From carlsonj@workingcode.com Thu Jun 3 13:57:33 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pppext@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: pppext@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EFD13A6A33 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 13:57:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, GB_I_INVITATION=-2, GB_I_LETTER=-2] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id et57LZ+EgerV for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 13:57:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carlson.workingcode.com (carlsonj-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1d9::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8153A6A2A for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 13:57:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.50.23.149] (gate.abinitio.com [65.170.40.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by carlson.workingcode.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o53Kv767022501 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 16:57:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C081723.7000408@workingcode.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:57:07 -0400 From: James Carlson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pppext@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DCC-x.dcc-servers-Metrics: carlson; whitelist Subject: [Pppext] IETF 78 - Meeting and Sponsorship Information X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: PPP Extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:57:33 -0000 I've been asked to forward this message along to the working group so that folks know about the sponsorship opportunities. Note that I know of no requests to have the PPP Extensions working group meet, nor do I have any current plans to hold working group meetings in Maastricht. 78th IETF Meeting Maastricht, Netherlands July 25-30, 2010 1. Sponsorship Opportunities 2. Registration Types 3. Visas and Letters of Invitation 4. Accommodations & Breakfast Information 5. IETF 79 (Beijing) Visa Information 1) Sponsorship Opportunities There are still sponsorship opportunities and benefits for high profile company/organizational exposure at the upcoming IETF meeting in Maastricht, Netherlands from July 25-30, 2010. All sponsorship fees go directly to fund the operations of the IETF. See the options at: http://www.ietf.org/meeting/78/index.html "Sponsorship Opportunities" under "General." Each of the sponsorship options provide extended and repeat exposure at this weeklong meeting. Please contact Drew Dvorshak, dvorshak@isoc.org, with any questions and/or to reserve your organization's spot. Thanks in advance for supporting the critical work of the IETF! 2) Register online at: http://www.ietf.org/meetings/78/ 3) Letters of Invitation and Visas Letters of Invitation After you complete the meeting registration process, you will be given the option to request a letter of invitation. You can request the Letter of Invitation as soon as you finish registration, or at a later time by following the link provided in the confirmation email. Visas Please check the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs site (http://www.minbuza.nl/en/Services/Consular_Services/Visa) for list of countries with visa exemptions. We recommend you give yourself at least one month to complete the visa process. 4) Accommodations & Breakfast Information http://www.ietf.org/meeting/78/hotel.html 5) If you want to start planning for your trip to IETF 79 in Beijing, we have visa information online here: http://www.ietf.org/meeting/79/visa.html Only 52 days until IETF 78! -- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W From d3e3e3@gmail.com Fri Jun 4 18:36:49 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pppext@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: pppext@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922D53A680E for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 18:36:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.042 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.042 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.044, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01YbyxVN7zfn for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 18:36:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585823A6803 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 18:36:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so1311947wyf.31 for ; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 18:36:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=pa1GYk1lG1ZiHtDrco4oNtjCYF3lOnrPKZpppbzE+ac=; b=h0TSN249JLx/h5A942bhfXf0SLdYOfpbTXepXxL63f6eWdXOBktMPYg0ghtG7jIbi3 hT3qaqykOJ6H+LlMiA6yuFBMcsnl2gcaaAPJ5pYJumabAzRniad5kg9QW4jfBZd+If0a Iu4m3ZWwBpWIYEaL3iRrHuijkFbXKKjJof2F0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=URb6VM2/Y5qZi87M5B0kM0mepcx4YqmfYYg7DBl7wgK525aQpWCutHVP9P42DdongM REMyW/EU20a+xoofa47O9960aNoPnSIwehVSmio6ectG12AeyPxn76zIsAcYuBMQEdQh FeQS9v5TBQeFSMEjhzSmwfVWJOVIR4VWmCaHo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.86.19 with SMTP id v19mr255254wee.89.1275701791251; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 18:36:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.229.210 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 18:36:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BFFAB96.6080606@workingcode.com> References: <20100527164502.B487E3A6AFA@core3.amsl.com> <4BFFAB96.6080606@workingcode.com> Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 21:36:31 -0400 Message-ID: From: Donald Eastlake To: James Carlson Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d99bfe1b5e0004883e7809 Cc: pppext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pppext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pppext-trill-protocol-01.txt X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: PPP Extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 01:36:49 -0000 --0016e6d99bfe1b5e0004883e7809 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:40 AM, James Carlson wrote: > On 05/27/10 23:45, Donald Eastlake wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Although I am not a PPP expert, I think this draft looks pretty good. > > Now that TRILL has been approved as a Proposed Standard, I think this > > draft should be advanced. > > > > However, I do have a question on one sentence: > > In Section 3 on Page 4, numbered item 2, the following sentence occurs: > > If the peer is an RBridge, then there is no need to > > pass unencapsulated frames nor to any TRILL-ignorant peer to be > > concerned about. > > > > I assume that most of the end of this sentence shouldn't be there... > > I think there's just an extra word in the sentence (s/nor to/nor/). It > reads better as: > > If the peer is an RBridge, then there is no need to > pass unencapsulated frames, as the link can have no TRILL- > ignorant peer to be concerned about. > > The point of sending unencapsulated is to make sure that TRILL-ignorant > nodes are able to see the traffic. But, since this is point-to-point, > we can be certain that "everyone" (i.e., the one guy we're sending to) > knows TRILL. OK, that one word fix makes sense to me. Thanks, Donald -- > James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W > --0016e6d99bfe1b5e0004883e7809 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:40 AM, James Carlson <= span dir=3D"ltr"><carlsonj@w= orkingcode.com> wrote:
On 05/27/10 23:45, Donald Eastlake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Although I am not a PPP expert, I think this draft looks pretty good.<= br> > Now that TRILL has been approved as a Proposed Standard, =A0I think th= is
> draft should be advanced.
>
> However, I do have a question on one sentence:
> In Section 3 on Page 4, numbered item 2, the following sentence occurs= :
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0If the peer is an RBridge, then there i= s no need to
> =A0 =A0 =A0 pass unencapsulated frames nor to any TRILL-ignorant peer = to be
> =A0 =A0 =A0 concerned about.
>
> I assume that most of the end of this sentence shouldn't be there.= ..

I think there's just an extra word in the sentence (s/nor to/nor/= ). =A0It
reads better as:

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0If the peer is an RBridge, then there is no need to
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0pass unencapsulated frames, as the link can have no T= RILL-
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ignorant peer to be concerned about.

The point of sending unencapsulated is to make sure that TRILL-ignora= nt
nodes are able to see the traffic. =A0But, since this is point-to-point, we can be certain that "everyone" (i.e., the one guy we're se= nding to)
knows TRILL.

OK, that one word fix makes se= nse to me.=A0

Thanks,
Donald
<= br>
--
James Carlson =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 42.703N 71.076W =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <carlsonj@workingcode.com>

--0016e6d99bfe1b5e0004883e7809-- From carlsonj@workingcode.com Tue Jun 29 04:45:21 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pppext@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: pppext@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4062A3A6ACA for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 04:45:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qYANUKWapeGj for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 04:45:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carlson.workingcode.com (carlsonj-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1d9::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E5E3A6AC9 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 04:45:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [75.150.68.97] (carlson [75.150.68.97]) (authenticated bits=0) by carlson.workingcode.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o5TBjC32003740 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 07:45:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C29DCC7.7060407@workingcode.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 07:45:11 -0400 From: James Carlson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100214 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pppext@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DCC-x.dcc-servers-Metrics: carlson; whitelist Subject: [Pppext] draft-ietf-pppext-trill-protocol-01.txt X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: PPP Extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:45:21 -0000 Has anyone else read this? Are there any other comments on it? http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-pppext-trill-protocol-01.txt I'd like to get this draft moving forward, and it would help if there were other eyes on the text. Thanks. -- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W