From root@core3.amsl.com Tue Feb 2 10:00:01 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietf.org Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 8A1373A6856; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:00:01 -0800 (PST) From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart" Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20100202180001.8A1373A6856@core3.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:00:01 -0800 (PST) Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-07.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:00:01 -0000 --NextPart A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF. Title : Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths Author(s) : Q. Zhao, et al. Filename : draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-07.txt Pages : 31 Date : 2010-02-02 Point-to-point Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSPs) may be established using signaling techniques, but their paths may first need to be determined. The Path Computation Element (PCE) has been identified as an appropriate technology for the determination of the paths of P2MP TE LSPs. This document describes extensions to the PCE communication Protocol (PCEP) to handle requests and responses for the computation of paths for P2MP TE LSPs. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-07.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft. --NextPart Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-07.txt"; site="ftp.ietf.org"; access-type="anon-ftp"; directory="internet-drafts" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <2010-02-02094850.I-D@ietf.org> --NextPart-- From daniel@olddog.co.uk Tue Feb 2 10:14:51 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D6A3A6B31 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:14:50 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DC8Qb2CIeZOo for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:14:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9777C28C10F for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:14:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o12IF8oE019613 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:15:13 GMT Received: from Serenity (88-97-23-122.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.97.23.122]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o12IF72k019604 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:15:08 GMT From: "Daniel King" To: References: <20100202174850.D39F13A6975@core3.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20100202174850.D39F13A6975@core3.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:15:10 -0000 Message-ID: <000701caa433$a8ce7330$fa6b5990$@co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcqkMBkZCHi92vvWT1WeMM42qOZiwQAACgrw Content-Language: en-gb Subject: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-07 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:14:51 -0000 Hi All,=20 This new version of our draft incorporates a number of minor updates, = specifically: - Updated Trust Legal Provisions as per Dec 28 (2009) bulletin.=20 - Clearer introductory text - Slightly expanded Section 3.1.1 (P2MP Computation TLV in the Existing = PCE Discovery Protocol)=09 - Clearer text for the Efficient Presentation of P2MP LSPs - Plus a few minor nits and comments Special thanks to Adrian for his review! Br, pcep-p2mp-extensions authors -----Original Message----- From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of = Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Sent: 02 February 2010 18:00 To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-07.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts = directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group = of the IETF. Title : Extensions to the Path Computation Element = Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Point-to-Multipoint Traffic = Engineering Label Switched Paths Author(s) : Q. Zhao, et al. Filename : draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-07.txt Pages : 31 Date : 2010-02-02 Point-to-point Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS = (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSPs) may be = established using signaling techniques, but their paths may first need = to be determined. The Path Computation Element (PCE) has been = identified as an appropriate technology for the determination of the = paths of P2MP TE LSPs. This document describes extensions to the PCE communication Protocol (PCEP) to handle requests and responses for the computation of paths for = P2MP TE LSPs. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-0= 7.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader = implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the = Internet-Draft. From jvasseur@cisco.com Wed Feb 3 09:48:36 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699EF28C110 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:48:36 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.439 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.439 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.159, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id USlXcGTYlJ+A for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:48:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5FC328C186 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:48:28 -0800 (PST) Authentication-Results: sj-iport-6.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApgFAGJFaUurR7Ht/2dsb2JhbACBbL5OmBaERQQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,399,1262563200"; d="scan'208,217";a="477603245" Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com ([171.71.177.237]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2010 17:49:11 +0000 Received: from xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com [72.163.63.9]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o13HnBJH027247 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 17:49:11 GMT Received: from xfe-rcd-102.cisco.com ([72.163.62.137]) by xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:49:11 -0600 Received: from ams-jvasseur-8712.cisco.com ([10.55.201.131]) by xfe-rcd-102.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:49:10 -0600 Message-Id: <40A1847B-945E-4DED-B181-8E1A17798513@cisco.com> From: JP Vasseur To: pce@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-420--850658730 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 18:49:09 +0100 References: <20100203173153.864F928C0F7@core3.amsl.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2010 17:49:10.0657 (UTC) FILETIME=[30D52F10:01CAA4F9] Subject: [Pce] Fwd: Revised Guidelines to Authors of Internet-Drafts X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:48:36 -0000 --Apple-Mail-420--850658730 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Begin forwarded message: > From: IESG Secretary > Date: February 3, 2010 6:31:53 PM CEST > To: IETF Announcement list > Subject: Revised Guidelines to Authors of Internet-Drafts > > An updated version of the Guidelines to Authors of Internet-Drafts > is now > available and has been posted on the IETF website: > > http://www.ietf.org/id-info/guidelines.html OR > http://www.ietf.org/id-info/1id-guidelines.txt > > Summary of changes in this version: > > o Update the references to reflect the current BCPs. Remove the > reference to rfc2333bis, which is no longer an active work item. > Add a references for the I-D Submission Tool and the Data Tracker. > > o Rewrite of Section 3. > > o Structure the choices in Section 4 to match the current BCPs. > > o Provide two boilerplate options in Section 5, as approved by the > IESG on 7 January 2010. > > o Remove the discussion of grace period from Section 7. With the > I-D Submission Tool, there is no longer a need for one. > > o Include URLs that are not redirected. > > o Significant editorial changes. > _______________________________________________ > IETF-Announce mailing list > IETF-Announce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce --Apple-Mail-420--850658730 Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Begin = forwarded message:

From: = IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Date: February 3, 2010 6:31:53 PM = CEST
To: IETF Announcement list <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Subject: Revised Guidelines to Authors of = Internet-Drafts 

An updated = version of the Guidelines to Authors of Internet-Drafts is = now
available and has been posted on the IETF website:

=  http://www.ietf.org/i= d-info/guidelines.html  OR
 http://www.ietf.or= g/id-info/1id-guidelines.txt

Summary of changes in this = version:

o Update the references to reflect the current BCPs. = Remove the
 reference to rfc2333bis, which is no longer an = active work item.
 Add a references for the I-D Submission Tool = and the Data Tracker.

o Rewrite of Section 3.

o Structure = the choices in Section 4 to match the current BCPs.

o Provide two = boilerplate options in Section 5, as approved by the
 IESG on 7 = January 2010.

o Remove the discussion of grace period from = Section 7. With the
 I-D Submission Tool, there is no longer a = need for one.

o Include URLs that are not redirected.

o = Significant editorial = changes.
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announ= ce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https= ://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce

= --Apple-Mail-420--850658730-- From jvasseur@cisco.com Thu Feb 4 08:40:51 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D257F3A6A1F for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:40:51 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -9.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.998, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GhZN9ybcypl9 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:40:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A29A3A69ED for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:40:49 -0800 (PST) Authentication-Results: ams-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsMAAKeHakuQ/uCWe2dsb2JhbACBbJlkAQEWJAakApgDhEwE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,405,1262563200"; d="scan'208,217";a="56788968" Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.150]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Feb 2010 16:41:35 +0000 Received: from xbh-ams-201.cisco.com (xbh-ams-201.cisco.com [144.254.75.7]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o14GfZJk028364 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:41:35 GMT Received: from xfe-ams-101.cisco.com ([144.254.231.93]) by xbh-ams-201.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:41:35 +0100 Received: from ams-jvasseur-8712.cisco.com ([10.55.201.131]) by xfe-ams-101.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:41:34 +0100 Message-Id: <0726760D-7B12-432E-9F6F-28B43749BD1C@cisco.com> From: JP Vasseur To: pce@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-499--768314353 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:41:34 +0100 References: <000701caa433$a8ce7330$fa6b5990$@co.uk> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Feb 2010 16:41:34.0651 (UTC) FILETIME=[E9AD88B0:01CAA5B8] Subject: [Pce] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-07 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:40:52 -0000 --Apple-Mail-499--768314353 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear all, Thanks to the authors for the work. This starts a WG Last call on "draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-07" that will end on Feb 19, noon ET. Please send your comments to the authors and copy the mailing list. Thanks. JP. Begin forwarded message: > From: "Daniel King" > Date: February 2, 2010 7:15:10 PM CEST > To: > Subject: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp- > extensions-07 > > Hi All, > > This new version of our draft incorporates a number of minor > updates, specifically: > > - Updated Trust Legal Provisions as per Dec 28 (2009) bulletin. > - Clearer introductory text > - Slightly expanded Section 3.1.1 (P2MP Computation TLV in the > Existing PCE Discovery Protocol) > - Clearer text for the Efficient Presentation of P2MP LSPs > - Plus a few minor nits and comments > > Special thanks to Adrian for his review! > > Br, pcep-p2mp-extensions authors > > -----Original Message----- > From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Internet-Drafts@ietf.org > Sent: 02 February 2010 18:00 > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > Cc: pce@ietf.org > Subject: [Pce] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-07.txt > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working > Group of the IETF. > > > Title : Extensions to the Path Computation Element > Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Point-to-Multipoint Traffic > Engineering Label Switched Paths > Author(s) : Q. Zhao, et al. > Filename : draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-07.txt > Pages : 31 > Date : 2010-02-02 > > Point-to-point Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized > MPLS (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSPs) may > be established using signaling techniques, but their paths may first > need to be determined. The Path Computation Element (PCE) has been > identified as an appropriate technology for the determination of the > paths of P2MP TE LSPs. > > This document describes extensions to the PCE communication Protocol > (PCEP) to handle requests and responses for the computation of paths > for P2MP TE LSPs. > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-07.txt > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader > implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the > Internet-Draft. > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce --Apple-Mail-499--768314353 Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear = all,

Thanks to the authors for the = work.

This starts a WG Last call on = "draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-07" that will end on Feb 19, noon = ET. Please send your comments to the authors and copy the mailing = list.

Thanks.

JP.

Begin forwarded message:

From: = "Daniel King" <daniel@olddog.co.uk>
Date: = February 2, 2010 7:15:10 PM CEST
Subject: = [Pce] New Version Notification for = draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-07

Hi All, =

This new version of our draft incorporates a number of minor = updates, specifically:

- Updated Trust Legal Provisions as per = Dec 28 (2009) bulletin.
- Clearer introductory text
- Slightly = expanded Section 3.1.1 (P2MP Computation TLV in the Existing PCE = Discovery Protocol)
- Clearer text for the = Efficient Presentation of P2MP LSPs
- Plus a few minor nits and = comments

Special thanks to Adrian for his review!

Br, = pcep-p2mp-extensions authors

-----Original Message-----
From: = pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On = Behalf Of Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
S= ent: 02 February 2010 18:00
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: = pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] I-D = Action:draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-07.txt

A New = Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts = directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation = Element Working Group of the IETF.


Title =           : Extensions = to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for = Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths
Author(s) =       : Q. Zhao, et al.
Filename =        : = draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-07.txt
Pages =           : = 31
= Date =            : = 2010-02-02

Point-to-point Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) = and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths = (TE LSPs) may be established using signaling techniques, but their paths = may first need to be determined.  The Path Computation Element = (PCE) has been identified as an appropriate technology for the = determination of the paths of P2MP TE LSPs.

This document = describes extensions to the PCE communication Protocol
(PCEP) to = handle requests and responses for the computation of paths for P2MP TE = LSPs.

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp= -extensions-07.txt

Internet-Drafts are also available by = anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-d= rafts/

Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant = mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version = of the = Internet-Draft.

_______________________________________________
= Pce mailing = list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

= --Apple-Mail-499--768314353-- From qzhao@huawei.com Thu Feb 4 16:38:48 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6253A689F for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:38:48 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.309 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.309 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX=1.69, J_CHICKENPOX_52=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DMXdhiXvH+mt for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:38:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from usaga02-in.huawei.com (usaga02-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA43A3A67A4 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:38:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from huawei.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by usaga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KXC00GWYF5WW6@usaga02-in.huawei.com> for pce@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:39:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from Z73671a ([10.192.21.54]) by usaga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KXC0037FF5VTD@usaga02-in.huawei.com> for pce@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:39:32 -0800 (PST) From: Quintin Zhao To: pce@ietf.org Message-id: <000d01ca8d9f$8ce8e470$3615c00a@china.huawei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: Acql+20lXLGkLg6uRRGGbaRpjzVjhgYXBPQQ Subject: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-03 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:38:48 -0000 X-Original-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:39:27 -0500 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:38:48 -0000 PCE'rs, The authors of draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures have posted a new version. This version includes the following updates: - Clarification of work and update of Abstract; - Reordered and cleaned up Introduction text; - Cleaned up Terminology; - Expanded Problem Statement and added some requirements; - Cleaned up Definition of X-VSPT. We have made more corrections throughout the document and updated the references. Thank you! Quintin -----Original Message----- From: IETF I-D Submission Tool [mailto:idsubmission@ietf.org] Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 7:37 PM To: qzhao@huawei.com Cc: zali@cisco.com; tsaad@cisco.com; daniel@olddog.co.uk; david.Amzallag@bt.com; fabien.verhaeghe@gmail.com; ke-kumaki@kddi.com Subject: New Version Notification for draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-03 A new version of I-D, draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-03.txt has been successfuly submitted by Quintin Zhao and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures Revision: 03 Title: PCE-based Computation Procedure To Compute Shortest Constrained P2MP Inter-domain Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths Creation_date: 2010-02-04 WG ID: Independent Submission Number_of_pages: 20 Abstract: The ability to compute paths for constrained point-to-multipoint (P2MP) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths(TE LSPs) across multiple domains has been identified as a key requirement for the deployment of P2MP services in MPLS and GMPLS networks. The Path Computation Element (PCE) has been recognized as an appropriate technology for the determination of inter-domain paths of P2MP TE LSPs. This document describes the procedures and extensions to the PCE communication Protocol (PCEP) to handle requests and responses for the computation of inter-domain paths for P2MP TE LSPs. The IETF Secretariat. From dhruvd@huawei.com Sun Feb 7 21:25:18 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA853A6B45 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2010 21:25:18 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H6xJW1qa9jxw for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2010 21:25:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.67]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355B03A682E for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2010 21:25:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KXI00874CFMXQ@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for pce@ietf.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:26:10 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KXI00IIMCFM94@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for pce@ietf.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:26:10 +0800 (CST) Received: from BLRNSHTIPL1NC ([10.18.1.31]) by szxml04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KXI00943CFKPW@szxml04-in.huawei.com> for pce@ietf.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:26:10 +0800 (CST) Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:56:08 +0530 From: Dhruv Dhody To: rbradfor@cisco.com, jpv@cisco.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk Message-id: <000001caa87f$38c359c0$1f01120a@china.huawei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.3168 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_L0HBaj6y0AxOeuIoYbJAdA)" Thread-index: AcqofzfJPNrF/+YlSWiaO2LhHvbUbA== Cc: govindappasy@huawei.com, pce@ietf.org, qiss@huawei.com Subject: [Pce] Comments on draft-ietf-pce-path-key X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:25:18 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_L0HBaj6y0AxOeuIoYbJAdA) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Dear Authors, Kindly find following comments with respect to Path-Key draft. PathKey and Hop-Count Hop count is needed during the inter-domain best path computation when HOP LIMIT constraint is given. Using the ERO Object length one can easily find the hop-count. But if PCRep message has the 'Path Key Subobject' present in the PCEP ERO then there is no way to find the actual hop-count at PCE (1) because the actual hops are replaced with a path key. Suggestion: If path key exists in the ERO Object, it should be followed by TWO metric objects. The first metric object carries the metric value of the CPS .Metric type of this object is TE/IGP which was received in the path request. So in case of path key exists the second metric object carries Hopcount of the CPS. Metric type of this object is Type 3 - Hop Counts Error Handling In RP Object, if the path-key flag is set and there is no Path-key Object included in PCReq message, then the receiving PCEP Peer MUST trigger the Error message with Error Type 6 , Error Value 4 to set PATH-KEY object missing. Thanks & Regards, Dhruv Dhody Huawei Technologies India Pvt. Ltd, Bangalore, India **************************************************************************** *********** This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient's) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! --Boundary_(ID_L0HBaj6y0AxOeuIoYbJAdA) Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

Dear Authors,

 

Kindly find following comments with respect to = Path-Key draft.

 

PathKey and Hop-Count =

Hop count is needed during the inter-domain best = path computation when HOP LIMIT constraint is given.

Using the ERO Object length one can easily find the hop-count.

But if PCRep message has the ‘Path Key = Subobject’ present in the PCEP ERO then there is no way to find the actual = hop-count at PCE (1) because the actual hops are replaced with a path key. =

Suggestion: If path key exists in = the ERO Object, it should be followed by TWO metric = objects.

The first metric object carries the metric value of = the CPS .Metric type of this object is TE/IGP which was received in the path request. So in case of path key exists the second metric object carries Hopcount of the CPS. Metric type of this object is Type 3 - Hop = Counts

 

Error = Handling

In RP Object, if the path-key flag is set and there = is no Path-key Object included in PCReq message, then the receiving PCEP Peer = MUST trigger the Error message with Error Type 6 , Error Value 4 to set = PATH-KEY object missing.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Dhruv Dhody

Huawei Technologies India Pvt. = Ltd,

Bangalore, India<= /p>

 

 

**************************************************= *************************************
This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, = which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. = Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not = limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons = other than the intended recipient's) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail = in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete = it!

 

--Boundary_(ID_L0HBaj6y0AxOeuIoYbJAdA)-- From adrian@olddog.co.uk Mon Feb 8 02:52:50 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A193A7021 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 02:52:50 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.319 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.319 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.279, BAYES_00=-2.599, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6F3sSn2vocsx for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 02:52:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (asmtp1.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.248]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF4C3A67C1 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 02:52:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o18ArIto009027; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:53:18 GMT Received: from your029b8cecfe (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o18ArBwq009005; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:53:14 GMT Message-ID: <7A8FFD9AC0524248AB13D3768CE6D3EE@your029b8cecfe> From: "Adrian Farrel" To: "Dhruv Dhody" , , References: <000001caa87f$38c359c0$1f01120a@china.huawei.com> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:52:45 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Cc: govindappasy@huawei.com, pce@ietf.org, qiss@huawei.com Subject: Re: [Pce] Comments on draft-ietf-pce-path-key X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: Adrian Farrel List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:52:50 -0000 Hi Dhruv, > Kindly find following comments with respect to Path-Key draft. Heads-up that this has been RFC 5520 since April 2009. > PathKey and Hop-Count > > Hop count is needed during the inter-domain best path computation when HOP > LIMIT constraint is given. > > Using the ERO Object length one can easily find the hop-count. > > But if PCRep message has the 'Path Key Subobject' present in the PCEP ERO > then there is no way to find the actual hop-count at PCE (1) because the > actual hops are replaced with a path key. > > Suggestion: If path key exists in the ERO Object, it should be followed by > TWO metric objects. > > The first metric object carries the metric value of the CPS .Metric type > of > this object is TE/IGP which was received in the path request. So in case > of > path key exists the second metric object carries Hopcount of the CPS. > Metric > type of this object is Type 3 - Hop Counts The example you give of hop-count being deduced from an explicit ERO is an example of why hop count is a special metric. But when we do constraint-based computations, hop-count is *usually* less important than other metrics. And you should notice that even without and PKS, we cannot know the per-hop values of the other metrics for a returned ERO. But that is OK, because we do not need to know this! We are only interested in the net metrics for the path fragment returned in the PCRep. That is, we need to know the cumulative effect of including this fragment in the whole path. PCEP already provides this by allowing the METRIC object on the PCRep message with the semntic that it applies to the whole path fragment. > Error Handling > > In RP Object, if the path-key flag is set and there is no Path-key Object > included in PCReq message, then the receiving PCEP Peer MUST trigger the > Error message with Error Type 6 , Error Value 4 to set PATH-KEY object > missing. Yes, this would be correct behaviour. Cheers, Adrian From jvasseur@cisco.com Tue Feb 9 21:37:34 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C7928C0EE for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 21:37:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -9.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.999, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0amGkoj5D+sL for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 21:37:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483543A7442 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 21:37:33 -0800 (PST) Authentication-Results: sj-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArcFABHVcUutJV2c/2dsb2JhbACBRpkfdKRymC6EVQQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,441,1262563200"; d="scan'208,217";a="297708025" Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Feb 2010 05:38:42 +0000 Received: from xbh-ams-101.cisco.com (xbh-ams-101.cisco.com [144.254.74.71]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1A5cfGU013235 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:38:41 GMT Received: from xfe-ams-202.cisco.com ([144.254.231.96]) by xbh-ams-101.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:38:41 +0100 Received: from [10.108.68.111] ([10.55.94.216]) by xfe-ams-202.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:38:40 +0100 Message-Id: <180C714D-DE46-464E-9271-1DC2B2E50D16@cisco.com> From: JP Vasseur To: pce@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-97--289688041 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:38:40 +0100 References: <20100210001234.48C7A28C104@core3.amsl.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Feb 2010 05:38:40.0860 (UTC) FILETIME=[4D2129C0:01CAAA13] Subject: [Pce] Fwd: Revised Guidelines to Authors of Internet-Drafts X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:37:34 -0000 --Apple-Mail-97--289688041 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit FYI Begin forwarded message: > From: IESG Secretary > Date: February 10, 2010 1:12:34 AM CEST > To: IETF Announcement list > Subject: Revised Guidelines to Authors of Internet-Drafts > > An updated version of the Guidelines to Authors of Internet-Drafts > is now > available and has been posted on the IETF website: > > http://www.ietf.org/id-info/guidelines.html OR > http://www.ietf.org/id-info/1id-guidelines.txt > > Summary of changes in this version: > > o Correct the typographical errors in the excerpts from the Trust > License Policy (TLP) in Section 4. > _______________________________________________ > IETF-Announce mailing list > IETF-Announce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce --Apple-Mail-97--289688041 Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable FYI

Begin = forwarded message:

From: = IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Date: February 10, 2010 1:12:34 AM = CEST
To: IETF Announcement list <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Subject: Revised Guidelines to Authors of = Internet-Drafts 

An updated = version of the Guidelines to Authors of Internet-Drafts is = now
available and has been posted on the IETF website:

=  http://www.ietf.org/i= d-info/guidelines.html  OR
 http://www.ietf.or= g/id-info/1id-guidelines.txt

Summary of changes in this = version:

o Correct the typographical errors in the excerpts from = the Trust
License Policy (TLP) in Section = 4.
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce = mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https= ://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce

= --Apple-Mail-97--289688041-- From root@core3.amsl.com Wed Feb 10 13:45:02 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietf.org Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 57A7D3A7603; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:45:02 -0800 (PST) From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart" Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20100210214502.57A7D3A7603@core3.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:45:02 -0800 (PST) Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pce-pcep-svec-list-04.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:45:02 -0000 --NextPart A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF. Title : The use of SVEC (Synchronization VECtor) list for Synchronized dependent path computations Author(s) : I. Nishioka, D. King Filename : draft-ietf-pce-pcep-svec-list-04.txt Pages : 17 Date : 2010-02-10 A Path Computation Element (PCE) may be required to perform dependent path computations. Dependent path computations are requests that need to be synchronized in order to meet specific objectives. An example of a dependent request would be a PCE computing a set of services which are required to be diverse (disjointed) from each other. When a PCE computes sets of dependent path computation requests concurrently, it is required to use the Synchronization VECtor (SVEC) list for association among the sets of dependent path computation requests. The SVEC object is optional and carried within the Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) PCRequest (PCReq) message. This document does not specify the PCEP SVEC object or procedure. This informational document clarifies the use of the SVEC list for synchronized path computations when computing dependent requests. The document also describes a number of usage scenarios for SVEC lists within single domain and multi-domain environments. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-svec-list-04.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft. --NextPart Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="draft-ietf-pce-pcep-svec-list-04.txt"; site="ftp.ietf.org"; access-type="anon-ftp"; directory="internet-drafts" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <2010-02-10133724.I-D@ietf.org> --NextPart-- From daniel@olddog.co.uk Wed Feb 10 13:51:23 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FEEE3A77BF for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:51:23 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xrJoGmFZCW34 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:51:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.159]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169173A77BD for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:51:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1ALqHI7025709 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:52:23 GMT Received: from Serenity (88-97-23-122.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.97.23.122]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1ALqHT1025702 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:52:17 GMT From: "Daniel King" To: References: <20100210214502.57A7D3A7603@core3.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20100210214502.57A7D3A7603@core3.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:52:19 -0000 Message-ID: <009a01caaa9b$51ca5db0$f55f1910$@co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcqqmnzcBqjLgpsHTBKjMd1s3xYXvAAALjTg Content-Language: en-gb Subject: Re: [Pce] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pce-pcep-svec-list-04.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:51:23 -0000 Howdy all, Adrian identified a number of items during his AD review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-svec-list-03.txt. Itaru and I have endeavoured to resolve the issues raised by Adrian. We believe the document is better for his suggestions and would appreciate any comments regarding this new version. Updates include: - Clearer abstract, clarifying the object of the draft - Reordered the Introduction - Provided ASCII art for some examples - Described Associated SVECs in more detail - Identified security considerations when using Associated SVECs. We also provided some suggestions for negating or minimising the effect of Dos using Associated SVECs. Best regards, Itaru and Dan. -----Original Message----- From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Sent: 10 February 2010 21:45 To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pce-pcep-svec-list-04.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF. Title : The use of SVEC (Synchronization VECtor) list for Synchronized dependent path computations Author(s) : I. Nishioka, D. King Filename : draft-ietf-pce-pcep-svec-list-04.txt Pages : 17 Date : 2010-02-10 A Path Computation Element (PCE) may be required to perform dependent path computations. Dependent path computations are requests that need to be synchronized in order to meet specific objectives. An example of a dependent request would be a PCE computing a set of services which are required to be diverse (disjointed) from each other. When a PCE computes sets of dependent path computation requests concurrently, it is required to use the Synchronization VECtor (SVEC) list for association among the sets of dependent path computation requests. The SVEC object is optional and carried within the Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) PCRequest (PCReq) message. This document does not specify the PCEP SVEC object or procedure. This informational document clarifies the use of the SVEC list for synchronized path computations when computing dependent requests. The document also describes a number of usage scenarios for SVEC lists within single domain and multi-domain environments. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-svec-list-04.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft. From julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com Mon Feb 15 08:23:40 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E790A28C0F3 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:23:40 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.248 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FGhDHl23Mtsf for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:23:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias92.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.92]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE97128C0F0 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:23:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from omfedm06.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.2]) by omfedm14.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id DF73A104880; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:25:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.47]) by omfedm06.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id C664727C09A; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:25:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.40]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:25:08 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:25:08 +0100 Message-ID: <11730_1266251108_4B797564_11730_42872_1_D109C8C97C15294495117745780657AE0C5194EC@ftrdmel1> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Nomcom 2009-2010: IESG Appointments Thread-Index: AcqsBcTNcS8sQlA4RyKL6JOq5tVebACUHR+Q From: To: , , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Feb 2010 16:25:08.0962 (UTC) FILETIME=[70B49420:01CAAE5B] X-PMX-Version: 5.5.7.378829, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2010.2.15.154228 Subject: [Pce] FW: Nomcom 2009-2010: IESG Appointments X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:23:41 -0000 Hi all. As you may be aware, Ross has reached the term of his AD mandate. Stewart Bryant, who you probably already know, has been nominated to join Adrian as routing AD. We do not know if they will swap some of their WG advisor hats, but I do not expect any change for the PCE WG. Thank you Ross, good luck in IAB. Hi Stewart, welcome among us. Regards Julien -----Original Message----- From: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mary Barnes Hi all, The 2009-2010 IETF Nominating committee is pleased to announce the selection of the IESG members whose two year terms start in March 2010.=20 The following have been selected to serve as ADs by the nominating committee for the open IESG positions and confirmed by the IAB in their role as confirming body: Applications: Peter Saint-Andre Internet: Jari Arkko Operations and Management: Dan Romascanu Real-time Applications and Infrastructure: Gonzalo Camarillo Routing: Stewart Bryant Security: Sean Turner Transport: David Harrington Our thanks to the incumbents who are not returning for their outstanding service, to the many qualified members of the community who offered to serve, to the community for their assistance in this process, and to the named individuals above for agreeing to serve the community on the IESG. Best Regards, Mary Barnes nomcom-chair@ietf.org mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com mary.barnes@nortel.com _______________________________________________ IETF-Announce mailing list IETF-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce ********************************* This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and inten= ded solely for the addressees.=20 Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. Messages are susceptible to alteration.=20 France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, change= d or falsified. If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it imm= ediately and inform the sender. ******************************** From julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com Wed Feb 17 08:19:45 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04FF028C102 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:19:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.248 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id idZNeHl6PrJg for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:19:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias244.francetelecom.com [80.12.204.244]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E1C28C0EC for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:19:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from omfeda08.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.201]) by omfeda14.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id B48CD2AC644 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:21:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.47]) by omfeda08.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 958D13840E6 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:21:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.40]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:21:20 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:21:18 +0100 Message-ID: <11523_1266423680_4B7C1780_11523_49_1_D109C8C97C15294495117745780657AE0C519BEF@ftrdmel1> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: RFC 5385 on Version 2.0 Microsoft Word Template for Creating InternetDrafts and RFCs Thread-Index: AcqsJFn/Hi9owssOTgasdhOnefo/6ADyAXMA From: To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Feb 2010 16:21:20.0064 (UTC) FILETIME=[3D190400:01CAAFED] X-PMX-Version: 5.5.7.378829, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2010.2.11.132124 Subject: [Pce] FW: RFC 5385 on Version 2.0 Microsoft Word Template for Creating InternetDrafts and RFCs X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:19:45 -0000 Hi all. I am sure everyone edits I-Ds with NROFF (or maybe XML-Mind?), but in case you use MS-Word... Julien -----Original Message----- From: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 RFC 5385 Title: Version 2.0 Microsoft Word Template=20 for Creating Internet Drafts and RFCs=20 Author: J. Touch Status: Informational Date: February 2010 Mailbox: touch@isi.edu Pages: 20 Characters: 38421 Obsoletes: RFC3285 I-D Tag: draft-touch-msword-template-v2.0-07.txt URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5385.txt This document describes the properties and use of a revised Microsoft Word template (.dot) for writing Internet Drafts and RFCs. It replaces the initial template described in RFC 3285 to more fully support Word's outline modes and to be easier to use. This template can be direct-printed and direct-viewed, where either is line-for-line identical with RFC Editor-compliant ASCII output. This version obsoletes RFC 3285. The most recent version of this template and post-processing scripts are available at http://www.isi.edu/touch/tools. This document is not an=20 Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational=20 purposes. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html. For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html. Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ IETF-Announce mailing list IETF-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce ********************************* This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and inten= ded solely for the addressees.=20 Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. Messages are susceptible to alteration.=20 France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, change= d or falsified. If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it imm= ediately and inform the sender. ******************************** From Senoo.Shoichiro@dc.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp Wed Feb 17 17:54:57 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC3528C2B5 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:54:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.11 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CxtIK9b8R6Zg for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:54:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx06.melco.co.jp (mx06.melco.co.jp [192.218.140.146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACF628C2A4 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:54:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mr06.melco.co.jp (mr06 [133.141.98.164]) by mx06.melco.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8365E6C5 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:56:35 +0900 (JST) Received: from mr06.melco.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mr06.imss (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA56E25E3F for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:56:34 +0900 (JST) Received: from elgw.isl.melco.co.jp (unknown [133.141.13.130]) by mr06.melco.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41C725E29 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:56:34 +0900 (JST) Received: from iswall2a.isl.melco.co.jp (iswall2a.isl.melco.co.jp [10.74.245.24]) by elgw.isl.melco.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745E431F3DD for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:56:34 +0900 (JST) Received: from iswall2a.isl.melco.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.isl.melco.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2648D22CBE6 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:56:34 +0900 (JST) Received: from LeakStopper186 (stopper2.isl.melco.co.jp [10.74.245.36]) by iswall2a.isl.melco.co.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FA4A22CBD2 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:56:34 +0900 (JST) Received: (qmail 25653 invoked by uid 507); 18 Feb 2010 10:56:33 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO mob2501.isl.melco.co.jp) (133.141.13.135) by 0 with SMTP; 18 Feb 2010 10:51:35 +0900 Received: from KF5ZXSFDNOKJ9H8 (unknown [10.62.216.183]) by mob2501.isl.melco.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B9421D8148; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:51:34 +0900 (JST) From: "Shoichiro Seno" To: , , , Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:51:38 +0900 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Thread-index: AcqwPOiWRafWxv+2Q/6NVNU13BvRMA== Subject: [Pce] iPOP 2010 submission deadline extended to March 1 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:54:57 -0000 CCAMP, MPLS, MPLS-TP and PCE subscribers, Please find below iPOP 2010 CFP with the extended deadline. Sorry for multiple messages. Sho Seno ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Call for Presentation 6th International Conference on IP + Optical Network (iPOP 2010) June 10-11, 2010 NTT Musashino R&D Center, Tokyo, Japan http://www.pilab.jp/ipop2010/ The conference is intended to share among the industry and the academia, the knowledge, new findings, and experience on the state-of-the art of IP and optical networking technologies. It features technical sessions and planned exhibitions. The opportunity to participate is open to all. Important Dates: Submission deadline of one-page abstract: March 1, 2010 (extended) Notification of acceptance: April 2, 2010 Submission deadline of final presentation slides: April 23, 2010 The Technical Program Committee for iPOP 2010 is soliciting presentation proposals for this conference. Protocol design, experiment, theory, implementation, and operational experiences are solicited. The topics of the conference will include but not limited to the following: * GMPLS/ASON technologies * GMPLS Network management, OA&M * Multi-layer network (MLN) / Multi-region network (MRN) * Path Computation Element (PCE), Traffic engineering * Inter-area/Inter-AS network * L1VPN, Bandwidth on Demand, and Photonic Grid * Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON), Routing wavelength assignment, Impairment management * GMPLS-controlled Ethernet Label Switching (GELS) and related Ethernet transport technologies * Carrier Ethernet and MPLS-TP * Photonic Network for NxGN and NwGN * Application with high-bandwidth demand * Testbed, field trial If you wish to submit a topic for consideration, please send an Extended Abstracts of a 400 words and a maximum of 1 page, including figures and diagrams, speaker's name, affiliation, and contact information to the Technical Program Committee at ipop2010-CFP@pilab.jp. Please see http://www.pilab.jp/ipop2010/ for more details. General Chairs: Tomonori Aoyama, Keio University, Japan Bijan Jabbari, ISOCORE, USA Hisashi Koumura, NTT, Japan Organization Committee Co-Chairs: Naoaki Yamanaka, Keio University, Japan Atsushi Hiramatsu, NTT, Japan Soichiro Araki, NEC, Japan Exhibition Committee Co-Chairs: Kohei Shiomoto, NTT, Japan Munefumi Tsurusawa, KDDI R&D, Japan Technical Program Committee Co-Chairs: Eiji Oki, University of Electro-Communications, Japan Monique Morrow, Cisco Systems, USA ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- From jvasseur@cisco.com Fri Feb 19 14:29:08 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6BD828C0DD for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:29:08 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.668 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.668 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.070, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W1O2KOdg7Qpr for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:29:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com (ams-iport-2.cisco.com [144.254.224.141]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A34A23A7B99 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:29:07 -0800 (PST) Authentication-Results: ams-iport-2.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoAAC+gfkuQ/uCWe2dsb2JhbACbCRUBARYkBhymV5dyhGcE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,506,1262563200"; d="scan'208,217";a="3615162" Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.150]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2010 21:59:08 +0000 Received: from xbh-ams-201.cisco.com (xbh-ams-201.cisco.com [144.254.75.7]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1JMUsQr001872 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:30:54 GMT Received: from xfe-ams-102.cisco.com ([144.254.231.94]) by xbh-ams-201.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:30:54 +0100 Received: from ams-jvasseur-8714.cisco.com ([10.55.201.133]) by xfe-ams-102.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:30:53 +0100 Message-Id: From: JP Vasseur To: pce@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-133-548644360 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:30:53 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Feb 2010 22:30:53.0607 (UTC) FILETIME=[3262AB70:01CAB1B3] X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.1181-6.000.1038-17204.002 X-TM-AS-Result: No--5.059400-8.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No Subject: [Pce] Porviosional Agenda X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:29:09 -0000 --Apple-Mail-133-548644360 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Here is the provisional agenda for the PCE WG Meeting - IETF-77 - Note that the final agenda will be available Feb 26: THURSDAY, March 25, 2010 1300-1500 Afternoon Session I Redondo INT netext Network-Based Mobility Extensions WG Manhattan IRTF SAMRG Scalable Adaptive Multicast Research Group California B OPS grow Global Routing Operations WG California A RAI p2psip Peer-to-Peer Session Initiation Protocol WG Huntington RTG pce Path Computation Element WG Palos Verdes RTG rtgwg Routing Area Working Group WG California D SEC saag Security Area Open Meeting California C TSV behave Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance WG We will soon start working on the agenda. Thanks. JP. --Apple-Mail-133-548644360 Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Here is the provisional agenda for = the PCE WG Meeting - IETF-77 - Note that the final agenda will be = available Feb 26:
THURSDAY, March 25, 2010
1300-1500  Afternoon Session I
Redondo         	INT 	netext      	Network-Based Mobility =
Extensions WG
Manhattan       	IRTF	SAMRG       	Scalable Adaptive =
Multicast Research Group=20
California B    	OPS 	grow        	Global Routing =
Operations WG
California A    	RAI 	p2psip      	Peer-to-Peer Session =
Initiation Protocol WG
Huntington      	RTG 	pce         	Path Computation Element =
WG
Palos Verdes    	RTG 	rtgwg       	Routing Area Working =
Group WG
California D    	SEC 	saag        	Security Area Open =
Meeting=20
California C    	TSV 	behave      	Behavior Engineering for =
Hindrance Avoidance WG
We will soon start working on the agenda.
Thanks.

JP.
= --Apple-Mail-133-548644360-- From wwwrun@core3.amsl.com Mon Feb 22 06:04:57 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietf.org Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 30) id 27F8428C125; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 06:04:57 -0800 (PST) X-idtracker: yes To: IETF-Announce From: The IESG Message-Id: <20100222140457.27F8428C125@core3.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 06:04:57 -0800 (PST) Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Last Call: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-svec-list (The use of SVEC (Synchronization VECtor) list for Synchronized dependent path computations) to Informational RFC X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:04:57 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the Path Computation Element WG (pce) to consider the following document: - 'The use of SVEC (Synchronization VECtor) list for Synchronized dependent path computations ' as an Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2010-03-08. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. The file can be obtained via http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-svec-list-04.txt IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=17730&rfc_flag=0 From wwwrun@core3.amsl.com Mon Feb 22 09:36:42 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietf.org Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 30) id 3987728C151; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:36:41 -0800 (PST) X-idtracker: yes From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Message-Id: <20100222173642.3987728C151@core3.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:36:42 -0800 (PST) Cc: Internet Architecture Board , pce mailing list , pce chair , RFC Editor Subject: [Pce] Document Action: 'PCC-PCE Communication Requirements for Point to Multipoint Multiprotocol Label Switching Traffic Engineering (MPLS-TE)' to Informational RFC X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:36:42 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'PCC-PCE Communication Requirements for Point to Multipoint Multiprotocol Label Switching Traffic Engineering (MPLS-TE) ' as an Informational RFC This document is the product of the Path Computation Element Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Ross Callon and Adrian Farrel. A URL of this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-p2mp-req-05.txt Technical Summary Generic requirements for a communication protocol between Path Computation Clients (PCCs) and Path Computation Elements (PCEs) are presented in "Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol Generic Requirements". This informational document complements the generic requirements and presents a detailed set of PCC-PCE communication protocol requirements for point-to- multipoint MPLS/GMPLS traffic engineering. Working Group Summary Good consensus reported with no controversy (see PROTO writeup by JP Vasseur in the ID Tracker). Document Quality The document thas had adequate review, and has passed WG and IETF last calls, and has been updated based on minor comments received during IETF last call. As an informational requirements document this is not subject to be implemented. There is ongoing work in the PCE working group to define point to multipoint extensions to PCE. Personnel JP Vasseur is the Document Shepherd for this document. Ross Callon is the Responsible Area Director. From jvasseur@cisco.com Mon Feb 22 23:24:30 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A9128C536 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:24:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.505 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.505 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.907, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JpzEoxTUhUom for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:24:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com (ams-iport-2.cisco.com [144.254.224.141]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA44C28C540 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:24:28 -0800 (PST) Authentication-Results: ams-iport-2.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvAAABwSg0uQ/uCWe2dsb2JhbACBQplEFQEBFiQGHKIQmEKEaQQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,524,1262563200"; d="scan'208,217";a="3685767" Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.150]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Feb 2010 06:54:28 +0000 Received: from xbh-ams-201.cisco.com (xbh-ams-201.cisco.com [144.254.75.7]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1N7QU4S028677 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:26:30 GMT Received: from xfe-ams-201.cisco.com ([144.254.231.95]) by xbh-ams-201.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:26:30 +0100 Received: from ams-jvasseur-8712.cisco.com ([10.55.201.131]) by xfe-ams-201.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:26:30 +0100 Message-Id: <6FE9B571-9518-4056-8855-DFDD3F175AFC@cisco.com> From: JP Vasseur To: pce@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-233-839981126 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:26:29 +0100 References: <20100222200002.042C53A8142@core3.amsl.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Feb 2010 07:26:30.0280 (UTC) FILETIME=[84931080:01CAB459] Subject: [Pce] Fwd: Internet Draft Cut-off Dates Reminder X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:24:30 -0000 --Apple-Mail-233-839981126 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Begin forwarded message: > From: IETF Secretariat > Date: February 22, 2010 9:00:01 PM CEST > To: ietf-announce@ietf.org > Subject: Internet Draft Cut-off Dates Reminder > > > This is a reminder that the Internet Draft Cut-off Dates are > approaching. > > > The initial draft (version -00) cut-off date is Monday, March 1, 2010. > These submissions are due by 17:00 PST (01:00 Tuesday, March 2 UTC). > > The Internet Draft final submission (version -01 and up) cut-off is > Monday, March 8, 2010 at 17:00 PST (01:00 Tuesday, March 2 UTC). > > All drafts can be uploaded using the ID submission tool located here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/idst/upload.cgi > _______________________________________________ > IETF-Announce mailing list > IETF-Announce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce --Apple-Mail-233-839981126 Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Begin = forwarded message:

From: = IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat@ietf.org>= ;
Date: February 22, 2010 9:00:01 PM = CEST
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org
Subject: Internet Draft Cut-off Dates = Reminder 


This is = a reminder that the Internet Draft Cut-off Dates are = approaching.


The initial draft (version -00) cut-off date is = Monday, March 1, 2010.
These submissions are due by 17:00 PST (01:00 = Tuesday, March 2 UTC).

The Internet Draft final submission = (version -01 and up) cut-off is
Monday, March 8, 2010 at 17:00 PST = (01:00 Tuesday, March 2 UTC).

All drafts can be uploaded using = the ID submission tool located here:
https://datatracker.= ietf.org/idst/upload.cgi
__________________________________________= _____
IETF-Announce mailing = list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ie= tf-announce

= --Apple-Mail-233-839981126-- From root@core3.amsl.com Fri Feb 26 01:45:01 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietf.org Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 53D983A85EB; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:45:00 -0800 (PST) From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart" Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20100226094501.53D983A85EB@core3.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:45:01 -0800 (PST) Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pce-manageability-requirements-08.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:45:01 -0000 --NextPart A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF. Title : Inclusion of Manageability Sections in PCE Working Group Drafts Author(s) : A. Farrel Filename : draft-ietf-pce-manageability-requirements-08.txt Pages : 12 Date : 2010-02-26 It has often been the case that manageability considerations have been retrofitted to protocols after they have been specified, standardized, implemented, or deployed. This is sub-optimal. Similarly, new protocols or protocol extensions are frequently designed without due consideration of manageability requirements. This document specifies the recommendation for all new Internet-Drafts in the PCE Working Group to include a "Manageability Considerations" section, and gives guidance on what that section should contain. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-manageability-requirements-08.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft. --NextPart Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="draft-ietf-pce-manageability-requirements-08.txt"; site="ftp.ietf.org"; access-type="anon-ftp"; directory="internet-drafts" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <2010-02-26013815.I-D@ietf.org> --NextPart-- From adrian@olddog.co.uk Fri Feb 26 01:47:15 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A811B28C103 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:47:15 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.31 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.288, BAYES_00=-2.599, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hTfa-S0hpTX9 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:47:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (asmtp1.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.248]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04BA28C0D7 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:47:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1Q9nB7X008749 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:49:16 GMT Received: from your029b8cecfe (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1Q9n8aB008719 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:49:10 GMT Message-ID: <76F0884DE18D475CA4AA355716E3DD20@your029b8cecfe> From: "Adrian Farrel" To: Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:49:06 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Subject: [Pce] draft-ietf-pce-manageability-requirements X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: Adrian Farrel List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:47:15 -0000 Hi PCE WG, Over the last couple of years, you have been reasonably willing experimenters with draft-ietf-pce-manageability-requirements. IMHO, this has resulted in greatly improved output from the working group, and we have seen PCE drafts progress through IESG review with a bit more ease as a result. However, with the recent publication of RFC 5706, the working group needs to decide what to do about this draft. It seems that the choices are: - Continue to keep the draft alive as a reference for the WG, but do not seek to progress it to RFC - Abandon the draft and use RFC 5706 as the reference for future manageability work - Request publication of this draft as a Historic RFC and move to use RFC 5706 as the reference for future manageability work I have just posted a new revision of draft-ietf-pce-manageability-requirements to keep it alive, but this is most certainly not an attempt by your AD to dictate what you should do. Maybe this is a topic the WG chairs would like to discuss with you (possibly in Anaheim) with a view to letting me know what you would like to do with this draft. Thanks, Adrian