Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Handling un-ackable packets (#751)

From: Mike Bishop <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 23:08:51 +0000 (UTC)

The new packet type idea seems like a valid approach -- we already have packets (ab)using the packet number field to echo the received packet number statelessly rather than consuming a packet number on the server side.  (See VN, Stateless Retry.)  Defining an "Unprocessed Data" packet that does the same thing and has no payload would follow the pattern, at least.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/751#issuecomment-327636420