From giomarti@cisco.com Thu Aug 1 00:17:25 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F8921F9A90 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:17:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p8VKx0I-zL2J for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:17:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF5821F9A97 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:17:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2826; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1375341438; x=1376551038; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=pRBzHgTXAAzbbDOjC/S+8Ez262S+muBGuvIR63DFByM=; b=ka2DyTit7IM8ddKqhSqdUfZyPzOwMEoQtuxMyNhksgk/QSJO4tNdtMLE VcGrFll20skcMnBHkRQV5XiBrRifNvEKxx/4uRhSUQoZuoOI09Sb22oH9 sNCegPZi6xi2xMInSmMvjG0Bl9IDJL3QE9sbP/UQhDYcy93zcoIwbERmh w=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgIFAEwK+lGtJXG9/2dsb2JhbABbgwaBBb5MgR4WdIIlAQEEeRACAQgEHh0HMhQRAgQOBQiICLk0j1YxB4MYcwOpLIMUgio X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,792,1367971200"; d="scan'208,217";a="241925967" Received: from rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com ([173.37.113.189]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Aug 2013 07:17:17 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com [173.36.12.81]) by rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r717HHxg031157 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:17:17 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.213]) by xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com ([173.36.12.81]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 02:17:16 -0500 From: "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" To: Ramon Casellas Thread-Topic: [Pce] Bandwidth: Comments on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-08 Thread-Index: AQHOjnLO9fpWJgGX8UWXYZ6AS8Fc3ZmARTiA Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:17:16 +0000 Message-ID: <0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0E158610@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> References: <04fc01ce8df4$449e3a40$cddaaec0$@olddog.co.uk> <51F9CD23.4040401@cttc.es> In-Reply-To: <51F9CD23.4040401@cttc.es> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.61.94.7] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0E158610xmbrcdx14ciscoc_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "" , "Margaria, Cyril \(Coriant - DE/Munich\)" Subject: Re: [Pce] Bandwidth: Comments on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-08 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 07:17:25 -0000 --_000_0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0E158610xmbrcdx14ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ramon, just for my understanding... On Aug 1, 2013, at 4:51 , Ramon Casellas > wrote: Another use case (very particular to mu interests) is when I want to ask th= e PCE to perform routing and spectrum assignment. I want the PCE to compute= a path of a given spectrum width, to pre-establish it. the width is given = by the corresponding OTS / slot, and the actual client signal mapping is un= known, and will depend on the modulation format and FEC. I don't know what = bandwdith I would convey in the message. What exactly inputs you have to your CSFP and what the output you expect? cheers G --_000_0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0E158610xmbrcdx14ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <9F97FFA61A561E4A9B78DA2ABF984975@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ramon,

just for my understanding...

On Aug 1, 2013, at 4:51 , Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>
 wrote:

Another use case (very particular to mu interests) is when I want to ask the PCE t= o perform routing and spectrum assignment. I want the PCE to compute a path= of a given spectrum width, to pre-establish it. the width is given by the = corresponding OTS / slot, and the actual client signal mapping is unknown, and will depend on the modulation= format and FEC. I don't know what bandwdith I would convey in the message.=  

What exactly inputs you have to your CSFP and what the output you expe= ct?


cheers
G
--_000_0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0E158610xmbrcdx14ciscoc_-- From cyril.margaria@coriant.com Thu Aug 1 00:23:58 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F9E21F9D28 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:23:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.259 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.259 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.339, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BTLcE3Eg7xpV for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:23:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.185]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A60E21F9BA4 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:23:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail32-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.251) by CH1EHSOBE010.bigfish.com (10.43.70.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:23:51 +0000 Received: from mail32-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail32-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77D53401A3; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:23:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.253.53; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:DB3PRD0411HT002.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -26 X-BigFish: PS-26(zzbb2dI98dI9371Ic89bh148cI1418Ic857h14ffIdb82hzz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1d7338h1de098h1033IL17326ah18c673h1c8fb4h1de096h1954cbh8275bh8275dh1de097hz2fh2a8h668h839hd25hf0ah1288h12a5h12bdh137ah1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1bceh1d07h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1de9h1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1155h) Received-SPF: pass (mail32-ch1: domain of coriant.com designates 157.56.253.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.253.53; envelope-from=cyril.margaria@coriant.com; helo=DB3PRD0411HT002.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; Received: from mail32-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail32-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1375341829237154_7281; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:23:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1EHSMHS029.bigfish.com (snatpool2.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.236]) by mail32-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF6030004A; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:23:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DB3PRD0411HT002.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (157.56.253.53) by CH1EHSMHS029.bigfish.com (10.43.70.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:23:48 +0000 Received: from DB3PRD0411MB427.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.6.251]) by DB3PRD0411HT002.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.73.37]) with mapi id 14.16.0341.000; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:23:38 +0000 From: "Margaria, Cyril (Coriant - DE/Munich)" To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" , 'Fatai Zhang' , 'Ramon Casellas' , 'Jonathan Hardwick' , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Bandwidth: Comments on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-08 Thread-Index: Ac6N9DiVJiun0U6YRwaJrGQj4XjIeQAjgO/A Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:23:36 +0000 Message-ID: <523C37072C291347B9730C9291CCA07D0D1A38@DB3PRD0411MB427.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> References: <04fc01ce8df4$449e3a40$cddaaec0$@olddog.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <04fc01ce8df4$449e3a40$cddaaec0$@olddog.co.uk> Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [130.129.21.250] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_523C37072C291347B9730C9291CCA07D0D1A38DB3PRD0411MB427eu_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: coriant.com X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% Subject: Re: [Pce] Bandwidth: Comments on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-08 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 07:23:58 -0000 --_000_523C37072C291347B9730C9291CCA07D0D1A38DB3PRD0411MB427eu_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 QWRyaWFuLCBhbGwNClBsZWFzZSBzZWUgaW5saW5lDQpGcm9tOiBBZHJpYW4gRmFycmVsIFttYWls dG86YWRyaWFuQG9sZGRvZy5jby51a10NClNlbnQ6IFdlZG5lc2RheSwgSnVseSAzMSwgMjAxMyAz OjQ2IFBNDQpUbzogTWFyZ2FyaWEsIEN5cmlsIChDb3JpYW50IC0gREUvTXVuaWNoKTsgJ0ZhdGFp IFpoYW5nJzsgJ1JhbW9uIENhc2VsbGFzJzsgJ0pvbmF0aGFuIEhhcmR3aWNrJzsgcGNlQGlldGYu b3JnDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBCYW5kd2lkdGg6IENvbW1lbnRzIG9uIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtcGNlLWdtcGxz LXBjZXAtZXh0ZW5zaW9ucy0wOA0KDQpIaSBDeXJpbCwNCg0KVGhhbmtzIGZvciByYWlzaW5nIHRo ZSBxdWVzdGlvbi4NCg0KQmVmb3JlIGdldHRpbmcgb24gdG8gZGlzY3VzcyBob3cgdG8gbWFrZSB0 aGUgY2hhbmdlLCB3ZSBuZWVkIHRvIGRpZyBtb3JlIGludG8gIndoeSB0byBtYWtlIHRoZSBjaGFu Z2UiLg0KDQpJIHdlbnQgc3RyYWlnaHQgdG8gdGhpcyBkcmFmdCB0cnlpbmcgdG8gZmluZCB0aGUg cmVhc29uaW5nLg0KSW4gMS4zIEkgZm91bmQuLi4NCiAgICAgW1JGQzU0NDBdIGRvZXMgbm90IGlu Y2x1ZGUgdGhlIGFiaWxpdHkgdG8NCiAgICAgIGNvbnZleSBhIChJbnRzZXJ2KSBUU1BFQyBvYmpl Y3QuDQpJIHByb2JhYmx5IG1hZGUgdGhlIG1pc3Rha2Ugb2Ygc3RvcHBpbmcgd2hlbiBJIHJlYWNo ZWQgdGhpcyB0ZXh0Lg0KVGhlIHRleHQgaXMgY29tcGxldGVseSB0cnVlIQ0KSG93ZXZlciwgNTQ0 MCB3YXMgd2lsZnVsIGluIGl0cyBjaG9pY2UgdG8gbm90IHN1cHBvcnQgSW50c2VydiBvbiB0aGUg dW5kZXJzdGFuZGluZyAod2hpY2ggbWlnaHQgbm90IGJlIHRydWUgYW55bW9yZSwgYnV0IHByb2Jh Ymx5IGlzKSB0aGF0IG5vLW9uZSB1c2VzIEludHNlcnYgVFNwZWMgaW4gdGhlaXIgTVBMUy1URSBv ciBHTVBMUyBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbnMuDQoNCipJZiogSW50c2VydiBpcyB0aGUgb25seSByZWFz b24gZm9yIHRoZSBkaXNjdXNzaW9uIG9mIGNoYW5naW5nIHRoZSBCYW5kd2lkdGggb2JqZWN0LCB3 ZSBzaG91bGQgZHJvcCB0aGUgZGlzY3Vzc2lvbiwgSU1ITy4NCg0KSSB0aGVuIHdlbnQgdG8gZHJh ZnQtaWV0Zi1wY2UtZ21wbHMtYXBzLXJlcSBhbmQgc2VhcmNoZWQgZm9yICJiYW5kd2lkdGgiIGFu ZCB0aGUgb25seSBkaXNjdXNzaW9uIEkgZm91bmQgd2FzIHdpdGggcmVzcGVjdCB0byB0aGUgYXN5 bW1ldHJpY2FsIHJlcXVpcmVtZW50cy4NCg0KDQpBdCB0aGUgbWljLCBDeXJpbCBhbmQgRmF0YWkg aGVscGVkIG1lIHRvIHVuZGVyc3RhbmQgdGhhdCB0aGUgcmVxdWlyZW1lbnQgaXMgbm90IHNwZWNp ZmljIHRvIGJhbmR3aWR0aCwgYnV0IGlzIHJlbGF0ZWQgdG8gVHJhZmZpYyBQYXJhbWV0ZXJzIHRo YXQgd2lsbCBiZSBzaWduYWxlZC4gVGhpcyBicmVha3MgdGhlIHByb2JsZW0gb3V0IGludG8gdGhy ZWUgZGlmZmVyZW50IHVzZSBjYXNlczoNCg0KMS4gVGhlIFBDQyB3aXNoZXMgdG8gcmVxdWVzdCAq YmFuZHdpZHRoKi4gSXQgZG9lcyBub3QgbWluZCBpdCBnZXRzIGEgZmF0IHBpcGUgb3IgVkNBVCwg YSBsYW1iZGEgb3IgT1ROLg0KMi4gVGhlIFBDQyB3YW50cyBiYW5kd2lkdGgsIGJ1dCAqZG9lcyog Y2FyZSBhYm91dCBob3cgdGhpcyBzdXBwbGllZCBpbiB0aGUgbmV0d29yay4gVGhpcyBtYWtlcyB0 aGUgcmVxdWVzdDoNCiAgIGkuIGxheWVyLXNwZWNpZmljDQogICBpaS4gc3ViLWxheWVyLXNwZWNp ZmljDQogICBpaWkuIGxhYmVsLXNwZWNpZmljDQozLiBUaGUgUENFIHdhbnRzIHRvIGNvbnZleSBp bmZvcm1hdGlvbiB0byB0aGUgUENDIGFib3V0IHdoYXQgZGV0YWlscyBpdCBuZWVkcyB0byBwbGFj ZSBpbiBzaWduYWxpbmcuDQoNCk15IHZpZXcgaXMgdGhhdCB0aGUgQmFuZHdpZHRoIG9iamVjdCBp cyBub3QgY2FsbGVkIHRoZSAiU2VuZGVyLVRTcGVjIG9iamVjdCBmb3IgdXNlIGlmIHRoZSBQQ0Mg anVzdCBoYXBwZW5zIHRvIGJlIHRoZSBpbmdyZXNzIG5vZGUgb2YgYSBHTVBMUyBMU1AiIG9iamVj dCEgTXkgdmlldyBpcyB0aGF0IHRoZSBiYW5kd2lkdGggb2JqZWN0IGRlc2NyaWJlcyB0aGUgYmFu ZHdpZHRoIHRoYXQgaGFzIGJlZW4gcmVxdWVzdGVkLCBhbmQgdGhlIGJhbmR3aWR0aCB0aGF0IHRo ZSBzdXBwbGllZCBwYXRoIHdpbGwgYWN0dWFsbHkgYmUgYWJsZSB0byBzdXBwbHkgKG1heSBiZSA+ LCA9LCBvciA8IHJlcXVlc3RlZCBiL3cpLg0KDQpbW01hcmdhcmlhLkNdXSBJIGhhdmUgdGhlIHNh bWUgdW5kZXJzdGFuZGluZyBvbiB0aGUgc2VtYW50aWMsIGJ1dCBub3Qgb24gdGhlIGVuY29kaW5n LiBGb3Igc29tZSBQQ0MgKGNvcnJlc3BvbmRpbmcgdG8gMi1pKSBoYXZpbmcgYSBmbG9hdGluZyBw b2ludCBvbmx5IHdpbGwgbWFrZSBoaW0gdHJhbnNsYXRlIHRoYXQgaW4gaXRzIGxheWVyIGJhbmR3 aWR0aCwgd2hpY2ggbWF5IGJlIHNvbWV0aW1lIHRoZSByaWdodCB0cmFuc2xhdGlvbi4NCkkgdW5k ZXJzdGFuZCB0aGUgY3VycmVudCBlbmNvZGluZyBhcyBiYW5kd2lkdGggZm9yIHNvbWUgcGFja2V0 LXBhY2tldCBiYXNlZCB0ZWNobm9sb2d5LCBidXQgaXQgaXMgbm90IGFkZXF1YXRlIGZvciBhbGwg dGVjaG5vbG9naWVzLQ0KVGh1cywgSU1ITywgaWYgd2Ugd2FudCB0byBjb25zdHJhaW4gdGhlIHJl cXVlc3QgdG8gcmV0dXJuIHBhdGhzIHRoYXQgdXNlIGEgbGltaXRlZCBzZXQgb2YgdGhlIGF2YWls YWJsZSBuZXR3b3JrIHJlc291cmNlcywgd2UgbmVlZCB0byBhZGQgdGhpcyB0aHJvdWdoIG90aGVy IG9iamVjdHMuDQoNCltbTWFyZ2FyaWEuQ11dIFRoYXQgd291bGQgd29yaywgYnV0IEkgdGhpbmsg dGhhdCBoYXZpbmcgYSBuZXcgQ1R5cGUgdG8gY29udmV5IGRpZmZlcmVudCBlbmNvZGluZyBvZiB0 aGUgYmFuZHdpZHRoIHdvdWxkIGJlIGJldHRlci4gVGhpcyB3b3VsZCBhbGxvdyB0byByZXF1ZXN0 IHRvIHJlcXVlc3QgYSBWQzQgYW5kIGdldCBhIHB3ZSBiYW5kd2lkdGggKHVzZSBjYXNlIDEpLiBU aGUgY29uc3RyYWluaW5nIHRvIGxheWVycyBpcyBhZGRyZXNzZWQgaW4gdGhlIGludGVyLWxheWVy IGRyYWZ0Lg0KDQpBbmQgaWYgd2Ugd2FudCB0byBnaXZlIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIHRvIHRoZSBQQ0Mg dGhhdCBpdCBjYW4gbWFwIHRvIHNwZWNpZmljIGRldGFpbHMgaW4gdGhlIHNpZ25hbGluZyBwcm90 b2NvbCwgdGhlbiB3ZSBzaG91bGQgcHJvdmlkZSB0aGF0IGRldGFpbCBpbiBvYmplY3RzIHNwZWNp ZmljYWxseSBpbnRlbmRlZCB0byBjYXJyeSB0aGF0IGluZm9ybWF0aW9uLiAgVGhpcyBpbmZvcm1h dGlvbiBpcyBjbGVhcmx5IHJlbGF0ZWQgdG8gYmFuZHdpZHRoLCBidXQgaXQgaXMgbm90IHRoZSBz YW1lIGFzIGJhbmR3aWR0aA0KW1tNYXJnYXJpYS5DXV0gSXRzIG5vdCBzcGVjaWZpYyB0byB0aGUg c2lnbmFsbGluZyBwcm90b2NvbCBwZXIgc2UgKGFsdGhvdWdoIHdlIGFyZSB1c2luZyBvbmUgcHJv dG9jb2wgZW5jb2RpbmcpLCBpdCBpcyBzcGVjaWZpYyB0byB0aGUgbGF5ZXIgdXNlZCwgYW5kIHRo aXMgaXMgYWRkcmVzc2VkIGluIENDQU1QIGRyYWZ0LXpoYW5nLWNjYW1wLWdtcGxzLWgtbHNwLW1s biAoYW5kIGlzIGN1cnJlbnRseSBhZGRyZXNzZWQgaW4gYW5vdGhlciB3YXkgaW4gdGhlIGludGVy LWxheWVyIGZvciB0aGF0IG1hdHRlcikuDQoNCkp1c3QgbXkg4oKsMC4wMg0KQWRyaWFuDQoNCkZy b206IHBjZS1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnPG1haWx0bzpwY2UtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZz4gW21h aWx0bzpwY2UtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gT24gQmVoYWxmIE9mIE1hcmdhcmlhLCBDeXJpbCAo Q29yaWFudCAtIERFL011bmljaCkNClNlbnQ6IDMwIEp1bHkgMjAxMyAxNzozMw0KVG86IEZhdGFp IFpoYW5nOyBSYW1vbiBDYXNlbGxhczsgSm9uYXRoYW4gSGFyZHdpY2s7IHBjZUBpZXRmLm9yZzxt YWlsdG86cGNlQGlldGYub3JnPg0KU3ViamVjdDogUmU6IFtQY2VdIOetlOWkjTogQ29tbWVudHMg b24gZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1wY2UtZ21wbHMtcGNlcC1leHRlbnNpb25zLTA4DQoNCkhpIFBDRSBXRywN Cg0KVGhlIFByb2JsZW0gd2UgaGFkIHdpdGggdGhlIEJBTkRXSURUSCAoYW5kIExPQUQtQkFMQU5D SU5HIEJUVykgb2JqZWN0IGlzIHRoYXQgUkZDNTQ0MCBzZWN0aW9uIDcuNyBkZWZpbmVzDQrigJxU aGUgQkFORFdJRFRIIG9iamVjdCBib2R5IGhhcyBhIGZpeGVkIGxlbmd0aCBvZiA0IGJ5dGVzLuKA nQ0KDQpSRkM1NDQwIGRlZmluZXMgdHdvIE9UIDogMSBhbmQgMi4gVGhlIHRleHQgY2FuIGJlIGlu dGVycHJldGVkIGFzIGFsbCBPVCAoY3VycmVudCBhbmQgZnV0dXJlKSBzaG91bGQgaGF2ZSBsZW5n dGggPSA0LCB0aGlzIGlzIG5vdCBmdXR1cmUgZnJpZW5kbHkuDQoNCk5vdyBzZXZlcmFsIG9wdGlv bnMgY2FuIGJlIGNvbnNpZGVyZWQgOg0KDQoxKSAgICAgIEdNUExTLXBjZXAgZXh0ZW5zaW9ucyA6 IG5ldyBvYmplY3QsIGtlZXAgZXhpc3RpbmcgaW1wbGVtZW50YXRpb24gdW50b3VjaGVkLCBhdCB0 aGUgZXhwZW5zZSBvZiB0aGUgZ21wbHMgb25lcyAobW9yZSBjb21wbGV4IHJ1bGVzKQ0KDQoyKSAg ICAgIEFsbG93IFRMViBpbiB0aGUgQkFORFdJRFRIDQoNCjMpICAgICAgVHJlYXQgdGhpcyBhcyBh biBlcnJhdGEgdG8gUkZDNTQ0MCDigJzigJxUaGUgQkFORFdJRFRIIG9mIE9UIDEgYW5kIE9UIDIg IG9iamVjdCBib2R5IGhhdmUgYSBmaXhlZCBsZW5ndGggb2YgNCBieXRlcy7igJ0sIGFuZCBkZWZp bmUgbmV3IE9UIGZvciBHTVBMUw0KDQpUaGUgQ29ucyBvZiAxIGlzIGRpc2N1c3NlZCBiZWxvdy4N ClRoZSBjb25zIG9mIHRoZSBUTFYgd291bGQgYmUgdG8gY2hhbmdlIGV4aXN0aW5nIG9iamVjdCBk ZWZpbml0aW9uIGFuZCBtYWtlIHRoZSBwcm90b2NvbCBkZWZpbml0aW9uIHJhdGhlciBhd2t3YXJk IDogZGlmZmVyZW50IE9iamVjdCBmb3JtYXQgZGVwZW5kaW5nIG9uIE9QRU4gKGZvciBleGFtcGxl KSBuZWdvdGlhdGlvbiBhbmQgd291bGQgbm90IGhlbHAgZm9yIG5ldyBDVHlwZXMNCg0KV2l0aCAz KSB0aGUgZXhpc3RpbmcgaW1wbGVtZW50YXRpb24gZm9yIGV4aXN0aW5nIENUeXBlIHdpbGwgc2Vl IG5vIGNoYW5nZSwgaXQgbWF5IGJlIGEgcHJvYmxlbSBmb3IgbmV3IENUeXBlcyAoYW55aG93IG5v dCBzdXBwb3J0ZWQpLCBidXQgYW4gaW1wbGVtZW50YXRpb24gbWF5IHJldHVybiBhbiBVbmtub3cg b2JqZWN0LCB1bmtub3duIG9iamVjdCB0eXBlIE9SIHRyZWF0ZWQgYXMgaW52YWxpZCBvYmplY3Qu IFRoaXMgY2FuIGJlIHNvbHZlZCBieSBuZWdvdGlhdGluZyB0aGUgdXNlIG9mIE9UPjIgZm9yIEJB TkRXSURUSCAoYW5kIExPQUQtQkFMQU5DSU5HKQ0KDQpGb3IgdGhlIHNha2Ugb2YgZGlzY3Vzc2lv biBJIGF0dGFjaCBhIHNsaWRlc2V0IGlmIGJ5IGFueSBjaGFuY2UgdGhlcmUgaXMgc29tZSB0aW1l IGxlZnQgZHVyaW5nIHRoZSBzZXNzaW9uLA0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCk1pdCBmcmV1bmRsaWNo ZW4gR3LDvMOfZW4gLyBCZXN0IFJlZ2FyZHMNCkN5cmlsIE1hcmdhcmlhDQpGcm9tOiBwY2UtYm91 bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZzxtYWlsdG86cGNlLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmc+IFttYWlsdG86cGNlLWJv dW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmddIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiBGYXRhaSBaaGFuZw0KU2VudDogVHVlc2RheSwg SnVseSAzMCwgMjAxMyAyOjQxIFBNDQpUbzogUmFtb24gQ2FzZWxsYXM7IEpvbmF0aGFuIEhhcmR3 aWNrOyBwY2VAaWV0Zi5vcmc8bWFpbHRvOnBjZUBpZXRmLm9yZz4NClN1YmplY3Q6IFtQY2VdIOet lOWkjTogQ29tbWVudHMgb24gZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1wY2UtZ21wbHMtcGNlcC1leHRlbnNpb25zLTA4 DQoNCkhpIGFsbCwNCg0KSSB0aGluayBhIG5ldyBvYmplY3QgdHlwZSBjb3VsZCBiZSBiZXR0ZXIg YW5kIHNpbXBsZS4NCg0KVGhhbmtzDQoNCkZhdGFpDQoNCg0K5Y+R5Lu25Lq6OiBwY2UtYm91bmNl c0BpZXRmLm9yZzxtYWlsdG86cGNlLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmc+IFttYWlsdG86cGNlLWJvdW5j ZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmddIOS7o+ihqCBSYW1vbiBDYXNlbGxhcw0K5Y+R6YCB5pe26Ze0OiAyMDEz5bm0 N+aciDMw5pelIDE3OjMyDQrmlLbku7bkuro6IEpvbmF0aGFuIEhhcmR3aWNrOyBwY2VAaWV0Zi5v cmc8bWFpbHRvOnBjZUBpZXRmLm9yZz4NCuS4u+mimDogUmU6IFtQY2VdIENvbW1lbnRzIG9uIGRy YWZ0LWlldGYtcGNlLWdtcGxzLXBjZXAtZXh0ZW5zaW9ucy0wOA0KDQpPbiAwNy8zMC8yMDEzIDEx OjA4IEFNLCBKb25hdGhhbiBIYXJkd2ljayB3cm90ZToNCkN5cmlsIGFuZCBJIGhhZCBhbiBvZmZs aW5lIGNvbnZlcnNhdGlvbiBhYm91dCB0aGVzZSBjb21tZW50cy4gIFRoaXMgZW1haWwgaXMgdG8g ZG9jdW1lbnQgdGhlIGRpc2N1c3Npb24gZm9yIHRoZSBiZW5lZml0IG9mIHRoZSBtYWlsaW5nIGxp c3QuICBTZWUgW0pFSC1NQ10gY29tbWVudHMgYmVsb3cuDQoNCldlIGhhdmUgb25lIHF1ZXN0aW9u IGZvciB0aGUgV0csIGFzIGZvbGxvd3MuICBJZiBhbnlvbmUgaGFzIGFuIG9waW5pb24gb24gdGhp cywgcGxlYXNlIGNvdWxkIHlvdSBwcm92aWRlIGl0IHRvIHRoZSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3Q/DQoNCi0t LQ0KW0pFSC1NQ10gSm9uIGJlbGlldmVzIHRoYXQgdGhpcyBkcmFmdCBzaG91bGQgcmVsYXggdGhl IHJlc3RyaWN0aW9uIG9mIFJGQyA1NDQwIHRoYXQgdGhlIEJBTkRXSURUSCBvYmplY3QgaXMgbWFu ZGF0b3J5LCBpbiB0aGUgY2FzZSB3aGVyZSBhIEdFTkVSQUxJWkVELUJBTkRXSURUSCBpcyBzdXBw bGllZCBpbnN0ZWFkLiAgVGhpcyB3b3VsZCBtZWFuIGNoYW5naW5nIGV4aXN0aW5nIHByb2NlZHVy ZXMsIHRoZSBpbml0aWFsIG1lY2hhbmlzbSB3YXMgbm90IHRvIGNoYW5nZSBSRkM1NDQwIG9iamVj dCBwcmVzZW5jZSBydWxlLiAgQ3lyaWwgaXMgZmluZSB3aXRoIHRoZSBwcm9wb3NhbCBmcm9tIEpv bmF0aGFuLCBidXQgd2Ugd291bGQgbGlrZSB0byBnZXQgV0cgYW5kIGltcGxlbWVudGVycyBmZWVk YmFjay4NCg0KDQpKb24sIEN5cmlsLCBhbGwNCg0KSW4gdGhpcyBjYXNlLCBJIHdvdWxkIGdvIGJh Y2sgdG8gb25lIG9mIG15IGluaXRpYWwgc3VnZ2VzdGlvbnM6IGRvIG5vdCBhZGQgR0VORVJBTEla RURfQkFORFdJRFRIIGFuZCBhZGQgYSBUTFYgdG8gdGhlIEJXIG9iamVjdHMsIHdoaWNoIGNhbiBi ZSBpZ25vcmVkLg0KDQpJbiBvdGhlciB3b3JkcywgdGhlIGNyZWF0aW9uIG9mIEdFTl9CVyB3YXMg anVzdGlmaWVkIGR1ZSB0bzogIGEpIGRvIG5vdCB0b3VjaCByZmM1NDQwIGIpIGlmIFJGQzU0NDAg ZG9lcyBub3Qgc3RhdGUgdGhhdCBCVyBvYmplY3QgY2FuIGhhdmUgVExWcywgdGhlbiB0aGV5IGNh bid0IGFuZCBpdCBpcyBmaXhlZCBsZW5ndGguDQoNCk15IHBlcnNvbmFsIHByZWZlcmVuY2UgYWx3 YXlzIHdhcyB0byBhZGQgYSBUTFYgb3IgYSBuZXcgb2JqZWN0IHR5cGUgZm9yIEJXLiAgSWYgd2Ug YWxsb3cgb3Vyc2VsdmVzIGEgbGliZXJhbCBpbnRlcnByZXRhdGlvbiBvZiByZmM1NDQwIHRoZW4g bGV0J3MgYXNzdW1lIHdlIGNhbiBhZGQgYSB0bHYuLi4NCg0KSnVzdCBteSBvcGluaW9uLCBvZiBj b3Vyc2UsIGFuZCBub3QgYSBwYXJ0aWN1bGFybHkgc3Ryb25nIG9uZQ0KDQpSYW1vbg0KDQotLQ0K DQpSYW1vbiBDYXNlbGxhcywgUGguRC4gLS0gU2VuaW9yIFJlc2VhcmNoIEFzc29jaWF0ZSAtLSBO ZXR3b3JrcyBEaXZpc2lvbg0KDQpPcHRpY2FsIE5ldHdvcmtzIGFuZCBTeXN0ZW1zIERlcGFydG1l bnQgLS0gaHR0cDovL3dpa2lvbmEuY3R0Yy5lcw0KDQpDVFRDIC0gQ2VudHJlIFRlY25vbMOyZ2lj IGRlIFRlbGVjb211bmljYWNpb25zIGRlIENhdGFsdW55YQ0KDQpQYXJjIE1lZGl0ZXJyYW5pIGRl IGxhIFRlY25vbG9naWEgKFBNVCkgLSBFZGlmaWNpIEI0DQoNCkF2LiBDYXJsIEZyaWVkcmljaCBH YXVzcywgNyAtIDA4ODYwIENhc3RlbGxkZWZlbHMgKEJhcmNlbG9uYSkgLSBTcGFpbg0KDQpUZWwu OiArMzQgOTMgNjQ1IDI5IDAwIGV4dCAyMTY4LS0gRmF4LiArMzQgOTMgNjQ1IDI5IDAxDQo= --_000_523C37072C291347B9730C9291CCA07D0D1A38DB3PRD0411MB427eu_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWwgeG1sbnM6dj0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTp2bWwiIHhtbG5zOm89InVy bjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206b2ZmaWNlOm9mZmljZSIgeG1sbnM6dz0idXJuOnNjaGVt YXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6d29yZCIgeG1sbnM6bT0iaHR0cDovL3NjaGVtYXMubWlj cm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9vZmZpY2UvMjAwNC8xMi9vbW1sIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcv VFIvUkVDLWh0bWw0MCI+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIg Y29udGVudD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9IkdlbmVyYXRv ciIgY29udGVudD0iTWljcm9zb2Z0IFdvcmQgMTIgKGZpbHRlcmVkIG1lZGl1bSkiPg0KPHN0eWxl PjwhLS0NCi8qIEZvbnQgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6 U2ltU3VuOw0KCXBhbm9zZS0xOjIgMSA2IDAgMyAxIDEgMSAxIDE7fQ0KQGZvbnQtZmFjZQ0KCXtm b250LWZhbWlseToiTVMgR290aGljIjsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDExIDYgOSA3IDIgNSA4IDIgNDt9 DQpAZm9udC1mYWNlDQoJe2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5Ok1pbmdMaVU7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6MiAyIDMgOSAw IDAgMCAwIDAgMDt9DQpAZm9udC1mYWNlDQoJe2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJDYW1icmlhIE1hdGgiOw0K CXBhbm9zZS0xOjIgNCA1IDMgNSA0IDYgMyAyIDQ7fQ0KQGZvbnQtZmFjZQ0KCXtmb250LWZhbWls eTpDYWxpYnJpOw0KCXBhbm9zZS0xOjIgMTUgNSAyIDIgMiA0IDMgMiA0O30NCkBmb250LWZhY2UN Cgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6VGFob21hOw0KCXBhbm9zZS0xOjIgMTEgNiA0IDMgNSA0IDQgMiA0O30N CkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6VmVyZGFuYTsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDExIDYgNCAz IDUgNCA0IDIgNDt9DQpAZm9udC1mYWNlDQoJe2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJcQFNpbVN1biI7DQoJcGFu b3NlLTE6MiAxIDYgMCAzIDEgMSAxIDEgMTt9DQpAZm9udC1mYWNlDQoJe2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJc QE1pbmdMaVUiOw0KCXBhbm9zZS0xOjIgMiAzIDkgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDA7fQ0KQGZvbnQtZmFjZQ0K CXtmb250LWZhbWlseToiXEBNUyBHb3RoaWMiOw0KCXBhbm9zZS0xOjIgMTEgNiA5IDcgMiA1IDgg MiA0O30NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6Ik1TIFVJIEdvdGhpYyI7DQoJcGFub3Nl LTE6MiAxMSA2IDAgNyAyIDUgOCAyIDQ7fQ0KQGZvbnQtZmFjZQ0KCXtmb250LWZhbWlseToiXEBN UyBVSSBHb3RoaWMiOw0KCXBhbm9zZS0xOjIgMTEgNiAwIDcgMiA1IDggMiA0O30NCi8qIFN0eWxl IERlZmluaXRpb25zICovDQpwLk1zb05vcm1hbCwgbGkuTXNvTm9ybWFsLCBkaXYuTXNvTm9ybWFs DQoJe21hcmdpbjowY207DQoJbWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTouMDAwMXB0Ow0KCWZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4w cHQ7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkNhbGlicmkiLCJzYW5zLXNlcmlmIjsNCgljb2xvcjpibGFjazt9 DQphOmxpbmssIHNwYW4uTXNvSHlwZXJsaW5rDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1wcmlvcml0eTo5OTsNCglj b2xvcjpibHVlOw0KCXRleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjp1bmRlcmxpbmU7fQ0KYTp2aXNpdGVkLCBzcGFu Lk1zb0h5cGVybGlua0ZvbGxvd2VkDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1wcmlvcml0eTo5OTsNCgljb2xvcjpw dXJwbGU7DQoJdGV4dC1kZWNvcmF0aW9uOnVuZGVybGluZTt9DQpwcmUNCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXBy aW9yaXR5Ojk5Ow0KCW1zby1zdHlsZS1saW5rOiJIVE1MIFByZWZvcm1hdHRlZCBDaGFyIjsNCglt YXJnaW46MGNtOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206LjAwMDFwdDsNCglmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0Ow0K CWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJDYWxpYnJpIiwic2Fucy1zZXJpZiI7DQoJY29sb3I6YmxhY2s7fQ0KcC5N c29BY2V0YXRlLCBsaS5Nc29BY2V0YXRlLCBkaXYuTXNvQWNldGF0ZQ0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtcHJp b3JpdHk6OTk7DQoJbXNvLXN0eWxlLWxpbms6IkJhbGxvb24gVGV4dCBDaGFyIjsNCgltYXJnaW46 MGNtOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206LjAwMDFwdDsNCglmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0Ow0KCWZvbnQt ZmFtaWx5OiJDYWxpYnJpIiwic2Fucy1zZXJpZiI7DQoJY29sb3I6YmxhY2s7fQ0KcC5Nc29MaXN0 UGFyYWdyYXBoLCBsaS5Nc29MaXN0UGFyYWdyYXBoLCBkaXYuTXNvTGlzdFBhcmFncmFwaA0KCXtt c28tc3R5bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6MzQ7DQoJbWFyZ2luLXRvcDowY207DQoJbWFyZ2luLXJpZ2h0OjBj bTsNCgltYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOjBjbTsNCgltYXJnaW4tbGVmdDozNi4wcHQ7DQoJbWFyZ2luLWJv dHRvbTouMDAwMXB0Ow0KCWZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkNhbGlicmki LCJzYW5zLXNlcmlmIjsNCgljb2xvcjpibGFjazt9DQpzcGFuLkhUTUxQcmVmb3JtYXR0ZWRDaGFy DQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1uYW1lOiJIVE1MIFByZWZvcm1hdHRlZCBDaGFyIjsNCgltc28tc3R5bGUt cHJpb3JpdHk6OTk7DQoJbXNvLXN0eWxlLWxpbms6IkhUTUwgUHJlZm9ybWF0dGVkIjsNCglmb250 LWZhbWlseToiQ291cmllciBOZXciO30NCnNwYW4uQmFsbG9vblRleHRDaGFyDQoJe21zby1zdHls ZS1uYW1lOiJCYWxsb29uIFRleHQgQ2hhciI7DQoJbXNvLXN0eWxlLXByaW9yaXR5Ojk5Ow0KCW1z by1zdHlsZS1saW5rOiJCYWxsb29uIFRleHQiOw0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJUYWhvbWEiLCJzYW5z LXNlcmlmIjt9DQpzcGFuLkhUTUxDaGFyDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1uYW1lOiJIVE1MIOmihOiuvuag vOW8jyBDaGFyIjsNCgltc28tc3R5bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6OTk7DQoJbXNvLXN0eWxlLWxpbms6IkhU TUwg6aKE6K6+5qC85byPIjsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToiQ291cmllciBOZXciOw0KCWNvbG9yOmJs YWNrO30NCnAuSFRNTCwgbGkuSFRNTCwgZGl2LkhUTUwNCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLW5hbWU6IkhUTUwg 6aKE6K6+5qC85byPIjsNCgltc28tc3R5bGUtbGluazoiSFRNTCDpooTorr7moLzlvI8gQ2hhciI7 DQoJbWFyZ2luOjBjbTsNCgltYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOi4wMDAxcHQ7DQoJZm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBw dDsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToiQ2FsaWJyaSIsInNhbnMtc2VyaWYiOw0KCWNvbG9yOmJsYWNrO30N CnNwYW4uQ2hhcg0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtbmFtZToi5om55rOo5qGG5paH5pysIENoYXIiOw0KCW1z by1zdHlsZS1wcmlvcml0eTo5OTsNCgltc28tc3R5bGUtbGluazrmibnms6jmoYbmlofmnKw7DQoJ Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkNhbGlicmkiLCJzYW5zLXNlcmlmIjsNCgljb2xvcjpibGFjazt9DQpwLmEs IGxpLmEsIGRpdi5hDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1uYW1lOuaJueazqOahhuaWh+acrDsNCgltc28tc3R5 bGUtbGluazoi5om55rOo5qGG5paH5pysIENoYXIiOw0KCW1hcmdpbjowY207DQoJbWFyZ2luLWJv dHRvbTouMDAwMXB0Ow0KCWZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkNhbGlicmki LCJzYW5zLXNlcmlmIjsNCgljb2xvcjpibGFjazt9DQpzcGFuLkVtYWlsU3R5bGUyNg0KCXttc28t c3R5bGUtdHlwZTpwZXJzb25hbDsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToiQ2FsaWJyaSIsInNhbnMtc2VyaWYi Ow0KCWNvbG9yOndpbmRvd3RleHQ7fQ0Kc3Bhbi5FbWFpbFN0eWxlMjcNCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXR5 cGU6cGVyc29uYWw7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkNhbGlicmkiLCJzYW5zLXNlcmlmIjsNCglmb250 LXZhcmlhbnQ6bm9ybWFsICFpbXBvcnRhbnQ7DQoJY29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RDsNCgl0ZXh0LXRyYW5z Zm9ybTpub25lOw0KCXRleHQtc2hhZG93Om5vbmU7DQoJdGV4dC1kZWNvcmF0aW9uOm5vbmUgbm9u ZTsNCgl2ZXJ0aWNhbC1hbGlnbjpiYXNlbGluZTt9DQpzcGFuLkVtYWlsU3R5bGUyOA0KCXttc28t c3R5bGUtdHlwZTpwZXJzb25hbDsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToiQ2FsaWJyaSIsInNhbnMtc2VyaWYi Ow0KCWNvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0Q7fQ0Kc3Bhbi5FbWFpbFN0eWxlMjkNCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXR5cGU6 cGVyc29uYWw7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkNhbGlicmkiLCJzYW5zLXNlcmlmIjsNCgljb2xvcjoj MUY0OTdEO30NCnNwYW4uRW1haWxTdHlsZTMwDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS10eXBlOnBlcnNvbmFsOw0K CWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJDYWxpYnJpIiwic2Fucy1zZXJpZiI7DQoJZm9udC12YXJpYW50Om5vcm1h bCAhaW1wb3J0YW50Ow0KCWNvbG9yOiM5OTMzNjY7DQoJdGV4dC10cmFuc2Zvcm06bm9uZTsNCgl0 ZXh0LXNoYWRvdzpub25lOw0KCXRleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjpub25lIG5vbmU7DQoJdmVydGljYWwt YWxpZ246YmFzZWxpbmU7fQ0Kc3Bhbi5FbWFpbFN0eWxlMzENCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXR5cGU6cGVy c29uYWw7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkNhbGlicmkiLCJzYW5zLXNlcmlmIjsNCgljb2xvcjojMUY0 OTdEO30NCnNwYW4uRW1haWxTdHlsZTMyDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS10eXBlOnBlcnNvbmFsLXJlcGx5 Ow0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJDYWxpYnJpIiwic2Fucy1zZXJpZiI7DQoJZm9udC12YXJpYW50Om5v cm1hbCAhaW1wb3J0YW50Ow0KCWNvbG9yOiMwMDMzMDA7DQoJdGV4dC10cmFuc2Zvcm06bm9uZTsN Cgl0ZXh0LXNoYWRvdzpub25lOw0KCXRleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjpub25lIG5vbmU7DQoJdmVydGlj YWwtYWxpZ246YmFzZWxpbmU7fQ0KLk1zb0NocERlZmF1bHQNCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXR5cGU6ZXhw b3J0LW9ubHk7DQoJZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDt9DQpAcGFnZSBXb3JkU2VjdGlvbjENCgl7c2l6 ZTo2MTIuMHB0IDc5Mi4wcHQ7DQoJbWFyZ2luOjcyLjBwdCA3Mi4wcHQgNzIuMHB0IDcyLjBwdDt9 DQpkaXYuV29yZFNlY3Rpb24xDQoJe3BhZ2U6V29yZFNlY3Rpb24xO30NCi8qIExpc3QgRGVmaW5p dGlvbnMgKi8NCkBsaXN0IGwwDQoJe21zby1saXN0LWlkOjEzOTk1NDgyMTE7DQoJbXNvLWxpc3Qt dHlwZTpoeWJyaWQ7DQoJbXNvLWxpc3QtdGVtcGxhdGUtaWRzOi01MjgxNjQwMjYgNjc2OTg3MDUg Njc2OTg3MTMgNjc2OTg3MTUgNjc2OTg3MDMgNjc2OTg3MTMgNjc2OTg3MTUgNjc2OTg3MDMgNjc2 OTg3MTMgNjc2OTg3MTU7fQ0KQGxpc3QgbDA6bGV2ZWwxDQoJe21zby1sZXZlbC10ZXh0OiIlMVwp IjsNCgltc28tbGV2ZWwtdGFiLXN0b3A6bm9uZTsNCgltc28tbGV2ZWwtbnVtYmVyLXBvc2l0aW9u OmxlZnQ7DQoJdGV4dC1pbmRlbnQ6LTE4LjBwdDt9DQpAbGlzdCBsMDpsZXZlbDINCgl7bXNvLWxl dmVsLXRhYi1zdG9wOjcyLjBwdDsNCgltc28tbGV2ZWwtbnVtYmVyLXBvc2l0aW9uOmxlZnQ7DQoJ dGV4dC1pbmRlbnQ6LTE4LjBwdDt9DQpAbGlzdCBsMDpsZXZlbDMNCgl7bXNvLWxldmVsLXRhYi1z dG9wOjEwOC4wcHQ7DQoJbXNvLWxldmVsLW51bWJlci1wb3NpdGlvbjpsZWZ0Ow0KCXRleHQtaW5k ZW50Oi0xOC4wcHQ7fQ0KQGxpc3QgbDA6bGV2ZWw0DQoJe21zby1sZXZlbC10YWItc3RvcDoxNDQu MHB0Ow0KCW1zby1sZXZlbC1udW1iZXItcG9zaXRpb246bGVmdDsNCgl0ZXh0LWluZGVudDotMTgu MHB0O30NCkBsaXN0IGwwOmxldmVsNQ0KCXttc28tbGV2ZWwtdGFiLXN0b3A6MTgwLjBwdDsNCglt c28tbGV2ZWwtbnVtYmVyLXBvc2l0aW9uOmxlZnQ7DQoJdGV4dC1pbmRlbnQ6LTE4LjBwdDt9DQpA bGlzdCBsMDpsZXZlbDYNCgl7bXNvLWxldmVsLXRhYi1zdG9wOjIxNi4wcHQ7DQoJbXNvLWxldmVs LW51bWJlci1wb3NpdGlvbjpsZWZ0Ow0KCXRleHQtaW5kZW50Oi0xOC4wcHQ7fQ0KQGxpc3QgbDA6 bGV2ZWw3DQoJe21zby1sZXZlbC10YWItc3RvcDoyNTIuMHB0Ow0KCW1zby1sZXZlbC1udW1iZXIt cG9zaXRpb246bGVmdDsNCgl0ZXh0LWluZGVudDotMTguMHB0O30NCkBsaXN0IGwwOmxldmVsOA0K CXttc28tbGV2ZWwtdGFiLXN0b3A6Mjg4LjBwdDsNCgltc28tbGV2ZWwtbnVtYmVyLXBvc2l0aW9u OmxlZnQ7DQoJdGV4dC1pbmRlbnQ6LTE4LjBwdDt9DQpAbGlzdCBsMDpsZXZlbDkNCgl7bXNvLWxl dmVsLXRhYi1zdG9wOjMyNC4wcHQ7DQoJbXNvLWxldmVsLW51bWJlci1wb3NpdGlvbjpsZWZ0Ow0K CXRleHQtaW5kZW50Oi0xOC4wcHQ7fQ0Kb2wNCgl7bWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTowY207fQ0KdWwNCgl7 bWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTowY207fQ0KLS0+PC9zdHlsZT48IS0tW2lmIGd0ZSBtc28gOV0+PHhtbD4N CjxvOnNoYXBlZGVmYXVsdHMgdjpleHQ9ImVkaXQiIHNwaWRtYXg9IjEwMjYiIC8+DQo8L3htbD48 IVtlbmRpZl0tLT48IS0tW2lmIGd0ZSBtc28gOV0+PHhtbD4NCjxvOnNoYXBlbGF5b3V0IHY6ZXh0 PSJlZGl0Ij4NCjxvOmlkbWFwIHY6ZXh0PSJlZGl0IiBkYXRhPSIxIiAvPg0KPC9vOnNoYXBlbGF5 b3V0PjwveG1sPjwhW2VuZGlmXS0tPg0KPC9oZWFkPg0KPGJvZHkgYmdjb2xvcj0id2hpdGUiIGxh bmc9IkVOLVVTIiBsaW5rPSJibHVlIiB2bGluaz0icHVycGxlIj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9IldvcmRT ZWN0aW9uMSI+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6IzAwMzMw MCI+QWRyaWFuLCBhbGw8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFs Ij48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6IzAwMzMwMCI+UGxlYXNlIHNlZSBpbmxpbmU8bzpwPjwvbzpw Pjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8ZGl2IHN0eWxlPSJib3JkZXI6bm9uZTtib3JkZXItbGVmdDpzb2xpZCBi bHVlIDEuNXB0O3BhZGRpbmc6MGNtIDBjbSAwY20gNC4wcHQiPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXYgc3R5bGU9 ImJvcmRlcjpub25lO2JvcmRlci10b3A6c29saWQgI0I1QzRERiAxLjBwdDtwYWRkaW5nOjMuMHB0 IDBjbSAwY20gMGNtIj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250 LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O1RhaG9tYSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNl cmlmJnF1b3Q7O2NvbG9yOndpbmRvd3RleHQiPkZyb206PC9zcGFuPjwvYj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0i Zm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtUYWhvbWEmcXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fu cy1zZXJpZiZxdW90Oztjb2xvcjp3aW5kb3d0ZXh0Ij4gQWRyaWFuIEZhcnJlbCBbbWFpbHRvOmFk cmlhbkBvbGRkb2cuY28udWtdDQo8YnI+DQo8Yj5TZW50OjwvYj4gV2VkbmVzZGF5LCBKdWx5IDMx LCAyMDEzIDM6NDYgUE08YnI+DQo8Yj5Ubzo8L2I+IE1hcmdhcmlhLCBDeXJpbCAoQ29yaWFudCAt IERFL011bmljaCk7ICdGYXRhaSBaaGFuZyc7ICdSYW1vbiBDYXNlbGxhcyc7ICdKb25hdGhhbiBI YXJkd2ljayc7IHBjZUBpZXRmLm9yZzxicj4NCjxiPlN1YmplY3Q6PC9iPiBCYW5kd2lkdGg6IENv bW1lbnRzIG9uIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtcGNlLWdtcGxzLXBjZXAtZXh0ZW5zaW9ucy0wODxvOnA+PC9v OnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48bzpw PiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLUdC IiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+SGkgQ3lyaWwsPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0K PHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tR0IiIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjojMUY0 OTdEIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48 c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1HQiIgc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPlRoYW5rcyBmb3IgcmFpc2lu ZyB0aGUgcXVlc3Rpb24uPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1h bCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tR0IiIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwv bzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1HQiIg c3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPkJlZm9yZSBnZXR0aW5nIG9uIHRvIGRpc2N1c3MgaG93IHRv IG1ha2UgdGhlIGNoYW5nZSwgd2UgbmVlZCB0byBkaWcgbW9yZSBpbnRvICZxdW90O3doeSB0byBt YWtlIHRoZSBjaGFuZ2UmcXVvdDsuPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1z b05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tR0IiIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj48bzpwPiZu YnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJF Ti1HQiIgc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPkkgd2VudCBzdHJhaWdodCB0byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0 IHRyeWluZyB0byBmaW5kIHRoZSByZWFzb25pbmcuPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAg Y2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tR0IiIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdE Ij5JbiAxLjMgSSBmb3VuZC4uLjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29O b3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLUdCIiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+Jm5ic3A7Jm5i c3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7IFtSRkM1NDQwXSBkb2VzIG5vdCBpbmNsdWRlIHRoZSBhYmlsaXR5IHRv PG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0i RU4tR0IiIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj4mbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJz cDsgY29udmV5IGEgKEludHNlcnYpIFRTUEVDIG9iamVjdC48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+ DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1HQiIgc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiMx RjQ5N0QiPkkgcHJvYmFibHkgbWFkZSB0aGUgbWlzdGFrZSBvZiBzdG9wcGluZyB3aGVuIEkgcmVh Y2hlZCB0aGlzIHRleHQuPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1h bCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tR0IiIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj5UaGUgdGV4dCBpcyBj b21wbGV0ZWx5IHRydWUhPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1h bCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tR0IiIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj5Ib3dldmVyLCA1NDQw IHdhcyB3aWxmdWwgaW4gaXRzIGNob2ljZSB0byBub3Qgc3VwcG9ydCBJbnRzZXJ2IG9uIHRoZSB1 bmRlcnN0YW5kaW5nICh3aGljaCBtaWdodCBub3QgYmUgdHJ1ZSBhbnltb3JlLCBidXQgcHJvYmFi bHkgaXMpIHRoYXQgbm8tb25lIHVzZXMgSW50c2VydiBUU3BlYyBpbiB0aGVpciBNUExTLVRFIG9y IEdNUExTIGltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9ucy48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0i TXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1HQiIgc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPjxvOnA+ Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9 IkVOLUdCIiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+KklmKiBJbnRzZXJ2IGlzIHRoZSBvbmx5IHJl YXNvbiBmb3IgdGhlIGRpc2N1c3Npb24gb2YgY2hhbmdpbmcgdGhlIEJhbmR3aWR0aCBvYmplY3Qs IHdlIHNob3VsZCBkcm9wIHRoZSBkaXNjdXNzaW9uLCBJTUhPLjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwv cD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLUdCIiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6 IzFGNDk3RCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1h bCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tR0IiIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj5JIHRoZW4gd2VudCB0 byBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLXBjZS1nbXBscy1hcHMtcmVxIGFuZCBzZWFyY2hlZCBmb3IgJnF1b3Q7YmFu ZHdpZHRoJnF1b3Q7IGFuZCB0aGUgb25seSBkaXNjdXNzaW9uIEkgZm91bmQgd2FzIHdpdGggcmVz cGVjdCB0byB0aGUgYXN5bW1ldHJpY2FsIHJlcXVpcmVtZW50cy48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48 L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1HQiIgc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9y OiMxRjQ5N0QiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3Jt YWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLUdCIiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8 L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tR0Ii IHN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj5BdCB0aGUgbWljLCBDeXJpbCBhbmQgRmF0YWkgaGVscGVk IG1lIHRvIHVuZGVyc3RhbmQgdGhhdCB0aGUgcmVxdWlyZW1lbnQgaXMgbm90IHNwZWNpZmljIHRv IGJhbmR3aWR0aCwgYnV0IGlzIHJlbGF0ZWQgdG8gVHJhZmZpYyBQYXJhbWV0ZXJzIHRoYXQgd2ls bCBiZSBzaWduYWxlZC4gVGhpcyBicmVha3MgdGhlIHByb2JsZW0gb3V0IGludG8NCiB0aHJlZSBk aWZmZXJlbnQgdXNlIGNhc2VzOjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29O b3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLUdCIiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+PG86cD4mbmJz cDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4t R0IiIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj4xLiBUaGUgUENDIHdpc2hlcyB0byByZXF1ZXN0ICpi YW5kd2lkdGgqLiBJdCBkb2VzIG5vdCBtaW5kIGl0IGdldHMgYSBmYXQgcGlwZSBvciBWQ0FULCBh IGxhbWJkYSBvciBPVE4uPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1h bCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tR0IiIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj4yLiBUaGUgUENDIHdh bnRzIGJhbmR3aWR0aCwgYnV0ICpkb2VzKiBjYXJlIGFib3V0IGhvdyB0aGlzIHN1cHBsaWVkIGlu IHRoZSBuZXR3b3JrLiBUaGlzIG1ha2VzIHRoZSByZXF1ZXN0OjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwv cD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLUdCIiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6 IzFGNDk3RCI+Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7IGkuIGxheWVyLXNwZWNpZmljPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+ PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tR0IiIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xv cjojMUY0OTdEIj4mbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsgaWkuIHN1Yi1sYXllci1zcGVjaWZpYzxvOnA+PC9vOnA+ PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLUdCIiBzdHls ZT0iY29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7IGlpaS4gbGFiZWwtc3BlY2lmaWM8bzpwPjwv bzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1HQiIg c3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPjMuIFRoZSBQQ0Ugd2FudHMgdG8gY29udmV5IGluZm9ybWF0 aW9uIHRvIHRoZSBQQ0MgYWJvdXQgd2hhdCBkZXRhaWxzIGl0IG5lZWRzIHRvIHBsYWNlIGluIHNp Z25hbGluZy48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3Bh biBsYW5nPSJFTi1HQiIgc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9z cGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLUdCIiBzdHlsZT0i Y29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+TXkgdmlldyBpcyB0aGF0IHRoZSBCYW5kd2lkdGggb2JqZWN0IGlzIG5v dCBjYWxsZWQgdGhlICZxdW90O1NlbmRlci1UU3BlYyBvYmplY3QgZm9yIHVzZSBpZiB0aGUgUEND IGp1c3QgaGFwcGVucyB0byBiZSB0aGUgaW5ncmVzcyBub2RlIG9mIGEgR01QTFMgTFNQJnF1b3Q7 IG9iamVjdCEgTXkgdmlldyBpcyB0aGF0IHRoZSBiYW5kd2lkdGggb2JqZWN0IGRlc2NyaWJlcw0K IHRoZSBiYW5kd2lkdGggdGhhdCBoYXMgYmVlbiByZXF1ZXN0ZWQsIGFuZCB0aGUgYmFuZHdpZHRo IHRoYXQgdGhlIHN1cHBsaWVkIHBhdGggd2lsbCBhY3R1YWxseSBiZSBhYmxlIHRvIHN1cHBseSAo bWF5IGJlICZndDssID0sIG9yICZsdDsgcmVxdWVzdGVkIGIvdykuPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+ PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tR0IiIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xv cjojMDAzMzAwIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9y bWFsIj48Yj48aT48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1HQiIgc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiMwMDMzMDAiPltbTWFy Z2FyaWEuQ11dIEkgaGF2ZSB0aGUgc2FtZSB1bmRlcnN0YW5kaW5nIG9uIHRoZSBzZW1hbnRpYywg YnV0IG5vdCBvbiB0aGUgZW5jb2RpbmcuIEZvciBzb21lIFBDQyAoY29ycmVzcG9uZGluZyB0byAy LWkpIGhhdmluZyBhIGZsb2F0aW5nIHBvaW50IG9ubHkgd2lsbCBtYWtlIGhpbSB0cmFuc2xhdGUg dGhhdCBpbiBpdHMgbGF5ZXINCiBiYW5kd2lkdGgsIHdoaWNoIG1heSBiZSBzb21ldGltZSB0aGUg cmlnaHQgdHJhbnNsYXRpb24uPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9pPjwvYj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFz cz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48Yj48aT48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1HQiIgc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiMwMDMz MDAiPkkgdW5kZXJzdGFuZCB0aGUgY3VycmVudCBlbmNvZGluZyBhcyBiYW5kd2lkdGggZm9yIHNv bWUgcGFja2V0LXBhY2tldCBiYXNlZCB0ZWNobm9sb2d5LCBidXQgaXQgaXMgbm90IGFkZXF1YXRl IGZvciBhbGwgdGVjaG5vbG9naWVzLTxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvaT48L2I+PC9wPg0KPHAg Y2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PGI+PGk+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tR0IiIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjoj MDAzMzAwIj48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L2k+PC9iPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3Jt YWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLUdCIiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+VGh1cywgSU1ITywg aWYgd2Ugd2FudCB0byBjb25zdHJhaW4gdGhlIHJlcXVlc3QgdG8gcmV0dXJuIHBhdGhzIHRoYXQg dXNlIGEgbGltaXRlZCBzZXQgb2YgdGhlIGF2YWlsYWJsZSBuZXR3b3JrIHJlc291cmNlcywgd2Ug bmVlZCB0byBhZGQgdGhpcyB0aHJvdWdoIG90aGVyIG9iamVjdHMuPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+ PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tR0IiIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xv cjojMDAzMzAwIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9y bWFsIj48Yj48aT48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1HQiIgc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiMwMDMzMDAiPltbTWFy Z2FyaWEuQ11dIFRoYXQgd291bGQgd29yaywgYnV0IEkgdGhpbmsgdGhhdCBoYXZpbmcgYSBuZXcg Q1R5cGUgdG8gY29udmV5IGRpZmZlcmVudCBlbmNvZGluZyBvZiB0aGUgYmFuZHdpZHRoIHdvdWxk IGJlIGJldHRlci4gVGhpcyB3b3VsZCBhbGxvdyB0byByZXF1ZXN0IHRvIHJlcXVlc3QgYSBWQzQg YW5kIGdldCBhIHB3ZQ0KIGJhbmR3aWR0aCAodXNlIGNhc2UgMSkuIFRoZSBjb25zdHJhaW5pbmcg dG8gbGF5ZXJzIGlzIGFkZHJlc3NlZCBpbiB0aGUgaW50ZXItbGF5ZXIgZHJhZnQuPG86cD48L286 cD48L3NwYW4+PC9pPjwvYj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJF Ti1HQiIgc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiMwMDMzMDAiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4N CjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLUdCIiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6IzFG NDk3RCI+QW5kIGlmIHdlIHdhbnQgdG8gZ2l2ZSBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiB0byB0aGUgUENDIHRoYXQg aXQgY2FuIG1hcCB0byBzcGVjaWZpYyBkZXRhaWxzIGluIHRoZSBzaWduYWxpbmcgcHJvdG9jb2ws IHRoZW4gd2Ugc2hvdWxkIHByb3ZpZGUgdGhhdCBkZXRhaWwgaW4gb2JqZWN0cyBzcGVjaWZpY2Fs bHkgaW50ZW5kZWQgdG8gY2FycnkgdGhhdCBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbi4mbmJzcDsNCiBUaGlzIGluZm9y bWF0aW9uIGlzIGNsZWFybHkgcmVsYXRlZCB0byBiYW5kd2lkdGgsIGJ1dCBpdCBpcyBub3QgdGhl IHNhbWUgYXMgYmFuZHdpZHRoPC9zcGFuPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLUdCIiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6 IzAwMzMwMCI+PG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PGI+ PGk+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tR0IiIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjojMDAzMzAwIj5bW01hcmdhcmlhLkNd XSBJdHMgbm90IHNwZWNpZmljIHRvIHRoZSBzaWduYWxsaW5nIHByb3RvY29sIHBlciBzZSAoYWx0 aG91Z2ggd2UgYXJlIHVzaW5nIG9uZSBwcm90b2NvbCBlbmNvZGluZyksIGl0IGlzIHNwZWNpZmlj IHRvIHRoZSBsYXllciB1c2VkLCBhbmQgdGhpcyBpcyBhZGRyZXNzZWQgaW4gQ0NBTVAgZHJhZnQt emhhbmctY2NhbXAtZ21wbHMtaC1sc3AtbWxuDQogKGFuZCBpcyBjdXJyZW50bHkgYWRkcmVzc2Vk IGluIGFub3RoZXIgd2F5IGluIHRoZSBpbnRlci1sYXllciBmb3IgdGhhdCBtYXR0ZXIpLjxvOnA+ PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvaT48L2I+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gbGFu Zz0iRU4tR0IiIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjojMDAzMzAwIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48 L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1HQiIgc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9y OiMxRjQ5N0QiPkp1c3QgbXkg4oKsMC4wMjwvc3Bhbj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJFTi1HQiIgc3R5bGU9 ImNvbG9yOiMwMDMzMDAiPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3Jt YWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLUdCIiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+QWRyaWFuPG86cD48 L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iRU4tR0Ii IHN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8ZGl2 IHN0eWxlPSJib3JkZXI6bm9uZTtib3JkZXItbGVmdDpzb2xpZCBibHVlIDEuNXB0O3BhZGRpbmc6 MGNtIDBjbSAwY20gNC4wcHQiPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXYgc3R5bGU9ImJvcmRlcjpub25lO2JvcmRl ci10b3A6c29saWQgI0I1QzRERiAxLjBwdDtwYWRkaW5nOjMuMHB0IDBjbSAwY20gMGNtIj4NCjxw IGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O2ZvbnQt ZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O1RhaG9tYSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7O2NvbG9yOndp bmRvd3RleHQiPkZyb206PC9zcGFuPjwvYj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDtm b250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtUYWhvbWEmcXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZxdW90Oztjb2xv cjp3aW5kb3d0ZXh0Ij4NCjxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpwY2UtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZyI+cGNl LWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmc8L2E+IFs8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86cGNlLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5v cmciPm1haWx0bzpwY2UtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZzwvYT5dDQo8Yj5PbiBCZWhhbGYgT2YgPC9i Pk1hcmdhcmlhLCBDeXJpbCAoQ29yaWFudCAtIERFL011bmljaCk8YnI+DQo8Yj5TZW50OjwvYj4g MzAgSnVseSAyMDEzIDE3OjMzPGJyPg0KPGI+VG86PC9iPiBGYXRhaSBaaGFuZzsgUmFtb24gQ2Fz ZWxsYXM7IEpvbmF0aGFuIEhhcmR3aWNrOyA8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86cGNlQGlldGYub3JnIj4N CnBjZUBpZXRmLm9yZzwvYT48YnI+DQo8Yj5TdWJqZWN0OjwvYj4gUmU6IFtQY2VdIDwvc3Bhbj48 c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtNUyBVSSBHb3Ro aWMmcXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZxdW90Oztjb2xvcjp3aW5kb3d0ZXh0Ij7nrZTlpI08 L3NwYW4+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7VGFo b21hJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDs7Y29sb3I6d2luZG93dGV4dCI+OiBDb21t ZW50cyBvbiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLXBjZS1nbXBscy1wY2VwLWV4dGVuc2lvbnMtMDg8bzpwPjwvbzpw Pjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4g bGFuZz0iRU4tR0IiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29O b3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjojOTkzMzY2Ij5IaSBQQ0UgV0csIDxvOnA+PC9vOnA+ PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjojOTkz MzY2Ij48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48 c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6Izk5MzM2NiI+VGhlIFByb2JsZW0gd2UgaGFkIHdpdGggdGhlIEJB TkRXSURUSCAoYW5kIExPQUQtQkFMQU5DSU5HIEJUVykgb2JqZWN0IGlzIHRoYXQgUkZDNTQ0MCBz ZWN0aW9uIDcuNyBkZWZpbmVzDQo8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNv Tm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6Izk5MzM2NiI+4oCcVGhlIEJBTkRXSURUSCBvYmpl Y3QgYm9keSBoYXMgYSBmaXhlZCBsZW5ndGggb2YgNCBieXRlcy7igJ08bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bh bj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6Izk5MzM2NiI+ PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4g c3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiM5OTMzNjYiPlJGQzU0NDAgZGVmaW5lcyB0d28gT1QgOiAxIGFuZCAyLiBU aGUgdGV4dCBjYW4gYmUgaW50ZXJwcmV0ZWQgYXMgYWxsIE9UIChjdXJyZW50IGFuZCBmdXR1cmUp IHNob3VsZCBoYXZlIGxlbmd0aCA9IDQsIHRoaXMgaXMgbm90IGZ1dHVyZSBmcmllbmRseS48bzpw PjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iY29s b3I6Izk5MzM2NiI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05v cm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiM5OTMzNjYiPk5vdyBzZXZlcmFsIG9wdGlvbnMgY2Fu IGJlIGNvbnNpZGVyZWQgOiZuYnNwOw0KPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9 Ik1zb0xpc3RQYXJhZ3JhcGgiIHN0eWxlPSJ0ZXh0LWluZGVudDotMTguMHB0O21zby1saXN0Omww IGxldmVsMSBsZm8yIj48IVtpZiAhc3VwcG9ydExpc3RzXT48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6Izk5 MzM2NiI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9Im1zby1saXN0Oklnbm9yZSI+MSk8c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udDo3 LjBwdCAmcXVvdDtUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4mcXVvdDsiPiZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNw OyZuYnNwOw0KPC9zcGFuPjwvc3Bhbj48L3NwYW4+PCFbZW5kaWZdPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xv cjojOTkzMzY2Ij5HTVBMUy1wY2VwIGV4dGVuc2lvbnMgOiBuZXcgb2JqZWN0LCBrZWVwIGV4aXN0 aW5nIGltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9uIHVudG91Y2hlZCwgYXQgdGhlIGV4cGVuc2Ugb2YgdGhlIGdtcGxz IG9uZXMgKG1vcmUgY29tcGxleCBydWxlcykNCjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNs YXNzPSJNc29MaXN0UGFyYWdyYXBoIiBzdHlsZT0idGV4dC1pbmRlbnQ6LTE4LjBwdDttc28tbGlz dDpsMCBsZXZlbDEgbGZvMiI+PCFbaWYgIXN1cHBvcnRMaXN0c10+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9y OiM5OTMzNjYiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJtc28tbGlzdDpJZ25vcmUiPjIpPHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZv bnQ6Ny4wcHQgJnF1b3Q7VGltZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFuJnF1b3Q7Ij4mbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsm bmJzcDsmbmJzcDsNCjwvc3Bhbj48L3NwYW4+PC9zcGFuPjwhW2VuZGlmXT48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0i Y29sb3I6Izk5MzM2NiI+QWxsb3cgVExWIGluIHRoZSBCQU5EV0lEVEgNCjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9z cGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29MaXN0UGFyYWdyYXBoIiBzdHlsZT0idGV4dC1pbmRlbnQ6 LTE4LjBwdDttc28tbGlzdDpsMCBsZXZlbDEgbGZvMiI+PCFbaWYgIXN1cHBvcnRMaXN0c10+PHNw YW4gc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiM5OTMzNjYiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJtc28tbGlzdDpJZ25vcmUiPjMp PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQ6Ny4wcHQgJnF1b3Q7VGltZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFuJnF1b3Q7Ij4mbmJz cDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsNCjwvc3Bhbj48L3NwYW4+PC9zcGFuPjwhW2VuZGlm XT48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6Izk5MzM2NiI+VHJlYXQgdGhpcyBhcyBhbiBlcnJhdGEgdG8g UkZDNTQ0MCDigJzigJxUaGUgQkFORFdJRFRIDQo8Yj5vZiBPVCAxIGFuZCBPVCAyPC9iPiAmbmJz cDtvYmplY3QgYm9keSBoYXZlIGEgZml4ZWQgbGVuZ3RoIG9mIDQgYnl0ZXMu4oCdLCBhbmQgZGVm aW5lIG5ldyBPVCBmb3IgR01QTFM8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNv Tm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6Izk5MzM2NiI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3Nw YW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiM5OTMzNjYi PlRoZSBDb25zIG9mIDEgaXMgZGlzY3Vzc2VkIGJlbG93LjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4N CjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjojOTkzMzY2Ij5UaGUgY29u cyBvZiB0aGUgVExWIHdvdWxkIGJlIHRvIGNoYW5nZSBleGlzdGluZyBvYmplY3QgZGVmaW5pdGlv biBhbmQgbWFrZSB0aGUgcHJvdG9jb2wgZGVmaW5pdGlvbiByYXRoZXIgYXdrd2FyZCA6IGRpZmZl cmVudCBPYmplY3QgZm9ybWF0IGRlcGVuZGluZyBvbiBPUEVOIChmb3IgZXhhbXBsZSkgbmVnb3Rp YXRpb24gYW5kIHdvdWxkIG5vdCBoZWxwIGZvciBuZXcNCiBDVHlwZXM8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bh bj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6Izk5MzM2NiI+ PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4g c3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiM5OTMzNjYiPldpdGggMykgdGhlIGV4aXN0aW5nIGltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9u IGZvciBleGlzdGluZyBDVHlwZSB3aWxsIHNlZSBubyBjaGFuZ2UsIGl0IG1heSBiZSBhIHByb2Js ZW0gZm9yIG5ldyBDVHlwZXMgKGFueWhvdyBub3Qgc3VwcG9ydGVkKSwgYnV0IGFuIGltcGxlbWVu dGF0aW9uIG1heSByZXR1cm4gYW4gVW5rbm93IG9iamVjdCwgdW5rbm93biBvYmplY3QgdHlwZSBP Ug0KIHRyZWF0ZWQgYXMgaW52YWxpZCBvYmplY3QuIFRoaXMgY2FuIGJlIHNvbHZlZCBieSBuZWdv dGlhdGluZyB0aGUgdXNlIG9mIE9UJmd0OzIgZm9yIEJBTkRXSURUSCAoYW5kIExPQUQtQkFMQU5D SU5HKTxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0 eWxlPSJjb2xvcjojOTkzMzY2Ij48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFz cz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6Izk5MzM2NiI+Rm9yIHRoZSBzYWtlIG9m IGRpc2N1c3Npb24gSSBhdHRhY2ggYSBzbGlkZXNldCBpZiBieSBhbnkgY2hhbmNlIHRoZXJlIGlz IHNvbWUgdGltZSBsZWZ0IGR1cmluZyB0aGUgc2Vzc2lvbiw8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+ DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6Izk5MzM2NiI+PG86cD4m bmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9 ImNvbG9yOiM5OTMzNjYiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJN c29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjojOTkzMzY2Ij48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwv c3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6Izk5MzM2 NiI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNw YW4gc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiM5OTMzNjYiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxw IGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjojOTkzMzY2Ij48bzpwPiZuYnNw OzwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iY29s b3I6Izk5MzM2NiI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05v cm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiM5OTMzNjYiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFu PjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkRFIiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1z aXplOjEwLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtWZXJkYW5hJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2Vy aWYmcXVvdDs7Y29sb3I6Izk5MzM2NiI+TWl0IGZyZXVuZGxpY2hlbiBHcsO8w59lbiAvIEJlc3Qg UmVnYXJkczwvc3Bhbj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJERSIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMi4wcHQ7Zm9u dC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7VGltZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFuJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3NlcmlmJnF1b3Q7O2Nv bG9yOiM5OTMzNjYiPg0KPGJyPg0KPC9zcGFuPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkRFIiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1z aXplOjEwLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtWZXJkYW5hJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2Vy aWYmcXVvdDs7Y29sb3I6Izk5MzM2NiI+Q3lyaWwgTWFyZ2FyaWE8L3NwYW4+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0i REUiIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTIuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O1RpbWVzIE5ldyBS b21hbiZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzZXJpZiZxdW90Oztjb2xvcjojOTkzMzY2Ij4NCjwvc3Bhbj48c3Bh biBsYW5nPSJERSIgc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiM5OTMzNjYiPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4N CjxkaXYgc3R5bGU9ImJvcmRlcjpub25lO2JvcmRlci1sZWZ0OnNvbGlkIGJsdWUgMS41cHQ7cGFk ZGluZzowY20gMGNtIDBjbSA0LjBwdCI+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBzdHlsZT0iYm9yZGVyOm5vbmU7 Ym9yZGVyLXRvcDpzb2xpZCAjQjVDNERGIDEuMHB0O3BhZGRpbmc6My4wcHQgMGNtIDBjbSAwY20i Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PGI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC4wcHQ7 Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7VGFob21hJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDs7Y29s b3I6d2luZG93dGV4dCI+RnJvbTo8L3NwYW4+PC9iPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAu MHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O1RhaG9tYSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7 O2NvbG9yOndpbmRvd3RleHQiPg0KPGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOnBjZS1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3Jn Ij5wY2UtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZzwvYT4gWzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpwY2UtYm91bmNlc0Bp ZXRmLm9yZyI+bWFpbHRvOnBjZS1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnPC9hPl0NCjxiPk9uIEJlaGFsZiBP ZiA8L2I+RmF0YWkgWmhhbmc8YnI+DQo8Yj5TZW50OjwvYj4gVHVlc2RheSwgSnVseSAzMCwgMjAx MyAyOjQxIFBNPGJyPg0KPGI+VG86PC9iPiBSYW1vbiBDYXNlbGxhczsgSm9uYXRoYW4gSGFyZHdp Y2s7IDxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpwY2VAaWV0Zi5vcmciPnBjZUBpZXRmLm9yZzwvYT48YnI+DQo8 Yj5TdWJqZWN0OjwvYj4gW1BjZV0gPC9zcGFuPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0 O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O01TIFVJIEdvdGhpYyZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1 b3Q7O2NvbG9yOndpbmRvd3RleHQiPuetlOWkjTwvc3Bhbj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXpl OjEwLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtUYWhvbWEmcXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZx dW90Oztjb2xvcjp3aW5kb3d0ZXh0Ij46IENvbW1lbnRzIG9uIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtcGNlLWdtcGxz LXBjZXAtZXh0ZW5zaW9ucy0wODxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+ DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJN c29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuNXB0O2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPkhp IGFsbCw8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBz dHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjVwdDtjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwv c3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEw LjVwdDtjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj5JIHRoaW5rIGEgbmV3IG9iamVjdCB0eXBlIGNvdWxkIGJlIGJl dHRlciBhbmQgc2ltcGxlLjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3Jt YWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuNXB0O2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPjxvOnA+Jm5i c3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJm b250LXNpemU6MTAuNXB0O2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPlRoYW5rczxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwv cD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuNXB0O2Nv bG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29O b3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuNXB0O2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPkZhdGFp PG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9 ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC41cHQ7Y29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+ PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC41cHQ7 Y29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXYg c3R5bGU9ImJvcmRlcjpub25lO2JvcmRlci10b3A6c29saWQgI0I1QzRERiAxLjBwdDtwYWRkaW5n OjMuMHB0IDBjbSAwY20gMGNtIj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9 IlpILUNOIiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTpNaW5nTGlVO2NvbG9y OndpbmRvd3RleHQiPuWPkeS7tuS6ujwvc3Bhbj48L2I+PGI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6 ZToxMC4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6U2ltU3VuO2NvbG9yOndpbmRvd3RleHQiPjo8L3NwYW4+PC9i PjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OlNpbVN1bjtjb2xvcjp3 aW5kb3d0ZXh0Ij4NCjxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpwY2UtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZyI+cGNlLWJv dW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmc8L2E+IFs8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86cGNlLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmci Pm1haWx0bzpwY2UtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZzwvYT5dDQo8L3NwYW4+PGI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0i WkgtQ04iIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O01TIEdvdGhp YyZxdW90Oztjb2xvcjp3aW5kb3d0ZXh0Ij7ku6Pooag8L3NwYW4+PC9iPjxiPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9 IlpILUNOIiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTpTaW1TdW47Y29sb3I6 d2luZG93dGV4dCI+DQo8L3NwYW4+PC9iPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O2Zv bnQtZmFtaWx5OlNpbVN1bjtjb2xvcjp3aW5kb3d0ZXh0Ij5SYW1vbiBDYXNlbGxhczxicj4NCjwv c3Bhbj48Yj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJaSC1DTiIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC4wcHQ7Zm9udC1m YW1pbHk6TWluZ0xpVTtjb2xvcjp3aW5kb3d0ZXh0Ij7lj5HpgIHml7bpl7Q8L3NwYW4+PC9iPjxi PjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OlNpbVN1bjtjb2xvcjp3 aW5kb3d0ZXh0Ij46PC9zcGFuPjwvYj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDtmb250 LWZhbWlseTpTaW1TdW47Y29sb3I6d2luZG93dGV4dCI+IDIwMTM8L3NwYW4+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0i WkgtQ04iIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O01TIEdvdGhp YyZxdW90Oztjb2xvcjp3aW5kb3d0ZXh0Ij7lubQ8L3NwYW4+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6 ZToxMC4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6U2ltU3VuO2NvbG9yOndpbmRvd3RleHQiPjc8L3NwYW4+PHNw YW4gbGFuZz0iWkgtQ04iIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90 O01TIEdvdGhpYyZxdW90Oztjb2xvcjp3aW5kb3d0ZXh0Ij7mnIg8L3NwYW4+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9 ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6U2ltU3VuO2NvbG9yOndpbmRvd3RleHQiPjMw PC9zcGFuPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IlpILUNOIiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDtmb250LWZh bWlseTomcXVvdDtNUyBHb3RoaWMmcXVvdDs7Y29sb3I6d2luZG93dGV4dCI+5pelPC9zcGFuPjxz cGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OlNpbVN1bjtjb2xvcjp3aW5k b3d0ZXh0Ij4NCiAxNzozMjxicj4NCjwvc3Bhbj48Yj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJaSC1DTiIgc3R5bGU9 ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7TVMgR290aGljJnF1b3Q7O2NvbG9y OndpbmRvd3RleHQiPuaUtuS7tuS6ujwvc3Bhbj48L2I+PGI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6 ZToxMC4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6U2ltU3VuO2NvbG9yOndpbmRvd3RleHQiPjo8L3NwYW4+PC9i PjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OlNpbVN1bjtjb2xvcjp3 aW5kb3d0ZXh0Ij4NCiBKb25hdGhhbiBIYXJkd2ljazsgPGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOnBjZUBpZXRm Lm9yZyI+cGNlQGlldGYub3JnPC9hPjxicj4NCjwvc3Bhbj48Yj48c3BhbiBsYW5nPSJaSC1DTiIg c3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7TVMgR290aGljJnF1b3Q7 O2NvbG9yOndpbmRvd3RleHQiPuS4uzwvc3Bhbj48L2I+PGI+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz0iWkgtQ04iIHN0 eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5Ok1pbmdMaVU7Y29sb3I6d2luZG93dGV4 dCI+6aKYPC9zcGFuPjwvYj48Yj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDtmb250LWZh bWlseTpTaW1TdW47Y29sb3I6d2luZG93dGV4dCI+Ojwvc3Bhbj48L2I+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZv bnQtc2l6ZToxMC4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6U2ltU3VuO2NvbG9yOndpbmRvd3RleHQiPg0KIFJl OiBbUGNlXSBDb21tZW50cyBvbiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLXBjZS1nbXBscy1wY2VwLWV4dGVuc2lvbnMt MDg8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05v cm1hbCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+ T24gMDcvMzAvMjAxMyAxMTowOCBBTSwgSm9uYXRoYW4gSGFyZHdpY2sgd3JvdGU6PG86cD48L286 cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxibG9ja3F1b3RlIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tdG9wOjUuMHB0O21hcmdp bi1ib3R0b206NS4wcHQiPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9y OiM5NDM2MzQiPkN5cmlsIGFuZCBJIGhhZCBhbiBvZmZsaW5lIGNvbnZlcnNhdGlvbiBhYm91dCB0 aGVzZSBjb21tZW50cy4mbmJzcDsgVGhpcyBlbWFpbCBpcyB0byBkb2N1bWVudCB0aGUgZGlzY3Vz c2lvbiBmb3IgdGhlIGJlbmVmaXQgb2YgdGhlIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdC4mbmJzcDsgU2VlDQo8Yj5b SkVILU1DXTwvYj4gY29tbWVudHMgYmVsb3cuPC9zcGFuPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xh c3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiM5NDM2MzQiPiZuYnNwOzwvc3Bhbj48 bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjoj OTQzNjM0Ij5XZSBoYXZlIG9uZSBxdWVzdGlvbiBmb3IgdGhlIFdHLCBhcyBmb2xsb3dzLiZuYnNw OyBJZiBhbnlvbmUgaGFzIGFuIG9waW5pb24gb24gdGhpcywgcGxlYXNlIGNvdWxkIHlvdSBwcm92 aWRlIGl0IHRvIHRoZSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3Q/PC9zcGFuPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xh c3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiM5NDM2MzQiPiZuYnNwOzwvc3Bhbj48 bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjoj OTQzNjM0Ij4tLS08L3NwYW4+PG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48 Yj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6Izk0MzYzNCI+W0pFSC1NQ108L3NwYW4+PC9iPjxzcGFuIHN0 eWxlPSJjb2xvcjojOTQzNjM0Ij4gSm9uIGJlbGlldmVzIHRoYXQgdGhpcyBkcmFmdCBzaG91bGQg cmVsYXggdGhlIHJlc3RyaWN0aW9uIG9mIFJGQyA1NDQwIHRoYXQgdGhlIEJBTkRXSURUSCBvYmpl Y3QgaXMgbWFuZGF0b3J5LCBpbiB0aGUgY2FzZSB3aGVyZSBhIEdFTkVSQUxJWkVELUJBTkRXSURU SCBpcyBzdXBwbGllZA0KIGluc3RlYWQuJm5ic3A7IFRoaXMgd291bGQgbWVhbiBjaGFuZ2luZyBl eGlzdGluZyBwcm9jZWR1cmVzLCB0aGUgaW5pdGlhbCBtZWNoYW5pc20gd2FzIG5vdCB0byBjaGFu Z2UgUkZDNTQ0MCBvYmplY3QgcHJlc2VuY2UgcnVsZS4gJm5ic3A7Q3lyaWwgaXMgZmluZSB3aXRo IHRoZSBwcm9wb3NhbCBmcm9tIEpvbmF0aGFuLCBidXQgd2Ugd291bGQgbGlrZSB0byBnZXQgV0cg YW5kIGltcGxlbWVudGVycyBmZWVkYmFjay4NCjwvc3Bhbj48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNs YXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTIuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5 OlNpbVN1biI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPC9ibG9ja3F1b3RlPg0KPHAg Y2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCIgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MTIuMHB0Ij48c3BhbiBzdHls ZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEyLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTpTaW1TdW4iPjxicj4NCkpvbiwgQ3lyaWws IGFsbDxicj4NCjxicj4NCkluIHRoaXMgY2FzZSwgSSB3b3VsZCBnbyBiYWNrIHRvIG9uZSBvZiBt eSBpbml0aWFsIHN1Z2dlc3Rpb25zOiBkbyBub3QgYWRkIEdFTkVSQUxJWkVEX0JBTkRXSURUSCBh bmQgYWRkIGEgVExWIHRvIHRoZSBCVyBvYmplY3RzLCB3aGljaCBjYW4gYmUgaWdub3JlZC48YnI+ DQo8YnI+DQpJbiBvdGhlciB3b3JkcywgdGhlIGNyZWF0aW9uIG9mIEdFTl9CVyB3YXMganVzdGlm aWVkIGR1ZSB0bzombmJzcDsgYSkgZG8gbm90IHRvdWNoIHJmYzU0NDAgYikgaWYgUkZDNTQ0MCBk b2VzIG5vdCBzdGF0ZSB0aGF0IEJXIG9iamVjdCBjYW4gaGF2ZSBUTFZzLCB0aGVuIHRoZXkgY2Fu J3QgYW5kIGl0IGlzIGZpeGVkIGxlbmd0aC48YnI+DQo8YnI+DQpNeSBwZXJzb25hbCBwcmVmZXJl bmNlIGFsd2F5cyB3YXMgdG8gYWRkIGEgVExWIG9yIGEgbmV3IG9iamVjdCB0eXBlIGZvciBCVy4m bmJzcDsgSWYgd2UgYWxsb3cgb3Vyc2VsdmVzIGEgbGliZXJhbCBpbnRlcnByZXRhdGlvbiBvZiBy ZmM1NDQwIHRoZW4gbGV0J3MgYXNzdW1lIHdlIGNhbiBhZGQgYSB0bHYuLi48YnI+DQo8YnI+DQpK dXN0IG15IG9waW5pb24sIG9mIGNvdXJzZSwgYW5kIG5vdCBhIHBhcnRpY3VsYXJseSBzdHJvbmcg b25lPGJyPg0KPGJyPg0KUmFtb248bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cHJlPjxzcGFuIHN0 eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NvdXJpZXIgTmV3JnF1b3Q7 Ij4tLSA8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3ByZT4NCjxwcmU+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6 ZToxMC4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q291cmllciBOZXcmcXVvdDsiPlJhbW9uIENhc2Vs bGFzLCBQaC5ELiAtLSBTZW5pb3IgUmVzZWFyY2ggQXNzb2NpYXRlIC0tIE5ldHdvcmtzIERpdmlz aW9uPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wcmU+DQo8cHJlPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6 MTAuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NvdXJpZXIgTmV3JnF1b3Q7Ij5PcHRpY2FsIE5ldHdv cmtzIGFuZCBTeXN0ZW1zIERlcGFydG1lbnQgLS0gPGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL3dpa2lvbmEuY3R0 Yy5lcyI+aHR0cDovL3dpa2lvbmEuY3R0Yy5lczwvYT48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3ByZT4N CjxwcmU+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q291 cmllciBOZXcmcXVvdDsiPkNUVEMgLSBDZW50cmUgVGVjbm9sw7JnaWMgZGUgVGVsZWNvbXVuaWNh Y2lvbnMgZGUgQ2F0YWx1bnlhPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wcmU+DQo8cHJlPjxzcGFuIHN0 eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NvdXJpZXIgTmV3JnF1b3Q7 Ij5QYXJjIE1lZGl0ZXJyYW5pIGRlIGxhIFRlY25vbG9naWEgKFBNVCkgLSBFZGlmaWNpIEI0PG86 cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wcmU+DQo8cHJlPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0 O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NvdXJpZXIgTmV3JnF1b3Q7Ij5Bdi4gQ2FybCBGcmllZHJpY2gg R2F1c3MsIDcgLSAwODg2MCBDYXN0ZWxsZGVmZWxzIChCYXJjZWxvbmEpIC0gU3BhaW48bzpwPjwv bzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3ByZT4NCjxwcmU+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC4wcHQ7Zm9u dC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q291cmllciBOZXcmcXVvdDsiPlRlbC46ICYjNDM7MzQgOTMgNjQ1IDI5 IDAwIGV4dCAyMTY4LS0gRmF4LiAmIzQzOzM0IDkzIDY0NSAyOSAwMSA8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bh bj48L3ByZT4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9ib2R5Pg0KPC9odG1s Pg0K --_000_523C37072C291347B9730C9291CCA07D0D1A38DB3PRD0411MB427eu_-- From ramon.casellas@cttc.es Thu Aug 1 00:26:53 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B437121F9360 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:26:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.485 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.485 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.113, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V3bGYvpnESMk for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:26:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from marchena.puc.rediris.es (marchena.puc.rediris.es [IPv6:2001:720:418:ca00::4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF24721F8A85 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:26:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [84.88.62.208] (helo=leo) by marchena.puc.rediris.es with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V4nHY-0007oV-EQ; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 09:26:44 +0200 Received: from [10.25.11.184] (unknown [46.189.28.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by leo (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 179411FD41; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 09:26:41 +0200 (CEST) X-Envelope-From: ramon.casellas@cttc.es Message-ID: <51FA0DB1.3090507@cttc.es> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 09:26:41 +0200 From: Ramon Casellas Organization: CTTC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" References: <04fc01ce8df4$449e3a40$cddaaec0$@olddog.co.uk> <51F9CD23.4040401@cttc.es> <0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0E158610@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0E158610@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010906020507080005090706" X-Spamina-Bogosity: Ham Cc: "" , "Margaria, Cyril \(Coriant - DE/Munich\)" Subject: Re: [Pce] Bandwidth: Comments on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-08 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 07:26:54 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010906020507080005090706 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/01/2013 09:17 AM, Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti) wrote: > >> Another use case (very particular to mu interests) is when I want to >> ask the PCE to perform routing and spectrum assignment. I want the >> PCE to compute a path of a given spectrum width, to pre-establish it. >> the width is given by the corresponding OTS / slot, and the actual >> client signal mapping is unknown, and will depend on the modulation >> format and FEC. I don't know what bandwdith I would convey in the >> message. > > What exactly inputs you have to your CSFP and what the output you expect? We are still working on that, so take this as a "preliminary" answer :-) Without discarding more complex inputs / outputs, at the bare minimum, assuming all / most paths are pre-qualified, I would expect the following use case: - A NMS (sorry, now I should say SDN controller :P) acting as a PCC sends a request for a network media channel; the request contains the endpoints that identify the nodes/transceivers and somehow conveys (TSPEC?) that I want a pipe - media channel of "100 GHz". The PCE would then perform RSA and return the ERO and, for example, explicit label control in which at each hop I have the outgoing frequency slot. If the PCC requested a given TSPEC, that would be easy to implement with the "m" paramenters. If the PCE has allocated a bigger media channel (for some reason) it should return the allocated "m", which hopefully wll be >= requested m. This is in the spirit of the "separation of concerns" that we are not focussing on the signal mapping Signal > media layer. This does not preclude that we may end up thinking of more complex scenarios where the PCE assigns also the modulation format / number of subcarriers, etc. etc. but this is yet to be seen, and a bit too early I guess. Thanks R. --------------010906020507080005090706 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On 08/01/2013 09:17 AM, Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti) wrote:

Another use case (very particular to mu interests) is when I want to ask the PCE to perform routing and spectrum assignment. I want the PCE to compute a path of a given spectrum width, to pre-establish it. the width is given by the corresponding OTS / slot, and the actual client signal mapping is unknown, and will depend on the modulation format and FEC. I don't know what bandwdith I would convey in the message. 


What exactly inputs you have to your CSFP and what the output you expect?

We are still working on that, so take this as a "preliminary" answer :-) Without discarding more complex inputs / outputs, at the bare minimum, assuming all / most paths are pre-qualified, I would expect the following use case:

- A NMS (sorry, now I should say SDN controller :P) acting as a PCC sends a request for a network media channel; the request contains the endpoints that identify the nodes/transceivers and somehow conveys (TSPEC?) that I want a pipe - media channel of "100 GHz". The PCE would then perform RSA and return the ERO and, for example, explicit label control in which at each hop I have the outgoing frequency slot. If the PCC requested a given TSPEC, that would be easy to implement with the "m" paramenters. If the PCE has allocated a bigger media channel (for some reason) it should return the allocated "m", which hopefully wll be >= requested m. This is in the spirit of the "separation of concerns" that we are not focussing on the signal mapping Signal > media layer.

This does not preclude that we may end up thinking of more complex scenarios where the PCE assigns also the modulation format / number of subcarriers, etc. etc. but this is yet to be seen, and a bit too early I guess.

Thanks
R.

--------------010906020507080005090706-- From ramon.casellas@cttc.es Thu Aug 1 00:33:34 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79CB721F9AC5 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:33:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.523 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.076, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KszKXKy9bWmp for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:33:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from villa.puc.rediris.es (villa.puc.rediris.es [IPv6:2001:720:418:ca00::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E106D21F85B3 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:33:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [84.88.62.208] (helo=leo) by villa.puc.rediris.es with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V4nO7-0001SA-Th for pce@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 09:33:32 +0200 Received: from [10.25.11.184] (unknown [46.189.28.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by leo (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B40931FD41 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 09:33:28 +0200 (CEST) X-Envelope-From: ramon.casellas@cttc.es Message-ID: <51FA0F49.9050306@cttc.es> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 09:33:29 +0200 From: Ramon Casellas Organization: CTTC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "pce@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamina-Bogosity: Ham Subject: [Pce] Clarification/Comment on draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext-01.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 07:33:34 -0000 All, Following Young presentation, a question was raised regarding the WA object, and the Wavelength restriction TLV, and how it related to the use of XRO and IRO objects. We believe that the use of the WA object and one (or more) TLVs provides the flexibility to include and exclude wavelengths on a per link (set) basis. We acknowledge that this is quite WSON specific, given the global significance of labels in transparent segments. When trying to see whether the use of XRO/IRO would be enough, we came up with a few restrictions: - Right now, there is no way to convey a labelset. We have LABEL sub-object for ?RO objects, but no LABEL_SET, sub-object although this could change in the future. A LABEL_SET would sub-object nonetheless be restricted by size. - Without a LABEL_SET subobject, if we want to restrict to a set of labels, we are forced to list all of them in the XRO/IRO. The encoding is less efficient and we could reach the 8-bit ?RO subobject limit. - There is no way in XRO to state I want to exclude these labels at a given link. Comments are most welcome. Thanks and best regards Ramon From giomarti@cisco.com Thu Aug 1 00:44:35 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8AC21F9DA5 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:44:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RwGk3+lUfRXy for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:44:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F1521F9D7B for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:44:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1797; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1375343052; x=1376552652; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=M42gzOlzFu4mpifTBLmdwOhfz7cFkwuTjjaXo/25dwY=; b=Njq9CGU7SDTKvVohxu9yDBG71PjSlUftJ78oxFQ6USgPWlC2qe3K3VlL MLXn277hnirTH6O6+LnpglUIB8XVPNq5Orrdkvn9Oj+qKoHUJru1Y1dKX GSrko5mG4eMUPmXlMAAlriw5s5PsSMpmN5reFgf1cuMC0nvo4cVdNvPRd 8=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgMFAKUQ+lGtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABbgwY1UL5MgR4WdIIkAQEBAwEBAQE3NAsFCwIBCCIUECcLJQIEDgUIiAIGDLkpBI5KgQoCMQeDGHMDqSyDFIFpQQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,792,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="242126607" Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Aug 2013 07:44:11 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com [173.36.12.82]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r717iB7S030006 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:44:11 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.213]) by xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com ([173.36.12.82]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 02:44:11 -0500 From: "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" To: Ramon Casellas Thread-Topic: [Pce] Clarification/Comment on draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext-01.txt Thread-Index: AQHOjolxQDnCn1kd30uROPEXv27AspmATI6A Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:44:10 +0000 Message-ID: <0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0E158930@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> References: <51FA0F49.9050306@cttc.es> In-Reply-To: <51FA0F49.9050306@cttc.es> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.61.94.7] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <51399BF3B57E19429C3CEE5B4E527F0A@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "pce@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pce] Clarification/Comment on draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext-01.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 07:44:35 -0000 Hi, On Aug 1, 2013, at 9:33 , Ramon Casellas wrote: > All, >=20 > Following Young presentation, a question was raised regarding the WA obj= ect, and the Wavelength restriction TLV, and how it related to the use of X= RO and IRO objects. >=20 > We believe that the use of the WA object and one (or more) TLVs provides = the flexibility to include and exclude wavelengths on a per link (set) basi= s. We acknowledge that this is quite WSON specific, given the global signif= icance of labels in transparent segments. "local significance but global semantic" this was a sentence from a gmpls g= uru a while ago ... (but ,since I'm getting older, my memory MTBF increase)= ;) Anyway, first clarification question, you mention transparent segment and a= t the same time you need such fine wavelength assignement... am I missing s= omething? Cheers G > When trying to see whether the use of XRO/IRO would be enough, we came up= with a few restrictions: >=20 > - Right now, there is no way to convey a labelset. We have LABEL sub-obje= ct for ?RO objects, but no LABEL_SET, sub-object although this could change= in the future. A LABEL_SET would sub-object nonetheless be restricted by s= ize. >=20 > - Without a LABEL_SET subobject, if we want to restrict to a set of label= s, we are forced to list all of them in the XRO/IRO. The encoding is less e= fficient and we could reach the 8-bit ?RO subobject limit. >=20 > - There is no way in XRO to state I want to exclude these labels at a giv= en link. >=20 > Comments are most welcome. >=20 > Thanks and best regards > Ramon >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From ramon.casellas@cttc.es Thu Aug 1 00:57:29 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D2921F9E54 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:57:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.542 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.542 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.057, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Un9Xggh1cc6m for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:57:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from marchena.puc.rediris.es (marchena.puc.rediris.es [IPv6:2001:720:418:ca00::4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 093BA21F9E44 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:57:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [84.88.62.208] (helo=leo) by marchena.puc.rediris.es with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V4nl6-0003kM-6S; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 09:57:16 +0200 Received: from [10.25.11.184] (unknown [46.189.28.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by leo (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E37D01FD41; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 09:57:12 +0200 (CEST) X-Envelope-From: ramon.casellas@cttc.es Message-ID: <51FA14DA.4020103@cttc.es> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 09:57:14 +0200 From: Ramon Casellas Organization: CTTC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" References: <51FA0F49.9050306@cttc.es> <0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0E158930@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0E158930@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamina-Bogosity: Ham Cc: "pce@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pce] Clarification/Comment on draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext-01.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 07:57:29 -0000 On 08/01/2013 09:44 AM, Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti) wrote: > > "local significance but global semantic" this was a sentence from a gmpls guru a while ago ... (but ,since I'm getting older, my memory MTBF increase) ;) > > Anyway, first clarification question, you mention transparent segment and at the same time you need such fine wavelength assignement... am I missing something? Giovanni, all Good point, I was quite happy to have end-to-end labels constraints in the "LSC LSP", but IIRC (I am also getting old) this was added to address the fact that, in WSON (unlike pure OCh switching, one could guess..), you can have 3R allowing for label swapping and thus that the LSC LSP has several transparent segments so the WA should allow restricting wavelengths on a per segment basis (e.g. to reflect transceiver limitations?). Of course, this does not mean that you can just skip the link set object and just add the end-to-end restriction That said, if it seems that the requirement is unneeded we could think about it. This still does not solve the problem of efficient encoding, imho. If you are still around Young and myself would be happy to talk about it. R. From zhang.xian@huawei.com Thu Aug 1 01:11:18 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16EF121F9E54 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 01:11:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.447 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.051, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bXD+b1GrS9AU for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 01:11:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 929A721F9E13 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 01:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AVQ03244; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 08:10:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 09:10:02 +0100 Received: from SZXEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.95) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 09:10:14 +0100 Received: from SZXEML510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.4]) by szxeml408-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.95]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:10:04 +0800 From: "Zhangxian (Xian)" To: "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" Thread-Topic: comment on draft-zhx-pce-stateful-lsp-sync-00 Thread-Index: AQHOjhZtsN4LXaxlykWXRM5qQ9+0SJl/RrYGgABr+QCAADq4ig== Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 08:10:03 +0000 Message-ID: References: <0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0E156B22@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> , <0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0E1571DD@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0E1571DD@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.200.217.201] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Cc: "pce@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pce] comment on draft-zhx-pce-stateful-lsp-sync-00 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 08:11:18 -0000 SGksIA0KDQogICBQbGVhc2Ugc2VlIGlubGluZTogDQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQq3orz+yMs6IEdpb3Zhbm5pIE1hcnRpbmVsbGkgKGdpb21hcnRpKSBb Z2lvbWFydGlAY2lzY28uY29tXQ0Kt6LLzcqxvOQ6IDIwMTPE6jjUwjHI1SA2OjMwDQq1vTogWmhh bmd4aWFuIChYaWFuKQ0KQ2M6IHBjZUBpZXRmLm9yZw0K1vfM4jogUmU6IGNvbW1lbnQgb24gZHJh ZnQtemh4LXBjZS1zdGF0ZWZ1bC1sc3Atc3luYy0wMA0KDQpIaSBYaWFuLA0KDQpPbiBKdWwgMzEs IDIwMTMsIGF0IDIzOjE0ICwgIlpoYW5neGlhbiAoWGlhbikiIDx6aGFuZy54aWFuQGh1YXdlaS5j b20+DQogd3JvdGU6DQoNCj4gSGksDQo+DQo+ICAgVGhhbmsgeW91IGZvciBxdWVzdGlvbnMuDQo+ DQo+ICBJIGRvIG5vdCB1bmRlcnN0YW5kIHlvdXIgc3RhdGVtZW50ICJpZiB0aGUgUENDIHN0YXRl IGlzIHNvIGJpZyB0aGF0IGNvdWxkIG5vdCBiZSB0cmFuc2ZlcnJlZCBpbiBvbmUgc2hvdCAobm90 IG5lY2Vzc2FyaWx5IG9uZSBwYWNrZXQgb3Igb25lIGRhdGFncmFtKS4gIiBXaGVuIHdlIGFyZSB0 YWxraW5nIGhlcmUgaXMgdG8gc3luY2hyb25pemUgdGhlIExTUC1EQiwgd2hpY2ggY29uc2lzdHMg b2YgTFNQcyBvZiBtYW5hZ2VhYmxlIG1lc3NhZ2Ugc2l6ZS4gQWN0dWFsbHksIGl0IGlzIHBvc3Np YmxlIHRvIGNvbWJpbmUgbXVsdGlwbGUgTFNQIHN0YXRlcyB0b2dldGhlci4NCj4NCg0KR00+IElu ICBzZWN0aW9uIDEuMSAiTW90aXZhdGlvbiIgeW91IHByb3ZpZGUgc29tZSBudW1iZXJzLiBDb3Vs ZCB5b3UgZXN0aW1hdGUgdGhlIHRoZSBMU1AtREIgc2l6ZSAmIGJhbmR3aWR0aCBhdmFpbGFibGU/ IERvIHlvdSBhZ3JlZSB0aGF0IG9wdGltaXNhdGlvbiBzdWdnZXN0ZWQgaGVyZSBoYXMgc29tZSBj b3N0cz8NClhpYW4+ICAgDQoiVGhlIGJpYmxlIiBwcm92aWRlcyBhIG1lY2hhbmlzbSBmb3IgZnVs bCBzeW5jcmluaXphdGlvbiB3aXRoIExTUC1EQiAoc2F5ICB3aXRoIHRoZSBzaXplIG9mIFgpLCBv dXIgcHJvcG9zYWwgaXMgdG8gYWxsb3cgaW5jcmVtZW50YWwgc3luY3Jvbml6YXRpb24gaW4gd2hp Y2ggY2FzZSB5b3UgdHJhbnNmZXIgcGFydGlhbCBEQiAobGV0J3MgYXNzdW1lIFkpLiBOb3RlIHRo YXQgWSBpcyBhbHdheXMgc21hbGxlciB0aGFuIFguIFNvIElNTyB0aGVyZSBpcyBubyBleHRyYSBj b3N0IHdpdGggcmVzcGVjdCB0byBEQiBzaXplIG9yIGJhbmR3aWR0aCBhdmFpbGFpYmxlLiBJbmNy ZW1lbnRhbCBzeW5jLiBjYW4gYWN0dWFsbHkgaGVscCB0aGUgUENFIHRvIGNvbWUgaW50byBmdWxs IGZ1bmN0aW9uIHF1aWNrZXIuIEhhdmluZyBzYWlkIHRoYXQsIHdlIGFyZSBub3QgdHJ5aW5nIHRv IGdldCByaWQgb2YgZnVsbCBzeW5jLiwgYnV0IHJhdGhlciB0byBhY2NvbW1vZGF0ZSB0aGUgc2Nl bmFyaW8gd2hlcmUgdGhlcmUgaXMgc3VjaCBuZWVkIChpLmUuLCB0aGUgc2NlbmFyaW8gcHJvdmlk ZWQgaW4gbW90aXZhdGlvbikuICAgDQoNCj4gU2Vjb25kbHksIGZvciB3aGF0IHlvdSBtZW50aW9u ZWQgImZpcnN0IHJlcXVlc3QgZmFpbHMiLCB3aGF0IGRvIHlvdSBtZWFuIGJ5IHRoYXQ/IFNpbmNl IFBDRVAgaXMgYmFzZWQgb24gVENQLCBzbyB0aGVyZSBzaG91bGQgYmUgbWVjaGFuaXNtcyB0byBz dXBwb3J0IHJlbGlhYmxlIGRlbGl2ZXJ5IChvdXRzaWRlIG9mIFBDRVApLiBTbywgTk8gTUFUVEVS IGlmIGl0IGlzIGZ1bGwgc3luYy4gb3IgcGFydGlhbCBzeW5jLiwgdGhlIERCIHdpbGwgYmUgaW5j b21wbGV0ZSBhbnl3YXkgZXZlbiBpZiB5b3VyIGFzc3VtcHRpb24gaG9sZHMuIFNvIGl0IGRvZXMg bm90IGludmFsaWRhdGUgb3VyIHByb3Bvc2FsLg0KDQpHTT4gSSBndWVzcyBJIG1lYW50IGEgc3Rh dGUgc3luY3Jvbml6YXRpb24gb3BlcmF0aW9uIChvciBzZXF1ZW5jZSApIGFzIHBlciBzZWN0aW9u IDUuNCAiU3RhdGUgU3luY2hyb25pc2F0aW9uIiAgb2YgdGhlIGJpYmxlLiAgSW4gZ2VuZXJhbCBv cGVyYXRpb25zIG1heSBmYWlscyBmb3IgZGlmZmVyZW50IHJlYXNvbnMgLi4uIGFueXdheSBUQ1Ag c2hvdWxkIGhlbHAgeW91IGluIGF2b2lkaW5nIGZ1cnRoZXIgbWVjaGFuaXNtLg0KWGlhbj4gT2su IA0KDQo+DQo+DQo+IEFzIGZvciB0aGUgbGFzdCBjb21tZW50LCBpZiB5b3UgcmVhZCAob3IgbWF5 IGJlIGludGVyZXN0ZWQgdG8pIHRoZSBXRyBkcmFmdCBjYXJlZnVsbHksIHRoZSBmdW5jdGlvbiB5 b3UgbWVudGlvbmVkIGJlbG93IGFzICJBIFBDQyBTSE9VTEQgcmVtZW1iZXIgdGhlIGRlbGV0ZWQg TFNQIGFzIHdlbGwiIGlzIGFscmVhZHkgc3VwcG9ydGVkIHRoZXJlLiBTbywgSSBkbyBub3Qgc2Vl IGhvdyBpdCBpcyBhbiBpc3N1ZSBhdCBhbGwuDQoNCkdNPiAgY291bGQgeW91IHByb3ZpZGUgYSBw b2ludGVyIHdoZXJlIGlzIGFscmVhZHkgc3VwcG9ydGVkPw0KDQpYaWFuPiBMZXQgbWUgc3RhcnQg YWdhaW4uIEFzIHN0YXRlZCBpbiBXRyBkcmFmdCAiVGhpcyBpcyBhY2NvbXBsaXNoZWQgYnkga2Vl cGluZyB0cmFjaw0KICAgb2YgdGhlIGNoYW5nZXMgdG8gdGhlIExTUCBTdGF0ZSBEYXRhYmFzZSwg dXNpbmcgYSBkYXRhYmFzZSB2ZXJzaW9uDQogICBjYWxsZWQgdGhlIExTUCBTdGF0ZSBEYXRhYmFz ZSBWZXJzaW9uLiIgIGFuZCBzdXBwb3J0IG9mIFIgYml0IGluIExTUCBvYmplY3QgaW4gU2VjdGlv biA3LjMsIHNlbmRpbmcgdGhlIHJlbW92ZSBzdGF0ZSB2aWEgUENScHQgdG8gc3RhdGVmdWwgUENF IGZvciBkZWxldGVkIExTUCBpcyBhbHJlYWR5IGEgcGFydCBvZiBXRyBkb2N1bWVudC4gSW4gdGhp cyBkb2N1bWVudCB0aGlzIHN0YXRlIG5lZWRzIHRvIGJlIHJlbWVtYmVyZWQgZm9yIGEgbGl0dGxl IHdoaWxlIGxvbmdlciB0byBmYWNpbGl0YXRlIGluY3JlbWVudGFsIExTUCBzeXNuYy4gTm90ZSB0 aGF0IHRoaXMgaXMgbm90IHRvbyBtdWNoIG9mIGFuIG92ZXJoZWFkIGFzIHRoaXMgbmVlZHMgdG8g YmUgcmVtZW1iZXJlZCBvbmx5IGlmIHRoZXJlIGlzIGEgUENFUCBzZXNzaW9uIGRvd24gd2l0aCB3 aGljaCB0aGUgUENDIGNhbiBkbyBpbmNyZW1lbnRhbCB1cGRhdGUuIA0KDQoNCkJSLA0KWGlhbg0K DQpDaGVlcnMNCkcNCg0KDQo+DQo+IFJlZ2FyZHMsDQo+IFhpYW4NCj4NCj4gX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KPiC3orz+yMs6IHBjZS1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYu b3JnIFtwY2UtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gtPqx7SBHaW92YW5uaSBNYXJ0aW5lbGxpIChnaW9t YXJ0aSkgW2dpb21hcnRpQGNpc2NvLmNvbV0NCj4gt6LLzcqxvOQ6IDIwMTPE6jjUwjHI1SAxOjUw DQo+ILW9OiBwY2VAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4g1vfM4jogW1BjZV0gY29tbWVudCBvbiBkcmFmdC16aHgt cGNlLXN0YXRlZnVsLWxzcC1zeW5jLTAwDQo+DQo+IERlYXIgQXV0aG9ycywNCj4NCj4gaGVyZSBh biBlbmdpbmVlciAobm90IG5lY2Vzc2FyaWx5IGEgbmV0d29yayBlbmdpbmVlcikgY29tbWVudC4g SXQgY29tZXMgdG8gbXkgbWluZCBkdXJpbmcgdG9kYXkgcHJlc2VudGF0aW9uIHNvIC4uLiAgdG9z c2luZyB0byB0aGUgbGlzdCBob3BlIGhlbHAgZGlzY3Vzc2lvbi4NCj4NCj4gTG9va3MgdG8gbWUg eW91IGFyZSBhZGRpbmcgYW4gb3B0aW1pc2F0aW9uIHRoYXQgYWN0dWFsbHkgbWF5IGFkZCBtb3Jl IHByb2JsZW1zIHRoYW4gdGhlIG9uZSB5b3UgYXJlIHRyeWluZyB0byBzb2x2ZS4NCj4NCj4gSSBm aXJzdCB3b25kZXIgaWYgdGhlIFBDQyBzdGF0ZSBpcyBzbyBiaWcgdGhhdCBjb3VsZCBub3QgYmUg dHJhbnNmZXJyZWQgaW4gb25lIHNob3QgKG5vdCBuZWNlc3NhcmlseSBvbmUgcGFja2V0IG9yIG9u ZSBkYXRhZ3JhbSkuICBJbiBjYXNlIGZpcnN0IHJlcXVlc3QgZmFpbHMgd291bmQndCBiZSBiZXR0 ZXIganVzdCByZXRyeSBpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIGFkZGluZyB0aGUgY29tcGxleGl0eSBvZiBpbmNyZW1l bnRhbCB1cGRhdGVzPw0KPg0KPiBTZWNvbmQsIHlvdSBoYXZlIHRvIHBheSB0aGUgcHJpY2Ugb2Yg cGFydGlhbGx5IHN5bmNocm9uaXNlZCBEQi4gV2hhdCB5b3UgY2FuIGRvIHdpdGggYSBwYXJ0aWFs IHN0YXRlPyBNeSBmaXJzdCBmZWVsaW5nIHlvdSBoYXZlIHRvIGp1c3QgY29uc2lkZXIgeW91ciAg REIgYXMgbm90IHN5bmNocm9uaXNlZC4NCj4NCj4gVGhpcmQsIFlvdSBhbHNvIGltcGx5IHRoZXJl J3MgbW9yZSBzdGF0ZSB0byBtYWludGFpbiBhdCB0aGUgUENDIHNpZGUgYXMgd2VsbC4uLiAgZS5n LiAiQSBQQ0MgU0hPVUxEIHJlbWVtYmVyIHRoZSBkZWxldGVkIExTUCBhcyB3ZWxsIiAuDQo+DQo+ IENoZWVycw0KPiBHDQo+DQo+DQo+DQo+DQo+IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQo+IFBjZSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCj4gUGNlQGlldGYub3JnDQo+ IGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vcGNl From giomarti@cisco.com Thu Aug 1 01:29:33 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773BF21F9DF1 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 01:29:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -8.672 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.672 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.174, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TKMRShdvrrZS for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 01:29:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D8F21F944C for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 01:29:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=950; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1375345748; x=1376555348; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=112ARMQS0ZXwbKYDSZC1DuxKckouA2YvBiqRHQblui0=; b=jssNnx+25VD81Baqufl822zEICYgO4Y7ymcM0t0YK1TGHpUnjLYocxsA WRRhMcEWn4H73ClZsE82QXcS159dA9tNWhr8TqrbSK3O7vomZZwq3h7CJ Tb9InmDxVvJ/PSFYdMxZDSLlRr9fs7N08mLCw+fAGVRpT20b0uXj9mAoz o=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Am8FACwb+lGtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABbgwaBBYJJR7tPF4EHFnSCJAEBAQMBNEUFCwIBCBwGIgICMCUCBA4FCIgCBowUm0AIkU+BJI4wAjEHgmE3cwOpLIMUgio X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,792,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="242116215" Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Aug 2013 08:28:58 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com [173.37.183.75]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r718Sw83000576 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 1 Aug 2013 08:28:58 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.213]) by xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([173.37.183.75]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 03:28:58 -0500 From: "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" To: "Zhangxian (Xian)" Thread-Topic: comment on draft-zhx-pce-stateful-lsp-sync-00 Thread-Index: AQHOjhZtsN4LXaxlykWXRM5qQ9+0SJl/RrYGgABr+QCAADq4ioAAbJKA Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 08:28:58 +0000 Message-ID: <0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0E158E03@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> References: <0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0E156B22@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> , <0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0E1571DD@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.61.94.7] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "pce@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pce] comment on draft-zhx-pce-stateful-lsp-sync-00 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 08:29:33 -0000 SGkgWGlhbiwNCg0KZm9yIHRoZSByZXN0IC4uLiB3ZWxsLCBhbnl0aGluZyBtb3JlIHRvIGFkZCBm cm9tIG15IHNpZGUNCg0KT24gQXVnIDEsIDIwMTMsIGF0IDEwOjEwICwgIlpoYW5neGlhbiAoWGlh bikiIDx6aGFuZy54aWFuQGh1YXdlaS5jb20+DQogd3JvdGU6DQoNCj4gU2VjdGlvbiA3LjMsIHNl bmRpbmcgdGhlIHJlbW92ZSBzdGF0ZSB2aWEgUENScHQgdG8gc3RhdGVmdWwgUENFIGZvciBkZWxl dGVkIExTUCBpcyBhbHJlYWR5IGEgcGFydCBvZiBXRyBkb2N1bWVudC4gSW4gdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVu dCB0aGlzIHN0YXRlIG5lZWRzIHRvIGJlIHJlbWVtYmVyZWQgZm9yIGEgbGl0dGxlIHdoaWxlIGxv bmdlciB0byBmYWNpbGl0YXRlIGluY3JlbWVudGFsIExTUCBzeXNuYy4gTm90ZSB0aGF0IHRoaXMg aXMgbm90IHRvbyBtdWNoIG9mIGFuIG92ZXJoZWFkIGFzIHRoaXMgbmVlZHMgdG8gYmUgcmVtZW1i ZXJlZCBvbmx5IGlmIHRoZXJlIGlzIGEgUENFUCBzZXNzaW9uIGRvd24gd2l0aCB3aGljaCB0aGUg UENDIGNhbiBkbyBpbmNyZW1lbnRhbCB1cGRhdGUuIA0KDQpKdXN0IGEgbGl0dGxlIG5vdGUgaGVy ZSB3aGF0IEkgbWVhbiBpcyB0aGF0ICJzZW5kaW5nIiBpcyB2ZXJ5IGRpZmZlcmVudCBmcm9tICJy ZW1lbWJlcmluZyIgYW5kIGhhdmUgZmFpcmx5IGRpZmZlcmVudCBpbXBsaWNhdGlvbi4uLg0KDQpD aGVlcnMNCkc= From julien.meuric@orange.com Thu Aug 1 02:29:14 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7735621F8F24 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 02:29:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id icqXiJNHV8Tt for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 02:29:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p-mail2.rd.orange.com (p-mail2.rd.orange.com [195.101.245.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF21821F9D3E for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 02:28:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p-mail2.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 6271E1074005 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:29:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.46]) by p-mail2.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A6E31074004 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:29:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.44]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:28:11 +0200 Received: from [10.193.116.62] ([10.193.116.62]) by ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:28:13 +0200 Message-ID: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:28:10 +0200 From: Julien Meuric Organization: Orange User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "pce@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Aug 2013 09:28:13.0532 (UTC) FILETIME=[721321C0:01CE8E99] Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 09:29:14 -0000 Hi all. Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 as a foundation for a WG document? Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for the latter, comments would be useful). Regards, JP & Julien From julien.meuric@orange.com Thu Aug 1 02:32:35 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD99C21F99BF for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 02:32:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18aHvqqjGD2l for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 02:32:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p-mail1.rd.orange.com (p-mail1.rd.orange.com [195.101.245.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C98621F9D22 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 02:31:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p-mail1.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 31CCE7E4001 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:30:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.47]) by p-mail1.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5DF7D4001 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:30:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.44]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:30:43 +0200 Received: from [10.193.116.62] ([10.193.116.62]) by ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:30:43 +0200 Message-ID: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:30:41 +0200 From: Julien Meuric Organization: Orange User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "pce@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Aug 2013 09:30:43.0770 (UTC) FILETIME=[CB9FA1A0:01CE8E99] Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 09:32:35 -0000 Hi again. Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 as a foundation for a WG document? Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for the latter, comments would be useful). Regards, JP & Julien From dhruv.ietf@gmail.com Thu Aug 1 02:32:49 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0805321F98AC for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 02:32:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.933 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.933 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, SARE_HTML_USL_OBFU=1.666] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A-qEh9ApmP7g for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 02:32:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-oa0-x22b.google.com (mail-oa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15EE321F8F24 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 02:32:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id i10so3862337oag.30 for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 02:31:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:x-google-sender-delegation:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=umoOJZx3ZcKpnBJPInRexOCaHAAM2U7i1fPAgAksZgg=; b=YjLaktCGtFe5AnK3713rVFxZ2JyEtf5ib0xctHUqKdJaJAPTeap9eBilVDiNDRmsbg wP1DhZblL+LXZXDKnK03xYKR/j/S1ksvLJEZRLfU4a1iYD6xzlpNtMHBkptGnuaEDLeT eAhe7VvkOfXSS/UryVZAyvK8/rowDhaB83zcnpR6DE6bC7skyQOlfgRIJXUieTg3ek9Q JYKgFt9YB/x4n2VKcvNo6Oospy+hgkwEesyR1vZrRTeLRMn7Vy1yNJZYlrHtWMOcboHj wSrIUZSe2AVHYe6TE16eMoJMqC33G9S46D9AHxHYkz/wXr0KfycsaA+myj1I/MihQnF0 Fm+w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.11.46 with SMTP id n14mr1151334igb.15.1375349512357; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 02:31:52 -0700 (PDT) Sender: dhruvdhody@gmail.com X-Google-Sender-Delegation: dhruvdhody@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.152.176 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 02:31:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> References: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:31:52 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0LjR6uFdQDnr1-jJltcTcrdwFSY Message-ID: From: Dhruv Dhody To: Julien Meuric Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc194e2052ac04e2df83d7 Cc: "pce@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 09:32:49 -0000 --047d7bdc194e2052ac04e2df83d7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Support! Dhruv On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Julien Meuric wrote: > Hi all. > > Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to > get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support > draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-**app-04 as a foundation for a WG document? > > Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for the > latter, comments would be useful). > > Regards, > > JP & Julien > > ______________________________**_________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/pce > --047d7bdc194e2052ac04e2df83d7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Support!=A0

Dhruv


On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at = 11:28 AM, Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com> wr= ote:
Hi all.

Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to g= et the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-zhang-pce-statefu= l-pce-app-04 as a foundation for a WG document?

Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for the = latter, comments would be useful).

Regards,

JP & Julien

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
htt= ps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

--047d7bdc194e2052ac04e2df83d7-- From dhruv.ietf@gmail.com Thu Aug 1 02:46:49 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C6221F99E1 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 02:46:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.933 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.933 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, SARE_HTML_USL_OBFU=1.666] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q8dVeB4hZIKM for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 02:46:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-oa0-x236.google.com (mail-oa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BFD821F9946 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 02:46:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id o6so3819330oag.41 for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 02:46:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:x-google-sender-delegation:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=47XooVPPbsqJhE7evoey2pq2hvb9FOG3WYfapyuOdCo=; b=0fYBtS/f+5zFLFsDymITSLhiOraQkVGJbbGKXN+xaEoVgFfP1dcQvZpIW1u0Sr8Cdq WyN/cElPhzMOR+xzsCsD2lSDdxmiJnU2DPBs5M782fkF74j1/Aacux/0RR1A7subK3KT bHHgb5LYJHTufXuzJZZU4Yof8zDwBVLWTx+nx46uk0pJ0mT4JUU5dYAueSy++tc0dSLx joBegW/fxuvMoPljE9+EMBsd+DEwMY+4DiFfKiioHFMak6WORdfzY8HZ4L1dcWY6zIhX GgjD5ZoMk9S8ktJB0FaETKYlAKpd7CjLO267RqeAN9mDlOj4947E6AQG2BsnBpOiBYd6 ql9w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.66.210 with SMTP id h18mr1162941igt.19.1375350407477; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 02:46:47 -0700 (PDT) Sender: dhruvdhody@gmail.com X-Google-Sender-Delegation: dhruvdhody@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.152.176 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 02:46:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> References: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:46:47 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5Z_xRfPO-1ujP3v3MAcPIMx__So Message-ID: From: Dhruv Dhody To: Julien Meuric Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdca4687ac27304e2dfb8e1 Cc: "pce@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 09:46:49 -0000 --047d7bdca4687ac27304e2dfb8e1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Support! Dhruv On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Julien Meuric wrote: > Hi again. > > Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to > get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support > draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-**extensions-04 as a foundation for a WG > document? > > Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for the > latter, comments would be useful). > > Regards, > > JP & Julien > > ______________________________**_________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/pce > --047d7bdca4687ac27304e2dfb8e1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Support!=A0

Dhruv


On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at = 11:30 AM, Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com> wr= ote:
Hi again.

Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to g= et the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-zhang-pce-hierarc= hy-extensions-04 as a foundation for a WG document?

Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for the = latter, comments would be useful).

Regards,

JP & Julien

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
htt= ps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

--047d7bdca4687ac27304e2dfb8e1-- From zhangfatai@huawei.com Thu Aug 1 03:03:17 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41DB21F9EF2 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 03:03:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.587 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.587 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.201, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kRdSJCSTlwv1 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 03:03:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCCC21F9EC6 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 03:03:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AVQ15805; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 10:03:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:02:49 +0100 Received: from szxeml459-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.202) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:03:02 +0100 Received: from SZXEML552-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.72]) by szxeml459-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.202]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 18:02:59 +0800 From: Fatai Zhang To: Julien Meuric , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Thread-Index: AQHOjpoLW/mJjax8xEOnJ5TF3YMzRZmAH0FA Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 10:02:57 +0000 Message-ID: References: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.47.158.95] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: [Pce] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogIFBvbGwgZm9yIEFkb3B0aW9uIG9mIGRyYWZ0LXpo?= =?gb2312?b?YW5nLXBjZS1zdGF0ZWZ1bC1wY2UtYXBwLTA0?= X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 10:03:18 -0000 U3VwcG9ydC4NCg0KRmF0YWkNCg0KDQoNCi0tLS0t08q8/tStvP4tLS0tLQ0Kt6K8/sjLOiBwY2Ut Ym91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZyBbbWFpbHRvOnBjZS1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXSC0+rHtIEp1bGll biBNZXVyaWMNCreiy83KsbzkOiAyMDEzxOo41MIxyNUgMTc6MjgNCsrVvP7IyzogcGNlQGlldGYu b3JnDQrW98ziOiBbUGNlXSBQb2xsIGZvciBBZG9wdGlvbiBvZiBkcmFmdC16aGFuZy1wY2Utc3Rh dGVmdWwtcGNlLWFwcC0wNA0KDQpIaSBhbGwuDQoNCkZvbGxvd2luZyB0aGUgcG9sbCBpbiB0aGUg cm9vbSBkdXJpbmcgeWVzdGVyZGF5IG1lZXRpbmcsIHdlIHdvdWxkIGxpa2UgdG8gZ2V0IHRoZSBm ZWVkYmFjayBvZiB0aGUgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0OiBkbyB5b3Ugc3VwcG9ydA0KZHJhZnQtemhhbmct cGNlLXN0YXRlZnVsLXBjZS1hcHAtMDQgYXMgYSBmb3VuZGF0aW9uIGZvciBhIFdHIGRvY3VtZW50 Pw0KDQpQbGVhc2UgZXhwcmVzcyB5b3VyIHN1cHBvcnQgb3Igb3Bwb3NpdGlvbiBvbiB0aGUgUENF IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdCAoZm9yIHRoZSBsYXR0ZXIsIGNvbW1lbnRzIHdvdWxkIGJlIHVzZWZ1bCku DQoNClJlZ2FyZHMsDQoNCkpQICYgSnVsaWVuDQoNCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQpQY2UgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQpQY2VAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCmh0 dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vcGNlDQo= From zhangfatai@huawei.com Thu Aug 1 03:04:26 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856BB21F9E6A for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 03:04:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.827 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.827 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.961, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cR5fU-eAeAkv for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 03:04:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E0121F9E1D for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 03:04:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AVQ15894; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 10:04:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:03:24 +0100 Received: from SZXEML424-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.163) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:03:36 +0100 Received: from SZXEML552-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.72]) by szxeml424-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.163]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 18:03:34 +0800 From: Fatai Zhang To: Julien Meuric , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 Thread-Index: AQHOjppHekQPJa3X/kC5hN1XQWANuZmAH2HA Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 10:03:33 +0000 Message-ID: References: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.47.158.95] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: [Pce] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogIFBvbGwgZm9yIEFkb3B0aW9uIG9mIGRyYWZ0LXpo?= =?gb2312?b?YW5nLXBjZS1oaWVyYXJjaHktZXh0ZW5zaW9ucy0wNA==?= X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 10:04:26 -0000 U3VwcG9ydCBhcyBjby1hdXRob3IuDQoNCkZhdGFpDQoNCg0KDQotLS0tLdPKvP7Urbz+LS0tLS0N CreivP7IyzogcGNlLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmcgW21haWx0bzpwY2UtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9y Z10gtPqx7SBKdWxpZW4gTWV1cmljDQq3osvNyrG85DogMjAxM8TqONTCMcjVIDE3OjMxDQrK1bz+ yMs6IHBjZUBpZXRmLm9yZw0K1vfM4jogW1BjZV0gUG9sbCBmb3IgQWRvcHRpb24gb2YgZHJhZnQt emhhbmctcGNlLWhpZXJhcmNoeS1leHRlbnNpb25zLTA0DQoNCkhpIGFnYWluLg0KDQpGb2xsb3dp bmcgdGhlIHBvbGwgaW4gdGhlIHJvb20gZHVyaW5nIHllc3RlcmRheSBtZWV0aW5nLCB3ZSB3b3Vs ZCBsaWtlIHRvIGdldCB0aGUgZmVlZGJhY2sgb2YgdGhlIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdDogZG8geW91IHN1 cHBvcnQNCmRyYWZ0LXpoYW5nLXBjZS1oaWVyYXJjaHktZXh0ZW5zaW9ucy0wNCBhcyBhIGZvdW5k YXRpb24gZm9yIGEgV0cgZG9jdW1lbnQ/DQoNClBsZWFzZSBleHByZXNzIHlvdXIgc3VwcG9ydCBv ciBvcHBvc2l0aW9uIG9uIHRoZSBQQ0UgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0IChmb3IgdGhlIGxhdHRlciwgY29t bWVudHMgd291bGQgYmUgdXNlZnVsKS4NCg0KUmVnYXJkcywNCg0KSlAgJiBKdWxpZW4NCg0KX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NClBjZSBtYWlsaW5n IGxpc3QNClBjZUBpZXRmLm9yZw0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5m by9wY2UNCg== From jmedved@cisco.com Thu Aug 1 03:26:43 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4C521F9AA3 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 03:26:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7JtS29zf+OZc for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 03:26:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCC321F9A57 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 03:23:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=680; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1375352636; x=1376562236; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=LSOJCLgKyS9y3lSkza8KXMOhosGhrX0fOEjHJSC1LKk=; b=eGR0xOwIYD3rQITahj9YQd5OnJvwEzvqDuWwXV0gaWff8LCBDEy7Sr40 8zkeZSZPwAyiSqmffd7oNTnAvzqWez93N984bvqNz5FS0H2DFU4kwlW6y FaLOV5wwMTlcnP6QVpikf1MSQWLcCmK6e1ajNqnlQV03crpBf7oclLEoW E=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: An0FACU2+lGtJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABbgwY1gxm7foEgFnSCJAEBAQMBAQEBNzQLBQsCAQg2ECcLJQIEDgWICgYMuSEEj1QzB4MZcwOXX5FOgxQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,793,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="242280577" Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Aug 2013 10:23:50 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com [173.36.12.78]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r71ANnqb009870 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 1 Aug 2013 10:23:50 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.5.98]) by xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com ([173.36.12.78]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 05:23:49 -0500 From: "Jan Medved (jmedved)" To: Julien Meuric Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Thread-Index: AQHOjpmjVGcQrYCCnkSKS6orsbO/O5mAJTke Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 10:23:49 +0000 Message-ID: <064152BB-7BDC-4227-8BEC-B638EFF3688D@cisco.com> References: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "pce@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 10:26:43 -0000 Support, as a contributing author=20 Jan Sent from my iPhone On Aug 1, 2013, at 11:29 AM, "Julien Meuric" wro= te: > Hi all. >=20 > Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to= get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-zhang-pce-state= ful-pce-app-04 as a foundation for a WG document? >=20 > Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for th= e latter, comments would be useful). >=20 > Regards, >=20 > JP & Julien >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From loa@pi.nu Thu Aug 1 03:30:30 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE5C21F9FF1 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 03:30:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.874 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.874 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.726, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8yeTnMP439GO for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 03:30:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B35B21F9A57 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 03:30:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.129.67.174] (dhcp-43ae.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.67.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CD941800272 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 12:30:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <51FA38C1.5050909@pi.nu> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 12:30:25 +0200 From: Loa Andersson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pce@ietf.org References: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> <064152BB-7BDC-4227-8BEC-B638EFF3688D@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <064152BB-7BDC-4227-8BEC-B638EFF3688D@cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 10:30:30 -0000 Folks, I think this is good start and should be made a wg doc. /Loa On 2013-08-01 12:23, Jan Medved (jmedved) wrote: > Support, as a contributing author > > > Jan > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Aug 1, 2013, at 11:29 AM, "Julien Meuric" wrote: > >> Hi all. >> >> Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 as a foundation for a WG document? >> >> Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for the latter, comments would be useful). >> >> Regards, >> >> JP & Julien >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pce mailing list >> Pce@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > -- Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 From Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com Thu Aug 1 04:10:34 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420A021E80B0 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:10:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.161 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.161 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.438, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MZQNZqXOJVHq for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:10:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ENFICSETS1.metaswitch.com (enficsets1.metaswitch.com [192.91.191.38]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C32521F8F24 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:10:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ENFIRHMBX1.datcon.co.uk (172.18.74.36) by ENFICSETS1.metaswitch.com (172.18.4.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.342.3; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 12:09:39 +0100 Received: from ENFICSMBX1.datcon.co.uk ([fe80::d5d5:c683:a3be:3a19]) by ENFIRHMBX1.datcon.co.uk ([fe80::b06d:4d13:5f63:3715%19]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 12:10:17 +0100 From: Jonathan Hardwick To: "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Thread-Index: AQHOjpmbypM/A/Om5EqdVxzGUkRkYpmAMgZw Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:10:17 +0000 Message-ID: <09CE6C3BE5E1EA40B987BF5F25D8DDBAE10F9930@ENFICSMBX1.datcon.co.uk> References: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.34.177] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:10:34 -0000 Yes, I support this as a WG document. Cheers Jon -----Original Message----- From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julie= n Meuric Sent: 01 August 2013 11:28 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Hi all. Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like=20 to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support=20 draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 as a foundation for a WG document? Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for=20 the latter, comments would be useful). Regards, JP & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From yosuke.tanaka@ntt.com Thu Aug 1 04:13:08 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9143D21E805F for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:13:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DEQzwZrNO6Ob for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgw020.noc.ntt.com (mgw020.noc.ntt.com [210.160.55.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601F221F8FB4 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from c0044i0.coe.ntt.com (unknown [10.18.161.13]) by mgw020.noc.ntt.com (NTT Com MailSV) with ESMTP id 9908F4460A5D; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 20:13:03 +0900 (JST) Received: from C0036I0.coe.ntt.com (10.18.160.40) by c0044i0.coe.ntt.com (10.18.161.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.438.0; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 20:12:58 +0900 Received: from C0007I0.coe.ntt.com ([169.254.1.138]) by C0036I0.coe.ntt.com ([10.18.160.40]) with mapi id 14.01.0438.000; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 20:13:03 +0900 From: Yosuke Tanaka To: Julien Meuric , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Thread-Index: AQHOjpmZcpERQ/LgMU2TqEztgPIbuJmAMq8Q Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:13:02 +0000 Message-ID: <4382467A240ADE4C8552523C24D51B5757FEF4E3@C0007I0.coe.ntt.com> References: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> Accept-Language: ja-JP, en-US Content-Language: ja-JP X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.25.2.138] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:13:08 -0000 Support. Yosuke -----Original Message----- From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 6:28 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Hi all. Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 as a foundation for a WG document? Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for the latter, comments would be useful). Regards, JP & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From huaimo.chen@huawei.com Thu Aug 1 04:14:46 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA33A21E80A3 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:14:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1qdOsLaoQe3T for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:14:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B404C21E809A for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:14:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AVQ22239; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:14:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 12:14:07 +0100 Received: from DFWEML407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.132) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 12:14:20 +0100 Received: from DFWEML509-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.11.169]) by dfweml407-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.132]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:14:15 -0700 From: Huaimo Chen To: Julien Meuric , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Thread-Index: AQHOjpoNd8AJJlZzAUu2FTYDbf3kgpmAMt4Q Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:14:14 +0000 Message-ID: <5316A0AB3C851246A7CA5758973207D4451E5DFD@dfweml509-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.212.244.228] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:14:46 -0000 Support. BR, Huaimo -----Original Message----- From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julie= n Meuric Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 5:28 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Hi all. Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to g= et the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 as a foundation for a WG document? Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for the = latter, comments would be useful). Regards, JP & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From zhang.xian@huawei.com Thu Aug 1 04:17:27 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C3C11E80D1 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:17:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.096 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.701, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YsvZ2cUqRRdF for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:17:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 412D811E8105 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:17:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ATZ68598; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:17:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 12:16:52 +0100 Received: from SZXEML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.32) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 12:17:04 +0100 Received: from SZXEML510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.4]) by szxeml402-hub.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:16:12 +0800 From: "Zhangxian (Xian)" To: Yosuke Tanaka , Julien Meuric , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Thread-Index: AQHOjpoLl8G3NNVsS0SieTwDk9vWFpl/rNwAgACGkQE= Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:16:11 +0000 Message-ID: References: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com>, <4382467A240ADE4C8552523C24D51B5757FEF4E3@C0007I0.coe.ntt.com> In-Reply-To: <4382467A240ADE4C8552523C24D51B5757FEF4E3@C0007I0.coe.ntt.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.47.140.37] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:17:27 -0000 WWVzOyBzdXBwb3J0IGFzIGNvLWF1dGhvci4NCg0KQ2hlZXJzLA0KWGlhbg0KDQpfX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQq3orz+yMs6IHBjZS1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYu b3JnIFtwY2UtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gtPqx7SBZb3N1a2UgVGFuYWthIFt5b3N1a2UudGFu YWthQG50dC5jb21dDQq3osvNyrG85DogMjAxM8TqONTCMcjVIDE5OjEzDQq1vTogSnVsaWVuIE1l dXJpYzsgcGNlQGlldGYub3JnDQrW98ziOiBSZTogW1BjZV0gUG9sbCBmb3IgQWRvcHRpb24gb2Yg ZHJhZnQtemhhbmctcGNlLXN0YXRlZnVsLXBjZS1hcHAtMDQNCg0KU3VwcG9ydC4NCg0KWW9zdWtl DQoNCi0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQpGcm9tOiBwY2UtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9y ZyBbbWFpbHRvOnBjZS1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXSBPbiBCZWhhbGYgT2YgSnVsaWVuIE1ldXJp Yw0KU2VudDogVGh1cnNkYXksIEF1Z3VzdCAwMSwgMjAxMyA2OjI4IFBNDQpUbzogcGNlQGlldGYu b3JnDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBbUGNlXSBQb2xsIGZvciBBZG9wdGlvbiBvZiBkcmFmdC16aGFuZy1wY2Ut c3RhdGVmdWwtcGNlLWFwcC0wNA0KDQpIaSBhbGwuDQoNCkZvbGxvd2luZyB0aGUgcG9sbCBpbiB0 aGUgcm9vbSBkdXJpbmcgeWVzdGVyZGF5IG1lZXRpbmcsIHdlIHdvdWxkIGxpa2UNCnRvIGdldCB0 aGUgZmVlZGJhY2sgb2YgdGhlIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdDogZG8geW91IHN1cHBvcnQNCmRyYWZ0LXpo YW5nLXBjZS1zdGF0ZWZ1bC1wY2UtYXBwLTA0IGFzIGEgZm91bmRhdGlvbiBmb3IgYSBXRyBkb2N1 bWVudD8NCg0KUGxlYXNlIGV4cHJlc3MgeW91ciBzdXBwb3J0IG9yIG9wcG9zaXRpb24gb24gdGhl IFBDRSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QgKGZvcg0KdGhlIGxhdHRlciwgY29tbWVudHMgd291bGQgYmUgdXNl ZnVsKS4NCg0KUmVnYXJkcywNCg0KSlAgJiBKdWxpZW4NCg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NClBjZSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNClBjZUBpZXRmLm9y Zw0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9wY2UNCl9fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQpQY2UgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQpQ Y2VAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vcGNl From vlopez@tid.es Thu Aug 1 04:19:14 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED7711E8105 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:19:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vd-HMdFVksqY for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:19:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from correo-bck.tid.es (correo-bck.tid.es [195.235.93.200]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 642D821F9C01 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:19:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sbrightmailg02.hi.inet (Sbrightmailg02.hi.inet [10.95.78.105]) by tid.hi.inet (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0MQU0094BNFURJ@tid.hi.inet> for pce@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 13:19:06 +0200 (MEST) Received: from vanvan (vanvan.hi.inet [10.95.78.49]) by sbrightmailg02.hi.inet (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 3B.80.25575.9244AF15; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 13:19:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from correo.tid.es (mailhost.hi.inet [10.95.64.100]) by tid.hi.inet (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPS id <0MQU00947NFTRJ@tid.hi.inet> for pce@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 13:19:05 +0200 (MEST) Received: from EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet ([169.254.2.81]) by EX10-HTCAS7-MAD.hi.inet ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 13:19:06 +0200 Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:19:04 +0000 From: Victor Lopez In-reply-to: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> X-Originating-IP: [10.95.64.115] To: Julien Meuric , "pce@ietf.org" Message-id: Content-id: <2C745658C7D60C4481A344C74C23D581@hi.inet> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-language: es-ES Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Accept-Language: es-ES, en-US Thread-topic: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 Thread-index: AQHOjpqiBPGHnRc38k2Hr5yt1Pc395mANKQA user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.5.130515 X-AuditID: 0a5f4e69-b7fca8e0000063e7-e1-51fa4429d5eb X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrJLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXCFe9nqKvl8ivQ4M0HZoum+zfYHRg9liz5 yRTAGMVlk5Kak1mWWqRvl8CVsfzsHNaCp+wVNz4uZ29g3MfWxcjJISFgIvF/9X0mCFtM4sK9 9UBxLg4hge2MEl82tbNCON8ZJT5camQBqRISmMYo8fZ4BIjNIqAqsePnNXYQm01ASWLDtj1A 3RwcwgL+Eq2fREDCnAJaEv2HVrJALFCQ+HPuMZgtIuAt8e3aI1YQmxeopvfvErAjmAXMJCbf OMEMEReU+DH5HgtEXEei9/s3ZghbXGLOr4msELa2xJN3F8BsRgFZiZXnTzNCzA+QeD9/KzOE bSSx5OIKsDNFBfQkDu95zQpxj4DEkj3nmSFsUYmXj/+xTmAUn4XkjFlIzpiF5IxZSM6YheSM BYysqxjFipOKMtMzSnITM3PSDYz0MjL1MvNSSzYxQqIrcwfj8p0qhxgFOBiVeHgztv4MFGJN LCuuzD3EKMHBrCTC+1jjV6AQb0piZVVqUX58UWlOavEhRiYOTqkGRinNGu3ctaujU9Ztrrdb krkn+8gDh4i1hebzVQs6d7cwK0SZ5WUKssrW3gg8z/5mZ+ZflZsvG0UCTJ5l6Gw0bGHO6IuM /Zxam6c9596/lLtB/D/WSDr3tP7/HTKD88RVaf7uqwpeSmvMhYvnbv7gV8x0pu9dc92HS5yL jlTLXeG+EGR5b4GVEktxRqKhFnNRcSIAy+ffNYwCAAA= Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:19:14 -0000 Support Victor El 01/08/13 11:30, "Julien Meuric" escribi=F3: >Hi again. > >Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like >to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support >draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 as a foundation for a WG document? > >Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for >the latter, comments would be useful). > >Regards, > >JP & Julien > >_______________________________________________ >Pce mailing list >Pce@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nu= estra pol=EDtica de env=EDo y recepci=F3n de correo electr=F3nico en el enl= ace situado m=E1s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and re= ceive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From ramon.casellas@cttc.es Thu Aug 1 04:20:19 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB8311E8105 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:20:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X9PkIuE1mYBz for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:20:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from villa.puc.rediris.es (villa.puc.rediris.es [IPv6:2001:720:418:ca00::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E2C11E8111 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:20:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [84.88.62.208] (helo=leo) by villa.puc.rediris.es with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V4qvP-0004d1-VS; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 13:20:08 +0200 Received: from [130.129.68.176] (dhcp-44b0.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.68.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by leo (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 724E61FDF4; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:20:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Envelope-From: ramon.casellas@cttc.es Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 13:20:02 +0200 Message-ID: Importance: normal From: Ramon Casellas To: Julien Meuric , "pce@ietf.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--_com.android.email_369641788813990" X-Spamina-Bogosity: Ham Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ramon Casellas List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:20:19 -0000 ----_com.android.email_369641788813990 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 TGlrZXdpc2UsIHN1cHBvcnQgYXMgY29udHJpYnV0aW5nIMKgYXV0aG9yCgpCZXN0IHJlZ2FyZHMs ClJhbW9u ----_com.android.email_369641788813990 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWw+PGhlYWQ+PG1ldGEgaHR0cC1lcXVpdj0iQ29udGVudC1UeXBlIiBjb250ZW50PSJ0ZXh0 L2h0bWw7IGNoYXJzZXQ9VVRGLTgiPjwvaGVhZD48Ym9keSA+PGRpdj5MaWtld2lzZSwgc3VwcG9y dCBhcyBjb250cmlidXRpbmcgJm5ic3A7YXV0aG9yPC9kaXY+PGRpdj48YnI+PC9kaXY+QmVzdCBy ZWdhcmRzLDxkaXY+UmFtb248L2Rpdj48L2JvZHk+PC9odG1sPg== ----_com.android.email_369641788813990-- From zhang.xian@huawei.com Thu Aug 1 04:20:23 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABDA821F9C01 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:20:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.921 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.525, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jGKt4fH-CMRO for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:20:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408F211E8118 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:20:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ATZ68823; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:20:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 12:19:35 +0100 Received: from SZXEML451-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.194) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 12:19:48 +0100 Received: from SZXEML510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.4]) by szxeml451-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.194]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:19:41 +0800 From: "Zhangxian (Xian)" To: "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 Thread-Index: AQHOjppK6HI170tXNkqxvS4IKigQ3ZmANL3h Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:19:40 +0000 Message-ID: References: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.47.140.37] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:20:23 -0000 U3VwcG9ydC4NCg0KUmVnYXJkcywNClhpYW4NCg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fXw0Kt6K8/sjLOiBwY2UtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZyBbcGNlLWJvdW5jZXNA aWV0Zi5vcmddILT6se0gSnVsaWVuIE1ldXJpYyBbanVsaWVuLm1ldXJpY0BvcmFuZ2UuY29tXQ0K t6LLzcqxvOQ6IDIwMTPE6jjUwjHI1SAxNzozMA0Ktb06IHBjZUBpZXRmLm9yZw0K1vfM4jogW1Bj ZV0gUG9sbCBmb3IgQWRvcHRpb24gb2YgZHJhZnQtemhhbmctcGNlLWhpZXJhcmNoeS1leHRlbnNp b25zLTA0DQoNCkhpIGFnYWluLg0KDQpGb2xsb3dpbmcgdGhlIHBvbGwgaW4gdGhlIHJvb20gZHVy aW5nIHllc3RlcmRheSBtZWV0aW5nLCB3ZSB3b3VsZCBsaWtlDQp0byBnZXQgdGhlIGZlZWRiYWNr IG9mIHRoZSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3Q6IGRvIHlvdSBzdXBwb3J0DQpkcmFmdC16aGFuZy1wY2UtaGll cmFyY2h5LWV4dGVuc2lvbnMtMDQgYXMgYSBmb3VuZGF0aW9uIGZvciBhIFdHIGRvY3VtZW50Pw0K DQpQbGVhc2UgZXhwcmVzcyB5b3VyIHN1cHBvcnQgb3Igb3Bwb3NpdGlvbiBvbiB0aGUgUENFIG1h aWxpbmcgbGlzdCAoZm9yDQp0aGUgbGF0dGVyLCBjb21tZW50cyB3b3VsZCBiZSB1c2VmdWwpLg0K DQpSZWdhcmRzLA0KDQpKUCAmIEp1bGllbg0KDQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KUGNlIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KUGNlQGlldGYub3JnDQpodHRw czovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3BjZQ== From leeyoung@huawei.com Thu Aug 1 04:21:29 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC4421F9306 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:21:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OJilxbxdquYc for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:21:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60CFC21F9377 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:21:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AVQ22792; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:20:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 12:20:21 +0100 Received: from DFWEML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.102) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 12:20:34 +0100 Received: from dfweml511-mbs.china.huawei.com ([169.254.15.12]) by dfweml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.102]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:20:29 -0700 From: Leeyoung To: Julien Meuric , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 Thread-Index: AQHOjppPneQ3HO0Mmk+Dbgvpc7PLZpmANPqQ Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:20:28 +0000 Message-ID: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E172916556C@dfweml511-mbs.china.huawei.com> References: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.200.217.25] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:21:29 -0000 Yes, support. Young -----Original Message----- From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julie= n Meuric Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 4:31 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 Hi again. Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to g= et the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 as a foundation for a WG document? Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for the = latter, comments would be useful). Regards, JP & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From cyril.margaria@coriant.com Thu Aug 1 04:23:49 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4081011E80DF for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:23:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.527 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.527 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.072, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TjRjRqzo3fmm for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:23:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co1ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.187]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0600221F93E4 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:23:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail124-co1-R.bigfish.com (10.243.78.236) by CO1EHSOBE036.bigfish.com (10.243.66.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:23:42 +0000 Received: from mail124-co1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail124-co1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C74D3780216; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:23:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.253.53; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:DB3PRD0411HT004.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -25 X-BigFish: PS-25(zz9371Ic89bh542I1432I31c5I14ffIzz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1de098h1033IL1de096h8275dh1de097hz2fh2a8h668h839h947hd25hf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1d07h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1de9h1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1155h) Received-SPF: pass (mail124-co1: domain of coriant.com designates 157.56.253.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.253.53; envelope-from=cyril.margaria@coriant.com; helo=DB3PRD0411HT004.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; Received: from mail124-co1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail124-co1 (MessageSwitch) id 1375356220391617_23834; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CO1EHSMHS003.bigfish.com (unknown [10.243.78.251]) by mail124-co1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BFDF2C004A; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DB3PRD0411HT004.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (157.56.253.53) by CO1EHSMHS003.bigfish.com (10.243.66.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:23:40 +0000 Received: from DB3PRD0411MB427.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.6.251]) by DB3PRD0411HT004.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.73.39]) with mapi id 14.16.0341.000; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:23:38 +0000 From: "Margaria, Cyril (Coriant - DE/Munich)" To: Julien Meuric , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Thread-Index: AQHOjpmbX74pSiL1Nk68/UUcLY3VL5mANdoQ Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:23:37 +0000 Message-ID: <523C37072C291347B9730C9291CCA07D0D1F03@DB3PRD0411MB427.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> References: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [130.129.21.250] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: coriant.com X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:23:49 -0000 Hi,=20 Support Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen / Best Regards Cyril Margaria > -----Original Message----- > From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jul= ien > Meuric > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 11:28 AM > To: pce@ietf.org > Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 >=20 > Hi all. >=20 > Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to= get > the feedback of the mailing list: do you support > draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 as a foundation for a WG document? >=20 > Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for th= e > latter, comments would be useful). >=20 > Regards, >=20 > JP & Julien >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From cyril.margaria@coriant.com Thu Aug 1 04:24:48 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CEB021F93E4 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:24:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.706 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.706 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.893, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ksQjydB0tLA8 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:24:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co1ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.186]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE6D21F964C for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:24:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail53-co1-R.bigfish.com (10.243.78.241) by CO1EHSOBE039.bigfish.com (10.243.66.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:24:33 +0000 Received: from mail53-co1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail53-co1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2676E1001DB; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:24:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.253.53; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:DB3PRD0411HT004.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -24 X-BigFish: PS-24(zz9371Ic89bh542I1432I31c5Izz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1de098h1033IL1de096h8275dh1de097hz2fh2a8h668h839h947hd25hf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1d07h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1de9h1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1155h) Received-SPF: pass (mail53-co1: domain of coriant.com designates 157.56.253.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.253.53; envelope-from=cyril.margaria@coriant.com; helo=DB3PRD0411HT004.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; Received: from mail53-co1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail53-co1 (MessageSwitch) id 1375356271518975_19483; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CO1EHSMHS032.bigfish.com (unknown [10.243.78.232]) by mail53-co1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA65340047; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DB3PRD0411HT004.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (157.56.253.53) by CO1EHSMHS032.bigfish.com (10.243.66.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:24:31 +0000 Received: from DB3PRD0411MB427.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.6.251]) by DB3PRD0411HT004.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.73.39]) with mapi id 14.16.0341.000; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:24:20 +0000 From: "Margaria, Cyril (Coriant - DE/Munich)" To: Julien Meuric , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 Thread-Index: AQHOjppF8PxmolFR70aC402McqViFZmANfWA Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:24:19 +0000 Message-ID: <523C37072C291347B9730C9291CCA07D0D1F11@DB3PRD0411MB427.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> References: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [130.129.21.250] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: coriant.com X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:24:48 -0000 Hi,=20 Support Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen / Best Regards Cyril Margaria > -----Original Message----- > From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jul= ien > Meuric > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 11:31 AM > To: pce@ietf.org > Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-= 04 >=20 > Hi again. >=20 > Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to= get > the feedback of the mailing list: do you support > draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 as a foundation for a WG document= ? >=20 > Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for th= e > latter, comments would be useful). >=20 > Regards, >=20 > JP & Julien >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From leeyoung@huawei.com Thu Aug 1 04:25:22 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8A721E80CE for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:25:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sFRRQYgF771c for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:25:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977E721E80C7 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:25:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AVQ23165; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:25:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 12:24:48 +0100 Received: from DFWEML407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.132) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 12:25:00 +0100 Received: from dfweml511-mbs.china.huawei.com ([169.254.15.12]) by dfweml407-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.132]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:24:55 -0700 From: Leeyoung To: Julien Meuric , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Thread-Index: AQHOjpoNuczXzw7TAUSOh7QWH8mZ6ZmANfGA Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:24:54 +0000 Message-ID: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E1729165582@dfweml511-mbs.china.huawei.com> References: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.200.217.243] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:25:22 -0000 Yes, support as a contributing author Young -----Original Message----- From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julie= n Meuric Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 4:28 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Hi all. Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to g= et the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 as a foundation for a WG document? Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for the = latter, comments would be useful). Regards, JP & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From ramon.casellas@cttc.es Thu Aug 1 04:47:18 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63EBB21E809A for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:47:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uz5ZrQjFpggt for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:47:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rudy.puc.rediris.es (rudy.puc.rediris.es [IPv6:2001:720:418:ca01::132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E263721F9EC6 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:47:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [84.88.62.208] (helo=leo) by rudy.puc.rediris.es with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V4rLf-0008NO-Gu for pce@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 13:47:15 +0200 Received: from [130.129.16.57] (dhcp-1039.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.16.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by leo (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89CCD1FD41 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:47:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Envelope-From: ramon.casellas@cttc.es Message-ID: <51FA2E9F.1060005@cttc.es> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:47:11 +0200 From: Ramon Casellas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pce@ietf.org References: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamina-Bogosity: Ham Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:47:18 -0000 Support, as contributor Thanks R. From ina@juniper.net Thu Aug 1 06:50:25 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B165F21F9F12 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 06:50:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.533 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SMSdpCL65d0Z for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 06:50:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from db8outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (mail-db8lp0185.outbound.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.185]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6B221E8177 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 06:49:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail25-db8-R.bigfish.com (10.174.8.233) by DB8EHSOBE026.bigfish.com (10.174.4.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:49:44 +0000 Received: from mail25-db8 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail25-db8-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46C212401F0 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:49:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:66.129.224.53; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:P-EMF01-SAC.jnpr.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -23 X-BigFish: VPS-23(zz9371I542I14ffIzz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1de098h1033IL1de096h8275dh1de097hz2fh2a8h683h839h944hd25hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1b2fh1fb3h1d07h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1de9h1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1155h) Received-SPF: pass (mail25-db8: domain of juniper.net designates 66.129.224.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.129.224.53; envelope-from=ina@juniper.net; helo=P-EMF01-SAC.jnpr.net ; SAC.jnpr.net ; X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:157.56.232.213; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); (null); H:BLUPRD0511HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; R:internal; EFV:INT Received: from mail25-db8 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail25-db8 (MessageSwitch) id 137536498268613_25114; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DB8EHSMHS003.bigfish.com (unknown [10.174.8.237]) by mail25-db8.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0328AF40046 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from P-EMF01-SAC.jnpr.net (66.129.224.53) by DB8EHSMHS003.bigfish.com (10.174.4.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:49:39 +0000 Received: from P-CLDFE02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.60) by P-EMF01-SAC.jnpr.net (172.24.192.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.0; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 06:49:38 -0700 Received: from o365mail.juniper.net (207.17.137.149) by o365mail.juniper.net (172.24.192.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.146.0; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 06:49:39 -0700 Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (216.32.181.185) by o365mail.juniper.net (207.17.137.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.0; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 06:53:43 -0700 Received: from mail94-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.248) by CH1EHSOBE022.bigfish.com (10.43.70.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:49:37 +0000 Received: from mail94-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail94-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7C820015A for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:49:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail94-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail94-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1375364975794484_414; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:49:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1EHSMHS002.bigfish.com (snatpool3.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.226]) by mail94-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B375816023C; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:49:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLUPRD0511HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.232.213) by CH1EHSMHS002.bigfish.com (10.43.70.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:49:34 +0000 Received: from BLUPRD0511MB436.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.4.24]) by BLUPRD0511HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.135.166]) with mapi id 14.16.0329.000; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:49:33 +0000 From: Ina Minei To: Julien Meuric , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Thread-Index: AQHOjpmhebjs77ttcEiXZuQTendHJZmAXpRw Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:49:32 +0000 Message-ID: <70BDAD02381BA54CA31315A2A26A7AD30383F2C0@BLUPRD0511MB436.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> References: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [66.129.224.51] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%ORANGE.COM$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 13:50:25 -0000 Support (as co-author) -----Original Message----- From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julie= n Meuric Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 2:28 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Hi all. Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to g= et the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 as a foundation for a WG document? Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for the = latter, comments would be useful). Regards, JP & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From lberger@labn.net Thu Aug 1 07:23:49 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F0A21F9EE5 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:23:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.011 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.706, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9y86LPHFBtKU for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:23:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oproxy5.bluehost.com (oproxy5-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.38.55]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D0C4421E80DB for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:23:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 24746 invoked by uid 0); 1 Aug 2013 14:22:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by oproxy5.bluehost.com with SMTP; 1 Aug 2013 14:22:59 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=bH3JChtbv1kcpyKUt7bVEzks9E0Vh5vy14nwp31car8=; b=hktzDWFHulbSzbOPoN2/pBzQhlciPe61r8IYnYNBQT8ljPW1g88JplQQiMxQyro6Quahz25NvJGJG0lbcNIT0R603BTE3c57URmC4nGF/rdTCtcOiO4DYqRV+IDTEv3S; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:60554 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V4tmN-0003Ag-07; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 08:22:59 -0600 Message-ID: <51FA6F44.4020206@labn.net> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 16:23:00 +0200 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ramon Casellas References: <20130708093637.6172.33780.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <51DA8D3D.307@cttc.es> In-Reply-To: <51DA8D3D.307@cttc.es> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-cmfg-pce-pcep-grammar-00.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 14:23:49 -0000 Hi, I'm trying to figure out where the scope of this draft might end up. Do you think its scope will just be limited to (a) PCEP clarifications or will it also cover both (b) RBNF clarifications & changes? If it's (a) & (b) then it probably makes most sense to break each into their own documents as RBNF clarifications & changes have applicability beyond PCE, i.e., RSVP and RSVP-TE. Lou PS I think you're wrong on Exclusive Rules. For example: - when two options are mutually exclusive ::=| - and at least one is mandatory := <...> <...> - and both are optional := <...> [] <...> On 7/8/2013 11:58 AM, Ramon Casellas wrote: > Dear all, > > "Encouraged" by our beloved WG co-chair Julien ;-) we have submitted a > new I-D that discusses the issues that we have recently mentioned in the > list, concerning the implementation of a set of PCEP extensions and the > problems we have identified (such as Errata, object ordering and naming > issues, lack of consistency, ambiguous grammars, etc.). > > Although the final objective would be to facilitate interoperability and > to clarify the integration of independent normative documents by > publishing an informational document, right now our main goal is to > document the identified issues in published RFCs (and other also > relevant drafts), and to clearly state the motivations behind this work. > We have requested a 5 min slot to present them to the working group and > to get feedback about WG potential interest. > > Note that, although there are already some suggestions within the > document, our intention is to include get feedback by other implementors > and work towards an agreement about the suggested RBNF notation. > > Feedback and comments welcome, > > Thanks and best regards > Ramon of behalf of authors and contributors. > > > > > -------- Mensaje original -------- > Asunto: New Version Notification for draft-cmfg-pce-pcep-grammar-00.txt > Fecha: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 02:36:37 -0700 > De: internet-drafts@ietf.org > Para: Adrian Farrel , Oscar Gonzalez de Dios > , Cyril Margaria , Ramon > Casellas > > > > A new version of I-D, draft-cmfg-pce-pcep-grammar-00.txt > has been successfully submitted by Ramon Casellas and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Filename: draft-cmfg-pce-pcep-grammar > Revision: 00 > Title: Current issues with existing RBNF notation for PCEP messages and extensions > Creation date: 2013-07-08 > Group: Individual Submission > Number of pages: 17 > URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cmfg-pce-pcep-grammar-00.txt > Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cmfg-pce-pcep-grammar > Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cmfg-pce-pcep-grammar-00 > > > Abstract: > The PCEP protocol has been defined in [RFC5440] and later extended in > several RFCs. This document aims at documenting inconsistencies when > implementing a set of extensions and at providing a reference, > complete and formal RBNF grammar for PCEP messages, including object > ordering and precedence rules. > > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > From ramon.casellas@cttc.es Thu Aug 1 07:44:49 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632A711E8170 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:44:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nJjC3xdnJt55 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:44:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from torres.puc.rediris.es (torres.puc.rediris.es [IPv6:2001:720:418:ca00::9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C84311E814B for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:44:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [84.88.62.208] (helo=leo) by torres.puc.rediris.es with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V4u7F-0003la-Ji; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 16:44:33 +0200 Received: from [192.168.42.25] (dhcp-44b0.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.68.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by leo (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F23E1FD41; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:44:28 +0200 (CEST) X-Envelope-From: ramon.casellas@cttc.es Message-ID: <51FA7449.40803@cttc.es> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 16:44:25 +0200 From: Ramon Casellas Organization: CTTC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lou Berger References: <20130708093637.6172.33780.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <51DA8D3D.307@cttc.es> <51FA6F44.4020206@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <51FA6F44.4020206@labn.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamina-Bogosity: Ham Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-cmfg-pce-pcep-grammar-00.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 14:44:49 -0000 Lou, all Please see inline On 08/01/2013 04:23 PM, Lou Berger wrote: > Hi, > > If it's (a) & (b) then it probably makes most sense to break each into > their own documents as RBNF clarifications & changes have applicability > beyond PCE, i.e., RSVP and RSVP-TE. Undecided. Talking to Adrian as the main author of the RBNF RFC, the idea is that if PCEP work justifies extending RBNF for convenience, there could be a RBNFbis > Lou > > PS I think you're wrong on Exclusive Rules. For example: > - when two options are mutually exclusive > ::=| ok > - and at least one is mandatory > := <...> > [Ramon] Did you miss repetition here? ... if yes, that allows option1 or option2 to be repeated more than once . If no, we want to allow option1 followed by option2 In other words, exclusive or is not mutually exclusive, it's a or b or a followed by b > <...> > > - and both are optional > := <...> > [] > <...> [Ramon] The idea is a || b = | | || || = | | | | | | For example ::= [ ] ::= || || || .. if one of them can be repeated then introduce a list . This guarantees order also Thanks R. From sergio.belotti@alcatel-lucent.com Thu Aug 1 07:45:40 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0393611E8132 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:45:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -11.932 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.932 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.333, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id syFiJQbbkyXN for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:45:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4BB11E813B for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:45:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-122.lucent.com [135.239.2.122]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id r71EjVHS003597 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 1 Aug 2013 09:45:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id r71EjU9w019368 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:45:30 +0200 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA05.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.1.5]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:45:30 +0200 From: "BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)" To: Julien Meuric Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Thread-Index: AQHOjpmcG0rI5bOykkWE2vap4wfHHZmAbhNA Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 14:45:30 +0000 Message-ID: References: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.39] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33 Cc: "pce@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 14:45:40 -0000 Yes , I support . BR Sergio -----Original Message----- From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julie= n Meuric Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 11:28 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Hi all. Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like=20 to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support=20 draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 as a foundation for a WG document? Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for=20 the latter, comments would be useful). Regards, JP & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From ramon.casellas@cttc.es Thu Aug 1 07:53:06 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE3921F9EF5 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:53:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kqHrqCmaNCWs for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:52:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from navarro.puc.rediris.es (navarro.puc.rediris.es [130.206.18.131]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1C611E812F for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:52:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [84.88.62.208] (helo=leo) by navarro.puc.rediris.es with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V4uJs-0002pq-8g; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 16:57:36 +0200 Received: from [192.168.42.25] (dhcp-44b0.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.68.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by leo (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F09B1FD41; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:48:44 +0200 (CEST) X-Envelope-From: ramon.casellas@cttc.es Message-ID: <51FA754B.4060803@cttc.es> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 16:48:43 +0200 From: Ramon Casellas Organization: CTTC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lou Berger References: <20130708093637.6172.33780.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <51DA8D3D.307@cttc.es> <51FA6F44.4020206@labn.net> <51FA7449.40803@cttc.es> In-Reply-To: <51FA7449.40803@cttc.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamina-Bogosity: Ham Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-cmfg-pce-pcep-grammar-00.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 14:53:06 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 14:53:06 -0000 > [Ramon] Did you miss repetition here? ... if yes, that > allows option1 or option2 to be repeated more than once . If no, we > want to allow option1 followed by option2 > In other words, exclusive or is not mutually exclusive, it's a or b or > a followed by b Err: I meant "sequential or" From bill.wu@huawei.com Thu Aug 1 13:29:00 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015E511E80D2 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:29:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.288 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.288 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9EmV0d7VFqV0 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:28:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A75A21F9F51 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:28:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AVQ56396; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 20:28:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 21:26:46 +0100 Received: from NKGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.32) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 21:27:00 +0100 Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.43]) by nkgeml401-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.32]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 04:26:55 +0800 From: Qin Wu To: Julien Meuric , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 Thread-Index: AQHOjppI5jX9340iukqhQXWHGtOYg5mAy/Kg Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 20:26:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.200.218.220] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: [Pce] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogIFBvbGwgZm9yIEFkb3B0aW9uIG9mIGRyYWZ0LXpo?= =?gb2312?b?YW5nLXBjZS1oaWVyYXJjaHktZXh0ZW5zaW9ucy0wNA==?= X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 20:29:00 -0000 U3VwcG9ydCB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0Lg0KDQpSZWdhcmRzIQ0KLVFpbg0KLS0tLS3Tyrz+1K28/i0tLS0t DQq3orz+yMs6IHBjZS1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnIFttYWlsdG86cGNlLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5v cmddILT6se0gSnVsaWVuIE1ldXJpYw0Kt6LLzcqxvOQ6IDIwMTPE6jjUwjHI1SAxNzozMQ0KytW8 /sjLOiBwY2VAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCtb3zOI6IFtQY2VdIFBvbGwgZm9yIEFkb3B0aW9uIG9mIGRyYWZ0 LXpoYW5nLXBjZS1oaWVyYXJjaHktZXh0ZW5zaW9ucy0wNA0KDQpIaSBhZ2Fpbi4NCg0KRm9sbG93 aW5nIHRoZSBwb2xsIGluIHRoZSByb29tIGR1cmluZyB5ZXN0ZXJkYXkgbWVldGluZywgd2Ugd291 bGQgbGlrZSB0byBnZXQgdGhlIGZlZWRiYWNrIG9mIHRoZSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3Q6IGRvIHlvdSBz dXBwb3J0DQpkcmFmdC16aGFuZy1wY2UtaGllcmFyY2h5LWV4dGVuc2lvbnMtMDQgYXMgYSBmb3Vu ZGF0aW9uIGZvciBhIFdHIGRvY3VtZW50Pw0KDQpQbGVhc2UgZXhwcmVzcyB5b3VyIHN1cHBvcnQg b3Igb3Bwb3NpdGlvbiBvbiB0aGUgUENFIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdCAoZm9yIHRoZSBsYXR0ZXIsIGNv bW1lbnRzIHdvdWxkIGJlIHVzZWZ1bCkuDQoNClJlZ2FyZHMsDQoNCkpQICYgSnVsaWVuDQoNCl9f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQpQY2UgbWFpbGlu ZyBsaXN0DQpQY2VAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGlu Zm8vcGNlDQo= From giomarti@cisco.com Fri Aug 2 01:42:25 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABA811E82DC for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 01:42:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -9.606 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.606 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.993, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z-d2Xa3yiaav for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 01:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A7211E82CC for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 01:36:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=477; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1375432593; x=1376642193; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=sU4mDdsj22A/dXnyijZdbPzW7n3x5w4km/lQZIYE0is=; b=F4ANycGZb/af08bT/T4TXMGNuNu8sUIMoaSSbwVzO9T4SgL1FciFeGgt OBuR6s5RMIWzXjGW1J5raRPjFogpiPh/XbNUQXqZQy3xYQiTJajajYl2E KMSLErI0DhNOZpewqO1wpLwX+s8y8z4PLt1Vykj8UiX980YG62WMDy4Sw w=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah8FAMhu+1GtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABbgwaBBYJJvASBGxZ0giQBAQEBAgE6PQIFCwIBCCIUEDIlAgQOBQiIAga5GY9UAjEHgxlzA6ktgxeCKg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,799,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="239653178" Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Aug 2013 08:36:30 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com [173.37.183.76]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r728aT58008799 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 2 Aug 2013 08:36:29 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.213]) by xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([173.37.183.76]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 03:36:29 -0500 From: "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" To: Ramon Casellas Thread-Topic: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-cmfg-pce-pcep-grammar-00.txt Thread-Index: AQHOj1thOw0PB8EBUkScoj53lRsmrQ== Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 08:36:28 +0000 Message-ID: <0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0E15C270@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> References: <20130708093637.6172.33780.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <51DA8D3D.307@cttc.es> <51FA6F44.4020206@labn.net> <51FA7449.40803@cttc.es> In-Reply-To: <51FA7449.40803@cttc.es> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.61.164.178] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <63C764DC48E8E5499EAA8FD4BBC4AAE8@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "" Subject: Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-cmfg-pce-pcep-grammar-00.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 08:42:25 -0000 Ramon, couple of questions here: On Aug 1, 2013, at 16:44 , Ramon Casellas wrote: > The idea is > a || b =3D | | > || || =3D | | | | | | = 1/ oder is important ( || is different from || )? 2/ repetitions are not allowed, right? I mean, one of the resulting combin= ations of || cannot contain twice the the same term =20 cheers G= From ramon.casellas@cttc.es Fri Aug 2 02:09:53 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2B711E836D for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 02:09:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.554 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M35OQkf+D-8Z for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 02:09:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from navarro.puc.rediris.es (navarro.puc.rediris.es [IPv6:2001:720:418:ca01::131]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF85311E82E7 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 02:07:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [84.88.62.208] (helo=leo) by navarro.puc.rediris.es with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V5BSv-0003A6-TL; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 11:16:05 +0200 Received: from [10.25.11.184] (unknown [46.189.28.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by leo (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E5411FD41; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 11:07:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Envelope-From: ramon.casellas@cttc.es Message-ID: <51FB76C3.1090707@cttc.es> Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 11:07:15 +0200 From: Ramon Casellas Organization: CTTC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" References: <20130708093637.6172.33780.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <51DA8D3D.307@cttc.es> <51FA6F44.4020206@labn.net> <51FA7449.40803@cttc.es> <0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0E15C270@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0E15C270@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamina-Bogosity: Ham Cc: "" Subject: Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-cmfg-pce-pcep-grammar-00.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 09:09:53 -0000 On 08/02/2013 10:36 AM, Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti) wrote: > 1/ oder is important ( || is different from || )? Yes; imho it is inline with default RBNF behavior regarding ordering > 2/ repetitions are not allowed, right? I mean, one of the resulting > combinations of || cannot contain twice the the same term > cheers G Correct; although allowing repetitions is trivial, introducing a list, provided that your intent is to have repetition grouped, e.g.; ::= ( || || ...) ERO - BANDWIDTH - Z or ERO - METRIC - METRIC - METRIC are successfully parsed Thanks R. From scheruathur@juniper.net Tue Aug 6 09:34:15 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E851121E8088 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 09:34:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id teUmnIEXIg6Y for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 09:34:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co1ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCC121E8086 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 09:34:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail96-co1-R.bigfish.com (10.243.78.235) by CO1EHSOBE015.bigfish.com (10.243.66.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:34:10 +0000 Received: from mail96-co1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail96-co1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E40D00120; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:34:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.101; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -21 X-BigFish: PS-21(zz9371I542I14ffIzz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1de098h1033IL1de096h8275dh1de097hz2fh2a8h668h839h944hd24hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1d07h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1de9h1dfeh1dffh1e1dh9a9j1155h) Received-SPF: pass (mail96-co1: domain of juniper.net designates 157.56.240.101 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.101; envelope-from=scheruathur@juniper.net; helo=BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(53754006)(199002)(13464003)(189002)(377454003)(77096001)(51856001)(74366001)(81542001)(79102001)(54356001)(81342001)(46102001)(74706001)(16406001)(54316002)(50986001)(69226001)(53806001)(80976001)(74876001)(33646001)(65816001)(66066001)(19580395003)(74502001)(47446002)(83322001)(19580385001)(19580405001)(56816003)(76796001)(80022001)(76482001)(83072001)(74316001)(77982001)(76786001)(31966008)(63696002)(74662001)(49866001)(4396001)(47736001)(47976001)(59766001)(56776001)(76576001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2PR05MB210; H:BL2PR05MB211.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:66.129.224.36; RD:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; Received: from mail96-co1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail96-co1 (MessageSwitch) id 1375806847263335_11791; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:34:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CO1EHSMHS032.bigfish.com (unknown [10.243.78.230]) by mail96-co1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B054AA0049; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:34:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.101) by CO1EHSMHS032.bigfish.com (10.243.66.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:34:02 +0000 Received: from BL2PR05MB210.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.198.145) by BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.100.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.341.1; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:34:02 +0000 Received: from BL2PR05MB211.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.198.146) by BL2PR05MB210.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.198.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.731.16; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:34:01 +0000 Received: from BL2PR05MB211.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.5.230]) by BL2PR05MB211.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.5.230]) with mapi id 15.00.0731.000; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:34:01 +0000 From: Sudhir Cheruathur To: Julien Meuric , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Thread-Index: AQHOjpmhCnGp+qL+AUOjO2XX+Jp2ZpmIaB1w Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:34:00 +0000 Message-ID: <743f1412b8644b2dabfc00c5313305d1@BL2PR05MB211.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> References: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [66.129.224.36] x-forefront-prvs: 0930AAFAD9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 16:34:16 -0000 Support. Thanks regds Sudhir C -----Original Message----- From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julie= n Meuric Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 2:28 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Hi all. Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to g= et the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 as a foundation for a WG document? Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for the = latter, comments would be useful). Regards, JP & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From akwong@juniper.net Tue Aug 6 09:52:14 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8872E21F8DDD for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 09:52:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fPGamHnICtkP for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 09:52:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E2121F89C3 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 09:52:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail35-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.250) by CH1EHSOBE014.bigfish.com (10.43.70.64) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:52:08 +0000 Received: from mail35-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail35-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B74400378; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:52:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.101; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -22 X-BigFish: PS-22(zz9371I542I4015I14ffIzz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1de098h1033IL1de096h8275dh1de097hz2fh2a8h668h839h944hd24hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1d07h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1de9h1dfeh1dffh1e1dh9a9j1155h) Received-SPF: pass (mail35-ch1: domain of juniper.net designates 157.56.240.101 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.101; envelope-from=akwong@juniper.net; helo=BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(377454003)(53754006)(199002)(164054003)(189002)(13464003)(76796001)(77982001)(65816001)(76576001)(54316002)(81342001)(54356001)(16406001)(83072001)(77096001)(66066001)(56816003)(76786001)(80022001)(46102001)(74876001)(33646001)(56776001)(63696002)(74316001)(79102001)(81542001)(80976001)(31966008)(47446002)(47976001)(51856001)(4396001)(69226001)(74366001)(47736001)(19580395003)(74662001)(19580385001)(59766001)(76482001)(74502001)(19580405001)(49866001)(53806001)(50986001)(74706001)(83322001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR05MB224; H:BY2PR05MB223.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:66.129.232.2; RD:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; Received: from mail35-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail35-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1375807922917533_19104; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1EHSMHS025.bigfish.com (snatpool2.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.237]) by mail35-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EB71C006F; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.101) by CH1EHSMHS025.bigfish.com (10.43.70.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:52:01 +0000 Received: from BY2PR05MB224.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.41.140) by BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.100.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.341.1; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:52:01 +0000 Received: from BY2PR05MB223.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.41.141) by BY2PR05MB224.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.41.140) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.731.12; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:51:58 +0000 Received: from BY2PR05MB223.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.15.57]) by BY2PR05MB223.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.15.117]) with mapi id 15.00.0731.000; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:51:57 +0000 From: Ambrose Kwong To: Julien Meuric , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Thread-Index: AQHOjpmhsekTEyHsek+9Ovzpx1UKX5mIbSVw Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:51:57 +0000 Message-ID: <46f13f7b804b406288876596f198b36b@BY2PR05MB223.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> References: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [66.129.232.2] x-forefront-prvs: 0930AAFAD9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 16:52:14 -0000 Support. Thanks, Ambrose -----Original Message----- From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julie= n Meuric Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 5:28 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Hi all. Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to g= et the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 as a foundation for a WG document? Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for the = latter, comments would be useful). Regards, JP & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From pratiravi@gmail.com Tue Aug 6 18:38:19 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAEBB21E80C8 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 18:38:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.933 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.933 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, SARE_HTML_USL_OBFU=1.666] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jDc4BNsL1pOh for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 18:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-x234.google.com (mail-lb0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FDFC21E80E8 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 18:38:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id a16so1061760lbj.39 for ; Tue, 06 Aug 2013 18:38:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=wUUBEiDvtVvmxC/MC+JvRHEo/iLdUUjD3eOmJM/O0sU=; b=pnY7qy1XzHrlPqdOvn6OmadHRgykRHyEiRRNsbBfIXcE5DMRrUpOU27uzyx8Tw78DO sstnVSTlKdD0uwiETE7Sceo3L51qIa+cgUWNAyj4Z56ZkM0plFXgzM7RaH8n2m+apKOF M+zGwgW6tfRjEgXAKh41iIQB7yD1uI6QemDuQi/kKsX5LE+HfAREXKppqU5w8GsG0QVa NU3IdI4PZIC6GelorM2RIWvpNab42q1vMTpf30t+tXG3F/QDOKCA1yy0rGGfXyGOuwGq /COpn6Wix20M9oPTTYHmWT1jgnNzX1YIGojRX+BEEgnlOtwPPB6qXdpCRxXYhY+ig+WP beYw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.87.101 with SMTP id w5mr347057laz.48.1375839490528; Tue, 06 Aug 2013 18:38:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.130.10 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 18:38:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> References: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 21:38:10 -0400 Message-ID: From: Ravi Torvi To: Julien Meuric Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c345c819d9ca04e35198b9 Cc: "pce@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 01:38:19 -0000 --001a11c345c819d9ca04e35198b9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Support.. Best, Ravi On Thursday, August 1, 2013, Julien Meuric wrote: > Hi all. > > Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to > get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support > draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-**app-04 as a foundation for a WG document? > > Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for the > latter, comments would be useful). > > Regards, > > JP & Julien > > ______________________________**_________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/pce > -- http://www.google.com/profiles/pratiravi --001a11c345c819d9ca04e35198b9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Support..
Best,


--
http://www.google.com/profiles/pratiravi
--001a11c345c819d9ca04e35198b9-- From udayasree.palle@huawei.com Wed Aug 7 21:15:03 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977C611E819C for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 21:15:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.15 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT=1.449, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QzlgsuOQ8Sag for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 21:14:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1601B11E81A9 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 21:14:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AVV40873; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 04:14:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 05:14:45 +0100 Received: from SZXEML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.32) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 05:14:56 +0100 Received: from blrprnc05ns (10.18.96.94) by szxeml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 12:14:49 +0800 From: Udayasree To: "'Julien Meuric'" , References: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 09:44:48 +0530 Organization: htipl Message-ID: <001301ce93ed$d2fcacf0$78f606d0$@palle@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac6OmgiOSM/2zzLXRuWeL5O4U3STqwFU8Nvg Content-Language: en-us X-Originating-IP: [10.18.96.94] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: udayasree.palle@huawei.com List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 04:15:03 -0000 I support -----Original Message----- From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 2:58 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Hi all. Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 as a foundation for a WG document? Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for the latter, comments would be useful). Regards, JP & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From udayasree.palle@huawei.com Wed Aug 7 21:15:25 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E065111E81AC for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 21:15:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.15 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT=1.449, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9ZnZV3tQg+Nq for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 21:15:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F64C11E81A3 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 21:15:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AVV40891; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 04:15:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 05:15:05 +0100 Received: from SZXEML423-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.162) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 05:15:18 +0100 Received: from blrprnc05ns (10.18.96.94) by szxeml423-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.162) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 12:15:10 +0800 From: Udayasree To: "'Julien Meuric'" , References: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 09:45:06 +0530 Organization: htipl Message-ID: <001401ce93ed$df3e5720$9dbb0560$@palle@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac6OmkTCLnVb89UbQUipPFEN3cwEMAFU5V5g Content-Language: en-us X-Originating-IP: [10.18.96.94] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: udayasree.palle@huawei.com List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 04:15:25 -0000 Support -----Original Message----- From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 3:01 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 Hi again. Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 as a foundation for a WG document? Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for the latter, comments would be useful). Regards, JP & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From avantika.sushilkumar@huawei.com Wed Aug 7 23:41:30 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269EB21F9B6A for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 23:41:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kjz4m1wmixoB for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 23:41:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E089121F843F for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 23:41:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AUE84061; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 06:41:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 07:40:54 +0100 Received: from SZXEML451-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.194) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 07:41:06 +0100 Received: from SZXEML550-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.103]) by szxeml451-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.194]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:41:00 +0800 From: Avantika To: Julien Meuric , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Thread-Index: AQHOjpoMtl4jU7VxrEq21P1MYWlUXZmKOFMAgACudXA= Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 06:41:00 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-IN, en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.18.152.79] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 06:41:30 -0000 Support! -----Original Message----- From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julie= n Meuric Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 2:58 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Hi all. Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to g= et the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 as a foundation for a WG document? Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for the = latter, comments would be useful). Regards, JP & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From avantika.sushilkumar@huawei.com Wed Aug 7 23:41:30 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A7521F843F for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 23:41:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bq5FwnZX1ob7 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 23:41:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CB421F8526 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 23:41:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AUE84068; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 06:41:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 07:41:00 +0100 Received: from SZXEML458-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.201) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 07:41:13 +0100 Received: from SZXEML550-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.103]) by SZXEML458-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.201]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:41:07 +0800 From: Avantika To: "pce@ietf.org" , Julien Meuric Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 Thread-Index: AQHOk+/55DrJwrXsnEewRMj54qbw2ZmK272g Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 06:41:06 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-IN, en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.18.152.79] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 06:41:30 -0000 Support! -----Original Message----- From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julie= n Meuric Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 3:01 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 Hi again. Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to g= et the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 as a foundation for a WG document? Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for the = latter, comments would be useful). Regards, JP & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From ogondio@tid.es Thu Aug 8 02:34:57 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8D621F8267 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 02:34:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.885 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.885 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LX9tpnPHVh9A for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 02:34:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tidos.tid.es (tidos.tid.es [195.235.93.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD09811E8116 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 02:34:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sbrightmailg01.hi.inet (sbrightmailg01.hi.inet [10.95.64.104]) by tid.hi.inet (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0MR700EOHHA123@tid.hi.inet> for pce@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 11:34:49 +0200 (MEST) Received: from tid (tid.hi.inet [10.95.64.10]) by sbrightmailg01.hi.inet (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id EA.87.24502.93663025; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 11:34:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from correo.tid.es (mailhost.hi.inet [10.95.64.100]) by tid.hi.inet (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0MR700EODHA123@tid.hi.inet> for pce@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 11:34:49 +0200 (MEST) Received: from EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet ([169.254.2.81]) by EX10-HTCAS6-MAD.hi.inet ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 11:34:50 +0200 Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 09:33:04 +0000 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Oscar_Gonz=E1lez_de_Dios?= In-reply-to: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> To: Julien Meuric Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-language: es-ES Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Accept-Language: es-ES, en-US Thread-topic: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 Thread-index: AQHOjpqiE3+6LeNHG0SGvCE4LVm5+JmLF9VR X-AuditID: 0a5f4068-b7fab8e000005fb6-fb-52036639378d X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrALMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXCFe/ApWuZxhxksPKvlUXT/RvsDoweS5b8 ZApgjOKySUnNySxLLdK3S+DKONV2lblgC0fFnPe/WBoYP7J1MXJySAiYSJw7cIMFwhaTuHBv PVCci0NIYCOjxL0na9khnG+MEtumnWGBcKYxSrT9uMoM0sIioCox++97VhCbTcBBYt2iXqB2 Dg5hAX+J1k8iIGFOAS2J/kMrwTaICOhInH9/hh2khFlAUeLdbV4Qk1fAUqKrKRSkgldAUOLH 5Htg1cxA1b3fvzFD2OISc35NZIWwtSWevLsAZjMKyEqsPH+aEWJ6gMT7+VuZIWwjid8PtzJC /CUgsWTPeWYIW1Ti5eN/YL1CApoSV/8fZ53AKDYLyepZSFbPQrJ6FpLVCxhZVjGKFScVZaZn lOQmZuakGxjqZWTqZeallmxihMRKxg7G5TtVDjEKcDAq8fA+CGIKEmJNLCuuzD3EKMHBrCTC e7EYKMSbklhZlVqUH19UmpNafIiRiYNTqoFx16TcjEy/K54uLHeSxJOaK+eGV70tWLT5xRRP vtyNS92DHv1KvrBZuGHLrVW6yndflR5aubaTZ0Hqqw+HYrIdGC4XzmRdxxc+S2Lf2Rbd+fOn bantX8Lh/2H58euiRm6zg/4+fPN475N7z79cX283U+51W2dsYdorVuO1CSrPPnMx52euvuru ocRSnJFoqMVcVJwIAC3u/cpzAgAA References: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> Cc: "pce@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 09:34:57 -0000 Support, as coauthor, Best Regards, Oscar Enviado desde mi iPhone El 01/08/2013, a las 11:36, "Julien Meuric" escr= ibi=F3: > Hi again. > > Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to= get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-zhang-pce-hiera= rchy-extensions-04 as a foundation for a WG document? > > Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for th= e latter, comments would be useful). > > Regards, > > JP & Julien > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nu= estra pol=EDtica de env=EDo y recepci=F3n de correo electr=F3nico en el enl= ace situado m=E1s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and re= ceive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From ogondio@tid.es Thu Aug 8 02:38:43 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85FF221F9EE2 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 02:38:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.092 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.207, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SbT+-uSOPBhe for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 02:38:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tidos.tid.es (tidos.tid.es [195.235.93.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4988911E8115 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 02:38:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sbrightmailg01.hi.inet (sbrightmailg01.hi.inet [10.95.64.104]) by tid.hi.inet (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0MR700E1RHGC23@tid.hi.inet> for pce@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 11:38:37 +0200 (MEST) Received: from tid (tid.hi.inet [10.95.64.10]) by sbrightmailg01.hi.inet (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 8A.B7.24502.D1763025; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 11:38:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from correo.tid.es (mailhost.hi.inet [10.95.64.100]) by tid.hi.inet (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0MR700E1VHGD23@tid.hi.inet> for pce@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 11:38:37 +0200 (MEST) Received: from EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet ([169.254.2.81]) by EX10-HTCAS6-MAD.hi.inet ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 11:38:37 +0200 Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 09:36:53 +0000 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Oscar_Gonz=E1lez_de_Dios?= In-reply-to: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> To: Julien Meuric Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-language: es-ES Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Accept-Language: es-ES, en-US Thread-topic: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Thread-index: AQHOjpmj65lzQx00Kk62UoxemutKxpmLGOnA X-AuditID: 0a5f4068-b7fab8e000005fb6-67-5203671d5220 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrILMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXCFe/ApSubzhxk8OaPkkXT/RvsDoweS5b8 ZApgjOKySUnNySxLLdK3S+DKOLV0InvBGo6K9xuusDQwvmLrYuTgkBAwkTh1NqGLkRPIFJO4 cG89UJiLQ0hgI6PE+w0PmSGcb4wS+2cuYodwpjFKfNw0hxGkhUVAVWL6zmnMIDabgIPEukW9 bCC2sIC3xNs5k1lAbE4BLYnFH4+C2SICOhLn359hB9nMLKAo8e42L0iYV8BS4uTjZ0wQtqDE j8n3wMqZgcp7v39jhrDFJeb8msgKYWtLPHl3AcxmFJCVWHn+NCPEeB+Jo3N3MUPYRhKzL+5i hPhMQGLJnvPMELaoxMvH/8B6hQQ0Jb7Nu8A2gVFsFpLVs5CsnoVk9SwkqxcwsqxiFCtOKspM zyjJTczMSTcw1MvI1MvMSy3ZxAiJlowdjMt3qhxiFOBgVOLhfRDEFCTEmlhWXJl7iFGCg1lJ hPdiMVCINyWxsiq1KD++qDQntfgQIxMHp1QDo/4aqcTtwmHzBNw/NMbZqKk/7q7a45LLt7BC YX1K+YNJJxqrJwe8XLj6yJ3kT/emlun4TNnh9n36m+e2eTfvW53x649t+P3C7dLrXs9Pj7+x C5ybfNL7xZTtbT3fEgNT0zc/cJuVNrm/b6v6wclSOv/zfR3WdgmUirHf17r1uepEunyxepjx ZCWW4oxEQy3mouJEAPUQ0X50AgAA References: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> Cc: "pce@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 09:38:43 -0000 Support, as contributor, Regards, Oscar Enviado desde mi iPhone El 01/08/2013, a las 11:29, "Julien Meuric" escr= ibi=F3: > Hi all. > > Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to= get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-zhang-pce-state= ful-pce-app-04 as a foundation for a WG document? > > Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for th= e latter, comments would be useful). > > Regards, > > JP & Julien > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nu= estra pol=EDtica de env=EDo y recepci=F3n de correo electr=F3nico en el enl= ace situado m=E1s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and re= ceive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From bill.wu@huawei.com Mon Aug 12 01:15:30 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98BA21F9BAB for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 01:15:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.937 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.937 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.662, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yEcYNdXxe3SC for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 01:15:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F36811E80DE for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 00:49:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AUH40126; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 07:49:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:49:04 +0100 Received: from nkgeml409-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.40) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:49:28 +0100 Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.203]) by nkgeml409-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.40]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:49:23 +0800 From: Qin Wu To: "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02.txt Thread-Index: AQHOly3ARvrXahnuh0O/7pcm3F1HAJmRL2yA Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 07:49:22 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.149] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: [Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:15:31 -0000 Here is the update of DNS based PCE discovery based on the discussion we ha= d during the Berlin PCE session. Thanks Diego, Dhruv and Dan for providing inputs. The diff is: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02 The main changes are we add two new co-authors and update the motivation se= ction based on comments we received so far. Regards! -Qin -----Original Message----- From: i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] = On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 3:18 PM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. Title : Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery using Domain Na= me System(DNS) Author(s) : Qin Wu Dhruv Dhody Daniel King Diego R. Lopez Filename : draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02.txt Pages : 18 Date : 2013-08-11 Abstract: Discovery of the Path Computation Element (PCE) within an IGP area or routing domain is possible using OSPF [RFC5088] and IS-IS [RFC5089]. However, in some deployment scenarios PCEs may not wish, or be able, to participate within the IGP process, therefore it would be beneficial for the Path Computation Client (PCC) (or other PCEs) to discover PCEs via an alternative mechanism to those proposed in [RFC5088] and [RFC5089]. This document specifies the requirements, use cases, procedures and extensions to support discovery via DNS for PCE. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submissio= n until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce mailing list I-D-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt From Suresh.b.r@huawei.com Sun Aug 4 22:32:02 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710CE11E8145 for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 22:32:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.484 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.484 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT=1.449, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bJzv6Ht9Bg36 for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 22:31:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2EC711E8137 for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 22:31:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AVS79869; Mon, 05 Aug 2013 05:31:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 06:31:38 +0100 Received: from SZXEML407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.94) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 06:31:41 +0100 Received: from blrprnc03ns (10.18.96.92) by szxeml407-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.94) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 13:31:29 +0800 From: Suresh To: , "'Fatai Zhang'" References: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 11:01:28 +0530 Message-ID: <00b801ce919d$09be4300$1d3ac900$@b.r@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AQHOjppHekQPJa3X/kC5hN1XQWANuZmAH2HAgAX9PgA= Content-Language: en-us X-Originating-IP: [10.18.96.92] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 08:45:30 -0700 Subject: Re: [Pce] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogIFBvbGwgZm9yIEFkb3B0aW9uIG9mIGRyYWZ0LXpo?= =?gb2312?b?YW5nLXBjZS1oaWVyYXJjaHktZXh0ZW5zaW9ucy0wNA==?= X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 05:32:02 -0000 Support. -----Original Message----- From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of = Fatai Zhang Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 3:34 PM To: Julien Meuric; pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] =B4=F0=B8=B4: Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 Support as co-author. Fatai -----=D3=CA=BC=FE=D4=AD=BC=FE----- =B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] = =B4=FA=B1=ED Julien Meuric =B7=A2=CB=CD=CA=B1=BC=E4: 2013=C4=EA8=D4=C21=C8=D5 17:31 =CA=D5=BC=FE=C8=CB: pce@ietf.org =D6=F7=CC=E2: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of = draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 Hi again. Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like = to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 as a foundation for a WG = document? Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for = the latter, comments would be useful). Regards, JP & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From Suresh.b.r@huawei.com Wed Aug 7 21:56:42 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA51321F9B0D for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 21:56:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.333 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.333 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=3.817, BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT=1.449, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gD-rrf3MDgDS for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 21:56:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B3221F9A99 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 21:56:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AUE78865; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 04:56:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 05:56:24 +0100 Received: from SZXEML455-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.198) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 05:56:35 +0100 Received: from blrprnc03ns (10.18.96.92) by SZXEML455-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.198) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 12:56:31 +0800 From: Suresh To: References: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> <001301ce93ed$d2fcacf0$78f606d0$@palle@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <001301ce93ed$d2fcacf0$78f606d0$@palle@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 10:26:30 +0530 Message-ID: <001c01ce93f3$a63acb10$f2b06130$@b.r@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac6OmgiOSM/2zzLXRuWeL5O4U3STqwFU8NvgAAFznzA= Content-Language: en-us X-Originating-IP: [10.18.96.92] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 08:45:30 -0700 Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 04:56:42 -0000 support -----Original Message----- From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Udayasree Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 9:45 AM To: 'Julien Meuric'; pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 I support -----Original Message----- From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 2:58 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 Hi all. Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 as a foundation for a WG document? Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for the latter, comments would be useful). Regards, JP & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From julien.meuric@orange.com Thu Aug 15 09:08:31 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A418011E8174 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:08:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mjCbQkl+suKJ for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:08:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r-mail2.rd.orange.com (r-mail2.rd.orange.com [217.108.152.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40EA11E8165 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:08:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r-mail2.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 12CCB5D8B05 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:08:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.46]) by r-mail2.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D5F5D8AAC for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:08:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.44]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:08:19 +0200 Received: from [10.193.116.62] ([10.193.116.62]) by ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:08:20 +0200 Message-ID: <520CFCF4.9040004@orange.com> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:08:20 +0200 From: Julien Meuric Organization: Orange User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pce@ietf.org References: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <51FA2A2A.3000204@orange.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Aug 2013 16:08:20.0146 (UTC) FILETIME=[A8EA3920:01CE99D1] Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:08:31 -0000 Hi. The support seems clear. Authors, you may submit the same document as draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-00. Cheers, JP & Julien On 08/01/2013 11:28, Julien Meuric wrote: > Hi all. > > Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like > to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support > draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app-04 as a foundation for a WG document? > > Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for > the latter, comments would be useful). > > Regards, > > JP & Julien From julien.meuric@orange.com Thu Aug 15 09:09:26 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EBC111E8174 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:09:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lqXOd7XbaU9z for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:09:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p-mail1.rd.orange.com (p-mail1.rd.orange.com [195.101.245.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F60A11E81D9 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:09:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p-mail1.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id E78917E4003 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:09:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.47]) by p-mail1.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E090B7E4002 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:09:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.44]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:09:14 +0200 Received: from [10.193.116.62] ([10.193.116.62]) by ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:09:14 +0200 Message-ID: <520CFD2A.5090802@orange.com> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:09:14 +0200 From: Julien Meuric Organization: Orange User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pce@ietf.org References: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <51FA2AC1.4030006@orange.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Aug 2013 16:09:14.0303 (UTC) FILETIME=[C931ECF0:01CE99D1] Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:09:26 -0000 Hi. The support seems clear. Authors, you may submit the same document as draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-00. Cheers, JP & Julien On 08/01/2013 11:30, Julien Meuric wrote: > Hi again. > > Following the poll in the room during yesterday meeting, we would like > to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support > draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 as a foundation for a WG > document? > > Please express your support or opposition on the PCE mailing list (for > the latter, comments would be useful). > > Regards, > > JP & Julien > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > From internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu Aug 15 22:59:42 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D3D711E8191; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 22:59:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.587 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.587 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1uFeoSty6ETX; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 22:59:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9305F11E8113; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 22:59:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.70.p1 Message-ID: <20130816055941.20160.69955.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 22:59:41 -0700 Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-00.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 05:59:42 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of= the IETF. Title : Applicability of Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) Author(s) : Xian Zhang Ina Minei Filename : draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-00.txt Pages : 24 Date : 2013-08-15 Abstract: A stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) maintains information about Label Switched Path (LSP) characteristics and resource usage within a network in order to provide traffic engineering calculations for its associated Path Computation Clients (PCCs). This document describes general considerations for a stateful PCE deployment and examines its applicability and benefits through a number of use cases. Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) extensions required for stateful PCE usage are covered in separate documents. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From internet-drafts@ietf.org Sun Aug 18 09:47:23 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488EA11E8119; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 09:47:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.58 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.58 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bzz-CU50pgXl; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 09:47:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D240821F9AEF; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 09:47:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.70.p1 Message-ID: <20130818164722.9623.84987.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 09:47:22 -0700 Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-00.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 16:47:23 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of= the IETF. Title : Extensions to Path Computation Element Communication Pro= tocol (PCEP) for Hierarchical Path Computation Elements (PCE) Author(s) : Fatai Zhang Quintin Zhao Oscar Gonzalez de Dios Ramon Casellas Daniel King Filename : draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-00.txt Pages : 14 Date : 2013-08-18 Abstract: The Hierarchical Path Computation Element (H-PCE) architecture, defined in the companion framework document [RFC6805], provides a mechanism to allow the optimum sequence of domains to be selected, and the optimum end-to-end path to be derived through the use of a hierarchical relationship between domains. This document defines the Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) extensions for the purpose of implementing Hierarchical PCE procedures which are described in the aforementioned document. These extensions are experimental and published for examination, discussion, implementation, and evaluation. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Mon Aug 19 07:57:07 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E930711E829B; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 07:57:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.456 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.456 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.144, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pj5V-0FKn33v; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 07:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C8F11E82A0; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 07:56:32 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.70.p1 Message-ID: <20130819145632.26050.39745.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 07:56:32 -0700 Cc: pce mailing list , pce chair , RFC Editor Subject: [Pce] Document Action: 'Requirements for GMPLS applications of PCE' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-09.txt) X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:57:07 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Requirements for GMPLS applications of PCE' (draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-09.txt) as Informational RFC This document is the product of the Path Computation Element Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Adrian Farrel and Stewart Bryant. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req/ Technical Summary The initial effort of the PCE WG was specifically focused on MPLS (Multi-protocol label switching). As a next step, this draft describes functional requirements for GMPLS (Generalized MPLS) application of PCE (Path computation element). Working Group Summary No particular issue during WG processing. The I-D's scope was identified early in the WG's life, a solution document is available and almost completed. Note that the IPR disclosure that shows against this document was removed at the submitter's request (i.e., it is like it was never there). Document Quality Since this is a requirements document, there are no existing implementations and no plans to implement. Personnel Julien Meuric is the document shepherd. Adrian Farrel is the responsible Area Director. From internet-drafts@ietf.org Tue Aug 20 10:15:08 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BD111E8136; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:15:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.551 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.049, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eDe7iY6sL+36; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:15:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2C921F9B94; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:15:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.70.p1 Message-ID: <20130820171508.17714.41204.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:15:08 -0700 Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-06.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:15:08 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of= the IETF. Title : PCEP Extensions for Stateful PCE Author(s) : Edward Crabbe Jan Medved Ina Minei Robert Varga Filename : draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-06.txt Pages : 54 Date : 2013-08-20 Abstract: The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path computations in response to Path Computation Clients (PCCs) requests. Although PCEP explicitly makes no assumptions regarding the information available to the PCE, it also makes no provisions for synchronization or PCE control of timing and sequence of path computations within and across PCEP sessions. This document describes a set of extensions to PCEP to enable stateful control of MPLS-TE and GMPLS LSPs via PCEP. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-06 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-06 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From ina@juniper.net Tue Aug 20 10:23:22 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A538A11E8113 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:23:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38m5UI7491kh for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:23:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co1ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.186]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709F821F9AF8 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:23:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail173-co1-R.bigfish.com (10.243.78.226) by CO1EHSOBE035.bigfish.com (10.243.66.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:23:16 +0000 Received: from mail173-co1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail173-co1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5029250013B for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:23:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.101; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BL2PRD0510HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -21 X-BigFish: VPS-21(zz9371I936eI542Izz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1de098h1033IL17326ah1de096h8275dh1de097hz2fh2a8h839h944hd24hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1d07h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1de9h1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1fe8h1ff5h9a9j1155h) Received-SPF: pass (mail173-co1: domain of juniper.net designates 157.56.240.101 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.101; envelope-from=ina@juniper.net; helo=BL2PRD0510HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(13464003)(189002)(199002)(377454003)(377424004)(56816003)(77096001)(81686001)(74662001)(53806001)(76786001)(76796001)(54356001)(56776001)(76576001)(54316002)(76482001)(15202345003)(4396001)(74502001)(79102001)(47446002)(33646001)(77982001)(59766001)(31966008)(63696002)(46102001)(81816001)(66066001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(19580385001)(83322001)(80022001)(47976001)(50986001)(74876001)(74706001)(83072001)(49866001)(47736001)(80976001)(81542001)(74366001)(81342001)(65816001)(74316001)(69226001)(51856001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR05MB048; H:BY2PR05MB048.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:66.129.224.36; RD:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; Received: from mail173-co1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail173-co1 (MessageSwitch) id 1377019374797424_13699; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:22:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CO1EHSMHS021.bigfish.com (unknown [10.243.78.240]) by mail173-co1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8FA1C0050 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:22:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BL2PRD0510HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.101) by CO1EHSMHS021.bigfish.com (10.243.66.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:22:50 +0000 Received: from BY2PR05MB048.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.34.156) by BL2PRD0510HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.100.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.347.3; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:22:45 +0000 Received: from BY2PR05MB048.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.34.156) by BY2PR05MB048.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.34.156) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.745.25; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:22:43 +0000 Received: from BY2PR05MB048.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.9.223]) by BY2PR05MB048.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.9.223]) with mapi id 15.00.0745.000; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:22:43 +0000 From: Ina Minei To: "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-06.txt Thread-Index: AQHOncjeA2OhjSNckUuLrRCblVyOqZmeVtYA Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:22:42 +0000 Message-ID: <601dcd80c8b1491a831ff3b950a97a3b@BY2PR05MB048.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> References: <20130820171508.17714.41204.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20130820171508.17714.41204.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [66.129.224.36] x-forefront-prvs: 09443CAA7E Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% Subject: Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-06.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:23:22 -0000 Following the adoption of the applicability draft as wg document, we remove= d the use cases from draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-06. We also incorporated m= ost of the comments received on version 05. We expect to post another version before the next ietf, addressing any rema= ining issues. Ina, Ed, Jan and Robert -----Original Message----- From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of inter= net-drafts@ietf.org Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 10:15 AM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-06.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of= the IETF. Title : PCEP Extensions for Stateful PCE Author(s) : Edward Crabbe Jan Medved Ina Minei Robert Varga Filename : draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-06.txt Pages : 54 Date : 2013-08-20 Abstract: The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path computations in response to Path Computation Clients (PCCs) requests. Although PCEP explicitly makes no assumptions regarding the information available to the PCE, it also makes no provisions for synchronization or PCE control of timing and sequence of path computations within and across PCEP sessions. This document describes a set of extensions to PCEP to enable stateful control of MPLS-TE and GMPLS LSPs via PCEP. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-06 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-06 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submissio= n until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From bill.wu@huawei.com Fri Aug 23 01:54:17 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8DAC11E82E4 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 01:54:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.556 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VVu96awX3a8A for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 01:54:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F7B11E82D2 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 01:54:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AWJ01786; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:54:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:53:34 +0100 Received: from NKGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.35) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:54:07 +0100 Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.198]) by nkgeml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.35]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:53:57 +0800 From: Qin Wu To: "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: PCE domain name vs DNS domain name in draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02 Thread-Index: AQHOly3A7+ScTggG7kO5hSE6pbv4tJmRL2yAgBFRvKCAAAw8UA== Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:53:57 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.149] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: [Pce] FW: PCE domain name vs DNS domain name in draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:54:17 -0000 Hi,folks: In Berlin meeting, one open issue we raised and discussed in the PCE WG=20 session is about the relationship between PCE domain and DNS domain. The interesting questions related to this issue are=20 a.should DNS queries be based on domain name?=20 b. How do we look up PCE in AS200 or ISIS area 0?=20 c.Is there any mechanism to link the IGP area or AS to the DNS namespace. To address this issue, we authors of this draft have a lot of private discu= ssion on this. My thought is PCE domain is totally different from DNS domain name, one DNS domain name may be corresponding to one PCE domain= or=20 multiple PCE domains, one PCE domains may be also corresponding to Multiple DNS domains. RFC6120, section 3.2.4 mentions a method, which uses SRV record with an add= on service,=20 we can follow this example, add PCE domain (e.g.,AS200) as subdomain of DNS= domain name=20 (e.g.,AS200.example.com). When one DNS domain has multiple PCE domain, we c= an support multiple SRV record for the same DNS domain (e.g.,AS200.example.com, AS10.e= xample.com, ISIS.Area8.example.com associated with "example.com" DNS domain name). In addition, section 5.1 of RFC6408 gives an example: " 5.1. Examples As an example, consider a client that wishes to discover a Diameter server in the ex1.example.com realm that supports the Credit Control application. The client performs a NAPTR query for that domain, and the following NAPTR records are returned: ;; order pref flags service regexp replacement IN NAPTR 50 50 "s" "aaa:diameter.sctp" "" _diameter._sctp.ex1.example.com IN NAPTR 50 50 "s" "aaa+ap1:diameter.sctp" "" _diameter._sctp.ex1.example.com IN NAPTR 50 50 "s" "aaa+ap4:diameter.sctp" "" _diameter._sctp.ex1.example.com " So following this example, if we want to look up PCE server in the AS200, we can have something like "pc+app1:pce.tcp",app1 is corresponding to intra-AS application with _pce._tcp.AS200.example.com as result. Comments and suggestions are welcome. Regards! -Qin -----Original Message----- From: i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] = On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 3:18 PM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. Title : Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery using Domain Na= me System(DNS) Author(s) : Qin Wu Dhruv Dhody Daniel King Diego R. Lopez Filename : draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02.txt Pages : 18 Date : 2013-08-11 Abstract: Discovery of the Path Computation Element (PCE) within an IGP area or routing domain is possible using OSPF [RFC5088] and IS-IS [RFC5089]. However, in some deployment scenarios PCEs may not wish, or be able, to participate within the IGP process, therefore it would be beneficial for the Path Computation Client (PCC) (or other PCEs) to discover PCEs via an alternative mechanism to those proposed in [RFC5088] and [RFC5089]. This document specifies the requirements, use cases, procedures and extensions to support discovery via DNS for PCE. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submissio= n until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce mailing list I-D-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt From bill.wu@huawei.com Fri Aug 23 02:58:37 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A39511E816B for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 02:58:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.561 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.561 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Inz+IH17p2c8 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 02:58:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C3921F9D7B for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 02:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AUQ67653; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:58:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:57:54 +0100 Received: from nkgeml407-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.38) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:58:27 +0100 Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.198]) by nkgeml407-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.38]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 17:58:15 +0800 From: Qin Wu To: "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: NAPTR vs S-NAPTR in draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02 Thread-Index: AQHOn+dI0IptuvYRtUCSh93LFui7Uw== Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:58:14 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.149] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: [Pce] NAPTR vs S-NAPTR in draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:58:37 -0000 Hi,folks: In the current DNS based PCE discovery draft, we use NAPTR to lookup PCE se= rvice=20 and query SRV record and AAA record for a DNS domain name. In the draft, we= only=20 uses NAPTR flags 'a','s', "replacement expression", "regular expression" is= not used. The S-NAPTR procedure i.e., the "Straightforward-NAPTR" procedure, is defin= ed in=20 IETF RFC 3958 and describes a Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) ap= plication procedures on how to resolve a domain name, application service name, and = application protocol dynamically to target server and port by using both NAPTR and SRV= resource=20 records. The S-NAPTR simplifies the use of NAPTR by limiting the NAPTR flag= s only=20 to "a", "s" and "". Comparing with using NAPTR, S-NAPTR requires only a subset of NAPTR strictl= y bound=20 to domain names, without making use of the REGEXP field of NAPTR and make c= lient=20 resolution process much more predictable and efficient since multiple level= s of=20 redirection by using the "" flag and REGEXP field may lead to a deep chaini= ng of=20 resource records over time in the DNS configuration. In addition, some sadi that S-NATPR enables DNS lookup of services by using= =20 resource names while NAPTR by domain name, when using resource name We don't need to follow domain name syntax. Therefore I think using resource name is more flexible than using domain na= me=20 and it is better for this draft to base on S-NAPTR specification [RFC3958]= =20 instead of following NAPTR defined in RFC3403. Any comments or opinions? Regards! -Qin -----Original Message----- From: i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] = On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 3:18 PM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. Title : Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery using Domain Na= me System(DNS) Author(s) : Qin Wu Dhruv Dhody Daniel King Diego R. Lopez Filename : draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02.txt Pages : 18 Date : 2013-08-11 Abstract: Discovery of the Path Computation Element (PCE) within an IGP area or routing domain is possible using OSPF [RFC5088] and IS-IS [RFC5089]. However, in some deployment scenarios PCEs may not wish, or be able, to participate within the IGP process, therefore it would be beneficial for the Path Computation Client (PCC) (or other PCEs) to discover PCEs via an alternative mechanism to those proposed in [RFC5088] and [RFC5089]. This document specifies the requirements, use cases, procedures and extensions to support discovery via DNS for PCE. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submissio= n until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce mailing list I-D-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt From daniel@olddog.co.uk Sun Aug 25 11:00:25 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E6721F9C7D for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 11:00:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LTknrEFe8E0T for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 11:00:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472AA21F8F6D for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 11:00:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7PI09Eb028513; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 19:00:09 +0100 Received: from Serenity (88-97-23-122.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.97.23.122]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7PI088W028505 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 25 Aug 2013 19:00:08 +0100 From: "Daniel King" To: "'Qin Wu'" , References: In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 19:00:05 +0100 Message-ID: <01e401cea1bc$ee444c20$cacce460$@olddog.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQI4RfiTgISdObAdZFSeIrRhn4i48ZjS4UQQ Content-Language: en-gb Subject: Re: [Pce] NAPTR vs S-NAPTR in draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 18:00:25 -0000 Hi Qin, Thanks for further educating the PCE WG on the protocol mechanics of DNS :-) Two scenarios where S-NATPR may provide to be the better mechanism, assuming we need service capability query/discovery in the future. This capability discovery could be: 1. When a PCC needs to discover a H-PCE Parent PCE. 2. When a PCC needs to discover a PCE for specific capability, stateful, GCO, P2MP, etc. In each scenario the PCC would be able to discover required capability, as each query using DNS S-NATPR would provide a response that includes: Service-tag (pce) Protocol (tcp) Application (gco) This might be represented as "pce:tcp+gco"(?), the resolution process provided by S-NAPTR DDDS [RFC3958] would allow the matching SRV or A record of a suitable PCE. Actually, this type of method and capability exposes some issues. How do we enforce policy with S-NAPTR and make sure a PCE is allowed to provide path computation response, or the PCC is even allowed to send a path computation request. For authorization, CA and TLS may provide a solution. Br, Dan. -----Original Message----- From: Qin Wu [mailto:bill.wu@huawei.com] Sent: 23 August 2013 10:58 To: pce@ietf.org Cc: Dhruv Dhody; Daniel King; Diego R. Lopez Subject: NAPTR vs S-NAPTR in draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02 Hi,folks: In the current DNS based PCE discovery draft, we use NAPTR to lookup PCE service and query SRV record and AAA record for a DNS domain name. In the draft, we only uses NAPTR flags 'a','s', "replacement expression", "regular expression" is not used. The S-NAPTR procedure i.e., the "Straightforward-NAPTR" procedure, is defined in IETF RFC 3958 and describes a Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) application procedures on how to resolve a domain name, application service name, and application protocol dynamically to target server and port by using both NAPTR and SRV resource records. The S-NAPTR simplifies the use of NAPTR by limiting the NAPTR flags only to "a", "s" and "". Comparing with using NAPTR, S-NAPTR requires only a subset of NAPTR strictly bound to domain names, without making use of the REGEXP field of NAPTR and make client resolution process much more predictable and efficient since multiple levels of redirection by using the "" flag and REGEXP field may lead to a deep chaining of resource records over time in the DNS configuration. In addition, some sadi that S-NATPR enables DNS lookup of services by using resource names while NAPTR by domain name, when using resource name We don't need to follow domain name syntax. Therefore I think using resource name is more flexible than using domain name and it is better for this draft to base on S-NAPTR specification [RFC3958] instead of following NAPTR defined in RFC3403. Any comments or opinions? Regards! -Qin -----Original Message----- From: i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 3:18 PM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. Title : Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery using Domain Name System(DNS) Author(s) : Qin Wu Dhruv Dhody Daniel King Diego R. Lopez Filename : draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02.txt Pages : 18 Date : 2013-08-11 Abstract: Discovery of the Path Computation Element (PCE) within an IGP area or routing domain is possible using OSPF [RFC5088] and IS-IS [RFC5089]. However, in some deployment scenarios PCEs may not wish, or be able, to participate within the IGP process, therefore it would be beneficial for the Path Computation Client (PCC) (or other PCEs) to discover PCEs via an alternative mechanism to those proposed in [RFC5088] and [RFC5089]. This document specifies the requirements, use cases, procedures and extensions to support discovery via DNS for PCE. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce mailing list I-D-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt From bill.wu@huawei.com Mon Aug 26 23:56:23 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2473811E8156 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 23:56:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.544 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.544 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.055, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3MkF8y1kEcOj for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 23:56:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E8511E815F for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 23:56:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AUT51968; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 06:56:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 07:56:05 +0100 Received: from nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.36) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 07:56:13 +0100 Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.96]) by nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.36]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:56:01 +0800 From: Qin Wu To: Daniel King , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: NAPTR vs S-NAPTR in draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02 Thread-Index: AQHOn+dI0IptuvYRtUCSh93LFui7U5mls/CAgALq8BA= Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 06:56:01 +0000 Message-ID: References: <01e401cea1bc$ee444c20$cacce460$@olddog.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <01e401cea1bc$ee444c20$cacce460$@olddog.co.uk> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.149] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: Re: [Pce] NAPTR vs S-NAPTR in draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 06:56:23 -0000 Hi,Dan: Thank for your comments, see my reply inline below. Regards! -Qin -----Original Message----- From: Daniel King [mailto:daniel@olddog.co.uk]=20 Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:00 AM To: Qin Wu; pce@ietf.org Cc: Dhruv Dhody; 'Diego R. Lopez' Subject: RE: NAPTR vs S-NAPTR in draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02 Hi Qin,=20 Thanks for further educating the PCE WG on the protocol mechanics of DNS :-= ) Two scenarios where S-NATPR may provide to be the better mechanism, assumin= g we need service capability query/discovery in the future. This capability discovery could be: 1. When a PCC needs to discover a H-PCE Parent PCE.=20 2. When a PCC needs to discover a PCE for specific capability, stateful, GCO, P2MP, etc. In each scenario the PCC would be able to discover required capability, as each query using DNS S-NATPR would provide a response that includes: Service-tag (pce) Protocol (tcp) Application (gco) This might be represented as "pce:tcp+gco"(?),=20 [Qin]: Following example described in the section 5.1 of RFC6408, it is bet= ter to represent it as "pce+gco:tcp" the resolution process provided by S-NAPTR DDDS [RFC3958] would allow the matching SRV or A recor= d of a suitable PCE.=20 Actually, this type of method and capability exposes some issues. How do we enforce policy with S-NAPTR and make sure a PCE is allowed to provide path computation response, or the PCC is even allowed to send a path computation request.=20 [Qin]: How S-NAPTR has to do with policy enforcement is not clear to me. It seems to me the job of S-NAPTR is tolook up the PCE server's name using = the DNS to get an IP address associated with the name. It then begins a connection to a part= icular port=20 at that address, and sends an initial message to the PCE server. I am not sure S-NAPTR should also take care the subsequence PCEP communicat= ion. However your comment do point toward one thing, i.e., how to deal with fail= ing to connect to PCE server. NAPTR allow using another IP address as connection address to re-connect to= PCE server if the "A" or "AAAA"=20 lookups returned more than one IP address. For authorization, CA and TLS may provide a solution.=20 [Qin]: For authorization, I think we are using DNSSEC. DNSSEC can be used t= o protect=20 domain name or certificate association obtained from DNS server. S-NAPTR allow us choose other transport than TCP,i.e., TLS/TCP if TLS/TCP t= ransport can be supported. Br, Dan.=20 -----Original Message----- From: Qin Wu [mailto:bill.wu@huawei.com]=20 Sent: 23 August 2013 10:58 To: pce@ietf.org Cc: Dhruv Dhody; Daniel King; Diego R. Lopez Subject: NAPTR vs S-NAPTR in draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02 Hi,folks: In the current DNS based PCE discovery draft, we use NAPTR to lookup PCE service and query SRV record and AAA record for a DNS domain name. In the draft, we only uses NAPTR flags 'a','s', "replacement expression", "regular expression" is not used. The S-NAPTR procedure i.e., the "Straightforward-NAPTR" procedure, is defined in IETF RFC 3958 and describes a Dynamic Delegation Discovery Syste= m (DDDS) application procedures on how to resolve a domain name, application service name, and application protocol dynamically to target server and port by using both NAPTR and SRV resource records. The S-NAPTR simplifies the use of NAPTR by limiting the NAPTR flags only to "a", "s" and "". Comparing with using NAPTR, S-NAPTR requires only a subset of NAPTR strictl= y bound to domain names, without making use of the REGEXP field of NAPTR and make client resolution process much more predictable and efficient since multiple levels of redirection by using the "" flag and REGEXP field may lead to a deep chaining of resource records over time in the DNS configuration. In addition, some sadi that S-NATPR enables DNS lookup of services by using resource names while NAPTR by domain name, when using resource name We don'= t need to follow domain name syntax. Therefore I think using resource name is more flexible than using domain name and it is better for this draft to base on S-NAPTR specification [RFC3958] instead of following NAPTR defined in RFC3403. Any comments or opinions? Regards! -Qin -----Original Message----- From: i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 3:18 PM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. Title : Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery using Domain Name System(DNS) Author(s) : Qin Wu Dhruv Dhody Daniel King Diego R. Lopez Filename : draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02.txt Pages : 18 Date : 2013-08-11 Abstract: Discovery of the Path Computation Element (PCE) within an IGP area or routing domain is possible using OSPF [RFC5088] and IS-IS [RFC5089]. However, in some deployment scenarios PCEs may not wish, or be able, to participate within the IGP process, therefore it would be beneficial for the Path Computation Client (PCC) (or other PCEs) to discover PCEs via an alternative mechanism to those proposed in [RFC5088] and [RFC5089]. This document specifies the requirements, use cases, procedures and extensions to support discovery via DNS for PCE. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submissio= n until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce mailing list I-D-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt From julien.meuric@orange.com Tue Aug 27 02:54:21 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F2D21F925A for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 02:54:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.751 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-10.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, URIBL_SBL=20] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yar5U0GAvsWU for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 02:54:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p-mail2.rd.orange.com (p-mail2.rd.orange.com [195.101.245.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1601921F9223 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 02:54:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p-mail2.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 4491CE30115 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:55:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.46]) by p-mail2.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA69E30112 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:55:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.44]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:54:15 +0200 Received: from [10.193.71.94] ([10.193.71.94]) by ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:54:15 +0200 Message-ID: <521C7746.6090008@orange.com> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:54:14 +0200 From: Julien Meuric Organization: Orange User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "pce@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Aug 2013 09:54:15.0249 (UTC) FILETIME=[63ABBC10:01CEA30B] Subject: [Pce] MPLS/SDN 2013 Program Information X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 09:54:21 -0000 The MPLS/SDN 2013 Conference (the 16th annual event) program is now posted and is available at www.mpls2013.com, or specifically Tutorials (Sun): http://www.isocore.com/mpls2013/program/tutorials.htm Technical sessions (Mon-Wed): http://www.isocore.com/mpls2013/program/technical_sessions.htm The conference will take place November 17-20 in Washington DC and will include an extensive four day program consisting of tutorials, technical sessions, panels, and exhibits. The key topics to be discussed at this year's conference include: Virtualization, SDN, Cloud and Data Centers, Mobility and SDN, PCE, Traffic Engineering and Emerging Technologies, Transport SDN, Orchestration, and emerging multi-play applications across common infrastructure. The conference hotel is the Marriott Wardman Park in Washington DC. Please note that there are only a limited number of rooms available this year at a reduced rate. Please make reservations at: https://resweb.passkey.com/Resweb.do?mode=welcome_ei_new&eventID=10583503&utm_source=1786&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=23303762