From nobody Tue Dec 16 06:15:29 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFE71A1AEB for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:15:26 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GIo1ydFLI-HY for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:15:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod6og104.obsmtp.com (exprod6og104.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.187]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B8A01A1AB3 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:15:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com ([72.13.63.41]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob104.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKVJA+ezh0ok9A9oI5xb70ytzZPob/Yytq@postini.com; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:15:23 PST Received: from BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexchm01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.255]) by brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id sBGEFMrO024831 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:15:22 -0500 Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:15:21 -0500 From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" To: "provreg@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5731 (4200) Thread-Index: AQHQGH+BntNiRgmcHEmXfH7H09UTWJySRDhg Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:15:21 +0000 Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4954493E@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> References: <20141215155453.BE6A118123F@rfc-editor.org> In-Reply-To: <20141215155453.BE6A118123F@rfc-editor.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/provreg/JN9ONKBVTutA0BoIMKcjtt13Z14 Subject: [provreg] FW: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5731 (4200) X-BeenThere: provreg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPP discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:15:26 -0000 FYI, folks. I'll forward the response I sent in a moment. Scott -----Original Message----- From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org]=20 Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 10:55 AM To: Hollenbeck, Scott; iesg@ietf.org Cc: bortzmeyer+rfceditor@nic.fr; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5731 (4200) The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5731, "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Domain Name Mapping". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3D5731&eid=3D4200 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: St=C3=A9phane Bortzmeyer Section: 3.2.3 Original Text ------------- C: 2000-04-03 Corrected Text -------------- C: 2000-04-03Z Notes ----- The Z for UTC seems mandatory, per section 2.4 (in XML schema, it is option= al http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/#date ). Since is the only command with date (and not date-times), one may think dates a= re not forced to have a trailing Z but it is not mentioned in the RFC. Detected by Kim-Minh Kaplan at AFNIC. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.=20 -------------------------------------- RFC5731 (draft-hollenbeck-rfc4931bis-01) -------------------------------------- Title : Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Domain Name Ma= pping Publication Date : August 2009 Author(s) : S. Hollenbeck Category : INTERNET STANDARD Source : IETF - NON WORKING GROUP Area : N/A Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Tue Dec 16 06:16:19 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323AD1A1B1E for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:16:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MhRSqvYiKchr for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:16:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod6og101.obsmtp.com (exprod6og101.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0486B1A1AB3 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:16:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com ([72.13.63.41]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob101.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKVJA+rjFsMKbDxLcfV3DfjlfmtqPvVhxu@postini.com; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:16:15 PST Received: from BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexchm01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.255]) by brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id sBGEGDeP024979 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:16:13 -0500 Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:16:13 -0500 From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" To: "provreg@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5731 (4200) Thread-Index: AdAZOtgggWsTMkq+Sdm6tmoKP1OMig== Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:16:12 +0000 Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4954494E@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/provreg/o4Sz0Wxc6xMZa27KcD-cc1JnxHE Subject: [provreg] FW: RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5731 (4200) X-BeenThere: provreg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPP discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:16:17 -0000 My reply... Scott -----Original Message----- From: Hollenbeck, Scott=20 Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 11:20 AM To: RFC Errata System; iesg@ietf.org Cc: bortzmeyer+rfceditor@nic.fr Subject: RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5731 (4200) > -----Original Message----- > From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org] > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 10:55 AM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott; iesg@ietf.org > Cc: bortzmeyer+rfceditor@nic.fr; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org > Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5731 (4200) >=20 > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5731, > "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Domain Name Mapping". >=20 > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3D5731&eid=3D4200 >=20 > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: St=C3=A9phane Bortzmeyer >=20 > Section: 3.2.3 >=20 > Original Text > ------------- > C: 2000-04-03 >=20 > Corrected Text > -------------- > C: 2000-04-03Z >=20 > Notes > ----- > The Z for UTC seems mandatory, per section 2.4 (in XML schema, it is > optional http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/#date ). > Since is the only command with date (and not date-times), one > may think dates are not forced to have a trailing Z but it is not > mentioned in the RFC. This is the text from Section 2.4 of RFC 5731: "The extended date-time form using upper case "T" and "Z" characters define= d in [W3C.REC-xmlschema-2-20041028] MUST be used to represent **date-time**= values, as XML Schema does not support truncated date-time forms or lower = case "T" and "Z" characters." I used "**" to emphasize the requirement in the text for date-time, not dat= e, values. The date in the example is described by the XML Schema date (not= dateTime) data type, which does not require use of the optional time zone.= This isn't explicitly mentioned in RFC 5731 because it is explicitly menti= oned in the normative XML Schema reference. Scott From nobody Thu Dec 18 03:59:53 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944C11A6FA8 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 03:59:51 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cUTBQzRUhyk4 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 03:59:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod6og105.obsmtp.com (exprod6og105.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.189]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 303D41A1BBB for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 03:59:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from brn1lxmailout02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([72.13.63.42]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob105.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKVJLBtDdHSjftV71+zHzMkzpnHRgCgUDJ@postini.com; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 03:59:49 PST Received: from brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.206]) by brn1lxmailout02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id sBIBxl7B018313 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 06:59:47 -0500 Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 06:59:47 -0500 From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" To: "provreg@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Errata Rejected] RFC5731 (4200) Thread-Index: AQHQGkofLTz5NUJJQ0eYhIQRY6CDN5yVP5vw Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:59:46 +0000 Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F49F034BC@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> References: <20141217223742.066EA181243@rfc-editor.org> In-Reply-To: <20141217223742.066EA181243@rfc-editor.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/provreg/hqhDzDvaEY7ubdklfarH4NOIbfA Subject: [provreg] FW: [Errata Rejected] RFC5731 (4200) X-BeenThere: provreg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPP discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:59:51 -0000 FYI Scott -----Original Message----- From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org]=20 Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 5:38 PM To: bortzmeyer+rfceditor@nic.fr; Hollenbeck, Scott Cc: barryleiba@computer.org; iesg@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [Errata Rejected] RFC5731 (4200) The following errata report has been rejected for RFC5731, "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Domain Name Mapping". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3D5731&eid=3D4200 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: St=C3=A9phane Bortzmeyer Date Reported: 2014-12-15 Rejected by: Barry Leiba (IESG) Section: 3.2.3 Original Text ------------- C: 2000-04-03 Corrected Text -------------- C: 2000-04-03Z Notes ----- The Z for UTC seems mandatory, per section 2.4 (in XML schema, it is option= al http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/#date ). Since is the only command with date (and not date-times), one may think dates a= re not forced to have a trailing Z but it is not mentioned in the RFC. Detected by Kim-Minh Kaplan at AFNIC. --VERIFIER NOTES--=20 The RFC could be clearer, but it is consistent that the "Z" is required in = date-time but not on date only. -------------------------------------- RFC5731 (draft-hollenbeck-rfc4931bis-01) -------------------------------------- Title : Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Domain Name Ma= pping Publication Date : August 2009 Author(s) : S. Hollenbeck Category : INTERNET STANDARD Source : IETF - NON WORKING GROUP Area : N/A Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG