to determine whether
we should adopt
 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon-03
 
This poll will close on  29th April&= nbsp;2015
 
- Stewart

=E5=A6=82=E6=9E=9C=E6=82=A8=E9=94=99=E8=AF= =AF=E6=8E=A5=E6=94=B6=E4=BA=86=E8=AF=A5=E9=82=AE=E4=BB=B6=EF=BC=8C=E8=AF=B7= =E9=80=9A=E8=BF=87=E7=94=B5=E5=AD=90=E9=82=AE=E4=BB=B6=E7=AB=8B=E5=8D=B3=E9= =80=9A=E7=9F=A5=E6=88=91=E4=BB=AC=E3=80=82=E8=AF=B7=E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D=E9=82= =AE=E4=BB=B6=E5=88=B0hqs-spmc@chinaunicom.cn=EF=BC=8C=E5=8D=B3=E5=8F=AF=E4= =BB=A5=E9=80=80=E8=AE=A2=E6=AD=A4=E9=82=AE=E4=BB=B6=E3=80=82=E6=88=91=E4=BB= =AC=E5=B0=86=E7=AB=8B=E5=8D=B3=E5=B0=86=E6=82=A8=E7=9A=84=E4=BF=A1=E6=81=AF= =E4=BB=8E=E6=88=91=E4=BB=AC=E7=9A=84=E5=8F=91=E9=80=81=E7=9B=AE=E5=BD=95=E4= =B8=AD=E5=88=A0=E9=99=A4=E3=80=82 If you have received this email in error please notify us immediately by e-m= ail. Please reply to hqs-spmc@chinaunicom.cn if you want to unsubscribe from= this mail. We will immediately remove your information from our sending cat= alogue.

------=_001_NextPart346383486780_=------ From nobody Sat Apr 18 04:49:23 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B087A1A6F5D; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 04:49:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Il6yRqLGhyTf; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 04:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5CAC1A1EF9; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 04:49:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1180; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429357759; x=1430567359; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=7f6gAKg4q8PR7d9lkuQWtZaVdrnhk7gKgHKob2Bv+0E=; b=JXSZZdipAhm0DO/Tbyv8uSLwGZeNfeLr4pCyBvACR2izjz8eoWKnI9B6 TRB/MRouONNGQUPGLrmLNsdD5JbpRG3M1nN3ayiEudjRqH4W+lC+Jk7+w RCo37X7NsEmNfccLhI5/iD7z8bOumQbCIVeCaZSoER/MsQVDMa8q3mGhi 4=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ByBABFRDJV/5FdJa1dgwxSXAXFQ2YJgU+GAwKBODgUAQEBAQEBAX2EIAEBAQQ6PwwEAgEIEQQBAQsUCQchERQJCAEBBAENBQiIDwMRDcF9DYU7AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEwSLKYJHgVIRASAxBwaDEYEWAQSRI4N8hFaCbIM6iXOGQiKCHoFVbwGBCjmBAAEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,599,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="142409607" Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Apr 2015 11:49:19 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com [173.36.12.82]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3IBnIlh020173 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 18 Apr 2015 11:49:19 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.5.170]) by xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com ([173.36.12.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 06:49:18 -0500 From: "Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)" To: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" , "pals@ietf.org" , "l2tpext@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Requesting comments on SBFD-VCCV drafts Thread-Index: AdBcG8bbDt4lFsaSQwiuvYh/1U3PNAdqn65w Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 11:49:17 +0000 Message-ID: <315041E4211CB84E86EF7C25A2AB583D543E79BF@xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com> References: <315041E4211CB84E86EF7C25A2AB583D54337F7C@xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <315041E4211CB84E86EF7C25A2AB583D54337F7C@xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.65.56.217] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "Jeffrey Haas \(jhaas@pfrc.org\)" , "Carlos Pignataro \(cpignata\)" , "agmalis@gmail.com" , "nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com" , "Stewart Bryant \(stbryant\)" Subject: Re: [Pals] Requesting comments on SBFD-VCCV drafts X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 11:49:21 -0000 Hello all, Including the L2TP list for comments from them on the two drafts describe= d in the email below. A gentle reminder to the pals and bfd WG lists. Pleas= e note that some discussion when these drafts were presented at PALS and BF= D WG at Dallas (IETF-92).=20 Thanks Prasad -----Original Message----- From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Vengada Prasad Govin= dan (venggovi) Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:23 PM To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org; pals@ietf.org Cc: Jeffrey Haas (jhaas@pfrc.org); Carlos Pignataro (cpign= ata); agmalis@gmail.com; nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com; Stewart Bryant (stbryant= ) Subject: [Pals] Requesting comments on SBFD-VCCV drafts Hello all, We have submitted two new drafts: a. draft-gp-pals-seamless-vccv: This draft defines the SBFD protocol operat= ion for VCCV. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gp-pals-seamless-vccv/ b. draft-gp-l2tpext-sbfd-discriminator: This draft defines AVPs for adverti= sement of SBFD discriminators in L2TP. We welcome comments/ feedback on these drafts. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gp-l2tpext-sbfd-discriminator/ Thanks Prasad From nobody Sun Apr 19 01:14:46 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0061B2A5E; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 01:14:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r-wUVHEC4qnR; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 01:14:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AECEC1B2A67; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 01:14:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2261; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429431280; x=1430640880; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=7IIYKeQEBV0Hn23jIPCA6agwXu43SBhJDwZtCuEE7kM=; b=ibl+Sas+Z/haE8Q7GbAsZFOvZ/zOI7Eo/4CwvU8Cj7/cqMq3M1rjnpO9 FAK2foEmWAfxU58cJ9oSEV92zBAKKDE7HnC06AyN9g9i4n42FgAeifenn 6BlPs14afyFCMqEBFGsgTonJIA0/n5nY1lyBtkd5nkwEa4IIPyBje/Us0 s=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DoBQCvYjNV/4UNJK1cgwxSXAXFT4I+hX8CAgKBI0wBAQEBAQF+hCABAQEEOj8MBAIBCBEEAQELFAkHIREUCQgBAQQBDQUIiA8DEQ3CWw2FOwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARMEizeCTYIGMQcGgxGBFgEEkSuDfIRXgm2DPIoAgnmDTiKCHoFVbwGBQ4EAAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,602,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="412946823" Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Apr 2015 08:14:39 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com [173.36.12.81]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3J8EdVx014198 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 19 Apr 2015 08:14:39 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.5.170]) by xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com ([173.36.12.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 03:14:39 -0500 From: "Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)" To: Jiangyuanlong , "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" , "pals@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Requesting comments on SBFD-VCCV drafts Thread-Index: AdBcG8bbDt4lFsaSQwiuvYh/1U3PNAKKHR4wBQ0YfaA= Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 08:14:39 +0000 Message-ID: <315041E4211CB84E86EF7C25A2AB583D543E7C38@xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com> References: <315041E4211CB84E86EF7C25A2AB583D54337F7C@xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com> <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A8C38BB@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A8C38BB@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.65.42.35] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "Jeffrey Haas \(jhaas@pfrc.org\)" , "Carlos Pignataro \(cpignata\)" , "agmalis@gmail.com" , "nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com" , "Stewart Bryant \(stbryant\)" Subject: Re: [Pals] Requesting comments on SBFD-VCCV drafts X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 08:14:43 -0000 Hello Yuanlong, The intent of these drafts is not to deprecate BFD with SBFD but make them = co-existent. A guideline section will be included in the next revision as y= ou suggest. Thanks for your suggestion and apologies for the delay in the r= eply. Thanks to Andy Malis for pointing out the same. Thanks Prasad -----Original Message----- From: Jiangyuanlong [mailto:jiangyuanlong@huawei.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 11:50 PM To: Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi); rtg-bfd@ietf.org; pals@ietf.org Cc: Jeffrey Haas (jhaas@pfrc.org); Carlos Pignataro (cpign= ata); agmalis@gmail.com; nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com; Stewart Bryant (stbryant= ) Subject: RE: Requesting comments on SBFD-VCCV drafts Hi Stewart, Jeffrey and other authors, If the purpose of this draft is not to deprecate the original VCCV BFD (0x1= 0) function for MPLS PW, please make it clear: - One option is clearly removing MPLS/PW-ACH Encapsulation from SBFD so tha= t BFD and SBFD complement with each other. - Another option is as the document describes, the same MPLS/PW is supporte= d by both SBFD and original BFD, then a guideline section is needed so that= consistent BFD type (SBFD or original BFD) can be chosen by the peer PEs (= e.g., both BFD types are supported by two PEs associated with a specific BF= D session). Regards, Yuanlong -----Original Message----- From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Vengada Prasad Govin= dan (venggovi) Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 12:53 AM To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org; pals@ietf.org Cc: Jeffrey Haas (jhaas@pfrc.org); Carlos Pignataro (cpign= ata); agmalis@gmail.com; nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com; Stewart Bryant (stbryant= ) Subject: [Pals] Requesting comments on SBFD-VCCV drafts Hello all, We have submitted two new drafts: a. draft-gp-pals-seamless-vccv: This draft defines the SBFD protocol operat= ion for VCCV. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gp-pals-seamless-vccv/ b. draft-gp-l2tpext-sbfd-discriminator: This draft defines AVPs for adverti= sement of SBFD discriminators in L2TP. We welcome comments/ feedback on these drafts. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gp-l2tpext-sbfd-discriminator/ Thanks Prasad From nobody Tue Apr 21 06:59:10 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3227D1A903C; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 06:59:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xCe4Ni-UFHhj; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 06:58:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3DD1A6FF7; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 06:58:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.1.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150421135858.5112.36910.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 06:58:58 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: pals@ietf.org Subject: [Pals] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pals-vpls-pim-snooping-00.txt X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 13:59:00 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. Title : Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) over Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Authors : Olivier Dornon Jayant Kotalwar Venu Hemige Ray Qiu Filename : draft-ietf-pals-vpls-pim-snooping-00.txt Pages : 40 Date : 2015-04-21 Abstract: This document describes the procedures and recommendations for Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Provider Edges (PEs) to facilitate replication of multicast traffic to only certain ports (behind which there are interested Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) routers and/or Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) hosts) via Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) snooping and proxying. With PIM snooping, PEs passively listen to certain PIM control messages to build control and forwarding states while transparently flooding those messages. With PIM proxying, Provider Edges (PEs) do not flood PIM Join/Prune messages but only generate their own and send out of certain ports, based on the control states built from downstream Join/Prune messages. PIM proxying is required when PIM Join suppression is enabled on the Customer Equipment (CE) devices and useful to reduce PIM control traffic in a VPLS domain. The document also describes PIM relay, which can be viewed as light- weight proxying, where all downstream Join/Prune messages are simply forwarded out of certain ports but not flooded to avoid triggering PIM Join suppression on CE devices. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-vpls-pim-snooping/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pals-vpls-pim-snooping-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Tue Apr 21 14:20:03 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B0B1B2B85 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:20:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.51 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id whqO-_CovPy9 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:19:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41C941B2B82 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:19:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11669; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429651201; x=1430860801; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=dBnk1WJcKtHniA09qQ/BzLq2IE2oSnZWjyuurRQ35BQ=; b=CsKbgL3vvSoF7iZpmrbf4BdC6MqT+4X65vQQXrlm8W5dCjwAUuG/xsR6 eMFmRLnrJIrkslvzFtLo13u3mUoxXdmIVbpoEjHyfb9A6zGXHLhpLMJxF w9HquOuL0H9ZKNyeFGwFqJXOhfAJtuvaPYDCU98azlbAfb1l7RqUUGzZJ 8=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DmBAAGvjZV/4kNJK1bgkVHUlwFxWsqCYFFAQmGBAKBRjgUAQEBAQEBAX2EIAEBAQQBAQEqQQYFEAIBCBEDAQEBCx0HIQYLFAkIAgQBDQUIiA8DEQ3GSg2FMQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReLN4JNgVQQAgEfIA0EBgGDF4EWBY8TgiCEAYRagU+BITqDAooFhkoig3NvgUSBAAEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,618,1422921600"; d="scan'208,217";a="143305212" Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Apr 2015 21:20:00 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com [173.36.12.87]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3LLJwPx024189 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 21 Apr 2015 21:19:58 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x13.cisco.com ([169.254.3.100]) by xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com ([173.36.12.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:19:58 -0500 From: "Siva Sivabalan (msiva)" To: "Sami Boutros (sboutros)" , "Shah, Himanshu" , "pals@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pals] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 Thread-Index: AQHQdr8VghGWWI+CVUmkx7f+3v8rE51NBzoAgAAF84CACvdAcA== Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 21:19:57 +0000 Message-ID: References: , <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B87C3CCBF@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.86.244.129] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E2529AC6415F6B4197901F2B67212E9A2AF53AACxmbrcdx13ciscoc_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "Venkatesan, Mannan" , "Andrew G. Malis" , "draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 21:20:01 -0000 --_000_E2529AC6415F6B4197901F2B67212E9A2AF53AACxmbrcdx13ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am not aware of any IPR. Thanks, Siva From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sami Boutros (sboutr= os) Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 12:53 PM To: Shah, Himanshu Cc: Venkatesan, Mannan; Andrew G. Malis; draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@too= ls.ietf.org; pals@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pals] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 same here. Thanks, Sami On Apr 14, 2015, at 9:31 AM, Shah, Himanshu > wrote: I am not aware of any IPR. Himanshu ________________________________________ From: Venkatesan, Mannan [Mannan_Venkatesan@Cable.Comcast.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 10:27 AM To: Andrew G. Malis; pals@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pals-m= pls-tp-mac-wd@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 Andy, I am not aware of any IPR. Thanks, Mannan From: "Andrew G. Malis" > Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 8:43 AM To: "pals@ietf.org" >, "draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-= mac-wd@tools.ietf.org= " > Subject: IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 Resent-From: > Resent-To: > Resent-Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 8:44 AM This mail starts an IPR poll on http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pals-= mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 in preparation for WG last call. Authors and contributors, are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ie= tf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the PALS WG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each contributor. If you are on the PALS WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We will close this poll on 4th April 2015 or later if we have not heard fr= om all authors/contributors by then. Thanks, Andy and Stewart _______________________________________________ Pals mailing list Pals@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals --_000_E2529AC6415F6B4197901F2B67212E9A2AF53AACxmbrcdx13ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am not aware of any IPR= .

 <= /p>

Thanks,=

Siva

 <= /p>

From: Pals [ma= ilto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sami Boutros (sboutros)
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 12:53 PM
To: Shah, Himanshu
Cc: Venkatesan, Mannan; Andrew G. Malis; draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac= -wd@tools.ietf.org; pals@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pals] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00

 

same here.

 

Thanks,

 

Sami

On Apr 14, 2015, at 9:31 AM, Shah, Himanshu <hshah@ciena.com> wrote:



I am not aware of an= y IPR.
Himanshu
________________________________________
From: Venkatesan, Mannan [Mannan_Venkatesan@Cable.Comcast.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 10:27 AM
To: Andrew G. Malis; pals@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00

Andy,
I am not aware of any IPR.

Thanks,
Mannan

From: "Andrew G. Malis" <= agmalis@gmail.com<mailto:agmali= s@gmail.com>>
Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 8:43 AM
To: "pals@ietf.org<mailto:pals@ietf.org>" <pals@ietf.org<ma= ilto:pals@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@tools.ietf.org<mail= to:draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@tools.ietf.org>" <draft= -ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd= @tools.ietf.org>>
Subject: IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00
Resent-From: <agmalis@gmail.com= <mailto:agmalis@gmail.com>&g= t;
Resent-To: <d= raft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd@ietf.or= g>>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 8:44 AM

This mail starts an IPR poll on http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 in prepara= tion for WG last call.

Authors and contributors, are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ie= tf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
IPR. The response needs to be sent to the PALS WG mailing list. The
document will not advance to the next stage until a response
has been received from each author and each contributor.

If you are on the PALS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

We will close this poll on 4th  April 2015 or later if we have not hea= rd from
all authors/contributors by then.

Thanks,
Andy and Stewart

_______________________________________________
Pals mailing list
Pals@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org= /mailman/listinfo/pals

 

--_000_E2529AC6415F6B4197901F2B67212E9A2AF53AACxmbrcdx13ciscoc_-- From nobody Tue Apr 21 14:52:10 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE09A1B2C38 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:52:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vHQWEnR8zBb8 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:52:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14A5B1A1B22 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:52:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wiax7 with SMTP id x7so116797473wia.0 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:52:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=HYAFWzPMsUBBpl1WAPF/zTE05qex4L6i4GCQ0LZKbAk=; b=PQmYStAe32G6PueMTBg1o7MpCe933K1JLVF/cwYncxsyP5oGE7sEbFtMpsjl7PiuB3 3P5ivrOfEXatQWi45InuTPbVujY8uMj+iNnZtBcMYEetCpoNjOKIUbPR8RVj8aSMIjO9 vAOQbY3EHNZ52w+eaUBAPFXMgDFvPUKS0QfdeSwRDUeMZ5n0FH49R4nG5O6EzFjyvNd1 3YVMpCZgZhFMbTFL5aYug9unzrT6LCMli291f8XiTV1X3NmXkc1JLaNHwMKAqQCaPAPD DHxTJRXkAeGhrJudaYu0Y2QRPJr3A7wBJlUpXE1LyTZ81B5B628IyQCQJ33KCxo2LwYd 9Idg== X-Received: by 10.180.78.65 with SMTP id z1mr264671wiw.14.1429653125882; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:52:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.182.215 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:51:45 -0700 (PDT) From: "Andrew G. Malis" Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 05:51:45 +0800 Message-ID: To: "pals@ietf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043be13cb8674b0514430e23 Archived-At: Subject: [Pals] PALS WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00 X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 21:52:08 -0000 --f46d043be13cb8674b0514430e23 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 This beings a two-week WG LC for http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00, to complete on May 6. Please send your comments on the draft to the PALS WG (just replying to this email would be best). Thanks, Andy --f46d043be13cb8674b0514430e23 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This beings a two-week WG LC for=C2=A0http://tools.ietf.org/= html/draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00, to complete on May 6. Please se= nd your comments on the draft to the PALS WG (just replying to this email w= ould be best).

Thanks,
Andy

--f46d043be13cb8674b0514430e23-- From nobody Tue Apr 21 15:18:44 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1FD11B2CBE for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 15:18:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RCVH1-epTZnL for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 15:18:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AE331B2CB6 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 15:18:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wicmx19 with SMTP id mx19so73573081wic.1 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 15:18:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=JcWbJXtNNTSA7YKLq1G1vuY9uYrgx308PLZO9+tkSD4=; b=w8inaxD3l4qW6Bctov5v5P8zwvvctMOoPlITlWT6acXPIbI3SBqyJHJsgeR/rsRvb1 /OGkZPC3CirkBPXs61Al9v+/KXO9vCf9AR2feMU0Wc/jaAVFApNDnDeknO1SBq/eXDCN quv0ouNWfLecfOockYwmf3GyYQSl0Ed5vi/ZUA8Y+Uy3i3RJOlMXDQuc7i1j01lBZPIX hR/gvixkB3byOzF+MRHMYoqxgU5F4yweI+cz9foT8XZOSiBjX8JK0JRbjBHCLLrhPfUc +Cjwxfn3Ib3b8hBnmewy1eO+8D5CKgvIFznENZwbsabZI9P5GWqiwzMXyuGhwxSYKBO7 mUUw== X-Received: by 10.180.219.42 with SMTP id pl10mr366395wic.70.1429654709976; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 15:18:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.182.215 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 15:18:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55367491.5090002@cisco.com> References: <55367450.6060006@cisco.com> <55367491.5090002@cisco.com> From: "Andrew G. Malis" Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 06:18:09 +0800 Message-ID: To: "pals@ietf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1135f99023c1e70514436d7a Archived-At: Subject: [Pals] Fwd: [Rtg-yang-coord] Fwd: YANG Editing Session at IETF 93 X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 22:18:43 -0000 --001a1135f99023c1e70514436d7a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 FYI, in case you want to make travel plans to arrive in Prague in time for this session. Cheers, Andy -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: YANG Editing Session at IETF 93 Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:01:20 +0200 From: Benoit Claise To: NETMOD Working Group FYI.http://www.ietf.org/meeting/93/tutorials/yang-session.html Regards, Benoit --001a1135f99023c1e70514436d7a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
FYI, in case you want to make travel plans to arrive in Pr= ague in time for this session.

Cheers,
Andy

-------- Forwarded Message --------
=C2=A0
Subject: YANG Editing Session at IETF 93
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:01:20 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org> 
FYI.
http://www.ietf.org/meeting/93/tutorials/yang-session.html

Regards, Benoit

--001a1135f99023c1e70514436d7a-- From nobody Wed Apr 22 01:26:30 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D97A1B2D9A for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 01:26:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xB_VQbhfHcOW for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 01:26:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 413311B2DA3 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 01:26:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BVD64514; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:26:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.71) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 09:26:06 +0100 Received: from SZXEMA506-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.68]) by SZXEMA412-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.71]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 16:25:58 +0800 From: Jiangyuanlong To: "stbryant@cisco.com" , "pals@ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org" , Matthew Bocci , pals-ads , "Wanghaibo (Rainsword)" Thread-Topic: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe Thread-Index: AQHQdtM2mHLylKiE2UmdPkibHQ7T6p1Ytibw Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:25:58 +0000 Message-ID: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A8C9F25@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> References: <20150127144432.4057.11091.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <552D456B.8050205@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <552D456B.8050205@cisco.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.66.76.118] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:26:28 -0000 Support.=20 In the review, I came across a minor issue in Section 4, which says:"If VCC= V CC type 3 "TTL Expiry" is to be used, the hop count from one T-PE to the remote T-PE needs to be obtained in advance. This can be achieved either by control plane SP-PE TLVs or through data plane tracing of the MS-PW." But the document also says PW-Seg1 can be statically configured.=20 In that case, provisioning it in the management plane may be more preferabl= e. The authors may consider it together with other inputs after the last call. Thanks, Yuanlong -----Original Message----- From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:51 AM To: pals@ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-s= pe@tools.ietf.org; Matthew Bocci; pals-ads; Wanghaibo (Rainsword) Subject: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe This email starts the WG last call on draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe This document can be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe/ Last call will close on 29th April 2015 - Stewart _______________________________________________ Pals mailing list Pals@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals From nobody Wed Apr 22 07:29:20 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56B81AC3BE for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 07:29:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 284FVvqvcPx3 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 07:29:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF6F91AC3C2 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 07:29:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BVE06656; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 14:29:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from DFWEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.72) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:29:10 +0100 Received: from DFWEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.50]) by dfweml702-chm ([10.193.5.72]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 07:29:07 -0700 From: Lucy yong To: "stbryant@cisco.com" , "pals@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? Thread-Index: AQHQdtYmKQq0QkFfXUG+ETDHKJ/fWJ1ZJGSA Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 14:29:07 +0000 Message-ID: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D57162446@dfweml701-chm> References: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.47.144.137] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Cc: "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 14:29:18 -0000 Support the adoption. Lucy -----Original Message----- From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 12:12 PM To: pals@ietf.org Cc: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org Subject: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? This is to start a two week WG poll to determine whether we should adopt https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon-03 This poll will close on 29th April 2015 - Stewart _______________________________________________ Pals mailing list Pals@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals From nobody Wed Apr 22 18:59:23 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB53A1A0069 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:59:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.311 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RELAY_IS_221=2.222, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8RM8ZMlJSh49 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:59:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cmccmta3.chinamobile.com (cmccmta3.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 78E501A005F for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:59:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.15]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app09-12009 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee9553851e90e3-e756a; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:59:06 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee9553851e90e3-e756a X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000 Received: from cmccPC (unknown[125.35.9.8]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr08-12008 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee8553851e94bc-99bd2; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:59:06 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee8553851e94bc-99bd2 From: "weiqiang cheng" To: , References: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:59:06 +0800 Message-ID: <00ef01d07d69$14c928f0$3e5b7ad0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AdB21iDaSNNCkwNyRKi7L6zykxta2QGku70A Content-Language: zh-cn Archived-At: Cc: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org, pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 01:59:22 -0000 Support. -----Original Message----- From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 1:12 AM To: pals@ietf.org Cc: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org Subject: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? This is to start a two week WG poll to determine whether we should adopt https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon-03 This poll will close on 29th April 2015 - Stewart _______________________________________________ Pals mailing list Pals@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals From nobody Wed Apr 22 23:48:00 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DCB31AC438; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 23:47:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ebyHMypmUbHg; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 23:47:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2311AD2DF; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 23:47:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.1.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150423064750.4176.26169.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 23:47:50 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: pals@ietf.org Subject: [Pals] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection-01.txt X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 06:47:58 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. Title : S-PE Outage Protection for Static Multi-Segment Pseudowires Authors : Andrew G. Malis Loa Andersson Huub van Helvoort Jongyoon Shin Lei Wang Alessandro D'Alessandro Filename : draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection-01.txt Pages : 8 Date : 2015-04-22 Abstract: In MPLS and MPLS-TP environments, statically provisioned Single- Segment Pseudowires (SS-PWs) are protected against tunnel failure via MPLS-level and MPLS-TP-level tunnel protection. With statically provisioned Multi-Segment Pseudowires (MS-PWs), each segment of the MS-PW is likewise protected from tunnel failures via MPLS-level and MPLS-TP-level tunnel protection. However, static MS-PWs are not protected end-to-end against failure of one of the switching PEs (S-PEs) along the path of the MS-PW. This document describes how to achieve this protection via redundant MS-PWs by updating the existing procedures in RFC 6870. It also contains an optional approach based on MPLS-TP Linear Protection. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection-01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Thu Apr 23 00:02:11 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33D01ACF58 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 00:02:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nDYxmSS0eNkx for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 00:02:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (mail-wg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 790A91B2E76 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 00:01:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wgen6 with SMTP id n6so8163501wge.3 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 00:01:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=pixpMwbShurRLU2ZQdhd3SCSFyDjZgNUxVJm+Fm0WhU=; b=JnlW3+VxU8Uzu2Fic1IV2YxpJeSEIfy7Mwmwv+nayS2Ih6/vxb8LCDNsz3gjrRpOYy cZYgokNa1rW01xvJAX9RYy6RS7kyuubv3xRcW/7EGcjZZPbKDEy4xN/iYEn8bkA2Dfg+ KlXfOC26If6ZcMbPqRp9j7DWzwSOshkXi1FiezFkHll8q7Abc8a8cD1vVToIYUmuVu09 LBqcMOwtdfcggrSc9pOBUvUvlgb6bJ5kDq4UDRhSLkGlkIpWzLTshn1oDP1qu/hVnssU 6SqXO3VP103+fHyKnlUvKqJvkkqlLwbs4IoVt3mZB0SvkJKyDS4+ToXnQdwSEkAweA/B q+aA== X-Received: by 10.194.175.70 with SMTP id by6mr2635275wjc.42.1429772518288; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 00:01:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.182.215 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 00:01:37 -0700 (PDT) From: "Andrew G. Malis" Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:01:37 +0800 Message-ID: To: Stewart Bryant Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d175a0ff35905145edb8e Archived-At: Cc: "pals@ietf.org" Subject: [Pals] Requesting PALS WG LC for draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection-01 X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 07:02:10 -0000 --089e013d175a0ff35905145edb8e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Stewart, draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection has been updated to reflect all comments received to date. The updates were in response to requests to clarify the text in several places, there were no substantive technical changes. The changes can be viewed at https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection-01.txt . The authors are in agreement that with these changes, the draft is now ready for WG LC. Thanks, Andy --089e013d175a0ff35905145edb8e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks,
Andy

--089e013d175a0ff35905145edb8e-- From nobody Thu Apr 23 01:36:14 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620BD1A8939 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 01:36:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I6l5-0H5wPo9 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 01:36:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D85A1A8923 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 01:36:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BVF26179; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 08:36:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.39) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:36:02 +0100 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.135]) by nkgeml408-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.39]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:35:52 +0800 From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" To: Jiangyuanlong , "stbryant@cisco.com" , "pals@ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org" , Matthew Bocci , pals-ads , "Wanghaibo (Rainsword)" Thread-Topic: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe Thread-Index: AQHQdtM8TkQ0ufcQ0Eum4LRqbewdBZ1YOCcAgAIEQgA= Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 08:35:51 +0000 Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D0A184@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <20150127144432.4057.11091.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <552D456B.8050205@cisco.com> <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A8C9F25@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A8C9F25@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.97.131] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 08:36:12 -0000 Hi Yuanlong,=20 Thanks for your comments.=20 If some PW segments are statically configured, I agree that for VCCV CC typ= e 3 some local policy may be needed to set the TTL properly. Besides, as said in section 4, MS-PW path trace may be used to obtain the i= nformation needed for MS-PW connectivity verification. The details are spec= ified in RFC 6073. Best regards, Jie > -----Original Message----- > From: Jiangyuanlong [mailto:jiangyuanlong@huawei.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 4:26 PM > To: stbryant@cisco.com; pals@ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org; > draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org; Matthew Bocci; pals-ads; > Wanghaibo (Rainsword) > Subject: RE: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe >=20 > Support. >=20 > In the review, I came across a minor issue in Section 4, which says:"If V= CCV CC > type 3 "TTL Expiry" is > to be used, the hop count from one T-PE to the remote T-PE needs to > be obtained in advance. This can be achieved either by control plane > SP-PE TLVs or through data plane tracing of the MS-PW." > But the document also says PW-Seg1 can be statically configured. > In that case, provisioning it in the management plane may be more prefera= ble. > The authors may consider it together with other inputs after the last cal= l. >=20 > Thanks, > Yuanlong >=20 >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant > Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:51 AM > To: pals@ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org; > draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org; Matthew Bocci; pals-ads; > Wanghaibo (Rainsword) > Subject: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe >=20 >=20 > This email starts the WG last call on draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe >=20 > This document can be found at >=20 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe/ >=20 > Last call will close on 29th April 2015 >=20 > - Stewart >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Pals mailing list > Pals@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals From nobody Thu Apr 23 19:32:04 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E301A007C for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:32:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OtyutiXYUBZk for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:32:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D03D1A008F for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:31:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by widdi4 with SMTP id di4so5083509wid.0 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:31:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=KxBUDQZF8rUcWGhv6rNo/9354YjnX4SkTs9wHtrRKHk=; b=kzjZO5Uujyf68QQrvz4ubVAc3a38p7DNdsJF8lXFXwZMSHXXLkGnAQ34FHsr1cPBcG SOeVo1soFYUyTSF1HQDymyTqLhV4WGa1/rV9IEqgGdTxRrkRh6KN3d0Y9zgLZCwaqnxT pHlQPdYbmBW1l5gmTawWL0N0brWjsPlYsC5HFYdsBiZrKa0ukvbA/fbvczM3uOMRkiEo 3xVNIm/WZaDaPhG5dh4RygkpxM3QBcIMmMh1BhZ0NqwI0arXtanf2wgJX7bzSRPvFYA2 3WWqj5exACj/CV1xDQLcVOM5YrL4EU1sk89U4T8dnzubcSPxcDyryRozKuUHGcL8TStP CtBw== X-Received: by 10.194.61.208 with SMTP id s16mr11314077wjr.135.1429842711403; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:31:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.182.215 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:31:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55394DD0.1050109@labn.net> References: <55394DD0.1050109@labn.net> From: "Andrew G. Malis" Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:31:31 +0800 Message-ID: To: "pals@ietf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b86d3e6e5e11d05146f3224 Archived-At: Cc: Lou Berger Subject: [Pals] Fwd: [Teas] New Wiki: Some informal guidance for standards track protocol specifications X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 02:32:03 -0000 --047d7b86d3e6e5e11d05146f3224 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 This is a very useful wiki page, please see Lou's introduction below. Thanks to Lou for putting this together. Cheers, Andy ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Lou Berger Date: Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:53 AM Subject: [Teas] New Wiki: Some informal guidance for standards track protocol specifications To: TEAS WG All, I thought it might be useful to document some topics that repeatedly get discussed during document reviews. I started an "informal" wiki on the topic. It is located at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/teas/trac/wiki/PSGuidelines . Please take a look at, comment/modify as you see fit. As chair, I ask that all WG authors review this guidance in anticipation of comment topics you're likely to see before/during WG LC. Thanks, Lou _______________________________________________ Teas mailing list Teas@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas --047d7b86d3e6e5e11d05146f3224 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This is a very useful wiki page, please see Lou's intr= oduction below. Thanks to Lou for putting this together.

Cheers,
Andy

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Date: Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:53 AM=
Subject: [Teas] New Wiki: Some informal guidance for standards track pr= otocol specifications
To: TEAS WG <t= eas@ietf.org>


All,
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 I thought it might be useful to document some topics that rep= eatedly
get discussed during document reviews.=C2=A0 I started an "informal&qu= ot; wiki on
the topic. It is located at
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/teas/trac/wiki/PSGuidelines = . Please take
a look at, comment/modify as you see fit.

As chair,

I ask that all WG authors review this guidance in anticipation of
comment topics you're likely to see before/during WG LC.

Thanks,
Lou



_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org
ht= tps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

--047d7b86d3e6e5e11d05146f3224-- From nobody Fri Apr 24 03:01:02 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EEE41A1B43 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 03:01:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZLcac5yhkSJi for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 03:00:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BB131A1B2B for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 03:00:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BRU10029; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:00:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.32) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:00:55 +0100 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.135]) by nkgeml401-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.32]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:00:47 +0800 From: Mingui Zhang To: "stbryant@cisco.com" , "pals@ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org" , Matthew Bocci , pals-ads , "Wanghaibo (Rainsword)" Thread-Topic: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe Thread-Index: AQHQdtORG4rc061vzEKXQYyBFHqR7p1b2ioQ Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:00:46 +0000 Message-ID: <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E76ABACD21@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <20150127144432.4057.11091.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <552D456B.8050205@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <552D456B.8050205@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.102.74] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:01:01 -0000 I have read the current version. Support. I have a bit concern: shall we replace the two "may" in Section 3 with "MAY= " or "SHOULD"? In the abstract: s/[RFC6870]/RFC 6870/ In the introduction: s/[RFC3985]applications/[RFC3985] applications/ Thanks, Mingui >-----Original Message----- >From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant >Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:51 AM >To: pals@ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org; >draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org; Matthew Bocci; pals-ads; >Wanghaibo (Rainsword) >Subject: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe > > >This email starts the WG last call on draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe > >This document can be found at > >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe/ > >Last call will close on 29th April 2015 > >- Stewart > >_______________________________________________ >Pals mailing list >Pals@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals From nobody Fri Apr 24 03:19:06 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808D11A7015 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 03:19:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MqD4pz8Lge1j for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 03:19:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F4A41A7018 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 03:19:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1606; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429870743; x=1431080343; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rupcKyu28t5ML4Qi5cSEYVlsmaK9GaPK5pPii6/Eiwg=; b=VoSgd5mlkrgayngzCVQqVwrYGHoiFrV19rFGNqI61BosFKpfnuLtMuIe sz5CciZmkcQlaV6ToNDiEnU8bwongp7KVkiffTkFz1NbEDgtxlcas0OX7 ocyakF0zMaa1SRPZnOra/Za6WjFgYiGOdm5HCRUGEWnkGfaQoaYf23dGg I=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,638,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="441805377" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2015 10:19:01 +0000 Received: from [10.55.98.182] (ams-stbryant-8815.cisco.com [10.55.98.182]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3OAJ1AL028594; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:19:01 GMT Message-ID: <553A1895.20608@cisco.com> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:19:01 +0100 From: Stewart Bryant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mingui Zhang , "pals@ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org" , Matthew Bocci , pals-ads , "Wanghaibo (Rainsword)" References: <20150127144432.4057.11091.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <552D456B.8050205@cisco.com> <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E76ABACD21@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E76ABACD21@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:19:05 -0000 The sentence is S-PE1 may advertise the updated SP-PE TLVs [RFC6073] using Label Mapping message to T-PE1. So what are we saying here? That S-PE1 has a number of ways of doing the advertisement of which RFC6073 is one way or That S-PE1 can choose whether of not it does the advertisement or Do we really mean MUST in some way? Stewart On 24/04/2015 11:00, Mingui Zhang wrote: > I have read the current version. Support. > > I have a bit concern: shall we replace the two "may" in Section 3 with "MAY" or "SHOULD"? > > In the abstract: s/[RFC6870]/RFC 6870/ > In the introduction: s/[RFC3985]applications/[RFC3985] applications/ > > Thanks, > Mingui > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant >> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:51 AM >> To: pals@ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org; >> draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org; Matthew Bocci; pals-ads; >> Wanghaibo (Rainsword) >> Subject: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe >> >> >> This email starts the WG last call on draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe >> >> This document can be found at >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe/ >> >> Last call will close on 29th April 2015 >> >> - Stewart >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pals mailing list >> Pals@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals > . > -- For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From nobody Sun Apr 26 20:24:18 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563731AD0B3 for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 20:24:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pTxiD13MRy-k for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 20:24:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08C5D1AD09C for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 20:24:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BVJ03629; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 03:24:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nkgeml407-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.38) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 04:24:09 +0100 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.135]) by nkgeml407-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:24:00 +0800 From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" To: "stbryant@cisco.com" , Mingui Zhang , "pals@ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org" , Matthew Bocci , pals-ads , "Wanghaibo (Rainsword)" Thread-Topic: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe Thread-Index: AQHQdtM8TkQ0ufcQ0Eum4LRqbewdBZ1cA0+tgAQ6pjA= Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 03:24:00 +0000 Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D0AB77@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <20150127144432.4057.11091.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <552D456B.8050205@cisco.com> <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E76ABACD21@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <553A1895.20608@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <553A1895.20608@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.97.131] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 03:24:17 -0000 Hi Stewart,=20 Thanks a lot for your comments. I agree that here "may" is a little confusi= ng.=20 It intends to mean "MUST" when the S-PE supports the SP-PE TLV processing. = The reason we used "MAY" was considering S-PEs which do not support SP-PE T= LVs operation. I think we can rephrase it with "SHOULD" or "MUST". Which on= e do you prefer? Best regards, Jie > -----Original Message----- > From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stbryant@cisco.com] > Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 6:19 PM > To: Mingui Zhang; pals@ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org; > draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org; Matthew Bocci; pals-ads; > Wanghaibo (Rainsword) > Subject: Re: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe >=20 > The sentence is >=20 > S-PE1 may > advertise the updated SP-PE TLVs [RFC6073] using Label Mapping > message to T-PE1. >=20 > So what are we saying here? >=20 > That S-PE1 has a number of ways of doing the advertisement of which RFC60= 73 > is one way >=20 > or >=20 > That S-PE1 can choose whether of not it does the advertisement >=20 > or >=20 > Do we really mean MUST in some way? >=20 > Stewart >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 24/04/2015 11:00, Mingui Zhang wrote: > > I have read the current version. Support. > > > > I have a bit concern: shall we replace the two "may" in Section 3 with = "MAY" > or "SHOULD"? > > > > In the abstract: s/[RFC6870]/RFC 6870/ In the introduction: > > s/[RFC3985]applications/[RFC3985] applications/ > > > > Thanks, > > Mingui > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:51 AM > >> To: pals@ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org; > >> draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org; Matthew Bocci; > >> pals-ads; Wanghaibo (Rainsword) > >> Subject: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe > >> > >> > >> This email starts the WG last call on draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe > >> > >> This document can be found at > >> > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe/ > >> > >> Last call will close on 29th April 2015 > >> > >> - Stewart > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Pals mailing list > >> Pals@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals > > . > > >=20 >=20 > -- > For corporate legal information go to: >=20 > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From nobody Mon Apr 27 02:18:46 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4701B2F74 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 02:18:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KVzSYiCIJkYK for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 02:18:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F58A1B2F75 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 02:18:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BVJ41263; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 09:18:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.34) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:18:26 +0100 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.135]) by nkgeml403-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.34]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:18:17 +0800 From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" To: Mingui Zhang , "stbryant@cisco.com" , "pals@ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org" , Matthew Bocci , pals-ads , "Wanghaibo (Rainsword)" Thread-Topic: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe Thread-Index: AQHQdtM8TkQ0ufcQ0Eum4LRqbewdBZ1bd04AgAUvoLA= Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 09:18:17 +0000 Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D0ACDD@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <20150127144432.4057.11091.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <552D456B.8050205@cisco.com> <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E76ABACD21@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E76ABACD21@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.97.131] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 09:18:45 -0000 Hi Mingui,=20 Thanks for your comments.=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Mingui Zhang [mailto:zhangmingui@huawei.com] > Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 6:01 PM > To: stbryant@cisco.com; pals@ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org; > draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org; Matthew Bocci; pals-ads; > Wanghaibo (Rainsword) > Subject: RE: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe >=20 > I have read the current version. Support. >=20 > I have a bit concern: shall we replace the two "may" in Section 3 with "M= AY" or > "SHOULD"? We also received some comments offline of changing the "may", or "SHOULD" i= n this document to "MUST". We will revise the draft according to your comme= nts and use appropriate Requirements Language. > In the abstract: s/[RFC6870]/RFC 6870/ > In the introduction: s/[RFC3985]applications/[RFC3985] applications/ Will fix in the new revision. Thanks. Best regards, Jie >=20 > Thanks, > Mingui >=20 > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant > >Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:51 AM > >To: pals@ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org; > >draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org; Matthew Bocci; pals-ads; > >Wanghaibo (Rainsword) > >Subject: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe > > > > > >This email starts the WG last call on draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe > > > >This document can be found at > > > >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe/ > > > >Last call will close on 29th April 2015 > > > >- Stewart > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Pals mailing list > >Pals@ietf.org > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals From nobody Mon Apr 27 03:58:47 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2F71B3071 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 03:58:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jRgjAbsvqACG for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 03:58:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60E441B3070 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 03:58:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3000; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1430132324; x=1431341924; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AkUJu4v+k/PC8qIH47A0Ruqo6JrfSpc12RyZ6dMbcwY=; b=EyxFrclJkdoMiUhwpYXymHHzPgHAab5lLeBQlLYx7JFjjzSqzitoWxH1 gCWeDo/1k7GT0vAOcfl/BYnqZl+O7Rx8HJY4ELB0meQ6iBJg3Xecoa0b7 heGSy3wJzwjZDZ8kE8Xtfvvse2evyH2C74VY9kOcJ7+P78gY9DIlM3klx I=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,656,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="447000870" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Apr 2015 10:58:42 +0000 Received: from [64.103.106.132] (dhcp-bdlk10-data-vlan300-64-103-106-132.cisco.com [64.103.106.132]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3RAwghf008091; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:58:42 GMT Message-ID: <553E1662.5050205@cisco.com> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:58:42 +0100 From: Stewart Bryant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" , Mingui Zhang , "pals@ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org" , Matthew Bocci , pals-ads , "Wanghaibo (Rainsword)" References: <20150127144432.4057.11091.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <552D456B.8050205@cisco.com> <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E76ABACD21@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <553A1895.20608@cisco.com> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D0AB77@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D0AB77@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:58:46 -0000 Without looking at the context I would say something like: Jie Without looking at the original text to refine the sentence, I would probably say something like: If S-PE1 supports the SP-PE TLV processing, it SHOULD advertise the updated SP-PE TLVs [RFC6073] by sending a Label Mapping message to T-PE1. - Stewart On 27/04/2015 04:24, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: > Hi Stewart, > > Thanks a lot for your comments. I agree that here "may" is a little confusing. > > It intends to mean "MUST" when the S-PE supports the SP-PE TLV processing. The reason we used "MAY" was considering S-PEs which do not support SP-PE TLVs operation. I think we can rephrase it with "SHOULD" or "MUST". Which one do you prefer? > > Best regards, > Jie > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stbryant@cisco.com] >> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 6:19 PM >> To: Mingui Zhang; pals@ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org; >> draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org; Matthew Bocci; pals-ads; >> Wanghaibo (Rainsword) >> Subject: Re: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe >> >> The sentence is >> >> S-PE1 may >> advertise the updated SP-PE TLVs [RFC6073] using Label Mapping >> message to T-PE1. >> >> So what are we saying here? >> >> That S-PE1 has a number of ways of doing the advertisement of which RFC6073 >> is one way >> >> or >> >> That S-PE1 can choose whether of not it does the advertisement >> >> or >> >> Do we really mean MUST in some way? >> >> Stewart >> >> >> >> On 24/04/2015 11:00, Mingui Zhang wrote: >>> I have read the current version. Support. >>> >>> I have a bit concern: shall we replace the two "may" in Section 3 with "MAY" >> or "SHOULD"? >>> In the abstract: s/[RFC6870]/RFC 6870/ In the introduction: >>> s/[RFC3985]applications/[RFC3985] applications/ >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Mingui >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant >>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:51 AM >>>> To: pals@ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org; >>>> draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org; Matthew Bocci; >>>> pals-ads; Wanghaibo (Rainsword) >>>> Subject: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe >>>> >>>> >>>> This email starts the WG last call on draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe >>>> >>>> This document can be found at >>>> >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe/ >>>> >>>> Last call will close on 29th April 2015 >>>> >>>> - Stewart >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pals mailing list >>>> Pals@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals >>> . >>> >> >> -- >> For corporate legal information go to: >> >> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html > . > -- For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From nobody Mon Apr 27 06:05:31 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA461B3173 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 06:05:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HkhM1YZfLnk3 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 06:05:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0115.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2226F1B3179 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 06:05:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BY2PR0501MB1815.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.163.155.145) by BY2PR0501MB1814.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.163.155.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.148.16; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:05:18 +0000 Received: from BY2PR0501MB1813.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.163.155.143) by BY2PR0501MB1815.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.163.155.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.148.16; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:05:16 +0000 Received: from BY2PR0501MB1813.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.163.155.143]) by BY2PR0501MB1813.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.163.155.143]) with mapi id 15.01.0148.008; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:05:16 +0000 From: Yimin Shen To: "stbryant@cisco.com" , "pals@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? Thread-Index: AQHQdtYi/SpmLzsk3UqFUT6Rlx+1SJ1g56Ew Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:05:16 +0000 Message-ID: References: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: cisco.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14] x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR0501MB1815; UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR0501MB1814; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-forefront-antispam-report: BMV:1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(13464003)(377454003)(164054003)(46102003)(62966003)(54356999)(50986999)(2900100001)(19580405001)(106116001)(74316001)(230783001)(76576001)(99286002)(2950100001)(40100003)(102836002)(5001770100001)(76176999)(77156002)(15975445007)(122556002)(86362001)(2501003)(92566002)(66066001)(87936001)(19580395003)(2656002)(33656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR0501MB1815; H:BY2PR0501MB1813.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(5002010)(3002001); SRVR:BY2PR0501MB1815; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR0501MB1815; x-forefront-prvs: 0559FB9674 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Apr 2015 13:05:16.5475 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR0501MB1815 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net Archived-At: Cc: "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:05:29 -0000 Support the adoption, as a co-auther. Thanks, /Yimin Shen -----Original Message----- From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 1:12 PM To: pals@ietf.org Cc: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org Subject: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon? This is to start a two week WG poll to determine whether we should adopt https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon-03 This poll will close on 29th April 2015 - Stewart _______________________________________________ Pals mailing list Pals@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals From nobody Mon Apr 27 23:09:16 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00FFE1A00F5 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 23:09:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d8Ju3r0BgNqF for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 23:09:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42AD51A00CF for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 23:09:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BRX19263; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 06:09:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.39) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 07:09:08 +0100 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.135]) by nkgeml408-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.39]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:08:56 +0800 From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" To: "stbryant@cisco.com" , Mingui Zhang , "pals@ietf.org" , "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org" , Matthew Bocci , pals-ads , "Wanghaibo (Rainsword)" Thread-Topic: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe Thread-Index: AQHQdtM8TkQ0ufcQ0Eum4LRqbewdBZ1cA0+tgAQ6pjCAAACHAIABxUKQ Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 06:08:56 +0000 Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D0B114@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <20150127144432.4057.11091.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <552D456B.8050205@cisco.com> <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E76ABACD21@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <553A1895.20608@cisco.com> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D0AB77@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <553E1662.5050205@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <553E1662.5050205@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.97.131] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 06:09:15 -0000 Hi Stewart,=20 Thanks a lot for your suggestion.=20 We will update the sentence accordingly in next revision. Best regards, Jie > -----Original Message----- > From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stbryant@cisco.com] > Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 6:59 PM > To: Dongjie (Jimmy); Mingui Zhang; pals@ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.= org; > draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org; Matthew Bocci; pals-ads; > Wanghaibo (Rainsword) > Subject: Re: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe >=20 > Without looking at the context I would say something like: >=20 > Jie >=20 > Without looking at the original text to refine the sentence, I would prob= ably say > something like: >=20 > If S-PE1 supports the SP-PE TLV processing, it SHOULD advertise the updat= ed > SP-PE TLVs [RFC6073] by sending a Label Mapping message to T-PE1. >=20 > - Stewart >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 27/04/2015 04:24, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: > > Hi Stewart, > > > > Thanks a lot for your comments. I agree that here "may" is a little con= fusing. > > > > It intends to mean "MUST" when the S-PE supports the SP-PE TLV processi= ng. > The reason we used "MAY" was considering S-PEs which do not support SP-PE > TLVs operation. I think we can rephrase it with "SHOULD" or "MUST". Which > one do you prefer? > > > > Best regards, > > Jie > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stbryant@cisco.com] > >> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 6:19 PM > >> To: Mingui Zhang; pals@ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org; > >> draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org; Matthew Bocci; > >> pals-ads; Wanghaibo (Rainsword) > >> Subject: Re: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe > >> > >> The sentence is > >> > >> S-PE1 may > >> advertise the updated SP-PE TLVs [RFC6073] using Label Mapping > >> message to T-PE1. > >> > >> So what are we saying here? > >> > >> That S-PE1 has a number of ways of doing the advertisement of which > >> RFC6073 is one way > >> > >> or > >> > >> That S-PE1 can choose whether of not it does the advertisement > >> > >> or > >> > >> Do we really mean MUST in some way? > >> > >> Stewart > >> > >> > >> > >> On 24/04/2015 11:00, Mingui Zhang wrote: > >>> I have read the current version. Support. > >>> > >>> I have a bit concern: shall we replace the two "may" in Section 3 wit= h > "MAY" > >> or "SHOULD"? > >>> In the abstract: s/[RFC6870]/RFC 6870/ In the introduction: > >>> s/[RFC3985]applications/[RFC3985] applications/ > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Mingui > >>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart > >>>> Bryant > >>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:51 AM > >>>> To: pals@ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org; > >>>> draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe@tools.ietf.org; Matthew Bocci; > >>>> pals-ads; Wanghaibo (Rainsword) > >>>> Subject: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> This email starts the WG last call on > >>>> draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe > >>>> > >>>> This document can be found at > >>>> > >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe/ > >>>> > >>>> Last call will close on 29th April 2015 > >>>> > >>>> - Stewart > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Pals mailing list > >>>> Pals@ietf.org > >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals > >>> . > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> For corporate legal information go to: > >> > >> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html > > . > > >=20 >=20 > -- > For corporate legal information go to: >=20 > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From nobody Tue Apr 28 11:07:16 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208D11A8A79 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:07:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.51 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EbofLv8lXwpZ for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:07:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C32C1A8BBF for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:07:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2443; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1430244423; x=1431454023; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=7itnn5g7IqhCGhgqYhCG1galFFk2bUPp4NCijVREQeg=; b=Tvr3w0OmvrL2O/RsG3BJyjGRt6Fayc6z/Jk9VCv/t9YY2hpyMhN/Niv+ J5f1zXnp4El26pzO7UY7GE/MJMBkshpX86JApzra36kFFfySkzAlQn9mB kEdb+2yMMXP9nEoA3GTxp0+ARjdzDH+eREfOO73m9WxD7AUrSIQcIKDQz M=; X-Files: Attached Message Part : 124 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,665,1422921600"; d="scan'208,217";a="448693909" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Apr 2015 18:07:01 +0000 Received: from [64.103.106.132] (dhcp-bdlk10-data-vlan300-64-103-106-132.cisco.com [64.103.106.132]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3SI6xYB003026; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:07:00 GMT Message-ID: <553FCC44.4030205@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:07:00 +0100 From: Stewart Bryant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "pals@ietf.org" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080507010504080909020005" Archived-At: Cc: draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection@tools.ietf.org Subject: [Pals] IPR review of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:07:14 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080507010504080909020005 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070106080207020603040101" --------------070106080207020603040101 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The authors of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection have requested that I make a WG last call on this draft. However following established practice I first need to determine whether there is any undisclosed IPR on this draft. Authors, please reply to this message including the PALS WG in the CC list indicating whether or not you know of any not yet disclosed IPR that is applicable. WG if you know of any IPR that is relevant please disclose it. This poll will end 12 May 2015, or when I have heard from all authors, which ever is later. Thanks Stewart --------------070106080207020603040101 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The authors of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection have requested
that I make a WG last call on this draft. However following
established practice I first need to determine whether there
is any undisclosed IPR on this draft.

Authors, please reply to this message including the PALS WG
in the CC list indicating whether or not you know of any
not yet disclosed IPR that is applicable.

WG if you know of any IPR that is relevant please disclose it.

This poll will end 12 May 2015, or when I have heard from all
authors, which ever is later.

Thanks

Stewart


--------------070106080207020603040101-- --------------080507010504080909020005 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; name="Attached Message Part" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Attached Message Part" _______________________________________________ Pals mailing list Pals@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals --------------080507010504080909020005-- From nobody Tue Apr 28 11:14:02 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9BD11B2BCB for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:14:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AoP8WHCf7PCw for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:13:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D80A1B2BC9 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:13:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=537; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1430244836; x=1431454436; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lK6ccGUyjIxDTel3vvf2ZeLXXmwoYTv2UQoVbO19MgA=; b=GZHX1MjTAy5u9H2/zxvLxvu+x21+jriZmy/yfNdmqY8ZshUu8gF5tPDu UBnY5YVL1QZmxrZmp73pZYsNsIxpubXtI72lXMcekcD0KDmhOoEFtv9IA YZwm3pv53W4J1baiMKHfPz/Z4UqoBwKQhOBy1FvDNvHs0HT2bdwdxHxOt k=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,665,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="449099647" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Apr 2015 18:13:54 +0000 Received: from [64.103.106.132] (dhcp-bdlk10-data-vlan300-64-103-106-132.cisco.com [64.103.106.132]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3SIDrK5019852; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:13:53 GMT Message-ID: <553FCDE1.5010305@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:13:53 +0100 From: Stewart Bryant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection@tools.ietf.org, "pals@ietf.org" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: "pals@ietf.org" Subject: [Pals] Some comments on draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection-01.txt X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:14:00 -0000 I have some comments on draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection 1) I am not sure whether this is standards track or not. I does not really specify a new protocol, it just describes how you would use an existing protocol in a new environment. It seems to me that this should either be an informational or perhaps an applicability statement. 2) If this were ST, then I think it would be useful to clarify that Appendix 1 is not normative. 3) I count six authors, hopefully you can justify this to the IESG if asked. - Stewart From nobody Tue Apr 28 12:54:49 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9700F1A875A for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:54:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3i3JdqcH3hY7 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:54:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x230.google.com (mail-wg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ED561A8746 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:54:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wgso17 with SMTP id o17so6104001wgs.1 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:54:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=tOIwl1VgAZ01sHU/f/rrptGw1YkGf2K3vnE/ibpNPM4=; b=u+JWsjFDlMyvG2SxKKzXfYpP6dNVZA/sMcVvwkT36wH/9YvoxJPkgJaNFqoKFTbbfr MhtomcFUX7fpBvSdtK/gSidZ92eD8WSY0vbuY/ZhRcaU64za1qFpxaO6a6P/pXWOffQF 2t7dRkzsigHXTgTe/fZyr9tE/mYqBkoe5q+cJpCVbvJo8k2PgKGCfzyogDSTkpFevHgy r8Rzlj6CTVa/+NDhaPLlhcG5A6++tzayTpGGdnC5nLpOeokpHYfKf6G3PPgW9YQwkK8F 68wehKXy+ZaM3zowAas0+B/aXtM4/Zc5+Phu9Wd2LONECOMjzmC/I4GB/69byZ5iJ/3B wxSA== X-Received: by 10.194.11.73 with SMTP id o9mr36053451wjb.116.1430250886003; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:54:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.182.215 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:54:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <553FCC44.4030205@cisco.com> References: <553FCC44.4030205@cisco.com> From: "Andrew G. Malis" Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 15:54:25 -0400 Message-ID: To: Stewart Bryant Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b4507e00003410514ce3c0f Archived-At: Cc: draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection@tools.ietf.org, "pals@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] IPR review of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:54:48 -0000 --047d7b4507e00003410514ce3c0f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Stewart, I am not aware of any IPR regarding this draft. Thanks, Andy On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Stewart Bryant wrote: > The authors of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection have requested > that I make a WG last call on this draft. However following > established practice I first need to determine whether there > is any undisclosed IPR on this draft. > > Authors, please reply to this message including the PALS WG > in the CC list indicating whether or not you know of any > not yet disclosed IPR that is applicable. > > WG if you know of any IPR that is relevant please disclose it. > > This poll will end 12 May 2015, or when I have heard from all > authors, which ever is later. > > Thanks > > Stewart > > > --047d7b4507e00003410514ce3c0f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stewart,

I am not aware of any IPR rega= rding this draft.

Thanks,
Andy

On Tue, Apr 28,= 2015 at 2:07 PM, Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> wrote= :
=20 =20 =20
The authors of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection have requested
that I make a WG last call on this draft. However following
established practice I first need to determine whether there
is any undisclosed IPR on this draft.

Authors, please reply to this message including the PALS WG
in the CC list indicating whether or not you know of any
not yet disclosed IPR that is applicable.

WG if you know of any IPR that is relevant please disclose it.

This poll will end 12 May 2015, or when I have heard from all
authors, which ever is later.

Thanks

Stewart


=20

--047d7b4507e00003410514ce3c0f-- From nobody Tue Apr 28 13:10:22 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BFA1A8763 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:10:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k5X_XgKW0s44 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:10:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x22e.google.com (mail-wg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C497F1A701C for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:10:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wgso17 with SMTP id o17so6526911wgs.1 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:10:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=yJEMZm9O1PWnRwqPbuulreMKWSQIztbyLhfMxALChFs=; b=0a3ilD7A4lWPBvQQSj+PfaXuHkt2zJi6CB5SBJPYsM8fkJpOZGwvEubakSTWWUBjTj MF08Lmgwa+qq4e+Kw4KqMTPrf16ntSnwHlVGKo51R2D7ej9IL3AhtTymcTAdVbeE/ER/ Idkzdhem76K7o8RByXo0MgBZr2CfKW0R/kjsNWqwieWlSoiFHSwsrW7QtaEcg7ltrnDl OSm76Ow2/mCt48Pz0/DlWPT5gF3zyfmW2TEvRyxLP05r9orN4gB6odyWSZavEWs2josK PFG23VyRrqJ/TH8hZRc575RdGmldB66cBZavrT+uPzu2P3GeJfYqnOSTsF5X2Z4kyi39 Hiyg== X-Received: by 10.181.11.227 with SMTP id el3mr33318599wid.87.1430251818599; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:10:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.182.215 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:09:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <553FCDE1.5010305@cisco.com> References: <553FCDE1.5010305@cisco.com> From: "Andrew G. Malis" Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 16:09:57 -0400 Message-ID: To: Stewart Bryant Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043be25e9649080514ce731f Archived-At: Cc: draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection@tools.ietf.org, "pals@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] Some comments on draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection-01.txt X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 20:10:21 -0000 --f46d043be25e9649080514ce731f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stewart, Thanks for your comments. 1) Regarding standards track, this was discussed during the WG adoption poll. At that time, Greg Mirsky wrote: Firstly, I support adoption of this document by the WG. Second, considering that the document doesn=E2=80=99t put forth any IANA re= quests, nor changes any earlier defined procedures but rather document applicability of the RFC 6478, would authors consider Informational track for this document? To which I replied: Thanks for your support, and yes we would, although we prefer standards track so that it would be marked as "Updates 6870" in the RFC database, so anyone implementing 6870 will also read it, and a reference added if there's ever a 6870-bis. This answer still holds, since it extends the applicability of RFC 6870, making it standards track insures that future readers of 6870 should also read it. I don't think that would be the case were it informational. We (the authors) are of course willing to further discuss this, we just want to make sure that it get the proper visibility to readers of 6870. 2) Appendix 1 is already clear that it is optional, it's right in the title as well as the final paragraph of section A.1, and in the abstract at the top of the draft as well. However, let us know if you have any specific changes you would like to see in the text. 3) I'll poll the authors about this. Thanks again, Andy On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Stewart Bryant wrote: > I have some comments on draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection > > 1) I am not sure whether this is standards track or not. I does not > really specify a new protocol, it just describes how you would use > an existing protocol in a new environment. It seems to me that > this should either be an informational or perhaps an applicability > statement. > > 2) If this were ST, then I think it would be useful to clarify that > Appendix 1 is not normative. > > 3) I count six authors, hopefully you can justify this to the IESG > if asked. > > - Stewart > > _______________________________________________ > Pals mailing list > Pals@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals > --f46d043be25e9649080514ce731f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stewart,

Thanks for your comments.=C2= =A0

1) Regarding standards track, this was discuss= ed during the WG adoption poll. At that time, Greg Mirsky wrote:

<= div>
Firstly, I support adoption of this document by the WG.
Second, considering that the document doesn=E2=80=99t put forth = any IANA requests, nor changes any earlier defined procedures but rather do= cument applicability of the RFC 6478, would authors consider Informational = track for this document?

To whi= ch I replied:

Thanks for your s= upport, and yes we would, although we prefer standards track so that it wou= ld be marked as "Updates 6870" in the RFC database, so anyone imp= lementing 6870 will also read it, and a reference added if there's ever= a 6870-bis.

This answer still = holds, since it extends the applicability of RFC 6870, making it standards = track insures that future readers of 6870 should also read it. I don't = think that would be the case were it informational.

We (the authors) are of course willing to further discuss this, we just w= ant to make sure that it get the proper visibility to readers of 6870.

2) Appendix 1 is already clear that it is optional, it= 's right in the title as well as the final paragraph of section A.1, an= d in the abstract at the top of the draft as well. However, let us know if = you have any specific changes you would like to see in the text.
=
3) I'll poll the authors about this.

Thanks again,
Andy


On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:13 PM= , Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> wrote:
I have some comments on draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protectio= n

1) I am not sure whether this is standards track or not. I does not
really specify a new protocol, it just describes how you would use
an existing protocol in a new environment. It seems to me that
this should either be an informational or perhaps an applicability
statement.

2) If this were ST, then I think it would be useful to clarify that
Appendix 1 is not normative.

3) I count six authors,=C2=A0 hopefully you can justify this to the IESG if asked.

- Stewart

_______________________________________________
Pals mailing list
Pals@ietf.org
ht= tps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals

--f46d043be25e9649080514ce731f-- From nobody Tue Apr 28 17:59:18 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548A11A9129 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 17:59:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.062 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.062 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RELAY_IS_221=2.222, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z7ZB8os8U3fc for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 17:59:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta2.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 076511A9121 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 17:59:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.19]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app05-12005 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee555402cdd4ed-65a53; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 08:59:09 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee555402cdd4ed-65a53 X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000 Received: from icac (unknown[10.2.43.150]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr10-12010 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2eea55402cddee7-540c1; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 08:59:09 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2eea55402cddee7-540c1 From: "Wang Lei" To: , References: <553FCC44.4030205@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <553FCC44.4030205@cisco.com> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 08:59:11 +0800 Message-ID: <011d01d08217$b4810f40$1d832dc0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_011E_01D0825A.C2A44F40" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AdCB332ukYlTiqivQ7CCdwqANwpDUQANzjJQ Content-Language: zh-cn Archived-At: Cc: draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pals] IPR review of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:59:17 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_011E_01D0825A.C2A44F40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft.=20 Best Regards, =20 Lei Wang =20 =B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stbryant@cisco.com]=20 =B7=A2=CB=CD=CA=B1=BC=E4: 2015=C4=EA4=D4=C229=C8=D5 2:07 =CA=D5=BC=FE=C8=CB: pals@ietf.org =B3=AD=CB=CD: draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection@tools.ietf.org =D6=F7=CC=E2: IPR review of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection =20 The authors of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection have requested that I make a WG last call on this draft. However following established practice I first need to determine whether there is any undisclosed IPR on this draft. Authors, please reply to this message including the PALS WG in the CC list indicating whether or not you know of any not yet disclosed IPR that is applicable. WG if you know of any IPR that is relevant please disclose it. This poll will end 12 May 2015, or when I have heard from all authors, which ever is later. Thanks Stewart ------=_NextPart_000_011E_01D0825A.C2A44F40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am not aware of any IPR = related to this draft.

Best = Regards,

 

Lei Wang

 

=B7=A2= =BC=FE=C8=CB: = Stewart Bryant [mailto:stbryant@cisco.com]
=B7=A2= =CB=CD=CA=B1=BC=E4: = 2015=C4=EA= 4=D4=C229=C8=D5 2:07
=CA=D5=BC=FE=C8=CB: = pals@ietf.org
=B3=AD=CB=CD: = draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection@tools.ietf.org
=D6=F7=CC=E2= : IPR review of = draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection

=

 

The = authors of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection have requested
that I = make a WG last call on this draft. However following
established = practice I first need to determine whether there
is any undisclosed = IPR on this draft.

Authors, please reply to this message = including the PALS WG
in the CC list indicating whether or not you = know of any
not yet disclosed IPR that is applicable.

WG if = you know of any IPR that is relevant please disclose it.

This = poll will end 12 May 2015, or when I have heard from all
authors, = which ever is = later.

Thanks

Stewart

------=_NextPart_000_011E_01D0825A.C2A44F40-- From nobody Tue Apr 28 22:40:46 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D4E1ACD22 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 22:40:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RuImddCnmo8j for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 22:40:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD19E1ACD0C for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 22:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (81-236-221-144-no93.tbcn.telia.com [81.236.221.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 379A01801127; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 07:40:42 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <55406EDA.6000206@pi.nu> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 07:40:42 +0200 From: Loa Andersson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Andrew G. Malis" , Stewart Bryant References: <553FCC44.4030205@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection@tools.ietf.org, "pals@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] IPR review of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 05:40:45 -0000 Stewart, I'm not aware of any IPR that relates to this draft. /Loa On 2015-04-28 21:54, Andrew G. Malis wrote: > Stewart, > > I am not aware of any IPR regarding this draft. > > Thanks, > Andy > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Stewart Bryant > wrote: > > The authors of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection have requested > that I make a WG last call on this draft. However following > established practice I first need to determine whether there > is any undisclosed IPR on this draft. > > Authors, please reply to this message including the PALS WG > in the CC list indicating whether or not you know of any > not yet disclosed IPR that is applicable. > > WG if you know of any IPR that is relevant please disclose it. > > This poll will end 12 May 2015, or when I have heard from all > authors, which ever is later. > > Thanks > > Stewart > > > -- Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 From nobody Wed Apr 29 00:42:30 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5181B2A11 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:42:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f5zAE2fbT--g for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:42:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F5221B2A0B for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:42:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wgen6 with SMTP id n6so18593801wge.3 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:42:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:mime-version:content-type; bh=Xg/kokk3gK+INce08QNVBFjSZXAEbeYwYjS8nsRH72Q=; b=tTTu8o9AV1Y/LS3dkKhISwl+yN54oGa/SY2rThoa73XnMETVM+KRxySDO2evnkNyXR fEm2g7FRfIUM6CqF7988QWT0pwqPrYguhe9dv+iv2YyUIped/94AAAoqQMpFwGNj70Lu fkbBpK0bp2LMmsHQL+Bln6gad7bIoZhq9JFmn1YNT+KBNkdfsuamHFee/bItW0XkH2JS Adkh5csYXGmjizWlHAEmV8GdiFZPVCwYi1jprDQ/3HlMNk5PJjZK4ko/2T1Yol2Zmj2A VHSDdD6RVZbDXpJtgPmCslChENVR+wYYoJdns3tP5pNYLHQgmDtDn7S1QmxBWcf8SBDH hzwg== X-Received: by 10.180.218.201 with SMTP id pi9mr5411262wic.53.1430293345985; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:42:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.17.15] (g215085.upc-g.chello.nl. [80.57.215.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gi17sm37697185wjc.8.2015.04.29.00.42.24 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:42:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:42:26 +0200 Message-ID: From: Huub van Helvoort To: stbryant@cisco.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--_com.android.email_43197682657560" Archived-At: Cc: draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection@tools.ietf.org, pals@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pals] IPR review of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 07:42:29 -0000 ----_com.android.email_43197682657560 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 U3Rld2FydCwKCkknbSBub3QgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IElQUiB0aGF0IHJlbGF0ZXMgdG8gdGhpcyBk cmFmdC4KCkNoZWVycywgSHV1Yi4KClNlbnQgZnJvbSBIdWF3ZWkgTW9iaWxlCgpTdGV3YXJ0IEJy eWFudCA8c3RicnlhbnRAY2lzY28uY29tPiB3cm90ZToKCj5UaGUgYXV0aG9ycyBvZiBkcmFmdC1p ZXRmLXBhbHMtbXMtcHctcHJvdGVjdGlvbiBoYXZlIHJlcXVlc3RlZAo+dGhhdCBJIG1ha2UgYSBX RyBsYXN0IGNhbGwgb24gdGhpcyBkcmFmdC4gSG93ZXZlciBmb2xsb3dpbmcKPmVzdGFibGlzaGVk IHByYWN0aWNlIEkgZmlyc3QgbmVlZCB0byBkZXRlcm1pbmUgd2hldGhlciB0aGVyZQo+aXMgYW55 IHVuZGlzY2xvc2VkIElQUiBvbiB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0Lgo+Cj5BdXRob3JzLCBwbGVhc2UgcmVwbHkg dG8gdGhpcyBtZXNzYWdlIGluY2x1ZGluZyB0aGUgUEFMUyBXRwo+aW4gdGhlIENDIGxpc3QgaW5k aWNhdGluZyB3aGV0aGVyIG9yIG5vdCB5b3Uga25vdyBvZiBhbnkKPm5vdCB5ZXQgZGlzY2xvc2Vk IElQUiB0aGF0IGlzIGFwcGxpY2FibGUuCj4KPldHIGlmIHlvdSBrbm93IG9mIGFueSBJUFIgdGhh dCBpcyByZWxldmFudCBwbGVhc2UgZGlzY2xvc2UgaXQuCj4KPlRoaXMgcG9sbCB3aWxsIGVuZCAx MiBNYXkgMjAxNSwgb3Igd2hlbiBJIGhhdmUgaGVhcmQgZnJvbSBhbGwKPmF1dGhvcnMsIHdoaWNo IGV2ZXIgaXMgbGF0ZXIuCj4KPlRoYW5rcwo+Cj5TdGV3YXJ0Cj4KPgo= ----_com.android.email_43197682657560 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 U3Rld2FydCw8YnI+PGJyPkkmIzM5O20gbm90IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgdGhhdCByZWxhdGVz IHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQuPGJyPjxicj5DaGVlcnMsIEh1dWIuPGJyPjxicj5TZW50IGZyb20gSHVh d2VpIE1vYmlsZTxicj48YnI+U3Rld2FydCBCcnlhbnQgJmx0O3N0YnJ5YW50QGNpc2NvLmNvbSZn dDsgd3JvdGU6PGJyPjxicj4NCiAgICBUaGUgYXV0aG9ycyBvZiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLXBhbHMtbXMt cHctcHJvdGVjdGlvbiBoYXZlIHJlcXVlc3RlZDxicj4NCiAgICB0aGF0IEkgbWFrZSBhIFdHIGxh c3QgY2FsbCBvbiB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0LiBIb3dldmVyIGZvbGxvd2luZzxicj4NCiAgICBlc3RhYmxp c2hlZCBwcmFjdGljZSBJIGZpcnN0IG5lZWQgdG8gZGV0ZXJtaW5lIHdoZXRoZXIgdGhlcmU8YnI+ DQogICAgaXMgYW55IHVuZGlzY2xvc2VkIElQUiBvbiB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0Ljxicj4NCiAgICA8YnI+ DQogICAgQXV0aG9ycywgcGxlYXNlIHJlcGx5IHRvIHRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSBpbmNsdWRpbmcgdGhl IFBBTFMgV0c8YnI+DQogICAgaW4gdGhlIENDIGxpc3QgaW5kaWNhdGluZyB3aGV0aGVyIG9yIG5v dCB5b3Uga25vdyBvZiBhbnk8YnI+DQogICAgbm90IHlldCBkaXNjbG9zZWQgSVBSIHRoYXQgaXMg YXBwbGljYWJsZS48YnI+DQogICAgPGJyPg0KICAgIFdHIGlmIHlvdSBrbm93IG9mIGFueSBJUFIg dGhhdCBpcyByZWxldmFudCBwbGVhc2UgZGlzY2xvc2UgaXQuPGJyPg0KICAgIDxicj4NCiAgICBU aGlzIHBvbGwgd2lsbCBlbmQgMTIgTWF5IDIwMTUsIG9yIHdoZW4gSSBoYXZlIGhlYXJkIGZyb20g YWxsPGJyPg0KICAgIGF1dGhvcnMsIHdoaWNoIGV2ZXIgaXMgbGF0ZXIuPGJyPg0KICAgIDxicj4N CiAgICBUaGFua3M8YnI+DQogICAgPGJyPg0KICAgIFN0ZXdhcnQ8YnI+DQogICAgPGJyPg0KICAg IDxicj4NCiAgICA8bWV0YSBodHRwLWVxdWl2PSJDb250ZW50LVR5cGUiIGNvbnRlbnQ9InRleHQv aHRtbDsNCiAgICAgIGNoYXJzZXQ9d2luZG93cy0xMjUyIj4NCiAg ----_com.android.email_43197682657560-- From nobody Wed Apr 29 03:00:14 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F271ACDA5 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 23:09:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.607 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.607 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RELAY_IS_203=0.994, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M87npiYSYjtV for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 23:09:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exedge.sktelecom.com (exedge.sktelecom.com [203.236.20.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 250B71ACD6E for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 23:09:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SKT-TNETPMX1.SKT.AD (203.236.7.194) by SKT-EXEDGE1.skt.ad (203.236.20.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.298.1; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 15:09:01 +0900 Received: from SKT-TNETPMX1.SKT.AD (150.19.7.243) by skt-tnetpmx1.SKT.AD (150.19.7.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.847.32; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 15:09:38 +0900 Received: from SKT-TNETPMX1.SKT.AD ([fe80::b966:3722:b0f8:ded]) by skt-tnetpmx1.SKT.AD ([fe80::b966:3722:b0f8:ded%24]) with mapi id 15.00.0847.030; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 15:09:38 +0900 From: =?utf-8?B?7Iug7KKF7JykKFNoaW4gSm9uZ3lvb24p?= To: Loa Andersson , "Andrew G. Malis" , Stewart Bryant Thread-Topic: IPR review of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection Thread-Index: AQHQgd4vzIIUaD4Y8UKWSDPRFubkcJ1iP6WAgACjzgCAAJ680A== Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 06:09:38 +0000 Message-ID: <53c23332f9474ec5a28c10fae0551761@skt-tnetpmx1.SKT.AD> References: <553FCC44.4030205@cisco.com> <55406EDA.6000206@pi.nu> In-Reply-To: <55406EDA.6000206@pi.nu> Accept-Language: ko-KR, en-US Content-Language: ko-KR X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [150.23.18.66] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 03:00:13 -0700 Cc: "draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection@tools.ietf.org" , "pals@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] IPR review of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 06:09:45 -0000 RGVhciBBbGwsDQoNCkkgYW0gbm90IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgdGhhdCBhcHBsaWVzIHRvIHRo aXMgZHJhZnQuDQoNCkJlc3QgcmVnYXJkcywNCkpvbmd5b29uDQoNCj4gLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBN ZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCj4gRnJvbTogTG9hIEFuZGVyc3NvbiBbbWFpbHRvOmxvYUBwaS5udV0NCj4g U2VudDogV2VkbmVzZGF5LCBBcHJpbCAyOSwgMjAxNSAyOjQxIFBNDQo+IFRvOiBBbmRyZXcgRy4g TWFsaXM7IFN0ZXdhcnQgQnJ5YW50DQo+IENjOiBwYWxzQGlldGYub3JnOyBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLXBh bHMtbXMtcHctcHJvdGVjdGlvbkB0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZw0KPiBTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogSVBSIHJl dmlldyBvZiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLXBhbHMtbXMtcHctcHJvdGVjdGlvbg0KPiANCj4gU3Rld2FydCwN Cj4gDQo+IEknbSBub3QgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IElQUiB0aGF0IHJlbGF0ZXMgdG8gdGhpcyBkcmFm dC4NCj4gDQo+IC9Mb2ENCj4gDQo+IE9uIDIwMTUtMDQtMjggMjE6NTQsIEFuZHJldyBHLiBNYWxp cyB3cm90ZToNCj4gPiBTdGV3YXJ0LA0KPiA+DQo+ID4gSSBhbSBub3QgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IElQ UiByZWdhcmRpbmcgdGhpcyBkcmFmdC4NCj4gPg0KPiA+IFRoYW5rcywNCj4gPiBBbmR5DQo+ID4N Cj4gPiBPbiBUdWUsIEFwciAyOCwgMjAxNSBhdCAyOjA3IFBNLCBTdGV3YXJ0IEJyeWFudCA8c3Ri cnlhbnRAY2lzY28uY29tDQo+ID4gPG1haWx0bzpzdGJyeWFudEBjaXNjby5jb20+PiB3cm90ZToN Cj4gPg0KPiA+ICAgICBUaGUgYXV0aG9ycyBvZiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLXBhbHMtbXMtcHctcHJvdGVj dGlvbiBoYXZlIHJlcXVlc3RlZA0KPiA+ICAgICB0aGF0IEkgbWFrZSBhIFdHIGxhc3QgY2FsbCBv biB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0LiBIb3dldmVyIGZvbGxvd2luZw0KPiA+ICAgICBlc3RhYmxpc2hlZCBwcmFj dGljZSBJIGZpcnN0IG5lZWQgdG8gZGV0ZXJtaW5lIHdoZXRoZXIgdGhlcmUNCj4gPiAgICAgaXMg YW55IHVuZGlzY2xvc2VkIElQUiBvbiB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0Lg0KPiA+DQo+ID4gICAgIEF1dGhvcnMs IHBsZWFzZSByZXBseSB0byB0aGlzIG1lc3NhZ2UgaW5jbHVkaW5nIHRoZSBQQUxTIFdHDQo+ID4g ICAgIGluIHRoZSBDQyBsaXN0IGluZGljYXRpbmcgd2hldGhlciBvciBub3QgeW91IGtub3cgb2Yg YW55DQo+ID4gICAgIG5vdCB5ZXQgZGlzY2xvc2VkIElQUiB0aGF0IGlzIGFwcGxpY2FibGUuDQo+ ID4NCj4gPiAgICAgV0cgaWYgeW91IGtub3cgb2YgYW55IElQUiB0aGF0IGlzIHJlbGV2YW50IHBs ZWFzZSBkaXNjbG9zZSBpdC4NCj4gPg0KPiA+ICAgICBUaGlzIHBvbGwgd2lsbCBlbmQgMTIgTWF5 IDIwMTUsIG9yIHdoZW4gSSBoYXZlIGhlYXJkIGZyb20gYWxsDQo+ID4gICAgIGF1dGhvcnMsIHdo aWNoIGV2ZXIgaXMgbGF0ZXIuDQo+ID4NCj4gPiAgICAgVGhhbmtzDQo+ID4NCj4gPiAgICAgU3Rl d2FydA0KPiA+DQo+ID4NCj4gPg0KPiANCj4gLS0NCj4gDQo+IA0KPiBMb2EgQW5kZXJzc29uICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgZW1haWw6IGxvYUBtYWlsMDEuaHVhd2VpLmNvbQ0KPiBTZW5p b3IgTVBMUyBFeHBlcnQgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGxvYUBwaS5udQ0KPiBIdWF3 ZWkgVGVjaG5vbG9naWVzIChjb25zdWx0YW50KSAgICAgcGhvbmU6ICs0NiA3MzkgODEgMjEgNjQN Cg== From nobody Wed Apr 29 03:14:38 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58001ACD65 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 03:14:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.51 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KK5SvX3__V3h for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 03:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5774B1A2130 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 03:14:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9152; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1430302475; x=1431512075; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=/8t6P3YdwkfeakQnzXyTzvkO+DliMhZkCEtx5CHHjao=; b=DIZI3+Liz7EARDrw8KJTMZB1jyUYUhBOfV2rQHvWWTxVQNTAv0VLO14C Aj0KXyCIJRGOwquynoyXiawzWCF1JLgXBWTdjZd/jIm8rz4JyVQJugb2z 6WbQH7W03CqTC+Rn7rq3EwcLTiveWokasTkEWXaG0Fhpt7CIjVIOc1kFH E=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,670,1422921600"; d="scan'208,217";a="454393633" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Apr 2015 10:14:34 +0000 Received: from [64.103.106.132] (dhcp-bdlk10-data-vlan300-64-103-106-132.cisco.com [64.103.106.132]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3TAEWJO009520; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:14:33 GMT Message-ID: <5540AF0B.2050101@cisco.com> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:14:35 +0100 From: Stewart Bryant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Andrew G. Malis" References: <553FCDE1.5010305@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040206000108090502050703" Archived-At: Cc: draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection@tools.ietf.org, "pals@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pals] Some comments on draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection-01.txt X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:14:37 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040206000108090502050703 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 28/04/2015 21:09, Andrew G. Malis wrote: > Stewart, > > Thanks for your comments. > > 1) Regarding standards track, this was discussed during the WG > adoption poll. At that time, Greg Mirsky wrote: > > > Firstly, I support adoption of this document by the WG. > Second, considering that the document doesn’t put forth any IANA > requests, nor changes any earlier defined procedures but rather > document applicability of the RFC 6478, would authors consider > Informational track for this document? > > > To which I replied: > > Thanks for your support, and yes we would, although we prefer > standards track so that it would be marked as "Updates 6870" in > the RFC database, so anyone implementing 6870 will also read it, > and a reference added if there's ever a 6870-bis. > > > This answer still holds, since it extends the applicability of RFC > 6870, making it standards track insures that future readers of 6870 > should also read it. I don't think that would be the case were it > informational. > > We (the authors) are of course willing to further discuss this, we > just want to make sure that it get the proper visibility to readers of > 6870. > I am not sure that it does actually update RFC6870. An RFC6870 implementation that ignored this would not be incorrect in any way. It seems to me that this is ships in the night WRT RFC6870. I am not sure I buy the -bis argument either since anyone competent to write the bis would find this. - Stewart > 2) Appendix 1 is already clear that it is optional, it's right in the > title as well as the final paragraph of section A.1, and in the > abstract at the top of the draft as well. However, let us know if you > have any specific changes you would like to see in the text. > > 3) I'll poll the authors about this. > > Thanks again, > Andy > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Stewart Bryant > wrote: > > I have some comments on draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection > > 1) I am not sure whether this is standards track or not. I does not > really specify a new protocol, it just describes how you would use > an existing protocol in a new environment. It seems to me that > this should either be an informational or perhaps an applicability > statement. > > 2) If this were ST, then I think it would be useful to clarify that > Appendix 1 is not normative. > > 3) I count six authors, hopefully you can justify this to the IESG > if asked. > > - Stewart > > _______________________________________________ > Pals mailing list > Pals@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals > > -- For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html --------------040206000108090502050703 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On 28/04/2015 21:09, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
Stewart,

Thanks for your comments. 

1) Regarding standards track, this was discussed during the WG adoption poll. At that time, Greg Mirsky wrote:

Firstly, I support adoption of this document by the WG.
Second, considering that the document doesn’t put forth any IANA requests, nor changes any earlier defined procedures but rather document applicability of the RFC 6478, would authors consider Informational track for this document?

To which I replied:

Thanks for your support, and yes we would, although we prefer standards track so that it would be marked as "Updates 6870" in the RFC database, so anyone implementing 6870 will also read it, and a reference added if there's ever a 6870-bis.

This answer still holds, since it extends the applicability of RFC 6870, making it standards track insures that future readers of 6870 should also read it. I don't think that would be the case were it informational.

We (the authors) are of course willing to further discuss this, we just want to make sure that it get the proper visibility to readers of 6870.

I am not sure that it does actually update RFC6870.

An RFC6870 implementation that ignored this would not be incorrect in any way. It seems to me that this is ships in the night WRT RFC6870.

I am not sure I buy the -bis argument either since anyone competent to write the bis would find this.

- Stewart
2) Appendix 1 is already clear that it is optional, it's right in the title as well as the final paragraph of section A.1, and in the abstract at the top of the draft as well. However, let us know if you have any specific changes you would like to see in the text.

3) I'll poll the authors about this.

Thanks again,
Andy


On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> wrote:
I have some comments on draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection

1) I am not sure whether this is standards track or not. I does not
really specify a new protocol, it just describes how you would use
an existing protocol in a new environment. It seems to me that
this should either be an informational or perhaps an applicability
statement.

2) If this were ST, then I think it would be useful to clarify that
Appendix 1 is not normative.

3) I count six authors,  hopefully you can justify this to the IESG
if asked.

- Stewart

_______________________________________________
Pals mailing list
Pals@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals



-- 
For corporate legal information go to:

http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
--------------040206000108090502050703-- From nobody Wed Apr 29 04:11:14 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A0E1B2C30 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 04:11:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PAoEFezwbJTh for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 04:11:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am1on0787.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe00::787]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E10D1A6F11 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 04:10:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DB3PR03MB0780.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.161.55.12) by DB3PR03MB025.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.242.136.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.125.19; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:41:55 +0000 Received: from DB3PR03MB0780.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.161.55.12) by DB3PR03MB0780.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.161.55.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.148.16; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:41:55 +0000 Received: from DB3PR03MB0780.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([25.161.55.12]) by DB3PR03MB0780.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([25.161.55.12]) with mapi id 15.01.0148.008; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:41:55 +0000 From: Alexander Vainshtein To: "Andrew G. Malis (agmalis@gmail.com)" , "Stewart Bryant (stbryant@cisco.com)" Thread-Topic: Re: WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe Thread-Index: AdCCaMiQmpyu9SJ3QEGkCeDmOzBMuQ== Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:41:54 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; x-originating-ip: [147.234.56.21] x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB3PR03MB0780; UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB3PR03MB025; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:DB3PR03MB0780; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB3PR03MB0780; x-forefront-prvs: 05610E64EE x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(53754006)(252514010)(16236675004)(50986999)(5001770100001)(46102003)(76576001)(74316001)(54356999)(66066001)(33656002)(19625215002)(19609705001)(15975445007)(2900100001)(19580395003)(92566002)(102836002)(86362001)(77156002)(122556002)(62966003)(230783001)(19580405001)(19300405004)(40100003)(87936001)(5001960100001)(2656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB3PR03MB0780; H:DB3PR03MB0780.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DB3PR03MB0780D8A4CC05DA123861E32D9DD70DB3PR03MB0780eurp_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Apr 2015 10:41:54.9630 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2c514a61-08de-4519-b4c0-921fef62c42a X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB3PR03MB0780 X-OriginatorOrg: ecitele.com Archived-At: Cc: "Dongjie \(Jimmy\)" , "pals@ietf.org" , "Wanghaibo \(Rainsword\)" Subject: Re: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:11:13 -0000 --_000_DB3PR03MB0780D8A4CC05DA123861E32D9DD70DB3PR03MB0780eurp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I have read the draft and I support requesting its publication from IESG. I have the following comments that should be resolved complete with other W= G LC comments: 1. The draft (in its current version) is intended for Proposed Standa= rd, but it does not contain any MUST/MUST NOT requirements. In particular, = all the requirements in Section 3 "SPE Operation" are marked as SHOULD. Fro= m my POV this may cause potential interoperability problems. I suggest to r= edefine some (possibly all) requirements in this section as MUST to avoid a= ny such issues. 2. The draft explicitly mentions MS-PWs with some (or even all) segme= nts being statically configured and presumably relies on static PW Status m= essages (as per RFC 6478) for carrying the Preferential Forwarding bit acro= ss static segments. However, RFC 6478 allows sending static PW status messa= ges also end-to-end (in the so-called SPE Bypass mode). This mode is clearl= y incompatible with the mechanism defined in the draft, and I suggest to me= ntion it explicitly to avoid any ambiguity. Hopefully these comments will be useful. Regards, Sasha Office: +972-39266302 Cell: +972-549266302 Email: Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com --_000_DB3PR03MB0780D8A4CC05DA123861E32D9DD70DB3PR03MB0780eurp_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

I have read the draft and I support requesting its p= ublication from IESG.

 

I have the following comments that should be resolve= d complete with other WG LC comments:

 

1.     &= nbsp; The draft (in its current = version) is intended for Proposed Standard, but it does not contain any MUS= T/MUST NOT requirements. In particular, all the requirements in Section 3 &= #8220;SPE Operation” are marked as SHOULD. From my POV this may cause potential interoperability problems. I suggest = to redefine some (possibly all) requirements in this section as MUST to avo= id any such issues.

2.     &= nbsp; The draft explicitly menti= ons MS-PWs with some (or even all) segments being statically configured and= presumably relies on static PW Status messages (as per RFC 6478) for carry= ing the Preferential Forwarding bit across static segments. However, RFC 6478 allows sending static PW status = messages also end-to-end (in the so-called SPE Bypass mode). This mode is c= learly incompatible with the mechanism defined in the draft, and I suggest = to mention it explicitly to avoid any ambiguity.

 

Hopefully these comments will be useful.<= /p>

 

Regards,

Sasha

 

Office: +972-39266302

Cell:      +972-5492663= 02

Email:   Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com<= o:p>

 

--_000_DB3PR03MB0780D8A4CC05DA123861E32D9DD70DB3PR03MB0780eurp_-- From nobody Wed Apr 29 06:32:20 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E70E1A1B0D for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 06:32:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OH_Wgvo-PhNy for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 06:32:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86F341A1B2C for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 06:32:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by widdi4 with SMTP id di4so65999356wid.0 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 06:32:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=NEj12L1t3dmTmpQiZiRGUaZRG0c7RgEPj7T92QYbBBA=; b=kxvkxnvAWPav/uK99sZM6vcHPyFwgYzphu+20azonmTDyFrx11ahWYwyCIJlFcvxZd jcyK7idn8wzGrl9CkZ/kXeWPsYtfy1LQ10jzA93rRcyUshxAv85ZkYMAWcKwJTmK3xxS 70/xAVnaHNKbAZLETqISuGf8E+PcxbxRfcyDVhOFO+D/VAd8HxQLf8s5NRopQj09aqis 494yXwWBgxtwNKY20zvLpwDx5y0rFkIeBdJUc/iFKdeOGntETLACtKYCI0Ww6y7VVCoi 98k1hV78cKs/SomnBMNVjmK+M//e9ZOd4hpaW4/JFNAlbraexYWHEHw+743TR9sLRR+P 2NOA== X-Received: by 10.180.93.193 with SMTP id cw1mr8979725wib.12.1430314335192; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 06:32:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.182.215 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 06:31:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: "Andrew G. Malis" Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:31:54 -0400 Message-ID: To: Alexander Vainshtein Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043bdededdcc1e0514dd0188 Archived-At: Cc: "Dongjie \(Jimmy\)" , "Wanghaibo \(Rainsword\)" , "pals@ietf.org" , "Stewart Bryant \(stbryant@cisco.com\)" Subject: Re: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:32:18 -0000 --f46d043bdededdcc1e0514dd0188 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Regarding comment 2, Sasha had a similar comment for draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection. There, I resolved the comment by adding the text "Note that the optional S-PE Bypass Mode defined in Section 5.5 of RFC 6478 cannot be used, as it requires LDP signaling." Similar text can be used here as well. Cheers, Andy On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Alexander Vainshtein < Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have read the draft and I support requesting its publication from IESG. > > > > I have the following comments that should be resolved complete with other > WG LC comments: > > > > 1. The draft (in its current version) is intended for Proposed > Standard, but it does not contain any MUST/MUST NOT requirements. In > particular, all the requirements in Section 3 =E2=80=9CSPE Operation=E2= =80=9D are marked as > SHOULD. From my POV this may cause potential interoperability problems. I > suggest to redefine some (possibly all) requirements in this section as > MUST to avoid any such issues. > > 2. The draft explicitly mentions MS-PWs with some (or even all) > segments being statically configured and presumably relies on static PW > Status messages (as per RFC 6478) for carrying the Preferential Forwardin= g > bit across static segments. However, RFC 6478 allows sending static PW > status messages also end-to-end (in the so-called SPE Bypass mode). This > mode is clearly incompatible with the mechanism defined in the draft, and= I > suggest to mention it explicitly to avoid any ambiguity. > > > > Hopefully these comments will be useful. > > > > Regards, > > Sasha > > > > Office: +972-39266302 > > Cell: +972-549266302 > > Email: Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com > > > --f46d043bdededdcc1e0514dd0188 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Regarding comment 2, Sasha had a similar comment for=C2=A0= draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection. There, I resolved the comment by adding t= he text "Note that the optional S-PE Bypass Mode defined in Section 5.= 5 of RFC 6478 cannot be used, as it requires LDP signaling." Similar t= ext can be used here as well.

Cheers,
Andy


On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com> wrote:

Hi all,

I have read the draft and I support requesting its p= ublication from IESG.

=C2=A0

I have the following comments that should be resolve= d complete with other WG LC comments:

=C2=A0

1.= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 The draft (in its current ver= sion) is intended for Proposed Standard, but it does not contain any MUST/M= UST NOT requirements. In particular, all the requirements in Section 3 =E2= =80=9CSPE Operation=E2=80=9D are marked as SHOULD. From my POV this may cause potential interoperability problems. I suggest = to redefine some (possibly all) requirements in this section as MUST to avo= id any such issues.

2.= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 The draft explicitly mentions= MS-PWs with some (or even all) segments being statically configured and pr= esumably relies on static PW Status messages (as per RFC 6478) for carrying= the Preferential Forwarding bit across static segments. However, RFC 6478 allows sending static PW status = messages also end-to-end (in the so-called SPE Bypass mode). This mode is c= learly incompatible with the mechanism defined in the draft, and I suggest = to mention it explicitly to avoid any ambiguity.

=C2=A0

Hopefully these comments will be useful.

=C2=A0

Regards,

Sasha

=C2=A0

Office: +972-39266302

Cell:=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 +972-549266302

Email:=C2=A0=C2=A0 Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com

=C2=A0


--f46d043bdededdcc1e0514dd0188-- From nobody Wed Apr 29 06:59:48 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1901A6EDE for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 06:59:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.891 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.891 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Yvrg54ZluZ6 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 06:59:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am1on0732.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe00::732]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1DDF1A1BE9 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 06:59:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DB3PR03MB0780.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.161.55.12) by DB3PR03MB0777.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.161.54.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.154.19; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:58:49 +0000 Received: from DB3PR03MB0780.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([25.161.55.12]) by DB3PR03MB0780.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([25.161.55.12]) with mapi id 15.01.0148.008; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:58:49 +0000 From: Alexander Vainshtein To: "Andrew G. Malis" Thread-Topic: WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe Thread-Index: AQHQgoDpgRmzcCAaXEO7mShhZBiye51kA0TA Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:58:49 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; x-originating-ip: [147.234.56.21] x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB3PR03MB0777; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:DB3PR03MB0777; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB3PR03MB0777; x-forefront-prvs: 05610E64EE x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(53754006)(252514010)(24454002)(377454003)(110136001)(87936001)(74316001)(16236675004)(230783001)(66066001)(19580405001)(40100003)(122556002)(2656002)(1411001)(19625215002)(86362001)(33656002)(76576001)(62966003)(77156002)(54356999)(76176999)(19300405004)(50986999)(2900100001)(46102003)(92566002)(106116001)(2950100001)(19580395003)(5001960100001)(102836002)(19609705001)(15975445007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB3PR03MB0777; H:DB3PR03MB0780.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DB3PR03MB0780512185EBCB2C62B29ACD9DD70DB3PR03MB0780eurp_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: ecitele.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Apr 2015 13:58:49.4825 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2c514a61-08de-4519-b4c0-921fef62c42a X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB3PR03MB0777 Archived-At: Cc: "Dongjie \(Jimmy\)" , "Wanghaibo \(Rainsword\)" , "pals@ietf.org" , "Stewart Bryant \(stbryant@cisco.com\)" Subject: Re: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:59:46 -0000 --_000_DB3PR03MB0780512185EBCB2C62B29ACD9DD70DB3PR03MB0780eurp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 QW5keSwNCldvcmtzIGZpbmUgZm9yIG1lIGluIGJvdGggY2FzZXMuDQoNCkludGVyZXN0aW5nIHRo b3VnaCB0aGF0IFMtUEUgQnlwYXNzIG1vZGUgZ2V0cyBmb3Jnb3R0ZW4gc28gb2Z0ZW7imLrigKYN Cg0KUmVnYXJkcywNClNhc2hhDQoNCk9mZmljZTogKzk3Mi0zOTI2NjMwMg0KQ2VsbDogICAgICAr OTcyLTU0OTI2NjMwMg0KRW1haWw6ICAgQWxleGFuZGVyLlZhaW5zaHRlaW5AZWNpdGVsZS5jb20N Cg0KRnJvbTogQW5kcmV3IEcuIE1hbGlzIFttYWlsdG86YWdtYWxpc0BnbWFpbC5jb21dDQpTZW50 OiBXZWRuZXNkYXksIEFwcmlsIDI5LCAyMDE1IDQ6MzIgUE0NClRvOiBBbGV4YW5kZXIgVmFpbnNo dGVpbg0KQ2M6IFN0ZXdhcnQgQnJ5YW50IChzdGJyeWFudEBjaXNjby5jb20pOyBEb25namllIChK aW1teSk7IFdhbmdoYWlibyAoUmFpbnN3b3JkKTsgcGFsc0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KU3ViamVjdDogUmU6 IFdHIExhc3QgQ2FsbCAtIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtcGFscy1yZWR1bmRhbmN5LXNwZQ0KDQpSZWdhcmRp bmcgY29tbWVudCAyLCBTYXNoYSBoYWQgYSBzaW1pbGFyIGNvbW1lbnQgZm9yIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYt cGFscy1tcy1wdy1wcm90ZWN0aW9uLiBUaGVyZSwgSSByZXNvbHZlZCB0aGUgY29tbWVudCBieSBh ZGRpbmcgdGhlIHRleHQgIk5vdGUgdGhhdCB0aGUgb3B0aW9uYWwgUy1QRSBCeXBhc3MgTW9kZSBk ZWZpbmVkIGluIFNlY3Rpb24gNS41IG9mIFJGQyA2NDc4IGNhbm5vdCBiZSB1c2VkLCBhcyBpdCBy ZXF1aXJlcyBMRFAgc2lnbmFsaW5nLiIgU2ltaWxhciB0ZXh0IGNhbiBiZSB1c2VkIGhlcmUgYXMg d2VsbC4NCg0KQ2hlZXJzLA0KQW5keQ0KDQoNCk9uIFdlZCwgQXByIDI5LCAyMDE1IGF0IDY6NDEg QU0sIEFsZXhhbmRlciBWYWluc2h0ZWluIDxBbGV4YW5kZXIuVmFpbnNodGVpbkBlY2l0ZWxlLmNv bTxtYWlsdG86QWxleGFuZGVyLlZhaW5zaHRlaW5AZWNpdGVsZS5jb20+PiB3cm90ZToNCkhpIGFs bCwNCkkgaGF2ZSByZWFkIHRoZSBkcmFmdCBhbmQgSSBzdXBwb3J0IHJlcXVlc3RpbmcgaXRzIHB1 YmxpY2F0aW9uIGZyb20gSUVTRy4NCg0KSSBoYXZlIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgY29tbWVudHMgdGhh dCBzaG91bGQgYmUgcmVzb2x2ZWQgY29tcGxldGUgd2l0aCBvdGhlciBXRyBMQyBjb21tZW50czoN Cg0KDQoxLiAgICAgICBUaGUgZHJhZnQgKGluIGl0cyBjdXJyZW50IHZlcnNpb24pIGlzIGludGVu ZGVkIGZvciBQcm9wb3NlZCBTdGFuZGFyZCwgYnV0IGl0IGRvZXMgbm90IGNvbnRhaW4gYW55IE1V U1QvTVVTVCBOT1QgcmVxdWlyZW1lbnRzLiBJbiBwYXJ0aWN1bGFyLCBhbGwgdGhlIHJlcXVpcmVt ZW50cyBpbiBTZWN0aW9uIDMg4oCcU1BFIE9wZXJhdGlvbuKAnSBhcmUgbWFya2VkIGFzIFNIT1VM RC4gRnJvbSBteSBQT1YgdGhpcyBtYXkgY2F1c2UgcG90ZW50aWFsIGludGVyb3BlcmFiaWxpdHkg cHJvYmxlbXMuIEkgc3VnZ2VzdCB0byByZWRlZmluZSBzb21lIChwb3NzaWJseSBhbGwpIHJlcXVp cmVtZW50cyBpbiB0aGlzIHNlY3Rpb24gYXMgTVVTVCB0byBhdm9pZCBhbnkgc3VjaCBpc3N1ZXMu DQoNCjIuICAgICAgIFRoZSBkcmFmdCBleHBsaWNpdGx5IG1lbnRpb25zIE1TLVBXcyB3aXRoIHNv bWUgKG9yIGV2ZW4gYWxsKSBzZWdtZW50cyBiZWluZyBzdGF0aWNhbGx5IGNvbmZpZ3VyZWQgYW5k IHByZXN1bWFibHkgcmVsaWVzIG9uIHN0YXRpYyBQVyBTdGF0dXMgbWVzc2FnZXMgKGFzIHBlciBS RkMgNjQ3OCkgZm9yIGNhcnJ5aW5nIHRoZSBQcmVmZXJlbnRpYWwgRm9yd2FyZGluZyBiaXQgYWNy b3NzIHN0YXRpYyBzZWdtZW50cy4gSG93ZXZlciwgUkZDIDY0NzggYWxsb3dzIHNlbmRpbmcgc3Rh dGljIFBXIHN0YXR1cyBtZXNzYWdlcyBhbHNvIGVuZC10by1lbmQgKGluIHRoZSBzby1jYWxsZWQg U1BFIEJ5cGFzcyBtb2RlKS4gVGhpcyBtb2RlIGlzIGNsZWFybHkgaW5jb21wYXRpYmxlIHdpdGgg dGhlIG1lY2hhbmlzbSBkZWZpbmVkIGluIHRoZSBkcmFmdCwgYW5kIEkgc3VnZ2VzdCB0byBtZW50 aW9uIGl0IGV4cGxpY2l0bHkgdG8gYXZvaWQgYW55IGFtYmlndWl0eS4NCg0KSG9wZWZ1bGx5IHRo ZXNlIGNvbW1lbnRzIHdpbGwgYmUgdXNlZnVsLg0KDQpSZWdhcmRzLA0KU2FzaGENCg0KT2ZmaWNl OiArOTcyLTM5MjY2MzAyPHRlbDolMkI5NzItMzkyNjYzMDI+DQpDZWxsOiAgICAgICs5NzItNTQ5 MjY2MzAyPHRlbDolMkI5NzItNTQ5MjY2MzAyPg0KRW1haWw6ICAgQWxleGFuZGVyLlZhaW5zaHRl aW5AZWNpdGVsZS5jb208bWFpbHRvOkFsZXhhbmRlci5WYWluc2h0ZWluQGVjaXRlbGUuY29tPg0K DQoNCg== --_000_DB3PR03MB0780512185EBCB2C62B29ACD9DD70DB3PR03MB0780eurp_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWwgeG1sbnM6dj0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTp2bWwiIHhtbG5zOm89InVy bjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206b2ZmaWNlOm9mZmljZSIgeG1sbnM6dz0idXJuOnNjaGVt YXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6d29yZCIgeG1sbnM6bT0iaHR0cDovL3NjaGVtYXMubWlj cm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9vZmZpY2UvMjAwNC8xMi9vbW1sIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcv VFIvUkVDLWh0bWw0MCI+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIg Y29udGVudD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9IkdlbmVyYXRv ciIgY29udGVudD0iTWljcm9zb2Z0IFdvcmQgMTQgKGZpbHRlcmVkIG1lZGl1bSkiPg0KPHN0eWxl PjwhLS0NCi8qIEZvbnQgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6 V2luZ2RpbmdzOw0KCXBhbm9zZS0xOjUgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDA7fQ0KQGZvbnQtZmFjZQ0K CXtmb250LWZhbWlseTpXaW5nZGluZ3M7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6NSAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMDt9 DQpAZm9udC1mYWNlDQoJe2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OkNhbGlicmk7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6MiAxNSA1IDIg MiAyIDQgMyAyIDQ7fQ0KQGZvbnQtZmFjZQ0KCXtmb250LWZhbWlseTpUYWhvbWE7DQoJcGFub3Nl LTE6MiAxMSA2IDQgMyA1IDQgNCAyIDQ7fQ0KQGZvbnQtZmFjZQ0KCXtmb250LWZhbWlseTpBaGFy b25pOw0KCXBhbm9zZS0xOjIgMSA4IDMgMiAxIDQgMyAyIDM7fQ0KLyogU3R5bGUgRGVmaW5pdGlv bnMgKi8NCnAuTXNvTm9ybWFsLCBsaS5Nc29Ob3JtYWwsIGRpdi5Nc29Ob3JtYWwNCgl7bWFyZ2lu OjBjbTsNCgltYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOi4wMDAxcHQ7DQoJZm9udC1zaXplOjEyLjBwdDsNCglmb250 LWZhbWlseToiVGltZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFuIiwic2VyaWYiO30NCmE6bGluaywgc3Bhbi5Nc29IeXBl cmxpbmsNCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXByaW9yaXR5Ojk5Ow0KCWNvbG9yOmJsdWU7DQoJdGV4dC1kZWNv cmF0aW9uOnVuZGVybGluZTt9DQphOnZpc2l0ZWQsIHNwYW4uTXNvSHlwZXJsaW5rRm9sbG93ZWQN Cgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXByaW9yaXR5Ojk5Ow0KCWNvbG9yOnB1cnBsZTsNCgl0ZXh0LWRlY29yYXRp b246dW5kZXJsaW5lO30NCnANCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXByaW9yaXR5Ojk5Ow0KCW1zby1tYXJnaW4t dG9wLWFsdDphdXRvOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1yaWdodDowY207DQoJbXNvLW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b20tYWx0 OmF1dG87DQoJbWFyZ2luLWxlZnQ6MGNtOw0KCWZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMi4wcHQ7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1p bHk6IlRpbWVzIE5ldyBSb21hbiIsInNlcmlmIjt9DQpzcGFuLkVtYWlsU3R5bGUxOA0KCXttc28t c3R5bGUtdHlwZTpwZXJzb25hbC1yZXBseTsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToiQ2FsaWJyaSIsInNhbnMt c2VyaWYiOw0KCWZvbnQtdmFyaWFudDpub3JtYWwgIWltcG9ydGFudDsNCgljb2xvcjojMUY0OTdE Ow0KCXRleHQtdHJhbnNmb3JtOm5vbmU7DQoJdGV4dC1kZWNvcmF0aW9uOm5vbmUgbm9uZTsNCgl2 ZXJ0aWNhbC1hbGlnbjpiYXNlbGluZTt9DQouTXNvQ2hwRGVmYXVsdA0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtdHlw ZTpleHBvcnQtb25seTsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToiQ2FsaWJyaSIsInNhbnMtc2VyaWYiO30NCkBw YWdlIFdvcmRTZWN0aW9uMQ0KCXtzaXplOjYxMi4wcHQgNzkyLjBwdDsNCgltYXJnaW46NzIuMHB0 IDkwLjBwdCA3Mi4wcHQgOTAuMHB0O30NCmRpdi5Xb3JkU2VjdGlvbjENCgl7cGFnZTpXb3JkU2Vj dGlvbjE7fQ0KLS0+PC9zdHlsZT48IS0tW2lmIGd0ZSBtc28gOV0+PHhtbD4NCjxvOnNoYXBlZGVm YXVsdHMgdjpleHQ9ImVkaXQiIHNwaWRtYXg9IjEwMjYiIC8+DQo8L3htbD48IVtlbmRpZl0tLT48 IS0tW2lmIGd0ZSBtc28gOV0+PHhtbD4NCjxvOnNoYXBlbGF5b3V0IHY6ZXh0PSJlZGl0Ij4NCjxv OmlkbWFwIHY6ZXh0PSJlZGl0IiBkYXRhPSIxIiAvPg0KPC9vOnNoYXBlbGF5b3V0PjwveG1sPjwh W2VuZGlmXS0tPg0KPC9oZWFkPg0KPGJvZHkgbGFuZz0iRU4tVVMiIGxpbms9ImJsdWUiIHZsaW5r PSJwdXJwbGUiPg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iV29yZFNlY3Rpb24xIj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3Jt YWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NhbGli cmkmcXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZxdW90Oztjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj5BbmR5LDxvOnA+ PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250 LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NhbGlicmkmcXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1z ZXJpZiZxdW90Oztjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj5Xb3JrcyBmaW5lIGZvciBtZSBpbiBib3RoIGNhc2Vz LjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxl PSJmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NhbGlicmkmcXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7 c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZxdW90Oztjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48 L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdDtm b250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDs7Y29s b3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+SW50ZXJlc3RpbmcgdGhvdWdoIHRoYXQgUy1QRSBCeXBhc3MgbW9kZSBnZXRz IGZvcmdvdHRlbiBzbyBvZnRlbjwvc3Bhbj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdDtm b250LWZhbWlseTpXaW5nZGluZ3M7Y29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+Sjwvc3Bhbj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0i Zm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3Nh bnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDs7Y29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+4oCmPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0K PHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1m YW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7O2NvbG9yOiMx RjQ5N0QiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwi PjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NhbGlicmkm cXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZxdW90Oztjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj5SZWdhcmRzLDxvOnA+ PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250 LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NhbGlicmkmcXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1z ZXJpZiZxdW90Oztjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj5TYXNoYTxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxw IGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFt aWx5OiZxdW90O0NhbGlicmkmcXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZxdW90Oztjb2xvcjojMUY0 OTdEIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48 c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1 b3Q7LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDs7Y29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+T2ZmaWNlOiAmIzQzOzk3 Mi0zOTI2NjMwMjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxz cGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NhbGlicmkmcXVv dDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZxdW90Oztjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj5DZWxsOiZuYnNwOyZuYnNw OyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyAmIzQzOzk3Mi01NDkyNjYzMDI8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48 L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdDtm b250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDs7Y29s b3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+RW1haWw6Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7IEFsZXhhbmRlci5WYWluc2h0ZWluQGVjaXRl bGUuY29tPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4g c3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90Oywm cXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7O2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9z cGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6 MTAuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O1RhaG9tYSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1 b3Q7Ij5Gcm9tOjwvc3Bhbj48L2I+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC4wcHQ7Zm9udC1m YW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7VGFob21hJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDsiPiBBbmRyZXcg Ry4gTWFsaXMgW21haWx0bzphZ21hbGlzQGdtYWlsLmNvbV0NCjxicj4NCjxiPlNlbnQ6PC9iPiBX ZWRuZXNkYXksIEFwcmlsIDI5LCAyMDE1IDQ6MzIgUE08YnI+DQo8Yj5Ubzo8L2I+IEFsZXhhbmRl ciBWYWluc2h0ZWluPGJyPg0KPGI+Q2M6PC9iPiBTdGV3YXJ0IEJyeWFudCAoc3RicnlhbnRAY2lz Y28uY29tKTsgRG9uZ2ppZSAoSmltbXkpOyBXYW5naGFpYm8gKFJhaW5zd29yZCk7IHBhbHNAaWV0 Zi5vcmc8YnI+DQo8Yj5TdWJqZWN0OjwvYj4gUmU6IFdHIExhc3QgQ2FsbCAtIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYt cGFscy1yZWR1bmRhbmN5LXNwZTxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29O b3JtYWwiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwi PlJlZ2FyZGluZyBjb21tZW50IDIsIFNhc2hhIGhhZCBhIHNpbWlsYXIgY29tbWVudCBmb3ImbmJz cDtkcmFmdC1pZXRmLXBhbHMtbXMtcHctcHJvdGVjdGlvbi4gVGhlcmUsIEkgcmVzb2x2ZWQgdGhl IGNvbW1lbnQgYnkgYWRkaW5nIHRoZSB0ZXh0ICZxdW90O05vdGUgdGhhdCB0aGUgb3B0aW9uYWwg Uy1QRSBCeXBhc3MgTW9kZSBkZWZpbmVkIGluIFNlY3Rpb24gNS41IG9mIFJGQyA2NDc4IGNhbm5v dCBiZSB1c2VkLCBhcyBpdCByZXF1aXJlcw0KIExEUCBzaWduYWxpbmcuJnF1b3Q7IFNpbWlsYXIg dGV4dCBjYW4gYmUgdXNlZCBoZXJlIGFzIHdlbGwuPG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAg Y2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8 cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5DaGVlcnMsPG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+ DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5BbmR5PG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+ DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9k aXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+DQo8 ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+T24gV2VkLCBBcHIgMjksIDIwMTUgYXQgNjo0MSBB TSwgQWxleGFuZGVyIFZhaW5zaHRlaW4gJmx0OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpBbGV4YW5kZXIuVmFp bnNodGVpbkBlY2l0ZWxlLmNvbSIgdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxhbmsiPkFsZXhhbmRlci5WYWluc2h0ZWlu QGVjaXRlbGUuY29tPC9hPiZndDsgd3JvdGU6PG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4N CjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiIHN0eWxlPSJtc28tbWFyZ2luLXRvcC1hbHQ6YXV0bzttc28t bWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbS1hbHQ6YXV0byI+SGkgYWxsLDxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9 Ik1zb05vcm1hbCIgc3R5bGU9Im1zby1tYXJnaW4tdG9wLWFsdDphdXRvO21zby1tYXJnaW4tYm90 dG9tLWFsdDphdXRvIj5JIGhhdmUgcmVhZCB0aGUgZHJhZnQgYW5kIEkgc3VwcG9ydCByZXF1ZXN0 aW5nIGl0cyBwdWJsaWNhdGlvbiBmcm9tIElFU0cuPG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0i TXNvTm9ybWFsIiBzdHlsZT0ibXNvLW1hcmdpbi10b3AtYWx0OmF1dG87bXNvLW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0 b20tYWx0OmF1dG8iPiZuYnNwOzxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCIg c3R5bGU9Im1zby1tYXJnaW4tdG9wLWFsdDphdXRvO21zby1tYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tLWFsdDphdXRv Ij5JIGhhdmUgdGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZyBjb21tZW50cyB0aGF0IHNob3VsZCBiZSByZXNvbHZlZCBj b21wbGV0ZSB3aXRoIG90aGVyIFdHIExDIGNvbW1lbnRzOjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xh c3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCIgc3R5bGU9Im1zby1tYXJnaW4tdG9wLWFsdDphdXRvO21zby1tYXJnaW4t Ym90dG9tLWFsdDphdXRvIj4mbmJzcDs8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxwPjEuPHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9 ImZvbnQtc2l6ZTo3LjBwdCI+Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7IDwv c3Bhbj5UaGUgZHJhZnQgKGluIGl0cyBjdXJyZW50IHZlcnNpb24pIGlzIGludGVuZGVkIGZvciBQ cm9wb3NlZCBTdGFuZGFyZCwgYnV0IGl0IGRvZXMgbm90IGNvbnRhaW4gYW55IE1VU1QvTVVTVCBO T1QgcmVxdWlyZW1lbnRzLiBJbiBwYXJ0aWN1bGFyLCBhbGwgdGhlIHJlcXVpcmVtZW50cyBpbiBT ZWN0aW9uIDMg4oCcU1BFIE9wZXJhdGlvbuKAnSBhcmUgbWFya2VkIGFzIFNIT1VMRC4NCiBGcm9t IG15IFBPViB0aGlzIG1heSBjYXVzZSBwb3RlbnRpYWwgaW50ZXJvcGVyYWJpbGl0eSBwcm9ibGVt cy4gSSBzdWdnZXN0IHRvIHJlZGVmaW5lIHNvbWUgKHBvc3NpYmx5IGFsbCkgcmVxdWlyZW1lbnRz IGluIHRoaXMgc2VjdGlvbiBhcyBNVVNUIHRvIGF2b2lkIGFueSBzdWNoIGlzc3Vlcy48bzpwPjwv bzpwPjwvcD4NCjxwPjIuPHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZTo3LjBwdCI+Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7 Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7IDwvc3Bhbj5UaGUgZHJhZnQgZXhwbGljaXRseSBtZW50 aW9ucyBNUy1QV3Mgd2l0aCBzb21lIChvciBldmVuIGFsbCkgc2VnbWVudHMgYmVpbmcgc3RhdGlj YWxseSBjb25maWd1cmVkIGFuZCBwcmVzdW1hYmx5IHJlbGllcyBvbiBzdGF0aWMgUFcgU3RhdHVz IG1lc3NhZ2VzIChhcyBwZXIgUkZDIDY0NzgpIGZvciBjYXJyeWluZyB0aGUgUHJlZmVyZW50aWFs IEZvcndhcmRpbmcNCiBiaXQgYWNyb3NzIHN0YXRpYyBzZWdtZW50cy4gSG93ZXZlciwgUkZDIDY0 NzggYWxsb3dzIHNlbmRpbmcgc3RhdGljIFBXIHN0YXR1cyBtZXNzYWdlcyBhbHNvIGVuZC10by1l bmQgKGluIHRoZSBzby1jYWxsZWQgU1BFIEJ5cGFzcyBtb2RlKS4gVGhpcyBtb2RlIGlzIGNsZWFy bHkgaW5jb21wYXRpYmxlIHdpdGggdGhlIG1lY2hhbmlzbSBkZWZpbmVkIGluIHRoZSBkcmFmdCwg YW5kIEkgc3VnZ2VzdCB0byBtZW50aW9uIGl0IGV4cGxpY2l0bHkgdG8NCiBhdm9pZCBhbnkgYW1i aWd1aXR5LjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCIgc3R5bGU9Im1zby1t YXJnaW4tdG9wLWFsdDphdXRvO21zby1tYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tLWFsdDphdXRvIj4mbmJzcDs8bzpw PjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiIHN0eWxlPSJtc28tbWFyZ2luLXRvcC1h bHQ6YXV0bzttc28tbWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbS1hbHQ6YXV0byI+SG9wZWZ1bGx5IHRoZXNlIGNvbW1l bnRzIHdpbGwgYmUgdXNlZnVsLjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCIg c3R5bGU9Im1zby1tYXJnaW4tdG9wLWFsdDphdXRvO21zby1tYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tLWFsdDphdXRv Ij4mbmJzcDs8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiIHN0eWxlPSJtc28t bWFyZ2luLXRvcC1hbHQ6YXV0bzttc28tbWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbS1hbHQ6YXV0byI+UmVnYXJkcyw8 bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiIHN0eWxlPSJtc28tbWFyZ2luLXRv cC1hbHQ6YXV0bzttc28tbWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbS1hbHQ6YXV0byI+U2FzaGE8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwv cD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiIHN0eWxlPSJtc28tbWFyZ2luLXRvcC1hbHQ6YXV0bztt c28tbWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbS1hbHQ6YXV0byI+Jm5ic3A7PG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFz cz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIiBzdHlsZT0ibXNvLW1hcmdpbi10b3AtYWx0OmF1dG87bXNvLW1hcmdpbi1i b3R0b20tYWx0OmF1dG8iPk9mZmljZToNCjxhIGhyZWY9InRlbDolMkI5NzItMzkyNjYzMDIiIHRh cmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj4mIzQzOzk3Mi0zOTI2NjMwMjwvYT48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNs YXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiIHN0eWxlPSJtc28tbWFyZ2luLXRvcC1hbHQ6YXV0bzttc28tbWFyZ2lu LWJvdHRvbS1hbHQ6YXV0byI+Q2VsbDombmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsNCjxh IGhyZWY9InRlbDolMkI5NzItNTQ5MjY2MzAyIiB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+JiM0Mzs5NzItNTQ5 MjY2MzAyPC9hPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCIgc3R5bGU9Im1z by1tYXJnaW4tdG9wLWFsdDphdXRvO21zby1tYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tLWFsdDphdXRvIj5FbWFpbDom bmJzcDsmbmJzcDsNCjxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpBbGV4YW5kZXIuVmFpbnNodGVpbkBlY2l0ZWxl LmNvbSIgdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxhbmsiPkFsZXhhbmRlci5WYWluc2h0ZWluQGVjaXRlbGUuY29tPC9h PjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCIgc3R5bGU9Im1zby1tYXJnaW4t dG9wLWFsdDphdXRvO21zby1tYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tLWFsdDphdXRvIj4mbmJzcDs8bzpwPjwvbzpw PjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxvOnA+ Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvYm9keT4NCjwvaHRtbD4NCg== --_000_DB3PR03MB0780512185EBCB2C62B29ACD9DD70DB3PR03MB0780eurp_-- From nobody Wed Apr 29 07:09:39 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DD91A1B23 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 07:09:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.32 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.32 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AqzgCIY7vhVQ for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 07:09:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from TELEDG001RM001.telecomitalia.it (teledg001rm001.telecomitalia.it [217.169.121.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3367D1A6FFC for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 07:06:33 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_9a7a85df-4544-44e3-8470-6862882bbdb5_" Received: from TELCAH007RM001.telecomitalia.local (10.19.10.117) by TELEDG001RM001.telecomitalia.it (10.19.3.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.181.6; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:06:30 +0200 Received: from TELMBA002RM001.telecomitalia.local ([169.254.1.139]) by TELCAH007RM001.telecomitalia.local ([10.19.10.117]) with mapi id 14.03.0181.006; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:06:30 +0200 From: D'Alessandro Alessandro Gerardo To: "stbryant@cisco.com" , "pals@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: IPR review of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection Thread-Index: AQHQgd4sLjQUzysSV0qJoJfezfHTH51kBkFQ Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 14:06:29 +0000 Message-ID: <22257C41A415324A984CD03D63344E2791527E28@TELMBA002RM001.telecomitalia.local> References: <553FCC44.4030205@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <553FCC44.4030205@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: it-IT X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.19.10.78] x-ti-disclaimer: Disclaimer1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection@tools.ietf.org" Subject: [Pals] R: IPR review of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 14:09:38 -0000 --_9a7a85df-4544-44e3-8470-6862882bbdb5_ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_22257C41A415324A984CD03D63344E2791527E28TELMBA002RM001t_" --_000_22257C41A415324A984CD03D63344E2791527E28TELMBA002RM001t_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Stewart, I'm not aware of any IPR that relates to this draft. Best regards, Alessandro Sent by Samsung Mobile! ------------------------------------------------------------------ Telecom Italia Alessandro Gerardo D'Alessandro Transport Innovation Via Reiss Romoli, 274 - 10148 Torino phone: +39 011 228 5887 mobile: +39 335 766 9607 fax: +39 06 418 639 07 Da: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stbryant@cisco.com] Inviato: marted=EC 28 aprile 2015 20:07 A: pals@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection@tools.ietf.org Oggetto: IPR review of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection The authors of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection have requested that I make a WG last call on this draft. However following established practice I first need to determine whether there is any undisclosed IPR on this draft. Authors, please reply to this message including the PALS WG in the CC list indicating whether or not you know of any not yet disclosed IPR that is applicable. WG if you know of any IPR that is relevant please disclose it. This poll will end 12 May 2015, or when I have heard from all authors, which ever is later. Thanks Stewart Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle per= sone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dall= a conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abb= iate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di dar= ne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione= , Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged = information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, pri= nting or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended r= ecipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sen= der by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non = =E8 necessario. --_000_22257C41A415324A984CD03D63344E2791527E28TELMBA002RM001t_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear Stewart,

 

I'm not aware of any IPR that relates to this draft.=

 

Best regards,

Alessandro

 

Sent by Samsung Mobile!

 

-------------= -----------------------------------------------------
Telecom Italia
Alessandro Gerardo D'Alessandro
Transport Innovation
Via Reiss Romoli, 274 - 10148 Torino
phone:  +39 011 228 5887
mobile: +39 335 766 9607
fax: +39 06 418 639 07

 <= /span>

Da: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stbryant@cisco.com] Inviato: marted=EC 28 aprile 2015 20:07
A: pals@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection@tools.iet= f.org
Oggetto: IPR review of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection

 

The authors of draft-ietf-pa= ls-ms-pw-protection have requested
that I make a WG last call on this draft. However following
established practice I first need to determine whether there
is any undisclosed IPR on this draft.

Authors, please reply to this message including the PALS WG
in the CC list indicating whether or not you know of any
not yet disclosed IPR that is applicable.

WG if you know of any IPR that is relevant please disclose it.

This poll will end 12 May 2015, or when I have heard from all
authors, which ever is later.

Thanks

Stewart

= Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle per= sone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigoro= samente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete= cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di pro= vvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie.

This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only.= Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. I= f you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any at= tachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.

3D"rispettaRispetta= l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non =E8 necessario.

--_000_22257C41A415324A984CD03D63344E2791527E28TELMBA002RM001t_-- --_9a7a85df-4544-44e3-8470-6862882bbdb5_ Content-Description: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: 00000000000000000000000000000003@TI.Disclaimer R0lGODlhGgAoANU5AEiFNnikNyRvNcvYOafCOEOEW3DO3jB2NqjGs9ny9o+zOIOrN+L1+G+ggbzo 8GCUN1SNNv///zx+NrPJOL/ROYPV44zY5YuzmrfQwCZxQlKNaMXZzOfy8NTi2TV6TuLs5vX8/ez5 +4yzmtTj2cXr8mCXdKni62ycN5/f6aDf6X2qjrPl7rLl7Zu6OJbb53nS4PH188bs8sXZzfH18pq9 p0SDWxhnNWbL3NfgOf///wAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACH5BAEAADkALAAAAAAaACgAAAb/wJxw SBQ6WMWkMmm6kZbQ5OvmjFoT1JuBYYWmsrcXqJvEgm8WctFypnI66pyjfXMhCmqGgR4r2S5dIBV0 FjI2h3BRX20VHAUCEjZ4UHNtFo42BA+HCEskbQYOIwU2CjgBNgAZM0kMbSYcIjYCBDg4LTYLf0V6 YCghNBk2DwO2OASZqkS9VBYMCB6pE8bGucidOYJUoaOptdQTFDg2ATgHGkIs2wyyAqbUtgICCwfl uh8ge1sNNhDF8LYiHYKAg4INBJUS8FsAEF6AA6lsHWjg4gYKDDZONGwIAIAtCAX2hPAgYSNHj6ds 3KiA8V3DAQGm2epoS4HKFQ0EmMRhc97Mwge2kN1IoIGgyQECD5wQUO6YygTkdtpCdSgqDl0VoDaV OmDBpm+oTCQoABQgBZfGbIrDAUBDAgcNDnDs98/WA504Buxa0RKgzVkB/h0oi+pDjgQhHtU1RgDi oY6l8gpAJyTBCBsSFtuC6XjWTBuJhIRAgFkmwAmoAkM4mCQCBmEB1sIDIKAFRGytYfDrt4CAuAkn qnrYYCXCBxGkqlYtgbtLhOcbMNSw0SBOEmg2VFj/sGHDhRLCNBC3fqFqARWhowQBADs= --_9a7a85df-4544-44e3-8470-6862882bbdb5_-- From nobody Wed Apr 29 18:53:03 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C6A1A906B for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 18:53:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GHs6GFRIWPRH for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 18:52:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58DD81A9053 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 18:52:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BRZ25047; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 01:52:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.37) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 02:52:55 +0100 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.135]) by nkgeml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.37]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 09:52:46 +0800 From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" To: Alexander Vainshtein , "Andrew G. Malis (agmalis@gmail.com)" , "Stewart Bryant (stbryant@cisco.com)" Thread-Topic: WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe Thread-Index: AdCCaMiQmpyu9SJ3QEGkCeDmOzBMuQAfDFLg Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 01:52:46 +0000 Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D0C55C@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.97.131] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D0C55Cnkgeml512mbxchi_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Cc: "pals@ietf.org" , "Wanghaibo \(Rainsword\)" Subject: Re: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 01:53:01 -0000 --_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D0C55Cnkgeml512mbxchi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sasha, Thanks a lot for your comments. I agree that to ensure interoperability, some or all of the SHOULD in secti= on 3 need to be replaced with MUST. As for the SPE bypass mode, what about adding the below texts in paragraph = 1 of section 3: "Note that when PW redundancy for MS-PW is provided on S-PE, the optional S= -PE Bypass Mode as defined in RFC 6478 MUST NOT be used. " If you agree, we will make the changes in a new revision. Best regards, Jie From: Alexander Vainshtein [mailto:Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 6:42 PM To: Andrew G. Malis (agmalis@gmail.com); Stewart Bryant (stbryant@cisco.com= ) Cc: Dongjie (Jimmy); Wanghaibo (Rainsword); pals@ietf.org Subject: Re: WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe Hi all, I have read the draft and I support requesting its publication from IESG. I have the following comments that should be resolved complete with other W= G LC comments: 1. The draft (in its current version) is intended for Proposed Standa= rd, but it does not contain any MUST/MUST NOT requirements. In particular, = all the requirements in Section 3 "SPE Operation" are marked as SHOULD. Fro= m my POV this may cause potential interoperability problems. I suggest to r= edefine some (possibly all) requirements in this section as MUST to avoid a= ny such issues. 2. The draft explicitly mentions MS-PWs with some (or even all) segme= nts being statically configured and presumably relies on static PW Status m= essages (as per RFC 6478) for carrying the Preferential Forwarding bit acro= ss static segments. However, RFC 6478 allows sending static PW status messa= ges also end-to-end (in the so-called SPE Bypass mode). This mode is clearl= y incompatible with the mechanism defined in the draft, and I suggest to me= ntion it explicitly to avoid any ambiguity. Hopefully these comments will be useful. Regards, Sasha Office: +972-39266302 Cell: +972-549266302 Email: Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com --_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D0C55Cnkgeml512mbxchi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Sasha,

 

Thanks a lot for your comments.

 

I agree that to ensure interoperability, some or all of the SHOUL= D in section 3 need to be replaced with MUST.

 

As for the SPE bypass mode, what about adding the below texts in = paragraph 1 of section 3:

 

“Note that when PW redundancy for MS-PW is provided on S-PE= , the optional S-PE Bypass Mode as defined in RFC 6478 MUST NOT be used. &#= 8221;

 

If you agree, we will make the changes in a new revision.

 

Best regards,

Jie

 

From: Alexander Vainshtein [mailto:Alexander.Vainshtein@eci= tele.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 6:42 PM
To: Andrew G. Malis (agmalis@gmail.com); Stewart Bryant (stbryant@ci= sco.com)
Cc: Dongjie (Jimmy); Wanghaibo (Rainsword); pals@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe

 

Hi all,

I have read the draft and I sup= port requesting its publication from IESG.

 

I have the following comments t= hat should be resolved complete with other WG LC comments:

 

1. &nbs= p;     The draft (in its curre= nt version) is intended for Proposed Standard, but it does not contain any = MUST/MUST NOT requirements. In particular, all the requirements in Section = 3 “SPE Operation” are marked as SHOULD. From my POV this may cause potential interoperability problems. I suggest = to redefine some (possibly all) requirements in this section as MUST to avo= id any such issues.

2. &nbs= p;     The draft explicitly me= ntions MS-PWs with some (or even all) segments being statically configured = and presumably relies on static PW Status messages (as per RFC 6478) for ca= rrying the Preferential Forwarding bit across static segments. However, RFC 6478 allows sending static PW sta= tus messages also end-to-end (in the so-called SPE Bypass mode). This mode = is clearly incompatible with the mechanism defined in the draft, and I sugg= est to mention it explicitly to avoid any ambiguity.

 

Hopefully these comments will b= e useful.

 

Regards,

Sasha

 

Office: +972-39266302<= /o:p>

Cell:    &n= bsp; +972-549266302

Email:   Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com

 

--_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D0C55Cnkgeml512mbxchi_-- From nobody Wed Apr 29 18:57:24 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAE31A9082 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 18:57:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 907mldQwiZPm for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 18:57:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88F001A9080 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 18:57:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BVM46036; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 01:57:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nkgeml407-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.38) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 02:57:16 +0100 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.135]) by nkgeml407-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 09:57:05 +0800 From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" To: "Andrew G. Malis" , Alexander Vainshtein Thread-Topic: WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe Thread-Index: AdCCaMiQmpyu9SJ3QEGkCeDmOzBMuf//qgkA//6q2yA= Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 01:57:04 +0000 Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D0C56A@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.97.131] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D0C56Ankgeml512mbxchi_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Cc: "Wanghaibo \(Rainsword\)" , "pals@ietf.org" , "Stewart Bryant \(stbryant@cisco.com\)" Subject: Re: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 01:57:22 -0000 --_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D0C56Ankgeml512mbxchi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGkgQW5keSwNCg0KVGhhbmtzIGEgbG90IGZvciB5b3VyIHN1Z2dlc3Rpb24uIEkganVzdCByZXBs aWVkIFNhc2hhIHdpdGggc29tZSB0ZXh0cyBzaW1pbGFyIHRvIHdoYXQgeW91IHN1Z2dlc3RlZC4g SG9wZSB0aGUgY29uc2lkZXJhdGlvbnMgb24gU1BFIGJ5cGFzcyBtb2RlIGNhbiBiZSBzb2x2ZWQg aW4gYm90aCBjYXNlcy4NCg0KQmVzdCByZWdhcmRzLA0KSmllDQoNCkZyb206IEFuZHJldyBHLiBN YWxpcyBbbWFpbHRvOmFnbWFsaXNAZ21haWwuY29tXQ0KU2VudDogV2VkbmVzZGF5LCBBcHJpbCAy OSwgMjAxNSA5OjMyIFBNDQpUbzogQWxleGFuZGVyIFZhaW5zaHRlaW4NCkNjOiBTdGV3YXJ0IEJy eWFudCAoc3RicnlhbnRAY2lzY28uY29tKTsgRG9uZ2ppZSAoSmltbXkpOyBXYW5naGFpYm8gKFJh aW5zd29yZCk7IHBhbHNAaWV0Zi5vcmcNClN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBXRyBMYXN0IENhbGwgLSBkcmFm dC1pZXRmLXBhbHMtcmVkdW5kYW5jeS1zcGUNCg0KUmVnYXJkaW5nIGNvbW1lbnQgMiwgU2FzaGEg aGFkIGEgc2ltaWxhciBjb21tZW50IGZvciBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLXBhbHMtbXMtcHctcHJvdGVjdGlv bi4gVGhlcmUsIEkgcmVzb2x2ZWQgdGhlIGNvbW1lbnQgYnkgYWRkaW5nIHRoZSB0ZXh0ICJOb3Rl IHRoYXQgdGhlIG9wdGlvbmFsIFMtUEUgQnlwYXNzIE1vZGUgZGVmaW5lZCBpbiBTZWN0aW9uIDUu NSBvZiBSRkMgNjQ3OCBjYW5ub3QgYmUgdXNlZCwgYXMgaXQgcmVxdWlyZXMgTERQIHNpZ25hbGlu Zy4iIFNpbWlsYXIgdGV4dCBjYW4gYmUgdXNlZCBoZXJlIGFzIHdlbGwuDQoNCkNoZWVycywNCkFu ZHkNCg0KDQpPbiBXZWQsIEFwciAyOSwgMjAxNSBhdCA2OjQxIEFNLCBBbGV4YW5kZXIgVmFpbnNo dGVpbiA8QWxleGFuZGVyLlZhaW5zaHRlaW5AZWNpdGVsZS5jb208bWFpbHRvOkFsZXhhbmRlci5W YWluc2h0ZWluQGVjaXRlbGUuY29tPj4gd3JvdGU6DQpIaSBhbGwsDQpJIGhhdmUgcmVhZCB0aGUg ZHJhZnQgYW5kIEkgc3VwcG9ydCByZXF1ZXN0aW5nIGl0cyBwdWJsaWNhdGlvbiBmcm9tIElFU0cu DQoNCkkgaGF2ZSB0aGUgZm9sbG93aW5nIGNvbW1lbnRzIHRoYXQgc2hvdWxkIGJlIHJlc29sdmVk IGNvbXBsZXRlIHdpdGggb3RoZXIgV0cgTEMgY29tbWVudHM6DQoNCg0KMS4gICAgICAgVGhlIGRy YWZ0IChpbiBpdHMgY3VycmVudCB2ZXJzaW9uKSBpcyBpbnRlbmRlZCBmb3IgUHJvcG9zZWQgU3Rh bmRhcmQsIGJ1dCBpdCBkb2VzIG5vdCBjb250YWluIGFueSBNVVNUL01VU1QgTk9UIHJlcXVpcmVt ZW50cy4gSW4gcGFydGljdWxhciwgYWxsIHRoZSByZXF1aXJlbWVudHMgaW4gU2VjdGlvbiAzIOKA nFNQRSBPcGVyYXRpb27igJ0gYXJlIG1hcmtlZCBhcyBTSE9VTEQuIEZyb20gbXkgUE9WIHRoaXMg bWF5IGNhdXNlIHBvdGVudGlhbCBpbnRlcm9wZXJhYmlsaXR5IHByb2JsZW1zLiBJIHN1Z2dlc3Qg dG8gcmVkZWZpbmUgc29tZSAocG9zc2libHkgYWxsKSByZXF1aXJlbWVudHMgaW4gdGhpcyBzZWN0 aW9uIGFzIE1VU1QgdG8gYXZvaWQgYW55IHN1Y2ggaXNzdWVzLg0KDQoyLiAgICAgICBUaGUgZHJh ZnQgZXhwbGljaXRseSBtZW50aW9ucyBNUy1QV3Mgd2l0aCBzb21lIChvciBldmVuIGFsbCkgc2Vn bWVudHMgYmVpbmcgc3RhdGljYWxseSBjb25maWd1cmVkIGFuZCBwcmVzdW1hYmx5IHJlbGllcyBv biBzdGF0aWMgUFcgU3RhdHVzIG1lc3NhZ2VzIChhcyBwZXIgUkZDIDY0NzgpIGZvciBjYXJyeWlu ZyB0aGUgUHJlZmVyZW50aWFsIEZvcndhcmRpbmcgYml0IGFjcm9zcyBzdGF0aWMgc2VnbWVudHMu IEhvd2V2ZXIsIFJGQyA2NDc4IGFsbG93cyBzZW5kaW5nIHN0YXRpYyBQVyBzdGF0dXMgbWVzc2Fn ZXMgYWxzbyBlbmQtdG8tZW5kIChpbiB0aGUgc28tY2FsbGVkIFNQRSBCeXBhc3MgbW9kZSkuIFRo aXMgbW9kZSBpcyBjbGVhcmx5IGluY29tcGF0aWJsZSB3aXRoIHRoZSBtZWNoYW5pc20gZGVmaW5l ZCBpbiB0aGUgZHJhZnQsIGFuZCBJIHN1Z2dlc3QgdG8gbWVudGlvbiBpdCBleHBsaWNpdGx5IHRv IGF2b2lkIGFueSBhbWJpZ3VpdHkuDQoNCkhvcGVmdWxseSB0aGVzZSBjb21tZW50cyB3aWxsIGJl IHVzZWZ1bC4NCg0KUmVnYXJkcywNClNhc2hhDQoNCk9mZmljZTogKzk3Mi0zOTI2NjMwMjx0ZWw6 JTJCOTcyLTM5MjY2MzAyPg0KQ2VsbDogICAgICArOTcyLTU0OTI2NjMwMjx0ZWw6JTJCOTcyLTU0 OTI2NjMwMj4NCkVtYWlsOiAgIEFsZXhhbmRlci5WYWluc2h0ZWluQGVjaXRlbGUuY29tPG1haWx0 bzpBbGV4YW5kZXIuVmFpbnNodGVpbkBlY2l0ZWxlLmNvbT4NCg0KDQo= --_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D0C56Ankgeml512mbxchi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWwgeG1sbnM6dj0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTp2bWwiIHhtbG5zOm89InVy bjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206b2ZmaWNlOm9mZmljZSIgeG1sbnM6dz0idXJuOnNjaGVt YXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6d29yZCIgeG1sbnM6bT0iaHR0cDovL3NjaGVtYXMubWlj cm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9vZmZpY2UvMjAwNC8xMi9vbW1sIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcv VFIvUkVDLWh0bWw0MCI+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIg Y29udGVudD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9IkdlbmVyYXRv ciIgY29udGVudD0iTWljcm9zb2Z0IFdvcmQgMTIgKGZpbHRlcmVkIG1lZGl1bSkiPg0KPHN0eWxl PjwhLS0NCi8qIEZvbnQgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6 5a6L5L2TOw0KCXBhbm9zZS0xOjIgMSA2IDAgMyAxIDEgMSAxIDE7fQ0KQGZvbnQtZmFjZQ0KCXtm b250LWZhbWlseToiQ2FtYnJpYSBNYXRoIjsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDQgNSAzIDUgNCA2IDMgMiA0 O30NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6Q2FsaWJyaTsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDE1IDUg MiAyIDIgNCAzIDIgNDt9DQpAZm9udC1mYWNlDQoJe2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OlRhaG9tYTsNCglwYW5v c2UtMToyIDExIDYgNCAzIDUgNCA0IDIgNDt9DQpAZm9udC1mYWNlDQoJe2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJc QOWui+S9kyI7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6MiAxIDYgMCAzIDEgMSAxIDEgMTt9DQovKiBTdHlsZSBEZWZp bml0aW9ucyAqLw0KcC5Nc29Ob3JtYWwsIGxpLk1zb05vcm1hbCwgZGl2Lk1zb05vcm1hbA0KCXtt YXJnaW46MGNtOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206LjAwMDFwdDsNCglmb250LXNpemU6MTIuMHB0Ow0K CWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OuWui+S9kzt9DQphOmxpbmssIHNwYW4uTXNvSHlwZXJsaW5rDQoJe21zby1z dHlsZS1wcmlvcml0eTo5OTsNCgljb2xvcjpibHVlOw0KCXRleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjp1bmRlcmxp bmU7fQ0KYTp2aXNpdGVkLCBzcGFuLk1zb0h5cGVybGlua0ZvbGxvd2VkDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1w cmlvcml0eTo5OTsNCgljb2xvcjpwdXJwbGU7DQoJdGV4dC1kZWNvcmF0aW9uOnVuZGVybGluZTt9 DQpwDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1wcmlvcml0eTo5OTsNCgltc28tbWFyZ2luLXRvcC1hbHQ6YXV0bzsN CgltYXJnaW4tcmlnaHQ6MGNtOw0KCW1zby1tYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tLWFsdDphdXRvOw0KCW1hcmdp bi1sZWZ0OjBjbTsNCglmb250LXNpemU6MTIuMHB0Ow0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OuWui+S9kzt9DQpz cGFuLkVtYWlsU3R5bGUxOA0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtdHlwZTpwZXJzb25hbC1yZXBseTsNCglmb250 LWZhbWlseToiQ2FsaWJyaSIsInNhbnMtc2VyaWYiOw0KCWNvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0Q7fQ0KLk1zb0No cERlZmF1bHQNCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXR5cGU6ZXhwb3J0LW9ubHk7fQ0KQHBhZ2UgV29yZFNlY3Rp b24xDQoJe3NpemU6NjEyLjBwdCA3OTIuMHB0Ow0KCW1hcmdpbjo3Mi4wcHQgOTAuMHB0IDcyLjBw dCA5MC4wcHQ7fQ0KZGl2LldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMQ0KCXtwYWdlOldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMTt9DQotLT48 L3N0eWxlPjwhLS1baWYgZ3RlIG1zbyA5XT48eG1sPg0KPG86c2hhcGVkZWZhdWx0cyB2OmV4dD0i ZWRpdCIgc3BpZG1heD0iMTAyNiIgLz4NCjwveG1sPjwhW2VuZGlmXS0tPjwhLS1baWYgZ3RlIG1z byA5XT48eG1sPg0KPG86c2hhcGVsYXlvdXQgdjpleHQ9ImVkaXQiPg0KPG86aWRtYXAgdjpleHQ9 ImVkaXQiIGRhdGE9IjEiIC8+DQo8L286c2hhcGVsYXlvdXQ+PC94bWw+PCFbZW5kaWZdLS0+DQo8 L2hlYWQ+DQo8Ym9keSBsYW5nPSJaSC1DTiIgbGluaz0iYmx1ZSIgdmxpbms9InB1cnBsZSI+DQo8 ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJXb3JkU2VjdGlvbjEiPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gbGFu Zz0iRU4tVVMiIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuNXB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NhbGli cmkmcXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZxdW90Oztjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj5IaSBBbmR5LA0K PG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0i RU4tVVMiIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuNXB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NhbGlicmkm cXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZxdW90Oztjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwv bzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyIg c3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC41cHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90Oywm cXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7O2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPlRoYW5rcyBhIGxvdCBmb3IgeW91 ciBzdWdnZXN0aW9uLiBJIGp1c3QgcmVwbGllZCBTYXNoYSB3aXRoIHNvbWUgdGV4dHMgc2ltaWxh ciB0byB3aGF0IHlvdSBzdWdnZXN0ZWQuIEhvcGUgdGhlIGNvbnNpZGVyYXRpb25zIG9uIFNQRSBi eXBhc3MgbW9kZQ0KIGNhbiBiZSBzb2x2ZWQgaW4gYm90aCBjYXNlcy48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bh bj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyIgc3R5bGU9ImZv bnQtc2l6ZToxMC41cHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5z LXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7O2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4N CjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXpl OjEwLjVwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYm cXVvdDs7Y29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+QmVzdCByZWdhcmRzLDxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4N CjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXpl OjEwLjVwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYm cXVvdDs7Y29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+SmllPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9 Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tVVMiIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuNXB0O2Zv bnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NhbGlicmkmcXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZxdW90Oztjb2xv cjojMUY0OTdEIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8ZGl2IHN0eWxlPSJib3Jk ZXI6bm9uZTtib3JkZXItbGVmdDpzb2xpZCBibHVlIDEuNXB0O3BhZGRpbmc6MGNtIDBjbSAwY20g NC4wcHQiPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXYgc3R5bGU9ImJvcmRlcjpub25lO2JvcmRlci10b3A6c29saWQg I0I1QzRERiAxLjBwdDtwYWRkaW5nOjMuMHB0IDBjbSAwY20gMGNtIj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29O b3JtYWwiPjxiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDtmb250 LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtUYWhvbWEmcXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZxdW90OyI+RnJvbTo8 L3NwYW4+PC9iPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDtmb250 LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtUYWhvbWEmcXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZxdW90OyI+IEFuZHJl dyBHLiBNYWxpcyBbbWFpbHRvOmFnbWFsaXNAZ21haWwuY29tXQ0KPGJyPg0KPGI+U2VudDo8L2I+ IFdlZG5lc2RheSwgQXByaWwgMjksIDIwMTUgOTozMiBQTTxicj4NCjxiPlRvOjwvYj4gQWxleGFu ZGVyIFZhaW5zaHRlaW48YnI+DQo8Yj5DYzo8L2I+IFN0ZXdhcnQgQnJ5YW50IChzdGJyeWFudEBj aXNjby5jb20pOyBEb25namllIChKaW1teSk7IFdhbmdoYWlibyAoUmFpbnN3b3JkKTsgcGFsc0Bp ZXRmLm9yZzxicj4NCjxiPlN1YmplY3Q6PC9iPiBSZTogV0cgTGFzdCBDYWxsIC0gZHJhZnQtaWV0 Zi1wYWxzLXJlZHVuZGFuY3ktc3BlPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rp dj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwv bzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0i RU4tVVMiPlJlZ2FyZGluZyBjb21tZW50IDIsIFNhc2hhIGhhZCBhIHNpbWlsYXIgY29tbWVudCBm b3ImbmJzcDtkcmFmdC1pZXRmLXBhbHMtbXMtcHctcHJvdGVjdGlvbi4gVGhlcmUsIEkgcmVzb2x2 ZWQgdGhlIGNvbW1lbnQgYnkgYWRkaW5nIHRoZSB0ZXh0ICZxdW90O05vdGUgdGhhdCB0aGUgb3B0 aW9uYWwgUy1QRSBCeXBhc3MgTW9kZSBkZWZpbmVkIGluIFNlY3Rpb24gNS41IG9mIFJGQyA2NDc4 IGNhbm5vdA0KIGJlIHVzZWQsIGFzIGl0IHJlcXVpcmVzIExEUCBzaWduYWxpbmcuJnF1b3Q7IFNp bWlsYXIgdGV4dCBjYW4gYmUgdXNlZCBoZXJlIGFzIHdlbGwuPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9w Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIj48bzpwPiZu YnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFs Ij48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyI+Q2hlZXJzLDxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2 Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIj5BbmR5PG86 cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+ PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tVVMiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0K PC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tVVMiPjxv OnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48 c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyI+T24gV2VkLCBBcHIgMjksIDIwMTUgYXQgNjo0MSBBTSwgQWxleGFu ZGVyIFZhaW5zaHRlaW4gJmx0OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpBbGV4YW5kZXIuVmFpbnNodGVpbkBl Y2l0ZWxlLmNvbSIgdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxhbmsiPkFsZXhhbmRlci5WYWluc2h0ZWluQGVjaXRlbGUu Y29tPC9hPiZndDsgd3JvdGU6PG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8 cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIiBzdHlsZT0ibXNvLW1hcmdpbi10b3AtYWx0OmF1dG87bXNvLW1h cmdpbi1ib3R0b20tYWx0OmF1dG8iPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIj5IaSBhbGwsPG86cD48L286 cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCIgc3R5bGU9Im1zby1tYXJnaW4tdG9w LWFsdDphdXRvO21zby1tYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tLWFsdDphdXRvIj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyI+ SSBoYXZlIHJlYWQgdGhlIGRyYWZ0IGFuZCBJIHN1cHBvcnQgcmVxdWVzdGluZyBpdHMgcHVibGlj YXRpb24gZnJvbSBJRVNHLjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3Jt YWwiIHN0eWxlPSJtc28tbWFyZ2luLXRvcC1hbHQ6YXV0bzttc28tbWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbS1hbHQ6 YXV0byI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tVVMiPiZuYnNwOzxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxw IGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiIHN0eWxlPSJtc28tbWFyZ2luLXRvcC1hbHQ6YXV0bzttc28tbWFy Z2luLWJvdHRvbS1hbHQ6YXV0byI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tVVMiPkkgaGF2ZSB0aGUgZm9sbG93 aW5nIGNvbW1lbnRzIHRoYXQgc2hvdWxkIGJlIHJlc29sdmVkIGNvbXBsZXRlIHdpdGggb3RoZXIg V0cgTEMgY29tbWVudHM6PG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1h bCIgc3R5bGU9Im1zby1tYXJnaW4tdG9wLWFsdDphdXRvO21zby1tYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tLWFsdDph dXRvIj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyI+Jm5ic3A7PG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHA+ PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tVVMiPjEuPC9zcGFuPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIiBzdHlsZT0iZm9u dC1zaXplOjcuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O1RpbWVzIE5ldyBSb21hbiZxdW90OywmcXVv dDtzZXJpZiZxdW90OyI+Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7DQo8L3Nw YW4+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tVVMiPlRoZSBkcmFmdCAoaW4gaXRzIGN1cnJlbnQgdmVyc2lvbikg aXMgaW50ZW5kZWQgZm9yIFByb3Bvc2VkIFN0YW5kYXJkLCBidXQgaXQgZG9lcyBub3QgY29udGFp biBhbnkgTVVTVC9NVVNUIE5PVCByZXF1aXJlbWVudHMuIEluIHBhcnRpY3VsYXIsIGFsbCB0aGUg cmVxdWlyZW1lbnRzIGluIFNlY3Rpb24gMyDigJxTUEUgT3BlcmF0aW9u4oCdIGFyZSBtYXJrZWQg YXMgU0hPVUxELiBGcm9tIG15IFBPViB0aGlzIG1heQ0KIGNhdXNlIHBvdGVudGlhbCBpbnRlcm9w ZXJhYmlsaXR5IHByb2JsZW1zLiBJIHN1Z2dlc3QgdG8gcmVkZWZpbmUgc29tZSAocG9zc2libHkg YWxsKSByZXF1aXJlbWVudHMgaW4gdGhpcyBzZWN0aW9uIGFzIE1VU1QgdG8gYXZvaWQgYW55IHN1 Y2ggaXNzdWVzLjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIj4y Ljwvc3Bhbj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZTo3LjBwdDtmb250LWZh bWlseTomcXVvdDtUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4mcXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2VyaWYmcXVvdDsiPiZuYnNw OyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOw0KPC9zcGFuPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVT Ij5UaGUgZHJhZnQgZXhwbGljaXRseSBtZW50aW9ucyBNUy1QV3Mgd2l0aCBzb21lIChvciBldmVu IGFsbCkgc2VnbWVudHMgYmVpbmcgc3RhdGljYWxseSBjb25maWd1cmVkIGFuZCBwcmVzdW1hYmx5 IHJlbGllcyBvbiBzdGF0aWMgUFcgU3RhdHVzIG1lc3NhZ2VzIChhcyBwZXIgUkZDIDY0NzgpIGZv ciBjYXJyeWluZyB0aGUgUHJlZmVyZW50aWFsIEZvcndhcmRpbmcgYml0IGFjcm9zcyBzdGF0aWMg c2VnbWVudHMuDQogSG93ZXZlciwgUkZDIDY0NzggYWxsb3dzIHNlbmRpbmcgc3RhdGljIFBXIHN0 YXR1cyBtZXNzYWdlcyBhbHNvIGVuZC10by1lbmQgKGluIHRoZSBzby1jYWxsZWQgU1BFIEJ5cGFz cyBtb2RlKS4gVGhpcyBtb2RlIGlzIGNsZWFybHkgaW5jb21wYXRpYmxlIHdpdGggdGhlIG1lY2hh bmlzbSBkZWZpbmVkIGluIHRoZSBkcmFmdCwgYW5kIEkgc3VnZ2VzdCB0byBtZW50aW9uIGl0IGV4 cGxpY2l0bHkgdG8gYXZvaWQgYW55IGFtYmlndWl0eS48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8 cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIiBzdHlsZT0ibXNvLW1hcmdpbi10b3AtYWx0OmF1dG87bXNvLW1h cmdpbi1ib3R0b20tYWx0OmF1dG8iPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIj4mbmJzcDs8bzpwPjwvbzpw Pjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIiBzdHlsZT0ibXNvLW1hcmdpbi10b3At YWx0OmF1dG87bXNvLW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b20tYWx0OmF1dG8iPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIj5I b3BlZnVsbHkgdGhlc2UgY29tbWVudHMgd2lsbCBiZSB1c2VmdWwuPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+ PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCIgc3R5bGU9Im1zby1tYXJnaW4tdG9wLWFsdDphdXRv O21zby1tYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tLWFsdDphdXRvIj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyI+Jm5ic3A7PG86 cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCIgc3R5bGU9Im1zby1tYXJn aW4tdG9wLWFsdDphdXRvO21zby1tYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tLWFsdDphdXRvIj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJF Ti1VUyI+UmVnYXJkcyw8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFs IiBzdHlsZT0ibXNvLW1hcmdpbi10b3AtYWx0OmF1dG87bXNvLW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b20tYWx0OmF1 dG8iPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIj5TYXNoYTxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNs YXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiIHN0eWxlPSJtc28tbWFyZ2luLXRvcC1hbHQ6YXV0bzttc28tbWFyZ2lu LWJvdHRvbS1hbHQ6YXV0byI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tVVMiPiZuYnNwOzxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9z cGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiIHN0eWxlPSJtc28tbWFyZ2luLXRvcC1hbHQ6 YXV0bzttc28tbWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbS1hbHQ6YXV0byI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tVVMiPk9mZmlj ZToNCjxhIGhyZWY9InRlbDolMkI5NzItMzkyNjYzMDIiIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj4mIzQzOzk3 Mi0zOTI2NjMwMjwvYT48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFs IiBzdHlsZT0ibXNvLW1hcmdpbi10b3AtYWx0OmF1dG87bXNvLW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b20tYWx0OmF1 dG8iPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIj5DZWxsOiZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNw Ow0KPGEgaHJlZj0idGVsOiUyQjk3Mi01NDkyNjYzMDIiIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj4mIzQzOzk3 Mi01NDkyNjYzMDI8L2E+PG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1h bCIgc3R5bGU9Im1zby1tYXJnaW4tdG9wLWFsdDphdXRvO21zby1tYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tLWFsdDph dXRvIj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyI+RW1haWw6Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7DQo8YSBocmVmPSJtYWls dG86QWxleGFuZGVyLlZhaW5zaHRlaW5AZWNpdGVsZS5jb20iIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj5BbGV4 YW5kZXIuVmFpbnNodGVpbkBlY2l0ZWxlLmNvbTwvYT48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8 cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIiBzdHlsZT0ibXNvLW1hcmdpbi10b3AtYWx0OmF1dG87bXNvLW1h cmdpbi1ib3R0b20tYWx0OmF1dG8iPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIj4mbmJzcDs8bzpwPjwvbzpw Pjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFs Ij48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+ DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9ib2R5Pg0KPC9odG1sPg0K --_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D0C56Ankgeml512mbxchi_-- From nobody Wed Apr 29 20:51:27 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5431A9134 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 20:51:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j0j917IB4CYp for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 20:51:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am1on0702.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe00::702]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFC181A912D for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 20:51:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from AM3PR03MB0775.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.211.139) by AM3PR03MB0773.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.210.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.148.16; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 03:51:04 +0000 Received: from AM3PR03MB0775.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.211.139]) by AM3PR03MB0775.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.211.139]) with mapi id 15.01.0148.008; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 03:51:04 +0000 From: Alexander Vainshtein To: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" , "Andrew G. Malis (agmalis@gmail.com)" , "Stewart Bryant (stbryant@cisco.com)" Thread-Topic: WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe Thread-Index: AQHQguhjpyCK2lqUvkaCQZg21D7WH51k64d0 Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 03:51:04 +0000 Message-ID: <1430365860280.58897@ecitele.com> References: , <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D0C55C@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92757D0C55C@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: huawei.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; x-originating-ip: [5.153.9.202] x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AM3PR03MB0773; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:AM3PR03MB0773; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:AM3PR03MB0773; x-forefront-prvs: 056297E276 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(377454003)(252514010)(53754006)(66066001)(2950100001)(46102003)(5001770100001)(16236675004)(2900100001)(5001960100002)(102836002)(54356999)(62966003)(77156002)(36756003)(86362001)(76176999)(2656002)(5001920100001)(87936001)(50986999)(19580395003)(19625215002)(92566002)(106116001)(40100003)(19580405001)(19627405001)(122556002)(117636001)(230783001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM3PR03MB0773; H:AM3PR03MB0775.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_143036586028058897ecitelecom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: ecitele.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Apr 2015 03:51:04.4733 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2c514a61-08de-4519-b4c0-921fef62c42a X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM3PR03MB0773 Archived-At: Cc: "pals@ietf.org" , "Wanghaibo \(Rainsword\)" Subject: Re: [Pals] WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 03:51:27 -0000 --_000_143036586028058897ecitelecom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ?Hi Jie, Looks as we are in sync regarding the changes. The text regarding non-usage of bypass SPE mode looks OK to me. I will be waiting for the new revision. Regards, Sasha ________________________________ From: Dongjie (Jimmy) Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 4:52 AM To: Alexander Vainshtein; Andrew G. Malis (agmalis@gmail.com); Stewart Brya= nt (stbryant@cisco.com) Cc: Wanghaibo (Rainsword); pals@ietf.org Subject: RE: WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe Hi Sasha, Thanks a lot for your comments. I agree that to ensure interoperability, some or all of the SHOULD in secti= on 3 need to be replaced with MUST. As for the SPE bypass mode, what about adding the below texts in paragraph = 1 of section 3: "Note that when PW redundancy for MS-PW is provided on S-PE, the optional S= -PE Bypass Mode as defined in RFC 6478 MUST NOT be used. " If you agree, we will make the changes in a new revision. Best regards, Jie From: Alexander Vainshtein [mailto:Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 6:42 PM To: Andrew G. Malis (agmalis@gmail.com); Stewart Bryant (stbryant@cisco.com= ) Cc: Dongjie (Jimmy); Wanghaibo (Rainsword); pals@ietf.org Subject: Re: WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe Hi all, I have read the draft and I support requesting its publication from IESG. I have the following comments that should be resolved complete with other W= G LC comments: 1. The draft (in its current version) is intended for Proposed Standa= rd, but it does not contain any MUST/MUST NOT requirements. In particular, = all the requirements in Section 3 "SPE Operation" are marked as SHOULD. Fro= m my POV this may cause potential interoperability problems. I suggest to r= edefine some (possibly all) requirements in this section as MUST to avoid a= ny such issues. 2. The draft explicitly mentions MS-PWs with some (or even all) segme= nts being statically configured and presumably relies on static PW Status m= essages (as per RFC 6478) for carrying the Preferential Forwarding bit acro= ss static segments. However, RFC 6478 allows sending static PW status messa= ges also end-to-end (in the so-called SPE Bypass mode). This mode is clearl= y incompatible with the mechanism defined in the draft, and I suggest to me= ntion it explicitly to avoid any ambiguity. Hopefully these comments will be useful. Regards, Sasha Office: +972-39266302 Cell: +972-549266302 Email: Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com --_000_143036586028058897ecitelecom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

​Hi Jie,

Looks as we are in sync regarding the changes.

The text regarding non-usage of bypass SPE mode looks OK to me.


I will be waiting for the new revision.


Regards,

Sasha

From: Dongjie (Jimmy) <= ;jie.dong@huawei.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 4:52 AM
To: Alexander Vainshtein; Andrew G. Malis (agmalis@gmail.com); Stewa= rt Bryant (stbryant@cisco.com)
Cc: Wanghaibo (Rainsword); pals@ietf.org
Subject: RE: WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe
 

= Hi Sasha,

=  

= Thanks a lot for your comments.

=  

= I agree that to ensure interoperability, some or all of the SHOULD in secti= on 3 need to be replaced with MUST.

=  

= As for the SPE bypass mode, what about adding the below texts in paragraph = 1 of section 3:

=  

= “Note that when PW redundancy for MS-PW is provided on S-PE, the opti= onal S-PE Bypass Mode as defined in RFC 6478 MUST NOT be used. ”

=  

= If you agree, we will make the changes in a new revision.

=  

= Best regards,

= Jie

=  

From: Alexander Vainshtein [mailto:Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 6:42 PM
To: Andrew G. Malis (agmalis@gmail.com); Stewart Bryant (stbryant@ci= sco.com)
Cc: Dongjie (Jimmy); Wanghaibo (Rainsword); pals@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe

 

Hi all,

I have read the draft and I support requesting its pub= lication from IESG.

 

I have the following comments that should be resolved = complete with other WG LC comments:

 

1.  &= nbsp;    The draft (in its current version= ) is intended for Proposed Standard, but it does not contain any MUST/MUST = NOT requirements. In particular, all the requirements in Section 3 “S= PE Operation” are marked as SHOULD. From my POV this may cause potential interoperability problems. I suggest to re= define some (possibly all) requirements in this section as MUST to avoid an= y such issues.

2.  &= nbsp;    The draft explicitly mentions MS-= PWs with some (or even all) segments being statically configured and presum= ably relies on static PW Status messages (as per RFC 6478) for carrying the= Preferential Forwarding bit across static segments. However, RFC 6478 allows sending static PW status message= s also end-to-end (in the so-called SPE Bypass mode). This mode is clearly = incompatible with the mechanism defined in the draft, and I suggest to ment= ion it explicitly to avoid any ambiguity.

 

Hopefully these comments will be useful.

 

Regards,

Sasha

 

Office: +972-39266302

Cell:      +972-549266302=

Email:   Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com

 

--_000_143036586028058897ecitelecom_--