From yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp Mon Feb 7 16:24:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pana@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: pana@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 623093A6C8B; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:24:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.089 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.089 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kP89SUzaSHxK; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:24:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from imx12.toshiba.co.jp (imx12.toshiba.co.jp [61.202.160.132]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4304D3A6B0A; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:24:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from arc11.toshiba.co.jp ([133.199.90.127]) by imx12.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id p180OoNn004793; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 09:24:50 +0900 (JST) Received: (from root@localhost) by arc11.toshiba.co.jp id p180Oojm018519; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 09:24:50 +0900 (JST) Received: from ovp11.toshiba.co.jp [133.199.90.148] by arc11.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id KAA18517; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 09:24:50 +0900 Received: from mx.toshiba.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ovp11.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id p180OotB006363; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 09:24:50 +0900 (JST) Received: from tsbpoa.po.toshiba.co.jp by toshiba.co.jp id p180OnFN001418; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 09:24:49 +0900 (JST) Received: from [133.199.75.42] by mail.po.toshiba.co.jp (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0LG9006F0VTBBL80@mail.po.toshiba.co.jp>; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:24:49 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:24:41 +0900 From: Yoshihiro Ohba To: "'Margaret Wasserman'" , Ralph Droms Message-id: <4D508D49.30208@toshiba.co.jp> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 Cc: secdir@ietf.org, draft-ohba-pana-relay@tools.ietf.org, Alan DeKok , pana@ietf.org Subject: [Pana] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ohba-pana-relay-03 X-BeenThere: pana@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol for carrying Authentication for Network Access List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 00:24:59 -0000 We have updated pana-relay draft, incorporating all received comments and associated discussions. Thanks, Yoshihiro Ohba -------- Original Message -------- Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ohba-pana-relay-03 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 23:13:23 -0800 (PST) From: IETF I-D Submission Tool To: yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp CC: paduffy@cisco.com, samitac2@gmail.com, robert.cragie@gridmerge.com, alper.yegin@yegin.org A new version of I-D, draft-ohba-pana-relay-03.txt has been successfully submitted by Yoshihiro Ohba and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-ohba-pana-relay Revision: 03 Title: Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA) Relay Element Creation_date: 2011-02-04 WG ID: Independent Submission Number_of_pages: 12 Abstract: This document specifies Protocol for carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA) Relay Element functionality which enables PANA messaging between a PANA Client (PaC) and a PANA Authentication Agent (PAA) where the two nodes cannot reach each other by means of regular IP routing. The IETF Secretariat. From yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp Tue Feb 15 08:07:00 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pana@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: pana@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288A23A6CD8 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:07:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.789 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.789 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.300, BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zWF+nUF+o9Qj for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:06:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from imx2.toshiba.co.jp (inet-tsb5.toshiba.co.jp [202.33.96.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 628413A6CB9 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:06:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from arc1.toshiba.co.jp ([133.199.194.235]) by imx2.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id p1FG7Iwx026483; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:07:18 +0900 (JST) Received: (from root@localhost) by arc1.toshiba.co.jp id p1FG7IMI021188; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:07:18 +0900 (JST) Received: from unknown [133.199.192.144] by arc1.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id BAA21187; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:07:18 +0900 Received: from mx.toshiba.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ovp2.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id p1FG7H1E002742; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:07:17 +0900 (JST) Received: from tsbpoa.po.toshiba.co.jp by toshiba.co.jp id p1FG7HU8027231; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:07:17 +0900 (JST) Received: from [133.199.75.182] by mail.po.toshiba.co.jp (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0LGO007KQ243VO10@mail.po.toshiba.co.jp>; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:07:17 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:07:03 +0900 From: Yoshihiro Ohba To: pana@ietf.org Message-id: <4D5AA4A7.3050104@toshiba.co.jp> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 Cc: Ralph Droms Subject: [Pana] PANA relay implementation status X-BeenThere: pana@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol for carrying Authentication for Network Access List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:07:00 -0000 I would like to note that PANA relay (and RFC 5191 of course) is being implemented by a couple of ZigBee vendors and showing successful interoperability in ZigBee IP mesh networking environment. I guess this is something people on this ML wanted to know. Regards, Yoshihiro Ohba From hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net Tue Feb 15 08:13:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pana@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: pana@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87713A6B3B for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:13:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gXUFWr3YSBOo for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:13:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 76A653A6AA6 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:13:27 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2011 16:13:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [10.255.132.229]) [192.100.123.77] by mail.gmx.net (mp047) with SMTP; 15 Feb 2011 17:13:52 +0100 X-Authenticated: #29516787 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19yMwo8H7NyFxGYAprq8GiY5btLJ2baYEx9qG5zsE hIUVmPKCUHSpy5 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Hannes Tschofenig In-Reply-To: <4D5AA4A7.3050104@toshiba.co.jp> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:13:48 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1930AD96-E636-49FF-BF2E-AE66F6C831B0@gmx.net> References: <4D5AA4A7.3050104@toshiba.co.jp> To: Yoshihiro Ohba X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Ralph Droms , Hannes Tschofenig , pana@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pana] PANA relay implementation status X-BeenThere: pana@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol for carrying Authentication for Network Access List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:13:29 -0000 Thank you, Yoshi. This is good news! On Feb 15, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Yoshihiro Ohba wrote: > I would like to note that PANA relay (and RFC 5191 of course) is > being implemented by a couple of ZigBee vendors and showing successful > interoperability in ZigBee IP mesh networking environment. > > I guess this is something people on this ML wanted to know. > > Regards, > Yoshihiro Ohba > _______________________________________________ > Pana mailing list > Pana@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana From Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com Tue Feb 15 10:12:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pana@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: pana@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D363A69A6 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:12:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vKm9znMOeV+c for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:12:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mgw-sa02.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.1.48]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA913A6D2A for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:12:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh102.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.23]) by mgw-sa02.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p1FICgCg029984; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:12:54 +0200 Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.7]) by vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:12:48 +0200 Received: from 008-AM1MMR1-003.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.58) by NOK-AM1MHUB-03.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.255.0; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 19:12:47 +0100 Received: from 008-AM1MPN1-006.mgdnok.nokia.com ([169.254.6.11]) by 008-AM1MMR1-003.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.58]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.002; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 19:12:47 +0100 From: To: , Thread-Topic: [Pana] PANA relay implementation status Thread-Index: AQHLzSqI9RjS7XUzI0yMO/E6plJxyJQCaDWA Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:12:45 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4D5AA4A7.3050104@toshiba.co.jp> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.0.101115 x-originating-ip: [172.19.59.135] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <9D031F1F3FEFC345A604E20104C8BF76@nokia.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Feb 2011 18:12:48.0126 (UTC) FILETIME=[F37189E0:01CBCD3B] X-Nokia-AV: Clean Cc: rdroms@cisco.com Subject: Re: [Pana] PANA relay implementation status X-BeenThere: pana@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol for carrying Authentication for Network Access List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:12:33 -0000 Thanks Yoshi. Very good to hear this. -Raj On 2/15/11 10:07 AM, "ext Yoshihiro Ohba" wrote: >I would like to note that PANA relay (and RFC 5191 of course) is >being implemented by a couple of ZigBee vendors and showing successful >interoperability in ZigBee IP mesh networking environment. > >I guess this is something people on this ML wanted to know. > >Regards, >Yoshihiro Ohba >_______________________________________________ >Pana mailing list >Pana@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana