Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless Reset from clients (#466)

From: Martin Thomson <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 16:32:33 -0800

I started writing this up then realized the fatal flaw with the decision we made: the stateless reset token requires confidentiality protection for this to work and the client transport parameters are not confidentiality protected.

Maybe we should reconsider this decision, and - based on our decision to concentrate on our primary application - park this issue.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/466#issuecomment-357819928