Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Padding ACK-only packets (#837)

From: Christian Huitema <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:08:02 -0700

As long as we agree that Pad does not require Ack, then I am good. I want to be able to Pad an Ack and not trigger Ack of Ack.

I believe the congestion control issue is a red herring. Congestion control is sender elective. If the sender's cc implementation requires acking a padded packet, just insert a ping!

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/837#issuecomment-373140397