Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only feedback loop in recovery instead of transport (#1860)

From: ianswett <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 03:08:54 -0700

Agreement from London was to move as much as possible to transport, and cite transport when possible.

Martin suggested almost all of section 4 can be moved: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-recovery-20#section-4

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1860#issuecomment-495156079