Subject: Re: [payload] Call for adoption (was Re: draft-weaver-payload-rtp-vc2hq-01)

From: "Ali C. Begen" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 17:21:28 +0300

Looks like there was a good support for this draft and no objection.

James, please go ahead and submit the WG version of the draft.

-acbegen

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Ali C. Begen <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Hi everyone
>
> Please have a look at the draft and let the list know whether you support
> the adoption by the Payload WG or not. There has been support from two
> individual so far, but let's see what the rest of the working group thinks.
> Please respond by Friday June 3rd.
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-weaver-payload-rtp-vc2hq-01
>
> -acbegen
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:29 PM, James Barrett <[email-masked]>
> wrote:
>
>> What would be the best way to start going about getting a call for
>> adoption for draft-weaver-payload-rtp-vc2hq-01? The draft hasn’t spawned
>> much commentary on the list at this point, and no direct issues in need of
>> addressing that I’m aware of. It might be useful to get it (or a subsequent
>> version) put on the agenda for the July meeting.
>>
>> --
>> James P. Weaver (né Barrett)
>> Research Engineer
>> BBC R&D North Lab,
>> Floor 5 Dock House, MediaCity,
>> M50 2LH
>> Tel: +44(0)30 3040-9521
>> e-mail: [email-masked]
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> payload mailing list
>> [email-masked]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload
>>
>
>