Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss requirement that connection IDs not be correlatable (#2084)

From: martinduke <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:15:06 -0700

I believe this is an editorial issue, not design. We all know what we mean: it can encode information by use for itself and trusted intermediaries, but definitely is not correlatable. I agree that MUST is a little tricky unless we are mandating either true encryption or true randomness, which is a discussion I was hoping to defer until QUIC-LB is adopted.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2084#issuecomment-514366581