Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Separate QCRAM streams (#1121)

From: afrind <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 13:20:07 -0800

This issue has wandered a bit.  I think the core of it -- moving compression messages off the HTTP control stream and replacing it with 4 unidirectional streams -- is fine.

There are separate issues open for framing on the control stream (#1122) and non-blocking decoder (#1140).

I generated some data about the overhead of framing on the control stream, but I'll put that in the corresponding issue.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1121#issuecomment-371628188