Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] is_retransmittable semantics (#591)

From: ianswett <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 20:10:35 +0000 (UTC)

Agreed that these concepts need to be separated.

I replaced is_retransmittable with is_ack_only in PR #780, because padding is not retransmittable, but does count towards bytes in flight.  My intent is to make everything that is not an ack only packet count towards bytes_in_flight.

But I think there's still some more editorial work to clarify the separation you describe.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/591#issuecomment-330659040