Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Timestamp Block - Zero indexing? (#102)

From: Mike Bishop <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 15:21:01 -0800

NumTimestamps is supposed to specify the "total number of pairs following, including the First Timestamp."  If this is zero, presumably the Delta Largest Acked and First Timestamp fields are absent.  If this is one, presumably these fields are present, but no others are.

The *subsequent* fields then say they are repeated "Num Timestamps" times, which contradicts my logic above.  I'm guessing this should actually be "Num Timestamps - 1" times?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/102