From nobody Thu Sep 1 01:27:15 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A2312D5EB for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 01:27:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.17 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.17 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8dQnAmN4-0oU for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 01:27:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DA9112D1A4 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 01:27:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 73279B80A94; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 01:27:12 -0700 (PDT) To: kory@ascend.com, gurdeep@microsoft.com, glennz@microsoft.com, suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com, terry.manderson@icann.org, d3e3e3@gmail.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20160901082712.73279B80A94@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 01:27:12 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Cc: pppext@ietf.org, nmalykh@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [Pppext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC2637 (4790) X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: PPP Extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 08:27:14 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2637, "Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2637&eid=4790 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Nikolai Malykh Section: 2.2 Original Text ------------- Error Code This field is set to 0 unless a "General Error" exists, in which case Result Code is set to 2 and this field is set to the value corresponding to the general error condition as specified in section 2.2. Corrected Text -------------- Error Code This field is set to 0 unless a "General Error" exists, in which case Result Code is set to 2 and this field is set to the value corresponding to the general error condition as specified in section 2.16. Notes ----- Incorrect reference to section 2.2. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC2637 (draft-ietf-pppext-pptp-10) -------------------------------------- Title : Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP) Publication Date : July 1999 Author(s) : K. Hamzeh, G. Pall, W. Verthein, J. Taarud, W. Little, G. Zorn Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Point-to-Point Protocol Extensions Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Thu Sep 1 02:54:14 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D1412D8B2 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 02:54:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.17 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.17 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2vWIR5anAzZu for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 02:54:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1483412D0A6 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 02:54:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id D531EB80293; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 02:54:10 -0700 (PDT) To: kory@ascend.com, gurdeep@microsoft.com, glennz@microsoft.com, suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com, terry.manderson@icann.org, d3e3e3@gmail.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20160901095410.D531EB80293@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 02:54:10 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Cc: pppext@ietf.org, nmalykh@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [Pppext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC2637 (4791) X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: PPP Extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 09:54:12 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2637, "Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2637&eid=4791 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Nikolai Malykh Section: 2.4 Original Text ------------- Error Code This field is set to 0 unless a "General Error" exists, in which case Result Code is set to 2 and this field is set to the value corresponding to the general error condition as specified in section 2.2. Corrected Text -------------- Error Code This field is set to 0 unless a "General Error" exists, in which case Result Code is set to 2 and this field is set to the value corresponding to the general error condition as specified in section 2.16. Notes ----- Incorrect reference to section 2.2 Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC2637 (draft-ietf-pppext-pptp-10) -------------------------------------- Title : Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP) Publication Date : July 1999 Author(s) : K. Hamzeh, G. Pall, W. Verthein, J. Taarud, W. Little, G. Zorn Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Point-to-Point Protocol Extensions Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Thu Sep 1 03:21:27 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9BA712B04F for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 03:21:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.17 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.17 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JKqysbfUsY9S for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 03:21:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18CB9127A91 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 03:21:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 061D2B803F4; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 03:21:25 -0700 (PDT) To: kory@ascend.com, gurdeep@microsoft.com, glennz@microsoft.com, suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com, terry.manderson@icann.org, d3e3e3@gmail.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20160901102125.061D2B803F4@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 03:21:25 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Cc: pppext@ietf.org, nmalykh@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [Pppext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC2637 (4792) X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: PPP Extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 10:21:27 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2637, "Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2637&eid=4792 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Nikolai Malykh Section: 2.6 Original Text ------------- Error Code This field is set to 0 unless a "General Error" condition exists, in which case Result Code is set to 2 and this field is set to the value corresponding to the general error condition as specified in section 2.2. Corrected Text -------------- Error Code This field is set to 0 unless a "General Error" condition exists, in which case Result Code is set to 2 and this field is set to the value corresponding to the general error condition as specified in section 2.16. Notes ----- Incorrect reference to section 2.2 Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC2637 (draft-ietf-pppext-pptp-10) -------------------------------------- Title : Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP) Publication Date : July 1999 Author(s) : K. Hamzeh, G. Pall, W. Verthein, J. Taarud, W. Little, G. Zorn Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Point-to-Point Protocol Extensions Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Thu Sep 1 04:52:34 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE80712D933 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 04:52:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.448 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fvSLBixLJ40q for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 04:52:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carlson.workingcode.com (carlson.workingcode.com [75.150.68.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B30B12D95B for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 04:50:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.49.72.142] (fw-lex.abinitio.com [65.170.40.234]) (authenticated bits=0) by carlson.workingcode.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id u81Bm414000864 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:48:05 -0400 To: RFC Errata System , kory@ascend.com, gurdeep@microsoft.com, glennz@microsoft.com, suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com, terry.manderson@icann.org, d3e3e3@gmail.com References: <20160901082712.73279B80A94@rfc-editor.org> From: James Carlson Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:48:04 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160901082712.73279B80A94@rfc-editor.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DCC--Metrics: carlson 1356; Body=9 Fuz1=9 Fuz2=9 Archived-At: Cc: pppext@ietf.org, nmalykh@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Pppext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC2637 (4790) X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: PPP Extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 11:52:33 -0000 On 09/01/16 04:27, RFC Errata System wrote: > Corrected Text > -------------- > Error Code This field is set to 0 unless a "General > Error" exists, in which case Result Code is > set to 2 and this field is set to the value > corresponding to the general error condition > as specified in section 2.16. The change makes sense to me, but this isn't a product of the PPPEXT working group. The RFC is Informational, and I believe that PPTP is Microsoft's product. -- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W From nobody Thu Sep 1 05:27:02 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8626612D96B for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 05:27:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.17 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.17 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BS1LnvGTVomG for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 05:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08BF2120727 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 05:20:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id CB1D9B80B55; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 05:20:44 -0700 (PDT) To: kory@ascend.com, gurdeep@microsoft.com, glennz@microsoft.com, suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com, terry.manderson@icann.org, d3e3e3@gmail.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20160901122044.CB1D9B80B55@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 05:20:44 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Cc: pppext@ietf.org, nmalykh@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [Pppext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC2637 (4793) X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: PPP Extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 12:27:00 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2637, "Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2637&eid=4793 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Nikolai Malykh Section: 2.8 Original Text ------------- Error Code This field is set to 0 unless a "General Error" condition exists, in which case Result Code is set to 2 and this field is set to the value corresponding to the general error condition as specified in section 2.2. Corrected Text -------------- Error Code This field is set to 0 unless a "General Error" condition exists, in which case Result Code is set to 2 and this field is set to the value corresponding to the general error condition as specified in section 2.16. Notes ----- Incorrect reference to section 2.2. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC2637 (draft-ietf-pppext-pptp-10) -------------------------------------- Title : Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP) Publication Date : July 1999 Author(s) : K. Hamzeh, G. Pall, W. Verthein, J. Taarud, W. Little, G. Zorn Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Point-to-Point Protocol Extensions Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Tue Sep 13 15:20:56 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2902212B0E7 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:20:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.129 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.129 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nlYh25-pL3e7 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:20:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A5DE12B0DB for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:20:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9931E5A0B; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:15:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oz5h3_z1XjXC; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:15:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (cpe-76-174-176-44.socal.res.rr.com [76.174.176.44]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7B6F91E5A07; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:15:16 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Megan Ferguson In-Reply-To: <8C335DA6-4C56-4C73-ACBC-A6354CB5E0AE@avatarci.com> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:20:49 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6E408EB6-EC02-43FD-828B-EEB0E91F25F8@amsl.com> References: <20160901082712.73279B80A94@rfc-editor.org> <8C335DA6-4C56-4C73-ACBC-A6354CB5E0AE@avatarci.com> To: Kory Hamzeh , James Carlson , nmalykh@gmail.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Archived-At: Cc: pppext@ietf.org, kory@ascend.com, Suresh Krishnan , gurdeep@microsoft.com, RFC System , glennz@microsoft.com, Terry Manderson Subject: Re: [Pppext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC2637 (4790) X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: PPP Extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 22:20:55 -0000 All, Thank you for your input on this errata report. In researching this case, we see a message from the IESG that states: The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP)' as an Informational RFC. This document is the product of the Point-to-Point Protocol Extensions Working Group. The IESG contact persons and Thomas Narten and Erik Nordmark. We also see the following IESG Note on the document itself: IESG Note The PPTP protocol was developed by a vendor consortium. The documentation of PPTP is provided as information to the Internet community. The PPP WG is currently defining a Standards Track protocol (L2TP) for tunneling PPP across packet-switched networks. So we have left the source as ppext for the time being. Please let us = know if you feel the message was inaccurate in 1999. Note that we have gone ahead and updated the status of this errata = report=20 to =93Verified=94 (as this change seems to be purely editorial in nature = anyway). We note that the document contains similar pointers to Section 2.2 in = the=20 following sections (in addition to the one pointed to in Section 2.2 = originally): 2.4, 2.6, 2.8, 2.10, 2.13 We have updated the notes field of the errata report to mention these = cases as=20 well. Please let us know any objection. Thank you. RFC Editor/mf On Sep 1, 2016, at 10:48 AM, Kory Hamzeh wrote: > That is correct. I was one of the authors of the RFC. All of the = people I knew at Microsoft who I worked with me on PPTP are no longer = there. Note that I was never an employee of Microsoft. I was working for = Ascend and PPTP was originally based on an Ascend VPN protocol that I = had developed. >=20 >=20 >> On Sep 1, 2016, at 4:48 AM, James Carlson = wrote: >>=20 >> On 09/01/16 04:27, RFC Errata System wrote: >>> Corrected Text >>> -------------- >>> Error Code This field is set to 0 unless a "General >>> Error" exists, in which case Result Code = is >>> set to 2 and this field is set to the = value >>> corresponding to the general error = condition >>> as specified in section 2.16. >>=20 >> The change makes sense to me, but this isn't a product of the PPPEXT >> working group. The RFC is Informational, and I believe that PPTP is >> Microsoft's product. >>=20 >> --=20 >> James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W = >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Pppext mailing list >> Pppext@ietf.org >> = https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=3Dhttps-3A__www.ietf.org_mailma= n_listinfo_pppext&d=3DDQICAg&c=3Duw6TLu4hwhHdiGJOgwcWD4AjKQx6zvFcGEsbfiY9-= EI&r=3DSjqMm98XYm7Fx3oayRe5ZQ&m=3DFlNyCGuTuio2s7VGOFBPOpOPF24huSnrbMg2qOj6= LFc&s=3DWOZCTt6FkFRoQuaE5-WNDvCrrsLdK16QlcQCbu1xlY4&e=3D=20 >=20