Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#989)

From: Brian Trammell <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:38:30 -0800

It would be useful to have a PR for this one. I'm happy to volunteer to put one together, but ISTM that #1043 should land first, as it impacts packet number encoding, how a sender determines which varint size it should use.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/989#issuecomment-356659428