From nobody Mon Jan 5 01:57:09 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF5D1A3B9D for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 01:57:07 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.6 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MANGLED_TRNFER=2.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q2d698rDC9e9 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 01:57:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias245.francetelecom.com [80.12.204.245]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E4611A1BB8 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 01:57:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from omfeda06.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.199]) by omfeda09.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 7FC62C01A4 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:56:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from Exchangemail-eme1.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.1.186]) by omfeda06.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 6A226C805D for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:56:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.193.71.211] (10.197.38.2) by PEXCVZYH01.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.114.1.186) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.210.2; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:56:56 +0100 Message-ID: <16310_1420451816_54AA5FE8_16310_15020_3_54AA5FE7.7010407@orange.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:56:55 +0100 From: Organization: Orange User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "pce@ietf.org" References: <20141224045851.4F85918123F@rfc-editor.org> In-Reply-To: <20141224045851.4F85918123F@rfc-editor.org> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20141224045851.4F85918123F@rfc-editor.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.197.38.2] X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2014.12.22.201820 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/3-2xLVTxVVJdFlVCOQSUznnWeJI Subject: [Pce] Fwd: RFC 7405 on Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 09:57:07 -0000 FYI -------- Message transféré -------- Date : Tue, 23 Dec 2014 20:58:51 -0800 De : rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 7405 Title: Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF Author: P. Kyzivat Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: December 2014 Mailbox: pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu Pages: 4 Characters: 6668 Updates: RFC5234 I-D Tag: draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7405.txt This document extends the base definition of ABNF (Augmented Backus-Naur Form) to include a way to specify US-ASCII string literals that are matched in a case-sensitive manner. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. From nobody Tue Jan 6 01:10:14 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9911A912B for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 01:09:41 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.497 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, J_CHICKENPOX_27=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gg2bEeLer7Il for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 01:09:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from tama50.ecl.ntt.co.jp (tama50.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.39.147]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048E21A1EEE for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 01:09:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp (vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.86.154]) by tama50.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t0699dVa001346 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 18:09:39 +0900 Received: from vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226CB5F594 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 18:09:39 +0900 (JST) Received: from imail1.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp (imail1.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.5.246]) by vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158C85F588 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 18:09:39 +0900 (JST) Received: from [129.60.21.195] (neba-hp-shiomoto.silab.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.21.195]) by imail1.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t0699dqx010388 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 18:09:39 +0900 Message-ID: <54ABA709.7010400@lab.ntt.co.jp> Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 18:12:41 +0900 From: Kohei Shiomoto User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pce@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/pvheCNOSkGlWwyvXOJNioU05W7E Subject: [Pce] Call for Presentation: iPOP 2015 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 09:09:42 -0000 [Apologies, if you receive multiple copies of this CFP] --------------------------------------- Call for Presentation 11th International Conference on IP + Optical Network (iPOP 2015) April 20-22, 2015 Okinawa Jichikaikan, Naha Okinawa Japan http://www.pilab.jp/ipop2015/ Important Dates: Submission deadline of one-page abstract: January 16, 2015 Notification of acceptance: February 23, 2015 Submission deadline of final presentation slides: March 13, 2015 Following the successful events of iPOP, the 11th Conference on IP+Optical Network (iPOP 2015) will be held at Okinawa Jichikaikan, Naha Okinawa Japan, April 20-22, 2015. The conference has been provided opportunities for both of the industry and the academia to share their knowledge, new findings, and experiences on the state-of-the-art IP and optical networking technologies for these ten years. The Technical Program Committee for iPOP 2015 is soliciting presentation proposals for this conference. Architecture and protocol designs, experiments/PoCs/field trials, theories/algorithms, implementations, and operational experiences are solicited. The topics of the conference will include but not be limited to the following: * Control plane (MPLS/GMPLS, OpenFlow, etc) * SDN for packet and optical transport networks * MLN (Multi-Layer Network), MRN (Multi-Region Network) * TE (Traffic Engineering), PCE (Path Computation Element) * Network abstraction/virtualization * Flex-grid, elastic optical networks * Optical networking/switching for cloud services * Data center and WAN orchestration * Carrier Ethernet and MPLS-TP for backhauling * Service function chaining for mobile networks * Security * QoS (Quality of Service)/QoE (Quality of Experience) * Network operation and management * Standardization/interoperability * Open Source Software (OSS) for SDN/NFV * DevOps Submit an extended abstract (400 words, 1 page), including figures and diagrams, speaker’s name, affiliation, and contact information, to the Technical Program Committee: ipop2015-cfp@pilab.jp. Please see http://www.pilab.jp/ipop2015/ for more details. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Kohei Shiomoto, Ph.D Senior Manager, Communication Traffic & Service Quality Project NTT Network Technology Laboratories NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION TEL +81-422-59-4402 FAX +81-422-59-6364 From nobody Tue Jan 6 20:17:10 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89421A0217 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 20:17:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NRzg8uO4cata for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 20:17:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F87E1A0673 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 20:17:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BNQ84960; Wed, 07 Jan 2015 04:16:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from BLREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.20.4.43) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 04:16:57 +0000 Received: from BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.114]) by BLREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.20.4.43]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 09:46:46 +0530 From: Dhruv Dhody To: "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Next Steps for IRO, Domain-Seq documents... Thread-Index: AdAqML2vlVz1JndqSB+Psqd0gj6Puw== Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 04:16:45 +0000 Message-ID: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B870214AC@BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.18.146.248] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/B41-7nteBVM02I85Mds4SFT5LG0 Cc: JP Vasseur Subject: [Pce] Next Steps for IRO, Domain-Seq documents... X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 04:17:05 -0000 Hi All, Happy New Year!=20 Let's start with some questions to the WG and Chairs.=20 1. IRO-Survey (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-iro-survey/) Should this informational survey be adopted and moved towards RFC? Or just dropped... 2. IRO-Update (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-iro-update/) WG Adoption Call? A simple I-D, should be fast tracked?=20 Other WG documents in PCE, TEAS are dependent on it.=20 3. Domain-Sequence (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-dom= ain-sequence/) Wenhu asked WG about the track of the document, What is the WG opinion= ? Does it needs to be on standards track? =20 Ready to be moved along towards publication... Please provide your suggestions on progressing these documents...=20 Regards, Dhruv (on behalf of co-authors) From nobody Wed Jan 7 06:36:20 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5700C1A9079 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 06:36:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QrEN-QVtOQVN for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 06:36:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias243.francetelecom.com [80.12.204.243]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9051A1A907A for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 06:36:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from omfeda05.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.198]) by omfeda09.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 072D1C0F1A for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 15:36:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from Exchangemail-eme1.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.1.186]) by omfeda05.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id D325B18004F for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 15:36:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.193.71.211] (10.197.38.4) by PEXCVZYH01.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.114.1.186) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 15:36:06 +0100 Message-ID: <28823_1420641366_54AD4456_28823_7989_1_54AD4455.7070603@orange.com> Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 15:36:05 +0100 From: Organization: Orange User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <12631_1417454286_547CA2CE_12631_12333_1_547CA2CA.1050804@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <12631_1417454286_547CA2CE_12631_12333_1_547CA2CA.1050804@orange.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.197.38.4] X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2014.12.22.190922 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/2nXdUyt8WUSkRF_LGl22p3N0BJ4 Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-02 and draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-01 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 14:36:17 -0000 Hi all. This double LC ended 2 weeks ago. Let us thank the reviewers for their feedbacks. Authors, please address the received comments and consider updating your I-D so as to move forward. Thanks, JP & Julien Dec. 01, 2014 - julien.meuric@orange.com: > Dear all, > > As planned, this message ignites a 3-week WG Last Call on both > draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-02 and > draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-01. It will end on Monday > December 22 at 11:59 PM, HST. > > Please send your comments to the PCE mailing list. > > Thanks, > > JP & Julien _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. From nobody Wed Jan 7 17:48:00 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BBDE1AC3F0; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 17:47:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dcvXqN5iHzeH; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 17:47:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777DD1AC3E6; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 17:47:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.10.0.p6 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150108014754.12693.72404.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 17:47:54 -0800 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/IIvw_TCEf0b-mytsxS0_H377_yw Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-02.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 01:47:56 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF. Title : Path Computation Element (PCE) Protocol Extensions for Stateful PCE Usage in GMPLS-controlled Networks Authors : Xian Zhang Young Lee Fatai Zhang Ramon Casellas Oscar Gonzalez de Dios Zafar Ali Filename : draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-02.txt Pages : 15 Date : 2015-01-07 Abstract: The Path Computation Element (PCE) facilitates Traffic Engineering (TE) based path calculation in large, multi-domain, multi-region, or multi-layer networks. [Stateful-PCE] provides the fundamental PCE communication Protocol (PCEP) extensions needed to support stateful PCE functions, without specifying the technology-specific extensions. This memo provides extensions required for PCEP so as to enable the usage of a stateful PCE capability in GMPLS-controlled networks. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Wed Jan 7 17:52:35 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124F01AC3F1 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 17:52:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.761 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.761 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cccRpbcUUf0B for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 17:52:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0908C1A1A4A for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 17:52:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BNS62541; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 01:52:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.72) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 01:52:01 +0000 Received: from SZXEMA512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.43]) by SZXEMA413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.72]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 09:51:58 +0800 From: "Zhangxian (Xian)" To: "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-02.txt Thread-Index: AQHQKuUz4fFFyIf6q0a3iIAGGPtYyJy1dLOQ Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 01:51:58 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.66.104.209] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/j0_jbSIxyww6VY6iNWh_wvKj4BY Subject: [Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-02.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 01:52:34 -0000 SGksIEFsbCwgDQoNCiAgVGhpcyBpcyBqdXN0IHRvIGtlZXAgdGhpcyBkcmFmdCBhbGl2ZSBmb3Ig bm93LiBQbGVhc2UgcmV2aWV3IHRoaXMgZHJhZnQgYW5kIHNoYXJlIHlvdXIgdmlld3BvaW50cyBp ZiB5b3UgYXJlIGludGVyZXN0ZWQgb3IgeW91IGhhdmUgaW1wbGVtZW50ZWQgc29tZSBvZiB0aGUg ZmVhdHVyZXMgbWVudGlvbmVkIGluIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQuDQoNCkNoZWVycywNClhpYW4NCg0KLS0t LS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206IFBjZSBbbWFpbHRvOnBjZS1ib3VuY2VzQGll dGYub3JnXSBPbiBCZWhhbGYgT2YgaW50ZXJuZXQtZHJhZnRzQGlldGYub3JnDQpTZW50OiAyMDE1 xOox1MI4yNUgOTo0OA0KVG86IGktZC1hbm5vdW5jZUBpZXRmLm9yZw0KQ2M6IHBjZUBpZXRmLm9y Zw0KU3ViamVjdDogW1BjZV0gSS1EIEFjdGlvbjogZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1wY2UtcGNlcC1zdGF0ZWZ1 bC1wY2UtZ21wbHMtMDIudHh0DQoNCg0KQSBOZXcgSW50ZXJuZXQtRHJhZnQgaXMgYXZhaWxhYmxl IGZyb20gdGhlIG9uLWxpbmUgSW50ZXJuZXQtRHJhZnRzIGRpcmVjdG9yaWVzLg0KIFRoaXMgZHJh ZnQgaXMgYSB3b3JrIGl0ZW0gb2YgdGhlIFBhdGggQ29tcHV0YXRpb24gRWxlbWVudCBXb3JraW5n IEdyb3VwIG9mIHRoZSBJRVRGLg0KDQogICAgICAgIFRpdGxlICAgICAgICAgICA6IFBhdGggQ29t cHV0YXRpb24gRWxlbWVudCAoUENFKSBQcm90b2NvbCBFeHRlbnNpb25zIGZvciBTdGF0ZWZ1bCBQ Q0UgVXNhZ2UgaW4gR01QTFMtY29udHJvbGxlZCBOZXR3b3Jrcw0KICAgICAgICBBdXRob3JzICAg ICAgICAgOiBYaWFuIFpoYW5nDQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIFlvdW5nIExlZQ0K ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBGYXRhaSBaaGFuZw0KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICBSYW1vbiBDYXNlbGxhcw0KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBPc2NhciBH b256YWxleiBkZSBEaW9zDQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIFphZmFyIEFsaQ0KCUZp bGVuYW1lICAgICAgICA6IGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtcGNlLXBjZXAtc3RhdGVmdWwtcGNlLWdtcGxzLTAy LnR4dA0KCVBhZ2VzICAgICAgICAgICA6IDE1DQoJRGF0ZSAgICAgICAgICAgIDogMjAxNS0wMS0w Nw0KDQpBYnN0cmFjdDoNCiAgIFRoZSBQYXRoIENvbXB1dGF0aW9uIEVsZW1lbnQgKFBDRSkgZmFj aWxpdGF0ZXMgVHJhZmZpYyBFbmdpbmVlcmluZw0KICAgKFRFKSBiYXNlZCBwYXRoIGNhbGN1bGF0 aW9uIGluIGxhcmdlLCBtdWx0aS1kb21haW4sIG11bHRpLXJlZ2lvbiwgb3INCiAgIG11bHRpLWxh eWVyIG5ldHdvcmtzLiBbU3RhdGVmdWwtUENFXSBwcm92aWRlcyB0aGUgZnVuZGFtZW50YWwgUENF DQogICBjb21tdW5pY2F0aW9uIFByb3RvY29sIChQQ0VQKSBleHRlbnNpb25zIG5lZWRlZCB0byBz dXBwb3J0IHN0YXRlZnVsDQogICBQQ0UgZnVuY3Rpb25zLCB3aXRob3V0IHNwZWNpZnlpbmcgdGhl IHRlY2hub2xvZ3ktc3BlY2lmaWMgZXh0ZW5zaW9ucy4NCiAgIFRoaXMgbWVtbyBwcm92aWRlcyBl eHRlbnNpb25zIHJlcXVpcmVkIGZvciBQQ0VQIHNvIGFzIHRvIGVuYWJsZSB0aGUNCiAgIHVzYWdl IG9mIGEgc3RhdGVmdWwgUENFIGNhcGFiaWxpdHkgaW4gR01QTFMtY29udHJvbGxlZCBuZXR3b3Jr cy4NCg0KDQpUaGUgSUVURiBkYXRhdHJhY2tlciBzdGF0dXMgcGFnZSBmb3IgdGhpcyBkcmFmdCBp czoNCmh0dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvZG9jL2RyYWZ0LWlldGYtcGNlLXBjZXAt c3RhdGVmdWwtcGNlLWdtcGxzLw0KDQpUaGVyZSdzIGFsc28gYSBodG1saXplZCB2ZXJzaW9uIGF2 YWlsYWJsZSBhdDoNCmh0dHA6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWlldGYtcGNlLXBj ZXAtc3RhdGVmdWwtcGNlLWdtcGxzLTAyDQoNCkEgZGlmZiBmcm9tIHRoZSBwcmV2aW91cyB2ZXJz aW9uIGlzIGF2YWlsYWJsZSBhdDoNCmh0dHA6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvcmZjZGlmZj91cmwyPWRy YWZ0LWlldGYtcGNlLXBjZXAtc3RhdGVmdWwtcGNlLWdtcGxzLTAyDQoNCg0KUGxlYXNlIG5vdGUg dGhhdCBpdCBtYXkgdGFrZSBhIGNvdXBsZSBvZiBtaW51dGVzIGZyb20gdGhlIHRpbWUgb2Ygc3Vi bWlzc2lvbg0KdW50aWwgdGhlIGh0bWxpemVkIHZlcnNpb24gYW5kIGRpZmYgYXJlIGF2YWlsYWJs ZSBhdCB0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy4NCg0KSW50ZXJuZXQtRHJhZnRzIGFyZSBhbHNvIGF2YWlsYWJs ZSBieSBhbm9ueW1vdXMgRlRQIGF0Og0KZnRwOi8vZnRwLmlldGYub3JnL2ludGVybmV0LWRyYWZ0 cy8NCg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NClBj ZSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNClBjZUBpZXRmLm9yZw0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1h bi9saXN0aW5mby9wY2UNCg== From nobody Mon Jan 12 03:40:37 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D921A8AF6 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:40:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g5swYf0nb_b0 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:40:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias245.francetelecom.com [80.12.204.245]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8522C1A8AF4 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:40:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from omfeda07.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.200]) by omfeda09.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 0124AC09FD; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:40:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from Exchangemail-eme1.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.1.186]) by omfeda07.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id CF97015808E; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:40:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.193.71.211] (10.197.38.2) by PEXCVZYH01.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.114.1.186) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:40:30 +0100 Message-ID: <29817_1421062830_54B3B2AE_29817_2225_1_54B3B2AD.5020208@orange.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:40:29 +0100 From: Organization: Orange User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dhruv Dhody References: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B870214AC@BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B870214AC@BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.197.38.2] X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2014.12.22.200030 Archived-At: Cc: "pce@ietf.org" , JP Vasseur Subject: Re: [Pce] Next Steps for IRO, Domain-Seq documents... X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:40:35 -0000 Hi Dhruv. Please see inline... Julien Jan. 07, 2015 - Dhruv Dhody: > Hi All, > > Happy New Year! > > Let's start with some questions to the WG and Chairs. > > 1. IRO-Survey (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-iro-survey/) > Should this informational survey be adopted and moved towards RFC? > Or just dropped... [JM] This was preliminary and necessary work for the following I-D. Not sure the overhead from authors/chairs/shepherds to reach RFC is required, but if the WG thinks otherwise, we may consider it. > > 2. IRO-Update (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-iro-update/) > WG Adoption Call? > A simple I-D, should be fast tracked? > Other WG documents in PCE, TEAS are dependent on it. [JM] This is the significant output of the above. We will proceed accordingly. > > 3. Domain-Sequence (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence/) > Wenhu asked WG about the track of the document, What is the WG opinion? Does it needs to be on standards track? > Ready to be moved along towards publication... [JM] Here, we really need to hear the WG's opinion. It is not too late to change (again), but we need to see more views about this before moving again. > > Please provide your suggestions on progressing these documents... > > Regards, > Dhruv (on behalf of co-authors) > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. From nobody Mon Jan 12 03:43:57 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24A41A8AFA for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:43:55 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JVPtPMs9dbkg for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:43:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias92.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDBBD1A8AF9 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:43:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from omfedm06.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.2]) by omfedm12.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 0A45018C239 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:43:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from Exchangemail-eme1.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.1.186]) by omfedm06.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id E633927C084 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:43:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.193.71.211] (10.197.38.4) by PEXCVZYH01.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.114.1.186) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:43:51 +0100 Message-ID: <30282_1421063031_54B3B377_30282_3283_1_54B3B377.3060306@orange.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:43:51 +0100 From: Organization: Orange User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "pce@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.197.38.4] X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2014.12.22.202419 Archived-At: Subject: [Pce] Poll on draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:43:55 -0000 Dear PCE WG, Following our previous discussions on IRO within PCEP, do you agree with the adoption of draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 as a PCE WG I-D? Please share your comments using the mailing list, justifying as much as possible in case you are opposed. Thanks, JP & Julien _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. From nobody Mon Jan 12 09:03:05 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08141ACCE7 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:03:01 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Echic4ua-Sn5 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:02:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ie0-x229.google.com (mail-ie0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 316C41AC3CF for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:02:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id y20so26346080ier.0 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:02:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dMdKZ4PgXK8JmeiiP5HTHx4wH9PZ+3JEb6YcO7O8v7c=; b=BPgrWNKD2liVUOORWp1VYhUym3tDxLdyHKaq3gPeI8ZZ7osW3lnLx5G49OH67JxWcA 6L5wvTHlUEMEb4ffcuNlUzJKeQL4ArJoekhLx3giy7+bCWjqocewBUYiiK8f5kWq9EO1 eTezXhads5pfaJyYMTsjjDStGzEEGHiWyUbu8ZoBK0Q7cJb4Zp53gUQs/5aLXbos9i7w 2frNT47V8qsvK0VbIhhtCL9XTKNs9ED6gMJO8U09o/8VuFbQ9r8vut/uJUUJ+uOrGlIL du9rCJySq9HnJz7b2U2MjkFOXEbpaEiNpFAhTNg7YiTU2qlLIf5qzV1v3jfcU4rbjKwc a8Mw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.107.7 with SMTP id gy7mr16030060igb.49.1421082178406; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:02:58 -0800 (PST) Sender: dhruvdhody@gmail.com X-Google-Sender-Delegation: dhruvdhody@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.154.68 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:02:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <30282_1421063031_54B3B377_30282_3283_1_54B3B377.3060306@orange.com> References: <30282_1421063031_54B3B377_30282_3283_1_54B3B377.3060306@orange.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:32:58 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: LjHZFz2eA3scB_6M4sLCPsw8Gwc Message-ID: From: Dhruv Dhody To: Julien Meuric Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Archived-At: Cc: "pce@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll on draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:03:02 -0000 Stating the obvious... support! Regards, Dhruv (Author) On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 5:13 PM, wrote: > Dear PCE WG, > > Following our previous discussions on IRO within PCEP, do you agree with the > adoption of draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 as a PCE WG I-D? Please share your > comments using the mailing list, justifying as much as possible in case you > are opposed. > > Thanks, > > JP & Julien > > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu > ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and > delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From nobody Mon Jan 12 09:10:35 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D2A1ACD02 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:10:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0me_iiHCEATp for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:10:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE9E11AC3EE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:10:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BNW42677; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:10:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.212.94.49) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:10:28 +0000 Received: from SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.253]) by SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.204]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:10:22 -0800 From: Huaimo Chen To: "julien.meuric@orange.com" , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll on draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 Thread-Index: AQHQLl0WqvPxegFNpUKjsjoOvEbfmZy8t5uw Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:10:21 +0000 Message-ID: <5316A0AB3C851246A7CA5758973207D445CDCB09@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com> References: <30282_1421063031_54B3B377_30282_3283_1_54B3B377.3060306@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <30282_1421063031_54B3B377_30282_3283_1_54B3B377.3060306@orange.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.212.244.205] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll on draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:10:34 -0000 Support. Best Regards, Huaimo -----Original Message----- From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meuric@orange.c= om Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 6:44 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll on draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 Dear PCE WG, Following our previous discussions on IRO within PCEP, do you agree with th= e adoption of draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 as a PCE WG I-D? Please share y= our comments using the mailing list, justifying as much as possible in case= you are opposed. Thanks, JP & Julien ___________________________________________________________________________= ______________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confiden= tielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou = copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez= le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Le= s messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline to= ute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged inf= ormation that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used= or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and dele= te this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been = modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From nobody Mon Jan 12 09:47:48 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA6F1AC3F6 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:47:47 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QPU9iSDJKpND for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:47:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DDD01ACD18 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:47:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BNW45048; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:47:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from DFWEML704-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.141) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:45:25 +0000 Received: from DFWEML706-CHM.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.225]) by dfweml704-chm ([10.193.5.141]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:45:13 -0800 From: Leeyoung To: "julien.meuric@orange.com" , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll on draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 Thread-Index: AQHQLl0U6TugSKUVHUKuDYsxJ8rNKJy8wkRw Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:45:13 +0000 Message-ID: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E1729C7108A@dfweml706-chm> References: <30282_1421063031_54B3B377_30282_3283_1_54B3B377.3060306@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <30282_1421063031_54B3B377_30282_3283_1_54B3B377.3060306@orange.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.192.11.120] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll on draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:47:47 -0000 Support. Young -----Original Message----- From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meuric@orange.c= om Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 5:44 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll on draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 Dear PCE WG, Following our previous discussions on IRO within PCEP, do you agree with=20 the adoption of draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 as a PCE WG I-D? Please=20 share your comments using the mailing list, justifying as much as=20 possible in case you are opposed. Thanks, JP & Julien ___________________________________________________________________________= ______________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confiden= tielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu= ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages el= ectroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou = falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged inf= ormation that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and dele= te this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been = modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From nobody Mon Jan 12 12:01:27 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB891ACDF7; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:01:18 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jFDCfb6nMta9; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:01:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE4E1ACE06; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:00:51 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.10.0.p8 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150112200051.6283.58666.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:00:51 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: pce mailing list , pce chair , RFC Editor Subject: [Pce] Protocol Action: 'Conveying Vendor-Specific Constraints in the Path Computation Element communication Protocol' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-pce-rfc7150bis-01.txt) X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:01:19 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Conveying Vendor-Specific Constraints in the Path Computation Element communication Protocol' (draft-ietf-pce-rfc7150bis-01.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Path Computation Element Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Alia Atlas and Adrian Farrel. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-rfc7150bis/ Technical Summary The Path Computation Element communication Protocol (PCEP) is used to convey path computation requests and responses both between Path Computation Clients (PCCs) and Path Computation Elements (PCEs) and between cooperating PCEs. In PCEP, the path computation requests carry details of the constraints and objective functions that the PCC wishes the PCE to apply in its computation. This document defines a facility to carry vendor-specific information in PCEP using a dedicated object and a new Type-Length-Value (TLV) that can be carried in any PCEP object that supports TLVs. This document obsoletes RFC 7150. The only changes from that document are a clarification of the use of the new Type-Length-Value and the allocation of a different code point for the VENDOR- INFORMATION object. Working Group Summary This bis versions became necessary because of an inadvertant clash with codepoints used in another Internet-Draft that had been deployed without IANA allocation. The PCE working group has conducted a survey of implementations and deployments of RFC 7150 and considers that this change is safe and does not harm early implementers of RFC 7150. Document Quality Some implementations claim to use the extensions defined in the I-D. The original RFC 7150 already passed IESG review. Personnel Who is the Document Shepherd? Julien Meuric Who is the Responsible Area Director? Alia Atlas From nobody Mon Jan 12 19:39:22 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3611A8A03 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:39:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.761 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.761 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jqNdfxJe8AB2 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:39:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9125D1A8A01 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:39:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BNW74416; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 03:39:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.72) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 03:39:15 +0000 Received: from SZXEMA512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.43]) by SZXEMA413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.72]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 11:39:07 +0800 From: "Zhangxian (Xian)" To: "julien.meuric@orange.com" , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll on draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 Thread-Index: AQHQLl0UBGDDKuAWX0i8ZdGLZHxqfJy9MvaA Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 03:39:07 +0000 Message-ID: References: <30282_1421063031_54B3B377_30282_3283_1_54B3B377.3060306@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <30282_1421063031_54B3B377_30282_3283_1_54B3B377.3060306@orange.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.66.104.209] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll on draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 03:39:20 -0000 U3VwcG9ydC4NCg0KQSB2ZXJ5IHN0cmFpZ2h0Zm9yd2FyZCBkcmFmdCwganVzdCBvbmUgc3VnZ2Vz dGlvbjoNCg0KU2hvdWxkIHRoZSBsYXN0IHBhcmFncmFwaCBvZiBTZWN0aW9uIDIgYmUgd3JpdHRl biBpbiBSRkMyMTE5IGxhbmd1YWdlPyBJIG5vdGljZSB0aGUgZmlyc3Qgc2VudGVuY2UgaW4gdGhp cyBzZWN0aW9uIHVzZXMgTVVTVCBmb3IgcHJvdmlkaW5nIGJhY2tncm91bmQgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24u IE90aGVyIHRoYW4gdGhhdCwgbm8gUkZDMjExOSBsYW5ndWFnZSBpcyB1c2VkLiANCg0KUmVnYXJk cywNClhpYW4NCg0KLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206IFBjZSBbbWFpbHRv OnBjZS1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXSBPbiBCZWhhbGYgT2YganVsaWVuLm1ldXJpY0BvcmFuZ2Uu Y29tDQpTZW50OiAyMDE1xOox1MIxMsjVIDE5OjQ0DQpUbzogcGNlQGlldGYub3JnDQpTdWJqZWN0 OiBbUGNlXSBQb2xsIG9uIGRyYWZ0LWRob2R5LXBjZS1pcm8tdXBkYXRlLTAyDQoNCkRlYXIgUENF IFdHLA0KDQpGb2xsb3dpbmcgb3VyIHByZXZpb3VzIGRpc2N1c3Npb25zIG9uIElSTyB3aXRoaW4g UENFUCwgZG8geW91IGFncmVlIHdpdGggDQp0aGUgYWRvcHRpb24gb2YgZHJhZnQtZGhvZHktcGNl LWlyby11cGRhdGUtMDIgYXMgYSBQQ0UgV0cgSS1EPyBQbGVhc2UgDQpzaGFyZSB5b3VyIGNvbW1l bnRzIHVzaW5nIHRoZSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QsIGp1c3RpZnlpbmcgYXMgbXVjaCBhcyANCnBvc3Np YmxlIGluIGNhc2UgeW91IGFyZSBvcHBvc2VkLg0KDQpUaGFua3MsDQoNCkpQICYgSnVsaWVuDQoN Cg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fXw0KDQpDZSBtZXNzYWdlIGV0IHNlcyBwaWVjZXMgam9pbnRlcyBwZXV2ZW50IGNv bnRlbmlyIGRlcyBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbnMgY29uZmlkZW50aWVsbGVzIG91IHByaXZpbGVnaWVlcyBl dCBuZSBkb2l2ZW50IGRvbmMNCnBhcyBldHJlIGRpZmZ1c2VzLCBleHBsb2l0ZXMgb3UgY29waWVz IHNhbnMgYXV0b3Jpc2F0aW9uLiBTaSB2b3VzIGF2ZXogcmVjdSBjZSBtZXNzYWdlIHBhciBlcnJl dXIsIHZldWlsbGV6IGxlIHNpZ25hbGVyDQphIGwnZXhwZWRpdGV1ciBldCBsZSBkZXRydWlyZSBh aW5zaSBxdWUgbGVzIHBpZWNlcyBqb2ludGVzLiBMZXMgbWVzc2FnZXMgZWxlY3Ryb25pcXVlcyBl dGFudCBzdXNjZXB0aWJsZXMgZCdhbHRlcmF0aW9uLA0KT3JhbmdlIGRlY2xpbmUgdG91dGUgcmVz cG9uc2FiaWxpdGUgc2kgY2UgbWVzc2FnZSBhIGV0ZSBhbHRlcmUsIGRlZm9ybWUgb3UgZmFsc2lm aWUuIE1lcmNpLg0KDQpUaGlzIG1lc3NhZ2UgYW5kIGl0cyBhdHRhY2htZW50cyBtYXkgY29udGFp biBjb25maWRlbnRpYWwgb3IgcHJpdmlsZWdlZCBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiB0aGF0IG1heSBiZSBwcm90 ZWN0ZWQgYnkgbGF3Ow0KdGhleSBzaG91bGQgbm90IGJlIGRpc3RyaWJ1dGVkLCB1c2VkIG9yIGNv cGllZCB3aXRob3V0IGF1dGhvcmlzYXRpb24uDQpJZiB5b3UgaGF2ZSByZWNlaXZlZCB0aGlzIGVt YWlsIGluIGVycm9yLCBwbGVhc2Ugbm90aWZ5IHRoZSBzZW5kZXIgYW5kIGRlbGV0ZSB0aGlzIG1l c3NhZ2UgYW5kIGl0cyBhdHRhY2htZW50cy4NCkFzIGVtYWlscyBtYXkgYmUgYWx0ZXJlZCwgT3Jh bmdlIGlzIG5vdCBsaWFibGUgZm9yIG1lc3NhZ2VzIHRoYXQgaGF2ZSBiZWVuIG1vZGlmaWVkLCBj aGFuZ2VkIG9yIGZhbHNpZmllZC4NClRoYW5rIHlvdS4NCg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NClBjZSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNClBjZUBpZXRmLm9y Zw0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9wY2UNCg== From nobody Mon Jan 12 20:19:36 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D171A8850 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:19:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.761 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.761 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fx24UTGba78x for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:19:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C35B1A1B29 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:19:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BNW77138; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 04:19:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from BLREML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.20.4.47) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 04:19:15 +0000 Received: from BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.114]) by BLREML408-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.20.4.47]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:49:02 +0530 From: Dhruv Dhody To: "Zhangxian (Xian)" , "julien.meuric@orange.com" , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll on draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 Thread-Index: AQHQLl0UuL9rKoOIU06tWgwfVzrWdpy9DAqAgABj9gA= Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 04:19:01 +0000 Message-ID: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B87027348@BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com> References: <30282_1421063031_54B3B377_30282_3283_1_54B3B377.3060306@orange.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.18.146.248] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll on draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 04:19:22 -0000 SGkgWGlhbiwgDQoNClRoYW5rcyBmb3IgeW91ciBzdXBwb3J0IGFuZCBzdWdnZXN0aW9uLiANCg0K SG93IGFib3V0IHRoZXNlIGNoYW5nZXMgLSANCg0KT0xEOiANCiAgIFRoZSBjb250ZW50IG9mIGFu IElSTyBvYmplY3QgaXMgYW4gb3JkZXJlZCBsaXN0IG9mIHN1Ym9iamVjdHMNCiAgIHJlcHJlc2Vu dGluZyBhIHNlcmllcyBvZiBhYnN0cmFjdCBub2Rlcy4NCk5FVzogDQogICBUaGUgY29udGVudCBv ZiBhbiBJUk8gb2JqZWN0IE1VU1QgYmUgYW4gb3JkZXJlZCBsaXN0IG9mIHN1Ym9iamVjdHMNCiAg IHJlcHJlc2VudGluZyBhIHNlcmllcyBvZiBhYnN0cmFjdCBub2Rlcy4NCg0KT0xEOg0KICAgRnVy dGhlciBlYWNoIHN1Ym9iamVjdCBoYXMgYW4gYXR0cmlidXRlDQogICBjYWxsZWQgJ0wgYml0Jywg d2hpY2ggaXMgc2V0IGlmIHRoZSBzdWJvYmplY3QgcmVwcmVzZW50cyBhIGxvb3NlIGhvcC4NCiAg IElmIHRoZSBiaXQgaXMgbm90IHNldCwgdGhlIHN1Ym9iamVjdCByZXByZXNlbnRzIGEgc3RyaWN0 IGhvcC4gIA0KTkVXOg0KICAgRnVydGhlciwgdGhlIGxvb3NlIG9yIHN0cmljdCBwcm9wZXJ0eSBv ZiB0aGUgc3Vib2JqZWN0IE1VU1QgYmUgDQogICBpbnRlcnByZXRlZCBiYXNlZCBvbiBhbiBhdHRy aWJ1dGUgY2FsbGVkICdMIGJpdCcsIHdoaWNoIGlzIHNldCANCiAgIGlmIHRoZSBzdWJvYmplY3Qg cmVwcmVzZW50cyBhIGxvb3NlIGhvcC4gSWYgdGhlIGJpdCBpcyBub3Qgc2V0LCB0aGUgDQogICBz dWJvYmplY3QgcmVwcmVzZW50cyBhIHN0cmljdCBob3AuICANCg0KUmVnYXJkcywNCkRocnV2DQoN Cj4gLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCj4gRnJvbTogUGNlIFttYWlsdG86cGNlLWJv dW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmddIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiBaaGFuZ3hpYW4gKFhpYW4pDQo+IFNlbnQ6IDEz IEphbnVhcnkgMjAxNSAwOTowOQ0KPiBUbzoganVsaWVuLm1ldXJpY0BvcmFuZ2UuY29tOyBwY2VA aWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4gU3ViamVjdDogUmU6IFtQY2VdIFBvbGwgb24gZHJhZnQtZGhvZHktcGNlLWly by11cGRhdGUtMDINCj4gDQo+IFN1cHBvcnQuDQo+IA0KPiBBIHZlcnkgc3RyYWlnaHRmb3J3YXJk IGRyYWZ0LCBqdXN0IG9uZSBzdWdnZXN0aW9uOg0KPiANCj4gU2hvdWxkIHRoZSBsYXN0IHBhcmFn cmFwaCBvZiBTZWN0aW9uIDIgYmUgd3JpdHRlbiBpbiBSRkMyMTE5IGxhbmd1YWdlPw0KPiBJIG5v dGljZSB0aGUgZmlyc3Qgc2VudGVuY2UgaW4gdGhpcyBzZWN0aW9uIHVzZXMgTVVTVCBmb3IgcHJv dmlkaW5nDQo+IGJhY2tncm91bmQgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24uIE90aGVyIHRoYW4gdGhhdCwgbm8gUkZD MjExOSBsYW5ndWFnZSBpcyB1c2VkLg0KPiANCj4gUmVnYXJkcywNCj4gWGlhbg0KPiANCj4gLS0t LS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCj4gRnJvbTogUGNlIFttYWlsdG86cGNlLWJvdW5jZXNA aWV0Zi5vcmddIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZg0KPiBqdWxpZW4ubWV1cmljQG9yYW5nZS5jb20NCj4gU2Vu dDogMjAxNcTqMdTCMTLI1SAxOTo0NA0KPiBUbzogcGNlQGlldGYub3JnDQo+IFN1YmplY3Q6IFtQ Y2VdIFBvbGwgb24gZHJhZnQtZGhvZHktcGNlLWlyby11cGRhdGUtMDINCj4gDQo+IERlYXIgUENF IFdHLA0KPiANCj4gRm9sbG93aW5nIG91ciBwcmV2aW91cyBkaXNjdXNzaW9ucyBvbiBJUk8gd2l0 aGluIFBDRVAsIGRvIHlvdSBhZ3JlZQ0KPiB3aXRoIHRoZSBhZG9wdGlvbiBvZiBkcmFmdC1kaG9k eS1wY2UtaXJvLXVwZGF0ZS0wMiBhcyBhIFBDRSBXRyBJLUQ/DQo+IFBsZWFzZSBzaGFyZSB5b3Vy IGNvbW1lbnRzIHVzaW5nIHRoZSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QsIGp1c3RpZnlpbmcgYXMgbXVjaA0KPiBh cyBwb3NzaWJsZSBpbiBjYXNlIHlvdSBhcmUgb3Bwb3NlZC4NCj4gDQo+IFRoYW5rcywNCj4gDQo+ IEpQICYgSnVsaWVuDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQo+IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj4gDQo+IENlIG1lc3NhZ2UgZXQg c2VzIHBpZWNlcyBqb2ludGVzIHBldXZlbnQgY29udGVuaXIgZGVzIGluZm9ybWF0aW9ucw0KPiBj b25maWRlbnRpZWxsZXMgb3UgcHJpdmlsZWdpZWVzIGV0IG5lIGRvaXZlbnQgZG9uYyBwYXMgZXRy ZSBkaWZmdXNlcywNCj4gZXhwbG9pdGVzIG91IGNvcGllcyBzYW5zIGF1dG9yaXNhdGlvbi4gU2kg dm91cyBhdmV6IHJlY3UgY2UgbWVzc2FnZQ0KPiBwYXIgZXJyZXVyLCB2ZXVpbGxleiBsZSBzaWdu YWxlciBhIGwnZXhwZWRpdGV1ciBldCBsZSBkZXRydWlyZSBhaW5zaQ0KPiBxdWUgbGVzIHBpZWNl cyBqb2ludGVzLiBMZXMgbWVzc2FnZXMgZWxlY3Ryb25pcXVlcyBldGFudCBzdXNjZXB0aWJsZXMN Cj4gZCdhbHRlcmF0aW9uLCBPcmFuZ2UgZGVjbGluZSB0b3V0ZSByZXNwb25zYWJpbGl0ZSBzaSBj ZSBtZXNzYWdlIGEgZXRlDQo+IGFsdGVyZSwgZGVmb3JtZSBvdSBmYWxzaWZpZS4gTWVyY2kuDQo+ IA0KPiBUaGlzIG1lc3NhZ2UgYW5kIGl0cyBhdHRhY2htZW50cyBtYXkgY29udGFpbiBjb25maWRl bnRpYWwgb3INCj4gcHJpdmlsZWdlZCBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiB0aGF0IG1heSBiZSBwcm90ZWN0ZWQg YnkgbGF3OyB0aGV5IHNob3VsZCBub3QNCj4gYmUgZGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQsIHVzZWQgb3IgY29waWVk IHdpdGhvdXQgYXV0aG9yaXNhdGlvbi4NCj4gSWYgeW91IGhhdmUgcmVjZWl2ZWQgdGhpcyBlbWFp bCBpbiBlcnJvciwgcGxlYXNlIG5vdGlmeSB0aGUgc2VuZGVyDQo+IGFuZCBkZWxldGUgdGhpcyBt ZXNzYWdlIGFuZCBpdHMgYXR0YWNobWVudHMuDQo+IEFzIGVtYWlscyBtYXkgYmUgYWx0ZXJlZCwg T3JhbmdlIGlzIG5vdCBsaWFibGUgZm9yIG1lc3NhZ2VzIHRoYXQgaGF2ZQ0KPiBiZWVuIG1vZGlm aWVkLCBjaGFuZ2VkIG9yIGZhbHNpZmllZC4NCj4gVGhhbmsgeW91Lg0KPiANCj4gX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj4gUGNlIG1haWxpbmcgbGlz dA0KPiBQY2VAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4gaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5m by9wY2UNCj4gX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18N Cj4gUGNlIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KPiBQY2VAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4gaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5v cmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9wY2UNCg== From nobody Tue Jan 13 00:07:40 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA95B1A8A41 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:07:36 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2TzhREwI_odv for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:07:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FF891A8A3F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:07:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BRE23544; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 08:07:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.33) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 08:07:29 +0000 Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.169]) by nkgeml402-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.33]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:07:17 +0800 From: Qin Wu To: "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Open issue in service segment support draft Thread-Index: AdAvB/HnZiOThLJoRQWZH5JatIhgzw== Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 08:07:16 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.180] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA8469FE53nkgeml501mbschi_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: [Pce] Open issue in service segment support draft X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 08:07:37 -0000 --_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA8469FE53nkgeml501mbschi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, all: One open issue when we discussed draft-dw-pce-service-segment-routing in IETF 91 = meeting is how to support service chain in the segment routing, Rob concern= ed service chaining was not well supported in the current base segment rout= ing draft(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-00). We believe this is true. To address this issue, we propose to remove servic= e chaining or service function related text from draft-dw-pce-service-segme= nt-routing and use service segment to represent specific treatment offered by SR = enabled node(s) in the path, e.g., [I-D.filsfils-spring-segment-routing-use-cases] describes using local servi= ce- Segment to stand for a BGP-VPN service. We like to get people's feeling about this proposal before making update. T= hanks. Regards! -Qin --_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA8469FE53nkgeml501mbschi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi, all:

One open issue when we discusse= d draft-dw-pce-service-= segment-routing in IETF 91 meeting is how to support service cha= in in the segment routing, Rob concerned service chaining was not well supp= orted in the current base segment routing draft(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-00= ).

 

We believe this is true. To address this i=
ssue, we propose to remove service chaining or service function related tex=
t from draft-dw-=
pce-service-segment-routing and use service segment to represent=
 specific treatment offered by SR enabled node(s) in the path, e.g.,
[I-D.filsfils-spring-segment-routing-use-c=
ases] describes using local service- Segment to
stand for a BGP-VPN service.
We like to get people’s feeling abou=
t this proposal before making update. Thanks.
 
Regards!
-Qin

 

--_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA8469FE53nkgeml501mbschi_-- From nobody Tue Jan 13 19:11:43 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71EA1A8994; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:11:41 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2VVwHoFKmIxx; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:11:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8341A89FA; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:11:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.10.0.p8 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150114031139.18401.67036.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:11:39 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-02.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:11:42 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF. Title : Optimizations of Label Switched Path State Synchronization Procedures for a Stateful PCE Authors : Edward Crabbe Ina Minei Jan Medved Robert Varga Xian Zhang Dhruv Dhody Filename : draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-02.txt Pages : 23 Date : 2015-01-13 Abstract: A stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) has access to not only the information disseminated by the network's Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP), but also the set of active paths and their reserved resources for its computation. The additional Label Switched Path (LSP) state information allows the PCE to compute constrained paths while considering individual LSPs and their interactions. This requires a reliable state synchronization mechanism between the PCE and the network, PCE and path computation clients (PCCs), and between cooperating PCEs. The basic mechanism for state synchronization is part of the stateful PCE specification. This draft presents motivations for optimizations to the base state synchronization procedure and specifies the required Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) extensions. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Tue Jan 13 19:20:45 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7051B1ACE6C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:20:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1oumBChzNz9W for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:20:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BCF91B29F3 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:20:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BOA12549; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:20:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from BLREML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.20.4.41) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:20:35 +0000 Received: from BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.114]) by BLREML405-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.20.4.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:50:30 +0530 From: Dhruv Dhody To: "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-02.txt Thread-Index: AQHQL6fZjrNHpFN6T0SdltIDyWtP05y+8Idg Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:20:29 +0000 Message-ID: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B87027C85@BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com> References: <20150114031139.18401.67036.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20150114031139.18401.67036.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.18.146.248] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-02.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:20:42 -0000 Hi PCErs,=20 Here is an update addressing all comments received during WG LC.=20 The main differences are -=20 ~ A separate capability flags for TRIGGERED-INITIAL-SYNC (F) and TRIGGERED-= RESYNC (T) bits ~ Added Manageability Considerations ~ Updated Security Considerations ~ Introduction to all the procedures in section 1 ~ Editorial changes as suggested during the review Please have a look [http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-pce-state= ful-sync-optimizations-02] and let us know if you have any further suggesti= ons.=20 Regards, Dhruv (on behalf of co-authors) > -----Original Message----- > From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet- > drafts@ietf.org > Sent: 14 January 2015 08:42 > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > Cc: pce@ietf.org > Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync- > optimizations-02.txt >=20 >=20 > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working > Group of the IETF. >=20 > Title : Optimizations of Label Switched Path State > Synchronization Procedures for a Stateful PCE > Authors : Edward Crabbe > Ina Minei > Jan Medved > Robert Varga > Xian Zhang > Dhruv Dhody > Filename : draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations- > 02.txt > Pages : 23 > Date : 2015-01-13 >=20 > Abstract: > A stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) has access to not only > the > information disseminated by the network's Interior Gateway > Protocol > (IGP), but also the set of active paths and their reserved > resources > for its computation. The additional Label Switched Path (LSP) > state > information allows the PCE to compute constrained paths while > considering individual LSPs and their interactions. This requires > a > reliable state synchronization mechanism between the PCE and the > network, PCE and path computation clients (PCCs), and between > cooperating PCEs. The basic mechanism for state synchronization > is > part of the stateful PCE specification. This draft presents > motivations for optimizations to the base state synchronization > procedure and specifies the required Path Computation Element > Communication Protocol (PCEP) extensions. >=20 >=20 >=20 > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync- > optimizations/ >=20 > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync- > optimizations-02 >=20 > A diff from the previous version is available at: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync- > optimizations-02 >=20 >=20 > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at > tools.ietf.org. >=20 > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From nobody Tue Jan 13 20:53:51 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA631A89B5 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:53:50 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ejokdUxE1W7 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:53:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D57E51A89AC for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:53:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BRI05794; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:53:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.60) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:53:45 +0000 Received: from szxeml561-mbx.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.217]) by szxeml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:53:40 +0800 From: Udayasree palle To: "julien.meuric@orange.com" , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll on draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 Thread-Index: AQHQLl0U0v30lcSn9kqjMmW9922EwJy/DzTg Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:53:40 +0000 Message-ID: References: <30282_1421063031_54B3B377_30282_3283_1_54B3B377.3060306@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <30282_1421063031_54B3B377_30282_3283_1_54B3B377.3060306@orange.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.18.147.110] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll on draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:53:50 -0000 Support! Regards, Udaya -----Original Message----- From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meuric@orange.c= om Sent: 12 January 2015 17:14 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll on draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 Dear PCE WG, Following our previous discussions on IRO within PCEP, do you agree with th= e adoption of draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 as a PCE WG I-D? Please share y= our comments using the mailing list, justifying as much as possible in case= you are opposed. Thanks, JP & Julien ___________________________________________________________________________= ______________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confiden= tielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou = copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez= le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Le= s messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline to= ute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged inf= ormation that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used= or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and dele= te this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been = modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From nobody Wed Jan 14 03:45:23 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34AF1B2C66 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:45:21 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XmI_yCUPxWeE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:45:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from villa.puc.rediris.es (villa.puc.rediris.es [IPv6:2001:720:418:ca00::7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A92F41B2C65 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:45:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [2001:40b0:7c22:6020:1cd3:289c:2f1c:7f12] (helo=leo) by villa.puc.rediris.es with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YBMNr-0000Pe-UH for pce@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:45:13 +0100 Received: from [84.88.61.50] (unknown [84.88.61.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by leo (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1A2C1FC56 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:45:08 +0100 (CET) X-Envelope-From: ramon.casellas@cttc.es Message-ID: <54B656BC.5020909@cttc.es> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:45:00 +0100 From: Ramon Casellas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pce@ietf.org References: <30282_1421063031_54B3B377_30282_3283_1_54B3B377.3060306@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <30282_1421063031_54B3B377_30282_3283_1_54B3B377.3060306@orange.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spamina-Bogosity: Unsure X-Spamina-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-Spamina-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-1.0 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -0.0 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20% [score: 0.0521] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: orange.com] Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll on draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:45:22 -0000 El 12/01/2015 a las 12:43, julien.meuric@orange.com escribió: > Dear PCE WG, > > Following our previous discussions on IRO within PCEP, do you agree > with the adoption of draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 as a PCE WG I-D? > Please share your comments using the mailing list, justifying as much > as possible in case you are opposed. All, Imho it can be adopted. It clarifies RFC5440 to state that IRO is ordered and the role of L bit. Being involved in the domain sequence draft that triggered this, and contributed to the survey, I am ok with the outcome. That said, and for completeness, I remember someone (Adrian?) mentioned in the past that not assuming ordering in IRO could mean more flexibility to the PCE. Maybe this can be addressed in the future? thanks Ramon From nobody Wed Jan 14 03:53:03 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E14E1B2C6D for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:53:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gL9mkjH5102I for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:53:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from navarro.puc.rediris.es (navarro.puc.rediris.es [IPv6:2001:720:418:ca01::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B4CC1A89BB for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:53:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [2001:40b0:7c22:6020:1cd3:289c:2f1c:7f12] (helo=leo) by navarro.puc.rediris.es with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YBMVM-0000U8-61 for pce@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:52:57 +0100 Received: from [84.88.61.50] (unknown [84.88.61.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by leo (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1AEAD1FC56 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:52:53 +0100 (CET) X-Envelope-From: ramon.casellas@cttc.es Message-ID: <54B6588D.5050108@cttc.es> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:52:45 +0100 From: Ramon Casellas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pce@ietf.org References: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B870214AC@BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com> <29817_1421062830_54B3B2AE_29817_2225_1_54B3B2AD.5020208@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <29817_1421062830_54B3B2AE_29817_2225_1_54B3B2AD.5020208@orange.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamina-Bogosity: Unsure X-Spamina-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spamina-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-0.2 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4211] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ietf.org] Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pce] Next Steps for IRO, Domain-Seq documents... X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:53:02 -0000 >> 1. IRO-Survey >> (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-iro-survey/) >> > [JM] This was preliminary and necessary work for the following I-D. > Not sure the overhead from authors/chairs/shepherds to reach RFC is > required, but if the WG thinks otherwise, we may consider it. > Ramon> no preference, either way. I guess a use for the survey is to support the IRO update document, and having it as RFC means it will not expire. otoh, I agree it is a significant overhead and will, eventually, become obsolete. If it is dropped, stating in the IRO update draft that a surver was conducted would be enough. >> 2. IRO-Update >> (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-iro-update/) >> WG Adoption Call? >> A simple I-D, should be fast tracked? >> > [JM] This is the significant output of the above. We will proceed > accordingly. Ramon> Replied in previous mail, I am in favor of adoption, no objection to fast-track (*if* the WG agrees on ordered list, and L bit, which is the main and only change, iirc) > >> 3. Domain-Sequence >> (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence/) >> Wenhu asked WG about the track of the document, What is the WG >> opinion? Does it needs to be on standards track? >> Ready to be moved along towards publication... > [JM] Here, we really need to hear the WG's opinion. It is not too late > to change (again), but we need to see more views about this before > moving again. > Ramon> (as a co-author) I have a personal preference for standards track, but I would not object strongly to experimental. Thanks Ramon From nobody Wed Jan 14 05:35:16 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976BF1A8ACE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 05:35:10 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.761 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.761 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y6omaju4sizs for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 05:35:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2F741A8AC5 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 05:35:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BRI56619; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:35:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.71) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:35:03 +0000 Received: from SZXEMA512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.43]) by SZXEMA412-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.71]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 21:34:52 +0800 From: "Zhangxian (Xian)" To: Dhruv Dhody , "julien.meuric@orange.com" , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll on draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 Thread-Index: AQHQLl0UBGDDKuAWX0i8ZdGLZHxqfJy9MvaA//+6UYCAAqepZQ== Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:34:52 +0000 Message-ID: References: <30282_1421063031_54B3B377_30282_3283_1_54B3B377.3060306@orange.com> , <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B87027348@BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B87027348@BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.46.113.48] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll on draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:35:10 -0000 SGksIERocnV2LA0KDQogICBMb29rIGZpbmUgdG8gbWUuIGp1c3QgYSByZWFsbHkgbWlub3IgY29t bWVudCwgdXAgdG8geW91IHRvIGRlY2lkZSB3aGV0aGVyIHRvIHVwZGF0ZSBvciBub3QsIDopOiBp bnN0ZWFkIG9mIHNheWluZyAiIGFuIGF0dHJpYnV0ZSBjYWxsZWQgTCBiaXQgIiwgbWF5YmUganVz dCBzdGF0ZSAiTCBiaXQiLCBjb3ogaSBiZWxpZXZlIGl0IGlzIGludHJvZHVjZWQgZWFybGllciBp biB0aGUgZHJhZnQ/DQoNCkNoZWVycywNClhpYW4NCg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0Kt6K8/sjLOiBEaHJ1diBEaG9keQ0Kt6LLzcqxvOQ6IDIwMTXE6jHU wjEzyNUgMTI6MTkNCsrVvP7IyzogWmhhbmd4aWFuIChYaWFuKTsganVsaWVuLm1ldXJpY0BvcmFu Z2UuY29tOyBwY2VAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCtb3zOI6IFJFOiBbUGNlXSBQb2xsIG9uIGRyYWZ0LWRob2R5 LXBjZS1pcm8tdXBkYXRlLTAyDQoNCkhpIFhpYW4sDQoNClRoYW5rcyBmb3IgeW91ciBzdXBwb3J0 IGFuZCBzdWdnZXN0aW9uLg0KDQpIb3cgYWJvdXQgdGhlc2UgY2hhbmdlcyAtDQoNCk9MRDoNCiAg IFRoZSBjb250ZW50IG9mIGFuIElSTyBvYmplY3QgaXMgYW4gb3JkZXJlZCBsaXN0IG9mIHN1Ym9i amVjdHMNCiAgIHJlcHJlc2VudGluZyBhIHNlcmllcyBvZiBhYnN0cmFjdCBub2Rlcy4NCk5FVzoN CiAgIFRoZSBjb250ZW50IG9mIGFuIElSTyBvYmplY3QgTVVTVCBiZSBhbiBvcmRlcmVkIGxpc3Qg b2Ygc3Vib2JqZWN0cw0KICAgcmVwcmVzZW50aW5nIGEgc2VyaWVzIG9mIGFic3RyYWN0IG5vZGVz Lg0KDQpPTEQ6DQogICBGdXJ0aGVyIGVhY2ggc3Vib2JqZWN0IGhhcyBhbiBhdHRyaWJ1dGUNCiAg IGNhbGxlZCAnTCBiaXQnLCB3aGljaCBpcyBzZXQgaWYgdGhlIHN1Ym9iamVjdCByZXByZXNlbnRz IGEgbG9vc2UgaG9wLg0KICAgSWYgdGhlIGJpdCBpcyBub3Qgc2V0LCB0aGUgc3Vib2JqZWN0IHJl cHJlc2VudHMgYSBzdHJpY3QgaG9wLg0KTkVXOg0KICAgRnVydGhlciwgdGhlIGxvb3NlIG9yIHN0 cmljdCBwcm9wZXJ0eSBvZiB0aGUgc3Vib2JqZWN0IE1VU1QgYmUNCiAgIGludGVycHJldGVkIGJh c2VkIG9uIGFuIGF0dHJpYnV0ZSBjYWxsZWQgJ0wgYml0Jywgd2hpY2ggaXMgc2V0DQogICBpZiB0 aGUgc3Vib2JqZWN0IHJlcHJlc2VudHMgYSBsb29zZSBob3AuIElmIHRoZSBiaXQgaXMgbm90IHNl dCwgdGhlDQogICBzdWJvYmplY3QgcmVwcmVzZW50cyBhIHN0cmljdCBob3AuDQoNClJlZ2FyZHMs DQpEaHJ1dg0KDQo+IC0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQo+IEZyb206IFBjZSBbbWFp bHRvOnBjZS1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXSBPbiBCZWhhbGYgT2YgWmhhbmd4aWFuIChYaWFuKQ0K PiBTZW50OiAxMyBKYW51YXJ5IDIwMTUgMDk6MDkNCj4gVG86IGp1bGllbi5tZXVyaWNAb3Jhbmdl LmNvbTsgcGNlQGlldGYub3JnDQo+IFN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBbUGNlXSBQb2xsIG9uIGRyYWZ0LWRo b2R5LXBjZS1pcm8tdXBkYXRlLTAyDQo+DQo+IFN1cHBvcnQuDQo+DQo+IEEgdmVyeSBzdHJhaWdo dGZvcndhcmQgZHJhZnQsIGp1c3Qgb25lIHN1Z2dlc3Rpb246DQo+DQo+IFNob3VsZCB0aGUgbGFz dCBwYXJhZ3JhcGggb2YgU2VjdGlvbiAyIGJlIHdyaXR0ZW4gaW4gUkZDMjExOSBsYW5ndWFnZT8N Cj4gSSBub3RpY2UgdGhlIGZpcnN0IHNlbnRlbmNlIGluIHRoaXMgc2VjdGlvbiB1c2VzIE1VU1Qg Zm9yIHByb3ZpZGluZw0KPiBiYWNrZ3JvdW5kIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uLiBPdGhlciB0aGFuIHRoYXQs IG5vIFJGQzIxMTkgbGFuZ3VhZ2UgaXMgdXNlZC4NCj4NCj4gUmVnYXJkcywNCj4gWGlhbg0KPg0K PiAtLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KPiBGcm9tOiBQY2UgW21haWx0bzpwY2UtYm91 bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gT24gQmVoYWxmIE9mDQo+IGp1bGllbi5tZXVyaWNAb3JhbmdlLmNvbQ0K PiBTZW50OiAyMDE1xOox1MIxMsjVIDE5OjQ0DQo+IFRvOiBwY2VAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4gU3ViamVj dDogW1BjZV0gUG9sbCBvbiBkcmFmdC1kaG9keS1wY2UtaXJvLXVwZGF0ZS0wMg0KPg0KPiBEZWFy IFBDRSBXRywNCj4NCj4gRm9sbG93aW5nIG91ciBwcmV2aW91cyBkaXNjdXNzaW9ucyBvbiBJUk8g d2l0aGluIFBDRVAsIGRvIHlvdSBhZ3JlZQ0KPiB3aXRoIHRoZSBhZG9wdGlvbiBvZiBkcmFmdC1k aG9keS1wY2UtaXJvLXVwZGF0ZS0wMiBhcyBhIFBDRSBXRyBJLUQ/DQo+IFBsZWFzZSBzaGFyZSB5 b3VyIGNvbW1lbnRzIHVzaW5nIHRoZSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QsIGp1c3RpZnlpbmcgYXMgbXVjaA0K PiBhcyBwb3NzaWJsZSBpbiBjYXNlIHlvdSBhcmUgb3Bwb3NlZC4NCj4NCj4gVGhhbmtzLA0KPg0K PiBKUCAmIEp1bGllbg0KPg0KPg0KPiBfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj4gX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KPg0KPiBDZSBtZXNzYWdlIGV0IHNl cyBwaWVjZXMgam9pbnRlcyBwZXV2ZW50IGNvbnRlbmlyIGRlcyBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbnMNCj4gY29u ZmlkZW50aWVsbGVzIG91IHByaXZpbGVnaWVlcyBldCBuZSBkb2l2ZW50IGRvbmMgcGFzIGV0cmUg ZGlmZnVzZXMsDQo+IGV4cGxvaXRlcyBvdSBjb3BpZXMgc2FucyBhdXRvcmlzYXRpb24uIFNpIHZv dXMgYXZleiByZWN1IGNlIG1lc3NhZ2UNCj4gcGFyIGVycmV1ciwgdmV1aWxsZXogbGUgc2lnbmFs ZXIgYSBsJ2V4cGVkaXRldXIgZXQgbGUgZGV0cnVpcmUgYWluc2kNCj4gcXVlIGxlcyBwaWVjZXMg am9pbnRlcy4gTGVzIG1lc3NhZ2VzIGVsZWN0cm9uaXF1ZXMgZXRhbnQgc3VzY2VwdGlibGVzDQo+ IGQnYWx0ZXJhdGlvbiwgT3JhbmdlIGRlY2xpbmUgdG91dGUgcmVzcG9uc2FiaWxpdGUgc2kgY2Ug bWVzc2FnZSBhIGV0ZQ0KPiBhbHRlcmUsIGRlZm9ybWUgb3UgZmFsc2lmaWUuIE1lcmNpLg0KPg0K PiBUaGlzIG1lc3NhZ2UgYW5kIGl0cyBhdHRhY2htZW50cyBtYXkgY29udGFpbiBjb25maWRlbnRp YWwgb3INCj4gcHJpdmlsZWdlZCBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiB0aGF0IG1heSBiZSBwcm90ZWN0ZWQgYnkg bGF3OyB0aGV5IHNob3VsZCBub3QNCj4gYmUgZGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQsIHVzZWQgb3IgY29waWVkIHdp dGhvdXQgYXV0aG9yaXNhdGlvbi4NCj4gSWYgeW91IGhhdmUgcmVjZWl2ZWQgdGhpcyBlbWFpbCBp biBlcnJvciwgcGxlYXNlIG5vdGlmeSB0aGUgc2VuZGVyDQo+IGFuZCBkZWxldGUgdGhpcyBtZXNz YWdlIGFuZCBpdHMgYXR0YWNobWVudHMuDQo+IEFzIGVtYWlscyBtYXkgYmUgYWx0ZXJlZCwgT3Jh bmdlIGlzIG5vdCBsaWFibGUgZm9yIG1lc3NhZ2VzIHRoYXQgaGF2ZQ0KPiBiZWVuIG1vZGlmaWVk LCBjaGFuZ2VkIG9yIGZhbHNpZmllZC4NCj4gVGhhbmsgeW91Lg0KPg0KPiBfX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KPiBQY2UgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQo+ IFBjZUBpZXRmLm9yZw0KPiBodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3Bj ZQ0KPiBfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KPiBQ Y2UgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQo+IFBjZUBpZXRmLm9yZw0KPiBodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9t YWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3BjZQ== From nobody Wed Jan 14 10:18:56 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784A61AC3D0 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:18:54 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7KkOojETKU-S for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:18:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (asmtp4.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEA1E1AC398 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:18:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t0EIIndk017636 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:18:49 GMT Received: from 950129200 (84-199-88-196.iFiber.telenet-ops.be [84.199.88.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t0EII78G017180 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:18:49 GMT From: "Adrian Farrel" To: References: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B870214AC@BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com> <29817_1421062830_54B3B2AE_29817_2225_1_54B3B2AD.5020208@orange.com> <54B6588D.5050108@cttc.es> In-Reply-To: <54B6588D.5050108@cttc.es> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:18:07 -0000 Message-ID: <038f01d03026$8af4bd90$a0de38b0$@olddog.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQGpBCd1UxUBKFYpZ8iz9idMcdn+oQKPL5OhAi8fLduc6E2z8A== Content-Language: en-gb X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1576-7.5.0.1018-21250.002 X-TM-AS-Result: No--8.421-10.0-31-10 X-imss-scan-details: No--8.421-10.0-31-10 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: nVQUmLJJeyY4HKI/yaqRmwNN0R+idwGj31asM/gsp2neTWVpUu3B1+vE yxDySR+afnDkVKuOgNWJMgCU3ykWzjlyVH8jNStNA9lly13c/gHj5lyuq8IOQXBhAXW2InVaIVx WOBPOWFbfAPJNdqGRlZEOstfm0Bl5KfTp3wVRUm0oAEFlnc8+RX0tCKdnhB58vqq8s2MNhPB/KM EkOe61SFBIVsvVu9ABIAcCikR3vq+WhTf8yvYoV3aleR0eb2U13E6XDfMT2Y1y9OdEaCOMBctNQ np8kid1 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pce] Next Steps for IRO, Domain-Seq documents... X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:18:54 -0000 > >> 1. IRO-Survey > >> (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-iro-survey/) > >> > > [JM] This was preliminary and necessary work for the following I-D. > > Not sure the overhead from authors/chairs/shepherds to reach RFC is > > required, but if the WG thinks otherwise, we may consider it. My thoughts... As a contributor to the WG: We needed this to be sure that changing the IRO behaviour would not severely discombobulate anyone. We do not need it archived as an RFC. The I-D *is* now archived forever (even after expiring). If we want the material to continue to live (I don't think we really do) then putting it on the WG Wiki would be fine. As an AD: You will find it hard to get IESG support for publishing this as an RFC. Adrian From nobody Fri Jan 16 04:37:01 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0853B1ACD22 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 04:36:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KMwaQUsf1l6y for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 04:36:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 480991A9308 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 04:36:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BOC57048; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:36:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.35) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:36:54 +0000 Received: from szxeml561-mbx.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.217]) by szxeml403-hub.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 20:36:46 +0800 From: Venugopal Reddy K To: pce Thread-Topic: Few comments on draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-02 Thread-Index: AdAxiRUoiNTAWVvxRF+GqL6HQM72Tw== Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:36:46 +0000 Message-ID: <10376B02BC561F4185654159EF79002045918D39@szxeml561-mbx.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.18.146.97] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_10376B02BC561F4185654159EF79002045918D39szxeml561mbxchi_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: [Pce] Few comments on draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-02 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:36:59 -0000 --_000_10376B02BC561F4185654159EF79002045918D39szxeml561mbxchi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I have few comments on draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-02. Sorry for missi= ng in the working group lc. Hope the comments can be handled along with IET= F lc or AD review. In section 3 - To indicate a delete operation, the PCE MUST use the R flag in the SRP object in a PCUpd message. As a result of the deletion request, the PCC MUST remove all state related to the LSP, and send a PCRpt with the R flag set in the LSP object for the removed state. See details in Section 5.4. But section 5.4 shows that "PCE-initiated removal of a PCE-initiated LSP is done by setting the R (remove) flag in the SRP Object in the PCInitiate message from the PCE. The LSP is identified by the PLSP-ID in the LSP object." In section 5.3.1 - The optional SPEAKER-IDENTITY-ID TLV defined in [I-D.ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations] MAY be included in the LSP object as an optional TLV for LSPs for which the C-flag is 1, to identify the PCE who initiated the creation of the LSP on all PCEP sessions. If the TLV appears for an LSP for which the C flag is 0, the TLV MUST be ignored the PCC MUST send a PCErr message with Error- type 23 ("Bad parameter value") and error value 2 ("Speaker identity included for an LSP that is not PCE-initiated"). C flag is carried in LSP object of PCRpt messages from PCC. And SPEAKER-= IDENTITY-ID tlv is optional in that LSP object. How does PCC send PCErr mes= sage with Error-type 23 ("Bad parameter value") and error value 2 ("Speaker= identity included for an LSP that is not PCE-initiated") to PCE ? Regards, Venu --_000_10376B02BC561F4185654159EF79002045918D39szxeml561mbxchi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

  

I have few comments on= draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-02. Sorry for missing in the working grou= p lc. Hope the comments can be handled along with IETF lc or AD review.

 

In section 3 -

   To indicate a delete operation, the PCE= MUST use the R flag in the

   SRP object in a PCUpd message.  As= a result of the deletion request,

   the PCC MUST remove all state related t= o the LSP, and send a PCRpt

   with the R flag set in the LSP object f= or the removed state.  See

   details in Section 5.4.

  

   But = section 5.4 shows that

   &quo= t;PCE-initiated removal of a PCE-initiated LSP is done by setting the R

   (remove) = flag in the SRP Object in the PCInitiate message from the=

   PCE. = ; The LSP is identified by the PLSP-ID in the LSP object."  

   

   

   In section 5.3.1 -

   The optional SPEAKER-IDENTITY-ID T= LV defined in

   [I-D.ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizatio= ns] MAY be included in the LSP

   object as an optional TLV for LSPs for = which the C-flag is 1, to

   identify the PCE who initiated the crea= tion of the LSP on all PCEP

   sessions.  If the TLV appears for = an LSP for which the C flag is 0,

   the TLV MUST be ignored the PCC MUST se= nd a PCErr message with Error-

   type 23 ("Bad parameter value"= ;) and error value 2 ("Speaker identity

   included for an LSP that is not PCE-ini= tiated").

  

   C flag is carried in LSP object of PCRpt m= essages from PCC. And SPEAKER-IDENTITY-ID tlv is optional in that LSP objec= t. How does PCC send PCErr message with Error-type 23 ("Bad parameter value") and error value 2 ("Speaker identit= y included for an LSP that is not PCE-initiated") to PCE ?<= /span>

 

Regards,

Venu

--_000_10376B02BC561F4185654159EF79002045918D39szxeml561mbxchi_-- From nobody Wed Jan 21 08:52:46 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF701A1B1E for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:52:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uLkG_GgUOCiG for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:52:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ie0-x231.google.com (mail-ie0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F9971A1B1C for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:52:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id at20so16794590iec.8 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:52:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=o+QL8lNLAvxi3f4e95/Sq00M5DBDiePl3PAsGVFDDY0=; b=g9KS6Dr7ieLMmsCcRJukKAlu+/yVKgFooxDIvZnU6DUS1cTS3dOUQAq4N1MSVERsKa f2fFODNTiqTKx/+AxcNlUxmm1n8G/CRZPAKtETxgnfws9SLFpLrUasuW47ui90zOpFal eMpZfR8gFr+CLmC5E2aueYQus2p+LwkEZAFe75pT6Nyo1BPkFVdksGayTHft3T3GT7lk XXc5+Y2aff47dIxld/DB/1wU8n+O1Z+2gTsOqCLbqCRFCVevlVxBhVe+aN0mW8fi5/Cm WNqX9W9DSv9lCgL6vrfhuoXIWqIdWVPYGgFGyLDq3zeoTsNJoBtu5qpvhY/9N/oz+z/5 eFiA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.66.171 with SMTP id g11mr5578005igt.49.1421859161696; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:52:41 -0800 (PST) Sender: dhruvdhody@gmail.com X-Google-Sender-Delegation: dhruvdhody@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.154.68 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:52:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 22:22:41 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: jOdYrmcXju1er9smSGLU0x8eSY4 Message-ID: From: Dhruv Dhody To: "pce@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Archived-At: Subject: [Pce] Update to draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-interdomain/draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-lspdb-sync X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:52:44 -0000 Hi, We have updated following IDs - ID: draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-interdomain Title: Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) Inter-domain Considerations URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-interdomain-01.txt Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-interdomain-01 Changes in -01 ~ A new section on PCE-initiated inter-domain LSP ~ Other Editorial Changes ID: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-lspdb-sync Title: LSP-DB Synchronization between Stateful PCEs URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-lspdb-sync-04.txt Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-lspdb-sync-04 Changes in -04 ~ Clarify the rationale for a Primary PCE to a Backup PCE synchronization ~ Other Editorial Changes Please provide comments on these documents. Regards, Dhruv From nobody Tue Jan 27 08:18:19 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8941A884B; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:18:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ERJ7NfqjnFMj; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:18:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4071A017D; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:18:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.10.1.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150127161814.22660.6081.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:18:14 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-02.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:18:16 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF. Title : Extensions to Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Hierarchical Path Computation Elements (PCE) Authors : Fatai Zhang Quintin Zhao Oscar Gonzalez de Dios Ramon Casellas Daniel King Filename : draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-02.txt Pages : 19 Date : 2015-01-27 Abstract: The Hierarchical Path Computation Element (H-PCE) architecture, provides a mechanism to allow the optimum sequence of domains to be selected,and the optimum end-to-end path to be derived through the use of a hierarchical relationship between domains. This document defines the Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) extensions for the purpose of implementing Hierarchical PCE procedures which are described in the aforementioned document. These extensions are experimental and published for examination, discussion, implementation, and evaluation. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Tue Jan 27 08:25:22 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711831A1A5A for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:25:19 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1QZFbELutJKX for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:25:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (mail-wi0-f176.google.com [209.85.212.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A2D61A8864 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:25:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id em10so6021435wid.3 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:25:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=qtvSTRawGQn873m66oPqtQvNjkYoG/rvvgMKTyNRNyU=; b=CaWaGLSj+OgrK5P0cjHuApJYUI/eUi+0mvymTC9usGDBMvf3ppTQAdTRScPZ4Mkla+ y2bXc7xnMXv1kvpA++zbbAWSW6siGcricSNuyBFDXmn4Lvijy0OoshZxeF8/lbal8c0x 5al++Lasyrm2hvPNHC+EOY2WBmuo/rWj9vfdR+Tt2TjwgY62Pmmsdk9M0SoEDquD/Fc8 j3sMqt5dTbN5hx8XIEAjskIXkrL8cI+IkLtWdF1SbKJzLrvdez5OTcbzd43sNK6Yi5hT L7uhgxOQxly81RfRqLQiCdRwRmQKvOW4X7wpFB/qty1WxFTnfvi6QBTdgxi26K2LRLRw Bfog== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmIKryogffIP8Ovfyzx3YPWq/htXCHaeQdyfPQ1kwMV+M8HiRnpxfAW/+AaROYhLlJTqgYH X-Received: by 10.194.240.201 with SMTP id wc9mr2001937wjc.57.1422375913029; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:25:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from MAL ([217.33.180.162]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dz10sm2796667wib.17.2015.01.27.08.25.11 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:25:12 -0800 (PST) Sender: Daniel King X-Google-Original-Sender: "Daniel King" From: "Daniel King" To: Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:25:11 -0000 Message-ID: <02f401d03a4d$d2f92320$78eb6960$@olddog.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AdA6Tbn6putgPK6ESi6yjIkQ2rUlEg== Content-Language: en-gb Archived-At: Subject: [Pce] Recent H-PCE Extension Updates (RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-02) X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:25:20 -0000 Hi All, As just announced, we submitted a new version of the H-PCE extensions I-D. Updates include: - Discussion on H-PCE Manageability Considerations - Discussion on H-PCE Security - Adding "Implementation Status" section, this will be removed before publication - Sprinkling of new references and sorting existing references into normative and informative - Minor NIT fixes BR, Dan. -----Original Message----- From: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org Sent: 27 January 2015 16:18 To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-02.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF. Title : Extensions to Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Hierarchical Path Computation Elements (PCE) Authors : Fatai Zhang Quintin Zhao Oscar Gonzalez de Dios Ramon Casellas Daniel King Filename : draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-02.txt Pages : 19 Date : 2015-01-27 Abstract: The Hierarchical Path Computation Element (H-PCE) architecture, provides a mechanism to allow the optimum sequence of domains to be selected,and the optimum end-to-end path to be derived through the use of a hierarchical relationship between domains. This document defines the Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) extensions for the purpose of implementing Hierarchical PCE procedures which are described in the aforementioned document. These extensions are experimental and published for examination, discussion, implementation, and evaluation. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce mailing list I-D-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt From nobody Wed Jan 28 19:05:44 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C23771A8AE3 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:05:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.422 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.422 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cH_TRhrOWG8d for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:05:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 989411A1B10 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:05:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BRV88395; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 03:05:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nkgeml409-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.40) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 03:05:37 +0000 Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.146]) by nkgeml409-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:05:30 +0800 From: Qin Wu To: Daniel King , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Recent H-PCE Extension Updates (RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-02) Thread-Index: AdA6Tbn6putgPK6ESi6yjIkQ2rUlEgBIiULw Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 03:05:29 +0000 Message-ID: References: <02f401d03a4d$d2f92320$78eb6960$@olddog.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <02f401d03a4d$d2f92320$78eb6960$@olddog.co.uk> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.180] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pce] Recent H-PCE Extension Updates (RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-02) X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 03:05:43 -0000 SGksIERhbjoNCkluIHRoZSBmaXJzdCBwYXJhZ3JhcGggb2Ygc2VjdXJpdHkgc2VjdGlvbiwgaXQg bWVudGlvbnMgdXNpbmcgVExTIHRvIHByb3ZpZGUgc2VjdXJpdHkgcHJvdGVjdGlvbi4NCk1heSBJ IHN1Z2dlc3QgdG8gYWRkIHJlZmVyZW5jZSB0byBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLXBjZS1wY2Vwcz8NCg0KUmVn YXJkcyENCi1RaW4NCi0tLS0t08q8/tStvP4tLS0tLQ0Kt6K8/sjLOiBQY2UgW21haWx0bzpwY2Ut Ym91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gtPqx7SBEYW5pZWwgS2luZw0Kt6LLzcqxvOQ6IDIwMTXE6jHUwjI4 yNUgMDoyNQ0KytW8/sjLOiBwY2VAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCtb3zOI6IFtQY2VdIFJlY2VudCBILVBDRSBF eHRlbnNpb24gVXBkYXRlcyAoUkU6IEktRCBBY3Rpb246IGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtcGNlLWhpZXJhcmNo eS1leHRlbnNpb25zLTAyKQ0KDQpIaSBBbGwsIA0KDQpBcyBqdXN0IGFubm91bmNlZCwgd2Ugc3Vi bWl0dGVkIGEgbmV3IHZlcnNpb24gb2YgdGhlIEgtUENFIGV4dGVuc2lvbnMgSS1ELg0KVXBkYXRl cyBpbmNsdWRlOg0KDQotIERpc2N1c3Npb24gb24gSC1QQ0UgTWFuYWdlYWJpbGl0eSBDb25zaWRl cmF0aW9ucw0KLSBEaXNjdXNzaW9uIG9uIEgtUENFIFNlY3VyaXR5DQotIEFkZGluZyAiSW1wbGVt ZW50YXRpb24gU3RhdHVzIiBzZWN0aW9uLCB0aGlzIHdpbGwgYmUgcmVtb3ZlZCBiZWZvcmUgcHVi bGljYXRpb24NCi0gU3ByaW5rbGluZyBvZiBuZXcgcmVmZXJlbmNlcyBhbmQgc29ydGluZyBleGlz dGluZyByZWZlcmVuY2VzIGludG8gbm9ybWF0aXZlIGFuZCBpbmZvcm1hdGl2ZQ0KLSBNaW5vciBO SVQgZml4ZXMNCg0KQlIsIERhbi4gDQoNCi0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQpGcm9t OiBJLUQtQW5ub3VuY2UgW21haWx0bzppLWQtYW5ub3VuY2UtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gT24g QmVoYWxmIE9mIGludGVybmV0LWRyYWZ0c0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KU2VudDogMjcgSmFudWFyeSAyMDE1 IDE2OjE4DQpUbzogaS1kLWFubm91bmNlQGlldGYub3JnDQpDYzogcGNlQGlldGYub3JnDQpTdWJq ZWN0OiBJLUQgQWN0aW9uOiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLXBjZS1oaWVyYXJjaHktZXh0ZW5zaW9ucy0wMi50 eHQNCg0KDQpBIE5ldyBJbnRlcm5ldC1EcmFmdCBpcyBhdmFpbGFibGUgZnJvbSB0aGUgb24tbGlu ZSBJbnRlcm5ldC1EcmFmdHMgZGlyZWN0b3JpZXMuDQogVGhpcyBkcmFmdCBpcyBhIHdvcmsgaXRl bSBvZiB0aGUgUGF0aCBDb21wdXRhdGlvbiBFbGVtZW50IFdvcmtpbmcgR3JvdXAgb2YgdGhlIElF VEYuDQoNCiAgICAgICAgVGl0bGUgICAgICAgICAgIDogRXh0ZW5zaW9ucyB0byBQYXRoIENvbXB1 dGF0aW9uIEVsZW1lbnQNCkNvbW11bmljYXRpb24gUHJvdG9jb2wgKFBDRVApIGZvciBIaWVyYXJj aGljYWwgUGF0aCBDb21wdXRhdGlvbiBFbGVtZW50cw0KKFBDRSkNCiAgICAgICAgQXV0aG9ycyAg ICAgICAgIDogRmF0YWkgWmhhbmcNCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgUXVpbnRpbiBa aGFvDQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIE9zY2FyIEdvbnphbGV6IGRlIERpb3MNCiAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgUmFtb24gQ2FzZWxsYXMNCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgRGFuaWVsIEtpbmcNCglGaWxlbmFtZSAgICAgICAgOiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLXBjZS1o aWVyYXJjaHktZXh0ZW5zaW9ucy0wMi50eHQNCglQYWdlcyAgICAgICAgICAgOiAxOQ0KCURhdGUg ICAgICAgICAgICA6IDIwMTUtMDEtMjcNCg0KQWJzdHJhY3Q6DQogICBUaGUgSGllcmFyY2hpY2Fs IFBhdGggQ29tcHV0YXRpb24gRWxlbWVudCAoSC1QQ0UpIGFyY2hpdGVjdHVyZSwNCiAgIHByb3Zp ZGVzIGEgbWVjaGFuaXNtIHRvIGFsbG93IHRoZSBvcHRpbXVtIHNlcXVlbmNlIG9mIGRvbWFpbnMg dG8gYmUNCiAgIHNlbGVjdGVkLGFuZCB0aGUgb3B0aW11bSBlbmQtdG8tZW5kIHBhdGggdG8gYmUg ZGVyaXZlZCB0aHJvdWdoIHRoZQ0KICAgdXNlIG9mIGEgaGllcmFyY2hpY2FsIHJlbGF0aW9uc2hp cCBiZXR3ZWVuIGRvbWFpbnMuDQoNCiAgIFRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgZGVmaW5lcyB0aGUgUGF0aCBD b21wdXRhdGlvbiBFbGVtZW50IFByb3RvY29sIChQQ0VQKQ0KICAgZXh0ZW5zaW9ucyBmb3IgdGhl IHB1cnBvc2Ugb2YgaW1wbGVtZW50aW5nIEhpZXJhcmNoaWNhbCBQQ0UNCiAgIHByb2NlZHVyZXMg d2hpY2ggYXJlIGRlc2NyaWJlZCBpbiB0aGUgYWZvcmVtZW50aW9uZWQgZG9jdW1lbnQuIFRoZXNl DQogICBleHRlbnNpb25zIGFyZSBleHBlcmltZW50YWwgYW5kIHB1Ymxpc2hlZCBmb3IgZXhhbWlu YXRpb24sDQogICBkaXNjdXNzaW9uLCBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbiwgYW5kIGV2YWx1YXRpb24uDQoN Cg0KDQpUaGUgSUVURiBkYXRhdHJhY2tlciBzdGF0dXMgcGFnZSBmb3IgdGhpcyBkcmFmdCBpczoN Cmh0dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvZG9jL2RyYWZ0LWlldGYtcGNlLWhpZXJhcmNo eS1leHRlbnNpb25zLw0KDQpUaGVyZSdzIGFsc28gYSBodG1saXplZCB2ZXJzaW9uIGF2YWlsYWJs ZSBhdDoNCmh0dHA6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWlldGYtcGNlLWhpZXJhcmNo eS1leHRlbnNpb25zLTAyDQoNCkEgZGlmZiBmcm9tIHRoZSBwcmV2aW91cyB2ZXJzaW9uIGlzIGF2 YWlsYWJsZSBhdDoNCmh0dHA6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvcmZjZGlmZj91cmwyPWRyYWZ0LWlldGYt cGNlLWhpZXJhcmNoeS1leHRlbnNpb25zLTAyDQoNCg0KUGxlYXNlIG5vdGUgdGhhdCBpdCBtYXkg dGFrZSBhIGNvdXBsZSBvZiBtaW51dGVzIGZyb20gdGhlIHRpbWUgb2Ygc3VibWlzc2lvbiB1bnRp bCB0aGUgaHRtbGl6ZWQgdmVyc2lvbiBhbmQgZGlmZiBhcmUgYXZhaWxhYmxlIGF0IHRvb2xzLmll dGYub3JnLg0KDQpJbnRlcm5ldC1EcmFmdHMgYXJlIGFsc28gYXZhaWxhYmxlIGJ5IGFub255bW91 cyBGVFAgYXQ6DQpmdHA6Ly9mdHAuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaW50ZXJuZXQtZHJhZnRzLw0KDQpfX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KSS1ELUFubm91bmNlIG1h aWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KSS1ELUFubm91bmNlQGlldGYub3JnDQpodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9t YWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2ktZC1hbm5vdW5jZQ0KSW50ZXJuZXQtRHJhZnQgZGlyZWN0b3JpZXM6 IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvc2hhZG93Lmh0bWwgb3IgZnRwOi8vZnRwLmlldGYub3JnL2ll dGYvMXNoYWRvdy1zaXRlcy50eHQNCg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX18NClBjZSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNClBjZUBpZXRmLm9yZw0KaHR0cHM6Ly93 d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9wY2UNCg==