Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest acked in ACK frame MUST NOT decrease (#2205)

From: ianswett <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 07:17:22 -0700

We're in the process of making our implementation accept smaller largest_acked values, so I'm wonder if we're any closer to consensus(one way or the other) on this issue?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2205#issuecomment-472438462