From jouni.nospam@gmail.com Thu May 2 01:09:24 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD6A21F8E5D for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 01:09:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xBRvQ1BkKSeB for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 01:09:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ee0-f42.google.com (mail-ee0-f42.google.com [74.125.83.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C296C21F856D for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 01:09:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ee0-f42.google.com with SMTP id c13so128501eek.15 for ; Thu, 02 May 2013 01:09:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date :references:to:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=0JBG8bUT/GcZnK6/Wx1kWCgaPxJdcdAmMNz3k7iv8Ck=; b=odx5pmbtWo8mv6jjKOdDfaqfDzGCm6aDgR0rqVs5yqQ8k1OyiWWqT7m0mwl/gKYrDC gCrYqxihQrDdfj1NmqCQRhZsg2LUjYP5YnrvV2nDsujwcR19zBQch9rRjIU075hZcz2X oMEHbjWHNx2t8ZvB12d94qEAvvTsRhOQ5u4vU4qIb0Sn+JgdpMydu4PI+f62uZ1ct8fL T2xNQFSeV5CwmC4/lSZcHEDDUHB6WWQBX9Sai5YwtdkypX6PDBB7nWyFGw8JresW8Ssk oyjOAl2Dx6PnGJImJC/LbQwXIzjgHiYkYYIDrDZ0Ib1i+rmF/OSowXmxUK6VXXDwmNCt NeTw== X-Received: by 10.15.67.203 with SMTP id u51mr16957645eex.22.1367482155814; Thu, 02 May 2013 01:09:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [188.117.15.108] ([188.117.15.108]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cd3sm8017906eeb.6.2013.05.02.01.09.14 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 02 May 2013 01:09:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Jouni Korhonen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 11:09:33 +0300 References: <20130501053042.6510062114@rfc-editor.org> To: "radext@ietf.org" Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) Subject: [radext] New RFC 6929 on Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) Protocol Extensions X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 08:09:24 -0000 Congratulations for the authors and the WG for completing this very much needed RFC! - Jouni & Mauricio Begin forwarded message: > From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org > Subject: RFC 6929 on Remote Authentication Dial In User Service = (RADIUS) Protocol Extensions > Date: May 1, 2013 8:30:42 AM GMT+03:00 > To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org > Cc: radext@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org >=20 > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. >=20 >=20 > RFC 6929 >=20 > Title: Remote Authentication Dial In User=20 > Service (RADIUS) Protocol Extensions=20 > Author: A. DeKok, A. Lior > Status: Standards Track > Stream: IETF > Date: April 2013 > Mailbox: aland@networkradius.com,=20 > avi.ietf@lior.org > Pages: 68 > Characters: 133099 > Updates: RFC 2865, RFC 3575, RFC 6158 >=20 > I-D Tag: draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-13.txt >=20 > URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6929.txt >=20 > The Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) protocol is > nearing exhaustion of its current 8-bit Attribute Type space. In > addition, experience shows a growing need for complex grouping, along > with attributes that can carry more than 253 octets of data. This > document defines changes to RADIUS that address all of the above > problems. >=20 > This document is a product of the RADIUS EXTensions Working Group of = the IETF. >=20 From jouni.nospam@gmail.com Thu May 2 01:26:02 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95CA721F85ED for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 01:26:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.36 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.36 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, SARE_LWSHORTT=1.24] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N09UH9lfyMzc for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 01:26:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ea0-x235.google.com (mail-ea0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD4021F8519 for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 01:26:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ea0-f181.google.com with SMTP id a11so133803eae.26 for ; Thu, 02 May 2013 01:25:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=2aFdFFTPRJ37idwudrmGl06Y6d4oJb4RVwIEVTtBmgY=; b=IYA+3xVCq9lhXcXKi+kWHd3n4Do7AnLiBd78S8tSQXm0fT0ayeIkGuZ6wfoj8IKP3S 1p+Ju05CjahHBBL7L8MjVChP5qK1Tt/xeRO4VWLtIC3cmj0DinO3/IL4+gJNjCkuc7bE 90CmmYP9VPztlfSGpD9iCaMCa5Bw2hAvQHb1GTSAFsWRCxv8ZeR1e+aDHHnhSUoDejmF 9BQomNZuBAq9z/KLS871p4rBy66nnRfLesxK26yR2abZT/qhz4n6Au36qA8OBnl7HZeu pdsOnH2jWajHabDZtj0gopKAEC2c35NrIqWVWqJ677OJ55txO501080Xa1lWmD5KBhjT fkSA== X-Received: by 10.14.213.67 with SMTP id z43mr17009598eeo.16.1367483151613; Thu, 02 May 2013 01:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:1bc8:101:f101:883f:3df4:1943:952c? ([2001:1bc8:101:f101:883f:3df4:1943:952c]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r10sm8069138eez.10.2013.05.02.01.25.49 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 02 May 2013 01:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) From: Jouni Korhonen In-Reply-To: <517FBD04.1050009@deployingradius.com> Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 11:26:08 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <516EA97E.2000005@deployingradius.com> <0E1BBA4B-1985-43C3-800A-AF336CABEF30@gmail.com> <517FBD04.1050009@deployingradius.com> To: Alan DeKok X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) Cc: radext@ietf.org, Jouni Korhonen , "Joseph Salowey \(jsalowey\)" Subject: Re: [radext] New DTLS document X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 08:26:02 -0000 On Apr 30, 2013, at 3:45 PM, Alan DeKok = wrote: > Jouni Korhonen wrote: >> Thanks Joe for detailed comments. Just few generic questions to the = WG. >>=20 >> 1) Do you agree with Joe's suggestion to use the same port as RADSEC: >>=20 >> radius-dtls 2083/udp RADIUS over DTLS [RFCTBD] >=20 > I'm OK with it. So we have an agreement here. >> 2) Do you think Joe's concern on Section 5.1.2 "disambiguation = recommendation" >> is something that need to be reconsidered..=20 >=20 > I would prefer to avoid that. The document makes it clear that this > is a temporary measure which should not be used long-term >=20 > If the WG says the disambiguation is bad, then the preferred approach > would be to remove it entirely from the document. There is precedent > for protocol disambiguation, but most protocols simply allocate a new = port. >=20 > The suggestion to encapsulate RADIUS inside of RADIUS opens the > document up *completely*. It means we'd have to spend another 3 years > discussing the details. And a better alternative exists: use a new = port. >=20 > I'm very opposed to RADIUS encapsulation. I see nothing good coming > from it. I'm similarly opposed to a "new" header for RADIUS over DTLS > over port 1812. The resulting packet isn't RADIUS, and won't pass > RADIUS sanity checks for application-layer firewalls. >=20 > If you're going to design a new protocol, the only reasonable thing = to > do is to use a new port. >=20 My take is that we should not go for the RADIUS encapsulation or the new = header. I would be ok to remove Section 5.1.2 entirely. However, if WG wants to = keep Section 5.1.2 I would add a note there that it is intended to be a short = term=20 migration solution and can be turned off at some point of time. = Implementations and deployments are encouraged to switch to the RADIUS-DTLS port as soon = as possible. Would that be OK for the WG? - Jouni > Alan DeKok. From internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu May 2 05:11:37 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB97F21F99CF; Thu, 2 May 2013 05:11:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.571 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.571 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nIHbyXgX+Rsp; Thu, 2 May 2013 05:11:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE9D21F99B2; Thu, 2 May 2013 05:11:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.44.p4 Message-ID: <20130502121132.23700.94226.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 05:11:32 -0700 Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-06.txt X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 12:11:37 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the RADIUS EXTensions Working Group of the IE= TF. Title : RADIUS Attributes for IEEE 802 Networks Author(s) : Bernard Aboba Jouni Malinen Paul Congdon Joseph Salowey Mark Jones Filename : draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-06.txt Pages : 29 Date : 2013-05-02 Abstract: RFC 3580 provides guidelines for the use of the Remote Authentication Dialin User Service (RADIUS) within IEEE 802 local area networks (LANs). This document proposes additional attributes for use within IEEE 802 networks, as well as clarifications on the usage of the EAP- Key-Name attribute, updating RFC 4072. The attributes defined in this document are usable both within RADIUS and Diameter. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-06 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-06 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From aland@deployingradius.com Thu May 2 09:04:16 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBC921F8FF2 for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 09:04:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.979 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.620, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_LWSHORTT=1.24, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TmL-HWUCArEa for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 09:04:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from power.freeradius.org (power.freeradius.org [88.190.25.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C74D21F8FF1 for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 09:04:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by power.freeradius.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B912240E2B; Thu, 2 May 2013 18:04:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at power.freeradius.org Received: from power.freeradius.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (power.freeradius.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oEKuNGn4dn50; Thu, 2 May 2013 18:04:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Thor-2.local (bas1-ottawa11-1176121151.dsl.bell.ca [70.26.47.63]) by power.freeradius.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B6BE2240297; Thu, 2 May 2013 18:04:08 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <51828E77.9020303@deployingradius.com> Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 12:04:07 -0400 From: Alan DeKok User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jouni Korhonen References: <516EA97E.2000005@deployingradius.com> <0E1BBA4B-1985-43C3-800A-AF336CABEF30@gmail.com> <517FBD04.1050009@deployingradius.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: radext@ietf.org, "Joseph Salowey \(jsalowey\)" Subject: Re: [radext] New DTLS document X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 16:04:16 -0000 Jouni Korhonen wrote: > I would be ok to remove Section 5.1.2 entirely. Which means that the rest of the document needs to be updated, too. It talks about accepting UDP and DTLS on the same port. Section 5.1.2 is only *justification* for why that works. The other sections say *how* it's supposed to work. i.e. Deleting 5.1.2 means we'd have to delete more than half of Section 3, too. > However, if WG wants to keep > Section 5.1.2 I would add a note there that it is intended to be a short term > migration solution and can be turned off at some point of time. Implementations > and deployments are encouraged to switch to the RADIUS-DTLS port as soon as > possible. Would that be OK for the WG? I already added that in the latest rev. See Section 3: This section describes how clients and servers should transition to DTLS. There is a fair amount of discussion around this transition, as it is critical to get it correct. We expect that once implementations have transitioned to RADIUS/DTLS, the text in this section will no longer be relevant. If we're just going to turn off UDP, we don't need any transition path. We just break the network, and let everyone figure out what to do. The whole point of the text in Section 3 is to document how the transition path is handled. Including (if so desired) accepting UDP and DTLS on the same port. I can add duplicate text in Section 5.1.2. But the idea is for people to read the *entire* document, and act on it as a whole. Alan DeKok. From jouni.nospam@gmail.com Thu May 2 11:50:30 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79AB121F91CF for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 11:50:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.419 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.419 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_LWSHORTT=1.24] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sAcnLpLpG1Y7 for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 11:50:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ee0-f45.google.com (mail-ee0-f45.google.com [74.125.83.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB3E21F8F2C for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 11:49:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ee0-f45.google.com with SMTP id l10so450939eei.32 for ; Thu, 02 May 2013 11:49:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=x74Y2t0avTYsJEeS8yYvDiOWIHtrjRAJqHRtcYureyY=; b=dArXbrTulY8pGKwPlVNhvkt45WTKCeuN+mlOQ0xSAL6rA8YJc8ETi95Qk5oJm6z7PP /Gy5uyX/RKHngSJ7ktTDog3eWOwVQKIOF7xl2T9+OL60Xnu7w/vIp7QiIeh/GgoWWe6D FKOapqGCqzFeSF73x6zVhoeCH8fLfK5ZL3v55GOZFbjtz/ezMhT2rm2PmbNRP/czgWWe xXYjaDMigvYuIFftbJRd5gXv+qoH4Z3FGnCjUDh6KdwjOHoPzswjco4aJVHjIXYmhffO TRHDIOfu4j3H3zWr5zJZ5BLxAqxPEXGVTcDiHa9kgsuLHrBUOCyDZCdaWh5zkooMp/4w UeZg== X-Received: by 10.14.127.5 with SMTP id c5mr5159752eei.45.1367520597311; Thu, 02 May 2013 11:49:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:1bc8:101:f101:95cd:56f2:ac38:2503? ([2001:1bc8:101:f101:95cd:56f2:ac38:2503]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bp51sm9481576eeb.5.2013.05.02.11.49.55 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 02 May 2013 11:49:56 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) From: Jouni Korhonen In-Reply-To: <51828E77.9020303@deployingradius.com> Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 21:49:53 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <061B9149-3354-4E53-8721-FCD86BF03EF0@gmail.com> References: <516EA97E.2000005@deployingradius.com> <0E1BBA4B-1985-43C3-800A-AF336CABEF30@gmail.com> <517FBD04.1050009@deployingradius.com> <51828E77.9020303@deployingradius.com> To: Alan DeKok X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) Cc: radext@ietf.org, Jouni Korhonen , "Joseph Salowey \(jsalowey\)" Subject: Re: [radext] New DTLS document X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 18:50:30 -0000 Hi, On May 2, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Alan DeKok = wrote: > Jouni Korhonen wrote: >> I would be ok to remove Section 5.1.2 entirely. >=20 > Which means that the rest of the document needs to be updated, too. > It talks about accepting UDP and DTLS on the same port. Section 5.1.2 > is only *justification* for why that works. The other sections say > *how* it's supposed to work. >=20 > i.e. Deleting 5.1.2 means we'd have to delete more than half of > Section 3, too. That would be a side effect of this approach. However, most folks (including me) seems to be okish keeping the current text as well. So it would be Joe's voice that counts here now. >> However, if WG wants to keep >> Section 5.1.2 I would add a note there that it is intended to be a = short term=20 >> migration solution and can be turned off at some point of time. = Implementations >> and deployments are encouraged to switch to the RADIUS-DTLS port as = soon as >> possible. Would that be OK for the WG? >=20 > I already added that in the latest rev. See Section 3: >=20 > This section describes how clients and servers should transition to > DTLS. There is a fair amount of discussion around this transition, > as it is critical to get it correct. We expect that once > implementations have transitioned to RADIUS/DTLS, the text in this > section will no longer be relevant. >=20 > If we're just going to turn off UDP, we don't need any transition > path. We just break the network, and let everyone figure out what to = do. >=20 > The whole point of the text in Section 3 is to document how the > transition path is handled. Including (if so desired) accepting UDP = and > DTLS on the same port. >=20 > I can add duplicate text in Section 5.1.2. But the idea is for = people > to read the *entire* document, and act on it as a whole. No need to duplicate. A pointer back to Section 3 would definitely=20 suffice. - Jouni >=20 > Alan DeKok. From jouni.nospam@gmail.com Thu May 2 12:02:51 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6223D21F93B7 for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 12:02:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UFM55fSDdAxx for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 12:02:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ee0-f42.google.com (mail-ee0-f42.google.com [74.125.83.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D15D21F9381 for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 12:02:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ee0-f42.google.com with SMTP id c13so434781eek.15 for ; Thu, 02 May 2013 12:02:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject :message-id:date:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=ybE8Hp1cjZd7jxukH3cN811MXrYJKBgEWqGNwr7kdi0=; b=ZcVM9xgzM0Q8jdGPTnJXo2kgqeW79wRPxBdV8jzUolzSF1lQ39ZVEGkhCa8q0enzle 5C92b1zrsgBFTEw7f43vhJWlQtxDpVB42TYippOStamOPtYmfwPeQSaMV3SI88bKiDGb hmSAK6ILpDhF7HraztQTG/xmlqZOf6DaH8lKUg1cwUxFPZJid859K4SRF7ubqkhSa6io sQPXAlsSn7300sDsSz9CfYXmq+bvyMYJhhXHgie4snQwdfIyF3PhvcVx0zrarS4+s/kD X/EJdlgHS/X1KGyKduQaVC6KrApxxEdqCb8l0SK0S7FFd5WQPFEgc57AjtGz/fLnqZ4l A19w== X-Received: by 10.14.208.132 with SMTP id q4mr14262694eeo.35.1367521364449; Thu, 02 May 2013 12:02:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [188.117.15.108] ([188.117.15.108]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bn53sm11457104eeb.7.2013.05.02.12.02.42 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 02 May 2013 12:02:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Jouni Korhonen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 22:02:41 +0300 To: "radext@ietf.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) Subject: [radext] WGLC #3 for draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-06 X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 19:02:51 -0000 Folks, There were some comments and substantial edits on the = draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext since the -04 version. Therefore we think it is better to have yet another = WGLC. This email starts a quick one week WGLC #3 for "RADIUS Attributes for = IEEE 802 Networks" I-D (draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-06). The WGLC ends 9-May-2013. Send = your comments to the mailer and please also use the IssueTracker. No comments would this = time also imply that everybody agrees with the content. - Jouni & Mauricio From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Thu May 2 12:51:06 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FBBC21F8F0F for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 12:51:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id koGiRxLXWYEy for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 12:51:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA0C21F8EF7 for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 12:51:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57653 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UXzWr-0007A9-A7; Thu, 02 May 2013 21:50:57 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 19:50:57 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/150 Message-ID: <066.e919bac78e4db075aee7612e6b79bbc9@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 150 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, j@w1.fi, jsalowey@cisco.com, mark@azu.ca, paul_congdon@hp.com Resent-Message-Id: <20130502195104.BEA0C21F8EF7@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 12:51:04 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] #150: OUI and Suite Type Reference X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 19:51:06 -0000 #150: OUI and Suite Type Reference The following sections refer to the OUI and Suite Type fields in IEEE 802.11, but do not include explicit references: 2.15 WLAN-Pairwise-Cipher 2.16 WLAN-Group-Cipher 2.17 WLAN-AKM-Suite 2.18 WLAN-Group-Mgmt-Cipher Fix: In Section 2.15, Value text should read: Value The Value field is four octets, containing a 32-bit unsigned integer, formatted as specified in Figure 8-187 within Section 8.4.2.27.2 of [IEEE-802.11], with values of OUI and Suite Type drawn from Table 8-99. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | OUI | Suite Type | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ In Section 2.16, Value text should read: Value The Value field is four octets, containing a 32-bit unsigned integer, formatted as specified in Figure 8-187 within Section 8.4.2.27.2 of [IEEE-802.11], with values of OUI and Suite Type drawn from Table 8-99. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | OUI | Suite Type | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ In Section 2.17, Value text should read: Value The Value field is four octets, containing a 32-bit unsigned integer, formatted as specified in Figure 8-187 within Section 8.4.2.27.2 of [IEEE-802.11], with values of OUI and Suite Type drawn from Table 8-101. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | OUI | Suite Type | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ In Section 2.18, Value text should read: Value The Value field is four octets, containing a 32-bit unsigned integer, formatted as specified in Figure 8-187 within Section 8.4.2.27.2 of [IEEE-802.11], with values of OUI and Suite Type drawn from Table 8-99. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | OUI | Suite Type | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: milestone1 Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 Severity: In WG Last Call | Keywords: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Thu May 2 13:09:41 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66BAD21F8E6A for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 13:09:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NAL7mEsXw0Ma for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 13:09:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B41521F8E5A for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 13:09:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59511 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UXzos-0001aC-Mf; Thu, 02 May 2013 22:09:34 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 20:09:34 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/150#comment:1 Message-ID: <081.3085ce2f1b32e4b58a262118361e451e@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.e919bac78e4db075aee7612e6b79bbc9@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 150 In-Reply-To: <066.e919bac78e4db075aee7612e6b79bbc9@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, j@w1.fi, jsalowey@cisco.com, mark@azu.ca, paul_congdon@hp.com Resent-Message-Id: <20130502200940.8B41521F8E5A@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 13:09:40 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #150: OUI and Suite Type Reference X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 20:09:41 -0000 #150: OUI and Suite Type Reference Comment (by bernard_aboba@hotmail.com): within IEEE 802.11, the term "Suite type" is used, rather than "Suite Type". Also, Figure 8-187 defines the "Suite selector format". So an amended fix is as follows (leaving out the diagrams): In Section 2.15, Value text should read: Value The Value field is four octets, containing a 32-bit unsigned integer, in Suite selector format as specified in Figure 8-187 within Section 8.4.2.27.2 of [IEEE-802.11], with values of OUI and Suite type drawn from Table 8-99. In Section 2.16, Value text should read: Value The Value field is four octets, containing a 32-bit unsigned integer, in Suite selector format as specified in Figure 8-187 within Section 8.4.2.27.2 of [IEEE-802.11], with values of OUI and Suite type drawn from Table 8-99. In Section 2.17, Value text should read: Value The Value field is four octets, containing a 32-bit unsigned integer, in Suite selector format as specified in Figure 8-187 within Section 8.4.2.27.2 of [IEEE-802.11], with values of OUI and Suite type drawn from Table 8-101. In Section 2.18, Value text should read: Value The Value field is four octets, containing a 32-bit unsigned integer, in Suite selector format as specified in Figure 8-187 within Section 8.4.2.27.2 of [IEEE-802.11], with values of OUI and Suite type drawn from Table 8-99. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: milestone1 Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 Severity: In WG Last Call | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Sat May 4 15:40:02 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8147121F87D2 for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 15:40:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MSPG0VjvMPVt for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 15:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F3321F86CE for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 15:39:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51706 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UYl7I-0005Jh-Om; Sun, 05 May 2013 00:39:44 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 22:39:44 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://ebook.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/151 Message-ID: <066.98573781c9998b5674844b4dec7833b8@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 151 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, j@w1.fi, jsalowey@cisco.com, mark@azu.ca, paul_congdon@hp.com Resent-Message-Id: <20130504224001.C3F3321F86CE@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 15:39:58 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] #151: Section 2.9: WLAN-SSID Attribute in Access-Accept X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 22:40:02 -0000 #151: Section 2.9: WLAN-SSID Attribute in Access-Accept The WLAN-SSID attribute contains the Service Set Identifier (SSID) which identifies a specific 802.11 extended service set (ESS). A single WLAN-SSID Attribute is permitted within an Access-Accept or Accounting-Request packet. [BA] It is not clear what the meaning is when a WLAN-SSID Attribute is included in an Access-Accept. What if the WLAN-SSID value is different from that in the Access-Request? -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: critical | Milestone: milestone1 Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 Severity: In WG Last Call | Keywords: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Sat May 4 15:42:25 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F1B21F9688 for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 15:42:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zw06hyBaPPel for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 15:42:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1068121F9653 for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 15:42:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51871 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UYl9n-0006LH-BZ; Sun, 05 May 2013 00:42:19 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 22:42:19 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://svn.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/151#comment:1 Message-ID: <081.e62c8f365fd08e6f395807f5637f1415@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.98573781c9998b5674844b4dec7833b8@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 151 In-Reply-To: <066.98573781c9998b5674844b4dec7833b8@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, j@w1.fi, jsalowey@cisco.com, mark@azu.ca, paul_congdon@hp.com Resent-Message-Id: <20130504224225.1068121F9653@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 15:42:25 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #151: Section 2.9: WLAN-SSID Attribute in Access-Accept X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 22:42:25 -0000 #151: Section 2.9: WLAN-SSID Attribute in Access-Accept Comment (by bernard_aboba@hotmail.com): [BA] I believe it should say "within an Access-Request or Accounting- Request packet" -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: critical | Milestone: milestone1 Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 Severity: In WG Last Call | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Sat May 4 15:48:06 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E645321F969C for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 15:48:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tlj-WT9ncC-f for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 15:48:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4135721F9697 for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 15:48:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52323 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UYlFI-0008Pn-6E; Sun, 05 May 2013 00:48:01 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 22:48:00 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://ebook.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/152 Message-ID: <066.b9edaeb6aac9f234a16b0c5c0347d559@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 152 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, j@w1.fi, jsalowey@cisco.com, mark@azu.ca, paul_congdon@hp.com Resent-Message-Id: <20130504224806.4135721F9697@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 15:48:06 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] #152: Section 2.7: Network-Id-Name X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 22:48:07 -0000 #152: Section 2.7: Network-Id-Name Zero or one Network-Id-Name Attribute is permitted within a RADIUS Access-Request or Accounting-Request packet. When included within an Access-Request packet, the Network-Id-Name Attribute represents a hint of the NID-Name to which the Supplicant should be granted access. In order to indicate which network names the Supplicant is permitted to access, the Allowed-Called-Station-Id Attribute is provided within an Access-Accept. When included within an Accounting-Request packet, the Network-Id-Name Attribute represents the NID-Name to which the Supplicant has been granted access. [BA] Should a Network-Id-Name attribute be allowed in an Access-Accept in order to permit the RADIUS server to determine what NID-Name the supplicant is given access to after authentication? -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: critical | Milestone: milestone1 Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 Severity: In WG Last Call | Keywords: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Sat May 4 16:00:19 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F4B21F96FA for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 15:59:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kQ30rEdheSYT for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 15:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E508021F9697 for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 15:52:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52486 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UYlJR-0001Y7-JP; Sun, 05 May 2013 00:52:17 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 22:52:17 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/153 Message-ID: <066.e99973544c7878635851fd28a6cf5689@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 153 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, j@w1.fi, jsalowey@cisco.com, mark@azu.ca, paul_congdon@hp.com Resent-Message-Id: <20130504225302.E508021F9697@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 15:52:22 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 23:02:05 -0000 #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info The Access-Info Attribute is utilized by implementations of IEEE-802.1X [IEEE-802.1X] to specify the Access status information field within an Access Information Type Length Value Tuple (TLV) to be sent to the user within MACsec Key Agreement (MKA) or EAPoL- Announcement frames. A single Access-Info Attribute is permitted within a RADIUS Access-Accept, Access-Challenge, Access-Reject or Accounting- Request packet. [BA] The above paragraph seems to imply that the Access-Info Attribute could cause the Access status information to change during and after authentication. It is unclear how supplicants would respond to such a change. For example, the potential response to a change in MKA (which is authenticated) could be quite different from a change in an EAPoL- Announcement frame (which is not). As a result, the desired behavior is unclear. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: critical | Milestone: milestone1 Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 Severity: In WG Last Call | Keywords: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Sat May 4 16:06:37 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F4621F8477 for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 16:06:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aKCIGu9hJB4W for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 16:06:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E508021F9697 for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 15:52:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52486 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UYlJR-0001Y7-JP; Sun, 05 May 2013 00:52:17 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 22:52:17 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/153 Message-ID: <066.e99973544c7878635851fd28a6cf5689@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 153 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, j@w1.fi, jsalowey@cisco.com, mark@azu.ca, paul_congdon@hp.com Resent-Message-Id: <20130504225302.E508021F9697@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 15:52:22 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 23:06:37 -0000 #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info The Access-Info Attribute is utilized by implementations of IEEE-802.1X [IEEE-802.1X] to specify the Access status information field within an Access Information Type Length Value Tuple (TLV) to be sent to the user within MACsec Key Agreement (MKA) or EAPoL- Announcement frames. A single Access-Info Attribute is permitted within a RADIUS Access-Accept, Access-Challenge, Access-Reject or Accounting- Request packet. [BA] The above paragraph seems to imply that the Access-Info Attribute could cause the Access status information to change during and after authentication. It is unclear how supplicants would respond to such a change. For example, the potential response to a change in MKA (which is authenticated) could be quite different from a change in an EAPoL- Announcement frame (which is not). As a result, the desired behavior is unclear. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: critical | Milestone: milestone1 Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 Severity: In WG Last Call | Keywords: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Sat May 4 16:12:29 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F0521F96BA for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 16:12:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vgUUgcPSQ-ht for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 16:12:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF3F21F96C1 for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 15:54:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52517 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UYlL7-0006eF-IU; Sun, 05 May 2013 00:54:01 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 22:54:01 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/154 Message-ID: <066.af76bbaafebb5387ac74455296968a5c@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 154 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, j@w1.fi, jsalowey@cisco.com, mark@azu.ca, paul_congdon@hp.com Resent-Message-Id: <20130504225420.DEF3F21F96C1@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 15:54:15 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] #154: Section 2.10 WLAN-HESSID X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 23:12:29 -0000 #154: Section 2.10 WLAN-HESSID The WLAN-HESSID attribute contains a MAC address that identifies the Homogenous Extended Service Set. The HESSID is a globally unique identifier that in conjunction with the WLAN-SSID, may be used to provide network identification for a subscription service provider network (SSPN), as described in Section 8.4.2.94 of [IEEE-802.11]. A single WLAN-HESSID Attribute is permitted within an Access-Accept or Accounting-Request packet. [BA] The above text does not make it clear what a RADIUS client is supposed to do on receipt of a WLAN-HESSID within an Access-Accept. Also, why would a WLAN-HESSID not be permitted within an Access-Request? -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: critical | Milestone: milestone1 Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 Severity: In WG Last Call | Keywords: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Sat May 4 16:12:31 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188DB21F96C4 for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 16:12:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T0YvkezdntSs for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 16:12:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF1C21F9602 for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 15:58:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52622 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UYlOu-0004IT-Uu; Sun, 05 May 2013 00:57:56 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 22:57:56 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://svn.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/155 Message-ID: <066.785a2f9012d700a58500e4fa1af7b98e@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 155 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, j@w1.fi, jsalowey@cisco.com, mark@azu.ca, paul_congdon@hp.com Resent-Message-Id: <20130504225839.ABF1C21F9602@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 15:58:18 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] #155: Section 2.11 WLAN-Venue-Info X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 23:12:31 -0000 #155: Section 2.11 WLAN-Venue-Info No text is provided indicating what RADIUS packets WLAN-Venue-Info may be included in. To harmonize the text with the Table in Section 3, the following change is recommended: Zero or more WLAN-Venue-Info attributes may be included in an Access- Request or Accounting-Request. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: critical | Milestone: milestone1 Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 Severity: In WG Last Call | Keywords: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From jsalowey@cisco.com Mon May 6 16:57:42 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDE221F936F for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 16:57:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GgR2vdmr3ghR for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 16:57:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29A121F9361 for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 16:57:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1718; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1367884658; x=1369094258; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=r6hV+sZcbFodvIctlG/dxmRUu0JFslLKZ/6OqHph/4I=; b=dDneZ3PnMiwJ8zDyxKmryx7LqTpwmcDSGK+fddACkQ/NJVkWZn8/VI8F JhiasOkIz/HqfnF0e4EtgptdgT2GE4dkuYR1Uy/t/oWSCNP8eIOgT6FMi PqxTh0j4jfS0nk2/EhyvHCxz61ZD4xC0TCfpIXjeX0pEN9uPNysCfMEO3 k=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjwFAKpCiFGtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABQgwc3rHOSFYEJFnSCIAEBBDo/EAIBCCIUEDIlAgQOBQiHcgMPDMBqjFuBLnUCMQdkgg5hA5NfgWyDCYptA4UegwANgic X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,624,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="207132846" Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 May 2013 23:57:37 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r46Nvb4C025760 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 6 May 2013 23:57:37 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.125]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 6 May 2013 18:57:37 -0500 From: "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" To: "" Thread-Topic: [radext] #152: Section 2.7: Network-Id-Name Thread-Index: AQHOSRlwUzroOh+NnkarBPcZMDChj5j5LJUA Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 23:57:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: <066.b9edaeb6aac9f234a16b0c5c0347d559@trac.tools.ietf.org> In-Reply-To: <066.b9edaeb6aac9f234a16b0c5c0347d559@trac.tools.ietf.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.33.248.202] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <6510F5FA3601B34FAD1F7930E8283A70@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "" , "" Subject: Re: [radext] #152: Section 2.7: Network-Id-Name X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 23:57:42 -0000 On May 4, 2013, at 3:48 PM, radext issue tracker wrote: > #152: Section 2.7: Network-Id-Name >=20 > Zero or one Network-Id-Name Attribute is permitted within a RADIUS > Access-Request or Accounting-Request packet. When included within > an Access-Request packet, the Network-Id-Name Attribute represents > a hint of the NID-Name to which the Supplicant should be granted > access. In order to indicate which network names the Supplicant > is permitted to access, the Allowed-Called-Station-Id Attribute is > provided within an Access-Accept. When included within an > Accounting-Request packet, the Network-Id-Name Attribute > represents the NID-Name to which the Supplicant has been granted > access. >=20 > [BA] Should a Network-Id-Name attribute be allowed in an Access-Accept in > order to permit the RADIUS server to determine what NID-Name the > supplicant is given access to after authentication? >=20 [Joe] Yes. > --=20 > -------------------------------------+-----------------------------------= -- > Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- > bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org > Type: defect | Status: new > Priority: critical | Milestone: milestone1 > Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 > Severity: In WG Last Call | Keywords: > -------------------------------------+-----------------------------------= -- >=20 > Ticket URL: > radext >=20 From jsalowey@cisco.com Mon May 6 16:58:46 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F0421F936F for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 16:58:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dv+fvgOAgjsw for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 16:58:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED2D721F9361 for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 16:58:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1148; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1367884722; x=1369094322; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=fwB/ThVi0gNq87RB4vua+lCZwEK60hsPhWWyAIEo15I=; b=JE3UdISICXvV0qMSCZSAeXxvOXnF0pgYzYUnTk6+oRYBG1ohdwml+a3u 0ZERtrkZqR/spBp6vvnoZjKzKnT3YfzG7zwiUQw0XR9t47XrO8YVxmNBP NnPW5SDbDrB1VQYzTH9diNreSLO0CO/Lv84JWvhRp+X2THezsA2ovKIz7 4=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjwFAFtDiFGtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABQgwc3rHOSFYEJFnSCIAEBBDo/EAIBCCIUEDIlAgQOBQiHcgMPDMBqjFuBLnUCMQdkgg5hA5VLgwmIeYF0A4UegwANgic X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,624,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="204135107" Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 May 2013 23:58:40 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r46NweFv025073 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 6 May 2013 23:58:40 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.125]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 6 May 2013 18:58:39 -0500 From: "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" To: "" Thread-Topic: [radext] #155: Section 2.11 WLAN-Venue-Info Thread-Index: AQHOSRrTDdHwTpHNGEOOxW6KzaCEopj5LN2A Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 23:58:39 +0000 Message-ID: References: <066.785a2f9012d700a58500e4fa1af7b98e@trac.tools.ietf.org> In-Reply-To: <066.785a2f9012d700a58500e4fa1af7b98e@trac.tools.ietf.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.33.248.202] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "" , "" Subject: Re: [radext] #155: Section 2.11 WLAN-Venue-Info X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 23:58:46 -0000 On May 4, 2013, at 3:57 PM, radext issue tracker wrote: > #155: Section 2.11 WLAN-Venue-Info >=20 > No text is provided indicating what RADIUS packets WLAN-Venue-Info may be > included in. To harmonize the text with the Table in Section 3, the > following change is recommended: >=20 > Zero or more WLAN-Venue-Info attributes may be included in an Access- > Request or Accounting-Request. >=20 [Joe] Makes sense.=20 > --=20 > -------------------------------------+-----------------------------------= -- > Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- > bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org > Type: defect | Status: new > Priority: critical | Milestone: milestone1 > Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 > Severity: In WG Last Call | Keywords: > -------------------------------------+-----------------------------------= -- >=20 > Ticket URL: > radext >=20 From jsalowey@cisco.com Mon May 6 17:03:49 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E505D21F9180 for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 17:03:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AczzRqGTYU3V for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 17:03:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F22321F9121 for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 17:03:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1067; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1367885025; x=1369094625; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=v0CeutjJyyn5CFkVU1EP+2fBxWKsUlGGkz0pjbZsMQg=; b=Ij0xhEvLyWz127KUgrQtzZO7JuQU36QkO+ITWO0k6iylc/vl56AXcFVl XT9FHAef8WVCHs1vrKRaUCB5VQPapWUIHjCkW5kN1q/P1j6B2EUEm+aGQ F4ujwOEzUeozd6hDn271SLTcnKCNm32/VP21ThHFhmmCC9lICoLom+qXk 0=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AosFABdEiFGtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABQgwc3gnWpfpIVgQkWdIIgAQEEOj8QAgEIIhQQMiUCBA4FCIdyAw8MsjmOL4xbgS51AjEHgnJhA5VLgwmKbQOFHoMNgic X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,624,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="207134158" Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 May 2013 00:03:44 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com [173.36.12.79]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4703iTs031047 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 7 May 2013 00:03:44 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.125]) by xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com ([173.36.12.79]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 6 May 2013 19:03:43 -0500 From: "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" To: "" Thread-Topic: [radext] #151: Section 2.9: WLAN-SSID Attribute in Access-Accept Thread-Index: AQHOSRhLOLAVMNCJ0kS+Tmr3iajoBJj18uWAgAM7aIA= Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 00:03:44 +0000 Message-ID: References: <066.98573781c9998b5674844b4dec7833b8@trac.tools.ietf.org> <081.e62c8f365fd08e6f395807f5637f1415@trac.tools.ietf.org> In-Reply-To: <081.e62c8f365fd08e6f395807f5637f1415@trac.tools.ietf.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.33.248.202] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <86E6936C83FC814CA960CCB05C1B6319@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "" , "" Subject: Re: [radext] #151: Section 2.9: WLAN-SSID Attribute in Access-Accept X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 00:03:50 -0000 On May 4, 2013, at 3:42 PM, radext issue tracker wrote: > #151: Section 2.9: WLAN-SSID Attribute in Access-Accept >=20 >=20 > Comment (by bernard_aboba@hotmail.com): >=20 > [BA] I believe it should say "within an Access-Request or Accounting- > Request packet" >=20 [Joe] Agree > --=20 > -------------------------------------+-----------------------------------= -- > Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- > bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org > Type: defect | Status: new > Priority: critical | Milestone: milestone1 > Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 > Severity: In WG Last Call | Resolution: > Keywords: | > -------------------------------------+-----------------------------------= -- >=20 > Ticket URL: > radext >=20 From jsalowey@cisco.com Mon May 6 17:26:57 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C73C21F8EED for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 17:26:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e4GuJYrb6e7E for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 17:26:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5292421F8EE8 for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 17:26:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2043; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1367886412; x=1369096012; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=GqlseFitCZDk0zX2Wde9CNmuKdW5e2N6ufq5dpGM/Ko=; b=atjyWz6AWvbjiapHqQcTOvGMWKCCQ2JYKzHt4eLf9gdn2DeOx3tEf2GI FB+fjKiDykqOJiP9BKvSA3cIxqO94OeLPdiYXiqDPMiX++fC/4hTs/5LZ IllNsfP6CGpFBHJ5QthmHvceIb4c6Ks7tJlJxIgxlzTZqWMxnYJKCDg+L c=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjwFAMRJiFGtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABQgwc3rHSSFYEJFnSCIAEBBDo/EAIBCCIUEDIlAgQOBQiHcgMPDLI5jjOMW4EudQIxB4JyYQOVS4MJiHmBdAOFHoMNgic X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,624,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="206918771" Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 May 2013 00:26:52 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com [173.37.183.80]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r470Qp7b007273 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 7 May 2013 00:26:51 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.125]) by xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([173.37.183.80]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 6 May 2013 19:26:51 -0500 From: "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" To: "" Thread-Topic: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info Thread-Index: AQHOSRoJhjEhE2N9nEKPHCMplUm8jJj5NMCA Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 00:26:51 +0000 Message-ID: References: <066.e99973544c7878635851fd28a6cf5689@trac.tools.ietf.org> In-Reply-To: <066.e99973544c7878635851fd28a6cf5689@trac.tools.ietf.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.33.248.202] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <7CF3F9EA7899D0478355E619771B8D06@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "" , "" Subject: Re: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 00:26:57 -0000 On May 4, 2013, at 3:52 PM, radext issue tracker wrote: > #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info >=20 > The Access-Info Attribute is utilized by implementations of > IEEE-802.1X [IEEE-802.1X] to specify the Access status information > field within an Access Information Type Length Value Tuple (TLV) > to be sent to the user within MACsec Key Agreement (MKA) or EAPoL- > Announcement frames. >=20 > A single Access-Info Attribute is permitted within a RADIUS > Access-Accept, Access-Challenge, Access-Reject or Accounting- > Request packet. >=20 > [BA] The above paragraph seems to imply that the Access-Info Attribute > could cause the Access status information to change during and after > authentication. It is unclear how supplicants would respond to such a > change. For example, the potential response to a change in MKA (which is > authenticated) could be quite different from a change in an EAPoL- > Announcement frame (which is not). As a result, the desired behavior is > unclear. >=20 [Joe] The EAPoL-announcement may be protected with MACSEC if a connectivit= y association exists. IEEE-802.1X-2010 specifies that the access status i= nformation in section 10.1. Do you think it is within our scope to specify= something in addition to this?=20 > --=20 > -------------------------------------+-----------------------------------= -- > Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- > bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org > Type: defect | Status: new > Priority: critical | Milestone: milestone1 > Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 > Severity: In WG Last Call | Keywords: > -------------------------------------+-----------------------------------= -- >=20 > Ticket URL: > radext >=20 From jsalowey@cisco.com Mon May 6 17:46:08 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207E821F8C35 for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 17:46:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -109.979 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.620, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SARE_LWSHORTT=1.24, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fqj9jaszU7Wt for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 17:45:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C0A21F86E4 for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 17:45:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2519; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1367887555; x=1369097155; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=RReCfrkOVtdDclZIjVjewuGq31UdMPUsAb2/SzfOO2o=; b=GpK9MTwj0CouNZonpS2XBo7JxhYhpEVIa/N5GGTzXnexWPumu5Zw2AiB B1IW8HcEp8SjS+bMi5WGMG8m1ASEUezDfDwOLDajCDe4SjpFKRlCPJm14 6Vv2TuxW85CjhYnoJkYvV/3RmS8zCPoteB0Al9e4F+Oap8q5TmbLHa4nm U=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgsFAO1NiFGtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABQgwe/P4EKFnSCHwEBAQMBeQULAgEIGAokIRElAgQOBQgTh18DCQayRYYZDYgSjFuCIwIxB4JyYQOIYIxqjXeFIYMNgic X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,624,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="207114219" Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 May 2013 00:45:54 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com [173.37.183.82]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r470jsF7013395 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 7 May 2013 00:45:54 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.125]) by xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([173.37.183.82]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 6 May 2013 19:45:54 -0500 From: "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" To: Jouni Korhonen Thread-Topic: [radext] New DTLS document Thread-Index: AQHOPxrSUMYvYTIR/ESEOHVAZTrrOpjtPcYAgAHZJgCAAtwTAIAAf/aAgAAuUICABqzMAA== Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 00:45:54 +0000 Message-ID: References: <516EA97E.2000005@deployingradius.com> <0E1BBA4B-1985-43C3-800A-AF336CABEF30@gmail.com> <517FBD04.1050009@deployingradius.com> <51828E77.9020303@deployingradius.com> <061B9149-3354-4E53-8721-FCD86BF03EF0@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <061B9149-3354-4E53-8721-FCD86BF03EF0@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.33.248.202] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "" , Alan DeKok Subject: Re: [radext] New DTLS document X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 00:46:08 -0000 On May 2, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On May 2, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Alan DeKok wrote: >=20 >> Jouni Korhonen wrote: >>> I would be ok to remove Section 5.1.2 entirely. >>=20 >> Which means that the rest of the document needs to be updated, too. >> It talks about accepting UDP and DTLS on the same port. Section 5.1.2 >> is only *justification* for why that works. The other sections say >> *how* it's supposed to work. >>=20 >> i.e. Deleting 5.1.2 means we'd have to delete more than half of >> Section 3, too. >=20 > That would be a side effect of this approach. However, most folks > (including me) seems to be okish keeping the current text as well. > So it would be Joe's voice that counts here now. >=20 [Joe] So, I don't see any description as to how the transition mechanism = allows transition to the new port. Without this it seems its not really a= transition mechanism but something that is intended to be around for a whi= le. So I think we either need to define how to actually transition or fix = the mechanism. =20 >=20 >>> However, if WG wants to keep >>> Section 5.1.2 I would add a note there that it is intended to be a shor= t term=20 >>> migration solution and can be turned off at some point of time. Impleme= ntations >>> and deployments are encouraged to switch to the RADIUS-DTLS port as soo= n as >>> possible. Would that be OK for the WG? >>=20 >> I already added that in the latest rev. See Section 3: >>=20 >> This section describes how clients and servers should transition to >> DTLS. There is a fair amount of discussion around this transition, >> as it is critical to get it correct. We expect that once >> implementations have transitioned to RADIUS/DTLS, the text in this >> section will no longer be relevant. >>=20 >> If we're just going to turn off UDP, we don't need any transition >> path. We just break the network, and let everyone figure out what to do= . >>=20 >> The whole point of the text in Section 3 is to document how the >> transition path is handled. Including (if so desired) accepting UDP and >> DTLS on the same port. >>=20 >> I can add duplicate text in Section 5.1.2. But the idea is for people >> to read the *entire* document, and act on it as a whole. >=20 > No need to duplicate. A pointer back to Section 3 would definitely=20 > suffice. >=20 > - Jouni >=20 >=20 >>=20 >> Alan DeKok. >=20 From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Mon May 6 19:44:16 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1702D21F9341 for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 19:44:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ca+z2evvnffa for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 19:44:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9E221F930C for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 19:44:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33384 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UZXsn-00058z-R0; Tue, 07 May 2013 04:44:01 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 02:44:01 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/155#comment:1 Message-ID: <081.87b6906ce39371c1c586c6779aaa0d5e@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.785a2f9012d700a58500e4fa1af7b98e@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 155 In-Reply-To: <066.785a2f9012d700a58500e4fa1af7b98e@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, j@w1.fi, jsalowey@cisco.com, mark@azu.ca, paul_congdon@hp.com Resent-Message-Id: <20130507024415.7A9E221F930C@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 19:44:12 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #155: Section 2.11 WLAN-Venue-Info X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 02:44:16 -0000 #155: Section 2.11 WLAN-Venue-Info Comment (by bernard_aboba@hotmail.com): Should say "Zero or one WLAN-Venue-Info Attribute may be included in an Access-Request or Accounting-Request packet." -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: critical | Milestone: milestone1 Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 Severity: In WG Last Call | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Mon May 6 19:47:52 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7E421F930C for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 19:47:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SLSdtuj16AEu for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 19:47:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C149621F8DE4 for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 19:47:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33589 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UZXwR-0006BO-2Z; Tue, 07 May 2013 04:47:47 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 02:47:47 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/152#comment:1 Message-ID: <081.1f713c4754d3357603fcb0ab54feea3b@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.b9edaeb6aac9f234a16b0c5c0347d559@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 152 In-Reply-To: <066.b9edaeb6aac9f234a16b0c5c0347d559@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, j@w1.fi, jsalowey@cisco.com, mark@azu.ca, paul_congdon@hp.com Resent-Message-Id: <20130507024751.C149621F8DE4@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 19:47:51 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #152: Section 2.7: Network-Id-Name X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 02:47:52 -0000 #152: Section 2.7: Network-Id-Name Comment (by bernard_aboba@hotmail.com): Recommended text: Zero or one Network-Id-Name Attribute is permitted within a RADIUS Access-Request, Access-Accept or Accounting-Request packet. When included within an Access-Request packet, the Network-Id-Name Attribute represents a hint of the NID-Name to which the Supplicant should be granted access. When included within an Access-Accept packet, the Network- Id-Name Attribute represents the NID-Name to which the Supplicant is to be granted access. When included within an Accounting-Request packet, the Network-Id-Name Attribute represents the NID-Name to which the Supplicant has been granted access. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: critical | Milestone: milestone1 Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 Severity: In WG Last Call | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From stig@venaas.com Tue May 7 10:34:00 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DE221F93B4 for ; Tue, 7 May 2013 10:34:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8jauLsW2x2n2 for ; Tue, 7 May 2013 10:33:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ufisa.uninett.no (ufisa.uninett.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2:158:38:152:126]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829F021F9130 for ; Tue, 7 May 2013 10:33:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [IPv6:2001:420:4:ea0c:f9c1:dccb:fdeb:7088] (unknown [IPv6:2001:420:4:ea0c:f9c1:dccb:fdeb:7088]) by ufisa.uninett.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFB9B813C for ; Tue, 7 May 2013 19:33:49 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <51893AFB.1080006@venaas.com> Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 10:33:47 -0700 From: Stig Venaas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: radext@ietf.org References: <516EA97E.2000005@deployingradius.com> <0E1BBA4B-1985-43C3-800A-AF336CABEF30@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <0E1BBA4B-1985-43C3-800A-AF336CABEF30@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [radext] New DTLS document X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 17:34:00 -0000 On 4/29/2013 1:32 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote: > > Thanks Joe for detailed comments. Just few generic questions to the WG. > > 1) Do you agree with Joe's suggestion to use the same port as RADSEC: > > radius-dtls 2083/udp RADIUS over DTLS [RFCTBD] I support using the same port as RADSEC. > 2) Do you think Joe's concern on Section 5.1.2 "disambiguation recommendation" > is something that need to be reconsidered.. FWIW, I've also implemented RADSEC over DTLS and at least with my implementation it would be hard to do both regular RADIUS and DTLS on the same port. So I certainly prefer them to be different ports. No other comments. Stig > - Jouni > > > On Apr 22, 2013, at 8:32 AM, Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) wrote: > >> I think there are a few inconsistencies that need cleaning-up: >> >> - Section 2.2.1 >> >> Section 2.5 of RFC 6614 should apply to RADIUS over DTLS since a single port is used for all types of RADIUS codes. ( I think the last bullet point in section 2.1 should be removed as well.) >> >> - Section 5.1.1 >> >> This section references a requirement to receive RADIUS/UDP and RADIUS/DTLS on the same port, this is no longer a requirement. Suggest cleaning up the text along the lines of: >> >> " ... Implementations that accept RADIUS/DTLS on the RADIUS/UDP port may find this recommendation difficult to implement in >> practice. ... " >> >> - Section 5.1.2 >> >> I still have a concern about the disambiguation recommendation since it relies upon a protocol field which is not in control of RADIUS, but it is rather in control of DTLS. Its possible that int he future DTLS may choose to define a new extended handshake type that would use a different type code of 22. This would introduce ambiguity and prevent this version of DTLS from being used with this mechanism. It would be a better, more reliable design to have the disambiguation rely upon something that RADIUS had control over. For example, define a RADIUS code type that encapsulates a RADIUS DTLS message. >> >> Additionally section 5.1.2 should clarify that it only applies to implementations that accept RADIUS/DTLS on the RADIUS/UDP port >> >> - Section 5.1.3 >> >> Most of this section applies to implementations that accept RADIUS/DTLS on the RADIUS/UDP port. THis section should clarify this. I think the last 3 paragraphs are generic and can be moved to a a different section, such as 5.1.1. >> >> >> - Section 9 >> >> We could request the same port as RADSEC. Something like: >> >> IANA is requested to assign a registered UDP port number for RADIUS over DTLS. The same values as for RADIUS over TLS (RFC6614) are requested. That is, update the registry as follows: >> >> radius-dtls 2083/udp RADIUS over DTLS [RFCTBD] >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Apr 18, 2013, at 12:26 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote: >> >>> >>> Folks, >>> >>> >>> >>> Everybody happy with -05 ? If I here no immediate >>> voices of disagreement, we can conclude the WG >>> has reached consensus and the document can move >>> forward. I'll wait till next Monday. >>> >>> - Jouni >>> >>> >>> >>> On Apr 17, 2013, at 4:54 PM, Alan DeKok wrote: >>> >>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-radext-dtls-05 >>>> >>>> Which addresses all of the open concerns. >>>> >>>> Alan DeKok. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> radext mailing list >>>> radext@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> radext mailing list >>> radext@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext >> > > _______________________________________________ > radext mailing list > radext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext > From bclaise@cisco.com Wed May 8 09:34:34 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227E821F961F for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 09:34:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.294 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.294 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.305, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rLV7-LGVKtdg for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 09:34:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F4421F9615 for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 09:34:29 -0700 (PDT) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r48GYSvt027501; Wed, 8 May 2013 18:34:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.61.208.20] ([10.61.208.20]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r48GY6oH013466; Wed, 8 May 2013 18:34:17 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <518A7E7E.9040804@cisco.com> Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 17:34:06 +0100 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jouni Korhonen References: <20130429184952.EBA71B1E008@rfc-editor.org> <63AAB07F-3BED-4BD5-9AD3-2FB9B4454A38@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <63AAB07F-3BED-4BD5-9AD3-2FB9B4454A38@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "radext@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [radext] New RFC 6911 on RADIUS Attributes for IPv6 Access Networks X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 16:34:34 -0000 On 30/04/2013 07:54, Jouni Korhonen wrote: > Congratulations to the authors and thanks for the hard work. +1 Regards, Benoit > > - Jouni & Mauricio > > > On Apr 29, 2013, at 9:49 PM, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote: > >> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. >> >> >> RFC 6911 >> >> Title: RADIUS Attributes for IPv6 Access >> Networks >> Author: W. Dec, Ed., >> B. Sarikaya, >> G. Zorn, Ed., >> D. Miles, >> B. Lourdelet >> Status: Standards Track >> Stream: IETF >> Date: April 2013 >> Mailbox: wdec@cisco.com, >> sarikaya@ieee.org, >> glenzorn@gmail.com, >> davidmiles@google.com, >> blourdel@juniper.net >> Pages: 15 >> Characters: 28123 >> Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None >> >> I-D Tag: draft-ietf-radext-ipv6-access-16.txt >> >> URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6911.txt >> > _______________________________________________ > radext mailing list > radext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext > > From internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu May 23 06:34:25 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC9321F9413; Thu, 23 May 2013 06:34:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ga8j6M0Eg30a; Thu, 23 May 2013 06:34:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BB321F93FC; Thu, 23 May 2013 06:34:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.50 Message-ID: <20130523133424.22844.78347.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 06:34:24 -0700 Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-nai-03.txt X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 13:34:25 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the RADIUS EXTensions Working Group of the IE= TF. Title : The Network Access Identifier Author(s) : Alan DeKok Filename : draft-ietf-radext-nai-03.txt Pages : 22 Date : 2013-05-23 Abstract: In order to provide inter-domain authentication services, it is necessary to have a standardized method that domains can use to identify each others users. This document defines the syntax for the Network Access Identifier (NAI), the user identity submitted by the client prior to accessing network resources. This document is a revised version of RFC 4282 [RFC4282], which addresses issues with international character sets, as well as a number of other corrections to the previous document. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-nai There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-radext-nai-03 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-radext-nai-03 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From jouni.nospam@gmail.com Thu May 23 09:53:03 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FAD21F93B1 for ; Thu, 23 May 2013 09:53:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V+uYfvz3Wp7x for ; Thu, 23 May 2013 09:52:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com (mail-lb0-f170.google.com [209.85.217.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A220D21F9397 for ; Thu, 23 May 2013 09:48:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id t13so3674220lbd.29 for ; Thu, 23 May 2013 09:48:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=KLXhVK4gebO+l68Ove3IS2LVVMw8b74K3K4iHXdG9rs=; b=wKYrYw1rGqhy7hgB5zPYnOOwZ+JcText/OQmQ/TIdoXHKh4c+39kTUDGvWH4aaB5G7 YdEYla1jVlhJu6mtUdWoFlhoy4AsWw9q/bUD+UJ7MxksBGul8bZLcy2WizyKgAd+jNGK On1PfBzIXmAKQdonpM32m+ZJ/Z7PZ07pk4ozOFdmqasydO4S7VETwwpH9pBly8ZhxG9P Qcy0AZlehFYawaf9FxHjE/duRViHCWdsugzkWGcq5gxFFaW6MoYCKSFIf4PJqMbAxdaO eKok91fL/o+1I8OFE36EpKCcsOpv9J84RuZTbz2MmPR985TjqBsHYpLLnrJimG/VKu5d 6WEw== X-Received: by 10.152.26.41 with SMTP id i9mr6851143lag.12.1369327718121; Thu, 23 May 2013 09:48:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.123.231.22] ([192.36.80.8]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c5sm5092356lbe.1.2013.05.23.09.48.36 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 23 May 2013 09:48:37 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) From: Jouni Korhonen In-Reply-To: <20130523133424.22844.78347.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 19:48:35 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <34A1AEF7-7359-4657-9241-ADA363028A96@gmail.com> References: <20130523133424.22844.78347.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> To: "radext@ietf.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) Subject: [radext] Please check: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-nai-03.txt X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 16:53:04 -0000 Folks, Please check the revision -03 whether it clears the concerns discussed on the list (the normalization issue). Also, when reviewing indicate if you think the document is ready to move on or whether it still needs more WG work. - Jouni On May 23, 2013, at 4:34 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: >=20 > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts = directories. > This draft is a work item of the RADIUS EXTensions Working Group of = the IETF. >=20 > Title : The Network Access Identifier > Author(s) : Alan DeKok > Filename : draft-ietf-radext-nai-03.txt > Pages : 22 > Date : 2013-05-23 >=20 > Abstract: > In order to provide inter-domain authentication services, it is > necessary to have a standardized method that domains can use to > identify each others users. This document defines the syntax for = the > Network Access Identifier (NAI), the user identity submitted by the > client prior to accessing network resources. This document is a > revised version of RFC 4282 [RFC4282], which addresses issues with > international character sets, as well as a number of other > corrections to the previous document. >=20 >=20 > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-nai >=20 > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-radext-nai-03 >=20 > A diff from the previous version is available at: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-radext-nai-03 >=20 >=20 > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >=20 > _______________________________________________ > I-D-Announce mailing list > I-D-Announce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt From jouni.nospam@gmail.com Sun May 26 08:38:11 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E55321F8ECB for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 08:38:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.299 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UpQR8WttktmD for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 08:38:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3015521F8B98 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 08:38:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id e50so3384652eek.27 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 08:38:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :cc:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=+GpC365HF7LTla4+KG+iXJE5+7JtlOGszkealKLay88=; b=PUM88/xpO7Ou8XC3vABEKsOeK3lYPZTnETlHWmp5RZr2mOLbn1shk64ixA5U5WezK0 FL0nu+8zuU28K3jKOya90Vf9+alxMLwFpRR+/DZpftiTHhq3INNzozKpGUY/G/pQPIAs w4JSZ3DTUPz0uaHhD+SwDl/tv3PgiRFimBVeKo+RMlHuxIJLZPIl0hJhGRIqQnZLLDlp 3sXHiEc/GnmZqnUZES+lRmyNOMDMFcuMmrum7lfANQzzfGNHNXV+/5uXhBGKdzAUIL5S Nc3AXWS0T0LpyTLA33WqNXIGWPiyN76niMd453d8lk5o3gb53xSEyIA3xHCQorCyG+2/ nZHQ== X-Received: by 10.15.10.130 with SMTP id g2mr47160500eet.25.1369582684367; Sun, 26 May 2013 08:38:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [188.117.15.107] ([188.117.15.107]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w43sm6775259eel.0.2013.05.26.08.38.02 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 26 May 2013 08:38:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Jouni Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 18:38:01 +0300 Message-Id: <48059112-8694-43E2-994F-14382BED4AD9@gmail.com> To: radext@ietf.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) Cc: radext-chairs@tools.ietf.org Subject: [radext] Call for agenda items for IETF#87 Berlin meeting X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 15:38:11 -0000 Folks, We have requested for one and half hour meeting slot. If you feel like presenting your work (be that in the current charter or not), send a request to the co-chairs. Obviously, chartered items will be prioritized over other topics. - Jouni & Mauricio From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Sun May 26 17:59:09 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847C521F9457 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 17:59:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DC23q8xFKQYk for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 17:59:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA66921F9425 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 17:59:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52709 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Uglm6-0003rJ-UL; Mon, 27 May 2013 02:58:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 00:58:58 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://ebook.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/150#comment:2 Message-ID: <081.a55bb0fd6f2e650f7187385d92a3bbcc@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.e919bac78e4db075aee7612e6b79bbc9@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 150 In-Reply-To: <066.e919bac78e4db075aee7612e6b79bbc9@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, j@w1.fi, jsalowey@cisco.com, mark@azu.ca, paul_congdon@hp.com Resent-Message-Id: <20130527005908.EA66921F9425@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 17:59:08 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #150: OUI and Suite Type Reference X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 00:59:09 -0000 #150: OUI and Suite Type Reference Changes (by bernard_aboba@hotmail.com): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: minor | Milestone: milestone1 Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 Severity: In WG Last Call | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Sun May 26 18:07:11 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C8421F946F for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:07:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MIkomCffUyfm for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:07:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9338821F9425 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:07:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53505 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ugltr-0000Xo-RL; Mon, 27 May 2013 03:06:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 01:06:59 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/156 Message-ID: <066.c08636a920f0c3417ed72a2d5b95866e@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 156 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, j@w1.fi, jsalowey@cisco.com, mark@azu.ca, paul_congdon@hp.com Resent-Message-Id: <20130527010704.9338821F9425@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 18:07:04 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] #156: Access-Info in Disconnect-Request and CoA-Request packets X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 01:07:11 -0000 #156: Access-Info in Disconnect-Request and CoA-Request packets It appears that the Access-Info Attribute could potentially be included in a Disconnect-Request and CoA-Request packet. Change Section 2.8 to read: A single Access-Info Attribute is permitted within an Access-Accept, Access-Challenge, Access-Reject, Accounting-Request, CoA-Request or Disconnect-Request packet. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: milestone1 Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 Severity: In WG Last Call | Keywords: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Sun May 26 18:11:38 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AABF21F9425 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:11:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6yWux6zNP9sJ for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0482121F9350 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:11:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53645 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UglyG-00042V-2f; Mon, 27 May 2013 03:11:32 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 01:11:32 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://ebook.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/157 Message-ID: <066.dc71c686374a92fe0e6cd064ed9faa89@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 157 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, j@w1.fi, jsalowey@cisco.com, mark@azu.ca, paul_congdon@hp.com Resent-Message-Id: <20130527011138.0482121F9350@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 18:11:37 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] #157: Preauth-Timeout Attribute in CoA-Request packet X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 01:11:38 -0000 #157: Preauth-Timeout Attribute in CoA-Request packet It appears that a Preauth-Timeout Attribute could be included within a CoA-Request packet, in order to remove preauthentication key state in a situation where a user has been disconnected from the WLAN by the administrator. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: milestone1 Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 Severity: In WG Last Call | Keywords: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Sun May 26 18:15:19 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6534321F93BB for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:15:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RlSJSUmFScEe for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:15:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE79721F8EBB for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:15:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53979 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ugm1p-0007Dj-6J; Mon, 27 May 2013 03:15:13 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 01:15:13 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://ebook.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/151#comment:2 Message-ID: <081.e43c6172d64e79660c633ec07fa5a8eb@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.98573781c9998b5674844b4dec7833b8@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 151 In-Reply-To: <066.98573781c9998b5674844b4dec7833b8@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, j@w1.fi, jsalowey@cisco.com, mark@azu.ca, paul_congdon@hp.com Resent-Message-Id: <20130527011518.BE79721F8EBB@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 18:15:18 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #151: Section 2.9: WLAN-SSID Attribute in Access-Accept X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 01:15:19 -0000 #151: Section 2.9: WLAN-SSID Attribute in Access-Accept Changes (by bernard_aboba@hotmail.com): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: critical | Milestone: milestone1 Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 Severity: In WG Last Call | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Sun May 26 18:47:08 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E2B21F937A for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:47:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yLUf66rwj--t for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:47:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFEE621F9330 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:47:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55664 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UgmWa-0005Nm-J1; Mon, 27 May 2013 03:47:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 01:47:00 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://ebook.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/156#comment:1 Message-ID: <081.d3824108bd6adf5fcdff94c0233e2936@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.c08636a920f0c3417ed72a2d5b95866e@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 156 In-Reply-To: <066.c08636a920f0c3417ed72a2d5b95866e@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, j@w1.fi, jsalowey@cisco.com, mark@azu.ca, paul_congdon@hp.com Resent-Message-Id: <20130527014706.DFEE621F9330@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 18:47:06 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #156: Access-Info in Disconnect-Request and CoA-Request packets X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 01:47:08 -0000 #156: Access-Info in Disconnect-Request and CoA-Request packets Changes (by bernard_aboba@hotmail.com): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: milestone1 Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 Severity: In WG Last Call | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Sun May 26 18:48:43 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D5C21F937A for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:48:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l2FL0Or3nJTk for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:48:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9BC21F9330 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:48:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55706 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UgmY4-0001FK-VS; Mon, 27 May 2013 03:48:32 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 01:48:32 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://ebook.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/157#comment:1 Message-ID: <081.4401e73d196424650cfc7c3abf5ca37d@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.dc71c686374a92fe0e6cd064ed9faa89@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 157 In-Reply-To: <066.dc71c686374a92fe0e6cd064ed9faa89@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, j@w1.fi, jsalowey@cisco.com, mark@azu.ca, paul_congdon@hp.com Resent-Message-Id: <20130527014837.4F9BC21F9330@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 18:48:37 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #157: Preauth-Timeout Attribute in CoA-Request packet X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 01:48:43 -0000 #157: Preauth-Timeout Attribute in CoA-Request packet Comment (by bernard_aboba@hotmail.com): Change Section 2.6 to state: A single Preauth-Timeout Attribute MAY be included within an Access-Accept or CoA-Request packet. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: milestone1 Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 Severity: In WG Last Call | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Sun May 26 18:48:49 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5790F21F95EE for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:48:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FZqWE9nEPC3o for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:48:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EAC821F95EC for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:48:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55715 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UgmYH-0005Ad-38; Mon, 27 May 2013 03:48:45 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 01:48:45 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/157#comment:2 Message-ID: <081.4497cb2f66529a11db368e8bcd10bab1@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.dc71c686374a92fe0e6cd064ed9faa89@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 157 In-Reply-To: <066.dc71c686374a92fe0e6cd064ed9faa89@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, j@w1.fi, jsalowey@cisco.com, mark@azu.ca, paul_congdon@hp.com Resent-Message-Id: <20130527014848.9EAC821F95EC@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 18:48:48 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #157: Preauth-Timeout Attribute in CoA-Request packet X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 01:48:49 -0000 #157: Preauth-Timeout Attribute in CoA-Request packet Changes (by bernard_aboba@hotmail.com): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: milestone1 Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 Severity: In WG Last Call | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Sun May 26 18:51:06 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0129921F94D0 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:51:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZsOd+zGh4+aC for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:51:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2706D21F94BA for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:51:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55804 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UgmaT-0006IT-B5; Mon, 27 May 2013 03:51:01 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 01:51:01 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://ebook.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/155#comment:2 Message-ID: <081.944be3a5d014f127f83a9f0bdff3c623@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.785a2f9012d700a58500e4fa1af7b98e@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 155 In-Reply-To: <066.785a2f9012d700a58500e4fa1af7b98e@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, j@w1.fi, jsalowey@cisco.com, mark@azu.ca, paul_congdon@hp.com Resent-Message-Id: <20130527015105.2706D21F94BA@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 18:51:05 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #155: Section 2.11 WLAN-Venue-Info X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 01:51:06 -0000 #155: Section 2.11 WLAN-Venue-Info Changes (by bernard_aboba@hotmail.com): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: critical | Milestone: milestone1 Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 Severity: In WG Last Call | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Sun May 26 18:57:59 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB1521F94DF for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:57:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kDFenH52jfwi for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:57:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2302E21F911B for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 18:57:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56456 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ugmh5-0000c4-Do; Mon, 27 May 2013 03:57:51 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 01:57:51 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://ebook.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/152#comment:2 Message-ID: <081.40c0939e463d8e37229247adea4743e1@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.b9edaeb6aac9f234a16b0c5c0347d559@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 152 In-Reply-To: <066.b9edaeb6aac9f234a16b0c5c0347d559@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, j@w1.fi, jsalowey@cisco.com, mark@azu.ca, paul_congdon@hp.com Resent-Message-Id: <20130527015758.2302E21F911B@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 18:57:57 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #152: Section 2.7: Network-Id-Name X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 01:57:59 -0000 #152: Section 2.7: Network-Id-Name Comment (by bernard_aboba@hotmail.com): The following sentence is also included in the Network-Id-Name section: In order to indicate which network names the Supplicant is permitted to access, the Allowed-Called-Station-Id Attribute is provided within an Access-Accept. Can I presume that this sentence is to be removed? -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: critical | Milestone: milestone1 Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 Severity: In WG Last Call | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Sun May 26 19:03:17 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26C021F95EA for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 19:03:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sJJr8K21-ljK for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 19:03:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094AA21F95E7 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 19:03:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57104 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UgmmF-00070O-9q; Mon, 27 May 2013 04:03:11 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 02:03:11 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/152#comment:3 Message-ID: <081.c51964b3b8fdcc924e3b1a53d90cfd05@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.b9edaeb6aac9f234a16b0c5c0347d559@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 152 In-Reply-To: <066.b9edaeb6aac9f234a16b0c5c0347d559@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, j@w1.fi, jsalowey@cisco.com, mark@azu.ca, paul_congdon@hp.com Resent-Message-Id: <20130527020317.094AA21F95E7@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 19:03:16 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #152: Section 2.7: Network-Id-Name X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 02:03:17 -0000 #152: Section 2.7: Network-Id-Name Changes (by bernard_aboba@hotmail.com): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: critical | Milestone: milestone1 Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 Severity: In WG Last Call | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From ietf@augustcellars.com Thu May 30 14:31:52 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5275521F86AE; Thu, 30 May 2013 14:31:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.264 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.264 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.335, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jWWAr8GjTvLh; Thu, 30 May 2013 14:31:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.pacifier.net (smtp1.pacifier.net [64.255.237.171]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C7521F8696; Thu, 30 May 2013 14:31:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Philemon (mail.augustcellars.com [50.34.17.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jimsch@nwlink.com) by smtp1.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A66C2CA20; Thu, 30 May 2013 14:31:44 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jim Schaad" To: References: <20130530211857.10340.69519.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20130530211857.10340.69519.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 14:30:52 -0700 Message-ID: <04ee01ce5d7c$f7c60240$e75206c0$@augustcellars.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQGebNoyW1RF+EXbAdPZfyyPhs4Yspl+HVnw Content-Language: en-us Cc: radext@ietf.org, abfab@ietf.org, MOONSHOT-COMMUNITY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: [radext] FW: New Version Notification for draft-schaad-trust-router-problem-01.txt X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 21:31:52 -0000 I present this document for discussion on the IETF Trust Router mailing = list. It is a new and completely different version of the problem statement = from that offered by the Janet people. I think it is a more complete = and more understandable document that the one they have provided. The document was started under an alcoholic haze and frustration over = the fact that the BOF for the group might not occur in Berlin as was = originally envisioned. The primary hope of this document is to try and = get more conversation on this mailing list about the problem itself. = Note that I don't currently care what the solution is. That should be = discussed after the BOF has been completed. Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:19 PM > To: Jim Schaad > Subject: New Version Notification for = draft-schaad-trust-router-problem- > 01.txt >=20 >=20 > A new version of I-D, draft-schaad-trust-router-problem-01.txt > has been successfully submitted by Jim Schaad and posted to the IETF > repository. >=20 > Filename: draft-schaad-trust-router-problem > Revision: 01 > Title: Trust Router Problem Statement > Creation date: 2013-05-30 > Group: Individual Submission > Number of pages: 17 > URL: = http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-schaad-trust-router-problem-01.= txt > Status: = http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schaad-trust-router-problem > Htmlized: = http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schaad-trust-router-problem-01 > Diff: = http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-schaad-trust-router-problem-01 >=20 > Abstract: > There are a number of problems with using the current AAA framework > for doing access control, this document looks at a number of these > issues and poses some questions about how to create a new trust > router system. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > The IETF Secretariat