Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify when it is ok to ignore packet loss (#3456)

From: ianswett <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 14:36:01 -0800

Currently, the "Ignoring Loss of Undecryptable Packets" section indicates that some loss can be ignored, but now that we have multiple packet number spaces, I think we can constrain the set of ignorable losses to those below the smallest acknowledged packet in a packet number space.

Ignoring the loss of a subsequently sent packet was not the intent.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3456