Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] register UDP port 443 for HQ? (#1944)

From: Kazuho Oku <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 01:36:59 +0000 (UTC)

Do we need to state in the IANA Considerations section of the HTTP draft that UDP port 443 will be registered for HQ? Or is that implied even though not explicitly stated?

I ask this because even in the case where the browsers would use alt-svc based upgrades (at least for the short term), applications that use HTTP for specific purpose can be more aggressive in requiring HQ support on the server side. They could just mandate HQ support or do happy eyeballing. Using HQ from the first request would be beneficial from both performance and security perspectives.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1944