Subject: [pm-dir] STATUS [was RE: PM DIR review of draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp]

From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:13:56 -0500

Thanks Jan!

I ask for a check of all the drafts that
pop out of the search machine, and since you've
contributed so many reviews it's time you had
an easy one!

I'll update the status page, where there are
four more drafts needing *volunteer reviewers*,
the practice which ensures both choice of assignments
and continued membership in the directorate:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmKrqWIOBsprdGZqMnB6dmx5bFJvVUhta3VLSjl3SkE&usp=sharing

Al
pm-dir admin

From: Jan Novak (janovak) [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 7:21 AM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: PM DIR review of draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp

Al,

The draft is quite short and defines just BGP TLVs to transmit various
link performance attributes (hence the match for the PM-DIR review)
using BGP speakers.
It does not define any performance metrics and RFC6390 is therefore
not applicable.

Jan

The climate of Edinburgh is such that the weak succumb young, and the strong envy them ....
                                 Dr. Johnson